American Macroeconomic Growth in the Era of Knowledge-Based Progress: The Long-Run Perspective

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521553087.002

1 - American Macroeconomic Growth in the Era of Knowledge-Based Progress: The Long-Run Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Moses Abramovitz and

Paul David

Edited by

Stanley L. Engerman and

Robert E. Gallman

Show author details

Moses Abramovitz: Affiliation:
Stanford University, Emeritus
Paul David: Affiliation:
All Souls College, University of Oxford and Stanford University
Stanley L. Engerman: Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Robert E. Gallman: Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Book contents

Get access

Summary

OVERVIEW AND ORGANIZATION OF THE CHAPTER

This chapter focuses on the nature of the macroeconomic growth process that has characterized the United States experience, and manifested itself in the changing pace and sources of the rise of real output per capita in the U.S. economy during the past two hundred years. Our main interest is, indeed, in the twentieth century, but we believe that its major characteristics and the nature of the underlying forces at work are most clearly seen in comparisons between the century just past and the one that came before.

A key observation that emerges from the long-term quantitative economic record is that the proximate sources of increases in real gross domestic product per capita in the century between 1889 and 1989 were quite different from those which obtained during the first one hundred years of the American national experience. Baldly put, the national ecomomy moved from an extensive to an increasingly intensive mode of growth, and its development at the intensive margin has become more and more dependent upon the acquisition and exploitation of technological and organizational knowledge.

Our first objective, therefore, must be to assemble and describe the components of the U.S. macroeconomic record in some quantitative detail, in a manner that exposes the nature and dimensions of the contrast between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. We approach this task within the well-established framework of “growth accounting.” This enables us to show the secular acceleration that occurred in the growth rate of total factor productivity, which is the weighted average of the productivities of capital and labor, and the growth in the importance of total factor productivity as a source of labor productivity and per capita output increases.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Economic History of the United States , pp. 1 - 92

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521553087.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitz, Moses and David, Paul A., “Convergence and Deferred Catch-up: Productivity Leadership and the Waning of American Exceptionalism.” In Landau, Ralph, Taylor, Timothy, and Wright, Gavin (eds.), The Mosaic of Economic Growth (Stanford 1996).Google Scholar

Abramovitz, Moses and David, Paul A., “Technological Change and the Rise of Intangible Investments: The U.S. Economy’s Growth-Path in the Twentieth Century,” in Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy: OECD Documents (Paris, 1996).Google Scholar

Abramovitz, Moses, “Rapid Growth Potential and Its Realization: the Experience of Capitalist Economies in the Postwar Period,” in Malinvaud, Edmond, ed., Economic Growth and Resources, vol. I, The Major Issues (London, 1979)Google Scholar

Abramovitz, Moses, Inventories and Business Cycles, with Special Reference to Manufacturers’ Inventories (New York, 1950).Google Scholar

Abramovitz, Moses, Thinking About Growth [New York, 1989], chap. 6).CrossRef Google Scholar

Arora, Ashish, Landau, Ralph, and Rosenberg, Nathan (eds.), Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth: Insights from the Chemical Industry (New York, 1998).Google Scholar

Atack, Jeremy, “Economies of Scale and Efficiency Gains in the Rise of the Factory in America, 1820–1900,” in Kilby, Peter (ed.), Quantity and Quiddity: Essays in U.S. Economic History (Middle-town, CT, 1987)Google Scholar

Baumol, William J., Blackman, Sue Ann Batey, and Wolff, Edward N., Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View (Cambridge, MA, 1989)Google Scholar

Beniger, James R., The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society (Cambridge, MA, 1986).Google Scholar

Bresnahan, Timothy F. and Trajtenberg, Manuel, “General Purpose Technologies: Engines of Growth,” Journal of Econometrics, 65 (1995)CrossRef Google Scholar

Broadberry, S. N., The Productivity Race: British Manufacturing in International Perspective, 1850–1990 (Cambridge, England, 1997).CrossRef Google Scholar

Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, MA, 1977).Google Scholar

Christensen, Laurits R. and Jorgenson, Dale W., “Measuring Economic Performance in the Private Sector,” in Moss, Milton (ed.), The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance, Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. 38 (Chicago, 1973).Google Scholar

David, Paul A. and Wright, Gavin, “Increasing Returns and the Genesis of American Resource Abundance,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 6 (1997).CrossRef Google Scholar

David, Paul A. and Wright, Gavin, “Early Twentieth Century Productivity Growth Dynamics: An Inquiry into the Economic History of ‘Our Ignorance’.” Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 98–3, (1999).Google Scholar

David, Paul A. and Wright, Gavin, “General Purpose Technologies and Surges in Productivity: Historical Reflections on the Future of the ICT Revolution,” University of Oxford Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History (1999).Google Scholar

David, Paul A., “Computer and Dynamo: The Modern Productivity Paradox in a Not-Too-Distant Mirror,” in ,OECD, Technology and Productivity: The Challenge for Economic Policy (Paris, 1991).Google Scholar

David, Paul A., “General-purpose Engines, Investment and Productivity Growth: from the Dynamo Revolution to the Computer Revolution,” in Deiaco, E., Hornell, E., and Vickery, G. (eds.), Technology and Investment: Crucial Issues for the 1990s (London, 1991)Google Scholar

David, Paul A., “The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Productivity Paradox”, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 80 (1990)Google Scholar

David, Paul A., “Real Income and Economic Welfare Growth in the Early Republic” (1996).Google Scholar

David, Paul A., Technical Choice, Innovation, and Economic Growth (Cambridge, England, 1975)Google Scholar

Davis, Lance E., Eastetlin, Richard A., Parker, William N., et al., American Economic Growth: An Economist’s History of the United States (New York, 1972)Google Scholar

de la Escosura, Leandro Prados [“International Comparisons of Real Product, 1820–1990: An Alternative Data Set,” Explorations in Economic History 37 (2000)Google Scholar

de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (1840; reprint, New York, 1945), vol. II.Google Scholar

Denison, Edward F. and Chung, William, How Japan’s Economy Grew So Fast (Washington, D.C., 1976)Google Scholar

Denison, Edward F., The Sources of Growth in the United States and the Alternatives before Us (New York, 1962).Google Scholar

Denison, Edward F., Why Growth Rates Differ (Washington, D.C., 1967)Google Scholar

Duesenberry, James, Business Cycles and Economic Growth (New York, 1958).Google Scholar

Easterlin, Richard, “Industrial Revolution and Mortality Revolution: Two of a Kind?” Evolutionary Economics, 5 (1995)CrossRef Google Scholar

Easterlin, Richard, Population, Labor Force, and Long Swings in Economic Growth: The American Experience (New York, 1968).Google Scholar

Field, Alexander J., “Modern Business Enterprise as a Capital-Saving Innovation,” Journal of Economic History, 47 (1987).CrossRef Google Scholar

Field, Alexander J., “The Relative Productivity of American Distribution, 1869–1992,” Research in Economic History, 16 (1996).Google Scholar

Fishlow, Albert, “Productivity and Technological Growth in the Railroad Sector, 1840–1910, in Brady, Dorothy S. (ed.), Output Employment and Productivity in the United States after 1800, Studie in Income and Wealth, vol. 30 (New York, 1966)Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia and Katz, Lawrence F., “The Origins of Technology-Skill Complementarity,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (1998).CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia, “America’s Graduation from High School,” Journal of Economic History, 58 (1998).CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Raymond, A Study of Savings in the United States, vol. 3 (Princeton, 1956).Google Scholar

Gustavus, Susan O. and Nam, Charles B., “Estimates of the ‘True’ Educational Distribution of the Adult Population of the United States from 1910 to 1960,” Demography, 5 (1968).Google Scholar

Helpman, Elhanan, ed., General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth (Cambridge, MA, 1998)Google Scholar

Hounshell, David, From the American System to Mass Production, 1800–1932 (Baltimore, 1984).Google Scholar

Jorgenson, Dale W., Gollop, Frank, and Fraumeni, Barbara, Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth (Cambridge, MA, 1987).Google Scholar

Kendrick, John W., Productivity Trends in the United States (Princeton, 1961)Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon, National Product since 1869 (New York, 1946).Google Scholar

Licht, Walter (Getting Work: Philadelphia, 1840–1950, Cambridge MA, 1992Google Scholar

Maddison, Angus, Dynamic Forces of Capitalist Development (Oxford, 1991).Google Scholar

Maddison, Angus, Monitoring the World Economy (Paris, 1995).Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard, “Aggregate Production Functions and Medium-Range Growth Projections,” American Economic Review, 54 (1964).Google Scholar

Ohkawa, Kazushi and Rosovsky, Henry, Japanese Economic Growth: Trend Acceleration in the Twentieth Century (Stanford, 1973).Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Nathan, Perspectives on Technology (Cambridge, England, 1976).CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosovsky, Henry, Capital Formation in Japan, 1868–1940 (New York, 1961)Google Scholar

Sokoloff, Kenneth L., “Productivity Growth in Manufacturing during Early Industrialization: Evidence from the American Northeast, 1820–1860,” in Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E. (eds.), Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. 51 (Chicago, 1986).Google Scholar

,U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington, D.C., 1975).

Williamson, H. F. and Daum, A. R., The American Petroleum Industry (Evanston, 1959)Google Scholar

Williamson, H. F. et al., The American Petroleum Industry: The Age of Energy, 1899–1959 (Evanston, 1963)Google Scholar

Wright, Gavin, “The Origin of American Industrial Success, 1879–1940,” American Economic Review, 80 (1990).Google Scholar

Yates, JoAnne, Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management (Baltimore, 1989).Google Scholar

Book contents

1 - American Macroeconomic Growth in the Era of Knowledge-Based Progress: The Long-Run Perspective

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive