Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:50:32.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Artificial Companions and Spiritual Enhancement

from Part III - Religious Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2024

By
Yorick Wilks
Edited by
Beth Singler  and
Fraser Watts
Beth Singler
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Fraser Watts
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Recent progress has been made towards developing automated companions for the elderly. Building on work in the early days of artificial intelligence that showed that computers could deliver non-directive counselling, the possibility arises that computers could be used to provide people with an opportunity for spiritual conversation. Research using Wizard-of-Oz methodology shows that at least some people find it helpful to have spiritual conversations with what they believe to be an avatar, and work using GPT-3 shows that computers can be an acceptable interlocutor in spiritual conversation. The possibility now arises of developing a spiritual companion that would be personalised for a particular individual and become familiar with their spiritual life. This would not, in every way, replace a human spiritual guide, but could provide a resource that at least some people would find valuable and would assist in their spiritual development.

Keywords

automatedspiritualcompanionWizard-of-OzGPT-3avatarcounselling
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Religion and Artificial Intelligence , pp. 275 - 292
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balle, S. 2023. “Theological Dimensions of Humanlike Robots: A Roadmap for Theological Inquiry.” Theology and Science 21(1), 132–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, S. 1965. “Cybernetics and the Knowledge of God.” Month 34, 291–303Google Scholar
Catizone, R. et al. 2011. “Some Background on Dialogue Management and Conversational Speech for Dialogue Systems.” Computer Speech and Language 25(2), 128–139.Google Scholar
Colby, K. 1969. “Dialogues between Humans and an Artificial Belief System.” IJCAI 69: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 319–324Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1971. “Intentional Systems.” Journal of Philosophy 68, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, K., Darcy, A. and Vierhile, M. 2017. “Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults with Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial.” JMIR Mental Health 4(2), e19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffney, H., Mansell, W. and Tai, S. 2019. “Revisiting Conversational Agents in the Treatment of Mental Health Problems: Mixed-Method Systematic Review.” JMIR Mental Health 6(10), e14166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. 2008. Persons and Things. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ly, K., Ly, A. and Andersson, G. 2017. “A Fully Automated Conversational Agent for Promoting Mental Well-being: A Pilot RCT Using Mixed methods.” Internet Interventions 10, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenfeld, A. 1966. “Religion and the Robot: Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Religious Anthropologies.” Tradition: A Journal of Orthodox Thought 8(3), 15–26.Google Scholar
Schank, R. 1995. Tell Me a Story: Narrative and Intelligence. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schiavo, G. et al. 2016. “Wizard of Oz Studies with Older Adults: A Methodological Note.” In International Reports on Socio-Informatics (IRSI), Proceedings of the COOP 2016 – Symposium on Challenges and Experiences in Designing for an Ageing Society, ed. Garschall, M. et al., 13(3), 93–100.Google Scholar
Turing, A. M. 1950. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind 59(236), 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weizenbaum, J. 1966. “ELIZA: A Computer Programme for the Study of Natural Language Communication between Men and Machines.” Communications of the ACM 9, 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Y. and Dorubantu, M. 2019. “Moral Orthoses: A New Approach to Human and Machine Ethics.” Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science 54(4), 1004–1021.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×