Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Ethics
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The History of Natural Law Ethics
- Part II The Revival of Natural Law Ethics
- Part III Natural Law Ethics and Religion
- Part IV Applied Natural Law Ethics
- Part V Natural Law Ethics
- References
- Index
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions (continued from page ii)
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Ethics
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The History of Natural Law Ethics
- Part II The Revival of Natural Law Ethics
- Part III Natural Law Ethics and Religion
- Part IV Applied Natural Law Ethics
- Part V Natural Law Ethics
- References
- Index
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions (continued from page ii)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Ethics , pp. 318 - 341Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Primary Sources
Albo, J. 1929. Sefer ha-‘Ikkarim (Book of Principles). 4 vols. Husik, Isaac (ed. and trans.). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
Althusius, J. 1964. The Politics of Johannes Althusius. Carney, Frederick S. (trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1920. Summa Theologica. Fathers of the English Dominican Province (trans.). London: Burns Oates and Washbourne.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1929. Scriptum super Sententiis Magistri Petri Lombardi. Paris: P. Lethielleux.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1934. In Decem Libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum Expositio. Turin, Italy: Marietti.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1947. Summa Theologica. Fathers of the English Dominican Province (trans.). New York: Benziger Brothers.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1948. Summa Theologica. Fathers of the English Dominican Province (trans.). Westminster, MD: Christian Classics.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 2009. Treatise on Law. Freddoso, A. (ed.). South Bend, IN: St Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1941. The Basic Works of Aristotle. McKeon, R. (ed.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Revised Oxford translation. Vol. 2. Barnes, Jonathan (ed.), Ross, W. D. and Urmson, J. O. (trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 2000. Nicomachean Ethics. Crisp, Roger (trans. and ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Averröes. 1921. ‘Ibn Rushd “On the Harmony of Religion and Philosophy”’, in The Philosophy and Theology of Averroes, Jamil-al-Rahman, Mohammed (trans.). Baroda, India: A. G. Widgery.Google Scholar
Avicenna. 1945. ‘A Treatise on Love by Ibn Sina’, Fackenheim, Emil L. (trans.). Mediaeval Studies 7: 208–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beza, T. 1956. Concerning the Rights of Rulers over their Subjects and the Duties of Subjects toward Their Rulers. Henri-Louis, Gonin (trans.). Cape Town and Pretoria: H.A.U.M.Google Scholar
Calvin, J. 2006 [1960]. Institutes of the Christian Religion. McNeill, John T. (ed.). Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 1991. On Duties. Griffin, M. T. and Atkins, E. M. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 1998. The Republic and the Laws. Rudd, N. (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 1999. ‘On the Commonwealth’ and ‘On the Laws’. Zetzel, James E. G (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 2001. On Moral Ends. Annas, Julia (ed.), Woolf, Raphael (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 2008. The Nature of the Gods. Walsh, P. G. (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotton, J. 1647. The Bloudy Tenent Washed and Made White in the Blood of the Lamb. London: Matthew Symmons.Google Scholar
Cotton, J. 1663. A Discourse about Civil Government in a New Plantation Whose Design Is Religion. Cambridge, UK: Samuel Green and Marmaduke Johnson.Google Scholar
Cumberland, R. 2005 [1672]. A Treatise of the Laws of Nature. Jon, Parkin (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Epictetus. 2014. Discourses, Fragments, Handbook. Hard, Robin (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. 1926 [1631]. Introduction to the Jurisprudence of Holland. Lee, R. W. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. 2004 [1609]. The Free Sea. David, Armitage (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. 2005 [1625]. The Rights of War and Peace. 3 vols. Richard, Tuck (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. 2012 [1627]. The Truth of the Christian Religion. Antognazza, Maria Rosa (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1998 [1642/1647]. On the Citizen. Tuck, Richard (ed.). Silverthorne, Michael (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 2012 [1651]. Leviathan. 3 vols. Noel, Malcolm (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, R. 2013. Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity. 3 vols. McGrade, Arthur S. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and Gerson, L. P. 2008. The Stoics Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1785. The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Gregor, M. and Korsgaard, C. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1972 [1706]. ‘Opinion on the Principles of Pufendorf’, in Leibniz: Political Writings, Riley, Patrick (ed.), pp. 64–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luther, M. 1883. D. Martin Luthers Werke. Gesamtausgabe, Kritische. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar
Maimonides, M. 1912. Eight Chapters of Maimonides on Ethics. Samuel ibn Tibbon and Joseph Isaac Gorfinkle (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Maimonides, M. 1963. Guide of the Perplexed [Arabic: Dalâlat al-hâirîn; Hebrew: Moreh Nevukhim]. 2 vols. Shlomo Pines (trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Translated into Hebrew by Michael Schwartz. 2002. Ramat Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University Press.)Google Scholar
Maimonides, M. 1972. ‘Kings and Wars’, in A Maimonides Reader, Twersky, Isadore (ed.), pp. 215–30. New York: Behrman House.Google Scholar
Melanchthon, P. 2008. Ethicae Doctrinae Elementa et Enarratio Libri quinti Ethicorum. Frank, Günter (ed.). Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, M. 1983. Jerusalem; or, On Religious Power and Judaism. Allan Arkush (trans.). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1993 [1903]. Principia Ethica. Rev. edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. 1729 [1672]. Of the Law of Nature and Nations. Kennett, Basil (trans.). London: printed for J. Walthoe et al.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. 1991 [1673]. On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law. Tully, James (ed.). Silverthorne, Michael (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. 2002 [1695]. The Divine Feudal Law: or, Covenants with Mankind, Represented. Zurbuchen, Simone (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. 2014. The Pufendorf Lectures: Annotations from the Teaching of Samuel Pufendorf, 1672–74. Lindberg, Bo (ed.). Stockholm: KVHAA.Google Scholar
Saadiah ben Joseph al-Fayyumi Gaon. 1948. The Book of Beliefs and Opinions. Rosenblatt, Samuel (trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Seneca, L. A. 2015. Letters on Ethics to Lucilius. Graver, Margaret and Long, A. A. (trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 2012 [1874]. The Methods of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1981 [1776]. The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, vol. II, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Campbell, R. R. and Skinner, A. S. (eds.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1982 [1759]. The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, vol. I, The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L. (eds.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1982 [1762–3, 1766]. The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, vol. V, Lectures on Jurisprudence. Meel, R. L., Raphael, D. D. and Stein, P. G. (eds.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. 2001. Theological-Political Treatise. 2nd edn. Shirley, Samuel (trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. 2016 [1670]. ‘Theological-Political Treatise’, in The Collected Works of Spinoza, vol. II, Edwin, Curley (ed.), pp. 65–356. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Suárez, F. 2015. ‘De Legibus, ac Deo Legislatore’, in Suárez: Selections from Three Works, Pink, Thomas (ed.), pp. 1–752. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Al-Ayni, Badr al-Din. 2000. Al-Binaya Sharh al-Hidaya. Shaʿbān, Ayman Ṣāliḥ (ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.Google Scholar
