Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:21:35.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - DeLillo, postmodernism, postmodernity

from PART I - AESTHETIC AND CULTURAL INFLUENCES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2008

John N. Duvall
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

The reason for the initial groundswell of interest in Don DeLillo in the mid- 1980s and the reason that White Noise (1985) has quickly become one of the most frequently taught postwar novels is that DeLillo is seen as representing the turn to postmodernism in American literature. But the vital question is: in what sense is DeLillo a postmodern writer? Is it his detailed anthropological attention to those aspects of contemporary Western – and perhaps specifically American – life in the age of media saturation and globalized free market capitalism that is characterized by the term postmodernity? Or is it his deployment of a set of stylistic techniques that makes him an exponent of a new artistic register that goes by the name of postmodernism? Or is it a stance of opposition to contemporary economic and political trends that renders him less a gung-ho postmodernist than a determined if somewhat oblique antipostmodernist? The basic debate that has fascinated many readers of DeLillo is whether his writing is able to maintain a critical distance from the culture he describes. Put simply, is his writing a symptom, a diagnosis, or an endorsement of the condition of postmodernity?

After modernism

The critics who have examined DeLillo’s recurrent interest in modernist writers such as James Joyce and William Faulkner and in artistic techniques such as cinematic montage and literary surrealism are undoubtedly correct in suggesting that he has a greater formal and spiritual affinity with the early twentieth-century avant-garde in particular and modernism in general than with other contemporary postmodernist writers. But the irony is that it is the explicitness with which DeLillo acknowledges his enormous debt to modernism that ends up rendering him postmodern.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×