Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Notes on contributors
- Acronyms and abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I All kinds of everyone
- 1 ‘Framing the project’ of international human rights law: reflections on the dysfunctional ‘family’ of the Universal Declaration
- 2 Restoring the ‘human’ in ‘human rights’: personhood and doctrinal innovation in the UN disability convention
- 3 The poverty of (rights) jurisprudence
- Part II Interconnections
- Part III Platforms
- Part IV Pressures
- Index
- References
2 - Restoring the ‘human’ in ‘human rights’: personhood and doctrinal innovation in the UN disability convention
from Part I - All kinds of everyone
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Notes on contributors
- Acronyms and abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I All kinds of everyone
- 1 ‘Framing the project’ of international human rights law: reflections on the dysfunctional ‘family’ of the Universal Declaration
- 2 Restoring the ‘human’ in ‘human rights’: personhood and doctrinal innovation in the UN disability convention
- 3 The poverty of (rights) jurisprudence
- Part II Interconnections
- Part III Platforms
- Part IV Pressures
- Index
- References
Summary
‘What is needed nowadays is that as against an abstract and unreal theory of State omnipotence on the one hand, and an atomistic and artificial view of individual independence on the other, the facts of the world with its innumerable bonds of association and the naturalness of social authority should be generally recognized, and become the basis of our laws, as it is of our life.’
Recovering the human
‘Human rights’ – here are two words expressing two different normative domains. Most simply assume that the two are mutually reinforcing, mutually implicated by each other, coterminous and coeval. Everywhere in the world, first-year law students are routinely told that we enjoy human rights simply because we are human. The question of whether there are any essential criteria of being human or of ‘personhood’ and, if so, what they are, is left dangling as if solved by the conjuncture of ‘human’ with ‘rights’. That is, rights-talk tends to cloud our view of what it means to be human. And rights tend to impute a certain view of humanity – one that is not necessarily tied to observable reality. Another result is the absence of any clear toeholds in the slippery debate about whether there are any non-human ‘persons’ (e.g. animals or even the earth) and, if so, whether they are the proper subject of rights.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law , pp. 36 - 55Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012
References
and , ‘A New Paradigm for Protecting Autonomy and the Right to Legal Capacity’, Paper prepared for the Law Commission of Ontario (October 2010) 7–8,
Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy, and (eds.) (Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell 2010)
, ‘Legal Capacity in the Disability Rights Convention: Stranglehold of the Past or Lodestar for the Future?’ (2006–7) 34 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce429–62 at 431–2Google Scholar
Essential Principles: Irish Legal Capacity Law, Amnesty International Ireland, the Centre for Disability Law and Policy (Galway et al. : NUI 2012)
European Yearbook of Disability Law, Vol. 1, and (eds.) (Oxford: Intersentia 2009)
, From Rhetoric to Action: Implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (Cambridge University Press 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Personhood and Legal Capacity: Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift of Article 12 CRPD’, Paper presented at the Conference on Disability and Legal Capacity under the CRPD (Boston, MA: Harvard Law School) 20 February 2010
‘Rethinking Personhood: New Directions in Legal Capacity Law and Policy’, Lecture (Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 29 April 2011)
Report on Hearings in Relation to the Scheme of the Mental Capacity Bill, Houses of the Oireachtas, Joint Committee on Justice, Defence, and Equality (May 2012) (31/JDAE/005),
(Spring 2007) 34 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 2
Thematic Study on the Structure and Role of National Mechanisms for the Implementation and Monitoring of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Human Rights Council, 13th session (A/HRC/13/29) (22 December 2009)
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – European and Scandinavian Perspectives, and (eds.) (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff 2009)
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Multidisciplinary Perspectives, and (eds.) (Helsinki: The Centre for Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Finland (VIKE) 2009)
Who Gets to Decide? Right to Legal Capacity for Persons with Intellectual and Psychosocial Disabilities, Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights (20 February 2012)
, Political Thought from Gerson to Grotius 1414–1625: Seven Studies (New York: Harper Torchbooks 1960) 206Google Scholar
, ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’ (1955) 69 Quarterly Journal of Economics9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘A Future of Multidimensional Disadvantage Equality?’, in and (eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff 2009) 41, 47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Unborn Child and Abortion Under the Draft Convention on the Rights of the Child’ (1990) 12 Human Rights Quarterly156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, The Disabled Persons and the International Organizations (Rome: International Documentation Ent. 1981)Google Scholar
, On Autonomy: Legal and Psychological Perspectives (1992) 37 Villanova Law Review1705, 1755–68Google ScholarPubMed
, ‘Legal Capacity in the Disability Rights Convention: Stranglehold of the Past or Lodestar for the Future?’ (2006–7) 34 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce429, 431–2Google Scholar
Mental Disability Advocacy Centre (MDAC), Guardianship and Human Rights in Bulgaria (2008)
and , ‘The Moral Authority for Change: Human Rights Values and the Worldwide Process of Disability Reform’, in et al. (eds.), Human Rights and Disability: The Current Use and Future Potential of United Nations Human Rights Instruments in the Context of Disability (Geneva: OHCHR 2002) 9Google Scholar
UN OHCHR, Thematic Study on Enhancing Awareness and Understanding of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, para. 45, UN Doc. A/HRC/10/48 (26 January 2009)
Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 35 of the Convention: Concluding Observations, Tunisia, Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), 5th Sess., UN Doc. CRPD/C/TUN/CO/1 (11–15 April 2011) 4
Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 35 of the Convention: Concluding Observations, Spain, Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), 6th Sess., UN Doc. CRPD/C/ESP/CO/1 (19–23 September 2011) 5
Glor v. Switzerland, 13444/04 ECtHR (Sect. 1) (2009)
Stanev v. Bulgaria, 36760/06 ECtHR [GC], para. 72 (2012)
, Who Gets to Decide? Right to Legal Capacity for Persons with Intellectual and Psychosocial Disabilities, Issue Paper commissioned by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Comm. DH/Issue Paper (2012) 2 (20 February 2012)
, Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain (New York: Knopf Doubleday 2010)Google Scholar
and (eds.), European Union Non-Discrimination Law and Intersectionality: Investigating the Triangle of Racial, Gender and Disability Discrimination (Farnham: Ashgate 2011)
, Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy and Policy (PrincetonUniversity Press 1997) 150Google Scholar
, ‘A Future of Multidimensional Disadvantage Equality?’, in and (eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff 2009) 41, 47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19
- Cited by