Book contents
- Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity
- Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- An Introduction to Body–Machine Intersections
- Part I Blended Bodies
- Part II The Technological Body
- Part III Towards the Mechanization of the Human Body
- Index of Passages
- General Index
- References
An Introduction to Body–Machine Intersections
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2023
Book contents
- Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity
- Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- An Introduction to Body–Machine Intersections
- Part I Blended Bodies
- Part II The Technological Body
- Part III Towards the Mechanization of the Human Body
- Index of Passages
- General Index
- References
Summary
*In December 2018, a group of archaeologists, philosophers, historians and classicists came together at the University of Cyprus to discuss body–machine interactions in Greek and Roman antiquity. The idea for this volume has grown from that conversation. We would like to thank the University of Cyprus and the Department of Classics there for their support.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity , pp. 1 - 16Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Aho, J. and Aho, K. 2008. Body Matters: A Phenomenology of Sickness, Disease, and Illness (Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
Althoff, J. 1997. ‘Vom Schicksal einer Metapher: Die Erde als Organismus in Senecas Naturales Quaestiones’, in Döring, K., Herzhoff, B., and Wöhrle, G, eds., Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption, vol. 7 (Trier), 95–110.Google Scholar
Anderson, M., Cairns, D. and Sprevak, M., eds. 2018. Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity (Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Newman, W. R.. 2007. ‘Introduction: The Artificial and the Natural: State of the Problem’, in Bensaude, B. and Newman, W. R., eds., The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity (Cambridge, MA), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, S. 2009. The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, S. 2020. ‘Ancient Greek Mechanics and the Mechanical Hypothesis’, in Taub, L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek and Roman Science (Cambridge), 229–47.Google Scholar
Bianchi, E., Brill, S. and Holmes, B., eds. 2019. Antiquities Beyond Humanism (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canevaro, L. 2019. ‘Materiality and Classics: (Re-)Turning to the Material’, Journal of Hellenic Studies, 139: 222–32.Google Scholar
Chesi, G. M. and Spiegel, F., eds. 2020. Classical Literature and Posthumanism (London).Google Scholar
Cohen, W. A. 2003. ‘Deep Skin’, in Cohen, J. J. and Weiss, G., eds., Thinking the Limits of the Body (Albany, NY), 63–82.Google Scholar
De Groot, J. 2014. Aristotle’s Empiricism: Experience and Mechanics in the Fourth Century bc (Las Vegas).Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1974. ‘White Mythology: Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy’, New Literary History, 6: 5–74.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., Bowdie, B, Wolff, P, and Boronat, C. 2001. ‘Metaphor Is Like Analogy’ in Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., and Kokinov, B. N., eds., The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA), 99–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grmek, M. D. 1972. ‘A Survey of the Mechanical Interpretations of Life from the Greek Atomists to the Followers of Descartes’ in Breck, A. D. and Yourgrau, W., eds., Biology, History, and Natural Philosophy (Boston), 181–95.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2010. The Symptom and the Subject: The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece (Princeton, NJ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. 2018. ‘Body’, in Pormann, P. E., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hippocrates (Cambridge), 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, M. 2011. Sublime Dreams of Living Machines: The Automaton in the European Imagination (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
King, H. 2013. ‘Female Fluids in the Hippocratic Corpus: How Solid Was the Humoral Body?’, in Horden, P. and Hsu, E., eds., The Body in Balance: Humoral Medicines in Practice (New York), 25–52.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. T. 1997. ‘Aristotle on Metaphor’, American Journal of Philology, 118: 517–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Lo Presti, R. 2008. ‘La notion d’automaton dans les textes médicaux (Hippocrate et Galien) et la Physique d’Aristote: hasard, spontanéité de la nature, et téléologie du comme si’, in Fischer, K. D., ed., 30 Jahre Arbeitskreis Alte Medizin in Mainz: Beiträge der Tagung 2010, special issue of Les Etudes Classiques, 80: 25–54.Google Scholar
Mayor, A. 2018. Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines, and Ancient Dreams of Technology (Princeton, NJ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, T. 2010. ‘Thinking Ecology: The Mesh, the Strange Stranger, and the Beautiful Soul’, Collapse, 6: 265–93.Google Scholar
Riskin, J. 2016. The Restless Clock: A History of the Centuries-Long Argument over What Makes Living Things Tick (Chicago).Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. J. 2007. ‘Art and Nature in Ancient Mechanics’, in Bensaude, B. and Newman, W. R., eds., The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity (Cambridge, MA), 67–108.Google Scholar
Sobchack, V. 2006. ‘A Leg to Stand On: Prosthetics, Metaphor, and Materiality’, in Smith, M. and Morra, J., eds., The Prosthetic Impulse: From a Posthuman Presence to a Biocultural Future (Cambridge, MA), 17–41.Google Scholar
Taub, L. 2012. ‘Physiological Analogies and Metaphors in Explanations of the Earth and the Cosmos’, in Horstmanshoff, M., King, H. and Zittel, C., eds., Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe (Leiden), 41–63.Google Scholar
Vaccari, A. 2012. ‘Dissolving Nature: How Descartes Made Us Posthuman’, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 16: 138–86.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 2006. Myth and Thought among the Greeks, transl. J. Lloyd and J. Fort (New York).Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1996. ‘Body and Machine: Interactions between Medicine, Mechanics, and Philosophy in Early Alexandria’, in Walsh, J. and Reese, T. F., eds., Alexandria and Alexandrianism (Malibu, CA), 85–106.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1997. ‘Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Anatomy’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S., eds., Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart), 183–208.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 1998. ‘Andréas de Caryste et Philon de Byzance: médecine et mécanique à Alexandrie’, in Argoud, G. and Guillaumin, J.-Y., eds., Sciences exactes et sciences appliquées à Alexandrie (Saint-Étienne), 147–72.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. 2007. ‘Physis and Technê in Greek Medicine’, in Bensaude, B. and Newman, W. R., eds., The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity (Cambridge, MA), 21–49.Google Scholar
Wee, J. Z., ed. 2017. The Comparable Body: Analogy and Metaphor in Ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian and Greco-Roman Medicine (Leiden).Google Scholar
White, R. 2010. Talking About God: The Concept of Analogy and the Problem of Religious Language (Farnham).Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. T. 2016. Materialism: A Historico-Philosophical Introduction (Dordrecht).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, C. T. 2017. ‘Varieties of Vital Materialism’, in Zammito, J. and Ellenzweig, S., eds., The New Politics of Materialism: History, Philosophy, Science (London), 44–65.Google Scholar