Adorno, T. et al. 1976. The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. Translated by Adey, Glenn and Frisby, David. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Agassi, J. 1960. ‘Methodological individualism’, British Journal of Sociology 11, 244–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agassi, J. 1975. ‘Institutional individualism’, British Journal of Sociology 26, 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle, [1869], The Nicomachean Ethics, tr Williams, Robert. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar

Artigas, M. 1999. The Ethical Nature of Karl Popper’s Theory of Knowledge. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Baert, P. 2005. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Towards Pragmatism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Bartley, W. 1987. ‘Alienation alienated: The economics of knowledge versus the psychology and sociology of knowledge’, chapter XVIII in Radnitzky, Gerard and Bartley, W. W., III, eds., Evolutionary Epistemology, Theory of Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Boland, L. 1979. ‘Knowledge and the role of institutions in economic theory’, Journal of Economic Issues 8, 957–72.Google Scholar

Boland, L. 1982. The Foundations of Economic Method. London: Geo Allen & Unwin. Second edition as The Foundations of Economic Method: A Popperian Perspective, London: Routledge 2003.Google Scholar

Bunge, M. 2004. ‘Clarifying some misunderstandings about social systems and their mechanisms’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34(3), 371–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caldwell, B. 2004. Hayek’s Challenge. An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Caldwell, B. 2005. ‘Popper and Hayek: Who Influenced Whom?’ In Jarvie, Ian, Miller, David and Milford, Karl, eds., Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, vol. 1, pp. 111–24. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Clarke, S. 2002. ‘Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32, 131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delanty, G. and Strydom, Piet, eds. 2003. Philosophies of Social Science. The Classic and Contemporary Readings. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Fuller, S. 2003. Kuhn vs. Popper. The Struggle for the Soul of Science. Cambridge: Icon Books.Google Scholar

Gellner, E. 1959. Words and Things. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar

Gellner, E. 1976. ‘An ethic of cognition’, In Cohen, R. S., Feyerabend, P. K., and Wartofsky, M. W., eds., Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 161–77.Google Scholar

Gellner, E. 1992. ‘The uniqueness of truth’, Cambridge: King’s College. Reprinted in his Anthropology and Politics, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar

Gorton, W. 2006. Karl Popper and the Social Sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacohen, M. 2000. Karl Popper. The Formative Years, 1902–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarvie, I. 1959. ‘Reply to Taylor’, Universities and Left Review 7, 57.Google Scholar

Jarvie, I. 1960. ‘Professor Passmore on the objectivity of history’. Philosophy 35, 355–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarvie, I. 1964. The Revolution in Anthropology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Jarvie, I. 1982. ‘Popper on the difference between the natural and the social sciences’, in Levinson, Paul, ed., In Pursuit of Truth. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities, pp. 83–107.Google Scholar

Jarvie, I. 1999. ‘Rationality and situational logic in Popper’s scientific work’, http://www.yorku.ca/jarvie/online_publications/VIENNAWD.pdf. In Spanish in Perona, Angeles Jimenez, ed., Contrastando a Popper. Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca Nueva, 2008, pp. 63–85.Google Scholar

Jarvie, I. 2001a. ‘Science in a democratic republic’, Philosophy of Science 68, 545–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarvie, I. 2001b. The Republic of Science. The Emergence of Popper’s Social View of Science, 1935–1945. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarvie, I. and Agassi, Joseph. 1967. ‘The problem of the rationality of magic’, British Journal of Sociology 18, 55–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keeley, B. 1999. ‘Of conspiracy theories’, Journal of Philosophy 96, 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lichtheim, G. 1967. ‘Introduction’, Harper Torchbook Edition of Hegel, G. W. F., The Phenomenology of Mind (1807), New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar

Martin, M. and McIntyre, Lee C., eds. 1994. Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. 1936. ‘The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action’, American Sociological Review 1, 894–904.Google Scholar

Merton, R. 1948. ‘The self-fulfilling prophecy’, Antioch Review, Summer, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, D. 1983. A Pocket Popper. London: Fontana. Reprinted as Popper Selections.Google Scholar

Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Outhwaite, W. 2000. ‘The philosophy of social science’, in Turner, Bryan S., ed., The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, second edition. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 47–70.Google Scholar

