Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Chinese Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks In Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Chinese Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part One Writing System/Neuro-cognitive Processing of Chinese
- Part Two Morpho-lexical Issues in Chinese
- 3 Wordhood and Disyllabicity in Chinese
- 4 Characters as Basic Lexical Units and Monosyllabicity in Chinese
- 5 Parts of Speech in Chinese and How to Identify Them
- 6 Gaps in Parts of Speech in Chinese and Why?
- 7 Derivational and Inflectional Affixes in Chinese and Their Morphosyntactic Properties
- 8 The Extreme Poverty of Affixation in Chinese
- 9 On an Integral Theory of Word Formation in Chinese and Beyond
- 10 Compounding Is Semantics-driven in Chinese
- Part Three Phonetic-phonological Issues in Chinese
- Part Four Syntax-semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse Issues
- Index
- References
10 - Compounding Is Semantics-driven in Chinese
from Part Two - Morpho-lexical Issues in Chinese
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Chinese Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks In Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Chinese Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part One Writing System/Neuro-cognitive Processing of Chinese
- Part Two Morpho-lexical Issues in Chinese
- 3 Wordhood and Disyllabicity in Chinese
- 4 Characters as Basic Lexical Units and Monosyllabicity in Chinese
- 5 Parts of Speech in Chinese and How to Identify Them
- 6 Gaps in Parts of Speech in Chinese and Why?
- 7 Derivational and Inflectional Affixes in Chinese and Their Morphosyntactic Properties
- 8 The Extreme Poverty of Affixation in Chinese
- 9 On an Integral Theory of Word Formation in Chinese and Beyond
- 10 Compounding Is Semantics-driven in Chinese
- Part Three Phonetic-phonological Issues in Chinese
- Part Four Syntax-semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse Issues
- Index
- References
Summary
Current studies of semantic word formation of Chinese compounds aim to work out collocational patterns and semantic patterns. In addition to investigating the surface semantic relations among the composing morphemes of compound words, researchers adopt the methods of semantic-syntactic analyses of sentences and study the predicative relation among the composing morphemes. Rather than introducing argument structure, it might be better to make use of qualia structure to analyze the semantic structure of nominal compounds.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Chinese Linguistics , pp. 198 - 220Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Ceccagno, Antonella, and Basciano, Bianca. 2009. Sino-Tibetan: Mandarin Chinese. In The Oxford handbook of compounding, ed. Lieber, Rochelle and Stekauer, Pavol, 478–490. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ceccagno, Antonella, and Scalise, Sergio. 2006. Classification, structure and headedness of Chinese compounds. Lingue e linguaggio 2:233–260.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1948. Mandarin primer: An intensive course in spoken Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, Jing. 2018. A lexical semantic study of Chinese opposites. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, Jing, and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2014. Word ordering in Chinese opposite compounds. In Workshop on Chinese lexical semantics, 12–20. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Dong, Xiufang 董秀芳. 2004. Chinese lexicon and word formation 汉语的词库与词法. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ (vol. 7). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane. 1990. English verbs as a semantic net. International Journal of Lexicography 3(4):278–301.Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli 冯胜利. 2005. Light verb movement in modern and classical Chinese 轻动词移位与古今汉语的动宾关系. Linguistic Science 语言科学 1:3–16.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2):222–254.Google Scholar
Hong, Jia-Fei. 2015. Verb sense discovery in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based knowledge-intensive approach. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hong, Jia-Fei, and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2015. Ontology-based event relation prediction: A SUMO based study of Mandarin VV compounds. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 43(1):170–195.Google Scholar
Hong, Jia-Fei and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2019. A study on the near-synonyms sheng (sound) and yin (voice): The relation between lexical sense and cognitive concepts 「声」与「音」的近义辨析：词义与认知概念的关系. In Frontier research in Sinitic and Sino-Tibetan languages: Dedicated to Ting Pang-hsin on his eightieth birthday 《汉语与汉藏语前沿研究—丁邦新先生八秩寿庆论文集, ed. Ho, Dah-An, Yao, Yu-min, Chen, Zhongmin, Sun, Jingtao 何大安, 姚玉敏, 陈忠敏, 孙景涛, and Cheung, Samuel H. N.. Beijing: Social Science Documents.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren. 1997. Morphological transparency and autonomous morphology: A comparative study of tough constructions and nominalization. In Chinese language and linguistics III: Morphology and lexicon, 369–399. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, and Ahrens, Kathleen. 2003. Individuals, kinds and events: Classifier coercion of nouns. Language Sciences 25(4):353–373.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, Ahrens, Kathleen, Chang, Li-Li, Chen, Keh-Jiann, Liu, Mei-Chun, and Tsai, Mei-Chih. 2000. The module-attribute representation of verbal semantics: From semantic to argument structure. In International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, Volume 5, Number 1, February 2000: Special issue on Chinese verbal semantics, 19–46.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, Chen, Keh-Jiann, and Lai, Ching-Xiong. (eds.). 1997. Mandarin Chinese classifier and noun-classifier collocation dictionary 國語日報量詞典. Taipei: Mandarin Daily Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, Hsieh, Shu-Kai, and Chen, Keh-Jiann. 2017. Mandarin Chinese words and parts of speech: A corpus-based study. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, and Lin, Fu-Wen. 1992. Composite event structure and complex predicates: A template-based approach to argument selection. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica, 90–108.Google Scholar
Huang, Jie 黄洁. 2008. A cognitive study of metaphtonymic noun-noun compounds in Chinese and English 汉英隐转喻名名复合词语义的认知研究. Foreign Language Education 4:25–29.Google Scholar
Huang, Shuanfan. 1997. Chinese as a headless language in compounding morphology. In New approaches to Chinese word formation, ed. Packard, Jerome L., 261–284. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Johnston, Michael, and Busa, Federica. 1999. Qualia structure and the compositional interpretation of compounds. In Breadth and depth of semantic lexicons, ed. Viegas, Evelyne, 167–187. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1971. On generative semantics. In Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, ed. Steinberg, Danny D. and Jakobovits, Leon A., 232–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Chih-yao, Chang, Chia-hao, Hsu, Wei-chieh, and Hsieh, Shu-kai. 2010. Qualia modification in noun-noun compounds: A cross-language survey. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing (ROCLING-2010), 379–390.Google Scholar
Levi, Judith. 1978. The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth.1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Li, Liangjun 黎良军. 1995. Chinese lexical semantics 汉语词汇语义学论稿. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Yafei. 1990. On VV compounds in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8(2):177–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libben, Gary, Gibson, Martha, Yoon, Yeo Bom, and Sandra, Dominiek. 2003. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language 84(1):50–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Hongchao, Chersoni, Emmanuele, Klyueva, Natalia, Santus, Enrico, and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2019. Semantic relata for the evaluation of distributional models in Mandarin Chinese. IEEE Access 7:145705–145713.Google Scholar
Liu, Shuxin 刘叔新. 1990a. A descriptive study of Chinese lexicon 汉语描写词汇学. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Shuxin 刘叔新. 1990b. The lexical structure of compounds: The relationship of syntax, lexicology and word formation 复合词结构的词汇属性——兼论语法学、词汇学同构词法的关系. Studies of the Chinese Language 中国语文 4:241–247.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang 吕叔湘. 1942. An outline of Chinese grammar 中国文法要略. Collection of Research Articles by Lü Shuxiang (Vol.1) 吕叔湘文集第一卷. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Mok, Leh Woon. 2009. Word-superiority effect as a function of semantic transparency of Chinese bimorphemic compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(7–8):1039–1081.Google Scholar
Packard, Jerome. 2016. Lexical word formation. In A reference grammar of Chinese, ed. Huang, Chu-Ren and Shi, Dingxu, 67–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics 17(4):409–441.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James, Moszkowicz, Jessica, Batiukova, Olga, and Rumshisky, Anna. 2009. GLML: Annotating argument selection and coercion. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS-8), ed. Bunt, Harry, Petukhova, Volha and Wubben, Sander, 169–180. Tilburg.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas, and Siegel, Muffy E. A.. 1978. A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. Linguistic Inquiry 9(2):199–260.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio, and Guevara, Emiliano. 2005. The lexicalist approach to word-formation and the notion of the lexicon. In Handbook of word-formation, 147–187. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Shen, Tian, and Baayen, R. Harald. 2021. Adjective–noun compounds in Mandarin: A study on productivity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Online first.Google Scholar
