Towards the Mechanization of the Human Body

Althoff, J. 1992. Warm, kalt, flüssig und fest bei Aristoteles: Die elementarqualitäten in den zoologischen Schriften (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Barnes, J., ed. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 1-vol. digital edition, Bollingen Series lxxi.2 (Princeton).Google Scholar

Berryman, S. 2009. The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Booth, N. B. 1960. ‘Empedocles’ Account of Breathing’, JHS, 80: 10–15.Google Scholar

Bremer, D. 1980. ‘Aristoteles, Empedokles und die Erkenntnisleistung der Metapher’, Poetica, 12: 350–76.Google Scholar

Craddock, P. T. 2008. ‘Mining and Metallurgy’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 93–120.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. 2005. Galeni De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, vol. 2, Corpus Medicorum Graecorum v 4,1,2 (Berlin).Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. 2017. ‘Aristotle’s Heart and the Heartless Man’, in Wee, J. Z., ed., The Comparable Body: Analogy and Metaphor in Ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Greco-Roman Medicine (Leiden), 122–41.Google Scholar

Fleming, G. 1873 ². The Comparative Anatomy of the Domesticated Animals by A. Chauveau, translated and edited by George Fleming (London).Google Scholar

Forbes, R. J. 1964. Studies in Ancient Technology, vol. 4 (Leiden).Google Scholar

Gans, C. and Hughes, G. M.. 1967. ‘The Mechanism of Lung Ventilation in the Tortoise Testudo Graeca Linne’, J. Exp. Biol., 47: 1–20.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Guthrie, W. K. C. 1939. Aristotle: On the Heavens (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Hahn, R. 2010, Archaeology and the Origins of Philosophy (Albany, N. York).Google Scholar

Harris, C. R. S. 1973. The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine (Oxford).Google Scholar

Healy, J. F. 1978. Mining and Metallurgy in the Greek and Roman World (London).Google Scholar

Holmes, B. 2010. The Symptom and the Subject: The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece (Princeton).CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2017. ‘Aristotelian Mechanistic Explanation’, in Rocca, J., ed., Teleology in the Ancient World (Cambridge), 125–50.Google Scholar

Korobili, G. 2022. Aristotle. On Youth and Old Age, Life and Death, and Respiration 1–6. With Translation, Introduction and Interpretation (Cham).Google Scholar

Last, H. 1924. ‘Empedokles and His Klepsydra Again’, CQ, 18: 169–73.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001. Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals i–iv (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Longrigg, J. 1993. Greek Rational Medicine (London).CrossRef Google Scholar

Mattusch, C. 2008. ‘Metalworking and Tools’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 418–38.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. 1970. ‘The Effect of a Simile: Empedocles’ Theories of Seeing and Breathing’, JHS, 90: 140–79.Google Scholar

Oser-Grote, C. M. 2004. Aristoteles und das Corpus Hippocraticum (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Powell, J. U. 1923. ‘The Simile of the Clepsydra in Empedocles’, CQ, 17: 172–4.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rashed, M. 2008. ‘De qui la clepsydre est-elle le nom? Une interpretation du fragment 100 d’Empédocle’, REG, 121.2: 443–68.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1955. Aristotle: Parva Naturalia. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar

Siwek, P. 1963. Aristoteles: Parva Naturalia graece et latine (Rome).Google Scholar

Smith, W. 1859 ². Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (Boston).Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1997. ‘Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Medicine’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S., eds., Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart), 183–208.Google Scholar

Thivel, A. 2005, ‘Air, Pneuma and Breathing from Homer to Hippocrates’, in van der Eijk, P. J., ed., Hippocrates in Context: Papers read at the xith International Hippocrates Colloquium University of Newcastle upon Tyne 27–31 August 2002 (Leiden), 239–49.Google Scholar

Timpanaro Cardini, M. 1957. ‘Respirazione e Clessidra’, PP, 12: 250–70.Google Scholar

Tsaimou, K. G. 1997. Αρχαιογνωσία των μετάλλων: αρχαία μεταλλευτική και μεταλλουργική τεχνική (Athens).Google Scholar

Ulrich, R. 2008. ‘Representations of Technical Processes’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 35–61.Google Scholar

Wee, J. Z. 2017. ‘Earthquake and Epilepsy: The Body Geologic in the Hippocratic Treatise On the Sacred Disease’, in Wee, J. Z., ed., The Comparable Body: Analogy and Metaphor in Ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Greco-Roman Medicine (Leiden), 142–67.Google Scholar

Worthen, T. D. 1970. ‘Pneumatic Action in the Klepsydra and Empedocles’ Account of Breathing’, Isis, 61.4: 520–30.Google Scholar

Barthélémy-Saint Hilaire, J. 1891. Les Problèmes d’Aristote, vol. 1 (Paris).Google Scholar

Bodnár, I. 2015. “The Problemata physica: An Ιntroduction,” in Mayhew, R., ed., The Aristotelian Problemata physica: Philosophical and Scientific Investigations (Leiden), 1–9.Google Scholar

Bonaventura, F. 1593. Anemologiae pars prior, id est De affectionibus, signis, causisque ventorum ex Aristotele, Theophrasto, ac Ptolomaeo tractatus (Urbino).Google Scholar

