Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:21:39.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Eneolithic period in the Central Balkan Area

from PART I - THE PREHISTORY OF THE BALKANS TO 1000 B.C.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Get access

Summary

The Eneolithic period, which came between the Neolithic Age and the age when metal was fully in use, covered a great length of time. It brought in its wake revolutionary changes in the life of prehistoric man, as he became more and more acquainted with metal and its properties. The production of various metal objects required the acquisition of skills in the working of metal and the learning of techniques for their improvement and perfection. This of necessity caused a series of significant changes in his way of life and altered the nexus of relationships within a social group. For instance, mining and metallurgy inevitably led to new, specialized forms of activities. The haphazard distribution of mines in different territories disrupted the balance between the Neolithic groups which had been based on primitive agriculture. A feeling of insecurity developed and clashes occurred frequently. On the other hand, intensive trading developed for the same reasons, though exchange of goods had not been unknown to Neolithic man. The altered relations, in their turn, resulted in the greater significance of the male in social units and in the development of a patriachal system. Finally, the working of iron and its greater use meant an increase of wealth in the hands of the outstanding personalities of a primitive society. In short, it inaugurated the beginning of social stratification.

Another event of decisive significance for the history of Europe and of the Balkans in particular was a number of great migrations of tribes from the Russian steppes, the Pontic basin and the Lower Danube. In archaeology these migrations are dated to the Neolithic Age, and they are linked with the process of Indo-Europeanization, which was decisive for the further development of society in these regions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benac, A.Studien zur Stein– und Kupferzeit im nordwestlichen Balkan’, 42 Bericht der Römisch–germanischen Kommission (Frankfurt/Main, 1961)Google Scholar
Brukner, B., Jovanović, B. and Tasić, N. Praistorija Vojvodine. Novi Sad, 1974
Chernych, E.Ob osnovnih etapah drevneišoi metallurgii medi na teritorii Bulgarii’, Thracia 3 (1974)Google Scholar
Crossland, R. A.Immigrants from the North’, The Cambridge Ancient History 1.2 2. Cambridge, 1971. Google Scholar
Dimitrijević, S.Die Ljubljana-Kultur, Probleme des Substrats der Genese und der regionalen Chronologie’, Archaeologia Iugoslavica 8 (1967)Google Scholar
Dimitrijević, S.Prilog stupnjevanju badenske grupe u Jugoslaviji’, Arheološki radovi i rasprave 2 (Zagreb, 1962)Google Scholar
Dimitrijević, S.Zur Frage der Genese und der Gliederung der Vučedolkultur in dem Zwischenstromlande Donau–Drave–Save’, Vjesnik Arheološkog muzeja Zagreb 8 (1974 (1976))Google Scholar
Garašanin, M. and Dehn, W.Thrakisch-makedonische Wohnhügel-funde in der Sammlung des vorgeschichtlichen Seminars zu Marburg/Lahn’, jahrbuch des Römisch-germanischen Zentralmuseum-Mainz 10 (1963)Google Scholar
Garašanin, M. and Simoska, D.Kontrolni iskopuvanje na Šupljevec i nekoi problemi na grupata Šupljevec-Bakarno Gumno’, Macedoniae Acta Archaeologica 2 (1976)Google Scholar
Garašanin, M.Die Bestattungen des Vučedoler Burghügels’, Archaeologia Iugoslavica 8 (1968)Google Scholar
Garašanin, M.Kontrollgrabung in Bubanj bei Niš’, Prähist. Zeitschr. – Berlin 26 (1958)Google Scholar
Garašanin, M.Neolithikum und Bronzezeit in Serbien und Makedonien’, 39 Bericht der Römisch–germanischen Kommission (Frankfurt, 1958)Google Scholar
Garašanin, M.Ostava iz Kladova i problem stepskih uticaja u neolitu Donjeg Posunavlja’, Arheološki Vestnik – Ljubljana 5 (1954) 225–36 Google Scholar
Garašanin, M.Pontski i stepski uticaji u neolitu Donjem Podunavlju i na Balkanu’, Glasnik Zemaljskog muzeja u Sarajevu, NS 15–16 (1960–1, Arheologija)Google Scholar
Garašanin, M. Praistorija na tlu S. R. Srbije 1–11. Belgrade, 1973–4 (with resume in French in 11)
Georgiev, G. and Angelov, P.Raskopki na selišnata mogila od Ruse prez 1950–1953’, Izvestia, Bulletin de l'Institut archéologique Bulgare 21 (1957)Google Scholar
Georgiev, G.Kulturgruppen der Jungsteinzeit und der Kupferzeit in der Ebene von Thrakien’, L'Europe à la fin de I' Age de la pierre, 45–106. Praha Liblice 1959 (1961)Google Scholar
Gimbutas, M.Proto-Indo-European Culture. The Kurgan Culture dating from the Fifth, Fourth and Third millennia’, in Cardona, G. et al. Indo-European and Indo-Europeans. Philadelphia, 1970 Google Scholar
Istorija Crna Gore I. (Chapter II: ‘Prehistory’ by , D. and Garašanin, M. ) Titograd 1967 Google Scholar
Jovanović, B., Brukner, B. and Tasić, N.Gomolava 1965–1966’, Rad Vojvodjanskih muzeja 14 (1965) (For other periods also)Google Scholar
Jovanović, B.Copper mining and metallurgy in the Vinča Group’, Antiquity 198 (1976)Google Scholar
Jovanović, B.Tehnologija rudarstva u ranom eneolitu Centralnog Balkana’, Starinar NS 23 (1972)Google Scholar
Jovanović, B.Tumuli stepske kulture grobova jama u Podunavlju’, Starinar NS 26 (1975)Google Scholar
Jovanović, B. Metalurgija eneolitskog perioda u Jugoslaviji. Belgrade, 1971
Kalicz, N. Die Peceler-Badener Kultur und Anatolien. Budapest, 1963
Korošec, P.Neka pitanja oko eneolita Dalmacije’, Arheološki radovi i rasprave 2 (Zagreb 1962)Google Scholar
Kosorić, M.Praistorijska nekropola u selu Dvorovima kod Bijeline’, Članci i gradja za kulturnu istoriju Istočne Bosne 6 (1975)Google Scholar
Merpert, N. J.O svajazah severnogo Pričenomoria i Balkan v rannem bronzovom veke’, Kratkie soobshcheneya Instityta narodov Asii 105 (1965)Google Scholar
Mikov, V.Medni bradvi-kopači v Blgaria’, Zbornik K. Škorpil (Sofia, 1961)Google Scholar
Milojčić, V.Das vorgeschichtliche Bergwerk von Šuplja Stena am Avalaberg bei Belgrad in Serbien’, Wiener prähistorische Zeitschrift 30 (1943)Google Scholar
Prendi, F. Report on excavations at Maliq, Studia Albanica 1966, 25 5ftGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. R. Die Burg Vučedol, Zagreb, 1945
Schubert, F. and , E.Zu den südosteuropäischen Kupferäxten’, Germania 43 (1965)Google Scholar
Simoska, D. and Sanev, V. Praistorija vo centralna Pelagonija – The Prehistory of Central Pelagonia. Bitola, 1976 (Introduction only in English)
Tasić, N.Černavoda III i Boleraz, nalazi u jugoslovenskom Podunavlju i problem hronoloških odnosa kultura bakarnog doba karpatsko-podunavske oblasti’, Balcanica 6 (1975)Google Scholar
Tasić, N.Praistorijsko naselje u Dobanovcima i prilog proučavanju badenske grupe u Vojvodini’, Starinar NS 9–10 (1958–9)Google Scholar
Todorova, H. and Tončeva, G.Die äneolithische Pfahlbausiedlung am Varna-See’, Germania 53 (1975)Google Scholar
Todorova, H. et al. ‘Selišnata mogila Goliamo Delčevo’, Raskopki i proučvania 5 (Sofia, 1975)Google Scholar
Vajsova, H.Einige Fragen über die Chronologie der Gumelnitza Kultur’, Studijne Zvesti arheologickeho ustavu Slovenslej Akademie ved 17 (Nitra, 1969)Google Scholar
Vajsova, H.Stand der Jungsteinzeitforschung in Bulgarien’, Slovenska Archaeologia 14 (Bratislava, 1966)Google Scholar
Vinski-Gasparini, K.Iskopavanje prethistorijskog naselja kod Belog Manastira’, Osječki zbornik 5 (1965)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×