Shi, Dingxu, and Chu-Ren, Huang. 2022. Derivational and inflectional affixes in Chinese and their morphosyntactic properties. In The Cambridge handbook of Chinese linguistics, ed. Huang, Chu-Ren, Lin, Yen-Hwei, Chen, I-Hsuan, and Hsu, Yu-Yin, 135–157. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Song, Zuoyan 宋作艳. 2010. On the affixoids which can trigger off event coercion 类词缀与事件强迫. Chinese Teaching in the World 世界汉语教学 4:446–458.Google Scholar
Song, Zuoyan and Huang, Chu-Ren 宋作艳 黄居仁 . (eds.) 2018. The generative lexicon: Studies on the Chinese language 生成词库理论与汉语研究. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Song, Zuoyan, and Qiu, Likun. 2013. Qualia relations in Chinese nominal compounds containing verbal elements. International Journal of Knowledge and Language Processing 4(1):1–15.Google Scholar
Song, Zuoyan, Zhao, Qingqing, and Kang, Shiyong 宋作艳, 赵青青, 亢世勇. 2015. A lexicon of Chinese compound nouns with semantic annotation: Generative Lexicon Theory approach 汉语复合名词语义信息标注词库: 基于生成词库理论. Journal of Chinese Information Processing 中文信息学报 3:27–33,43.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard, and Shih, Chilin. 1996. A corpus-based analysis of Mandarin nominal root compounds. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 5:49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starosta, Stanley, Kuiper, Koenraad, Ng, Siew-ai, and Zhi-qian, Wu. 1997. On defining the Chinese compound word: Headedness in Chinese compounding and Chinese VR compounds. In New approaches to Chinese word formation, ed. Packard, Jerome L, 347–370. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Tan, Jingchun 谭景春. 2010. Semantic relations between nouns and noun modifiers and their roles in dictionary definition 名名偏正结构的语义关系及其在词典释义中的作用. Studies of the Chinese Language 中国语文 4:342–355.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongjun 王洪君. 1998. On the structure of daquan and yangshang and the differences between compounds and phrases 从与自由短语的类比看”打拳”“养伤”的内部结构. Linguistic research 语文研究 4:1–11.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongjun 王洪君. 2010. The semantic features and semantic hierarchy viewed from the similarities and differences in the collocations of typical morphemes in two equative substantial semantic fields of cooking utensils and containers 从两个同级义场代表单字的搭配异同看语义特征和语义层级. Chinese Teaching in the World 世界汉语教学 2:147–157.Google Scholar
Wang, Meng, Huang, Chu-Ren, Yu, Shiwen, and Li, Bin 王萌, 黄居仁, 俞士汶, 李 斌. 2010. Chinese noun compound interpretation based on paraphrasing verbs 基于动词的汉语复合名词短语释义研究. Journal of Chinese Information Processing 中文信息学报 24(6):3–9.Google Scholar
Wang, Shichang, Huang, Chu-Ren, Yao, Yao, and Chan, Angel. 2019. The effect of morphological structure on semantic transparency ratings. Language and Linguistics 20(2):225–255.Google Scholar
Xu, Tongqiang 徐通锵. 1997a.The central characters and Chinese semantic word formation 核心字和汉语的语义构辞法. Linguistic Research 语文研究 3:2–16.Google Scholar
Xu, Tongqiang 徐通锵. 1997b. Language: The structure and research approach of Chinese 语言论—语义型语言的结构原理和研究方法. Changchun: Northeast Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Yike, Huang, Chu-Ren, Dong, Sicong, and Chen, Si. 2018. Semantic transparency of radicals in Chinese characters: An ontological perspective. In Proceedings of the 32nd Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, Hong Kong, 788–797.Google Scholar
Ye, Wenxi 叶文曦. 2015. The semantic structure of Chinese compounds 汉语字组的语义结构. Taiwan: Hua Mulan Culture Press.Google Scholar
Zeng, Liying 曾立英. 2008. A quantitative and qualitative study on the semi-affixes of modern Chinese 现代汉语类词缀的定量与定性研究. Chinese Teaching in the World 世界汉语教学 4:75–87.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jiangli 张江丽. 2011. The uniqueness of Chinese compound word–taking compound words which contain the morpheme “hua” as the example 论汉语双音复合词结构的独特性——以语素”花”所构双音复合词为例. Academic Journal of LIYUN 励耘学刊 2011(1):185–199.Google Scholar
Zhou, Jian 周荐. 1991. The semantic relations between morphemes of Compounds 复合词词素间的意义结构关系. In Collections of linguistic studies (vol. 6) 语言研究论丛 (第六卷). Tianjin: Tianjin Education Press.Google Scholar
Zhu, Yan 朱彦. 2004. The semantic word formation of Chinese compounds 汉语复合词语义构词法研究. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by