Jung and religion

doi:10.1017/CCOL0521473098.016

15 - Jung and religion

the opposing Self

from Part 3 - Analytical psychology in society

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2006

Ann Ulanov

Edited by

Polly Young-Eisendrath and

Terence Dawson

Show author details

Polly Young-Eisendrath: Affiliation:
University of Vermont
Terence Dawson: Affiliation:
National University of Singapore

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Why Jung on religion?

How are we to respond to the twentieth-century phenomenon, which Jung noted with such alarm: that the collective containers of religious symbolism are weak, if not altogether gone? For centuries the symbols, rituals, and dogmas of religions, East and West, gathered the psychic energy of individuals and nations alike into traditions that bore witness to life's meaning and acted as underground springs nourishing different civilizations. Jung saw our century as one no longer in daily touch with the meaning of being which lies at the center of life. We have plumbed the resources of consciousness as best we could in our efforts to fathom and to control the contradictions and paradoxes of spirit that have remained to us, but we have lost touch with our roots and the symbolic life that they support and nourish.

Where are we now? What has happened to all the energy that is no longer channeled into religious containers? According to Jung, it has poured back into the human psyche with disastrous effect. Deprived of its proper outlet in religious experience, it assumes negative forms. For the individual, this misplaced energy can lead to neurosis or psychosis; in society, it can lead to all kinds of horrors, genocide, holocaust, and gulags. It can give rise to ideologies whose potential good is soured by the bullying of adherents into frightened compliance. Afraid of being swamped, we erect barriers of rigid rules and compartments against the negative barrages of psychic energy, creating religious, political, and sexual fundamentalisms that trap us in unyielding certainties.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Companion to Jung , pp. 296 - 313

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521473098.016 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Jung, C. G.(1932b). “Picasso.” CW 15, pp. –141.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G.(1934). “A Study in the Process of Individuation.” CW 9.i, pp. –354.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G.(1937). Psychology and Religion. 11, p. –105.

Jung, C. G.(1952a). “Reply to Martin Buber.” CW 18, pp. –670.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G.(1952b). “Answer to Job.” CW 11, pp. –470.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G.(1954). “Psychological commentary on The Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation.” CW 11, pp. –508. (Written in 1939).Google Scholar

Jung, C. G.(1956). 5.

Jung, C. G.(1961). Memories, Dreams, Reflections. Recorded and edited by Aniela Jaffé. Tr. , R. and Winston, C.. Revised edition. New York, NY: Random House/Vintage, 1989.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G.(1967). 13.

Jung, C. G.(1968). , 2nd ed. 12.

Jung, C. G.(1970). , 2nd ed. 14.

Jung, C. G.(1973/76). Letters. Ed. Adler, G. and Jaffé, A., tr. Hull, R. F. C., 2 vols. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Kerényi, C. (1960). Eleusis: Archetypal Image of Mother and Daughter. Tr. Manheim, R.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Kirsch, T. (2000). The Jungians: A Comparative and Historical Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Knapp, B. L. (1957). Louis Jouvet, Man of the Theatre. Foreword by Michael Redgrave. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Knapp, B. L.(1969). Antonin Artaud: Man of Vision. Preface by Anaïs Nin. New York, NY: David Lewis.Google Scholar

Knapp, B. L.(1984). A Jungian Approach to Literature. Carbondale and Edwardsville, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Knapp, B. L.(1985). Archetype, Architecture, and the Writer. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Knapp, B. L.(1988). Music, Archetype, and the Writer: A Jungian View. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Knapp, B. L.(1989). Machine, Metaphor, and the Writer: A Jungian View. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Knapp, B. L.(1991a). The Brontës: Branwell, Anne, Emily, Charlotte. Literature and Life. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar

Knapp, B. L.(1991b). Exile and the Writer: Exoteric and Esoteric Experiences: A Jungian Approach. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Knapp, B. L.(1998). Women, Myth, and the Feminine Principle. New York, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Knapp, B. L.(2003). French Fairy Tales: A Jungian Approach. SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis and Culture. New York, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Knellwolf, C. and Norris, C. (2007). The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: Volume 9: . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lacan, J. (1966). Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Tr. Fink, B., with Fink, H. and Grigg, R.. New York, NY: W.W. Norton, 2006.Google Scholar

Leavis, F. R. (1932). New Bearings in English Poetry: A Study of the Contemporary Situation. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar

Leavis, F. R.(1948). The Great Tradition. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar

Lotringer, S. (1977). “The Fiction of Analysis”. Semiotext(e), 2, pp. –189.Google Scholar

Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Tr. Bennington, G. and Massumi, B.. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Macherey, P. (1966). A Theory of Literary Production. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Martin, P. W. (1955). Experiment in Depth: A Study of the Work of Jung, Eliot and Toynbee. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Meurs, J. Van, with Kidd, J. (1988). Jungian Literary Criticism: 1920–1980: An Annotated, Critical Bibliography of Works in English. Metuchen, NJ and London: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar

Miller, F. (Miss). . (1906). “Some Instances of Subconscious Creative Imagination.” In Jung, 1956, pp. 445–462.

Muller, J. P. and Richardson, W. J. (1982). Lacan and Language. A Reader’s Guide to Écrits. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Muller, J. P. and Richardson, W. J.(1988). The Purloined Poe: Lacan, Derrida, and Psychoanalytic Reading. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, M. (2004). “A Bibliography of Jungian and Post-Jungian Literary Criticism: 1980–2000,” in Post-Jungian Criticism: Theory and Practice, ed. Baumlin, J. S., Baumlin, T. F., and Jensen, G. H.. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 263–295.Google Scholar

Odajnyk, V. W. (1976). Jung and Politics: The Political and Social Ideas of C. G. Jung. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Phillipson, M. H. (1963). An Outline of Jungian Aesthetics. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass.: Sigo, 1994.Google Scholar

Rank, O. (1907). The Artist. Expanded and revised as , tr. Atkinson, C. F.. New York, NY: W. W. Norton, 1989.Google Scholar

Rank, O.(1909). The Myth of the Birth of the Hero. Tr. Robbins, F. and Jeliffe, S. E.. New York, NY: Nervous & Mental Disease Pub. Co., 1914.Google Scholar

Riklin, F. (1908). “Wishfulfillment and Symbolism in Fairy Tales.” Tr. White, W. A.. New York, NY: Nervous & Mental Disease Pub. Co., 1915.Google Scholar

Rowland, S. (1999). C. G. Jung and Literary Theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rowland, S.(2002). Jung: A Feminist Revision. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Rowland, S.(2005). Jung as a Writer. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Samuels, A. (1985). Jung and the Post-Jungians. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Samuels, A.(1993). The Political Psyche. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Samuels, A.(2001). Politics on the Couch: Citizenship and the Internal Life. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar

Segal, R. (1999). Theorizing about Myth. Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Segal, R.(2004). Myth: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Singer, J. (1970). The Unholy Bible. New York, NY: G. P. Putnam’s.Google Scholar

Singer, T. and Kimbles, S. L. (eds) (2004). The Cultural Complex: Contemporary Jungian Perspectives on Psyche and Society. Hove, East Sussex: Brunner–Routledge.

Snowden, R. (2005). Jung. Teach Yourself. London: Hodder, 2005.Google Scholar

Sugg, R. P., ed. (1992). Jungian Literary Criticism. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.

Tacey, D. (1988). Patrick White: Fiction and the Unconscious. Melbourne and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tacey, D.(2006). How to Read Jung. London: Granta.Google Scholar

Ward, T. (1961). The Capsule of the Mind: Chapters in the Life of Emily Dickinson. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, R. (1958). Culture and Society, 1780–1950. New York, NY: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar

Williams, R.(1977). Marxism and Literature. London: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Wright, E. (1984). Psychoanalytic Criticism: Theory in Practice. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Alschuler, L. (1992). “Oppression and Liberation: A Psycho-Political Analysis According to Freire and Jung.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 32/2, pp. –31.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alschuler, L.(1995). “Re-psychling: the Archetypal Image of Asklepios, the Wounded Healer.” International Journal of Comparative Religion and Philosophy, 1/2.Google Scholar

Alschuler, L.(1996). “Oppression, Liberation, and Narcissism: A Jungian Psycho-political Analysis of the Ideas of Albert Memmi.” Alternatives, 21/4.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alschuler, L.(2007). The Psychopolitics of Liberation: Political Consciousness from a Jungian Perspective. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. (1989). Power and Politics: The Psychology of Soviet-American Partnership. Boston, Mass.: Shambala Publications.Google Scholar

D’Lugin, V. (1981). “C. G. Jung and Political Theory: An Examination of the Ideas of Carl Gustav Jung showing their Relationship to Political Theory.” Doctoral thesis. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms.

Edinger, E. (1972). Ego and Archetype: Individuation and the Religious Function of the Psyche. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar

Franz, M.-L. von (1976). “Preface.” In Odajnyk, V. W., Jung and Politics. New York, NY: New York University Press, pp. xiii–xv.Google Scholar

Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar

Freire, P.(1974). Education for Critical Consciousness. New York, NY: Seabury Press.Google Scholar

Gambini, R. (1997). “The Soul of Underdevelopment: The Case of Brazil.” In Matoon, M. (ed.), Zurich 95: Open Questions in Analytical Psychology. Einsiedeln: Daimon Verlag, pp. 139–148.Google Scholar

Gambini, R.(2000). Indian Mirror: The Making of the Brazilian Soul. Sao Paulo: Axis Mundi Editora.Google Scholar

Jacobi, J. (1967). The Way of Individuation. New York, NY: Meridian.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G. (1934). “A Review of Complex Theory.” CW 8, 1966, pp. –104.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G.(1937). “The Realities of Practical Psychotherapy.” CW 16, pp. –338.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G.(1939). “Conscious, Unconscious, and Individuation.” CW 9.i, 1980, pp. –289.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G.(1946). “Preface and Epilogue” to Essays on Contemporary Events. CW 10, 1966.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G.(1949) Foreword to Erich Neumann, Depth Psychology and a New Ethic. CW 18, pp. –622.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G.(1953). Two Essays on Analytical Psychology. CW 7, 1972.

Jung, C. G.(1957). The Undiscovered Self. CW 10, 1990.

Mindell, A. (1995). Sitting in the Fire: Large Group Transformation Using Conflict and Diversity. Portland, Ore.: Lao Tse Press.Google Scholar

Neumann, E. (1966). “Narcissism, Normal Self-formation, and the Primary Relation to the Mother.” Spring, pp. –106.Google Scholar

Odajnyk, V. W. (1976). Jung and Politics: The Political and Social Ideas of C. G. Jung. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Perry, J. W. (1970) “Emotions and Object Relations.” Journal of Analytical Psychology, 15/1, pp. –12.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H. and Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Samuels, A. (1986). Jung and the Post-Jungians. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Samuels, A.(1993). The Political Psyche. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Samuels, A.(2001). Politics on the Couch: Citizenship and the Internal Life. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar

Sandner, D. F. and Beebe, J. (1984). “Psychopathology and Analysis.” In Stein, M. (ed.), Jungian Analysis. Boulder, Colo. and London: Shambala, pp. 294–334.Google Scholar

Singer, T. and Kimbles, S. L. (eds.). (2004). The Cultural Complex: Contemporary Jungian Perspectives on Psyche and Society. New York, NY: Brunner–Routledge.

Smith, W. A. (1976). The Meaning of Conscientização: the Goal of Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy. Amherst, Mass.: Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Steiner, M. (1983). “The Search for Order in a Disorderly World: Worldviews and Prescriptive Decision Paradigms.” International Organization, 37/3, pp. –414.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stevens, A. (1989). The Roots of War: A Jungian Perspective. New York, NY: Paragon House.Google Scholar

Stewart, L. H. (1992). The Changemakers: A Depth Psychological Study of the Individual, Family and Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Whitmont, E. C. (1978). The Symbolic Quest: Basic Concepts of Analytical Psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar