Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T21:47:41.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The political poet

from Part II - Works

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2007

Timothy Morton
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access

Summary

Intelligent idealism is closer to intelligent materialism than is unintelligent materialism.

(Lenin)

Materialism and idealism

Prometheus Unbound challenges its readers to think about reality in radically unaccustomed ways. The aphorism by the Marxist revolutionary V. I. Lenin with which I begin - one of the epigraphs to Frederic Jameson's Marxism and Form - offers a surprising but useful point of departure for thinking about connections between style and politics in Shelley's most ambitious and experimental work. As a point of departure it should not be taken to imply some kind of hidden identity between Shelley's and Lenin's (or any other Marxist revolutionary's) beliefs about our knowledge of reality. Nor should it be taken to imply an identity between Shelley's philosophical convictions and the dialectical idealism of Hegel, to whom Lenin is primarily referring. Instead, what Lenin's aphorism recognizes is a rejection of conventional dualistic assumptions about the relation of mind and matter common to radical idealism and radical materialism. For Shelley as for Lenin, this rejection of dualism is politically as well as philosophically critical. It forms part of the conceptual basis for a range of practices that are about remaking the world of human experience by releasing its full potential as a dynamic and differentiated totality.

Most people today - even in this era of advanced neuroscience and artificial intelligence - find it hard to entertain the idea that existence is entirely a function of material forces and phenomena. They find it harder still to entertain the belief that existence is entirely a function of mental or psychic forces and phenomena. Shelley understood the claims of both positions and saw them as alternatives to the 'fatal consequences' of believing that the material realm constituted one kind of reality, the realm of mental experience and value quite another.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×