Burnikel, W. 1974. Textgeschichtliche Untersuchungen Zu Neun Opuscula Theophrasts (Wiesbaden)Google Scholar

Coutant, V. and Eichenlaub, V. L.. 1975. Theophrastus: De Ventis (South Bend, IN).Google Scholar

Danker, F. W., ed. 2000. A Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. (Chicago).Google Scholar

Flashar, H. 1962. Aristoteles: Problemata Physica (Berlin).Google Scholar

Furlanus, D. 1605. Theophrasti Eresii: Peripateticorum post Aristotelem Principis (Hanover).Google Scholar

Gigon, O. 1937. “Theophrastos Über die Winde, Text, Kommentar und Einleitung.” Diss. University of Basel.Google Scholar

Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, H. S.. 1996. Greek–English Lexicon. Revised Supplement (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Louis, P. 1991. Aristote: Problèmes, vol. 1: Sections i–x (Paris).Google Scholar

Marenghi, G. 1999. Aristotele: Problemi di Medicina: Testo Critico, Traduzione e Commento, 2nd ed. (Milan).Google Scholar

Mayhew, R. 2011. Aristotle: Problems: vol. 1 (Books 1–19), vol. 2 (Books 20–38, with D. Mirhady, [Arist.] Rhet. to Alex.) (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Mayhew, R. 2015. “Problemata 26 and Theophrastus’ De ventis: A Preliminary Comparison,” in Mayhew, R., ed., The Aristotelian Problemata physica: Philosophical and Scientific Investigations (Leiden), 294–310.Google Scholar

Mayhew, R. 2018. Theophrastus of Eresus: On Winds (Leiden).Google Scholar

Schneider, I. G. 1818. Theophrasti Eresii quae supersunt opera et excerpta librorum, vol. 1 (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Sider, D. and Brunschön, C. W.. 2007. Theophrastus of Eresus: On Weather Signs (Leiden).Google Scholar

Sollenberger, M. G. 2003. “Theophrastus of Eresus, On Fatigue,” in Fortenbaugh, W. W., Sharples, R. W., and Sollenberger, M. G.. eds., Theophrastus of Eresus, On Sweat, On Dizziness and On Fatigue (Leiden), 251–324.Google Scholar

Tassios, T. P. 2018. “Mechanical Properties of Solids in Aristotle’s Meteorologica,” in Sfendoni-Mentzou, D., ed., Aristotle: Contemporary Perspectives on His Thought (Berlin) 151–64.Google Scholar

Vascosanus, M. 1551, Teophrasti De Ventis (Paris).Google Scholar

Webster, C. 2014. “Technology and/as Theory: Material Thinking in Ancient Science and Medicine.” Dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Wimmer, F. 1862. Theophrasti Eresii opera quae supersunt omnia, vol. 3 (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Wimmer, F. 1866. Theophrasti Eresii opera quae supersunt Omnia (Paris).Google Scholar

Asper, M. 2017. ‘Machines on Paper: From Words to Acts in Ancient Mechanics’, in Formisano, M. and van der Eijk, P. J., eds., Knowledge, Text and Practice in Ancient Technical Writing (Cambridge), 27–52.Google Scholar

Berrey, M. 2017. Hellenistic Science at Court (Berlin).Google Scholar

Berryman, S. 2009. The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy (Cambridge).CrossRef Google Scholar

Berryman, S. 2020. ‘Ancient Greek Mechanics and the Mechanical Hypothesis’, in Taub, L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek and Roman Science (Cambridge), 229–47.Google Scholar

Brain, P. 1986. Galen on Bloodletting: A Study of the Origins, Development and Validity of His Opinions, with a Translation of the Three Works (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Brock, A. J. 1916. Galen: On the Natural Faculties (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Craik, E. 2006. Two Hippocratic Treatises, On Sight and On Anatomy (Leiden).Google Scholar

Craik, E. 2015. The ‘Hippocratic’ Corpus: Content and Context (New York).Google Scholar

Craik, E. 2017. ‘Teleology in Hippocratic Texts: Clues to the Future?’, in Rocca, J., ed., Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches (Cambridge), 203–16.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. 2007. Technology and Culture in Greek and Roman Antiquity (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. 2008. ‘Technology’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 15–34.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. 2018. ‘Greek Mechanics’, in Jones, A. and Taub, L., eds., The Cambridge History of Science: Volume i: Ancient Science (Cambridge), 449–67.Google Scholar

Cuypers, M. 2010. ‘Historiography, Rhetoric, and Science: Rethinking a Few Assumptions on Hellenistic Prose’ in Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M., eds., A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Chichester), 317–36.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. 2000. Unweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder (Boston).Google Scholar

Erginel, M. M. 2019. ‘Plato on Pleasures Mixed with Pains: An Asymetrical Account’, OSAP, 56: 73–122.Google Scholar

Fisher, N. 2017. ‘Demosthenes and the Use of Disgust’, in Lateiner, D. and Spatharas, D., eds., The Ancient Emotion of Disgust (Oxford), 103–24.Google Scholar

