Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:30:14.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - The Theology of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament

from Part V - Reception and use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

John Goldingay
Affiliation:
Fuller Theological Seminary
Stephen B. Chapman
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Marvin A. Sweeney
Affiliation:
Claremont School of Theology, California
Get access

Summary

Biblical theology, with Old Testament theology as an eventual subset, was a relative latecomer on the scene of biblical study. It emerged as a discipline distinguishable from systematic or dogmatic theology in the seventeenth century, with the role of providing the biblical evidence for the assertions of systematic or dogmatic theology. In the eighteenth century it began to assert itself as a discipline that should define its own categories rather than simply act as handmaid to systematics, and in 1787, Johann Philipp Gabler delivered a lecture that is commonly seen as a key articulation of this conviction, ‘An Oration on the Proper Distinction Between Biblical and Dogmatic Theology and the Specific Objectives of Each’. A number of nineteenth-century Old Testament theologies worked with Gabler's prescription, though they also continued to be influenced (consciously or unconsciously) by the categories of systematics, by the philosophical views of the day, and by New Testament priorities that led to an emphasis on marginal topics, such as resurrection, and a neglect of topics prominent in the Old Testament but not in Christian faith. It became customary for Old Testament theologians to draw attention to the way their predecessors were affected by the presuppositions of their time but not to recognize the same dynamics in their own work. In the twenty-first century, post-colonial or feminist or other postmodern perspectives are equivalents to the evolutionism, rationalism or romanticism of the nineteenth century. These provide frameworks that theologians bring to their study, which both illumine it and skew it.

WALTHER EICHRODT

Another such framework is the assumption that Old Testament theology needs to be approached historically, and it became common for theologies to comprise two parts, one tracing Israel's history and the other covering the theological implications of the literature in topical fashion. Indeed, the energy in nineteenth-century Old Testament study came to lie in tracing the history of Israel and its religion against their Middle Eastern background. This preoccupation rather left hanging the question of the Old Testament's ongoing religious and theological significance. It was after the 1914–18 war in Europe, and parallel to the work of Karl Barth in Christian dogmatics, that some Old Testament scholars began once more to think in theological terms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellis, Allis Ogden, and Kaminsky, Joel S., eds. Jews, Christians, and the Theology of the Hebrew Scriptures (SBLSS 8). Atlanta: SBL, 2000.
Brueggemann, Walter. Theology of the Old Testament. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1997.
Childs, Brevard S. Biblical Theology in Crisis. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1970.
Eichrodt, Walther. Theology of the Old Testament, 2 vols. London: SCM, 1961 and 1967.
Goldingay, John. Old Testament Theology, 3 vols. Downers Grove, IL: IVP 2003, 2006, 2009;Carlisle, UK: Paternoster 2006, 2006, 2009.
Ollenburger, Ben C., ed. Old Testament Theology: Flowering and Future, rev'd ed. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2004.
Perdue, Leo, ed. Biblical Theology. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 2008.
Rad, Gerhard von. Old Testament Theology, 2 vols., trans. by Stalker, D. G. M.. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1962 and 1965.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×