Can the Effects of Climate Change on British Bryophytes be Distinguished from those Resulting from Other Environmental Changes?

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511779701.020

19 - Can the Effects of Climate Change on British Bryophytes be Distinguished from those Resulting from Other Environmental Changes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2012

Jeffrey W. Bates and

Christopher D. Preston

Edited by

Zoltán Tuba ,

Nancy G. Slack and

Lloyd R. Stark

Show author details

Jeffrey W. Bates: Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Christopher D. Preston: Affiliation:
Biological Records Centre, Oxfordshire, UK
Nancy G. Slack: Affiliation:
Sage Colleges, New York
Lloyd R. Stark: Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

The old adage that an Englishman's favorite topic of conversation is the weather is surely true, but why bother to consider the flora of Great Britain in an international summary of the effects of climate change on bryophytes? We can offer five main justifications. The first two are the relative thoroughness of Britain's bryological exploration and the long period over which the flora has been repeatedly examined. Third is the high quality of the general recording effort and its documentation in written and computerized records, and in refereed herbarium specimens. Fourth is the exceptional species-richness of the British flora in a regional (European) context.

Our fifth justification concerns the long run of systematic climatic measurements for England which, like the bryophyte records, extends back into the seventeenth century. More recent records are available for a wide range of localities across the whole of the UK. Today, the UK Meteorological Office is one of the world's leading weather forecasters and through its Hadley Centre carries out research into climatic change and publishes regular reports, updating recent weather trends and making available the latest predictions for the future climate of Britain.

Despite the advantages listed above, the task of locating unequivocal examples of recent climate change impacting the British bryophyte flora has not proven to be straightforward. Many areas of Britain are densely populated and almost all its vegetation is managed, often intensively, so that human impacts are all-pervasive; there are no wilderness areas.

Type: Chapter
Information: Bryophyte Ecology and Climate Change , pp. 371 - 408

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779701.020 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, K. J. & Preston, C. D. (1992). Evidence for the effects of atmospheric pollution on bryophytes from national and local recording. In Biological Recording of Changes in British Wildlife, ed. Harding, P. T., pp. 31–43. ITE Symposium no. 26. London: HMSO.

Arft, A. M., Walker, M. D., Gurevitch, J.et al. (1999). Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: meta-analysis of the international tundra experiment. Ecological Monographs 69: 491–511.Google Scholar

Averis, A. B. G. (2007). Habitats of Colura calyptrifolia in north-western Britain. Field Bryology 91: 17–21.Google Scholar

Bates, J. W. (1989). Growth of Leucobryum glaucum cushions in a Berkshire oakwood. Journal of Bryology 15: 785–91.Google Scholar

Bates, J. W. (1993a). Regional calcicoly in the moss Rhytidiadelphus triquetrus: survival and chemistry of transplants at a formerly SO2-polluted site with acid soil. Annals of Botany 72: 449–55.Google Scholar

Bates, J. W. (1993b). Comparative growth patterns of the thalloid liverworts Pallavicinia lyellii and Pellia epiphylla at Silwood Park, Southern England. Journal of Bryology 17: 439–45.Google Scholar

Bates, J. W. (1995). A bryophyte flora of Berkshire. Journal of Bryology 18: 503–620.Google Scholar

Bates, J. W. (2000). Mineral nutrition, substratum ecology, and pollution. In Bryophyte Biology, ed. Shaw, A. J. & Goffinet, B., pp. 248–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Bates, J. W. (2002). Effects on bryophytes and lichens. In Air Pollution and Plant Life, ed. Bell, J. N. B. & Treshow, M., pp. 309–42. Chichester & New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Bates, J. W., Bell, J. N. B. & Massara, A. C. (2001). Loss of Lecanora conizaeoides and other fluctuations of epiphytes on oak in S. E. England over 21 years with declining SO2 concentrations. Atmospheric Environment 35: 2557–68.Google Scholar

Bates, J. W., Perry, A. R. & Proctor, M. C. F. (1993). The natural history of Slapton Ley National Nature Reserve. XX. The changing bryophyte flora. Field Studies 8: 279–333.Google Scholar

Bates, J. W. & Phoon, X. (2009). Salinity tolerance and survival of the rocky-seashore bryophyte Schistidium maritimum. In Bryology in the New Millenium, 2007, ed. Mohammed, H., Bakar, B. H., Boyce, A. N. & Lee, P., pp. 317–28. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Botanical Garden.