Flemming, R. 2005. ‘Empires of Knowledge: Medicine and Health in the Hellenistic World’, in Erskine, A., ed., A Companion to the Hellenistic World (Oxford), 449–63.Google Scholar

Flemming, R. 2009. ‘Demiurge and Emperor in Galen’s World of Knowledge’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J., eds., Galen and the World of Knowledge (Cambridge), 59–84.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1988. ‘The Empiricist Attitude Towards Reason and Theory’ in Hankinson, R. J., ed., Method, Medicine and Metaphysics: Studies in the Philosophy of Ancient Science. Apeiron, 21: 70–97.Google Scholar

Furley, D. 1989. Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Garofalo, I. 1988. Erasistrati Fragmenta (Pisa).Google Scholar

Gelber, J. 2021. ‘Teleological Perspectives in Aristotle’s Biology’, in Connell, S. M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge), 97–113.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gleason, M. 2009. ‘Shock and Awe: The Performance Dimension of Galen’s Anatomy Demonstrations’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J., eds., Galen and the World of Knowledge (Cambridge), 85–114.Google Scholar

Glucklich, A. 2001. Sacred Pain: Hurting the Body for the Sake of the Soul (Oxford).Google Scholar

Grant, R. M. 2011. Miracle and Natural Law in Graeco-Roman and Early Christian Thought (Eugene, OR).Google Scholar

Gundert, B. 1992. ‘Parts and Their Roles in Hippocratic Medicine’, Isis, 83: 453–65.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 1995. ‘The Growth of Medical Empiricism’, in Bates, D., ed., Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions (Cambridge), 60–83.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 1997. ‘Hellenistic Biological Sciences’, in Furley, D., ed., From Aristotle to Augustine: Routledge History of Philosophy, vol. 2 (London), 320–55.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 1998a. Galen: On Antecedent Causes, Edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 1998b. Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hett, W. S., ed. 1936. Aristotle: Minor Works (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Hegele, A. 2022. Romantic Autopsy: Literary Form and Medical Reading (Oxford).Google Scholar

Holmes, B. 2010. The Symptom and the Subject: The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar

Holmes, B. 2014. ‘Proto-Sympathy in the Hippocratic Corpus’, in Jouanna, J. and Zink, M., eds., Hippocrate et les hippocratismes: médécine, religion, société (Paris), 123–38.Google Scholar

Holmes, B. 2018. ‘Body’, in Pormann, P. E., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hippocrates (Cambridge), 63–88.CrossRef Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2020. ‘From Craft to Nature: The Emergence of Natural Teleology’, in Taub, L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek and Roman Science (Cambridge), 102–20.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2017. ‘Aristotelian Mechanistic Explanation’, in Rocca, J., ed., Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches (Cambridge), 125–50.Google Scholar

Kazantzidis, G. 2017. ‘Empathy and the Limits of Disgust in the Hippocratic Corpus’, in Lateiner, D. and Spatharas, D., eds., The Ancient Emotion of Disgust (Oxford), 45–68.Google Scholar

Kazantzidis, G. 2018. ‘Medicine and the Paradox in the Hippocratic Corpus and beyond’, in Gerolemou, M., ed., Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond (Berlin), 31–61.Google Scholar

Kazantzidis, G., ed. 2019. Medicine and Paradoxography in the Ancient World (Berlin).Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. 2007. ‘Making a Text of the Universe: Perspectives on Discursive Order in the De Rerum Natura of Lucretius’, in Gale, M., ed., Oxford Readings in Lucretius (Oxford), 376–96.Google Scholar

Krafft, F. 1967. ‘Die Anfänge einer theoretischen Mechanik und die Wandlung ihrer Stellung zur Wissenschaft von Natur’, in Baron, W., ed., Beiträge zur Methodik der Wissenschaftsgeschichte (Wiesbaden), 12–33.Google Scholar

Krafft, F. 1973. ‘Kunst und Natur: Die Heronische Frage und die Technik in der klassischen Antike’, Antike und Abendland, 19: 1–19.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1985. ‘Theophrastus on the Limits of Teleology’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M. and Long, A. A., eds., Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work (New Brunswick), 146–63.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001. Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals i–iv (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2018. ‘Aristotle, Dissection, and Generation: Experience, Expertise, and the Practices of Knowing’, in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D., eds., Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge), 249–72.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2010. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2021. ‘Empiricism and Hearsay in Aristotle’s Zoological Collection of Facts’, in Connell, S. M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge), 64–82.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1973. Greek Science after Aristotle (London).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1975. ‘Alcmaeon and the Early History of Dissection’, Sudhoffs Archiv, 59: 113–47.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1978. Hippocratic Writings (Harmondsworth).Google Scholar

Longrigg, J. 1993. Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians (London).Google Scholar

Lonie, I. M. 1973. ‘The Paradoxical Text ‘On the Heart”’, Medical History, 17: 1–15 and 136–53.Google Scholar

MacDonald, H. 2005, Human Remains: Dissection and Its Histories (New Haven).Google Scholar