Almotahari, M. and Hosein, A. 2015. ‘Is Anything Just Plain Good?’ Philosophical Studies 23: 1485–1508.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 2005. ‘Virtue Ethics: What Kind of Naturalism?’, in Virtue Ethics, Old and New, Gardiner, Stephen M. (ed.), pp. 11–29. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981a. ‘Mr Truman’s Degree’, in The Collected Philosophical Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe, vol. III (Ethics, Religion and Politics), pp. 62–71. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981b. ‘The Justice of the Present War Examined’, in The Collected Philosophical Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe, vol. III (Ethics, Religion and Politics), pp. 72–81. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981c. ‘On Promising and Its Justice, and Whether It Need Be Respected in Foro Interno’, in The Collected Philosophical Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe, vol. III (Ethics, Religion and Politics), pp. 10–21. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005a. ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, in Human Life, Action, and Ethics: Essays by G.E.M. Anscombe, Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke (eds.), pp. 169–94. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2005b. ‘Good and Bad Human Action’, in Human Life, Action, and Ethics: Essays by G.E.M. Anscombe, Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke (eds.), pp. 195–206. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Ashley, B. M. 1994. ‘What Is the End of the Human Person? The Vision of God and Integral Human Fulfilment’, in Moral Truth and Moral Tradition: Essays in Honour of Peter Geach and Elizabeth Anscombe, Gormally, Luke (ed.), pp. 69–86. Blackrock: Four Courts Press.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 2008. ‘Cicero on Natural Law and the Laws of the State’. Classical Antiquity 27: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auda, J. 2016. Maqasid al-Shari’ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. Herndon, VA: IIIT.Google Scholar
Austin, C. 2017. ‘Aristotelian Essentialism: Essence in an Age of Evolution’. Synthese 194, no. 7: 2539–56.Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, J. 2003 [1718]. ‘The Judgment of an Anonymous Writer’, in Pufendorf: The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David (eds.), pp. 266–305. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Barnard, J. 1938 [1734]. ‘The Throne Established by Righteousness’, in The Puritans, Miller, Perry and Johnson, Thomas (eds.), pp. 270–76. New York: American Book Company.Google Scholar
Barney, S. A. 2010. The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville. Lewis, W. J., Beach, J. A and Berghof, O. (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barth, K. 1941. This Christian Cause: A Letter to Great Britain from Switzerland. Mackay, John A. (ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barth, K. 1960. Church Dogmatics. Bromiley, G. W. and Torrance, T. F. (eds.). London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Barth, K. and Brunner, E. 1946. Natural Theology. Fraenkel, Peter (trans.). London: Geoffrey Bles.Google Scholar
Batnitzky, L. 2016. ‘Leo Strauss’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/strauss-leo.Google Scholar
Berkman, J. and Mattison, W. C. III. 2014. Searching for a Universal Ethic. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Berman, H. J. 2003. Law and Revolution II: The Impact of the Protestant Reformations on the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. M. 2002. ‘Re-enchanting Nature’, in Reading McDowell: On Mind and World, Smith, Nicholas H. (ed.), chapter 12. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhuta, N. 2012. ‘Rethinking the Universality of Human Rights: A Comparative Historical Proposal for the Idea of “Common Ground” with Other Moral Traditions’, in Islamic Law and International Human Rights Law: Searching for Common Ground?, Emon, Anver M., Ellis, Mark and Glahn, Benjamin (eds.), pp. 123–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boulter, S. 2013. Metaphysics from a Biological Point of View. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1987. ‘“The Force of Law”: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’, Terdiman, Richard (trans.). Hastings Law Journal 38: 814–53.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1988. Homo Academicus. Collier, Peter (trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, J. 1998. ‘The Place of Religion in the Practical Reasoning of Individuals and Groups’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 43: 1–24.Google Scholar
Boyle, J. 2002. ‘Free Choice, Incomparably Valuable Options, and Incommensurable Categories of Good’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 47: 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. 2005. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brock, S. 2005. ‘Natural Inclination and the Intelligibility of the Good in Thomistic Natural Law’. Vera Lex 6, nos. 1–2: 57–78.Google Scholar
Brock, S. 2011. ‘Natural Law, the Understanding of Principles, and Universal Good’. Nova et Vetera 9: 671–706.Google Scholar
Brooke, C. 2012. Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. 2014. The Stoic Sage: The Early Stoics on Wisdom, Sagehood and Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brugger, C. 2014. Capital Punishment and Roman Catholic Tradition. 2nd edn. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Brüllmann, P. Forthcoming. ‘Nature and Psychology in Cicero’s Republic’, in State and Nature: Essays in Ancient Political Philosophy, Adamson, Peter and Rapp, Christof (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. and Brennan, G. 1987. ‘The Normative Purpose of Economic “Science”: Rediscovery of an Eighteenth Century Method’, in Economics: Between Predictive Science and Moral Philosophy, Buchanan, James (ed.), pp. 51–65. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Buckle, S. 1991. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Budziszewski, J. 2018. ‘The Same as to Knowledge’, in Natural Law Today: The Present State of the Perennial Philosophy, Wolfe, C. and Brust, S. (eds.), pp. 53–70. Lanham, MD: Lexington Press.Google Scholar
Buller, D. 1999. Function, Selection, and Design. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Butterworth, C. 2001. ‘Translator’s Introduction to the Decisive Treatise’, in Decisive Treatise and Epistle Dedicatory (Averroes), Butterworth, Charles E. (trans.), pp. xvii–xxxviii. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
Carney, F. S. 1967. ‘Outline of a Natural Law Procedure for Christian Ethics’. Journal of Religion 47, no. 1: 26–38.Google Scholar
Carney, F. S. 1995. Introduction to Johannes Althusius, Politica: An Abridged Translation of Politics Methodically Set Forth and Illustrated with Sacred and Profane Examples. Carney, Frederick S. (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chakravartty, A. 2013. ‘Dispositions for Scientific Realism’, in Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism, Groff, R. and Greco, J. (eds.), pp. 113–27. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chappell, T. 2013. ‘There Are No Thin Concepts’, in Thick Concepts, Kirchin, S. (ed.), pp. 182–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, S. G. 2017. ‘The Objectivity of Ordinary Life’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20, no. 4: 709–21.Google Scholar
Chroust, A.-H. 1950. ‘St Augustine’s Philosophical Theory of Law’. Notre Dame Law Review 25, no. 2: 285–315.Google Scholar
Copp, D. and Sobel, D. 2004. ‘Morality and Virtue: An Assessment of Some Recent Work in Virtue Ethics’. Ethics 114: 514–54.Google Scholar
Crowe, M. B. 1951. ‘The Natural Law before St Thomas’. The Irish Ecclesiastical Record 76: 194–204.Google Scholar
Crowe, M. B. 1956. ‘The Term “Synderesis” and the Scholastics’. Irish Theological Quarterly 23, nos. 2/3: 151–64 and 228–45.Google Scholar
Crowe, M. B. 1977. The Changing Profile of the Natural Law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Cunningham, L. S. 2009. Intractable Disputes about the Natural Law: Alasdair MacIntyre and Critics. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, S. B. 1967. ‘Albertus Magnus on Natural Law’. Journal of the History of Ideas XXVIII: 479–502.Google Scholar
D’Entrèves, A. P. 1948. Aquinas: Selected Political Writings. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. 2012a. ‘Grotius at the Creation of Modern Moral Philosophy’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94, no. 3: 296–325.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. 2012b. ‘Pufendorf on Morality, Sociability, and Moral Powers’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50, no. 2: 213–38.Google Scholar
Daston, L. and Stolleis, M. 2008. Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe: Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
David, J. E. 2010. ‘Maimonides, Nature and Natural Law’. Journal of Law, Philosophy and Culture 5, no. 1: 67–82.Google Scholar
De Anna, G. 2018. ‘Potentiality, Natural Normativity and Practical Reason’. The Journal of Value Inquiry 52, no. 3: 307–26.Google Scholar
De Koninck, C. 1943. De la Primauté du Bien Commun contre les Personnalistes. Montréal: Fides.Google Scholar
Devitt, M. 2008. ‘Resurrecting Biological Essentialism’. Philosophy of Science 75: 344–82.Google Scholar
Dewan, L. 1986. ‘Jacques Maritain and the Philosophy of Cooperation’, in Altérité Vivre Ensemble Différents: Approches Pluridisciplinaires, Gourges, M. and Mailhiot, G. (eds.), pp. 109–17. Montréal: Éditions Bellarmin.Google Scholar
Dewan, L. 2007. ‘Natural Law in the First Act of Freedom: Maritain Revisited’, in Wisdom, Law, and Virtue: Essays in Thomistic Ethics, pp. 221–41. Bronx, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Dumsday, T. 2012. ‘A New Argument for Intrinsic Biological Essentialism’. The Philosophical Quarterly 62: 486–504.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. 2012. Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Efron, N. J. 2002. ‘Nature, Human Nature, and Jewish Nature in Early Modern Europe’. Science in Context 15, no. 1: 29–49.Google Scholar
Elder, C. 2008. ‘Biological Species Are Natural Kinds’. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46: 339–62.Google Scholar
Elder, C. 2011. Familiar Objects and Their Shadows. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. 2009. The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Emon, A. M. 2006. ‘Ḥuqūq Allāh and Ḥuqūq al-ʿIbād: A Legal Heuristic for a Natural Rights Regime’. Islamic Law and Society 13, no. 3: 325–91.Google Scholar
Emon, A. M. 2014a. ‘Islamic Natural Law Theories’, in Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian and Islamic Trialogue, Emon, Anver M., Levering, Matthew and Novak, David (eds.), pp. 144–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emon, A. M. 2014b. ‘On Islam and Islamic Natural Law: A Response to the International Theological Commission’s “Look at Natural Law”’, in Searching for a Universal Ethic: Multidisciplinary, Ecumenical, and Interfaith Responses to the Catholic Natural Law Tradition, Berkman, John and Mattison, William C. (eds.), pp. 125–35. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Emon, A. M. 2018. ‘On Reading Fiqh’, in The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law, Emon, Anver M. and Ahmed, Rumee (eds.), pp. 45–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feser, E. 2008. The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism. South Bend, IN: St Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Feser, E. 2013. Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Feser, E. 2014a. ‘Being, the Good, and the Guise of the Good’, in Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives in Metaphysics, Novotny, D. and Novak, E. (eds.), pp. 84–103. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feser, E. 2014b. Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae.Google Scholar
Feser, E. 2019. Aristotle’s Revenge: The Metaphysical Foundations of Physical and Biological Science. Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1981. ‘Natural Law and the “Is”-“Ought” Question: An Invitation to Professor Veatch’. Catholic Lawyer 26, no. 4 (Autumn): 266–77.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1987. ‘Natural Inclinations and Natural Rights: Deriving “Ought” from “Is” according to Aquinas’, in Lex et Libertas: Freedom and Law according to St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 30, Elders, L. et al. (eds.), pp. 43–55. Rome: Studi Tomistici.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1990. ‘Allocating Risks and Suffering: Some Hidden Traps’, in The Collected Works of John Finnis, vol. IV, Philosophy of Law, pp. 337–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1992. ‘Economics, Justice, and the Value of Life’, in The Collected Works of John Finnis, vol. III, Human Rights and Common Good, pp. 242–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1996. ‘Is Natural Law Theory Compatible with Limited Government?’, in Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality, George, R. (ed.), pp. 1–26. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1997. ‘Commensuration and Public Reason’, in Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, Chang, R. (ed.), pp. 215–33. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011a. Natural Law and Natural Rights. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011b. ‘Practical Reason’s Foundations’, in Collected Essays of John Finnis: Reasons in Action, pp. 19–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J., Grisez, G. and Boyle, J. 1987a. Nuclear Deterrence, Morality, and Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J., Grisez, G. and Boyle, J. 1987b. ‘Practical Principles, Moral Truth, and Ultimate Ends’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 32, no. 1: 99–151.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, W. J. 2008. ‘Robust Ethical Realism, Non-Naturalism, and Normativity’, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 3, Shafer-Landau, R. (ed.), pp. 159–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. and Piattelli-Palmarini, M. 2011. What Darwin Got Wrong. Updated edn. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Foot, P. 1978. ‘The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect’, in Virtues and Vices. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foot, P. 2002. ‘Rationality and Virtue’, in Moral Dilemmas, pp. 159–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fortin, E. 1982. ‘The New Rights Theory and Natural Law’. The Review of Politics 44, no. 4: 590–612.Google Scholar
Fox, M. 1990a. ‘Maimonides and Aquinas on Natural Law’, in Interpreting Maimonides: Studies in Methodology, Metaphysics, and Moral Philosophy, pp. 124–51. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fox, M. 1990b. ‘Maimonides’ Views on the Relations of Law and Morality’, in Interpreting Maimonides: Studies in Methodology, Metaphysics, and Moral Philosophy, pp. 199–226. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frank, G. 2008. ‘Die praktische Philosophie Philipp Melanchthons und die Tradition des frühneuzeitlichen Aristotelismus’, in Philipp Melanchthon, Ethicae Doctrinae Elementa et Enarratio Libri quinti Ethicorum, Frank, Günter (ed.), pp. xix–xlii. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Freddoso, A. J. (trans.). 2009. Thomas Aquinas, Treatise on Law: The Complete Text, Summa Theologiae I-II, Questions 90–108. South Bend, IN: St Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Frey, C. and Frey, J. A. 2017. ‘G.E.M. Anscombe on the Analogical Unity of Intention in Action and Perception’. Analytic Philosophy 58, no. 3: 202–47.Google Scholar
