Behrendt, Stephen C. (ed.) Approaches to Teaching Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. New York: MLA, 1990.Google Scholar

Botting, Fred (ed.) Frankenstein: Contemporary Critical Essays. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995).Google Scholar

Botting, Fred ‘Reflections of Excess: Frankenstein, the French Revolution and Monstrosity’ in Reflections of Revolution: Images of Romanticism, ed. Yarrington, Alison and Everest, Kelvin. London: Routledge, 1993. 26–38.Google Scholar

Butler, Marilyn. ‘The First Frankenstein and Radical Science’. Times Literary Supplement, 9 (April 1993), 12–14.Google Scholar

Pamela, Clemit. The Godwinian Novel: The Rational Fictions of Godwin, Brockden Brown, Mary Shelley. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Collings, David. Monstrous Society: Reciprocity, Discipline, and the Political Uncanny, c. 1780–1848. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Craciun, Adriana. ‘Writing the Disaster: Franklin and Frankenstein’. Nineteenth-Century Literature 65 (2011) 433–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigante, Denise. ‘Facing the Ugly: The Case of Frankenstein’. ELH, 67 (2000), 565–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glut, Donald F. The Frankenstein Catalog: Being a Comprehensive Listing of Novels, Translations, Adaptations, Stories, Critical Works, Popular Articles, Series, Fumetti, Verse, Stage Plays, Films…Featuring Frankenstein's Monster and/or Descended from Mary Shelley's Novel. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 1984.Google Scholar

Hill, Jen. White Horizon: The Arctic in the Nineteenth-Century British Imagination. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Hill-Miller, Katherine C. ‘My Hideous Progeny’: Mary Shelley, William Godwin, and the Father-Daughter Relationship. London: Associated University Presses, 1995.Google Scholar

Hogle, Jerrold E. ‘Frankenstein as Neo-Gothic: From the Ghost of the Counterfeit to the Monster of Abjection’ in Romanticism, History and the Possibilities of Genre: Re-forming Literature 1789–1837, ed. Rajan, Tilottama and Wright, Julia. Cambridge University Press, 1998. 176–210.Google Scholar

Levine, George, and Knoepfelmacher, U. C. (eds.) The Endurance of Frankenstein: Essays on Mary Shelley's Novel. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyles, W. H. Mary Shelley: An Annotated Bibliography. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1975.Google Scholar

Marshall, David. The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau, and Mary Shelley. University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Newlyn, Lucy. Paradise Lost and the Romantic Reader. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Richard, Jessica. ‘“A Paradise of My Own Creation”: Frankenstein and the Improbable Romance of Polar Exploration’. Nineteenth-Century Contexts 25 (2003): 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rushton, Sharon. Shelley and Vitality. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

St Clair, William. The Godwins and the Shelleys: The Biography of a Family. London: Faber and Faber, 1989.Google Scholar

St Clair, William ‘The Impact of Frankenstein’, in Mary Shelley in Her Times, ed. Bennett, Betty T. and Curran, Stuart (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000), 38–63.Google Scholar

St Clair, William The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Veeder, William. Mary Shelley and Frankenstein: The Fate of Androgyny. University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Wolfson, Susan J. and Levao, Ronald L. (eds.) The Annotated Frankenstein. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Wollstonecraft, Mary. The Vindications, ed. Macdonald, D. L. and Scherf, Kathleen. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Yousef, Nancy. Isolated Cases: The Anxieties of Autonomy in Enlightenment Philosophy and Romantic Literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zonana, Joyce. ‘They Will Prove the Truth of My Tale: Safie's Letters as the Feminist Core of Shelley's Frankenstein’. Journal of Narrative Technique 21(2) (1991) 170–84.Google Scholar

Bolton, Michael Sean. ‘Monstrous Machinery: Defining Posthuman Gothic’. Aeternum 1(1) (2014), 1–15.Google Scholar

Botting, Fred. Making Monstrous: Frankenstein, Criticism, Theory. Manchester University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity, 2013.Google Scholar

Fincher, Max. Queering the Gothic in the Romantic Age: The Penetrating Eye. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. London: Profile Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Graham, Elaine. Representations of the Post/Human: Monsters, Aliens and Others in Popular Culture. Manchester University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Haggerty, George E. Queer Gothic. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Halberstam, Judith. Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Halliwell, Martin and Mousley, Andy. Critical Humanisms: Humanist/Anti-Humanist Dialogues. Edinburgh University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haraway, Donna J. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books, 1991.Google Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbrechter, Stefan. Posthumanism: a Critical Analysis. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar

Mousley, Andy. Literature and the Human: Criticism, Theory, Practice. London: Routledge, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schoene, Berthold. Writing Men: Literary Masculinities from Frankenstein to the New Man. Edinburgh University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Smith, Andrew and Hughes, William (eds.) EcoGothic. Manchester University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Allen, G. S. Master Mechanics & Wicked Wizards: Images of the American Scientist As Hero and Villain from Colonial Times to the Present. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Chibnail, Steve and Petley, Julian (eds.) British Horror Cinema. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Gooderham, D. ‘Children's Fantasy Literature: Toward an Anatomy’. Children's Literature in Education, 26(3) (1995), 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grieveson, Lee. Policing Cinema: Movies and Censorship in Early Twentieth-Century America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haynes, R. D. From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hutchings, Peter. Hammer and Beyond: The British Horror Film. Manchester University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Jackson, A., Coats, K. and McGillis, R. (eds.) The Gothic in Children's Literature: Haunting the Borders. New York and London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Jones, G. Killing Monsters: Why Children Need Fantasy, Super-Heroes, and Make-Believe Fantasy. New York: Basic Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Newman, Kim (ed.) The BFI Companion to Horror. London: British Film Institute, 1996.Google Scholar

Norris Sands, F. ‘Dr. Frankenstein's Hideous Progeny: A Typology of the Mad Scientist in Contemporary Young Adult Novels and Computer Animated Film.’ Dissertation, Illinois State University, 2015.Google Scholar

Pirie, David. A Heritage of Horror: The English Gothic Cinema, 1946–1972. New York: Equinox, 1974.Google Scholar

Prawer, S. S. Caligari's Children: The Film as Tale of Terror. New York: Da Capo, 1980.Google Scholar

Rigby, Jonathan. English Gothic: A Century of Horror Cinema. London: Reynolds & Hearn, 2004.Google Scholar

Skal, David J. The Monster Show: A Cultural History of Horror. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1994.Google Scholar

Stephens, J. and McCallum, R. Retelling Stories, Framing Culture: Traditional Story and Metanarratives in Children's Literature. New York and London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Tudor, Andrew. Monsters and Mad Scientists: A Cultural History of the Horror Movie. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Uricchio, William and Pearson, Roberta E.. Reframing Culture: The Case of the Vitagraph Quality Films. New Jersey: Princeton, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheatley, Helen. Gothic Television. Manchester University Press, 2006.Google Scholar