Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:28:16.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - From agrarian history to cross-cultural comparisons: Weber on Greco-Roman antiquity

from PART IV - LAW AND ECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2012

Stephen Turner
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Get access

Summary

Weber devoted a large part of his early work to the study of Greco-Roman antiquity. He published a book on Roman agrarian history, an article on the social causes of the decline of ancient culture, surveys of the agrarian history of ancient civilizations (Agrarverhältnisse im Altertum) in three successive editions of the encyclopedia Handwörterbuch der Staatstwissenschaften, and compared the ancient city (-state) with equivalents in European, and non-European cultures (Die Stadt, The City). There are numerous, if scattered, references to antiquity in his Economy and Society (E&S) and his collection of articles on the sociology of world religions (GARS).

Despite the considerable quantity of research and writing which Weber did on antiquity in his work prior to 1914 he never presented a comprehensive account of his view of antiquity. Rather he approached the subject under various questions and different angles. He started with agrarian history (and was occupied at the same time with current developments in the eastern parts of Prussia), widened his approach to a general view of the ancient economy, and finally used Greco-Roman Antiquity as one element for the cross-cultural comparisons he concentrated on in his later work.

Weber's Roman Agrarian History and its Importance to State and Civil Law of 1891 (the Habilitationsschrift by which he qualified himself for the discipline of Civil and Commercial Law; see MWG 1/2) is the only text which lives up to the usual standards of scholarly work on antiquity by constantly referring (though somewhat casually) to the ancient sources. It nevertheless proved to be highly controversial.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×