Malland, L. R. 2022, ‘Her Body, His Evidence: Female Subjugation in the Early Modern Anatomy Theaters’, in Malland, L. R., ed., The Spaces of Renaissance Anatomy Theater (Wilmington, DE), 89–108.Google Scholar

Mayor, A. 2018. Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines, and Ancient Dreams of Technology (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar

Neer, R. 2010. The Emergence of the Classical Style in Greek Sculpture (Chicago).Google Scholar

Netz, R. 2020. Scale, Space and Canon in Ancient Literary Culture (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Nutton, V. 2004. Ancient Medicine (London).Google Scholar

Oleson, J. P. 1984. Greek and Roman Mechanical Water-Lifting Devices: The History of a Technology (Toronto).Google Scholar

Park, K. 2006, Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation, and the Origins of Human Dissection (New York).Google Scholar

Polito, R. 2006. ‘Matter, Medicine, and the Mind: Asclepiades vs. Epicurus’, OSAP, 30: 285–335.Google Scholar

Rihl, T. E. 2018. ‘Mechanics and Pneumatics in the Classical World’, in Keyser, P. T. and Scarborough, J., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World (Oxford), 337–59Google Scholar

Rocca, J. 2003. Galen on the Brain: Anatomical Knowledge and Physiological Speculation in the Second Century ad (Leiden).Google Scholar

Roby, C. 2016. Technical Ekphrasis in Greek and Roman Science and Literature (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Russo, L. 2004. The Forgotten Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 bc and Why It Had to Be Reborn (transl. S. Levy) (Berlin).Google Scholar

Scharle, M. 2015. ‘“And These Things Follow”: Teleology, Necessity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Meteorologica’, in Ebrey, D., ed., Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science (Cambridge), 79–99.Google Scholar

Schiefsky, M. J. 2007. ‘Art and Nature in Ancient Mechanics’, in Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Newman, W. R., eds., The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity (Cambridge, MA), 67–108.Google Scholar

Schironi, F. 2018. The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad (Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2017. ‘Socrates, Darwin, and Teleology’, in Rocca, J., ed., Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches (Cambridge), 25–42.Google Scholar

Steiner, D. 2001. Images in Mind: Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar

Thomas, J. J. 2021. Art, Science, and the Natural World in the Ancient Mediterranean, 300 bc to ad 100 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Thumiger, C. 2017. A History of the Mind and Mental Health in Classical Greek Medical Thought (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. 2013. ‘Miracle and Natural Cause in Galen’, in Alkier, S. and Weissenrieder, A., eds., Miracles Revisited: New Testament Miracles Stories and their Concepts of Reality (Berlin), 102–14.Google Scholar

Tybjerg, K. 2003. ‘Wonder-Making and Philosophical Wonder in Hero of Alexandriaʼ, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 34: 443–66.Google Scholar

Van der Eijk, P. J. 2000. ‘Aristotle’s Psycho-physiological Account of the Body–Soul Relationship’, in Potter, P. and Wright, J. P., eds., Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind–Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment (Oxford), 57–78.CrossRef Google Scholar

Van der Eijk, P. J. 2005. Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity: Doctors and Philosophers on Nature, Soul, Health and Disease (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. 1993. ‘I nervi dell’ anima’, in Kollesch, J. and Nickel, D., eds., Galen und das Hellenistische Erbe: Verhandlungen des IV. Internationalen Galen-Symposiums (Stuttgart), 63–77.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. 1998. ‘Between Knowledge and Practice: Hellenistic Medicine’, in Grmek, M. D., ed., Western Medical Thought from Antiquity to the Middle Ages (transl. A. Shugaar) (Cambridge, MA), 72–103.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. 1999. ‘Historiographical Strategies in Galen’s Physiology’, in van der Eijk, P. J., ed., Ancient Histories of Medicine: Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity (Leiden), 383–95.Google Scholar

Vernant, J.-P. 1983. ‘Some Remarks on the Forms and Limitations of Technological Thought among the Greeks’, in Vernant, J.-P., Myth and Thought among the Greeks (transl. J. Lloyd) (London), 279–301.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1975. ‘Experiment and Experience in Hellenistic Medicine’, BICS, 22: 178–99.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1989. Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Edition, Translation and Essays (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1992. ‘The Discovery of the Body: Human Dissection and Its Cultural Contexts in Ancient Greece’, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 65: 223–41.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1996. ‘Body and Machine: Interactions Between Medicine, Mechanics, and Philosophy in Early Alexandria’, in Walsh, J. and Reese, T. F., eds., Alexandria and Alexandrianism (Malibu, CA), 85–106.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1997. ‘Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Anatomy’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S., eds., Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart), 183–208.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1998. ‘Andréas de Caryste et Philon de Byzance: médecine et mécanique à Alexandrie’, in Argoud, G. and Guillaumin, J.-Y., eds., Sciences exactes et sciences appliquées à Alexandrie (Saint-Étienne), 147–72.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 2007. ‘Physis and Technē in Greek Medicine’, in Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Newman, W. R., eds., The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity (Cambridge, MA), 21–49.CrossRef Google Scholar

