Theoretical conditions for validity in accounting performance measurement

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511488481.012

9 - Theoretical conditions for validity in accounting performance measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Hanne Nørreklit ,

Lennart Nørreklit and

Falconer Mitchell

Edited by

Andy Neely

Show author details

Hanne Nørreklit: Affiliation:
Professor of Management Accounting and Control Aarhus School of Business, Denmark
Lennart Nørreklit: Affiliation:
Professor Danish Centre for Philosophy and Science Studies, Aalborg University, Denmark
Falconer Mitchell: Affiliation:
Professor of Management Accounting University of Edinburg, UK
Andy Neely: Affiliation:
Cranfield University, UK

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

The concept of truth is a foundation upon which the accounting profession has built its reputation. The need for truth in accounting is enshrined in ethical codes, accounting regulations, authoritative texts and, of course, the auditor's assignation of a “true and fair view”. MacNeal, in his classic critique of accounting, has emphasized the salient role of truth for the accountant:

Accounting is the language of finance. Members of the accounting profession are interpreters upon whom the vast majority of people must rely for information … If interpreters do not tell the truth, or tell truths intermixed with half truths, many people will be deceived to their hurt.

(MacNeal, 1970[1939], 1)

The absence of truth from accounting information, or, indeed, even doubts about its presence, can have profound effects upon the accounting profession, its operation and its regulation. For example, in the United Kingdom in the late 1960s and 1970s the criticism of the flexibility of accounting practice during the GEC/AEI merger and the Leasco Pergamon affair preceded and triggered the implementation of a national system of accounting standardization (Stamp and Marley, 1970; Leach and Stamp, 1981; Stamp 1985). More recently, in the United States, the Enron scandal, and subsequently the Worldcom scandal, destroyed a leading international firm of accountants – Arthur Andersen – and led to a marked strengthening of formal corporate governance regulations.

Truth is, therefore, a very practical and immediate issue for accountants.

Type: Chapter
Information: Business Performance Measurement
Unifying Theory and Integrating Practice
, pp. 179 - 217

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488481.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arbib, M. A., and Hesse, M. (1986). The Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Arbnor, I., and Bjerke, B. (1997). Methodology for Creating Business Knowledge. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Adorno, Th. W., Dahrendorf, R., and Pilot, H. (1991). Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Darmstadt: Luchterhand Literaturvig.Google Scholar

Argyris, C., and Kaplan, R. S. (1994). Implementing new knowledge: the case of activity-based costing. Accounting Horizons, 8(3), 83–105.Google Scholar

Chambers, R. J. (1966). Accounting Evaluation and Economic Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Haas, M. and Kleingeld, A. (1999). A multilevel design of performance measurement systems: enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization. Management Accounting Research, 10, 233–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (1988 [1628/9]). Regulae ad directionem Ingenii. In Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D. (eds.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Edelman, J. M. (1977). Political Language: Words that Succeed and Politics that Fail. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, E. O., and Bell, P. W. (1973). The Theory and Measurement of Business Income. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, I. (1906). The Nature of Capital and Income. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fisher, I.(1930). The Theory of Interest. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H. G. (1960). Warheit und Methode. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Grady, , (1991). Performance measurement: implementing strategy. Management Accounting, 72, 49–53.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1913). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und Phänomenologischen Philosophie. The Mague: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Hicks, J. R. (1946). Value and Capital. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1999 [1787]). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Leach, R. G., and Stamp, E. (1981). British Accounting Standards: The First Ten Years. Cambridge: Woodhead Faulkner.Google Scholar

MacNeal, K. (1970 [1939]). Truth in Accounting. Lawrence, KS: Scholars Book Company.Google Scholar

Mautz, R. A., and Sharaf, H. A. (1961). The Philosophy of Auditing. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.Google Scholar

May, G. O. (1972). Financial Accounting: A Distillation of Experience. Houston: Scholars Book Company.Google Scholar

Meyer, J., and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure of myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nørreklit, H. (2000). The balance on the balanced scorecard: a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 65–88.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nørreklit, H., and Schoenfeld, H. M. (2000). Controlling multinational companies: an attempt to analyze some unresolved issues. International Journal of Accounting, 35(3), 415–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nørreklit, L., Nørreklit, H. and Israelsen, P. (2006). Validity of management control topoi: towards a constructivist pragmatism. Management Accounting Research, 17(1), 42–71.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nørreklit, L. and Schoenfeld, H. M. (1996). Resources of the Firm, Creating, Controlling and Accounting. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.Google Scholar

Paton, W. A. (1962). Accounting Theory. Houston: Scholars Book Company.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1965). Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in Numbers.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Solomons, D. (1991a). Accounting and social change: a neutralist view. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(3), 287–95.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stamp, E. (1985). The politics of professional accounting research: some personal reflections. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(1), 111–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stamp, E., and Marley, C. (1970). Accounting Principles and the City Code: The Case for Reform. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar

Sterling, R. R. (1970). Towards a Science of Accounting. Lawrence, KS: Scholars Book Company.Google Scholar

Strauss, A., and Corbin R. R.(1979). Theory of the Measurement of Enterprise Income. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Thomas, A. L. (1969). The Allocation Problem in Financial Accounting Theory, Studies in Accounting Research no. 3. Evanston, IL: American Accounting Association.Google Scholar

Thomas, A. L.(1974). The Allocation Problem: Part Two, Studies in Accounting Research no. 9. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Tinker, A. M., Merino, B. D., and Neimark, M. D. (1982). The normative origins of positive theories: ideology and accounting thought. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(2), 167–200.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tinker, T. (1991). The accountant as partisan. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(3), 297–310.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar