Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:32:36.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Ethical Issues in Online Research

from Section III - Legal, Research, and Organizational Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2018

Mark M. Leach
Affiliation:
University of Louisville, Kentucky
Elizabeth Reynolds Welfel
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alessi, E. J. & Martin, J. I. (2010). Conducting an Internet-based survey: Benefits, pitfalls, and lessons learned. Social Work Research, 34, 122128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, P. J. & Roberts, L. D. (2010). The ethics of outsourcing online survey research. International Journal of Technoethics, 1, 3548.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Association of Internet Researchers (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0). Retrieved from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Baker, T. D. (2012). Confidentiality and electronic surveys: How IRBs address ethical and technical issues. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 34, 815. Retrieved from www.thehastingscenter.org/Publications/IRBGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, A. & Estalella, A. (2012). Rethinking research ethics for mediated settings. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 2342.Google Scholar
Bond, C. S., Ahmed, O. H., Hind, M., Thomas, B. & Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2013). The conceptual and practical ethical dilemmas of using health discussion board posts as research data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, S. K. & Carter, B. (2012). Reflections on the ethics of Internet newsgroup research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49, 625630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Psychological Society (2013). Ethics guidelines for Internet-mediated research. INF206/1.2013. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society. Retrieved from www.bps.org.uk/system/files/Public%20files/inf206-guidelines-for-internet-mediated-research.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bromseth, J. C. H. (2002). Public places: public activities? Methodological approaches and ethical dilemmas in research on computer-mediated communication contexts. In Morrison, A. (Ed.), Researching ICTs in context (pp. 3161). Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Brotsky, S. R. & Giles, D. (2007). Inside the “pro-ana” community: A covert online participant observation. Eating Disorders, 15, 93109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, E. A. & Hvizdak, E. E. (2009). Online survey tools: Ethical and methodological concerns of Human Research Ethics Committees. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4, 3748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvey, D. (2008). The art and politics of covert research: Doing “situated ethics” in the field. Sociology, 42, 905918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, J. & Mudaly, N. (2010). Staying safe: Strategies for qualitative child abuse researchers. Child Abuse Review, 19, 5669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: Issues and strategies. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 133144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmir, R., Schmied, V., Jackson, D., & Wilkes, L. (2011). Interviewing people about potentially sensitive topics. Nurse Researcher, 19, 1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, J., Dixit, J., & Green, D. P. (2002). Studying hate crime with the Internet: What makes racists advocate racial violence? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 177193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, S. D. & Mason, W. (2015). Internet research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 877902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillemin, M. & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and ethically important moments in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 261280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewson, C. (2015). Ethics issues in digital methods research. In Snee, H., Hine, C., Morey, Y., Roberts, S., & Watson, H. (Eds.), Digital methods for social science: An interdisciplinary guide to research innovation (pp. 206221). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Holtz, P., Kronberger, N., & Wagner, W. (2012). Analyzing internet forums. Journal of Media Psychology, 24, 5566.Google Scholar
Humphreys, K., Winzelberg, A., & Klaw, E. (2000). Psychologists’ ethical responsibilities in the Internet-based groups: Issues, strategies, and a call for dialogue. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 493496.Google Scholar
King, S. (1996). Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of the results. The Information Society, 12, 119127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J. & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs Advisory Group on the conduct of research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59, 105–17.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. P. & Arbuthnott, A. E. (2014). Non-suicidal self-injury, eating disorders, and the Internet. In Non-suicidal self-injury in eating disorders (pp. 273293). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S. P. & Seko, Y. (2016). A double‐edged sword: A review of benefits and risks of online nonsuicidal self‐injury activities. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72, 249262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, P. Y. (2013). Internet research and ethics: Transformative issues in nursing education research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30, 124129.Google Scholar
Malik, S. H. & Coulson, N. S. (2013). Coming to terms with permanent involuntary childlessness: A phenomenological analysis of bulletin board postings. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9, 7792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, A. (2012). Fabrication as ethical practice: Qualitative inquiry in ambiguous internet contexts. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 334353.Google Scholar
Mason, W. & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, J. & Crabtree, A. S. (2014). Covert research and adult protection and safeguarding: An ethical dilemma? The Journal of Adult Protection, 16, 2940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, H., Giles, D. C., & Moore, K. (2004). Researching sexuality and sexual issues: Implications for the researcher? Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 19, 7986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rier, D. A. (2007). Internet social support groups as moral agents: The ethical dynamics of HIV+ status disclosure. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29, 10431058.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. D. (2007). Opportunities and constraints of electronic research. In Reynolds, R. A., Woods, R., & Baker, J. D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (pp. 1927). Hershey, PA: Idea Reference Group.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. D. (2015). Ethical issues in conducting qualitative research in online communities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12, 314325.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. D. & Allen, P. J. (2015). Exploring ethical issues associated with using online surveys in educational research. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21, 95108.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., Smith, L., & Pollock, C. (2004). Conducting ethical research online: Respect for individuals, identities and the ownership of words. In Buchanan, E. A. (Ed.), Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies (pp. 156173). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.Google Scholar
Spicker, P. (2011). Ethical covert research. Sociology, 45, 118133.Google Scholar
van Deventer, J. P. (2009). Ethical considerations during human centred overt and covert research. Quality & Quantity, 43(1), 4557.Google Scholar
Whiteman, N. (2012). Ethical stances in (Internet) research. In Whiteman, N. (Ed.), Undoing ethics (pp. 123). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Whitlock, J. L., Powers, J. L., & Eckenrode, J. (2006). The virtual cutting edge: The Internet and adolescent self-injury. Developmental Psychology, 42, 407417.Google Scholar
Zurbriggen, E. L. (2002). II. Sexual objectification by research participants: Recent experiences and strategies for coping. Feminism & Psychology, 12, 261268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×