Abbate, E. T. (2018), ‘Esoteric Origins: Theosophical Images and Influences in Webern’s Op. 29’, Journal of Musicological Research, 37:1, 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (1950), ‘Mißverständnisse’, Melos, 17, 75–7.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (1974), Einleitung in die Musiksoziologie, in Gesammelte Schriften, ed.Tiedemann, R., Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, xiv.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (1975), Philosophie der neuen Musik, in Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Tiedemann, R., Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, xii.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (1977), ‘Wissenschaftliche Erfahrungen in Amerika’, in Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Tiedemann, R, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, x.ii, 702–38.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (1984), ‘Anton Webern: Zur Aufführung der Fünf Orchesterstücke, op. 10 in Zürich’, in Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Tiedemann, R. and Schultz, K., Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, xviii, 513–6.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (1991), Alban Berg: Master of the Smallest Link, trans. J. Brand and C. Hailey,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, T. W. ([1961] 1992), ‘Vers une musique informelle’, in Quasi una fantasia: Essays on Modern Music, trans. R. Livingstone, London: Verso, 269–322.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (1997), Aesthetic Theory, trans. R. Hullot-Kentor, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. ([1957] 1999a), ‘Alban Berg’, in Sound Figures, trans. R. Livingstone, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 69–79.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. ([1959] 1999b), ‘Anton von Webern’, in Sound Figures, trans. R. Livingstone, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, T. W. ([1957] 1999c), ‘Criteria of New Music’, in Sound Figures, trans. R. Livingstone, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 145–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, T. W. ([1955] 2002), ‘The Aging of the New Music’, trans. R. Hullot-Kentor and F. Will, in Adorno on Music, ed. Leppert, R., Berkeley: University of California Press, 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (2007), Negative Dialectics, trans. E. B. Ashton, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. ([1951] 2015), ‘Vortrag über Anton von Webern am 5. Juli 1951’, in Schwarz, M. (ed.), ‘Über Anton von Webern: Theodor W. Adorno bei den Darmstädter Ferienkursen 1951’, Musik und Ästhetik, 19:2, 5–20, at 14–20.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. and Berg, A. (2005), Theodor W. Adorno and Alban Berg: Correspondence 1925–1935, ed. Lonitz, H., trans. W. Hoban, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Aerts, H. (2000), TRANSIT Leuven New Music Festival [Programme].Google Scholar

Ahrend, T. (2017), ‘“ … einen Roman durch eine einzige Geste … ausdrücken … ”: Affekt- und Kristallklänge bei Anton Webern’, Musiktheorie, 31:1, 21–41.Google Scholar

Ahrend, T. (2018), ‘Anton Webern’, in Heister, H.-W. and Sparrer, W.-W. (eds.), Komponisten der Gegenwart, Munich: text + kritik, 1–49.Google Scholar

Aksiuk, S. (1961), ‘Razvorachivaisia v marshe, muzyka!’, Sovetskaia kul’tura, 4 November, 3.Google Scholar

Alegant, B. (2010), The Twelve-Tone Music of Luigi Dallapiccola, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrusik, S. (2017), ‘Kompozitor Vitalii Godziatskii: V 1960-kh my iskali fizikov – tol’ko oni nas i ponimali’, Ukraïns’ka Pravda, 30 March, https://life.pravda.com.ua/culture/2017/03/30/223452/.Google Scholar

Ansari, E. A. (2018), The Sound of a Superpower: Musical Americanism and the Cold War, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asai, Y. (2021), Anton Webern: Komponieren als Problemstellung, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashby, A. (1995), ‘Of Modell-Typen and Reihenformen: Berg, Schoenberg, F. H. Klein, and the Concept of Row Derivation’, Journal of the American Musicological Society, 48:1, 67–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashby, A. (2001), ‘Schoenberg, Boulez, and Twelve-Tone Composition as “Ideal Type”’, Journal of the American Musicological Society, 54:3, 585–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashby, A. (2002), ‘Reading Berg’, Music Analysis, 21:3, 383–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Assis, G. O. A. (2016), ‘Structure and Exception: Evaluating the Concept of Einschub in Stockhausen’s Compositional Process’, in Grant, M. J. and Misch, I. (eds.), The Musical Legacy of Karlheinz Stockhausen: Looking Back and Forward, Hofheim: Wolke, 79–89.Google Scholar

Astor, M. (2008), ‘Los Ojos de Sojo: El Conflicto entre Nacionalismo y Modernidad en los Festivales de Música de Caracas (1954–1966)’, PhD thesis, Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar

Auner, J. (1999), ‘The Second Viennese School as a Historical Concept’, in Simms, B. (ed.), Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern: A Companion to the Second Viennese School, Westport: Greenwood, 1–36.Google Scholar

Babadzhanian, A. (1965), Chetyre p’esy; Tokkata; Shest’ kartin, Mezhdunarodnaia kniga LP, D1560-15602.Google Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1955), ‘Some Aspects of Twelve-Tone Composition’, The Score, 12, 53–61.Google Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1958), ‘Who Cares If You Listen?’, High Fidelity, 8:2, 38–40.Google Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1960), ‘Twelve-Tone Invariants as Compositional Determinants’, The Musical Quarterly, 46:2, 246–59.Google Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1961), ‘Set Structure as a Compositional Determinant’, Journal of Music Theory, 5:1, 72–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1962), ‘Twelve-Tone Rhythmic Structure and the Electronic Medium’, Perspectives of New Music, 1:1, 49–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1964), ‘An Introduction to the RCA Synthesizer’, Journal of Music Theory, 8:2, 251–65.Google Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1965), ‘The Revolution in Sound: Electronic Music’, Music Journal, 18:7, 34–7.Google Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1970), ‘On Relata I’, in Hines, R. S. (ed.), The Orchestral Composer’s Point of View, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 11–38.Google Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1971), ‘Contemporary Music Composition and Music Theory as Contemporary Intellectual History’, in Brook, B. S., Downes, E. O. D., and van Solkema, S. J. (eds.), Perspectives in Musicology, New York: Norton, 151–84.Google Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1973–4), ‘Since Schoenberg’, Perspectives of New Music, 12:1–2, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1976), ‘Responses: A First Approximation’, Perspectives of New Music, 14:2–15.1, 3–23.Google Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1987a), ‘Stravinsky’s Verticals and Schoenberg’s Diagonals: A Twist of Fate’, in Haimo, E. and Johnson, P. (eds.), Stravinsky’s Retrospectives, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 15–35.Google Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1987b), Words about Music, ed. Dembski, S. and Straus, J. N., Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Babbitt, M. (1999), ‘My Vienna Triangle at Washington Square Revisited and Dilated’, in Brinkmann, R. and Wolff, C. (eds.), Driven into Paradise: The Musical Migration from Nazi Germany to the United States, Berkeley: University of California Press, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babbitt, M. (2003), The Collected Essays of Milton Babbitt, ed. Peles, S., with Dembski, S., Mead, A., and Straus, J., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babcock, D. (1995), ‘Korean Composers in Profile’, Tempo, 192, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, J. (1962), ‘Die Reihe: A Scientific Evaluation’, Perspectives of New Music, 1:1, 160–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baehr, P. (2016), ‘Community of Fate’, in Ritzer, G (ed.), Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos0728.Google Scholar

Bailey, K. (1991), The Twelve-Note Music of Anton Webern: Old Forms in a New Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, K. (1995), ‘Rhythm and Metre in Webern’s Late Works’, Journal of the Royal Musical Society, 20:2, 251–80.Google Scholar

Bailey, K. (1998), The Life of Webern, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, N. (1999), ‘Alban Berg, Richard Wagner, and the Leitmotivs of Symmetry’, 19th-Century Music, 23:1, 62–83.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, N. (2004), ‘Fin-de-Siècle Wagner: Parsifal Analysed through Berg’s Programme to Mahler’s Ninth Symphony’, Music Analysis, 23:1, 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barraqué, J. (1962), ‘Debussy ou l’approche d’une organisation autogène de la composition’, in Weber, E. (ed.), Debussy et l’évolution de la musique au XX^e siècle, Paris: CNRS, 83–96.Google Scholar

Barraqué, J. (2001), ‘La mer de Debussy, ou la naissance des formes ouvertes. Essai de méthodologie comparative: la forme musicale considérée non plus comme un archétype mais comme un devenir’, in Feneyrou, L. (ed.), Jean Barraqué: Écrits, Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 277–386.Google Scholar

Bartók, B. (1920), ‘Das Problem der neuen Musik’, Melos, 1, 107.Google Scholar

Barzun, J. (1964), Liner notes to Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center, Columbia Masterworks LP, ML 5966.Google Scholar

Bassetto, L. (2003), ‘Orient-Accident? Pli selon pli, ou l’“eurexcentrisme” selon Boulez’, in Albèra, P. (ed.), Pli selon pli de Pierre Boulez: Entretien et études, Geneva: Contrechamps, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassetto, L. (2014), ‘Ritratto del compositore come apprendista etnologo: Pierre Boulez prima dell’incontro con André Schaeffner’, Musicalia: Annuario Internazionale di Studi Musicologici, 7, 61–82.Google Scholar

Bauer-Mengelberg, S. and Ferentz, G. (1965), ‘On Eleven-Interval Twelve-Tone Rows’, Perspectives of New Music, 3:2, 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bazayev, I. (2009), ‘Composing with Circles, Spirals, and Lines of Fifths: Harmony and Voice Leading in the Works of Nicolai Roslavets’, PhD dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar

Beal, A. (2000), ‘Negotiating Cultural Allies: American Music in Darmstadt, 1946–1956’, Journal of the American Musicological Society, 53:1, 105–39.Google Scholar

Becker, H. (1927), ‘Béla Bartók and his Credo’, Musical America, 17 December, 35.Google Scholar

Béhague, G. (1979), Music in Latin America: An Introduction, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Béhague, G. (2001), ‘Guarnieri, (Mozart) Camargo’, Grove Music Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.11904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benitez, V. (2009), ‘Reconsidering Messiaen as Serialist’, Music Analysis, 28:2–3, 267–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, A. ([1926] 2014), ‘Composition with Twelve Tones’, in A. Berg and B. R. Simms, Pro Mundo-Pro Domo: The Writings of Alban Berg, New York: Oxford University Press, 203–5.Google Scholar

Berg, A. and Schoenberg, A. (1987), The Berg–Schoenberg Correspondence: Selected Letters, ed. Brand, J., Hailey, C., and Harris, D., New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Berg, E. A. (1985), Das unverbesserliche Romantiker: Alban Berg 1885–1935, Vienna: Österreichischer Bundesverlag.Google Scholar

Berio, L. (1985), Two Interviews, with R. Dalmonte and B. A. Varga, trans. and ed. Osmand-Smith, D., New York: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar

Berio, L. (1998), Liner note to Luciano Berio: Sequenzas, Ensemble InterContemporain, 3 CDs, Deutsche Grammophon 457 038-2.Google Scholar

Berio, L. (2013a), ‘Aspetti di un artigianato formale’, in De Benedictis, A. I. (ed.), Scritti sulla musica, Turin: Einaudi, 237–52.Google Scholar

De Benedictis, A. I. (2013b), ‘Poesia e musica: un’esperienza’, in De Benedictis, A. I. (ed.), Scritti sulla musica, Turin: Einaudi, 253–66.Google Scholar

Bernard, J. W. (1990), ‘An Interview with Elliott Carter’, Perspectives of New Music, 28, 180–214.Google Scholar

Bernstein, L. (1967), The Joy of Music, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Z. (2016), ‘The Problem of Completeness in Milton Babbitt’s Music and Thought’, Music Theory Spectrum, 38:2, 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biuletyn Informacyiny ZKP [Polish Composers’ Union’s Information Bulletin] (1963), June–November.Google Scholar

Blumröder, C. von (1993), Die Grundlegung der Musik Karlheinz Stockhausens, Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar

Blumröder, C. (1995), ‘Serielle Musik’, in Eggebrecht, H. H. (ed.), Terminologie der Musik im 20. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart: F. Steiner, 396–411.Google Scholar

Boivin, J. (1995), La classe de Messiaen, Paris: Christian Bourgeois.Google Scholar

Borio, G. (1993), Musikalische Avantgarde um 1960: Entwurf einer Theorie der informellen Musik, Laaber: Laaber.Google Scholar

Borio, G. (2004), ‘Tempo e ritmo nelle composizioni seriali, 1952–1956’, in Borio, G., Morelli, F., and Rizzardi, V. (eds.), Le musiche degli anni Cinquanta, Florence: Olschki, 61–115.Google Scholar

Borio, G. (2006), ‘Dire cela, sans savoir quoi: The Question of Meaning in Adorno and in the Musical Avant-Garde’, in Hoeckner, B. (ed.), Apparitions: New Perspectives on Adorno and Twentieth-Century Music, New York: Routledge, 41–67.Google Scholar

Borio, G. (2009), ‘Finne dell’esotismo: l’infiltrazione dell’Altro nella musica d’arte dell’Occidente’, in Ginnattasio, F. and Facci, S. (eds.), L’etnomusicologia e le musiche contemporanee, Venice: Fondazione Cini. www.cini.it/pubblicazioni/letnomusicologia-e-le-musiche-contemporanee-it.Google Scholar

Ginnattasio, F. and Facci, S. (2013a), ‘The End of Exoticism or The Infiltration of the Other into Western Art Music: Boulez, Debussy, Kagel, Varèse and the Development of Musical Thought’, Paper presented at the Italian Academy for Advanced Studies in America, New York, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Ginnattasio, F. and Facci, S. (2013b), ‘Sound as Process: Giacinto Scelsi and the Composers of Nuova Consonanza’, in Sciannameo, F. and Pellegrini, A. C. (eds.), Music as Dream: Essays on Giacinto Scelsi, Lanham: Scarecrow, 46–9.Google Scholar

Borio, G. and Danuser, H. (1997), Im Zenit der Moderne: Die Internationalen Ferienkurse für Neue Musik Darmstadt 1946–1966, Freiburg im Breisgau: Rombach.Google Scholar

Born, G. (1995), Rationalizing Culture: IRCAM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the Musical Avant-Garde, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Boros, J. (1990), ‘Shattering the Vessels of Received Wisdom: Brian Ferneyhough in Interview’, Perspectives of New Music, 28:2, 6–45.Google Scholar

Boss, J. (2014), Schoenberg’s Twelve-Tone Music: Symmetry and the Musical Idea, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulez, P. (1952), ‘Schoenberg Is Dead’, The Score, 6, 18–22.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1966a), ‘Schönberg est mort’, in Relevés d’apprenti, Paris: Seuil, 265–72.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1966b), ‘Stravinsky demeure’, in Relevés d’apprenti, Paris: Seuil, 75–146.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1967), ‘Musiques traditionnelles: un paradis perdu?’, The World of Music: revue du Conseil International de la Musique à l’UNESCO, 9:2, Kassel: Bärenreiter, 3–10.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1971), On Music Today, trans. S. Bradshaw and R. R. Bennett, London: Faber.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1976), Pierre Boulez: Conversations with Célestin Deliège, trans. B. Hopkins, London: Eulenburg.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1984), ‘Existe-t-il un conflit entre la pensée européenne et non-européenne?’, in Oesch, H., Arlt, W., and Haas, M. (eds.), Europäische Musik zwischen Nationalismus und Exotik, Winterthur: Amadeus, 131–45.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1986a), ‘Necessité d’un orientation esthétique (II)’, Canadian University Music Review, 7, 46–79.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1986b), ‘Poetry – Centre and Absence – Music’, in Orientations, trans. M. Cooper, London: Faber & Faber, 183–98.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1986c), ‘Sonate, que me veux-tu?’, in Orientations, trans. M. Cooper, London: Faber & Faber, 143–54.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1986d), ‘Speaking, Playing, Singing’, in Orientations, trans. M. Cooper, London: Faber & Faber, 330–43.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1991a), ‘Bach’s Moment’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. Thévenin, P., trans. S. Walsh, Oxford: Clarendon, 1–14.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1991b), ‘Current Investigations’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. by Thévenin, P., trans. S. Walsh, Oxford: Clarendon, 15–19.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1991c), ‘Entries for a Musical Encyclopedia: Series’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. Thévenin, P., trans. S. Walsh, Oxford: Clarendon, 234–6.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1991d), ‘ … Near and Far’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. Thévenin, P., trans. S. Walsh, Oxford: Clarendon, 141–57.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1991e), ‘Possibly … ’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. Thévenin, P., trans. S. Walsh, Oxford: Clarendon, 111–40.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1991f), ‘Schoenberg Is Dead’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. Thévenin, P., trans. S. Walsh, Oxford: Clarendon, 209–14.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1991g), ‘Tendencies in Recent Music’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. Thévenin, P., trans. S. Walsh, Oxford: Clarendon, 173–79.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1991h), ‘Trajectories: Ravel, Stravinsky, Schoenberg’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. Thévenin, P., trans. S. Walsh, Oxford: Clarendon, 188–208.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1991i), ‘Corruption in the Censers’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. Thévenin, P., trans. S. Walsh, Oxford: Clarendon, 20–6.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1991j), ‘Alea’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. Thévenin, P., trans. S. Walsh, Oxford: Clarendon, 26–38.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (1991k), ‘Anton Webern’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. Thévenin, P., trans. S. Walsh, Oxford: Clarendon, 293–303.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. (2004), ‘On My Structures For Two Pianos (1952)’, trans. O. Laske, Sonus, 24:2, 77–97.Google Scholar

Boulez, P. ([1992–93] 2018), ‘Writing and Idea’, in Dunsby, J., Goldman, J., and Whittall, A. (eds. and trans.), Music Lessons: The Collège de France Lectures, London: Faber & Faber, 560–91.Google Scholar

Boynton, N. (2002), ‘Anton Webern, Variationen op. 27: Gegenüberstellung der Handexemplare von Else Cross und Peter Stadlen’, in Grassl, M. and Kapp, R. (eds.), Die Lehre von der musikalischen Aufführung in der Wiener Schule, Vienna: Böhlau, 101–11.Google Scholar

Boynton, N. (2009), ‘Some Remarks on Anton Webern’s “Variations” Opus 27’, in Schweiber, D. and Urbanek, N. (eds.), webern_21, Vienna: Böhlau, 199–219.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, S. (1986), ‘The Instrumental and Vocal Music’, in Glock, W. (ed.), Pierre Boulez: A Symposium, London: Eulenberg, 127–230.Google Scholar

Brewster, B. and Broughton, F. ([1999] 2006), Last Night a DJ Saved My Life: The History of the Disc Jockey, New York: Grove.Google Scholar

Brilliant, M. (1964), ‘Stravinsky Work Coolly Received’, New York Times, 24 August, 23.Google Scholar

Brody, J. and Oncley, L. (1968), ‘Current Chronicle: Bloomington, Indiana’, The Musical Quarterly, 54, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brody, M. (1993), ‘“Music for the Masses”: Milton Babbitt’s Cold War Music Theory’, The Musical Quarterly, 77:2, 161–92.Google Scholar

Brown, S. (2015), ‘Twelve-Tone Rows and Aggregate Melodies in the Music of Shostakovich’, Journal of Music Theory, 59:2, 191–234.Google Scholar

Buch, E. (2007), ‘L’avant-garde musicale à Buenos Aires: Paz contra Ginastera’, Circuit: Musiques contemporaines, 17:2, https://doi.org/10.7202/016836ar.Google Scholar

Buchler, M. H. (2007), ‘Reconsidering Klumpenhouwer Networks’, Music Theory Online, 13:2. www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.07.13.2/mto.07.13.2.buchler.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, P. (2006), The Music of Tōru Takemitsu, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Busch, R. (1985), ‘On the Horizontal and Vertical Presentation of Musical Ideas and on Musical Space (I)’, trans. M. Graubart, Tempo, 154, 2–10.Google Scholar

Busch, R. (2020), ‘Bemerkungen zum Klavierstück M 277 im Kontext des Skizzenbuch Nr. 1’, Journal of the Arnold Schönberg Center, 17, 211–9.Google Scholar

Butler, M. (2006), Unlocking the Groove: Rhythm, Meter, and Musical Design in Electronic Dance Music, Bloomington: Indiana Press.Google Scholar

