Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to the New Testament
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to the New Testament
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Map
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Historical Context
- Part II The New Testament Writings
- Part III Methods and Modes of Interpretation
- Index
- Cambridge Companions to Religion (continued from page iii)
- References
Part III - Methods and Modes of Interpretation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 April 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to the New Testament
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to the New Testament
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Map
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Historical Context
- Part II The New Testament Writings
- Part III Methods and Modes of Interpretation
- Index
- Cambridge Companions to Religion (continued from page iii)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to the New Testament , pp. 331 - 418Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Further Reading
Barton, John. Holy Writings, Sacred Text: The Canon in Early Christianity. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1997. Also published as The Spirit and the Letter: Studies in the Biblical Canon. London: SPCK, 1997.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Edmon L., and Meade, John D., eds. The Biblical Canon Lists from Early Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, Harry Y. The New Testament Canon: Its Making and Meaning. GBS. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985.Google Scholar
Markschies, Christoph. Christian Theology and Its Institutions in the Early Roman Empire: Prolegomena to a History of Early Christian Theology. Translated by Wayne Coppins. Baylor-Mohr Siebeck Studies in Early Christianity. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
McDonald, Lee Martin. The Biblical Canon: Its Origin, Transmission, and Authority. 3rd ed. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2007.Google Scholar
McDonald, Lee Martin, and Sanders, James A., eds. The Canon Debate. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2002.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Baird, William. History of New Testament Research. 3 vols. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1992–2013.Google Scholar
Campbell, Douglas A. Framing Paul: An Epistolary Biography. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Dungan, David Laird. Constantine’s Bible: Politics and the Making of the New Testament. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2006.Google Scholar
Gamble, Harry Y. Books and Readers in the Early Church: A History of Early Christian Texts. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. The Earliest Christian Artifacts: Manuscripts and Christian Origins. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A. The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M., and Ehrman, Bart D.. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Parker, D. C. An Introduction to New Testament Manuscripts and Their Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E., and Dyer, Bryan R., eds. The Synoptic Problem: Four Views. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2016.Google Scholar
Smith, D. Moody. John among the Gospels. 2nd ed. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Alter, Robert, and Kermode, Frank. The Literary Guide to the Bible. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Castelli, Elizabeth A., Moore, Stephen D., Phillips, Gary A., and Schwartz, Regina M., eds. The Postmodern Bible: The Bible and Culture Collective. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. “Can Narrative Criticism Recover the Theological Unity of Scripture?” Journal of Theological Interpretation 2 (2008): 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangum, Douglas, and Douglas, Estes, eds. Literary Approaches to the Bible. Lexham Methods Series 4. Bellingham: Lexham Press, 2016.Google Scholar
McKnight, Edgar V. The Bible and the Reader: An Introduction to Literary Criticism. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985.Google Scholar
Moore, Stephen D. Literary Criticism and the Gospels: The Theoretical Challenge. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Petersen, Norman. Literary Criticism for New Testament Critics. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1978.Google Scholar
Shively, Elizabeth E. “Becoming a Disciple without Seeing Jesus: Narrative As a Way of Knowing in Mark’s Gospel.” Pages 35–50 in Let the Reader Understand: Studies in Honor of Elizabeth Struthers Malbon. Edited by Broadhead, E. K.. LNTS 583. New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2018.Google Scholar
Sugirtharajah, Rasiah S. Postcolonial Criticism and Biblical Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Boer, Roland, and Økland, Jorunn, eds. Marxist Feminist Criticism of the Bible. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Crook, Zeba A. “Structure versus Agency in Studies of the Biblical Social World: Engaging with Louise Lawrence.” JSNT 29 (2007): 251–75Google Scholar
Crossley, James G. Jesus in an Age of Terror: Projects for a New American Century. London: Equinox, 2008.Google Scholar
Friesen, Steven J. “Poverty in Pauline Studies: Beyond the So-Called New Consensus.” JSNT 26 (2004): 323–61Google Scholar
Horrell, David G. “Social-Scientific Interpretation of the New Testament: Retrospect and Prospect.” Pages 3–27 in Social-Scientific Approaches to New Testament Interpretation. Edited by Horrell, David G.. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1999.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Louise J. “Structure, Agency and Ideology: A Response to Zeba Crook.” JSNT 29 (2007): 277–86.Google Scholar
Osiek, Carolyn, and MacDonald, Margaret Y. with Tulloch, Janet H., A Woman’s Place: House Churches in Earliest Christianity. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2006.Google Scholar
Schottroff, Luise. “‘Not Many Powerful’: Approaches to a Sociology of Early Christianity.” Pages 277–86 in Social-Scientific Approaches to New Testament Interpretation. Edited by Horrell, David G.. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1999.Google Scholar
Sugirtharajah, R.S. Exploring Postcolonial Biblical Criticism: History, Method, Practice. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.Google Scholar
Theissen, Gerd. Social Reality and the Early Christians: Theology, Ethics, and the World of the New Testament. Translated by M. Kohl. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1993.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Balla, Peter. Challenges to New Testament Theology: An Attempt to Justify the Enterprise. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus, and Torrance, Alan J., eds. Scripture’s Doctrine and Theology’s Bible: How the New Testament Shapes Christian Dogmatics. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008.Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert, ed. The Nature of New Testament Theology: The Contribution of William Wrede and Adolf Schlatter. London: SCM, 1973.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Benjamin, Lugioyo, Brian, and Vanhoozer, Kevin J., eds. Reconsidering the Relationship between Biblical and Systematic Theology in the New Testament: Essays by Theologians and New Testament Scholars. WUNT 2.369. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.Google Scholar
Rosner, Brian S., ed. New Dictionary of Biblical Theology: Exploring the Unity & Diversity of Scripture. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2004.Google Scholar
Rowland, Christopher, and Tuckett, Christopher, eds. The Nature of New Testament Theology: Essays in Honor of Robert Morgan. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.Google Scholar
Vanhoozer, Kevin J. ed. Theological Interpretation of the New Testament: A Book-by-Book Survey. Grand Rapids; Baker Academic, 2008.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, Robert W. The Salvation Historical Fallacy? Reassessing the History of New Testament Theology. Leiden, Deo, 2004.Google Scholar