Pigden, C. 1995. ‘Popper revisited, or what is wrong with conspiracy theories?’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitcher, G. 1964. The Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1930–1933. Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie. Tübingen: Mohr 1979.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1934. Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Julius Springer Verlag. English translation The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson 1959.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1940. ‘What is dialectic?’, Mind 49, 403–26. Reprinted in Popper 1963, pp. 312–35.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1944–45. ‘The poverty of historicism I, II, & III’, Economica. Book version London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1957.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1948. ‘Prediction and prophecy and their significance for social theory’, Proceedings of the Xth International Congress of Philosophy, Amsterdam, 1, 82–91. Reprinted with an altered title in Popper 1963, pp. 336–46.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1949. ‘Towards a rational theory of tradition’, The Rationalist Annual 1949. London: Watts & Co. Reprinted in Popper 1963, pp. 120–35.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1950. ‘Indeterminism in Quantum Physics and in Classical Physics. Parts I & II’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1, nos. 2 and 3, pp. 117–33, 173–95.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1961. ‘The logic of the social sciences’, in The Positivism Dispute in German Sociology, trs. Adey, Glyn and Frisby, David, London: Heinemann 1976, pp. 87–104. Originally in Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie, Maus, Heinz and Fürstenberg, Friedrich, eds., Neuwied and Berlin: Hermann Leuchterhand Verlag 1969. References are to the reprint of this paper in his In Search of a Better World, London: Routledge 1992, chapter 5.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1972. Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1973. ‘Indeterminism Is Not Enough. A Philosophical Essay’, Encounter 40, no. 4 (April), 20–26. See also 1982.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1974a. ‘Autobiography of Karl Popper’, in Schilpp 1974, 1, pp. 1–181.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1974b. ‘Replies to my critics’, in Schilpp 1974, 2, pp. 961–1197.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1975. ‘The myth of the framework’, in Freeman, Eugene, ed., The Abdication of Philosophy. Philosophy and the Public Good. Essays in Honor of Paul Arthur Schilpp. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, pp. 23–48. Reprinted in Popper 1994a, pp. 33–64.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1976a. Unended Quest. London: Fontana/Collins. Revised version of 1974a.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1976b. ‘Reason or Revolution?’. in Adorno, et al., pp. 288–300.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1982. The Open Universe. ed. Bartley, W. W., III. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1994a The Myth of the Framework. ed. Notturno, M. A., London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1994b. ‘Models, Instruments, and Truth’, in Popper 1994a, pp. 154–84.Google Scholar

Rhees, R. 1947. ‘Social engineering’, Mind (N.S.) 56, 317–31.Google ScholarPubMed

Russell, B. 1940. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Ryle, G. 1947. Review of Popper 1945. Mind (N.S.) 56, 167–72.Google Scholar

Salmon, W. 1990. Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Schilpp, P. ed. 1974. The Philosophy of Karl Popper. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Shearmur, J. 1996 The Political Thought of Karl Popper. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Simkin, C. 1993. Popper’s Views on Natural and Social Science, Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokes, G. 1998. Popper. Philosophy, Politics and Scientific Method. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Turner, S. and Roth, Paul, eds., 2003, The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Udehn, L. 2001. Methodological Individualism: Background, History and Meaning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Udehn, L. 2003. ‘The methodology of rational choice’, in Turner and Roth 2003, pp. 143–65.Google Scholar

Uebel, T. 2003. ‘Twentieth century philosophy of social science in the analytic tradition’, in Turner and Roth 2003, pp. 64–88.Google Scholar

Watkins, J. 1952. ‘Ideal types and historical explanation’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3, 22–43. Revised and expanded in Feigl, H. and Brodbeck, M., eds., Readings in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953, pp. 723–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watkins, J. 1970. ‘Imperfect rationality’, in Borger, Robert and Cioffi, Frank, eds., Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–217.Google Scholar

Wettersten, John. 1992. The Roots of Critical Rationalism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wisdom, J. O. 1963. ‘Metamorphoses of the verifiability theory of meaning’, Mind 73, 335–47.Google Scholar

Wisdom, J. O. 1970. ‘Situational individualism and the emergent group properties’, in Borger, R. and Cioffi, F., eds., Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–96.Google Scholar