Walker, J. 2000. ‘Pathos and Katharsis in “Aristotelian” Rhetoric: Some Implications’, in Gross, A. G. and Walzer, A. E., eds., Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric (Carbondale, IL), 74–92.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. 2011. Narrative and Identity in the Ancient Greek Novel: Returning Romance (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Wilson, A. I. 2008. ‘Machines in Greek and Roman Technology’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 337–66.Google Scholar

Witt, C. 2015. ‘In Defense of the Craft Analogy: Artifacts and Natural Teleology’, in Leunissen, M., ed., Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge), 107–20.Google Scholar

Carra de Vaux, B. 1902. Le livre des appareils pneumatiques et des machines hydrauliques par Philon de Byzance (Paris).Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. 1984. Galen on the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato (Galeni de placitis Hippocratis et Platonis), translated by Phillip de Lacy. Vol. 2, books vi–ix (Berlin).Google Scholar

Diels, H. A. 1893. “Über das physikalische System des Straton,” Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1: 101–127.Google Scholar

Drachmann, A. G. 1948. Ktesibios, Philon and Heron: A Study in Ancient Pneumatics (Copenhagen).Google Scholar

Duff, A. M. 1934. Minor Latin Poets, Vol. 1. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Garofalo, I. 1988. Erasistrati Fragmenta (Pisa).Google Scholar

Giocondo, G., 1513. Vitruvius: De architectura libri x iterum et Frontinus à Iocundi revisi repurgatique quantum ex collatione licuit (Florence).Google Scholar

Hine, H. M. 1996. “Aetna,” in Hornblower, S. and Spawforth, A., eds., The Oxford Classical Dictionary (Oxford), 31.Google Scholar

Hodge, T. A. 1983. “Siphons in Roman Aqueducts,” Papers of the British School at Rome, 51: 174–221.Google Scholar

Hodge, T. A. 2005. Roman Aqueducts & Water Supply (London).Google Scholar

Lonie, I. M. 1973a. “The Paradoxical Text ‘On the Heart.’ Part 1,” Medical History, 17 (1): 1–15.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lonie, I. M. 1973b. “The Paradoxical Text ‘On the Heart.’ Part 2,” Medical History, 17 (2): 136–153.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marsden, E. W. 1971. Greek and Roman Artillery: Technical Treatises (Oxford).Google Scholar

Oleson, J. P. 1984. Greek and Roman Mechanical Water-Lifting Devices: The History of a Technology (Toronto).Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. 2016. The Sublime in Antiquity (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Prager, F. D. 1974. Philo of Byzantium: Pneumatica (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar

Rackham, H. 1952. Pliny: Natural History (reprint 1983) (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Rowland, I. D., Howe, T. N., and Dewar, M. J., eds. 1999. Vitruvius: Ten Books on Architecture, 10 vols. (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Russo, L. 2004. The Forgotten Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 bc and Why It Had to Be Reborn (Berlin).CrossRef Google Scholar

Schiefsky, M. 2015. “Technē and Method in Ancient Artillery Construction: The Belopoeica of Philo of Byzantium,” in Brooke, H. and Fischer, K. D., eds., The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden (Berlin), 613–651.Google Scholar

Scott, S. P., ed. 1932. The Civil Law, including the Twelve Tables: The Institutes of Gaius, the Rules of Ulpian, the Opinions of Paulus, the Enactments of Justinian, and the Constitutions of Leo. Translated from the Original Latin, Edited, and Compared with All Accessible Systems of Jurisprudence Ancient and Modern, 17 vols. (Cincinnati).Google Scholar

Setaioli, A. 2015. “Seneca and the Ancient World,” in Bartsch, S. and Schiesaro, A., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Seneca (Cambridge), 255–265.Google Scholar

Valleriani, M. 2016. “Hydrostatics and Pneumatics in Antiquity,” in Irby, G. L., ed., A Companion to Science, Technology and Medicine in Ancient Greece and Rome (Hoboken, NJ), 145–160.Google Scholar

Valleriani, M. 2017. “The Epistemology of Practical Knowledge,” in Valleriani, M., ed., Structures of Practical Knowledge (Dordrecht), 1–19.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1973. “The Alexandrians,” in Harris, C. R. S., ed., The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine: From Alcmaeon to Galen (Oxford), 177–233.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1990. “Cardiovascular Puzzles in Erasistratus and Herophilus,” in Bernabeo, R., ed., Atti del xxxi Congresso Internazionale di Storia della Medicina (Bologna, 30 agosto – 4 settembre 1988) (Bologna), 385–391.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1997. “Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Medicine,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S., eds., Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Akten des Symposions über Aristoteles’ Biologie vom 24.–28. Juli 1995 in der Werner-Reimers-Stiftung in Bad Homburg (Wiesbaden), 183–208.Google Scholar

Webster, C. 2014. “Technology and/as Theory: Material Thinking in Ancient Science and Medicine.” Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Columbia.Google Scholar

Whitehead, D. 2010. Apollodorus Mechanicus: Siege-Matters (Poliorkētika) (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Wikander, , Ö., ed. 2000. Handbook of Ancient Water Technology (Leiden).Google Scholar