Frey, J. A. 2018. ‘How to Be an Ethical Naturalist’, in Philippa Foot on Goodness and Virtue, Hacker-Wright, John (ed.), pp. 47–84. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnebet, M. 1948. ‘L’Amour Naturel de Dieu chez Saint Thomas et ses Contemporains’. Revue Thomiste 48: 394–446.Google Scholar
Gallagher, D. 1999. ‘Thomas Aquinas on Self-Love as the Basis for Love of Others’. Acta Philosophica 8: 23–44.Google Scholar
George, R. 1993. Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
George, R. P. and Duke, G. 2017. The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1988. ‘Personhood and Personality: The Four-Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 169–99.Google Scholar
Goldish, M. 2010–11. ‘Perspectives on Uriel da Costa’s “Examination of a Life”’. Studia Rosenthaliana 42/43: 1–23.Google Scholar
Gómez-Lobo, A. 2002. Morality and the Human Goods: An Introduction to Natural Law Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, M. 2011. Moses Mendelssohn: Writings on Judaism, Christianity and the Bible. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
Goyette, J., Latkovic, M. S. and Myers, R. S. 2004. St. Thomas Aquinas and the Natural Law Tradition: Contemporary Perspectives. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Grabill, S. J. 2006. Rediscovering the Natural Law in Reformed Theological Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Griffel, F. 2007. ‘The Harmony of Natural Law and Shari’a in Islamist Theology’, in Sharia: Islamic Law in the Contemporary Context, Amanat, Abbas and Griffel, Frank (eds.), pp. 38–61. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1965. ‘The First Principle of Practical Reason: A Commentary on the Summa Theologiae, 1–2, Question 94, Article 2’. Natural Law Forum 10: 168–201.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1978. ‘Against Consequentialism’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 23, no. 1: 21–72.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1983. The Way of the Lord Jesus, vol. 1, Christian Moral Principles. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1987. ‘Natural Law and Natural Inclinations: Some Comments and Clarifications’. New Scholasticism 61: 307–20.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1993. The Way of the Lord Jesus, Vol. 2, Living a Christian Life. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1999. ‘Against Consequentialism’, in Proportionalism: For and Against, Kaczor, Christopher (ed.), pp. 239–94. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 2013. ‘Natural Law and the Transcendent Source of Human Fulfillment’, in Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis, Keown, J. and George, R. (eds.), pp. 443–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. and Shaw, R. 1988. Beyond the New Morality: The Responsibilities of Freedom. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Groff, R. and Greco, J. 2013. Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. 2002. ‘The Study of Arabic Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: An Essay on the Historiography of Arabic Philosophy’. British Journal of Middle East Studies 29, no. 1: 5–25.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K. 1996. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K. 2002. ‘The Moral Conservatism of Natural Rights’, in Natural Law and Civil Sovereignty, Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David (eds.), pp. 27–42. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K. 2004. ‘Protestant Natural Law Theory: A General Interpretation’, in New Essays on the History of Autonomy, Brender, Natalie and Krasnoff, Larry (eds.), pp. 92–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K. and Seidler, M. J. 2016. ‘Natural Law: Law, Rights and Duties’, in A Companion to Intellectual History, Whatmore, Richard and Young, Brian (eds.), pp. 377–401. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haara, H. 2016. ‘Pufendorf on Passions and Sociability’. Journal of the History of Ideas 77, no. 3: 423–44.Google Scholar
Haara, H. 2018. Pufendorf’s Theory of Sociability: Passions, Habits and Social Order. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 2010. Human Nature: The Categorial Framework. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacker-Wright, J. 2009a. ‘Human Nature, Personhood, and Ethical Naturalism’. Philosophy 84, no. 329: 413–27.Google Scholar
Hacker-Wright, J. 2009b. ‘What Is Natural about Foot’s Ethical Naturalism?’ Ratio (new series) XXII: 308–21.Google Scholar
Hacker-Wright, J. 2012. ‘Ethical Naturalism and the Constitution of Agency’. The Journal of Value Inquiry 46, no. 1: 13–23.Google Scholar
Hacker-Wright, J. 2013. ‘Human Nature, Virtue, and Rationality’, in Aristotelian Ethics in Contemporary Perspective, Peters, Julia (ed.), pp. 83–96. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hacker-Wright, J. 2018. ‘Introduction: From Natural Goodness to Morality’, in Philippa Foot on Goodness and Virtue, pp. 1–23. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. 2009. Practical Philosophy: Ethics, Society and Culture. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. 2013. ‘Reasoning about the Human Good, and the Role of the Public Philosopher’, in Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis, Keown, J. and George, R. P. (eds.), chapter 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. 1994. Narrative and Natural Law: An Interpretation of Thomist Ethics. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. 2014. Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, E. 1983. ‘Natural Law and Naturalism’. International Philosophical Quarterly 23: 115–24.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. 1975. ‘Natural Law, Tragedy, and Theological Ethics’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 20: 1–19.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. 2000. A Better Hope: Resources for a Church Confronting Capitalism, Democracy, and Postmodernity. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. 2013. Approaching the End: Eschatological Reflections on Church, Politics, and Life. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Hayden, R. 1990. ‘Natural Inclinations and Moral Absolutes: A Mediated Correspondence for Aquinas’. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 64: 130–50.Google Scholar
Hayes, C. 2015. What’s Divine about Divine Law? Early Perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hendry, R. 2006. ‘Is There Downwards Causation in Chemistry?’, in Philosophy of Chemistry: Synthesis of a New Discipline, Baird, D., Scerri, E. and McIntyre, L. (eds.), pp. 173–89. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Hendry, R. 2010. ‘Ontological Reduction and Molecular Structure’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41: 183–91.Google Scholar
Hendry, R. 2017. ‘Prospects for Strong Emergence in Chemistry’, in Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation, Paoletti, M. and Orilia, F. (eds.), pp. 146–63. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herdt, J. 2014. ‘Calvin’s Legacy for Contemporary Reformed Natural Law’. Scottish Journal of Theology 67, no. 4: 414–35.Google Scholar
Hittinger, R. 1987. A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hittinger, R. 1990. ‘Theology and Natural Law’. Communio: International Catholic Review 17: 402–31.Google Scholar
Hittinger, R. 1999. ‘Veritatis Splendor and the Theology of Natural Law’, in Veritatis Splendor and the Renewal of Moral Theology, Di Noia, J. A. and Cessario, Romanus (eds.), pp. 97–128. Chicago: Scepter.Google Scholar
Hittinger, R. 2014. ‘Natural Law and Public Discourse: The Legacies of Joseph Ratzinger’. Loyola University Law Review 60: 241–69.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N. 1913. ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Legal Reasoning’. Yale Law Journal 23, no. 1: 16–59.Google Scholar
Holl, K. 1959. The Cultural Significance of the Reformation. New York: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
Holl, K. 1979. The Reconstruction of Morality. Adams, James Luther and Bense, Walter F. (eds.). Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Press.Google Scholar
Holy See. 1992. Catechism of the Catholic Church. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticane.Google Scholar