Bates, J. W., Proctor, M. C. F., Preston, C. D., Hodgetts, N. G. & Perry, A. R. (1997). Occurrence of epiphytic bryophytes in a ‘tetrad’ transect across southern Britain. 1. Geographical trends in abundance and evidence of recent change. Journal of Bryology 19: 685–714.Google Scholar

Bates, J. W., Roy, D. B. & Preston, C. D. (2004). Occurrence of epiphytic bryophytes in a ‘tetrad’ transect across southern Britain. 2. Analysis and modelling of epiphyte-environmental relationships. Journal of Bryology 26: 181–97.Google Scholar

Bates, J. W., Thompson, K. & Grime, J. P. (2005). Effects of simulated long-term climatic change on the bryophytes of a limestone grassland community. Global Change Biology 11: 757–69.Google Scholar

Bosanquet, S. D. S. (2004). Colura calyptrifolia in Wales. Field Bryology 82: 3–5.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, M. E., Ellis, R. W. & Preston, C. D. (2006). Change in the British Flora 1987–2004. London: Botanical Society of the British Isles.

Busby, J. R., Bliss, L. C. & Hamilton, C. D. (1978). Microclimatic control of growth rates and habits of the boreal mosses Tomenthypnum nitens and Hylocomium splendens. Ecological Monographs 48: 95–110.Google Scholar

Convey, P. & Lewis Smith, R. I. (2006). Responses of terrestrial Antarctic ecosystems to climate change. Plant Ecology 182: 1–10.Google Scholar

Crawford, R. M. M. (2008). Plants at the Margin: Ecological Limits and Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Davies, L., Bates, J. W., Bell, J. N. B., James, P. W. & Purvis, O. W. (2007). Diversity and sensitivity of epiphytes to oxides of nitrogen in London. Environmental Pollution 146: 299–310.Google Scholar

Bakker, A. J. (1989). Effects of ammonia emission on epiphytic lichen vegetation. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 38: 337–42.Google Scholar

Dilks, T. J. K. & Proctor, M. C. F. (1975). Comparative experiments on temperature responses of bryophytes: assimilation, respiration and freezing damage. Journal of Bryology 8: 317–36.Google Scholar

During, H. J. (1979). Life strategies of bryophytes: a preliminary review. Lindbergia 5: 2–18.Google Scholar

Ellis, C. E., Coppins, B. J., Dawson, T. P. & Seaward, M. R. D. (2007). Response of British lichens to climate change scenarios: trends and uncertainties in the projected impact for contrasting biogeographic groups. Biological Conservation 140: 217–35.Google Scholar

Farmer, A. M., Bates, J. W. & Bell, J. N. B. (1992). Ecophysiological effects of acid rain on bryophytes and lichens. In Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, ed. Bates, J. W. & Farmer, A. M., pp. 284–313. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ferguson, P. & Lee, J. A. (1983). Past and present sulphur pollution in the southern Pennines. Atmospheric Environment 6: 1131–7.Google Scholar

Fitter, A. H. & Hay, R. K. M. (2002). Environmental Physiology of Plants, 3rd edn. London: Academic Press.

Fitter, A. H. & Fitter, R. S. R. (2002). Rapid change in flowering time in British plants. Science 296: 1689–91.Google Scholar

Frahm, J.-P. & Klaus, D. (1997). Moose als Indikatoren von Klimafluktuationen in Mitteleuropa. Erdkunde 51: 181–90.Google Scholar

Furness, S. B. & Grime, J. P. (1982). Growth rate and temperature responses in bryophytes. II. A comparative study of species of contrasted ecology. Journal of Ecology 70: 525–36.Google Scholar

Gabriel, R. M. de A. (2000). Ecophysiology of Azorean forest bryophytes. Unpublished PhD thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, London.

