Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T12:05:26.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Critique as passion and polemic: Nietzsche and Wagner

from PART III - Ideas and ideology in the Gesamtkunstwerk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2011

Thomas S. Grey
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

“I cannot say by what means I might ever enjoy the purest radiant happiness other than through Wagner's music: and that even though it by no means always speaks of happiness, but [also] of the terrible and uncanny subterranean powers of human activity, of the sorrow contained in all happiness and the transience of our happiness; the happiness that issues from this music must have to do rather with the way it speaks.” Thus wrote Nietzsche in an unpublished fragment from the summer of 1875.

“Happiness” (Glück): the word occurs no less than five times in this one sentence. This was written at a time when Nietzsche had already begun to distance himself from Wagner in many ways. All the same, that music – as Thomas Mann wrote in his 1933 essay “The Sorrows and Grandeur of Richard Wagner” – was the “great love and passion of Nietzsche's life.” Yet Nietzsche's love was not for the music alone; it was just as much for Richard Wagner the person, the “old magician” as he repeatedly called him. “I loved him, and none other.” That comment, all the more remarkable for its lapidary formulation, was written in the spring of 1885, two years after Wagner's death.

For more than a century a dense thicket of legends and rumors has continued to grow up around Nietzsche’s relationship to Wagner. The many unpublished writings and fragments – which have only recently become available in a reliable, unexpurgated edition (that of Colli and Montinari) – indicate that the “break” with Wagner was hardly so rigorous as it has long been represented, based on an insufficient knowledge of the documentary sources. The younger Nietzsche’s attitude toward Wagner intertwined passion with critique, just as passion is merged with polemics in the later writings. That is why Mann could perceive the late polemics as really “a panegyric in reverse, another form of eulogy.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×