Hont, I. 2005. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, C. 2017. ‘Die Metaphysische Grundlegung des Rechts (De Legibus I)’, in Ciceros Staatsphilosophie: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar zu De Re Publica und De Legibus, Höffe, Otfried (ed.), pp. 149–66. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hourani, G. F. 1985. ‘Divine Justice and Human Reason in Mu’tazilite Ethical Theology’, in Ethics in Islam, Hovannisian, Richard G. (ed.), pp. 73–84. Malibu, CA: Undena.Google Scholar
Humphreys, P. 2008. ‘How Properties Emerge’, in Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science, Bedau, M. and Humphreys, P. (eds.), pp. 111–26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, R. 2012. ‘Human Nature and Virtue Ethics’. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 70: 169–88.Google Scholar
International Theological Commission. 2009. The Search for a Universal Ethic: A New Look at the Natural Law. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 1999. ‘Rules and Reasoning in Stoic Ethics’, in Topics in Stoic Philosophy, Ierodiakonou, Katerina (ed.), pp. 95–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and Donini, P. 1999. ‘Stoic Ethics’, in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Algra, Keimpa, Barnes, Jonathan, Mansfeld, Jaap and Schofield, Malcolm (eds.), pp. 675–738. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 2008. The Development of Ethics, vol. II, From Suarez to Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 2012. ‘Obligation, Rightness, and Natural Law: Suárez and Some Critics’, in Interpreting Suárez: Critical Essays, Schwartz, Daniel (ed.), pp. 142–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. 2010. Law, Reason, and Morality in Medieval Jewish Philosophy: Saadia Gaon, Bahya ibn Pakuda, and Moses Maimonides. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jedan, C. 2009. Stoic Virtues: Chrysippus and the Religious Character of Stoic Ethics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jenkins, G. 2013. ‘Citizen Vermigli: The Political Animal in Vermigli’s Commonwealth’. Reformation & Renaissance Review 15, no. 1: 84–98.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. 2015. Knowing the Natural Law: From Precepts and Inclinations to Deriving Oughts. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Jewish Virtual Library. N.d. ‘Babylonian Talmud’. www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/babylonian-talmud-full-text.Google Scholar
Johansen, B. 2003. ‘Apostasy as Objective and Depersonalized Fact: Two Recent Egyptian Court Judgments’. Social Research 70, no. 3: 687–710.Google Scholar
John, Paul II. 1993. ‘Encyclical Letter Veritatis Splendor’. http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_06081993_veritatis-splendor.html.Google Scholar
Kaczor, C. 1997. ‘Exceptionless Norms in Aristotle? Thomas Aquinas and Twentieth-Century Interpreters of the Nicomachean Ethics’. The Thomist 61: 33–62.Google Scholar
Kellner, M. 2006. Maimonides’ Confrontation with Mysticism. Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.Google Scholar
Kerr, F. 2010. ‘Knowing God by Reason Alone: What Vatican I Never Said’. The Dominican Council, pp. 215–28.Google Scholar
Keys, M. 2008. Aristotle, Aquinas, and the Promise of the Common Good. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. 1971. ‘Stoic Intermediates and the End for Man’, in Problems in Stoicism, Long, A. A. (ed.), pp. 150–72. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. 1978. ‘Moral Actions and Rules in Stoicism’, in The Stoics, Rist, John M. (ed.), pp. 247–58. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kilcullen, R. J. 2011. ‘Philosophy between 500 and 1500’, in Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy, Lagerland, H. (ed.), pp. 831–9. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kingdon, R. M. 1980. The Political Thought of Peter Martyr Vermigli: Selected Texts and Commentary. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Klein, J. 2012. ‘Stoic Eudaimonism and the Natural Law Tradition’, in Reason, Religion and Natural Law: Plato to Spinoza, Jacobs, Jonathan (ed.), pp. 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kolb, R. and Wengert, T. J. 2000. The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Koons, R. 2018a. ‘Hylomorphic Escalation: An Aristotelian Interpretation of Quantum Thermodynamics and Chemistry’. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92: 159–78.Google Scholar
Koons, R. 2018b. ‘Knowing Nature: Aristotle, God, and the Quantum’, in Knowing Creation: Perspectives from Theology, Philosophy, and Science, vol. 1, Torrance, A. and McCall, T. (eds.), pp. 215–36. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 2011. ‘Natural Goodness, Rightness, and the Intersubjectivity of Reason: Reply to Arroyo, Cummiskey, Moland, and Bird-Pollan’. Metaphilosophy 42: 381–94.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd edn. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kupczak, J. 2000. The Human Person in the Philosophy of Karol Wojtyła/John Paul II: Destined for Liberty. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Laing, J. A. 1997. ‘Innocence and Consequentialism’, in Human Lives: Critical Essays on Consequentialist Bioethics, Laing, J. A. and Oderberg, D. S. (eds.), pp. 196–224. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Laing, J. A. 2004. ‘Law, Liberalism and the Common Good’, in Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law, Oderberg, D. S. and Chappell, T. D. J. (eds.), pp. 184–216. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Laing, J. A. 2013. ‘Infanticide: A Reply to Giubilini and Minerva’. Journal of Medical Ethics 154: 336–40.Google Scholar
Larmore, C. 2002. ‘Attending to Reasons’, in Reading McDowell: On Mind and World, Nicholas, H. Smith (ed.), chapter 10. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawrence, F. G. 2012. ‘Finnis on Lonergan: A Reflection’. Villanova Law Review 57: 849–72.Google Scholar
Lawrence, G. 2005. ‘Snakes in Paradise: Problems in the Ideal Life’. Southern Journal of Philosophy 43: 126–65.Google Scholar
Lawrence, G. 2017. ‘The Deep and the Shallow’, in Philippa Foot on Goodness and Virtue, Hacker-Wright, John (ed.), pp. 187–255. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lee, P. 1997. ‘Is Thomas’s Natural Law Theory Naturalist?’. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71: 567–87.Google Scholar
Legarre, S. 2017. ‘H.L.A. Hart and the Making of New Natural Law’. Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 8: 82–98.Google Scholar
Levering, M. 2008. Biblical Natural Law: A Theocentric and Teleological Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Library of Congress. ‘Laws Criminalising Apostasy’. www.loc.gov/law/help/apostasy/index.php.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, A. 1975. ‘Does Jewish Tradition Recognize an Ethic Independent of Halakhah?’, in Modern Jewish Ethics: Theory and Practice, Fox, Marvin (ed.), pp. 62–88. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Lisska, A. J. 1996. Aquinas’s Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Little, D. 1968. ‘Calvin and the Prospects for a Christian Theory of Natural Law’, in Norm and Context in Christian Ethics, Ramsey, Paul and Outka, Gene (eds.), pp. 175–97. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Littlejohn, W. B. 2017.The Peril and Promise of Christian Liberty: Richard Hooker, the Puritans, and Protestant Political Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Liu, I. 2017. ‘Elevating Human Being: Towards a New Sort of Naturalism’. Philosophy 92, no. 4: 597–622.Google Scholar
Liu, I. 2018a. ‘The Limits of Aristotelian Naturalism’. The Journal of Value Inquiry 52, no. 3: 269–86.Google Scholar
Liu, I. 2018b. ‘Ethical Pluralism and the Appeal to Human Nature’. European Journal of Philosophy 26, no. 3: 1103–19.Google Scholar
Lombardo, N. E. 2011. The Logic of Desire: Aquinas on Emotion. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Long, S. A. 2004. ‘Natural Law or Autonomous Practical Reason, Problems of the New Natural Law Theory’, in St. Thomas and the Natural Law Tradition: Contemporary Perspectives, Goyette, J., Latkovic, M. and Myers, R. (eds.), pp. 165–93. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Long, S. A. 2013. ‘Fundamental Errors of the New Natural Law Theory’. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13, no. 1: 105–32.Google Scholar
Lott, M. 2012. ‘Moral Virtue as Knowledge of Human Form’. Social Theory and Practice 38, no. 3: 407–31.Google Scholar
Lott, M. 2014. ‘Why Be a Good Human Being? Natural Goodness, Reason, and the Authority of Human Nature’. Philosophy 42: 761–77.Google Scholar
Lott, M. 2015. ‘Justice, Function, and Human Form’, in Normativität des Lebens – Normativität der Vernunft?, Rothhaar, M. and Hähnel, M. (eds.), pp. 75–91. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lott, M. 2017. ‘Aristotelischer Naturalismus und die Autonomie der Ethik’ [Aristotelian Naturalism and the Autonomy of Ethics], in Aristotelischer Naturalismus, Hähnel, M. (ed.), pp. 107–19. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Lücke, H. K. 2016. ‘John Finnis at the University of Adelaide: The Christian Faith Half a Century Ago’. University of Queensland Law Review 35, no. 2: 193–249.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1984. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 2000. ‘Theories of Natural Law in the Cultures of Advanced Modernity’, in Common Truths: New Perspectives on Natural Law, McLean, E. B. (ed.), chapter 5. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 2002. ‘Virtues in Foot and Geach’. Philosophical Quarterly 52, no. 209: 621–31.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 2009. ‘Intractable Moral Disagreements’, in Intractable Disputes about the Natural Law, Cunningham, Lawrence S. (ed.), chapter 1. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 2010. ‘Danish Ethical Demands and French Common Goods: Two Moral Philosophies’. European Journal of Philosophy 18, no. 1: 1–16.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 2016. Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning, and Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1990. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Makdisi, G. 1981. The Rise of Colleges: Institutions of Learning in Islam and the West. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Makdisi, G. 1985. ‘Ethics in Islamic Traditionalist Doctrine’, in Ethics in Islam, Houvannisian, Richard G. (ed.), pp. 47–63. Malibu, CA: Undena.Google Scholar
Marchand, S. L. 2009. German Orientalism in the Age of Empire: Religion, Race and Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marchetti, G. and Marchetti, S. 2017. Facts and Values: The Ethics and Metaphysics of Normativity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maritain, J. 2001. Natural Law: Reflections on Theory and Practice. South Bend, IN: St Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Matava, R. 2011. ‘“Is”, “Ought” and Moral Realism: The Roles of Nature and Experience in Practical Understanding’. Studies in Christian Ethics 24: 311–28.Google Scholar
Mautner, T. 1999 [1989]. ‘Pufendorf and the Correlativity Theory of Rights’, in Grotius, Pufendorf and Modern Natural Law, Haakonssen, Knud (ed.), pp. 159–81. Dartmouth: Ashgate.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1998a. ‘Two Sorts of Naturalism’, in Mind, Value, and Reality, chapter 9. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1998b. Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1995. ‘Two Sorts of Naturalism’, in Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory, Hursthouse, R., Lawrence, G. and Quinn, W. (eds.), pp. 149–80. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McInerny, R. 1980. ‘The Principle of Natural Law’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 1: 1–20.Google Scholar
McInerny, R. 1982. Ethica Thomistica: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
McInerny, R. 1992. Aquinas on Human Action: A Theory of Practice. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
McInerny, R. 1997. Ethica Thomistica: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas. Rev. edn. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
McInerny, R. 1998. ‘Review of Aquinas’s Theory of Natural Law by Anthony Lisska’. The Medieval Review, 10 January. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/tmr/article/view/14562.Google Scholar
McInerny, R. 2000. ‘Grisez and Thomism’, in The Revival of Natural Law: Philosophical, Theological and Ethical Responses to the Finnis-Grisez School, Biggar, N. and Black, R. (eds.), pp. 53–72. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
McNeill, J. T. 1946. ‘Natural Law in the Teaching of the Reformers’. Journal of Religion 26, no. 3: 168–82.Google Scholar
Melina, L. 2001a. ‘Christ and the Dynamism of Action: Outlook and Overview of Christocentrism in Moral Theology’. Communio: International Catholic Review, Spring, 112–40.Google Scholar
Melina, L. 2001b. Sharing in Christ’s Virtues: For a Renewal of Moral Theology in Light of Veritatis Splendor. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1995. ‘Physics as a Virtue’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 11: 1–34.Google Scholar
Milbank, J. and Pabst, A. 2016. The Politics of Virtue: Post-Liberalism and the Human Future. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millum, J. 2006. ‘Natural Goodness and Natural Evil’. Ratio (new series) XIX: 199–213.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. 1993. ‘Seneca on Reason, Rule, and Moral Development’, in Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Brunschwig, Jacques and Nussbaum, Martha C. (eds.), pp. 285–313. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. 1994. ‘Natural Law and Natural Rights in Post-Aristotelian Philosophy: The Stoics and Their Critics’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt, Part II, Vols. 36–7, Haase, Wolfgang (ed.), pp. 4812–50. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moore, J. and Silverthorne, M. 1995. ‘Protestant Theologies, Limited Sovereignties: Natural Law and Conditions of Union in the German Empire, the Netherlands and Great Britain’, in A Union for Empire: Political Thought and the British Union of 1707, Robertson, John (ed.), chapter 7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. M. 1994. ‘Essences, Powers, and Generic Propositions’, in Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Scaltsas, T., Charles, D. and Gill, M. L. (eds.), pp. 229–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, S. 2009. ‘Causal Powers and Capacities’, in The Oxford Handbook of Causation, Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C. and Menzies, P. (eds.), pp. 265–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Munoz, P. 2013. Religious Liberty and the American Supreme Court. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. C. 2001. Natural Law and Practical Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. C. 2008 [2002]. ‘The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/natural-law-ethics.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. 2007. ‘Baruch Spinoza and the Naturalization of Judaism’, in The Cambridge Companion to Modern Jewish Philosophy, Morgan, Michael L. and Gordon, Peter Eli (eds.), pp. 14–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 2010. The History of Islamic Theology: From Muhammad to the Present. Princeton, NJ: Markus Weiner.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nassery, I., Ahmed, R. and Tatari, M. 2018. The Objectives of Islamic Law: The Promises and Challenges of Maqasid al-Sharia. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Newman, L. E. 1998. Past Imperatives: Studies in the History and Theory of Jewish Ethics. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. 1959. ‘An Examination of the Thomistic Theory of Natural Moral Law’. Natural Law Forum 1: 44–71.Google Scholar
Novak, L., Novotny, D., Sousedik, P. and Svoboda, D. 2012. Metaphysics: Aristotelian, Scholastic, Analytic. Frankfurt: Ontos.Google Scholar
Novotny, D. and Novak, L. 2014. Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives in Metaphysics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. B. and Koons, R. C. 2012. ‘Objects of Intention: A Hylomorphic Critique of the New Natural Law Theory’. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86, no. 4: 655–703.Google Scholar
Oderberg, D. S. 2000. Moral Theory: A Non-Consequentialist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oderberg, D. S. 2004. ‘The Structure and Content of the Good’, in Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law, Oderberg, D. S. and Chappell, T. (eds.), chapter 6. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Oderberg, D. S. 2010. ‘The Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Law’, in Natural Moral Law in Contemporary Society, Zaborowski, H. (ed.), pp. 44–75. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Oderberg, D. S. 2017. ‘Finality Revived: Powers and Intentionality’. Synthese 194: 2387–425.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, J. L. 1991. Theology of Law and Authority in the English Reformation. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Okasha, S. 2002. ‘Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism’. Synthese 131: 191–213.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, K. 2010 [1977]. ‘The Two Levels in Natural Law Thinking’, Thomas Mautner (ed.). Jurisprudence 1, no. 2: 197–224.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, J. 2018. ‘Grotius and the Early Modern Tradition’, in The Cambridge Handbook of the Just War, May, Larry (ed.), pp. 33–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, J. 2019. ‘Grotius on Natural Law and Supererogation’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 57, no. 3: 439–465.Google Scholar
Osborne, T. M. 2005. Love of Self and Love of God in Thirteenth-Century Ethics. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, D. 2004. ‘Hisba Law and Freedom of Expression in Islam: Two Case Studies of Prosecution in Contemporary Egypt’. Journal of Mediterranean Studies 14, no. 1: 213–35.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1960. ‘Logic and Metaphysics in Some Earlier Works of Aristotle’, in Plato and Aristotle in the Mid-Fourth Century, During, I. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.), pp. 163–90. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Pakaluk, M. 2001. ‘Is the Common Good of Political Society Limited and Instrumental?’ Review of Metaphysics 55, no. 1: 57–94.Google Scholar
Pakaluk, M. 2002. ‘Natural Law and Civil Society’, in Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society, Chambers, S. and Kymlicka, W. (eds.), pp. 131–50. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pakaluk, M. 2018. ‘Natural Inclinations in Aquinas’s Account of Natural Law’, in Natural Law Today: The Present State of the Perennial Philosophy, Wolfe, C. and Brust, S. (eds.), pp. 19–32. Lanham, MD: Lexington Press.Google Scholar
Palladini, F. 2008. ‘Pufendorf Disciple of Hobbes: The Nature of Man and the State of Nature: The Doctrine of Socialitas’. History of European Ideas 34, no. 1: 26–60.Google Scholar
Pinckaers, S.-T. 1994. ‘An Encyclical of the Future: Veritatis Splendor’, in Veritatis Splendor and the Renewal of Moral Theology, Di Noia, J. A. and Cessario, Romanus (eds.), pp. 11–72. Princeton, NJ: Scepter.Google Scholar
Pinckaers, S.-T. 2001. Morality: The Catholic View. South Bend, IN: St Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Place, U. T. 1996. ‘Dispositions as Intentional States’, Armstrong, D. M., Martin, C. B. and Place, U. T. (eds.), in Dispositions: A Debate, Crane, T. (ed.), pp. 19–32. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Porter, J. 1999. Natural and Divine Law: Reclaiming the Tradition for Christian Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Porter, J. 2005. Nature as Reason: A Thomistic Theory of the Natural Law. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 2004a. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, J. 2005. ‘The Renewal of Moral Theology: Vatican II and Veritatis Splendor’. Communio: International Catholic Review 32, no. 2: 357–68.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, J. 2011. Dogma and Preaching: Applying Christian Doctrine to Daily Life. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Rhonheimer, M. 2008. ‘Practical Reason and the “Naturally Rational”: On the Doctrine of the Natural Law as a Principle of Praxis in Thomas Aquinas’, in The Perspective of the Acting Person: Essays in the Renewal of Thomistic Moral Philosophy, pp. 95–128. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. S. 2004. ‘Incommensurability and Basic Goods: A Tension in the New Natural Law Theory’, in Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law, Oderberg, D. S. and Chappell, T. (eds.), chapter 4. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. 1952. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, S. 2014. Common Sense: A Political History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rothbard, M. 1989. ‘The Hermeneutical Invasion of Philosophy and Economics’. Review of Austrian Economics 3: 45–9.Google Scholar
Rousselot, P. 1908. Pour l’Histoire du Problème de l’Amour au Moyen Age. Münster: Aschendorffsche.Google Scholar
Rudavsky, T. M. 2018. Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages: Science, Rationalism and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, D. 2010. ‘Spinoza’s Conception of Law: Metaphysics and Ethics’, in Spinoza’s Theological Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, Melamed, Y. and Rosenthal, Michael A. (eds.), pp. 143–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rynhold, D. 2009. An Introduction to Medieval Jewish Philosophy. London: I. B. Taurus.Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, K. 1995. The Morality of Fallen Man: Samuel Pufendorf on Natural Law. Helsinki: SHS.Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, K. 2006. ‘Liberty and Natural Rights in Pufendorf’s Natural Law Theory’, in Transformations in Medieval and Early-Modern Rights Discourse, Mäkinen, Virpi and Korkman, Petter (eds.), pp. 225–56. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Saccenti, R. 2016. Debating Medieval Natural Law: A Survey. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Sadler, G. B. 2011. Reason Fulfilled by Revelation: The 1930s Christian Philosophy Debates in France. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, D. 2002. ‘Within the Orbit of This Life – Samuel Pufendorf and the Autonomy of Law’. Cardozo Law Review 23, no. 6: 2173–98.Google Scholar
Scerri, E. 1994. ‘Has Chemistry Been at Least Approximately Reduced to Quantum Mechanics?’. Philosophy of Science Association 1: 160–70.Google Scholar
Scerri, E. 2016. ‘The Changing Views of a Philosopher of Chemistry on the Question of Reduction’, in Essays in the Philosophy of Chemistry, Scerri, E. and Fisher, G. (eds.), pp. 125–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schabas, M. 2007. The Natural Origins of Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schall, J. V. 1998. Jacques Maritain: The Philosopher in Society. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1987. ‘Pufendorf’s Place in the History of Ethics’. Synthese 72, no. 1: 123–55.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1998. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 2010. Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1962. ‘Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man’, in Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, Colodny, R. (ed.), pp. 35–78. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2004. ‘Capability and Well-Being’, in The Quality of Life, Nussbaum, Martha and Sen, Amartya (eds.), pp. 30–53. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shany, Y. 2005. ‘Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?’ European Journal of International Law 16, no. 5: 907–40.Google Scholar
Sigmund, P. 1993. ‘Law and Politics’, in The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, Kretzmann, N. and Stump, E. (eds.), pp. XX–XX. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. E. 2002. ‘Grotius and Pufendorf’, in A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, Nadler, Steven (ed.), pp. 210–24. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Simon, Y. 1951. Philosophy of Democratic Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Y. 1965. The Tradition of Natural Law: A Philosopher’s Reflections. Vukan, Kuic (ed.). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, W., Koons, R. and Teh, N. 2018. Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sklar, L. 1993. Physics and Chance: Philosophical Issues in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1956. ‘Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism’. The Philosophical Quarterly 6: 345–54.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1967. ‘Utilitarianism’, in Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edwards, Paul (ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 2011. ‘What the Old Law Reveals about the Natural Law According to Thomas Aquinas’. The Thomist 75: 95–139.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, R. 2004. ‘What Is Natural Law? Human Purposes and Natural Ends’. The Thomist 68: 507–29.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, R. 2006. Christian Faith and Human Understanding. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Spaemann, R. 1996. Personen: Versuche über den Unterschied zwischen ‘Etwas’ und ‘Jemand’. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. [English translation by Oliver O’Donovan (2006), published as Persons: The Difference between ‘Someone’ and ‘Something’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Google Scholar
Spielmann, D. 2014. ‘Whither the Margin of Appreciation?’ Current Legal Problems 67, no. 1: 49–65.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, D. C. 1995. ‘Calvin and the Natural Knowledge of God’, in Calvin in Context, chapter 2. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, G. 1953. ‘The Disinterested Love of God According to Saint Thomas and Some of His Modern Interpreters’. The Thomist 16: 307–33, 497–541.Google Scholar
St Leger, J. 1962. The ‘Etiamsi Daremus’ of Hugo Grotius: A Study in the Origins of International Law. Rome: Pontificum Athenaeum Internationale ‘Angelicum’.Google Scholar
Stoner, J. Jr. 2007. ‘Was Thomas Aquinas a Republican?’ Paper delivered at a panel on ‘Religion and Politics’ at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. 2015. Roman Law in the State of Nature: The Classical Foundations of Hugo Grotius’s Natural Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. 1965. Natural Right and History. Rev. edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Street, S. 2006. ‘A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value’. Philosophical Studies 127, no. 1: 109–66.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1987. ‘Origins of the Concept of Natural Law’, in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 2, pp. 79–94. [Reprinted 1996 in her Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, pp. 209–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1991. ‘Following Nature: A Study in Stoic Ethics’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 9: 1–73. [Reprinted 1996 in her Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, pp. 221–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Google Scholar
Sturm, D. 1965. ‘Naturalism, Historicism, and Christian Ethics: Toward a Christian Doctrine of Natural Law’, in New Theology, vol. 2, Marty, Martin and Peerman, Dean (eds.), pp. 77–96. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sullivan, E. 2014. ‘Natural Self-Transcending Love According to Thomas Aquinas’. Nova et Vetera 12: 913–46.Google Scholar
Tahko, T. 2012. Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teichmann, R. 2011. Nature, Reason, and the Good Life: Ethics for Human Beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teyssier, J., Saenko, S. V., van der Marel, D. and Milinkovitch, M. C. 2015. ‘Photonic Crystals Cause Active Colour Change in Chameleons’. Nature Communications 6: 6368. www.nature.com/articles/ncomms7368.Google Scholar
Thom, J. C. 2005. Cleanthes’ Hymn to Zeus: Text, Translation and Commentary. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. 1995. ‘The Representation of Life’, in Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory – Essays in Honour of Philippa Foot, Hursthouse, R., Lawrence, G. and Quinn, W. (eds.), chapter 10. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. 2004. ‘Apprehending Human Form’, in Modern Moral Philosophy, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 54, O’Hear, A. (ed.), pp. 47–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–74.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. 2008. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, C. 2012. ‘The New Natural Law Theory’. www.nlnrac.org/contemporary/new-natural-law-theory.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, C. 2018a. ‘A Philosophical Case against Capital Punishment’. www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/11/20393.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, C. 2018b. ‘Aquinas’s Four Orders, Normativity, and Human Nature’. The Journal of Value Inquiry 52, no. 3: 243–56.Google Scholar
Toner, C. 2008. ‘Sorts of Naturalism: Requirements for a Successful Theory’. Metaphilosophy 39, no. 2: 220–50.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. 1987. ‘The “Modern” Theory of Natural Law’, in The Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe, Pagden, Anthony (ed.), pp. 99–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. 1994. ‘Zeno’s Republic and the Origins of Natural Law’, in The Socratic Movement, Vander Waerdt, Paul A. (ed.), pp. 272–308. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Van Drunen, D. 2010. Natural Law and the Two Kingdoms: A Study in the Development of Reformed Social Thought. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Van Zile, M. 2017. ‘The Sons of Noah and the Sons of Abraham: The Origins of Noahide Law’. Journal for the Study of Judaism 48: 1–32.Google Scholar
Vatican Council II. 1988. Vatican Council II: The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents. Rev. edn. Flannery, A. (ed.). Northport, NY: Costello.Google Scholar
Vermigli, Peter Martyr. 1583. Common Places. Marten, Anthonie (trans.). London: Henry Denham and Henry Middleton.Google Scholar
Vogler, C. 2013. ‘Natural Virtue and Proper Upbringing’, in Aristotelian Ethics in Contemporary Perspective, Peters, J. (ed.), pp. 145–57. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. 2002. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke’s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, G. 1971. ‘The Natural Law and Stoicism’, in Problems in Stoicism, Long, A. A. (ed.), pp. 216–38. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Watt, W. M. 1998. The Formative Period of Islamic Thought. Rev. edn. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Weinreb, L. L. 1987. Natural Law and Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, M., Needham, P. and Hendry, R. 2011. ‘Philosophy of Chemistry’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chemistry.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1997. Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. 2008. ‘From Limits to Laws: The Construction of the Nomological Image of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy’, in Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe: Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy, Daston, Lorraine and Stolleis, Michael (eds.), pp. 13–28. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Witte, J. 2002. Law and Protestantism: The Legal Teachings of the Lutheran Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Witte, J. 2006. God’s Joust, God’s Justice: Law and Religion in the Western Tradition. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Witte, J. 2007. The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion, and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Witte, J. and Kingdon, R. M. 2005. Sex, Marriage, and Family in John Calvin’s Geneva, vol. 1, Courtship, Engagement, and Marriage. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Anscombe, G. E. M. (trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woodcock, S. 2015. ‘Neo-Aristotelian Naturalism and the Indeterminacy Objection’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23, no. 1: 23–41.Google Scholar
Woodford, P. 2016. ‘Neo-Darwinists and Neo-Aristotelians: How to Talk about Natural Purpose’. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 38, no.4: 1–23.Google Scholar