Gilbert, O. L. (1968). Bryophytes as indicators of air pollution in the Tyne Valley. New Phytologist 67: 15–30.Google Scholar

Gilbert, O. L. (1970). Further studies on the effect of sulphur dioxide on lichens and bryophytes. New Phytologist 69: 605–27.Google Scholar

Green, T. G. A. & Clayton-Green, K. A. (1981). Studies on Dawsonia superba Grev. II. Growth rate. Journal of Bryology 11: 723–31.Google Scholar

Greven, H. C. (1992). Changes in the Dutch Bryophyte Flora and Air Pollution. Dissertationes Botanicae Band 194. Berlin & Stuttgart: J. Cramer.

Grime, J. P., Brown, V. K., Thompson, K.et al. (2000). The response of two contrasting limestone grasslands to simulated climate change. Science 289: 762–5.Google Scholar

Grime, J. P., Fridley, J. D., Askew, A. P.et al. (2008). Long-term resistance to simulated climate change in an infertile grassland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 10028–32.Google Scholar

Harte, J. & Shaw, R. (1995). Shifting dominance within a montane vegetation community: results of a climate-warming experiment. Science 267: 876–80.Google Scholar

Hartmann, E. & Jenkins, G. I. (1984). Photomorphogenesis of mosses and liverworts. In The Experimental Biology of Bryophytes, ed. Dyer, A. F. & Duckett, J. G., pp. 203–28. London: Academic Press.

Hill, M. O. & Preston, C. D. (1998). The geographical relationships of British and Irish bryophytes. Journal of Bryology 20: 127–226.Google Scholar

Hill, M. O., Blackstock, T. H., Long, D. G. & Rothero, G. P. (2008). A Checklist and Census Catalogue of British and Irish Bryophytes: Updated 2008. Middlewich: British Bryological Society.

Hill, M. O., Preston, C. D., Bosanquet, S. D. S. & Roy, D. B. (2007). BRYOATT: Attributes of British and Irish Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts. Huntingdon: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.

Hill, M. O., Preston, C. D. & Smith, A. J. E. (1991). Atlas of the Bryophytes of Britain and Ireland. Volume 1. Liverworts (Hepaticae and Anthocerotae). Colchester: Harley Books.

Hill, M. O., Preston, C. D. & Smith, A. J. E. (1992). Atlas of the Bryophytes of Britain and Ireland. Volume 2. Mosses (except Diplolepideae). Colchester: Harley Books.

Hill, M. O., Preston, C. D. & Smith, A. J. E. (1994). Atlas of the Bryophytes of Britain and Ireland. Volume 3. Mosses (Diplolepideae). Colchester: Harley Books.

Hopkins, J. (2007). British wildlife and climate change. 1. Evidence of change. British Wildlife 18: 153–9.Google Scholar

Hulme, M., Jenkins, G. J., Lu, X.et al. (2002). Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom: the UKCIP02 Report. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

Ingham, W. (ed.) (1907). A Census Catalogue of British Mosses. York: Moss Exchange Club.

Jenkins, G. J., Perry, M. C. & Prior, M. J. O. (2007). The Climate of the United Kingdom and Recent Trends. Exeter: Meteorological Office Hadley Centre.

Jones, E. W. (1991). The changing bryophyte flora of Oxfordshire. Journal of Bryology 16: 513–49.Google Scholar

Knoop, B. (1984). Development in bryophytes. In The Experimental Biology of Bryophytes, ed. Dyer, A. F. & Duckett, J. G., pp. 143–76. London: Academic Press.

Körner, C. (1999). Alpine Plant Life. Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef

Lee, J. A., Caporn, S. J. M., Carroll, J.et al. (1998). Effects of ozone and atmospheric nitrogen deposition on bryophytes. In Bryology for the Twenty-first Century, ed. Bates, J. W., Ashton, N. W. & Duckett, J. G., pp. 331–41. Leeds: Maney & The British Bryological Society.

Lee, J. A., Parsons, A. N. & Baxter, R. (1993). Sphagnum species and polluted environments, past and future. Advances in Bryology 5: 297–313.Google Scholar

Lee, J. A. & Studholme, C. J. (1992). Responses of Sphagnum species to polluted environments. In Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, ed. Bates, J. W. & Farmer, A. M., pp. 314–32. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Lösch, R., Kappen, L. & Wolf, A. (1983). Productivity and temperature biology of two snowbed bryophytes. Polar Biology 1: 243–8.Google Scholar

Macvicar, S. M. (1905). Census Catalogue of British Hepatics. York: Moss Exchange Club.

Massara, A. C., Bates, J. W. & Bell, J. N. B. (2009). Exploring causes of the decline of the lichen Lecanora conizaeoides in Britain: effects of experimental N and S applications. Lichenologist 41: 673–81.Google Scholar

Miles, C. J., Odu, E. A. & Longton, R. E. (1989). Phenological studies on British mosses. Journal of Bryology 15: 607–21.Google Scholar

Monteith, D. T. & Evans, C. D. (2005). The United Kingdom Acid Waters Monitoring Network: a review of the first fifteen years and introduction to the special issue. Environmental Pollution 137: 3–13.Google Scholar

O'Halloran, J., Gribbin, S. D., Tyler, S. J. & Ormrod, S. J. (1990). The ecology of Dipper (Cinclus cinclus L.) in relation to stream acidity in upland Wales: time-activity budget and energy expenditure. Oecologia 85: 271–80.Google Scholar

Pearson, J., Wells, D. M., Seller, K. J.et al. (2000). Traffic exposure increases natural 15N and heavy metal concentrations in mosses. New Phytologist, 147: 317–26.Google Scholar

Peñuelas, J., Ogaya, R., Hunt, J. M. & Jump, A. S. (2008). Twentieth century changes of tree-ring δ13C at the southern range-edge of Fagus sylvatica: increasing water-use efficiency does not avoid the growth decline induced by warming at low altitudes. Global Change Biology 14: 1076–88.Google Scholar

Peterken, G. F. (1993). Woodland Conservation and Management, 2nd edn. London: Chapman & Hall.

Pitkin, P. H. (1975). Variability and seasonality of the growth of some corticolous pleurocarpous mosses. Journal of Bryology 8: 337–56.Google Scholar

Porley, R. & Hodgetts, N. (2005). Mosses and Liverworts. The New Naturalist Library 97. London: Collins.

Potter, J. A., Press, M. C., Callaghan, T. V. & Lee, J. A. (1995). Growth responses of Polytrichum commune and Hylocomium splendens to simulated environmental change in the sub-arctic. New Phytologist 131: 533–41.Google Scholar

Preston, C. D. & Hill, M. O. (2009). Bryophyte records. Nature in Cambridgeshire 51: 92–5.Google Scholar

Preston, C. D., Hill, M. O., Bosanquet, S. D. S. & Ames, S. L. (2009). Progress towards a new Atlas of Bryophytes. Field Bryology 98: 14–20.Google Scholar

Preston, C. D., Pearman, D. A. & Dines, T. D. (eds.) (2002). New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rose, F. (1992). Temperate forest management: its effects on bryophyte and lichen floras and habitats. In Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, ed. Bates, J. W. & Farmer, A. M., pp. 211–33. Oxford: Clarendon Press,

Tallis, J. H. (1964). Studies on the Southern Pennine peats. II. The behaviour of Sphagnum. Journal of Ecology 52: 345–53.Google Scholar

Herk, C. M. (2001). Bark pH and susceptibility to toxic air pollutants as independent causes of changes in epiphytic lichen composition in space and time. Lichenologist 33: 415–41.Google Scholar

Watson, E. V. (1985). The recording activities of the BBS (1923–83) and their impact on advancing knowledge. In British Bryological Society Diamond Jubilee, ed. Longton, R. E. & Perry, A. R., pp. 17–29. Cardiff: British Bryological Society.

Winner, W. E. (1988). Responses of bryophytes to air pollution. In Lichens, Bryophytes, and Air Quality, ed. Nash, T. H. & Wirth, V., pp. 141–73. Berlin: J. Cramer.

Wookey, P. A., Parsons, A. N., Welker, J. M.et al. (1993). Comparative responses of phenology and reproductive development to simulated climate change in sub-arctic and high arctic plants. Oikos 67: 490–502.Google Scholar