Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:48:57.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Race and ethnicity in white women’s modernist literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2010

Maren Tova Linett
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

“The contemplation of this black presence is central to any understanding of our national literature and should not be permitted to hover at the margins of the literary imagination.” / As Toni Morrison and postcolonial critics have argued, the “black presence” in America, the Jewish presence in Europe, and colonialism and empire in Britain, are central to the literary imagination of Anglo-American modernism, “are indeed constitutive of it.” If modernism, broadly defined, involves a critical relation to “Modernity,” as Enlightenment, reason, and progress, it also calls into question any simple essentialist view of identity. Racial, religious, and ethnic differences (as defined by the racialized discourses of the period 1900-40) are thus used to represent the divisions of the modernist subject. White women's modernist writing suggests different degrees of ambivalence, complicity, and opposition to the dominant discourses on race and ethnicity. All the terms of this chapter's title deserve discussion and invite reflection, often needing to be understood in relation to plural others rather than as halves of binary opposites. For although nationality is a political category, race a genetic, and ethnicity a cultural category, for modernist writing the meanings of “race” and “ethnicity” are historically shifting and often overlapping, shaped by nineteenth-century eugenicist and social Darwinian theories and by the historical and political events of the period. In what follows, the term “modernist” is understood in an inclusive sense. Edward Said claims that Conrad, Forster, and others took narrative form from “the triumphalist experience of imperialism,” creating discontinuity, self-referentiality, and a corrosive irony “whose formal patterns we have come to recognise as the hallmarks of modernist culture.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×