Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:38:47.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Social and Moral Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2024

Edited by
Beth Singler  and
Fraser Watts
Beth Singler
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Fraser Watts
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Religion and Artificial Intelligence , pp. 129 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Bergson, Henri. 2009. Creative Evolution, trans. Arthur Mitchell. The Floating PressGoogle Scholar
Bostrom, Nick. 2005. “A History of Transhumanist Thought.” Journal of Evolution and Technology 14( 1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Cole-Turner, Ron. 2015. “Going beyond the Human: Christians and Other Transhumanists.” Theology and Science 13(2), 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinerstein, Joel. 2006. “Technology and Its Discontents: On the Verge of the Posthuman.” American Quarterly 58(3), 569–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geraci, Robert M. 2010. Apocalyptic AI: Visions of Heaven, in Robotics, Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackelén, Antje. 2002. “The Image of God as Techno Sapiens.” Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science 37(2), 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzweil, Ray. 2005. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking.Google Scholar
Moravec, Hans. 1988. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Noble, David F. 1999. Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Passmore, John. 1970. The Perfectibility of Man. Duckworth.Google Scholar
Rothblatt, Martine. 2014. Virtually Human: The Promise and Peril of Digital Immortality. St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Tirosh-Samuelson, Hava and Mossman, K., eds. 2012. “Transhumanism.” Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science 47(5), Special Issue, 659–795.Google Scholar
Vinge, Vernor. 1993. “The Coming Technological Singularity.” Whole Earth Review (Winter). Reprinted in 2013 as “Technological Singularity” in The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on Science, Technology and Philosophy of the Human Future, ed. More, Max and Vita-More, Natasha. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bibliography

BBC. 2014. “Stephen Hawking Warns Artificial Intelligence Could End Mankind.” www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-30290540.Google Scholar
Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Rodney. 2018. “My Dated Predictions.” https://rodneybrooks.com/my-dated-predictions/.Google Scholar
Devlin, Hannah. 2018. “Killer Robots Will Only Exist if We Are Stupid Enough to Let Them.” The Guardian, 11 June. www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jun/11/killer-robots-will-only-exist-if-we-are-stupid-enough-to-let-them.Google Scholar
Diamond, Jared. 2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Viking.Google Scholar
Dubash, Manek. 2010. “Moore’s Law Is Dead, Says Gordon Moore.” Techworld. 13 April. https://hothardware.com/news/moores-law-is-dead-says-gordon-moore.Google Scholar
Gates, Bill. 2008. “A New Approach to Capitalism in the 21st Century.” Speech at the World Economic Forum, Davos, Switzerland, 24 January. www.networkworld.com/article/2282669/microsoft-s-bill-gates---a-new-approach-to-capitalism-in-the-21st-century-.html.Google Scholar
Goertzel, Ben. 2013. “Artificial General Intelligence and the Future of Humanity,” in The Transhumanist Reader, ed. More, Max and Vita-More, Natasha. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 2018. “How the Enlightenment Ends.” The Atlantic, June. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/henry-kissinger-ai-could-mean-the-end-of-human-history/559124/.Google Scholar
Lanier, Jaron. 2010. “The First Church of Robotics.” New York Times, 9 August. www.nytimes.com/2010/08/09/opinion/09lanier.html.Google Scholar
Loizos, Connie. 2017. “This Famous Roboticist Doesn’t Think Elon Musk Understands AI.” TechCrunch, 19 July. https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/19/this-famous-roboticist-doesnt-think-elon-musk-understands-ai/.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 1941. The Nature and Destiny of Man: A Christian Interpretation, Vol. 1, Human Nature. Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Peters, Ted. 2016. “H-: Transhumanism and the Posthuman Future: Will Technological Progress Get Us There?.” Metanexus. www.metanexus.net/essay/h-transhumanism-and-posthuman-future-will-technological-progress-get-us-there.Google Scholar
Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. 1959. The Phenomenon of Man, trans. Bernard Wall. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Yapching, Mark. 2015. “Fear of Death is the Reason behind Religious Fait: Larry King.” Christian Today, 28 February. www.christiantoday.com/article/fear.of.death.is.the.reason.behind.religious.faith.larry.king/48939.htm.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brockman, John, ed. 2019. Possible Minds: 25 Ways of Looking at AI. Penguin.Google Scholar
Delio, Ilia. 2020. Re-enchanting the Earth: Why AI Needs Religion. Orbis.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Noreen. 2002. In Our Image: Artificial Intelligence and the Human Spirit. Fortress.Google Scholar
Kaku, Michio. 2014. The Future of the Mind. Doubleday.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, Ray. 2006. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking.Google Scholar
Moravec, Hans. 1988. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Stuart. 2019. Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. Viking.Google Scholar
Tegmark, Max. Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Knopf.Google Scholar
Tippler, Frank. 1994. The Physics of Immortality: Modern Cosmology, God and the Resurrection of the Dead. Doubleday.Google Scholar
Trothen, Tracy, and Mercer, Calvin, eds. 2017. Religion and Human Enhancement: Death, Values, and Morality. Palgrave Studies in the Future of Humanity and Its Successors. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bibliography

Bryson, J. J. 2018. “Patiency Is Not a Virtue: The Design of Intelligent Systems and Systems of Ethics.” Ethics and Information Technology 20(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, S. et al. 2018. “Motivations and Risks of Machine Ethics.” Proceedings of the IEEE 107(3), 562–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coeckelbergh, M. 2010, “Robot Rights? Towards a Social-Relational Justification of Moral Consideration.” Ethics and Information Technology 12(3): 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coeckelbergh, M. 2020. AI Ethics. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giubilini, A. and Savulescu, J. 2018. “The Artificial Moral Advisor: The ‘Ideal Observer’ Meets Artificial Intelligence.” Philosophy & Technology 31(2), 169–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurzweil, R. 2000. The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. Penguin.Google Scholar
Lara, F. and Deckers, J. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence as a Socratic Assistant for Moral Enhancement.” Neuroethics 13(3), 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moor, J. H. 2020. “The Mature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics,” in Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics, ed. Wallach, Wendell and Asaro, Peter. Routledge.Google Scholar
Savulescu, J. and Maslen, H. 2015. “Moral Enhancement and Artificial Intelligence: Moral AI?.” In Beyond Artificial Intelligence. Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics, vol. 9, ed. Romportl, J., Zackova, E. and Kelemen, J.. Springer.Google Scholar
Tegmark, M. 2017. Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Knopf.Google Scholar
Wallach, W. and Allen, C. 2008. Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Clay, Elonda. 2004. “Subtle Impact: Technology Trends and the Black Church.” Journal of the Interdenominational Theological Center 31, 1–2.Google Scholar
Clay, Elonda. 2010. “A Black Theology of Liberation or Legitimation? A Postcolonial Response to Cone’s Black Theology and Black Power at Forty.” Black Theology 8(3), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Monica A. 2015. “Process Thought and Womanist Theology: Black Women’s Science Fiction as a Resource for Process Theology.” Cited 5, 1–19.Google Scholar
Curtin, Mary Ellen. 2000. Black Prisoners and Their World, Alabama, 1865–1900. University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Dean, Terrance and Andrews, Dale P. 2016. “Introduction: Afrofuturism in Black Theology: Race, Gender, Sexuality, and the State of Black Religion in the Black Metropolis.” Black Theology 14(1), 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Horace. 2000. “Their Own Received Them Not: African American Lesbians and Gays in Black Churches.” Theology & Sexuality 12, 88–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khademi, Aria and Honavar, Vasant. 2020. “Algorithmic Bias in Recidivism Prediction: A Causal Perspective.” Student abstract. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 34(10), 13839–13840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomax, Tamura A. 2018. Jezebel Unhinged. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lomax, Tamura A. 2016. “‘Technology of Living’: Toward a Black Feminist Religious Thought.” The Black Scholar 46(2), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mdingi, Hlulani. 2022. “Race and Robotics: Black Theology in the Digital Age.” In Africa and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, ed. Benyera, Everisto. Springer.Google Scholar
Pinn, Anthony B. 2003. Terror and Triumph: The Nature of Black Religion. Fortress.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Buber, Martin. 2013 [1937]. I and Thou, trans. Ronald Gregor Smith. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Donath, Judith. 2020. “Ethical Issues in Our Relationship with Artificial Entities.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics and AI, ed. Dubber, Markus D., Pasquale, Frank and Das, Sunit. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dumouchel, Paul and Damiano, Luisa. 2017. Living with Robots, trans. Malcolm DeBevoise. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerst, Anne. 2005. God in the Machine: What Robots Teach Us about Humanity and God. PlumeGoogle Scholar
Heider, Fritz and Simmel, Marianne. 1944. “An Experimental Study of Apparent Behaviour.” The American Journal of Psychology 57, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzfeld, Noreen. 2002. In Our Image: Artificial Intelligence and the Human Spirit. Augsburg Fortress.Google Scholar
Huang, Lixiao et al. 2021. “Toward a Generalised Model of Human Emotional Attachment.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 22(2), 178–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mori, Masahiro, MacDorman, K. F. and Kageki, N. 2012. “The Uncanny Valley [From the Field].” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 19(2), 98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musiał, Maciej. 2019. Enchanting Robots: Intimacy, Magic, and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Gieblyn, Meghan. 2021. “A Dog’s Inner Life: What a Robot Pet Taught Me about Consciousness.” The Guardian, 10 August. www.theguardian.com/science/2021/aug/10/dogs-inner-life-what-robot-pet-taught-me-about-consciousness-artificial-intelligence.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kathleen. 2019. “The Human Relationship in the Ethics of Robotics: A Call to Martin Buber’s I and Thou.” AI & Society 34, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samani, Hooman Aghaebrahimi et al. 2010. “Towards a Formulation of Love in Human–Robot Interaction.” In 19th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
Samani, Hooman Aghaebrahimi et al. 2011. “A Design Process for Lovotics.” HRPR 2010, 118–125.Google Scholar
Smith, Joshua K. 2021. Robot Theology: Old Questions through New Media. Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. 2005 [1984]. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. 2005 [2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Social and Moral Issues
  • Edited by Beth Singler, Universität Zürich, Fraser Watts, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Religion and Artificial Intelligence
  • Online publication: 20 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031721.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Social and Moral Issues
  • Edited by Beth Singler, Universität Zürich, Fraser Watts, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Religion and Artificial Intelligence
  • Online publication: 20 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031721.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Social and Moral Issues
  • Edited by Beth Singler, Universität Zürich, Fraser Watts, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Religion and Artificial Intelligence
  • Online publication: 20 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031721.009
Available formats
×