Butler, M. (2014), Playing with Something that Runs: Technology, Improvisation, and Composition in DJ and Laptop Performance, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cage, J. (1961), ‘To Describe the Process of Composition Used in Music of Changes and Imaginary Landscape No. 4’, in Silence, Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 57–9.Google Scholar

Cagney, L. (2019), ‘Vers une écriture liminale: Serialism, Spectralism and Écriture in the Transitional Music of Gérard Grisey’, in Heile, B. and Wilson, C. (eds.), The Routledge Research Companion to Modernism in Music, London: Routledge, 400–26.Google Scholar

Cairns, P. (2010), ‘Interview with Composer George Rochberg’, http://artistprofilesproject.blogspot.ca/2010/01/interview-with-composer-george-rochberg.html. Accessed 19 September 2015.Google Scholar

Cairns, Z. (2012), ‘Svetlana Kurbatskaya on Serial Music: Twelve Categories of “Twelve-Toneness”’, Gamut, 5:1, 99–132.Google Scholar

Cairns, Z. (2013), ‘Edison Denisov’s Second Conservatory: Analysis and Implementation’, Indiana Theory Review, 31:1–2, 52–87.Google Scholar

Campbell, E. (2010), Boulez, Music and Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, E. (2016), ‘Pierre Boulez: Composer, Traveller, Correspondent’, in Campbell, E. and O’Hagan, P. (eds.), Pierre Boulez Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–24.Google Scholar

Carlos, W. (n.d.), ‘Interesting Miscellany’, www.wendycarlos.com/resources.html#PDFs. Accessed 31 July 2020.Google Scholar

Carpenter, P. (1983), ‘Grundgestalt as Tonal Function’, Music Theory Spectrum, 5, 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, M. A. (2002), Multiple Masks: Neoclassicism in Stravinsky’s Works on Greek Subjects, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Carr, M. A. (2014), After the Rite: Stravinsky’s Path to Neoclassicism (1914–1925), New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, M. (2006), Music and Ideology in Cold War Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carter, C. (1997), ‘Roland MC8’, Sound on Sound, https://web.archive.org/web/20150924115650/http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/1997_articles/mar97/rolandmc8.html. Accessed 7 September 2020.Google Scholar

Carter, E. (1971), ‘Expressionism and American Music’, in Boretz, B. and Cone, E. T. (eds.), Perspectives on American Composers, New York: WW Norton, 217–29.Google Scholar

Cartwright, D. (1999), ‘Schopenhauer’s Narrower Sense of Morality’, in Janaway, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 252–92.Google Scholar

Chafe, E. (2000), Analyzing Bach Cantatas, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chang, H. K. H. (2020), ‘Yun Isang, Media, and the State: Forgetting and Remembering a Dissident Composer in Cold-War South Korea’, The Asia-Pacific Journal, 18–19:3, https://apjjf.org/2020/19/Chang.html.Google Scholar

Chang, J. (2005), Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop: A History of the Hip-Hop Generation, New York: Picador.Google Scholar

Chang, P. (1991), ‘Tan Dun’s String Quartet Feng-Ya-Song: Some Ideological Issues’, Asian Music, 22:2, 127–58.Google Scholar

Cheong, W.-L. (2016), ‘Reading Schoenberg, Hindemith, and Kurth in Sang Tong (桑桐): Modernist Harmonic Approaches in China’, Acta Musicologica, 88:1, 87–108.Google Scholar

Choi, H. (2009), Gender and Mission Encounters in Korea: New Women, Old Ways, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Christensen, E. (2004), ‘Overt and Hidden Process in 20th-Century Music’, Axiomathes, 14, 97–117.Google Scholar

Clarke, D. (1993), ‘Parting Glances’, Musical Times, 134, 680–4.Google Scholar

Cline, D. (2019), ‘Two Concepts of Indeterminacy in Music’, The Musical Quarterly, 102:1, 82–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocteau, J. (1926), Le rappel à l’ordre, Paris: Stock.Google Scholar

‘Composers Tan Dun and Chen Qigang discuss their membership in the Class of 1978’ (2009), in Ancient Paths, Modern Voices, http://chinafestival.carnegiehall.org/events/13082.aspx#video. Accessed 1 November 2021.Google Scholar

Cone, E. T. (1968), ‘Conversation with Aaron Copland’, Perspectives of New Music, 6, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cone, E. T. (1971a), ‘Conversation with Aaron Copland’, in Boretz, B. and Cone, E. T. (eds.), Perspectives on American Composers, New York: WW Norton, 131–46.Google Scholar

Cone, E. T. (1971b), ‘Conversation with Roger Sessions’, in Boretz, B. and Cone, E. T. (eds.), Perspectives on American Composers, New York: WW Norton, 90–107.Google Scholar

Cook, N. (2017), ‘Inventing Tradition: Webern’s Piano Variations in Early Recordings’, Music Analysis, 36:2, 163–215.Google Scholar

Copland, A. and Perlis, V. (1989), Copland: Since 1943, New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar

Corrado, O. (2012), Vanguardias al sur: la música de Juan Carlos Paz, Bernal: Editorial Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.Google Scholar

Cott, J. (1974), Stockhausen: Conversations with the Composer, London: Robson.Google Scholar

Covach, J. (2017), ‘Schoenberg’s (Analytical) Gaze: Musical Time, The Organic Ideal, and Analytical Perspectivism’, Theory and Practice, 42, 141–59.Google Scholar

Craft, R. (1956), ‘A Concert for Saint Mark’, The Score, 8, 35–45.Google Scholar

Craft, R. (1992), Stravinsky: Glimpses of a Life, New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Dahlhaus, C. (1983a), Foundations of Music History, trans. J. B. Robinson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dahlhaus, C. (1983b), ‘Die Krise des Experiments’, in Jost, E. (ed.), Komponieren Heute: Ästhetische, soziologische und pädagogische Fragen, Mainz: Schott, 80–94.Google Scholar

Dahlhaus, C. (1987), ‘A Rejection of Material Thinking?’, in Schoenberg and the New Music, trans. D. Puffett and A. Clayton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 274–87.Google Scholar

Dahlhaus, C. (2007), ‘Das “postserielle” Jahrzehnt’, in Danuser, H., Hinrichsen, H.-J., and Plebusch, T. (eds.), Gesammelte Schriften. 10: Varia, Laaber: Laaber, 517–21.Google Scholar

Dal Molin, P. (2006), ‘“Sans cause extérieure apparente, ni affluents, ni glaciers, ni orages” … La construction de l’hétérophonie dans les versets de Rituel’, in Decroupet, P. and Leleu, J.-L. (eds.), Pierre Boulez: Techniques d’écriture et enjeux esthétiques, Geneva: Contrechamps, 157–76.Google Scholar

Dal Molin, P. (2007), ‘Introduction à la famille d’oeuvres … explosante-fixe … de Pierre Boulez: Étude philologique’, PhD dissertation, Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis.Google Scholar

Dal Molin, P. (2009), ‘Mémoriale de Pierre Boulez: Ce que les sources (ne) nous disent (pas)’, Revue de Musicologie, 95:2, 475–523.Google Scholar

Dal Molin, P. (2016), ‘Composing an Improvisation at the Beginning of the 1970s’, in Campbell, E. and O’Hagan, P. (eds.), Pierre Boulez Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 270–300.Google Scholar

Dallapiccola, L. (1951), ‘On the Twelve-Note Road’, trans. Deryck Cooke, Music Survey, 4, 318–32.Google Scholar

Daunoravičienė, G. (2017), ‘Die Rezeption der Wiener Schule in Litauen’, in Loos, H. (ed.), Musikgeschichte in Mittel- und Osteuropa, 20 vols., Leipzig: Gudrun Schröder, xix, 343–404.Google Scholar

Daunoravičienė, G. (2018), ‘Compositional System of Osvaldas Balakauskas: An Attempt to Restore the Theoretical Discourse’, Musicological Annual, 54:2, 46–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Benedictis, A. I. (2004), ‘Gruppo, linea e proiezioni armoniche: Continuità e trasformazione della tecnica all’inizio degli anni Sessanta’, in Borio, G., Morelli, F., and Rizzardi, V. (eds.), Le musiche degli anni Cinquanta, Florence: Olschki, 183–226.Google Scholar

De Benedictis, A. I. (2006), ‘“Can the Text Itself Become Music?”: On the Relationship between Text and Music in Luigi Nono’s Vocal Works of the 1960s’, Ex Tempore: A Journal of Compositional and Theoretical Research in Music, 13:1, 24–48.Google Scholar

De Benedictis, A. I. (2012), ‘The Dramaturgical and Compositional Genesis of Luigi Nono’s Intolleranza 1960’, Twentieth-Century Music, 9:1–2, 101–41.Google Scholar

De Benedictis, A. I. and Rizzardi, V. (2018a), ‘Introduction’, in Nostalgia for the Future: Luigi Nono’s Selected Writings and Interviews, ed. De Benedictis, A. I. and Rizzardi, V., Oakland: University of California Press, 1–22.Google Scholar

De Benedictis, A. I. and Rizzardi, V. (2018b), ‘On Some Difficulties in the Collection and Edition of the Writings of Luigi Nono’, Musica/Realtà, 115, 137–59.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. (1995a), ‘Rätsel der Zahlen-Quadrate: Funktion und Permutation in der seriellen Musik von Boulez und Stockhausen’, Positionen: Beiträge zur neuen Musik, 23, 25–9.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. (1995b), ‘Renverser la vapeur … : Zu Musikdenken und Kompositionen von Boulez in den fünfziger Jahren’, Musik-Konzepte, 89–90, 112–31.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. (1997), ‘Konzepter serieller Musik’, in Borio, G. and Danuser, H. (eds.), Im Zenit der Moderne: Die Internationale Ferienkurse für Neue Musik Darmstadt 1946–1966, Freiburg: Rombach, i, 285–425.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. (2003a), ‘Comment Boulez pense sa musique au début des années soixante’, in Albèra, P. (ed.), Pli selon pli de Pierre Boulez: Entretien et études, Geneva: Contrechamps, 49–57.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. (2003b), ‘“Omnia tempus habent”: quelques réflexions sur la longévité démesurée de certains stéréotypes au sujet de la musique sérielle’, in Borio, G. (ed.), L’orizzonte filosofico del comporre nel ventesimo secolo / The Philosophical Horizon of Composition in the Twentieth Century, Bologna: Il Mulino, 99–112.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. (ed.) (2005), Pierre Boulez: Le Marteau sans maître: Facsimile of the Draft Score and the First Fair Copy of the Full Score, Mainz: Schott.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. (2006), ‘Moments doubles, figures en prisme’, in Decroupet, P. and Leleu, J.-L. (eds.), Pierre Boulez: Techniques d’écriture et enjeux esthétiques, Geneva: Contrechamps, 133–57.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. (2011), ‘Ästhetik im Schlepptau der Technik’, in Delaere, M. (ed.), Rewriting Recent Music History: The Development of Early Serialism, 1947–1957, Leuven: Peeters, 27–43.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. (2012), ‘Le rôle des clés et algorithms dans le décryptage analytique: L’example des musiques sérielles de Pierre Boulez, Karlheinz Stockhausen et Bernd Alois Zimmermann’, Revue de musicologie, 98:1, 221–46.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. (2016), ‘Serial Organisation and Beyond: Cross-Relations of Determinants in Le Marteau sans maître and the Dynamic Pitch-Algorithm of “Constellation”’, in Campbell, E. and O’Hagan, P. (eds.), Pierre Boulez Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 108–38.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. and Leleu, J.-L. (2006), Pierre Boulez: Techniques d’écriture et enjeux esthétiques, Geneva: Contrechamps.Google Scholar

Decroupet, P. and Ungeheuer, E. (1998), ‘Through the Sensory Looking-Glass: The Aesthetic and Serial Foundations of Gesang der Jünglinge’, Perspectives of New Music, 36:1, 97–142.Google Scholar

Deguchi, T. (2019), ‘Tōru Takemitsu’s “Spherical Mirror”: The Influences of Shūzō Takiguchi and Fumio Hayasaka on His Early Music in Postwar Japan’, Athens Journal of Humanities & Arts, 6:4, 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delaere, M. (1996), ‘Karel Goeyvaerts: A Belgian Pioneer of Serial, Electronic and Minimal Music’, Tempo, 195, 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delaere, M. (1998), Nieuwe Muziek in Vlaanderen, Bruges: Het Kunstboek.Google Scholar

Delaere, M. (2002), ‘Olivier Messiaen’s Analysis Seminar and the Development of Post-War Serial Music’, Music Analysis, 21:1, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delaere, M. (ed.) (2010), Karel Goeyvaerts: Selbstlose Musik: Texte—Briefe—Gespräche, Cologne: MusikTexte.Google Scholar

Delaere, M. (2011), Rewriting Recent Music History: The Development of Early Serialism, 1947–1957, Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1997), Difference and Repetition, trans. P. Patton, London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Denisov, E. (1969), ‘Dodekafoniia i problemy sovremennoi kompozitorskoi tekhniki’, Muzyka i sovremennost, 6, 478–525.Google Scholar

Denisov, E. (1999), ‘Za ob’ektivnost’ i spravedlivost’ v otsenke sovremennoi muzyki’, in Tsenova, V. (ed.), Svet-dobro-vechnost’: Pamiati Edisona Denisova, stat’i, vospominaniia, materialy, Moscow: Moskovskaia gosudarstvennaia konservatoriia im. P. I. Chaikovskogo, 22–33.Google Scholar

Denisov, E. and Shul’gin, D. (2004), Priznanie Edisona Denisova: Po materialam besed, Moscow: Kompozitor.Google Scholar

Downes, O. (1941), ‘Problems of Adjustment: Clashing Interests between Native Musicians and Refugees Come to America from Overseas’, New York Times, 19 January, X7.Google Scholar

Drees, S. (2003), ‘Renaissance-Musik als Inspirationsquelle für das Komponieren Bruno Madernas und Luigi Nonos’, in Dobszay, L. (ed.), The Past in the Present: Papers Read at the IMS Intercongressional Symposium and the 10th Meeting of the Cantus Planus, Budapest & Visegrád, 2000, Budapest: Liszt Ferenc Academy of Music, 545–58.Google Scholar

Dubinets, E. (2010), Kniaz’ Andrei Volkonskii. Partitura zhizni, Moscow: Ripol klassik.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1989), ‘The Poetics of the Open Work’, trans. B. Merry, in Robey, D. (ed.), The Open Work, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1–23.Google Scholar

Egg, A. (2006), ‘A Carta Aberta de Camarga Guarnieri’, Revista Científica/FAP, 1, http://periodicos.unespar.edu.br/index.php/revistacientifica/article/view/1735.Google Scholar

Eimert, H. (1950), Lehrbuch der Zwölftontechnik, Wiesbaden: Breitkopf and Härtel.Google Scholar

Eimert, H. (1955), ‘Die notwendige Korrektur’, Die Reihe, 2, 35–41.Google Scholar

Eimert, H. (1958), ‘What Is Electronic Music?’, Die Reihe, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar

Eimert, H. (1959), ‘A Change of Focus’, Die Reihe, 2, 29–36.Google Scholar

Emmery, L. (2019), ‘Elliot Carter’s and Luigi Nono’s Analyses of Schoenberg’s Variations for Orchestra, Op. 31: Divergent Approaches to Serialism’, Twentieth-Century Music, 16:2, 191–229.Google Scholar

Ertlet, T. (1993), Alban Bergs Lulu: Quellenstudien und Beiträge zur Analyse, Vienna: Universal.Google Scholar

Erbe, M. (2004), ‘Karlheinz Stockhausens Telemusik’, in von Blümroder, C. (ed.), Kompositorische Stationen des 20. Jahrhunderts: Debussy, Webern, Messiaen, Boulez, Cage, Ligeti, Stockhausen, Höller, Bayle, Münster: Lit, 129–71.Google Scholar

Erwin, M. (2019), ‘Roadmap to Total Control: A Critical Chronology, Work List, and Legacy for Herman Van San’, Revue belge de musicology / Belgisch tijdschrift voor muziekwetenschap, 73, 173–200.Google Scholar

Erwin, M. (2020), ‘An Apprenticeship and Its Stocktakings: Leibowitz, Boulez, Messiaen, and the Discourse and Practice of New Music’, Twentieth-Century Music, 18:1, 71–93.Google Scholar

Eshun, K. (1998), More Brilliant Than the Sun: Adventures in Sonic Fiction, London: Quartet.Google Scholar

Estenssoro, J. C. (2001), ‘Iturriaga, Enrique’, Grove Music Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.13988.Google Scholar

Etheridge, K. (2014), ‘Japanese Musical Modanizumu: Interwar Yōgaku Composers and Modernism’, PhD dissertation, Florida State University.Google Scholar

Everett, Y. U. (2004), ‘Intercultural Synthesis in Postwar Western Art Music: Historical Contexts, Perspectives, and Taxonomy’, in Everett, Y. U. and Lau, F. (eds.), Locating East Asia in Western Art Music, Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

Faure, M. (1962), ‘Entretien avec Luciano Berio’, Les Lettres Nouvelles, 22, 128–40.Google Scholar

Fearn, R. (1990), Bruno Maderna, Chur: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar

Feisst, S. (2011), Schoenberg’s New World: The American Years, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fineberg, J. (2000), ‘Spectral Music’, Contemporary Music Review, 19:2, 1–5.Google Scholar

Fink, R. (2005a), Repeating Ourselves: American Minimalism as Cultural Practice, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fink, R. (2005b), ‘The Story of ORCH5, or, the Classical Ghost in the Hip Hop Machine,” Popular Music, 24:4, 1–18.Google Scholar

Floros, C. (1994), Alban Berg: Musik als Autobiographie, Wiesbaden: Breitkopf and Härtel.Google Scholar

Floros, C., Berg, A., and Fuchs, H. (2008), Alban Berg and Hanna Fuchs: The Story of a Love in Letters, trans. E. Bernhardt-Kabisch, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Folio, C. (1985), ‘The Synthesis of Traditional and Contemporary Elements in Joseph Schwantner’s Sparrows’, Perspectives of New Music, 24:1, 184–96.Google Scholar

Forte, A. (1973), The Structure of Atonal Music, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fugellie, D. (2018), ‘Musik unserer Zeit’: Internationale Avantgarde, Migration und Wiener Schule in Südamerika, Munich: text + kritik.Google Scholar

Gagne, C. and Caras, T. (1982), Soundpieces: Interviews with American Composers, Metuchen: Scarecrow.Google Scholar

Galliano, L. (2002), Yogaku: Japanese Music in the Twentieth Century, Lanham: Scarecrow.Google Scholar

Galliano, L. (2018), Music of Joji Yuasa, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Gann, Kyle (2006), ‘Let X = X: Minimalism versus Serialism’ (1987), in Music Downtown: Writings from the Village Voice, Berkeley: University of California Press, 147–49.Google Scholar

Gertner, J. (2012), The Idea Factory: Bell Labs and the Great Age of American Innovation, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Gerzso, A. (1984), ‘Reflections on Répons’, Contemporary Music Review, 1, 23–34.Google Scholar

Geuss, R. (1997), ‘Berg and Adorno’, in Pople, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berg, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glock, W. (1952), ‘Comment’, The Score, 6, 3–6.Google Scholar

Glock, W. (ed.) (1986), Pierre Boulez: A Symposium, London: Eulenberg.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. ([1979] 2005), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Girard, A. (2007), ‘Music Theory in the American Academy’, PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Gluck, R. J. (2007), ‘The Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center: Educating International Composers’, Computer Music Journal, 31:2, 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goeyvaerts, K. (1994), ‘Paris–Darmstadt: Excerpt from the Autobiographical Portrait’, Revue belge de Musicologie, 48, 35–54.Google Scholar

Goeyvaerts, K. ([1957] 2010a), ‘Die Kompositionstechnik im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert in ihrer Beziehung zur Gegenwart’, in Delaere, M. (ed.), Karel Goeyvaerts: Selbstlose Musik: Texte—Briefe—Gespräche, Cologne: MusikTexte, 158–63.Google Scholar

Goeyvaerts, K. (2010b), Selbstlose Musik: Texte, Briefe, Gespräche, ed. Delaere, Mark, Cologne: MusikTexte.Google Scholar

Gojowy, D. (1980), Neue sowjetische Musik der 20er Jahre, Laaber: Laaber.Google Scholar

Gojowy, D. and Kolesnikov, A. Y. (2001), ‘Golïshev, Yefim’, Grove Music Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.11405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gołąb, M. (2004), Józef Koffler: Compositional Style and Source Documents, Los Angeles: Polish Music Center USC.Google Scholar

Goldman, J. (2011), The Musical Language of Pierre Boulez: Writings and Compositions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gorbanevskaia, N. (1967), ‘Valentin Sil’vestrov: Vyiti iz zamknutogo prostranstva … ’, Iunost’, 9, 100–1.Google Scholar

Gould, G. (1956), ‘The Dodecaphonist’s Dilemma’, Canadian Music Journal, 1, 20–9.Google Scholar

Granat, Z. (2008), ‘Sonoristics, sonorism’, Grove Music Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.2061689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, M. J. (2001), Serial Music, Serial Aesthetics: Compositional Theory in Post-War Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gredinger, P. (1958), ‘Serial Technique’, Die Reihe, 1, 38–44.Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. (1978), Boulez, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. (1995), Modern Music and After: Directions Since 1945, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. (2003), The Sea on Fire: Jean Barraqué, Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar

Gromov, E. (2018), Kyiv Daily [Facebook post], 29 December, www.facebook.com/kyivdaily/posts/482720412134639/. Accessed 31 August 2022.Google Scholar

Gruber, G. (1998), ‘Stockhausen’s Konzeptionen der “Weltmusik”’, in Misch, I. and von Blumröder, C. (eds.), Internationales Stockhausen-Symposion 1998, Musikwissenschaftliches Institut der Universität zu Köln, 11. bis 14. November 1998: Tagungsbericht, Saarbrücken: Pfau, 103–11.Google Scholar

Guarnieri, C. (2000), ‘Carta aberta aos músicos e críticos do Brasil’, in Kater, C., Música Viva e H.J. Koellreutter: movimentos em direção à modernidade, São Paulo: Musa Editora, 119–24.Google Scholar

Guerrero, J. M. (2009), ‘The Presence of Hindemith in Nono’s Sketches: A New Context for Nono’s Music’, The Journal of Musicology, 26:4, 481–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, G. F. (1990), ‘Disziplin oder Indisziplin? Anmerkungen zu der von Ulrich Mosch veröffentlichen Reihentabelle van Pierre Boulez’, Musiktheorie, 5:3, 271–3.Google Scholar

Haefeli, A. (1982), Die internationale Gesellschaft für Neue Musik, Zurich: Atlantis.Google Scholar

Hailey, C. (2010), Alban Berg and His World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Haimo, E. (1990), Schoenberg’s Serial Odyssey: The Evolution of His Twelve-Tone Method, 1914–1928, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Haimo, E. (2002), ‘Tonal Analogies in Arnold Schoenberg’s Fourth Quartet’, Journal of the Arnold Schönberg Center, 4, 219–28.Google Scholar

Hall, P. (1997), A View of Berg’s ‘Lulu’ through the Autograph Sources, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hamao, F. (2011), ‘Redating Schoenberg’s Announcement of the Twelve-Tone Method: A Study of Recollections’, GAMUT: Online Journal of the Music Theory Society of the Mid-Atlantic, 4:1. https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=gamut.Google Scholar

Hayashi, T. (2017), ‘The Primer: Yellow Magic Orchestra’, The Wire, 404, 38–45.Google Scholar

Headlam, D. (1996), The Music of Alban Berg, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1975), Hegel’s Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, ii, ed. and trans. Sir Thomas Malcolm Knox, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heike, G. (1999), ‘Die Bedeutung der Phonetik in der Vokalkomposition von Stockhausen’, in Misch, I. and von Blumröder, C. (eds.), Internationales Stockhausen-Symposion 1998, Musikwissenschaftliches Institut der Universität zu Köln, 11. bis 14. November 1998: Tagungsbericht, Saarbrücken: Pfau, 206–16.Google Scholar

Heile, B. (2006), The Music of Mauricio Kagel, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Heile, B. (2009), ‘Weltmusik and the Globalization of New Music’, in Heile, B. (ed.), The Modernist Legacy: Essays on New Music, Aldershot: Ashgate, 101–21.Google Scholar

Henahan, D. (1980), ‘Philharmonic: Zagortsev’, New York Times, 18 January, C20.Google Scholar

Henrich, H. (1997), Das Werk Jean Barraqués: Genese und Faktur, Kassel: Bärenreiter.Google Scholar

Herd, J. A. (1989), ‘The Neonationalist Movement: Origins of Japanese Contemporary Music’, Perspectives of New Music, 27:2, 118–63.Google Scholar

Herrera, E. (2020), Elite Art Worlds: Philanthropy, Latin Americanism, and Avant-Garde Music, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hicks, M. (1990) ‘John Cage’s Studies with Schoenberg’, American Music, 8:2, 125–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, P. (2007), ‘Messiaen Recorded: The Quatres Études de rythme’, in Dingle, C. and Simeone, N. (eds.), Olivier Messiaen: Music, Art and Literature, Abingdon: Taylor and Francis, 79–90.Google Scholar

Hinton, S. (1993), ‘Germany, 1918–45’, in Morgan, R. P. (ed.), Modern Times: From World War I to the Present, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 83–110.Google Scholar

Hodges, N. (1993), ‘The Music of Bill Hopkins: A Preliminary Approach’, Tempo, 186, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodin, J. P. (1966), Oskar Kokoschka: The Artist and His Time, London: Cory, Adams, and Mackay.Google Scholar

Hogan, C. (1982), ‘“Threni”: Stravinsky’s “Debt” to Krenek’, Tempo, 141, 22–5, 28–9.Google Scholar

Holmes, T. (2016), Electronic and Experimental Music: Technology, Music, and Culture, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Holtsträter, K. (2010), Mauricio Kagels musikalisches Werk, Cologne: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Homma, M. (2001), ‘Lutosławski’s Studies in Twelve-Tone Rows’, in Skowron, Z. (ed.), Lutosławski Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 194–210.Google Scholar

Hommes, M.-T. (2010), Verkettungen und Querstände: Weberns Schüler Karl Amadeus Hartmann und Ludwig Zenk und die politischen Implikationen ihres kompositorischen Handelns vor und nach 1945, Schliengen: Edition Argus.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. (1972), Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. J. Cumming, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Hosokawa, T. (1995), ‘Aus der Tiefe der Erde: Musik und Natur’, MusikTexte, 60, 49–54.Google Scholar

Howard, K. (2006), Perspectives on Korean Music: Tradition, Innovation and the Discourse of Identity, ii, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Hubbs, N. (2004), The Queer Composition of America’s Sound: Gay Modernists, American Music, and National Identity, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hume, P. (1954), ‘Stravinsky Septet Has Premiere’, Washington Post, 25 January.Google Scholar

Hüneke, A. (2000), ‘Oskar Kokoschkas Graphiken zur Bachkantate O Ewigkeit, du Donnerwort im Kontext’, in Heinemann, M. and Hinrichsen, H.-J. (eds.), Bach und die Nachwelt, vol 3: 1900–1950, Laaber: Laaber, 381–95.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1964), The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, ed. Heidegger, M., trans. J. S. Churchill, The Hague: Martinus Nijoff.Google Scholar

Hyde, M. (1982), Schoenberg’s Twelve-Tone Harmony: The Suite Op. 29 and the Compositional Sketches, Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.Google Scholar

Hyde, M (1983), ‘The Format and Function of Schoenberg’s Twelve-Tone Sketches’, Journal of the American Musicological Society, 36:3, 453–80.Google Scholar

Hyde, M (1985), ‘Musical Form and the Development of Schoenberg’s “Twelve-Tone Method”’, Journal of Music Theory, 29:1, 85–143.Google Scholar

Ibáñez-Richter, C. (2014), Mauricio Kagels Buenos Aires (1946–1957): Kulturpolitik—Künstlernetzwerk—Kompositionen, Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar

Iddon, M. (2013), New Music at Darmstadt: Nono, Stockhausen, Cage, and Boulez, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Imbrie, A. (1971), ‘Roger Sessions: In Honor of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday’, in Boretz, B. and Cone, E. T. (eds.), Perspectives on American Composers, New York: WW Norton, 59–89.Google Scholar

Iverson, J. (2014a), ‘Ligeti’s Dodecaphonic Requiem’, Tempo, 68, 31–47.Google Scholar

Iverson, J. (2014b), ‘Statistical Form amongst the Darmstadt School’, Music Analysis, 33:3, 341–87.Google Scholar

Iverson, J. (2016), ‘From Analog to Digital: An Interview with Gottfried Michael Koenig’, Tempo, 70:276, 43–55.Google Scholar

Iverson, J. (2017a), ‘Invisible Collaboration: The Dawn and Evolution of elektronische Musik’, Music Theory Spectrum, 39:2, 1–23.Google Scholar

Iverson, J. (2017b), ‘Learning the Studio: Sketches for Mid-Century Electronic Music’, Contemporary Music Review, 36:5, 362–87.Google Scholar

Iverson, J. (2019), Electronic Inspirations: Technologies of the Cold War Musical Avant-Garde, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iverson, J. (2020), ‘Fraught Adjacencies: The Politics of German Electronic Music’, Acta Musicologica, 92:1, 93–111.Google Scholar

Jakelski, L. (2017), Making New Music in Cold War Poland: The Warsaw Autumn Festival, 1956–1978, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Janik, A. (2001), Wittgenstein’s Vienna Revisited, New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar

Janik, E. (2005), Recomposing German Music: Politics and Musical Tradition in Cold War Berlin, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Janz, T. (2019), ‘Multiple Musical Modernities?’, in Janz, T. and Yang, C. (eds.), Decentering Musical Modernity: Perspectives on East Asian and European Music History, Bielefeld: transcript, 279–312.Google Scholar

Jarman, D. (1997), ‘Secret Programmes’, in Pople, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berg, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 167–79.Google Scholar

Jarman, D. (2017), ‘“Frisch, Fromm, Fröhlich, Frei”: The Deutscher Turnerbund and the Berg Violin Concerto’, Musicologica Autriaca: Journal for Austrian Music Studies, 17 February, www.musau.org/parts/neue-article-page/view/34.Google Scholar

Jay, M. (1996), The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Jencks, C. (1987), Post-Modernism: The New Classicism in Art and Architecture, London: Academy.Google Scholar

Johnson, J. (1998), ‘The Nature of Abstraction: Analysis and the Webern Myth’, Music Analysis, 17:3, 267–80.Google Scholar

Johnson, J. (1999), Webern and the Transformation of Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. S. (1975), Messiaen, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. M. (1984), ‘Time Point Sets and Meter’, Perspectives of New Music, 23:1, 278–97.Google Scholar

Jone, H. (1959), ‘A Cantata’, Die Reihe, 2, 7–8.Google Scholar

Ju, Q. (2017), ‘Musical Thought of Soviet Union and the History of Chinese Contemporary Music’, Chinese Musicology, 3, 42–51.Google Scholar

Julien, O. and Levaux, C. (2018), Over and Over: Exploring Repetition in Popular Music, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Kafka, F. (2017), ‘The Burrow’, in The Burrow: Posthumously Published Short Fiction, trans. M. Hofmann, London: Penguin Random House, 183–220.Google Scholar

Kahn, D. (2012), ‘James Tenney at Bell Labs’, in Higgins, H. B. and Kahn, D. (eds.), Mainframe Experimentalism: Early Computing and the Foundations of the Digital Arts, Berkeley: University of California Press, 131–46.Google Scholar

Kaiser, E. (2013), Rosegger-Rezeption bei Anton Webern, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Kaizen, W. (2012), ‘Computer Participator: Nam June Paik’s Work in Computing’, in Higgins, H. B. and Kahn, D. (eds.), Mainframe Experimentalism: Early Computing and the Foundations of the Digital Arts, Berkeley: University of California Press, 229–39.Google Scholar

Kang, S. (1992), ‘Contemporary Music Skyrocketing in Vigor’, Koreana, 6:1, 9–16.Google Scholar

Kapp, R. (1988), ‘Shades of the Double’s Original: René Leibowitz’s Dispute with Boulez’, Tempo, 165, 2–16.Google Scholar

Karnes, K. C. (2021), Sounds Beyond: Arvo Pärt and the 1970s Soviet Underground, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kassel, M. (2004), ‘Das Fundament in Turm zu Babel: Ein weiterer Versuch, Anagrama zu lesen’, in Tadday, U. (ed.), Mauricio Kagel, Munich: text + kritik, 5–26.Google Scholar

Kassler, M. (1967), ‘Toward a Theory That Is the Twelve-Note-Class System’, Perspectives of New Music, 5:2, 1–80.Google Scholar

Katayama, M. (2007), ‘About this recording’, Japanese Composer Series: Sugata’s Music, Naxos 8.570319.Google Scholar

Katz, M. (2012), Groove Music: The Art and Culture of the Hip Hop DJ, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kautny, O. (2002), Arvo Pärt zwischen Ost und West: Rezeptionsgeschichte, Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar

Keillor, E. (1994), John Weinzweig and His Music: The Radical Romantic of Canada, Metuchen: Scarecrow.Google Scholar

Keillor, E. (2006), Music in Canada: Capturing Landscape and Diversity, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Keller, H. (1973), ‘Schoenberg and the Crisis of Communication’, in Atherton, D. (ed.), The London Sinfonietta Schoenberg/Gerhard Series, London: Sinfonietta Productions Limited, 44–8.Google Scholar

Kholopov, Y. N. (1983), ‘Kto izobrel 12-tonovoi tekhniku?’, in Problemy istorii avstro-nemetskoi muzyki. Pervaia tret’ XX veka, Moscow: Instituta im. Gnesinykh, 34–58.Google Scholar

Kholopov, Y. N. (1999), ‘Tekhniki kompozitsii Nikolaia Roslavtsa i Nikolaia Obukhova v ikh otnoshenii k razvitiiu 12-tonovoi muzyki’, in Muzyka XX veka. Moskovskii forum. Materialy mezhdunarodnykh nauchnykh konferentsii, Moscow: МGК, xxv, 75–93.Google Scholar

Khrushchev, N. (2001), ‘Declaration Made by Nikita Khrushchev on 8 March 1963 Stating His Views on Music in Soviet Society’, in Kuhn, L. and Slonimsky, N. (eds.), Music since 1900, New York: Schirmer, 953–4.Google Scholar

Killick, A. P. (1992), ‘Musical Composition in Twentieth-Century Korea’, Korean Studies, 16, 43–60.Google Scholar

Kim, M. S. (1990), ‘A Musical and Pedagogical Analysis of Selected Piano Works of Byung Dong Paik’, PhD dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Kim, S. (2012), ‘Isang Yun and the Hauptton Technique: An Analytical Study of the Second Movement from Duo für Violoncello und Harfe (1984)’, DMA thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar

Klumpenhouwer, H. J. (1991), ‘A Generalized Model of Voice-Leading for Atonal Music’, PhD diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar

Koblyakov, L. (1990), Pierre Boulez: A World of Harmony, New York: Harwood.Google Scholar

Koenig, G. M. (1991–2002), Ästhetische Praxis: Texte zur Musik, 5 vols., Saarbrücken: Pfau.Google Scholar

Koenig, G. M. (2018), ‘Bilthoven Course 1961/62’, in Tazelaar, K. (ed.), Process and Form: Selected Writings on Music, trans. R. Barrett, Hofheim: Wolke, 138–92.Google Scholar

Koenig, G. M. (n.d.), Koenig Project, http://koenigproject.nl/. Accessed 23 July 2020.Google Scholar

Koffler, J. (1934), ‘Drei Begegnungen’, Arnold Schönberg zum 60. Geburtstag, Vienna: Universal, 36–8.Google Scholar

Kohl, J. (1990), ‘Into the Middleground: Formula Syntax in Stockhausen’s Licht’, Perspectives of New Music, 28:2, 262–91.Google Scholar

Kohl, J. (2017), Karlheinz Stockhausen: Zeitmaße, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kokoschka, O. (1984), O Ewigkeit, du Donnerwort: 11 Lithographien zur Kantate von Johann Sebastian Bach, Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar

Korte, O. (2012), ‘Il y a un temps pour tout: la phase sérielle de Zimmermann’, in Michel, P., Henrich, H., and Albèra, P. (eds.), Regards croisés sur Bernd Alois Zimmermann, Geneva: Contrechamps, 69–86.Google Scholar

Kovács, I. (1997a), ‘Die Ferienkurse als Schauplatz der Ost-West-Konfrontation’, in Borio, G. and Danuser, H. (eds.), Im Zenit der Moderne: Die Internationale Ferienkurse für Neue Musik Darmstadt 1946–1966, Freiburg: Rombach, i, 116–39.Google Scholar

Kovács, I. (1997b), ‘Gründung und Zielsetzung’, in Borio, G. and Danuser, H. (eds.), Im Zenit der Moderne: Die Internationale Ferienkurse für Neue Musik Darmstadt 1946–1966, Freiburg: Rombach, i, 65–75.Google Scholar

Kovács, I. (1997c), ‘Neue Musik abseits der Avantgarde? Zwei Fallbeispiele’, in Borio, G. and Danuser, H. (eds.), Im Zenit der Moderne: Die Internationale Ferienkurse für Neue Musik Darmstadt 1946–1966, Freiburg: Rombach, ii, 13–61.Google Scholar

Krenek, E. (1940), Studies in Counterpoint: Based on the Twelve-Tone Technique, New York: G. Schirmer.Google Scholar

Krenek, E. (1943), ‘New Developments in the Twelve-Tone Technique’, Music Review, 4, 81–97.Google Scholar

Krenek, E. (1960), ‘Extent and Limits of Serial Techniques’, The Musical Quarterly, 46, 210–32.Google Scholar

Krenek, E. (1971), ‘A Composer’s Influences’, in Boretz, B. and Cone, E. T. (eds.), Perspectives on American Composers, New York: WW Norton, 125–30.Google Scholar

Krenek, E. (1974), ‘Serialism’, in Vinton, J. (ed.), Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Music, London: Thames and Hudson, 670–4.Google Scholar

Kroiter, R. and Koenig, W. (dirs.) (1959), Glenn Gould: Off the Road, National Film Board of Canada.Google Scholar

Krones, H. (ed.) (1999), Anton Webern: Persönlichkeit zwischen Kunst und Politik, Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Kroó, G. (1982), ‘New Hungarian Music’, Notes, 39:1, 43–71.Google Scholar

Krukowski, D. (2017), The New Analog: Listening and Reconnecting in a Digital World, New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

Kudinš, J. (2018), ‘Latvian Music History in the Context of the 20th-Century Modernism and Postmodernism: Some Specific Issues of Local Historiography’, Musicological Annual, 54:2, 97–139.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1996), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kujumdzhiev, J. (2017), ‘Zur Rezeption der Wiener Schule in Bulgarien’, in Loos, H. (ed.), Musikgeschichte in Mittel- und Osteuropa, 20 vols., Leipzig: Gudrun Schröder, xix, 277–90.Google Scholar

Kurbatskaia, S. (1996), Seriinaia muzyka: voprosy istorii, teorii, estetiki, Moscow: Sfera.Google Scholar

Kurth, R. (1992), ‘Mosaic Polyphony: Formal Balance, Imbalance and Phrase Formation in the Prelude of Schoenberg’s Suite, Op. 25’, Music Theory Spectrum, 14:2, 188–208.Google Scholar

Kurth, R. (1996), ‘Disregarding Schoenberg’s Twelve-Tone Rows: An Alternative Approach to Listening and Analysis for Twelve-Tone Music’, Theory and Practice, 21, 79–122.Google Scholar

Kurtz, M. (1992), Stockhausen: A Biography, trans. R. Toop, London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Kuss, M. (2013), ‘Ginastera (1916–1983): La Trayectoria de un Método’, Revista Argentina de Musicología, 14, 15–52.Google Scholar

Kutsch, K.-J. and Riemens, L. (2012), Großes Sängerlexikon, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Lachenmann, H. (1970), ‘Klangtypen der neuen Musik’, Zeitschrift für Musiktheorie, 1, 20–30.Google Scholar

Lachenmann, H. ([1970] 1996), ‘Werkstatt-Gespräch’, in Häusler, J. (ed.), Musik als existentielle Erfahrung: Schriften, 1966–1995, Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel, 145–52.Google Scholar

Lake, W. E. (1986), ‘The Architecture of a Superarray Composition: Milton Babbitt’s String Quartet No. 5’, Perspectives of New Music, 24:2, 88–111.Google Scholar

Laufer, M. (2015), ‘Reinscribing Modernism: Selected Episodes in Venezuelan Composition after 1950’, PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. (2003), Love Saves the Day: A History of American Dance Music Culture 1970–1979, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, J. M. (2017), ‘National Identity Formation and Musical Modernism in Post-World War II Korea’, PhD dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar

Leibowitz, R. (1947), Schoenberg et son école: l’étape contemporaine du langage musical, Paris: J. B. Janin.Google Scholar

Leibowitz, R. (1949a), Introduction à la musique de douze sons, Paris: L’Arche.Google Scholar

Leibowitz, R. (1949b), Schoenberg and His School: The Contemporary Stage of the Language of Music, trans. D. Newlin, New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar

Leleu, J.-L. and Decroupet, P. (2011), ‘La Sonate pour deux pianos de Michel Fano: technique sérielle et phrase musicale’, in Delaere, M. (ed.), Rewriting Recent Music History: The Development of Early Serialism, 1947–1957, Leuven: Peeters, 101–37.Google Scholar

Lester, J. (1968), ‘Pitch Structure Articulation in the Variations of Schoenberg’s Serenade’, Perspectives of New Music, 6:2, 22–34.Google Scholar

Lewin, D. (1968), ‘Inversional Balance as an Organizing Force in Schoenberg’s Music and Thought’, Perspectives of New Music, 6:2, 1–21.Google Scholar

Lewin, D. (1976), ‘On Partial Ordering’, Perspectives of New Music, 14:2–15:1, 252–9.Google Scholar

Lewin, D. (1982), ‘Transformational Techniques in Atonal and Other Music Theories’, Perspectives of New Music, 21, 312–71.Google Scholar

Lewin, D. (1987), Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lewin, D. (1990), ‘Klumpenhouwer Networks and Some Isographies That Involve Them’, Music Theory Spectrum, 12:1, 83–120.Google Scholar

Lewin, D. (1993), Musical Form and Transformation: Four Analytic Essays, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lewin, D. (1995), ‘Generalized Interval Systems for Babbit’s Lists, and for Schoenberg’s String Trio’, Music Theory Spectrum, 17:1, 81–118.Google Scholar

Lewinski, W. E. von (1960), ‘Young Composers’, Die Reihe, 4, 1–4.Google Scholar

Li, Y. (2013), ‘Some Issues in the Scholarship of Music History of the Republic of China’, Journal of Xinghai Conservatory of Music, 133:4, 1–16.Google Scholar

Ligeti, G. (1958), ‘Pierre Boulez: Entscheidung und Automatik in der Structure Ia’, Die Reihe, 4, 38–63.Google Scholar

Ligeti, G. ([1958] 1960a), ‘Pierre Boulez: Decision and Automatism in Structures Ia’, trans. L. Black, Die Reihe, 4, 36–62.Google Scholar

Ligeti, G. (1960b), ‘Wandlungen der musikalischen Form’, Die Reihe, 7, 5–17.Google Scholar

Ligeti, G. ([1958–9] 1965), ‘Metamorphoses of Musical Form’, trans. C. Cardew, Die Reihe, 7, 5–19.Google Scholar

Ligeti, G. (1983), Ligeti in Conversation, trans. G. J. Schabert, S. E. Soulsby, T. Kilmartin, and G. Skelton, London: Eulenberg.Google Scholar

Ligeti, G. (1984), ‘Aspekte der Webernschen Kompositionstechnik’, in Metzger, H.-K. and Riehn, R. (eds.), Anton Webern II, Munich: text + kritik, 51–104.Google Scholar

Ligeti, G. (2007a), ‘Form in der Neuen Musik’, in Lichtenfeld, M. (ed.), Gesammelte Schriften, Mainz: Schott, i, 185–99.Google Scholar

Ligeti, G. (2007b), ‘Kompositorische Tendenzen heute’, in Lichtenfeld, M. (ed.), Gesammelte Schriften, Mainz: Schott, i, 112–16.Google Scholar

Ligeti, G. (2007c), ‘Wandlungen der musikalischen Form’, in Lichtenfeld, M. (ed.), Gesammelte Schriften, Mainz: Schott, i, 85–104.Google Scholar

Ligeti, G. (2007d), ‘Webern und die Tradition’, in Lichtenfeld, M. (ed.), Gesammelte Schriften, Mainz: Schott, i, 379–82.Google Scholar

Lindstedt, I. (2013), ‘Sonoristics and Serial Thinking: On the Distinctive Features of Works from the “Polish School”’, in Mantzourani, E. (ed.), Polish Music since 1945, Kraków: Musica Iagellonica, 300–10.Google Scholar

Lindstedt, I. (2018), ‘The Polish School of Composition in 20th-Century Music: A Recapitulation’, Musicology Today, 151:7, 32–40.Google Scholar

Link, J. (2022), Elliot Carter’s Late Music, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lo, K. Y. (2015), ‘Functions of Silence in the Twelve-Tone Music of Anton Webern’, MA dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar

Locanto, M. (2009), ‘“Composing with Intervals”: Intervallic Syntax and Serial Technique in Late Stravinsky’, trans. C. Jenkins, Music Analysis, 28, 221–66.Google Scholar

Lorenz, R. (n.d.), ‘Latin American Nationalism Deconstructed’, in R. Lorenz, Voices in Limbo: Identity, Representation, and Realities of Latin American Composers, http://ricardolorenz.com/research/realities-inside-the-limbo/. Accessed 13 April 2020.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2006), ‘Simplifying Complex Multiplication’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Music Theory, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2008), ‘Isography and Structure in the Music of Pierre Boulez’, Journal of Mathematics and Music, 2:3, 135–55.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2014), ‘Complex Multiplication, Structure and Process: Harmony and Form in Boulez’s Structures II’, Music Theory Spectrum, 36:1, 86–120.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2016), ‘Middleground Structure in the Cadenza to Boulez’s Éclat’, Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Society for Music Theory and the American Musicological Society, Vancouver.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2017), ‘Between Freedom and Control: Composing Out, Compositional Process, and Structure in the Music of Boulez’, Journal of Music Theory, 61:2, 201–42.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2018), ‘The “Prismes” of Figures Doubles Prismes’, Mitteilungen der Paul Sacher Stiftung, 3, 44–48.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2019a), ‘Boulez and Mathematics’, in Illiano, R. (ed.), Twentieth-Century Music and Mathematics, Turnhout: Brepols, 91–109.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2019b), ‘The Diagonal Dimension: Concepts of Harmony in the Music of Pierre Boulez’, Paper presented at the symposium New Concepts of Harmony in Musical Composition 1945–1975, Istituto per la Musica Fondazione Giorgio Cini, Venice.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2019c), ‘Middleground Structure in the Cadenza to Boulez’s Éclat’, Music Theory Online, 25:1, https://mtosmt.org/issues/mto.19.25.1/mto.19.25.1.losada.html.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2019d), ‘“Nécessité d’une orientation esthétique”: Techniques of Development in the Music of Boulez’, Music Theory and Analysis, 6:1, 87–128.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2021a), ‘Rotational Arrays in the Music of Boulez’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Music Theory.Google Scholar

Losada, C. C. (2021b), ‘Pierre Boulez, América Latina y la vanguardia europea después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial’, Musica Theorica, 6:1: 1–40.Google Scholar

Lück, R. (ed.) (1968), Neue Sowjetische Klaviermusik. Cologne: Gerig.Google Scholar

Lunina, A. (2013), Kompozitor—malen’kaia planeta: besedy, Kyiv: Dukh i litera.Google Scholar

Luo, Q. (2016), ‘Shanghai “Enclave”: “Community of Music” and its Political and Cultural Space (ii)’, The Art of Music: Journal of the Shanghai Conservatory of Music, 2, 44–61.Google Scholar

Lynn, D. L. (1992), ‘Genesis, Process, and Reception of Anton Webern’s Twelve-Tone Music: A Study of the Sketches for Opp. 17–19, 21, and 22/2 (1924–1930)’, PhD dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar

Maconie, R. (1976), The Works of Karlheinz Stockhausen, London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar

Maconie, R. (2011), ‘Care to Listen: Milton Babbitt and Information Science in the 1950s’, Tempo, 65:258, 20–36.Google Scholar

Maderna, B. (1965), ‘La revolution dans la continuité’, Preuves, 177, 28–9.Google Scholar

Madrid, A. L. (2008), Sounds of the Modern Nation: Music, Culture, and Ideas in Post-Revolutionary Mexico, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Maggart, A. (2020), ‘Some Surface Level “Spurious Associations” between Milton Babbitt’s Whirled Series and Baseball’, Perspectives of New Music, 58:2, 157–214.Google Scholar

Mailman, J. B. (2019), ‘Babbitt’s Beguiling Surfaces, Improvised Inside’, SMT V: Society for Music Theory Videocast Journal, 5. http://doi.org/10.30535/smtv.5.1.Google Scholar

Malvezzi, P. and Pirelli, G. (eds.) (1954), Lettere di condannati a morte della resistenza europea, Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Manning, P. (2013), Electronic and Computer Music, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Marion, M. (2005), ‘Louis Rougier, the Vienna Circle and the Unity of Science’, in Nemeth, E. and Roudet, N. (eds.), Paris–Wien: Enzyklopädieprojekte im Vergleich, Vienna: Springer, 151–77.Google Scholar

Masnikosa, M. (2009), ‘The Life and Work of Ljubica Marić: “Mulifariousness of One”’, New Sound, 33, 12–35.Google Scholar

Mason, C. (1961), ‘Stravinsky’s New Work’, Tempo, 59, 5–14.Google Scholar

Mason, C. (1962), ‘Serial Procedures in the Ricercar II of Stravinsky’s “Cantata”’, Tempo, 61/2, 6–9.Google Scholar

Mathon, G., Feneyrou, L., and Ferrari, G. (eds.) (2007), À Bruno Maderna, Paris: Basalte.Google Scholar

Matsudaira, Y. A. and Benítez, J. M. (1998), ‘Matsudaira Yoritsune’s Path from Neoclassical to Aleatory Music’, Contemporary Music Review, 17:4, 5–13.Google Scholar

May, C. J. (2016), ‘System, Gesture, Rhetoric: Contexts for Rethinking Tintinnabuli in the Music of Arvo Pärt, 1960–1990’, PhD thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

May, C. J. (2021), ‘Colorful Dreams: Exploring Pärt’s Soviet Film Music’, in Bouteneff, P. C., Engelhardt, J., and Saler, R. (eds.), Arvo Pärt: Sounding the Sacred, New York: Fordham University Press, 36–67.Google Scholar

Mead, A. (1983), ‘Detail and the Array in Milton Babbitt’s My Compliments to Roger’, Music Theory Spectrum, 5, 89–109.Google Scholar

Mead, A. (1987), ‘About About Time’s Time: A Survey of Milton Babbitt’s Recent Rhythmic Practice’, Perspectives of New Music, 25:1–2, 182–235.Google Scholar

Mead, A. (1994), An Introduction to the Music of Milton Babbitt, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mead, A. (1997), ‘Still Being an American Composer: Milton Babbitt at Eighty’, Perspectives of New Music, 35:2, 101–26.Google Scholar

Mead, A. (2009), ‘The String Quartets of Milton Babbitt’, in Jones, E. (ed.), Intimate Voices: Aspects of Construction and Character in the Twentieth-Century String Quartet, Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 210–37.Google Scholar

Mead, A. (2011), ‘Parallel Processes: Milton Babbitt and “Total Serialism”’, in Delaere, M. (ed.), Rewriting Recent Music History: The Development of Early Serialism, 1947–1957, Leuven: Peeters, 9–26.Google Scholar

Medić, I. (2007), ‘The Ideology of Moderated Modernism in Serbian Music and Musicology’, Musicology, 7, 279–94.Google Scholar

Medić, I. (2019), ‘The Impossible Avant-Garde of Vladan Radovanović’, Musicological Annual, 55:1, 157–76.Google Scholar

Messiaen, O. (1994), Technique de mon langage musicale, Paris: Alphonse LeducGoogle Scholar

Messiaen, O. ([1949–92] 1994–2004), Traité de rythme, de couleur et d’ornithologie, 7 vols., Paris: Alphonse Leduc.Google Scholar

Metzger, H.-K. (1961), ‘Abortive Concepts in the Theory and Criticism of Music’, trans. L. Black, Die Reihe, 5, 21–9.Google Scholar

Meyer, L. B. (1967), Music, The Arts, and Ideas: Patterns and Predictions in Twentieth-Century Culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Michel, P. (2011), ‘Quelques aspects de la forme chez Gilbert Amy dans les années 1960 et 1970’, Il Saggiatore Musicale, 18:1–2, 109–37.Google Scholar

Middleton, R. (1983), ‘“Play it Again Sam”: Some Notes on the Productivity of Repetition in Popular Music’, Popular Music, 3, 235–70.Google Scholar

Mikawa, M. (2014), ‘Permutational Thought: Mauricio Kagel’s Antithese (1962)’, Perspectives of New Music, 52:3, 197–222.Google Scholar

Mila, M. and Nono, L. (2010), Nulla di oscuro tra noi. Lettere 1952–1988, ed. De Benedictis, A. I. and Rizzardi, V., Milan: il Saggiatore.Google Scholar

Milin, M. (2009), ‘Serbian Music of the Second Half of the 20th Century: From Socialist Realism to Postmodernism’, in Romanou, K. (ed.), Serbian and Greek Art Music: A Patch to Western Music History, Bristol: Intellect, 81–96.Google Scholar

Milin, M. (2015), ‘Cultural Isolation of Yugoslavia 1944–1960 and Its Impact on the Sphere of Music: The Case of Serbia’, Musicological Annual, 51:2, 149–61.Google Scholar

Milin, M. (2017), ‘Zur Rezeption der Ideen und der Tätigkeit der Wiener Schule in Serbien’, in Loos, H. (ed.), Musikgeschichte in Mittel- und Osteuropa, 20 vols., Leipzig: Gudrun Schröder, xix, 291–305.Google Scholar

Miller, D. H. (2020), ‘Modernist Music for Children: Three Sketches of Anton Webern in the Midcentury United States’, Journal of Musicology, 37:4, 488–517.Google Scholar

Mills, M. (2011), ‘On Disability Cybernetics: Helen Keller, Norbert Wiener, and the Hearing Glove’, differences, 22:2–3, 74–111.Google Scholar

Mills, M. (2012), ‘Media and Prosthesis: The Vocoder, the Artificial Larynx, and the History of Signal Processing’, Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 21:2, 107–49.Google Scholar

Mirka, D. (2001), ‘To Cut the Gordian Knot: The Timbre System of Krzysztof Penderecki’, Journal of Music Theory, 45:2, 435–56.Google Scholar

Misch, I. (1998), ‘On the Serial Shaping of Stockhausen’s Gruppen für drei Orchester’, trans. F. Hentschel and J. Kohl, Perspectives of New Music, 36:1, 143–87.Google Scholar

Misch, I. (1999a), ‘“Wir können noch eine Dimension tiefer gehen … ”: Zur Gestaltung des Raumes in der elektroakustischen Musik Karlheinz Stockhausens’, in Misch, I. and von Blumröder, C. (eds.), Internationales Stockhausen-Symposion 1998, Musikwissenschaftliches Institut der Universität zu Köln, 11. bis 14. November 1998: Tagungsbericht, Saarbrücken: Pfau, 147–55.Google Scholar

Misch, I. (1999b), Zur Kompositionstechnik Karlheinz Stockhausens Gruppen für 3 Orchester (1955–57), Saarbrücken: Pfau.Google Scholar

Misch, I. and Bandur, M. (eds.) (2001), Karlheinz Stockhausen bei den Internationalen Ferienkursen für Neue Musik in Darmstadt 1951–1996: Dokumente und Briefe, Kürten: Stockhausen-Stiftung für Musik.Google Scholar

Misch, I. and Delaere, M. (eds.) (2017), Karel Goeyvaerts–Karlheinz Stockhausen: Briefwechsel / Correspondence 1951–1958, Kürten: Stockhausen-Stiftung für Musik.Google Scholar

Moldenhauer, H. [and R.] (1978), Anton von Webern: A Chronicle of his Life and Work, London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar

Moog-Grünewald, M. (1993), ‘Investigación de las Influencias y de la Recepción’, in Rall, D. (ed.), En busca del texto: teoría de la recepción literaria, Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 245–70.Google Scholar

Moore, A. F. (1995), ‘Serialism and Its Contradictions’, International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, 26:1, 77–95.Google Scholar

Móricz, K. (2008), Jewish Identities. Nationalism, Racism, and Utopianism in Twentieth-Century Music, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Morris, R. (1987), Composition with Pitch-Classes: A Theory of Compositional Design, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Morris, R. (1997), ‘Listening to Milton Babbitt’s Electronic Music: The Medium and the Message’, Perspectives of New Music, 35:2, 85–99.Google Scholar

Morris, R. and Alegant, B. (1988), ‘The Even Partitions in Twelve-Tone Music’, Music Theory Spectrum, 10, 74–101.Google Scholar

Morris, R. and Starr, D. (1974), ‘The Structure of All-Interval Series’, Journal of Music Theory, 18:2, 364–89.Google Scholar

Morris, R. and Starr, D. (1977), ‘A General Theory of Combinatoriality and the Aggregate (Parts i and ii)’, Perspectives of New Music, 16:1, 3–35 and 16:2, 50–84.Google Scholar

Morton, L. (1952), ‘In Praise of Stravinsky’s New Work’, Frontier Music, November 1952, 21.Google Scholar

Mosch, U. (1990), ‘Disziplin und Indisziplin: Zum seriellen Komponieren im 2. Satz des Marteau sans maître von Pierre Boulez’, Musiktheorie, 5:1, 39–66.Google Scholar

Mosch, U. (1997), ‘Wahrnehmungsweisen serieller Musik’, Musiktheorie, 12:1, 61–70.Google Scholar

Moseley, R. (2016), Keys to Play: Music as a Ludic Medium from Apollo to Nintendo, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Murail, T. (2005), ‘Scelsi and L’Itinéraire: The Exploration of Sound’, Contemporary Music Review, 24:2–3, 181–5.Google Scholar

Nattiez, J.-J. (ed.) (1993), The Boulez–Cage Correspondence, trans. R. Samuels, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nattiez, J.-J. (2002), Pierre Boulez–John Cage: correspondance et documents, rev. R. Piencikowski, Mainz: Schott.Google Scholar

Nauck, Gisela (1997), Musik im Raum–Raum in der Musik: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der seriellen Musik, Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar

Neidhöfer, C. (2007), ‘Maderna’s Serial Arrays’, Music Theory Online, 13:1. https://mtosmt.org/issues/mto.07.13.1/mto.07.13.1.neidhofer.html.Google Scholar

Neidhöfer, C. (2009), ‘Inside Luciano Berio’s Serialism’, Music Analysis, 28:2–3, 301–48.Google Scholar

Neidhöfer, C. (2012), ‘Berio at Work: Compositional Procedures in Circles, O King, Concerto for Two Pianos, Glossa, and Notturno’, in De Benedictis, A. I. (ed.), Luciano Berio: Nuove prospettive / New Perspectives, Florence: Olschki, 195–233.Google Scholar

Nelson, A. (2015), The Sound of Innovation: Stanford and the Computer Music Revolution, Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Nicolas, F. (2005), ‘De l’intellectualité de Boulez (1): Ses références à la pensée scientifique’, www.entretemps.asso.fr/Nicolas/IM/. Accessed 1 May 2018.Google Scholar

Nicolas, F. (2010), ‘L’intellectualité musicale de Pierre Boulez et ses enjeux théoriques’, in Goldman, J., Nattiez, J.-J., and Nicolas, F. (eds.), La pensée de Pierre Boulez à travers ses écrits: actes du colloque tenu à l’École Normale Supérieure les 4 et 5 mars 2005 à l’occasion du quatre-vingtième anniversaire de Pierre Boulez, Paris: Delatour, 17–62.Google Scholar