Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:20:44.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Shakespeare’s cinematic offshoots

from Part IV - Critical Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2007

Russell Jackson
Affiliation:
Shakespeare Institute, University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

In the year 2000, King Lear walked into the Namibian desert. In 2002, his Fool was murdered in Liverpool’s post-industrial docks. Meanwhile Richard III clawed his way to the top of East Los Angeles’s drugs gangs, the Macbeths took over a fast-food restaurant, Othello became Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, and Hamlet learned to trust her uncle. Shakespeare, that is, provided the narrative spine for the Dogme experimental film The King is Alive (dir. Kristian Levring, Denmark, 2002), the bleak British social allegory My Kingdom (dir. Don Boyd, UK, 2002), the Hollywood exploitation movie The Street King (dir. James Gavin Bedford, USA, 2002), the comedy Scotland PA (dir. Billy Morrissette, USA, 2001), Geoffrey Sax and Andrew Davies’s t.v. Othello (2001) exploring contemporary race and gender problems, and the teen thriller The Glass House (dir. Daniel Sackheim, USA, 2001). Diverse in form, technique, audience and achievement, these updatings represented a practice as old and intriguing as Shakespearean cinema itself. In 1911 the British trade press welcomed the Danish silent film Desdemona, where a jealous modern actor murders his wife on-stage during a performance of Othello. The producers were congratulated for understanding the public, for providing not 'unadulterated Shakespeare' but 'a good modern play with a plot not too deep but just deep enough for mental exercise without effort, while interest and excitement are sustained throughout'. There were 'countless hordes to whom the Bard’s plays do not appeal in the remotest degree', but making a film 'so to speak, around the tragedy of Othello' should suit and satisfy and perhaps improve this mass audience.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×