Woodcroft, B. 1851. The Pneumatics of Hero of Alexandria (London).Google Scholar

Balme, D.M. and Gotthelf, A., 2002. Aristotle: ‘Historia Animalium’ (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Berryman, S. 2007. ‘Teleology without Tears: Aristotle and the Role of Mechanistic Conceptions of Organisms’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 37.3: 351–69.Google Scholar

Boylan, M. 1982. ‘The Digestive and “Circulatory” Systems in Aristotle’s Biology’, Journal of the History of Biology, 15.1: 89–118.Google Scholar PubMed

Boylan, M. 2015. The Origins of Ancient Greek Science: Blood. A Philosophical Study (New York).Google Scholar

Brock, A. J. ed. 1916. Galen: On the Natural Faculties (Cambridge, MA) (reprint, 2006).Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V., A. Pietrobelli, 2005. ‘Galien ressuscité : édition princeps du texte grec du De propriis placitis’, Revue des Études Grecques, 118: 168–213.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. 2015. ‘Faculties in Ancient Philosophy’, in Perler, D., ed., The Faculties: A History (Oxford), 19–58.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. 1978–1984. Galen: On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato (Berlin).Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. 1988. ‘The Third Part of the Soul’, in Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M., eds., Le opere psicologiche di Galeno: atti del terzo Colloquio galenico internazionale, Pavia, 10–12 settembre 1986 (Naples), 43–63.Google Scholar

Debru, A. 2008. ‘Physiology’, in Hankinson, R. J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Galen (Cambridge), 263–82.Google Scholar

Duckworth, W. H. L., Lyons, M. C. and Towers, B.. 1962. Galen on Anatomical Procedures: The Later Books (Cambridge) (reprint, 2010).Google Scholar

Dyce, K., Sack, W. O. and Wensing, C. J. G.. 2010. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy (4th ed.). (St Louis).Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. and Wilkie, J. S.. 1984. Galen on Respiration and the Arteries (Princeton).Google Scholar

Garofalo, I., ed. 1986–2000. Galeni anatomicarum administrationum libri qui supersunt novem. 2 vols. (Napoli).Google Scholar

Gärtner, F., ed. 2015. Galeni De locis affectis i–ii. CMG v 6,1,1 (Berlin).Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2012. Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford).Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2015. ‘Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology’, in Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D., eds., The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden (Berlin), 139–74.Google Scholar

Gundert, B., ed. 2009. Galeni De symptomatum differentiis. CMG v 5,1 (Berlin).Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., ed. 2008. The Cambridge Companion to Galen (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 2014. ‘Galen and the Ontology of Powers’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22.5: 951–73.Google Scholar

Harari, O. 2016. ‘Alexander against Galen on Motion: A Mere Logical Debate?’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 50: 201–36.Google Scholar

Harris, C. R. S. 1973. The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine: From Alcmaeon to Galen (Oxford).Google Scholar

Helmreich, G., ed. 1904. Galeni De temperamentis libri tres (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Helmreich, G. 1907–9. Galeni De usu partium libri xvii. 2 vols. (Leipzig) (reprint, Amsterdam, 1968).Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2017. ‘Aristotelian Mechanistic Explanation’, in Rocca, J., ed., Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Kühn, C. G., ed. 1821–33. Claudii Galeni opera omnia. 22 vos. (Leipzig) (reprint, Cambridge, 2011).Google Scholar

Lewis, O. 2017. Praxagoras of Cos on Arteries, Pulse and Pneuma: Fragments and Interpretation (Leiden).Google Scholar

Littré, É., ed. 1861. Oeuvres completes d’Hippocrate, vol. 9 (Paris)Google Scholar

Marechal, P. 2020. ‘Reflection 1: Teleology and Function in Galenic Anatomy’, in McDonough, J. K., ed., Teleology: A History (Oxford), 64–70.Google Scholar

May, M. 1968. Galen: On the Usefulness of Parts of the Body. 2 vols. (Ithaca).Google Scholar

Meyer-Steineg, T. 1913. ‘Studien zur Physiologie des Galenos’, Archiv Für Geschichte Der Medizin, 6.6: 417–48.Google Scholar

Rocca, J. 2003. Galen on the Brain: Anatomical Knowledge and Physiological Speculation in the Second Century ad (Leiden).Google Scholar

Rocca, J. 2020. ‘Galen on Pneuma: Between Metaphysical Speculation and Anatomical Theory’, in Coughlin, S., Leith, D. and Lewis, O., eds., The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle (Berlin), 283–312.Google Scholar

Schiefsky, M. J. 2007. ‘Galen’s Teleology and Functional Explanation’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 33: 369–400.Google Scholar

Schiefsky, M. J. 2012. ‘Galen and the Tripartite Soul’, in Barney, R., Brennan, T. and Brittain, C., eds., Plato and the Divided Self (Cambridge), 331–49.Google Scholar

Siegel, R. E. 1968. Galen’s System of Physiology and Medicine: An Analysis of His Doctrines and Observations on Bloodflow, Respiration, Humors and Internal Diseases (Basel).Google Scholar

Simon, M. 1906. Sieben Bucher Anatomie des Galen, 2 vols. (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Singer, P. N. and van der Eijk, P. J., eds. 2019. Galen: Works on Human Nature, vol. 1: Mixtures (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Van der Eijk, P. J, 2014. ‘Galen on the Nature of Human Beings’, in Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J., eds., Philosophical Themes in Galen (Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 114) (London), 89–134.Google Scholar

Van der Eijk, P. J 2015. ‘Galen on the Assessment of Bodily Mixtures’, in Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D., eds., The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden (Berlin), 675–98.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1997. ‘Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Medicine’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S., eds., Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse: Akten des Symposions über Aristoteles’ Biologie vom 24.–28. Juli 1995 in der Werner-Reimers-Stiftung in Bad Homburg (Wiesbaden), 183–208.Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 2002. ‘Body, Soul, and Nerves: Epicurus, Herophilus, Erasistratus, the Stoics, and Galen’, in Wright, J. P and Potter, P., eds., Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind–Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment (Oxford).Google Scholar

Trompeter, J. 2018. ‘The Actions of Spirit and Appetite: Voluntary Motion in Galen’, Phronesis, 63.2: 176–207.Google Scholar

Visible Body: Human Anatomy Atlas. 2017. Version 2017.2.08 [Computer Software], Argosy Publishing.Google Scholar

Berrey, M. 2017. Hellenistic Science at Court (Berlin).Google Scholar

Blåsjö, V. and Hogendijk, J. P, 2018. “On Translating Mathematics,” Isis, 109.4: 774–781.Google Scholar

Bravo, B. 2007. “Antiquarianism and History,” in Marincola, J., ed., A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, 2 vols. (Malden, MA), 2.515–527.Google Scholar

Bresadola, M. 2018. “The Problems of Anatomica Practica and How to Solve Them: Pathological Dissection around 1700,” in De Renzi, S., Bresadola, M., and Conforti, M., eds., Pathology in Practice: Diseases and Dissections in Early Modern Europe (London), 56–75.Google Scholar

Burke, P. 2007. “Lost (and Found) in Translation: A Cultural History of Translators and Translating in Early Modern Europe,” European Review, 15.1: 83–94.Google Scholar

Capitani, U. 1974. “Il recupero di un passo di Celso in un codice del De Medicina conservato a Toledo,” Maia, 26: 161–212.Google Scholar

de Certeau, M. 1988. The Practice of Everyday Life, transl. S. Rendell (Berkeley).Google Scholar

Conde Parrado, P. P. 2003. Hipócrates Latino: El De Medicina de Cornelio Celso en el Renacimiento (Valladolid).Google Scholar

Conde Parrado, P. P. 2008. “‘Por el orden de Celso’: aspectos de la influencia del De medicina en la cirugía europea del Renacimiento,” Dynamis: Acta Hispanica ad Medicinae Scientiarumque Historiam Illustrandam 28: 217–241.Google Scholar

Cunningham, A. 2010. The Anatomist Anatomis’d: An Experimental Discipline in Enlightenment Europe (Farnham).Google Scholar

Daston, L. and Most, G.. 2015. “History of Science and History of Philologies,” Isis, 106.2: 378–390.Google Scholar

Ellis, H. 1969. A History of Bladder Stone (Oxford).Google Scholar

Fischer, K.-D. 1994. “Der Artz Johann Friedrich Clossius (1735–1787): Leben und Werk eines Celsusliebhabers im Zeitalter der Aufklärung,” in Mudry, P. and Sabbah, G., eds., La Médecine de Celse: aspects historiques, scientifiques et littéraires (Sainte-Étienne), 359–371.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception, transl. A. M. Sheridan (London).Google Scholar

Gautherie, A. 2017. Rhétorique et thérapeutique dans le De Medicina de Celse (Turnhout).Google Scholar

Hoffmann, F. 1734. Medicinae Rationalis Systematicae Tomi Quarti: quo specialis morborum pathologia et huic superstructa solida therapia cum medendi methodo cautelis clinicis et morborum enarrationibus adiuncta epicrisi exhibentur: pars secunda doctrinam haemorrhagiarum et dolorum perspicua et demonstrativa methodo tradens (Halle).Google Scholar

Jarcho, S. 1984. The Clinical Consultations of Giambattista Morgagni (Boston).Google Scholar

Lo Presti, R. 2014. “La place d’Hippocrate dans les grandes querelles médicales du xviie siècle: le cas du débat sur la circulation sanguine,” in Jouanna, J. and Zink, M., eds., Hippocrate et les hippocratismes: médecine, religion, société. xive Colloque International Hippocratique (Paris), 461–482.Google Scholar

Lonie, I. 1981. “Hippocrates the Iatromechanist,” Medical History, 25: 113–150.Google Scholar

Maire, B. 1994. “Proposition d’un nouveau ‘stemma codicum’ de la tradition manuscrite du ‘De medicina’ d’Aulus Cornelius Celsus,” in Vázquez Buján, M. E., ed., Tradición e innovación de la medicina latina de la Antigüedad y de la Alta Edad Media (Santiago de Compostela), 87–99.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. 1993. Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Marx, F. 1915. A. Corneli Celsi quae supersunt (Berlin).Google Scholar

Morgagnus, J. B. 1762–1765. Opera Omnia in Quinque Tomos Divisa, 5 vols. (Venice).Google Scholar

Müller, I. W. 1991. Iatromechanische Theorie und ärztliche Praxis (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Najman, H. 2017. “Ethical Reading: The Transformation of the Text and the Self,” Journal of Theological Studies, 68.2: 507–529.Google Scholar

Nardo, D. 1981. “Scienza e filologia nel primo Settecento padovano. Gli studi classici di G.B. Morgagni, G. Poleni, G. Pontedera, L. Targa,” Quaderni per Storia dell‘Università di Padova, 14: 1–40.Google Scholar

Netz, R. 2021. “The Problematic Greek Miracle,” Syllecta Classica, 31: 1–37.Google Scholar

Nicholson, M. 1992. “Giovanni Battista Morgagni and Eighteenth-Century Physical Examination,” in Lawrence, C., ed., Medical Theory, Surgical Practices: Studies in the History of Surgery (London), 101–134.Google Scholar

Pearle, M., Antonelli, J., and Lotan, Y.. 2016. “Urinary Lithiasis: Etiology, Epidemiology, and Pathogenesis,” in Wein, A. J., Kavoussi, L. R., Partin, A. W., and Peters, C., eds., Campbell-Walsh Urology, 11th ed. (Philadelphia), 1170–1199.Google Scholar

Ratcliffe, J. F. 2013. ‘The De Medicina, Cornelius Celsus and Surgery in the First Century ce’, unpublished PhD thesis (University of Queensland).Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. 2019. Mosaics of Knowledge: Representing Information in the Roman World (Oxford).Google Scholar

Rojouan, J. 1997. “Huit lettres ‘In Celsum’: Morgagni – médecin et philologue,” 2 vols. PhD thesis (University of Nantes).Google Scholar

Scheller, E. and Frieboes, W.. 1906. Aulus Cornelius Celsus: Über die Arzneiwissenschaft in acht Bücher 2nd ed. (Braunschweig).Google Scholar

Stolberg, M. 2016. “Epilogue: Approaches to the History of Patients: From the Ancient World to Early Modern Europe,” in Petridou, G. and Thumiger, C., eds., Homo Patiens: Approaches to the Patient in the Ancient World (Leiden) 497–518.Google Scholar

Timpanaro, S. 2005. The Genesis of Lachmann’s Method, transl. G. Most (Chicago).Google Scholar

Trovato, P. 2014. Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lachmann’s Method: A Non-Standard Handbook of Genealogical Textual Criticism in the Age of Post-Structuralism, Cladistics, and Copy-Text, transl. F. Poole (Padua).Google Scholar

West, M. L. 1973. Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique Applicable to Greek and Latin Texts (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Zampieri, F. 2016. Il metodo anatomo-clinico fra meccanicismo ed empirismo: Marcello Malpighi, Antonio Maria Valsalva et Giovanni Battista Morgagni (Rome).Google Scholar

Des Chene, D. 2001. Spirits and Clocks: Machine and Organism in Descartes (Ithaca).Google Scholar

Distelzweig, P. 2015. ‘The Use of Usus and the Function of Functio: Teleology and Its Limits in Descartes’ Physiology’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53: 377–99.Google Scholar

Garber, D. 2013. ‘Remarks on the Pre-history of the Mechanical Philosophy’, in Garber, D. and Roux, S., eds., The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy (Dordrecht), 3–26.Google Scholar

Kakoudaki, D. 2014. Anatomy of a Robot: Literature, Cinema, and the Cultural Work of Artificial People (New Brunswick).Google Scholar

Landes, B. J. 2011. ‘Vaucanson’s Automata as Devices of Enlightenment’, Sjuttonhundratal, 8: 50–9.Google Scholar

Riskin, J. 2003. ‘The Defecating Duck, or, The Ambiguous Origins of Artificial Life’, Critical Inquiry, 29: 599–633.Google Scholar

Riskin, J. 2016. The Restless Clock: A History of Centuries-Long Argument over What Makes Living Things Tick (Chicago).Google Scholar

Roux, S. 2018. ‘From the Mechanical Philosophy to Early Modern Mechanisms’, in Glennan, S. and Illari, P., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy (New York), 26–45.Google Scholar

Shapiro, L. 2003. ‘The Health of the Body-Machine? Or, Seventeenth Century Mechanism and the Concept of Health’, Perspectives on Science, 11: 421–42.Google Scholar

Snider, A. 2000. ‘Cartesian Bodies’, Modern Philology, 98: 299–319.Google Scholar

Vaccari, A. 2008. ‘Legitimating the Machine: The Epistemological Foundation of Technological Metaphors in the Natural Philosophy of René Descartes’, Oeuvres Complètes d’Hippocrate, Emile Littré (Paris). in Zittel, C., Engel, G., Nanni, R., and Karafyllis, N. C., eds., Philosophies of Technology: Francis Bacon and His Contemporaries (Leiden), 287–336.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part III - Towards the Mechanization of the Human Body

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Book contents

Part III - Towards the Mechanization of the Human Body

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive