References

Giuseppe Fusco; Alessandro Minelli

doi:10.1017/9781108758970.012

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 September 2019

Giuseppe Fusco and

Alessandro Minelli

Show author details

Giuseppe Fusco: Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
Alessandro Minelli: Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Biology of Reproduction , pp. 415 - 436

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108758970.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aanen, D., Beekman, M. & Kokko, H. (eds.) (2016). Weird sex: the underappreciated diversity of sexual reproduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371 (1706).Google Scholar

Abbott, J. K., Norde, A. K. & Hansson, B. (2017). Sex chromosome evolution: historical insights and future perspectives. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 284: 20162806.Google Scholar

Ackermann, M., Stearns, S. & Jenal, U. (2003). Senescence in a bacterium with asymmetric division. Science, 300: 1920.Google Scholar

Adamson, M. & Ludwig, D. (1993). Oedipal mating as a factor in sex allocation in haplodiploids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 341: 195–202.Google Scholar

Adamson, M. L. (1989). Evolutionary biology of the Oxyurida (Nematoda): biofacies of a haplodiploid taxon. Advances in Parasitology, 28: 175–228.Google Scholar

Adler, L. & Jarms, G. (2009). New insights into reproductive traits of scyphozoans: special methods of propagation in Sanderia malayensis Goette, 1886 (Pelagiidae, Semaeostomeae) enable establishing a new classification of asexual reproduction in the class Scyphozoa. Marine Biology, 156: 1411–1420.Google Scholar

Adolfsson, S., Michalakis, Y., Paczesniak, D. et al. (2010). Evaluation of elevated ploidy and asexual reproduction as alternative explanations for geographic parthenogenesis in Eucypris virens ostracods. Evolution, 64: 986–997.Google Scholar

Agrawal, A. F. (2001). Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature, 411: 692–695.Google Scholar

Agrawal, S. C. (2012). Factors controlling induction of reproduction in algae – review: the text. Folia Microbiologica, 57: 387–407.Google Scholar

Aisenberg, A. & Peretti, A. V. (2011). Sexual dimorphism in immune response, fat reserve and muscle mass in a sex role reversed spider. Zoology, 114: 272–275.Google Scholar

Ajzenberg, D., Bañuls, A. L., Su, C. et al. (2004). Genetic diversity, clonality and sexuality in Toxoplasma gondii. International Journal of Parasitology, 34: 1185–1196.Google Scholar

Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J. et al. (2015). Molecular Biology of the Cell, 6th edn. New York, NY: Garland Science.Google Scholar

Alby, K., Schaefer, D. & Bennett, R. J. (2009). Homothallic and heterothallic mating in the opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans. Nature, 460: 890–893.Google Scholar

Alcock, J. (2013). Animal Behavior: an Evolutionary Approach, 10th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Andrade, M. C. B. (1996). Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian redback spider. Science, 271: 70–72.Google Scholar

Archibald, J. M., Simpson, A. G. B. & Slamovits, C. H. (eds.) (2017). Handbook of the Protists. Cham: Springer International.Google Scholar

Arnold, A. P. (2012). The end of gonad-centric sex determination in mammals. Trends in Genetics, 28: 55–61.Google Scholar

Aron, S., de Menten, L., Van Bockstaele, D. R., Blank, S. M. & Roisin, Y. (2005). When hymenopteran males reinvented diploidy. Current Biology, 15: 824–827.Google Scholar

Arroyo, M. T. K. & Uslar, P. (1993). Breeding systems in a temperate Mediterranean-type climate montane sclerophyllous forest in central Chile. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 111: 83–102.Google Scholar

Asplen, M. K., Whitefield, J. B., De Boer, J. G. & Heimpel, G. E. (2009). Ancestral state reconstruction analysis of hymenopteran sex determination mechanisms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22: 1762–1769.Google Scholar

Avise, J. C. (2008). Clonality: the Genetics, Ecology and Evolution of Sexual Abstinence in Vertebrate Animals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Avise, J. C. (2011). Hermaphroditism: a Primer on the Biology, Ecology, and Evolution of Dual Sexuality. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bachtrog, D., Kirkpatrick, M., Mank, J. E. et al. (2011). Are all sex chromosomes created equal? Trends in Genetics, 27: 350–357.Google Scholar

Balon, E. K. (1975). Reproductive guilds in fishes: a proposal and definition. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 32: 821–864.Google Scholar

Balon, E. K. (1984). Patterns in the evolution of reproductive styles in fishes. In Fish Reproduction: Strategies and Tactics, ed. Potts, G. W. & Wootton, R. J.. London: Academic Press, pp. 35–53.Google Scholar

Barske, L. A. & Capel, B. (2010). Sex determination: an avian sexual revolution. Nature, 464: 171–172.Google Scholar

Bauer, R. T. (1986). Sex change and life history pattern in the shrimp Thor manningi (Decapoda: Caridea): a novel case of partial protandric hermaphroditism. Biological Bulletin, 170: 11–31.Google Scholar

Bauer, R. T. (2000). Simultaneous hermaphroditism in caridean shrimps: a unique and puzzling sexual system in the Decapoda. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 20 (Special Number 2): 116–128.Google Scholar

Bauer, R. T. & Newman, W. A. (2004). Protandric simultaneous hermaphroditism in the marine shrimp Lysmata californica (Caridea: Hippolytidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology, 24: 131–139.Google Scholar

Baurain, D., Brinkmann, H., Petersen, J. et al. (2010). Phylogenomic evidence for separate acquisition of plastids in cryptophytes, haptophytes, and stramenopiles. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27: 1698–1709.Google Scholar

Bell, G. (1980). The costs of reproduction and their consequences. American Naturalist, 116: 45–76.Google Scholar

Bell, G. (1982). The Masterpiece of Nature: the Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Bell, G. (1988). Sex and Death in Protozoa: the History of an Obsession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, G. & Praiss, M. (1986). Optimality and constraint in a self-fertilized alga. Evolution, 40: 194–198.Google Scholar

Benazzi, M. & Benazzi Lentati, G. (1992). Pseudogamy (gynogenesis) in planarians: annotations some forty years on. In Sex: Origin and Evolution, ed. Dallai, R.. Selected Symposia and Monographs U.Z.I., 6. Modena: Mucchi, pp. 87–102.Google Scholar

Beukeboom, L. W. & Perrin, N. (2014). The Evolution of Sex Determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Beukeboom, L. W. & van de Zande, L. (2010). Genetics of sex determination in the haplodiploid wasp Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Journal of Genetics, 89: 333–339.Google Scholar

Beukeboom, L. W. & Vrijenhoek, R. C. (1998). Evolutionary genetics and ecology of sperm-dependent parthenogenesis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 11: 755–782.Google Scholar

Beukeboom, L. W., Weinzierl, R. P., Reed, K. M. & Michiels, N. K. (1996). Distribution and origin of chromosomal races in the freshwater planarian Dugesia polychroa (Turbellaria: Tricladida). Hereditas, 124: 7–15.Google Scholar

Bewley, J. D., Bradford, K. J., Hilhorst, H. W. M. & Nonogaki, H. (2013). Seeds: Physiology of Development, Germination and Dormancy. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Bickel, R. D., Cleveland, H. C., Barkas, J. et al. (2013). The pea aphid uses a version of the terminal system during oviparous, but not viviparous, development. EvoDevo, 4: 10.Google Scholar

Biddle, F. G., Eden, S. A., Rossler, J. S. & Eales, B. A. (1997). Sex and death in the mouse: genetically delayed reproduction and senescence. Genome, 40: 229–235.Google Scholar

Birkhead, T. R., Hosken, D. J. & Pitnick, S. S. (eds.) (2008). Sperm Biology: an Evolutionary Perspective. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bode, S. N., Adolfsson, S., Lamatsch, D. K. et al. (2010). Exceptional cryptic diversity and multiple origins of parthenogenesis in a freshwater ostracod. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 54: 542–552.Google Scholar

Bogart, J., Bi, K., Fu, J., Noble, D. W. A. & Niedzwiecki, J. (2007). Unisexual salamanders (genus Ambystoma) present a new reproductive mode for eukaryotes. Genome, 50: 119–136.Google Scholar

Boldrin, F., Martinucci, G., Holland, L. Z., Miller, R. L. & Burighel, P. (2009). Internal fertilization in the salp Thalia democratica. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 87: 928–940.Google Scholar

Bonner, J. T. (2000). First Signals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bonnet, X. (2011). The evolution of semelparity. In Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Snakes, ed. Aldridge, R. D., Jellen, B. C., Siegel, D. S. & Wisniewski, S. S.. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers, pp. 645–672.Google Scholar

Boschetti, C., Leasi, F. & Ricci, C. (2011). Developmental stages in diapausing eggs: an investigation across monogonont rotifer species. Hydrobiologia, 662: 149–155.Google Scholar

Bossinger, G., Spokevicius, A. V. (2011). Plant chimaeras and mosaics. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS). Chichester: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0002090.pub2.Google Scholar

Bouillon, J., Gravili, C., Pagès, F., Gili, J.-M. & Boero, F. (2006). An Introduction to Hydrozoa. Mémoires du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 194. Paris: Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle.Google Scholar

Bourlière, F. (1964). The Natural History of Mammals, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar

Bowman, J. L., Sakakibara, K., Furumizu, C. & Dierschke, T. (2016). Evolution in the cycles of life. Annual Review of Genetics, 50: 133–154.Google Scholar

Boyden, A. (1950). Is parthenogenesis sexual or asexual reproduction? Nature, 166: 820.Google Scholar

Bradbury, J. W. & Vehrencamp, S. L. (2011). Principles of Animal Communication, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, J. W. S., Baker, R., Lisk, J. C. (1983). Separate orientation and releaser components in a sex pheromone. Nature, 304: 265–267.Google Scholar

Brakefield, P. M. & Zwaan, B. J. (2011). Seasonal polyphenisms and environmentally induced plasticity in the Lepidoptera – the coordinated evolution of many traits on multiple levels. In Mechanisms of Life History Evolution, ed. Flatt, T. & Heyland, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 243–252.Google Scholar

Brien, P. (1973). Les démosponges: morphologie et reproduction. In Traité de Zoologie, 3 (1), ed. Grassé, P. P.. Paris: Masson, pp. 133–461.Google Scholar

Brown, F. D. & Swalla, B. J. (2012). Evolution and development of budding by stem cells: ascidian coloniality as a case study. Developmental Biology, 369: 151–162.Google Scholar

Bubley, W. J. & Pashuk, O. (2010). Life history of a simultaneously hermaphroditic fish, Diplectrum formosum. Journal of Fish Biology, 77: 676–691.Google Scholar

Buckley, D., Alcobendas, M., García-París, M. & Wake, M. H. (2007). Heterochrony, cannibalism, and the evolution of viviparity in Salamandra salamandra. Evolution and Development, 9: 105–115.Google Scholar

Bull, J. J. (1983). Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar

Bull, J. J. & Bulmer, M. G. (1981). The evolution of XY females in mammals. Heredity, 47: 347–365.Google Scholar

Burke, N. W. & Bonduriansky, R. (2017). Sexual conflict, facultative asexuality, and the true paradox of sex. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32: 646–652.Google Scholar

Buss, L. (1987). The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Butterfield, N. J. (2000). Bangiomorpha pubescens n. gen. n. sp.: implications for the evolution of sex, multicellularity and the Mesoproterozoic/Neoproterozoic radiation of eukaryotes. Paleobiology, 26: 386–404.Google Scholar

Casanova, J. P. (1985) Description de l’appareil génital primitif du genre Heterokrohnia et nouvelle classification des Chaetognathes. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences Paris, Série III, 301: 397–402.Google Scholar

Casselton, L. A. (2002). Mate recognition in fungi. Heredity, 88: 142–147.Google Scholar

Cavallin, M. (1971). La polyembryonie substitutive et la problème de l’origine de la lignée germinale chez le phasme Carausius morosus Br. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences Paris, 272: 462–465.Google Scholar

Cavicchioli, R. (ed.) (2007). Archaea: Molecular and Cellular Biology. Washington, DC: ASM Press.Google Scholar

Cellerino, A., Valenzano, D. R. & Reichard, M. (2016). From the bush to the bench: the annual Nothobranchius fishes as a new model system in biology. Biological Reviews, 91: 511–533.Google Scholar

Chang, E. S., Orive, M. E. & Cartwright, P. (2018). Nonclonal coloniality: genetically chimeric colonies through fusion of sexually produced polyps in the hydrozoan Ectopleura larynx. Evolution Letters, 2–4: 442–455.Google Scholar

Chaparro, O. R., Schmidt, A. J., Pardo, L. M. et al. (2011). Reproductive strategy of the semelparous clam Gaimardia bahamondei (Bivalvia, Gaimardiidae). Invertebrate Zoology, 130: 49–59.Google Scholar

Chapman, H., Houliston, G. J., Robson, B. & Iline, I. (2003). A case of reversal: the evolution and maintenance of sexuals from parthenogenetic clones in Hieracium pilosella. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164: 719–728.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, B. & Dempsey, N. D. (2001). A model of the evolution of the unusual sex chromosome system of Microtus oregoni. Heredity, 86: 387–394.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, D. (2002). Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes. Heredity, 88: 94–101.Google Scholar

Chemisquy, A. (2015). Peramorphic males and extreme sexual dimorphism in Monodelphis dimidiata (Didelphidae). Zoomorphology, 184: 587–599.Google Scholar

Chen, B. Y. & Henen, W. K. (1989). Evidence for spontaneous diploid androgenesis in Brassica napus L. Sexual Plant Reproduction, 2: 15–17.Google Scholar

Clark, J. R. (1983). Age-related changes in trees. Journal of Arboriculture, 9: 201–205.Google Scholar

Clark, W. R. (1996). Sex and the Origin of Death. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clifton, K. E. (1997). Mass spawning by green algae on coral reefs. Science, 275: 1116–1118.Google Scholar

Cohan, F. M. (1999). Genetic structure of prokaryotic populations. In Evolutionary Genetics: From Molecules to Morphology, ed. Singh, R. S. & Krimbas, C. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 475–489.Google Scholar

Cook, J. M. (2002). Sex determination in invertebrates. In Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods, ed. Hardy, I. C. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 178–194.Google Scholar

Cordaux, R., Bouchon, D. & Grève, P. (2011). The impact of endosymbionts on the evolution of host sex-determination mechanisms. Trends in Genetics, 27: 332–341.Google Scholar

Craig, S. F., Slobodkin, L. B., Wray, G. A. & Biermann, C. H. (1997). The ‘paradox’ of polyembryony: a review of the cases and a hypothesis for its evolution. Evolutionary Ecology, 11: 127–143.Google Scholar

Crespi, B. J. (1992). Cannibalism and trophic eggs in subsocial and eusocial insects. In Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution Among Diverse Taxa, ed. Elgar, M. & Crespi, B. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 176–213.Google Scholar

Cronberg, N., Natcheva, R. & Hedlund, K. (2006). Microarthropods mediate sperm transfer in mosses. Science, 313: 1255.Google Scholar

Dallai, R. (2014). Overview on spermatogenesis and sperm structure of Hexapoda. Arthropod Structure and Development, 43: 257–290.Google Scholar

Dallai, R., Gottardo, M., Mercati, D. et al. (2014). Giant spermatozoa and a huge spermatheca: a case of coevolution of male and female reproductive organs in the ground louse Zorotypus impolitus (Insecta, Zoraptera). Arthropod Structure and Development, 43: 135–151.Google Scholar

Danovaro, R., Dell’Anno, A., Pusceddu, A. et al. (2010). The first metazoa living in permanently anoxic conditions. BMC Biology, 8, 30.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races on the Struggle for Life. London: Murray.Google Scholar

de Meeûs, T., Prugnolle, F. & Agnew, P. (2007). Asexual reproduction: genetics and evolutionary aspects. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 64: 1355–1372.Google Scholar

de Reviers, B., Rousseau, F. & Silberfeld, T. (2015). Phaeophyceae. In Syllabus of Plant Families, 13th edn, ed. Frey, W.. Berlin; Stuttgart: Borntraeger, Vol. 2/1, pp. 139–176.Google Scholar

Deakin, J. E., Hore, T. A., Koina, E. & Graves, J. A. M. (2008). The status of dosage compensation in the multiple X chromosomes of the platypus. PLOS Genetics, 4 (7): e1000140.Google Scholar

Debortoli, N., Li, X., Eyres, I., Fontaneto, D., Hespeels, B., Tang, C. Q. et al. (2016). Genetic exchange among bdelloid rotifers is more likely due to horizontal gene transfer than to meiotic sex. Current Biology, 26: 723–732.Google Scholar

den Bakker, H. C., VanKuren, N. W., Morton, J. B. & Pawlowska, T. E. (2010). Clonality and recombination in the life history of an asexual arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27: 2474–2486.Google Scholar

Devlin, R. H. & Nagahama, Y. (2002). Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological and environmental influences. Aquaculture, 208: 191–364.Google Scholar

Dournon, C., Houillon, C. & Pieau, C. (1990). Temperature sex-reversal in amphibians and reptiles. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 34: 81–92.Google Scholar

Drago, L., Fusco, G., Garollo, E. & Minelli, A. (2011). Structural aspects of leg-to-gonopod metamorphosis in male helminthomorph millipedes (Diplopoda). Frontiers in Zoology, 8: 19.Google Scholar

Dreyer, N, Høeg, J. T., Hess, M. et al. (2017). When dwarf males and hermaphrodites copulate: First record of mating behaviour in a dwarf male using the androdioecious barnacle Scalpellum scalpellum (Crustacea: Cirripedia: Thoracica). Organisms Diversity and Evolution, 18: 115–123.Google Scholar

D’Souza, T. G. & Michiels, N. K. (2010). The costs and benefits of occasional sex: theoretical predictions and a case study. Journal of Heredity, 101: S34–S41.Google Scholar

Dupré, J. (2010). The polygenomic organism. The Sociological Review, 58 (Supplement 1): 19–31.Google Scholar

Dutrillaux, A. M., Pluot-Sigwalt, D. & Dutrillaux, B. (2010). (Ovo-)viviparity in the darkling beetle, Alegoria castelnaui (Tenebrioninae: Ulomini), from Guadeloupe. European Journal of Entomology, 107: 481–485.Google Scholar

Eisen, J. A., Coyne, R. S., Wu, M. et al. (2006). Macronuclear genome sequence of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, a model eukaryote. PLOS Biology, 4 (9): e286.Google Scholar

Ellegren, H. (2008). Sex chromosomes: platypus genome suggests a recent origin for the human X. Current Biology, 18: R557–R559.Google Scholar

Embley, T. M. (2006). Multiple secondary origins of the anaerobic lifestyle in eukaryotes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, 361: 1055–1067.Google Scholar

Erickson, J. W. & Quintero, J. J. (2007). Indirect effects of ploidy suggest X chromosome dose, not the X:A ratio, signals sex in Drosophila. PLOS Biology, 5 (12): e332.Google Scholar

Evans, J. P., Kelley, J. L., Bisazza, A., Finazzo, E. & Pilastro, A. (2004). Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 271: 2035–2042.Google Scholar

Evans, P. C., Lambert, N., Maloney, S. et al. (1999). Long-term fetal microchimerism in peripheral blood mononuclear cell subsets in healthy women and women with scleroderma. Blood, 93: 2033–2037.Google Scholar

Extavour, C. G. & Akam, M. (2003). Mechanisms of germ cell specification across the metazoans: epigenesis and preformation. Development, 130: 5869–5884.Google Scholar

Fahy, G. M. (2010). Precedents for the biological control of aging: experimental postponement, prevention, and reversal of aging processes. In The Future of Aging. Pathways to Human Life Extension, ed. Fahy, G. M.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 127–225.Google Scholar

Farrar, D. R. (1990). Species and evolution in asexually reproducing independent fern gametophytes. Systematic Botany, 15: 98–111.Google Scholar

Fautin, D. G. (1992). Cnidaria. In Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates, 5, ed. Adiyodi, K. G. & Adiyodi, R. G.. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 31–52.Google Scholar

Fernando, D. D., Lazzaro, M. D. & Owens, J. N. (2005). Growth and development of conifer pollen tubes. Sexual Plant Reproduction, 18: 149–162.Google Scholar

Fields, C. & Levin, M. (2018). Are planaria individuals? What regenerative biology is telling us about the nature of multicellularity. Evolutionary Biology, 45: 237–247.Google Scholar

Finch, C. E. (1990). Longevity, Senescence, and the Genome. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fischer, E. (2009). Protracheophyta (Horneophytopsida), Tracheophyta p.p.: Rhyniophytina, Lycophytina, ‘Trimerophytina’, Moniliformopses (‘Pteridophyta’), Radiatopses (Progymnospermopsida). In Syllabus of Plant Families, 13th edn, ed. Frey, W.. Berlin; Stuttgart: Borntraeger, Vol. 3, pp. 264–399.Google Scholar

Flatt, T. & Heyland, A. (eds.) (2011). Mechanisms of Life History Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Flindt, R. (2003). Amazing Numbers in Biology. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Flinn, K. M. (2006). Reproductive biology of three fern species may contribute to differential colonization success in post-agricultural forests. American Journal of Botany, 93: 1289–1294.Google Scholar

Flores-Renteria, L., Molina-Freaner, F., Whipple, A. V., Gehring, C. A. & Dominguez, C. A. (2013). Sexual stability in the nearly dioecious Pinus johannis (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany, 100: 602–612.Google Scholar

Fransson, T., Jansson, L., Kolehmainen, T., Kroon, C. & Wenninger, T. (2017). EURING list of longevity records for European birds. https://euring.org/data-and-codes/longevity-list (accessed April 2019).Google Scholar

Fraser, C., Hanage, W. P. & Spratt, B. G. (2007). Recombination and the nature of bacterial speciation. Science, 315: 476–480.Google Scholar

Fraser, J. A. & Heitman, J. (2004). Evolution of fungal sex chromosomes. Molecular Microbiology, 51: 299–306.Google Scholar

Freeman, D. C., Harper, K. T. & Charnov, E. L. (1980). Sex change in plants: old and new observations and new hypotheses. Oecologia (Berlin), 47: 222–232.Google Scholar

Freeman, D. C., Wachocki, B. A., Stender, M. J., Goldschlag, D. E. & Michaels, H. J. (1994). Seed size and sex ratio in spinach: application of the Trivers–Willard hypothesis to plants. Ecoscience, 1: 54–63.Google Scholar

Frey, W. & Stech, M. (2009). Marchantiophyta, Bryophyta, Anthocerotophyta. In Syllabus of Plant Families, 13th edn, ed. Frey, W.. Berlin; Stuttgart: Borntraeger, Vol. 3, pp. 9–263.Google Scholar

Fritsch, F. E. (1935, 1945). The Structure and Reproduction of the Algae, 1 (1935), 2 (1945). London; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fryer, G. (1961). The developmental history of Mutela bourguignati (Ancey) Bourguignat (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 244: 259–298.Google Scholar

Funch, P. & Kristensen, R. M. (1995). Cycliophora is a new phylum with affinities to Entoprocta and Ectoprocta. Nature, 378: 711–714.Google Scholar

Fusco, G. & Minelli, A. (2010). Phenotypic plasticity in development and evolution: facts and concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 365: 547–556.Google Scholar

Futuyma, D. J. & Kirkpatrick, M. (2018). Evolution, international 4th edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Galaktionov, K. V. & Dobrovolskij, A. A. (2003). The Biology and Evolution of Trematodes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Gardner, S. N. & Mangel, M. (1997). When can a clonal organism escape senescence? American Naturalist, 150: 462–490.Google Scholar

Gasparini, F., Manni, L., Cima, F. et al. (2015). Sexual and asexual reproduction in the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri. Genesis, 53: 105–120.Google Scholar

Georgiades, P., Watkins, M., Burton, G. J. & Ferguson-Smith, A. C. (2001). Roles for genomic imprinting and the zygotic genome in placental development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98: 4522–4527.Google Scholar

Ghirardelli, E. (1953). L’accoppiamento in Spadella cephaloptera Busch. Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli, 24: 345–354.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, M. T. (1974a). The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, M. T. (1974b). A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology, 23: 536–544.Google Scholar

Gianasi, B. L., Hamel, J.-F. & Mercier, A. (2018). Full allogeneic fusion of embryos in a holothuroid echinoderm. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 285: 20180339.Google Scholar

Gilbert, S. F. & Barresi, J. F. (2016). Developmental Biology, 11th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Gilbert, S. F. & Epel, D. (2015). Ecological Developmental Biology: the Environmental Regulation of Development, Health, and Evolution, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Gilbert, S. F., Sapp, J. & Tauber, A. I. (2012). A symbiotic view of life: we have never been individuals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 87: 325–341.Google Scholar

Gladyshev, E. A. & Arkhipova, I. R. (2010). Genome structure of bdelloid rotifers: shaped by asexuality or desiccation? Journal of Heredity, 101 (Supplement 1): S85–S93.Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gokhman, V. E. & Kuznetsova, V. G. (2018). Parthenogenesis in Hexapoda: Holometabolous insects. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 56: 23–34.Google Scholar

Gordon, J. L., Armisen, D., Proux-Wera, E. et al. (2011). Evolutionary erosion of yeast sex chromosomes by mating-type switching accidents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108: 20024–20029.Google Scholar

Gorelik, R. (2012). Mitosis circumscribes individuals; sex creates new individuals. Biology and Philosophy, 27: 871–890.Google Scholar

Goto, T. & Yoshida, M. (1985). The mating sequence of the benthic arrowworm Spadella schizoptera. Biological Bulletin, 169: 328–333.Google Scholar

Grbic, M., Ode, P. J. & Strand, M. R. (1992). Sibling rivalry and brood sex ratios in polyembryonic wasps. Nature, 360: 254–256.Google Scholar

Green, R. F. & Noakes, D. L. G. (1995). Is a little bit of sex as good as a lot? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 174: 87–96.Google Scholar

Greene, D. F. & Johnson, E. A. (1994). Estimating the mean annual seed production of trees. Ecology, 75: 642–647.Google Scholar

Grosberg, R. K. & Strathmann, R. R. (1998). One cell, two cell, red cell, blue cell: the persistence of a unicellular stage in multicellular life histories. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13: 112–116.Google Scholar

Grosse-Veldmann, B. & Weigend, M. (2018). The geometry of gender: hyper-diversification of sexual systems in Urtica L. (Urticaceae). Cladistics, 34: 131–150.Google Scholar

Gunstream, S. E. & Chew, R. M. (1967). The ecology of Psorophora confinnis (Diptera: Culicidae) in southern California. II. Temperature and development. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 60: 434–439.Google Scholar

Haig, D. (2016). Living together and living apart: the sexual lives of bryophytes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371: 20150535.Google Scholar

Halary, S., Malik, S. B., Lildhar, L. et al. (2011). Conserved meiotic machinery in Glomus spp., a putatively ancient asexual fungal lineage. Genome Biology and Evolution, 3: 950–958.Google Scholar

Hanelt, B., Bolek, M. G. & Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. (2012). Going solo: discovery of the first parthenogenetic gordiid (Nematomorpha: Gordiida). PLOS One, 7 (4): e34472.Google Scholar

Hansen, K. (1984). Discrimination and production of disparlure enantiomers by the gypsy moth and the nun moth. Physiological Entomology, 9: 9–18.Google Scholar

Harada, Y., Takagaki, M., Saito, T. et al. (2008). Mechanism of self-sterility in a hermaphroditic chordate. Science, 320: 548–550.Google Scholar

Harper, J. L. & White, J. (1974). The demography of plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5: 419–463.Google Scholar

Harrath, A. H., Sluys, R., Zghal, F. & Tekaya, S. (2009). First report of adelphophagy in flatworms during the embryonic development of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea (Benazzi, Baguñà, Ballester, Puccinelli & Del Papa, 1975) (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development, 53: 117–124.Google Scholar

Harrison, P. L. (2011). Sexual reproduction of scleractinian corals. In Coral Reefs: an Ecosystem in Transition, ed. Dubinsky, Z. & Stambler, N.. London; New York, NY: Springer, pp. 59–85.Google Scholar

Hechinger, R. F., Wood, A. C. & Kuris, A. M. (2011). Social organization in a flatworm: trematode parasites form soldier and reproductive castes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 278: 656–665.Google Scholar

Hedtke, S. M., Stanger-Hall, K., Baker, R. J. & Hillis, D. M. (2008). All-male asexuality: origin and maintenance of androgenesis in the Asian clam Corbicula. Evolution, 62: 1119–1136.Google Scholar

Heiner, I. & Kristensen, R. M. (2008). Urnaloricus gadi nov. gen. et nov. sp. (Loricifera, Urnaloricidae nov. fam.), an aberrant Loricifera with a vivipaous pedogenetic life cycle. Journal of Morphology, 270: 129–153.Google Scholar

Heming, B. S. (2003). Insect Development and Evolution. Ithaca, NY: Comstock.Google Scholar

Henderson, K. A. & Gottschling, D. E. (2008). A mother’s sacrifice: what is she keeping for herself? Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 20: 723–728.Google Scholar

Hinman, V. & Cary, G. (2017). Conserved processes of metazoan whole-body regeneration identified in sea star larvae. bioRxiv preprint. doi: 10.1101/118232.Google Scholar

Hojsgaard, D. H., Martínez, E. J. & Quarin, C. L. (2013). Competition between meiotic and apomictic pathways during ovule and seed development results in clonality. New Phytologist, 197: 336–347.Google Scholar

Hörandl, E. (2006). The complex causality of geographical parthenogenesis. New Phytologist, 171: 525–538.Google Scholar

Horne, D. J. & Martens, K. (1999). Geographical parthenogenesis in European non-marine ostracods: post-glacial invasion or Holocene stability? Hydrobiologia, 391: 1–7.Google Scholar

Hoving, H. J. T., Laptikhovsky, V. V. & Robison, B. H. (2015). Vampire squid reproductive strategy is unique among coleoid cephalopods. Current Biology, 25: R321–R323.Google Scholar

Hughes, P. W. (2017). Between semelparity and iteroparity: Empirical evidence for a continuum of modes of parity. Ecology and Evolution, 7: 8232–8261.Google Scholar

Hughes, R. N. (1989). A Functional Biology of Clonal Animals. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Igea, J., Miller, E. F., Papadopulos, A. S. T. & Tanentzap, A. J. (2017). Seed size and its rate of evolution correlate with species diversification across angiosperms. PLOS Biology, 15 (7): e2002792.Google Scholar

Iglésias, S. P., Sellos, D. Y. & Nakaya, K. (2005). Discovery of a normal hermaphroditic chondrichthyan species: Apristurus longicephalus. Journal of Fish Biology, 66: 417–428.Google Scholar

Ignace, D. D., Dodson, S. I. & Kashian, D. R. (2011). Identification of the critical timing of sex determination in Daphnia magna (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) for use in toxicological studies. Hydrobiologia, 668: 117–123.Google Scholar

Iskandar, D. T., Evans, B. J. & McGuire, J. A. (2014). A novel reproductive mode in frogs: a new species of fanged frog with internal fertilization and birth of tadpoles. PLOS One, 9 (12): e115884.Google Scholar

Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jaeckle, W. B. (1994). Multiple modes of asexual reproduction by tropical and subtropical sea star larvae: an unusual adaptation for genet dispersal and survival. Biological Bulletin, 186: 62–71.Google Scholar

Jaklitsch, W., Baral, H.-O., Lücking, R. & Lumbsch, H. T. (2016). Ascomycota. In Syllabus of Plant Families, 13th edn, ed. Frey, W.. Berlin; Stuttgart: Borntraeger, Vol. 1/2.Google Scholar

Janousek, B. & Mrackova, M. (2010). Sex chromosomes and sex determination pathway dynamics in plant and animal models. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 100: 737–752.Google Scholar

Jany, J. & Pawlowska, T. E. (2010). Multinucleate spores contribute to evolutionary longevity of asexual Glomeromycota. American Naturalist, 175: 424–435.Google Scholar

Janzen, D. H. (1977). What are dandelions and aphids? American Naturalist, 111: 586–589.Google Scholar

Jarne, P. & Auld, J. R. (2006). Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution, 60: 1816–1824.Google Scholar

Jaspers, C., Haraldsson, M., Bolte, S. et al. (2012). Ctenophore population recruits entirely through larval reproduction in the central Baltic Sea. Biology Letters, 8: 809–812.Google Scholar

Jetz, W., Sekercioglu, C. H. & Böhning-Gaese, K. (2008). The worldwide variation in avian clutch size across species and space. PLOS Biology, 6 (12): e303.Google Scholar

Johnson, G. D., Paxton, J. R., Sutton, T. T. et al. (2009). Deap-sea mystery solved: astonishing larval transformations and extreme sexual dimorphism unite three fish families. Biology Letters, 5: 235–239.Google Scholar

Jordal, B. H., Beaver, R. A., Normark, B. B. & Farrell, B. D. (2002). Extraordinary sex ratios and the evolution of male neoteny in sib-mating Ozopemon beetles. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 75: 353–360.Google Scholar

Jordal, B. H., Normark, B. B. & Farrell, B. D. (2000). Evolutionary radiation of an inbreeding haplodiploid beetle lineage (Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 71: 483–499.Google Scholar

Juarez, C. & Banks, J. A. (1998). Sex determination in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 1: 68–72.Google Scholar

Kaiser, V. B. & Bachtrog, D. (2010). Evolution of sex chromosomes in insects. Annual Review of Genetics, 44: 91–112.Google Scholar

Kamiya, M., Lindstrom, S. C., Nakayama, T. et al. (2017). Photoautotrophic eukaryotic Algae. Rhodophyta. In Syllabus of Plant Families, 13th edn, ed. Frey, W.. Berlin; Stuttgart: Borntraeger, Vol. 2/2.Google Scholar

Karsten, K. B., Andriamandimbiarisoa, L. N., Fox, S. F. & Raxworthy, C. J. (2008). A unique life history among tetrapods: an annual chameleon living mostly as an egg. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105: 8980–8984.Google Scholar

Kelly, D. R. (1996). When is a butterfly like an elephant? Chemical Biology, 3: 595–602.Google Scholar

Khosla, S., Mendiratta, G. & Brahmachari, V. (2006). Genomic imprinting in the mealybugs. Cytogenetics and Genome Research, 113: 41–52.Google Scholar

Kirk, D. L. (2001). Germ–soma differentiation in Volvox. Developmental Biology, 238: 213–223.Google Scholar

Kishore, K. (2014). Polyembryony. In Reproductive Biology of Plants, ed. Ramawat, K. G., Mérillon, J. M. & Shivanna, K. R.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 355–370.Google Scholar

Knoflach, B. & van Harten, A. (2000). Palpal loss, single palp copulation and obligatory mate consumption in Tidarren cuneolatum (Tullgren, 1910) (Araneae, Theridiidae). Journal of Natural History, 34: 1639–1659.Google Scholar

Knoflach, B. & van Harten, A. (2001). Tidarren argo sp. nov. (Araneae: Theridiidae) and its exceptional copulatory behaviour: emasculation, male palpal organ as a mating plug and sexual cannibalism. Journal of Zoology, 254: 449–459.Google Scholar

Kočarek, P. (2009). A case of viviparity in a tropical non-parasitizing earwig (Dermaptera Spongiphoridae). Tropical Zoology, 22: 237–241.Google Scholar

Komma, D. J. & Endow, S. A. (1995). Haploidy and androgenesis in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92: 11884–11888.Google Scholar

Kondrashov, A. S. (2018). Through sex, nature is telling us something important. Trends in Genetics, 34: 352–361.Google Scholar

Koopman, P. (2009). Sex determination: the power of DMRT1. Trends in Genetics, 25: 479–481.Google Scholar

Kopp, A. (2012). Dmrt genes in the development and evolution of sexual dimorphism. Trends in Genetics, 28: 175–184.Google Scholar

Kraak, S. B. M. & Pen, I. (2002). Sex-determining mechanisms in vertebrates. In Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods, ed. Hardy, I. C. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 158–177.Google Scholar

Krebs, J. E., Goldstein, E. S. & Kilpatrick, S. T. (2011). Lewin’s Genes X. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar

Kreulen, D. J. W. (1972). Spore output of moss capsules in relation to ontogeny of archesporial tissue. Journal of Bryology, 7: 61–74.Google Scholar

Kristensen, R. M. & Funch, P. (2000). Micrognathozoa: a new class with complicated jaws like those of Rotifera and Gnathostomulida. Journal of Morphology, 246: 1–49.Google Scholar

Kuo, L.-Y., Chen, C.-W., Shinohara, W. et al. (2017). Not only in the temperate zone: independent gametophytes of two vittarioid ferns (Pteridaceae, Polypodiales) in East Asian subtropics. Journal of Plant Research, 130: 255–262.Google Scholar

LaFave, M. C. & Sekelsky, J. (2009). Mitotic recombination: why? when? how? where? PLOS Genetics, 5 (3): e1000411.Google Scholar

Lanfear, R. (2018). Do plants have a segregated germline? PLOS Biology, 16 (5): e2005439.Google Scholar

Lapierre, P. & Gogarten, P. (2009). Estimating the size of the bacterial pan-genome. Trends in Genetics, 25: 107–110.Google Scholar

Larsen, K. (2005). Deep-sea Tanaidacea (Peracarida) from the Gulf of Mexico. Crustacean Monographs 5. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Lee, R. E. (2008). Phycology. 4th edn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leeb, M. & Wutz, A. (2010). Mechanistic concepts in X inactivation underlying dosage compensation in mammals. Heredity, 105: 64–70.Google Scholar

Lehtonen, J., Jennions, M. D. & Kokko, H. (2012). The many costs of sex. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27: 172–178.Google Scholar

Leliaert, F., Blindow, I. & Schudack, M. (2015a). Ulvophyceae (except Trentepohliales). In Syllabus of Plant Families, 13th edn, ed. Frey, W.. Berlin; Stuttgart: Borntraeger, Vol. 2/1, pp. 267–280.Google Scholar

Leliaert, F., Lopez-Bautista, J. & De Clerk, O. (2015b). Charophyceae. In Syllabus of Plant Families, 13th edn, ed. Frey, W.. Berlin; Stuttgart: Borntraeger, Vol. 2/1, pp. 294–300.Google Scholar

Levin, T. C. & King, N. (2013). Evidence for sex and recombination in the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta. Current Biology, 23: 2176–2180.Google Scholar

Li, S. I. & Purugganan, M. D. (2011). The cooperative amoeba: Dictyostelium as a model for social evolution. Trends in Genetics, 27: 48–54.Google Scholar

Lindås, A. C., Karlsson, E. A., Lindgren, M. T., Ettema, T. J. & Bernander, R. (2008). A unique cell division machinery in the Archaea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105: 18942–18946.Google Scholar

Lloyd, D. G. & Webb, C. J. (1977). Secondary sex characters in plants. Botanical Review, 43: 177–216.Google Scholar

Locey, K. J. & Lennon, J. T. (2016). Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113: 5970–5975.Google Scholar

Lundmark, M. & Saura, A. (2006). Asexuality alone does not explain the success of clonal forms in insects with geographical parthenogenesis. Hereditas, 143: 23–32.Google Scholar

Lushai, G. & Loxdale, H. D. (2002). The biological improbability of a clone. Genetics Research, 79: 1–9.Google Scholar

Lynch, M. (2010). Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends in Genetics, 26: 345–352.Google Scholar

Lynch, M., Koskella, B. & Schaack, S. (2006). Mutation pressure and the evolution of organelle genomic architecture. Science, 311: 1727–1730.Google Scholar

Makarova, K. S., Yutin, N., Bell, S. D. & Koonin, E. V. (2010). Evolution of diverse cell division and vesicle formation systems in Archaea. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8: 731–741.Google Scholar

Malik, S. B., Pightling, A. W., Stefaniak, L. M., Schurko, A. M. & Logsdon, J. M. (2008). An expanded inventory of conserved meiotic genes provides evidence for sex in Trichomonas vaginalis. PLOS One, 3 (8): e2879.Google Scholar

Manabe, H., Ishimura, M., Shinomiya, A. & Sunobe, T. (2007). Field evidence for bidirectional sex change in the polygynous gobiid fish Trimma okinawae. Journal of Fish Biology, 70: 600–609.Google Scholar

Mann, T. (1984). Spermatophores: Development, Structure, Biochemical Attributes, and Role in the Transfer of Spermatozoa. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Mantovani, B., Passamonti, M. & Scali, V. (1999). Genomic evolution in parental and hybrid taxa of the genus Bacillus (Insecta, Phasmatodea). Italian Journal of Zoology, 66: 265–272.Google Scholar

Mantovani, B. & Scali, V. (1992). Hybridogenesis and androgenesis in the stick-insect Bacillus rossius-grandii benazzii (Insecta, Phasmatodea). Evolution, 46: 783–796.Google Scholar

Marescalchi, O., Pijnacker, L. P. & Scali, V. (1993). Automictic parthenogenesis and its genetic consequence in Bacillus atticus atticus (Insecta Phasmatodea). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development, 24: 7–12.Google Scholar

Marin, I. & Baker, B. S. (1998). The evolutionary dynamics of sex determination. Science, 281: 1990–1994.Google Scholar

Marques, A. C., García, J. & Ames, C. L. (2015). Internal fertilization and sperm storage in cnidarians: a response to Orr and Brennan. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30: 435–436.Google Scholar

Martín-Durán, J. M. & Egger, B. (2012). Developmental diversity in free-living flatworms. EvoDevo, 3: 7.Google Scholar

Martinez, D. E. (1997). Mortality patterns suggest lack of senescence in hydra. Experimental Gerontology, 33: 217–225.Google Scholar

Maruyama, D., Hamamura, Y., Takeuchi, H. et al. (2013). Independent control by each female gamete prevents the attraction of multiple pollen tubes. Developmental Cell, 25: 317–323.Google Scholar

Matthes, D. (1988). Tierische Parasiten: Biologie und Ökologie. Braunschweig; Wiesbaden: Vieweg.Google Scholar

Matveevsky, S., Bakloushinskaya, I. & Kolomiets, O. (2016). Unique sex chromosome systems in Ellobius: how do male XX chromosomes recombine and undergo pachytene chromatin inactivation? Scientific Reports, 6: 29949.Google Scholar

Mauseth, J. D. (1988). Plant Anatomy. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar

McCabe, J. & Dunn, A. M. (1997). Adaptive significance of environmental sex determination in an amphipod. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10: 515–527.Google Scholar

McCurdy, D. G., Painter, D. C., Kopec, M. T. et al. (2008). Reproductive behaviour of intersexes of an intertidal amphipod Corophium volutator. Invertebrate Biology, 127: 417–425.Google Scholar

McKone, M. J. & Halpern, S. L. (2003). The evolution of androgenesis. American Naturalist, 161: 641–656.Google Scholar

Michalik, P., Knoflach, B., Thaler, K. & Alberti, G. (2010). Live for the moment: adaptations in the male genital system of a sexually cannibalistic spider (Theridiidae, Araneae). Tissue and Cell, 42: 32–36.Google Scholar

Michalik, P. & Uhl, G. (2005). The male genital system of the cellar spider Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin, 1775) (Pholcidae, Araneae): development of spermatozoa and seminal secretion. Frontiers in Zoology, 2: 12.Google Scholar

Minelli, A. (2009). Perspectives in Animal Phylogeny and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Minelli, A. (2014). Developmental disparity. In Towards a Theory of Development, ed. Minelli, A. & Pradeu, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–245.Google Scholar

Minelli, A. (2018). Plant Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Minelli, A., Brena, C., Deflorian, G., Maruzzo, D. & Fusco, G. (2006). From embryo to adult: beyond the conventional periodization of arthropod development. Development Genes and Evolution, 216: 373–383.Google Scholar

Minelli, A. & Fusco, G. (2010). Developmental plasticity and the evolution of animal complex life cycles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 365: 631–640.Google Scholar

Minelli, A. & Fusco, G. (2013). Arthropod post-embryonic development. In Arthropod Biology and Evolution. Molecules, Development, Morphology, ed. Minelli, A., Boxshall, G. & Fusco, G.. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 91–122.Google Scholar

Ming, R., Bendahmane, A. & Renner, S. S. (2011). Sex chromosomes in land plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 62: 485–514.Google Scholar

Miya, M., Pietsch, T. W., Orr, J. W. et al. (2010). Evolutionary history of anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes): a mitogenomic perspective. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10: 58.Google Scholar

Mogie, M. (1992). The Evolution of Asexual Reproduction in Plants. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Monaghan, P. & Haussmann, M. F. (2006). Do telomere dynamics link lifestyle and lifespan? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21: 47–53.Google Scholar

Moore, D. S. (2017). The Developing Genome: an Introduction to Behavioral Epigenetics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morison, I. M., Ramsay, J. P. & Spencer, H. G. (2005). A census of mammalian imprinting. Trends in Genetics, 21: 457–465.Google Scholar

Munday, P. L., Kuwamura, T. & Kroon, F. J. (2010). Bidirectional sex change in marine fishes. In Reproduction and Sexuality in Marine Fishes: Patterns and Processes, ed. Cole, K. S.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 241–271.Google Scholar

Nath, P., Bouzayen, M., Mattoo, A. K. & Pech, J. C. (eds.) (2014). Fruit Ripening: Physiology, Signalling and Genomics. Wallingford: CABI.Google Scholar

Naurin, S., Hansson, B., Bensch, S. & Hasselquist, D. (2010). Why does dosage compensation differ between XY and ZW taxa? Trends in Genetics, 26: 15–20.Google Scholar

Neestupa, J. (2015). Chlorophyta, Streptophyta. In Syllabus of Plant Families, 13th edn, ed. Frey, W.. Berlin; Stuttgart: Borntraeger, Vol. 2/1, pp. 191–247, 264–267, 282–294.Google Scholar

Neiman, M., Lively, C. M. & Meirmans, S. (2017). Why sex? A pluralist approach revisited. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32: 589–600.Google Scholar

Nguyen, K. B. & Smart, G. C. (1990). Heterorhabditis spp.: nematode parasites of insects. Nematology Circular, 173. Gainesville, FL: Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Service, Division of Plant Industry.Google Scholar

Nielsen, C. (2012). Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nielsen, J., Hedeholm, R. B., Heinemeier, J. et al. (2016). Eye lens radiocarbon reveals centuries of longevity in the Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus). Science, 353: 702–704.Google Scholar

Nieuwenhuis, B. P. S. & James, T. Y. (2016). The frequency of sex in fungi. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371: 20150540.Google Scholar

Noda, I. (1960). The emergence of winged viviparous female in aphids. VI. Difference in the rate of development between the winged and the unwinged forms. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 10: 97–102.Google Scholar

Nogler, G. A. (1984). Genetics of apospory in apomictic Ranunculus auricomus: 5. Conclusion. Botanica Helvetica, 94: 411–423.Google Scholar

Normark, B. B. (2003). The evolution of alternate genetic systems in insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 48: 397–423.Google Scholar

Noro, C., López-Greco, L. S. & Buckup, L. (2007). Gonad morphology and type of sexuality in Parastacus defossus Faxon 1898, a burrowing, intersexed crayfish from southern Brazil (Decapoda: Parastacidae). Acta Zoologica, 89: 59–67.Google Scholar

O’Gorman, C. M., Fuller, H. T. & Dyer, P. S. (2009). Discovery of a sexual cycle in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature, 457: 471–474.Google Scholar

Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the Levels of Selection. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Oliveira, R. F., Taborsky, M. & Brockmann, H. J. (eds.) (2008). Alternative Reproductive Tactics: an Integrative Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oliver, B. (2007). Sex, dose, and equality. PLOS Biology, 5 (12): e340.Google Scholar

Omilian, A. R., Cristescu, M. E. A., Dudycha, J. L. & Lynch, M. (2006). Ameiotic recombination in asexual lineages of Daphnia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103: 18638–18643.Google Scholar

Ostrovsky, A. N., Lidgard, S., Gordon, D. P. et al. (2016). Matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm. Biological Reviews, 91: 673–711.Google Scholar

Ota, K. G. (2018). Recent advances in hagfish developmental biology in a historical context: implications for understanding the evolution of the vertebral elements. In Reproductive and Developmental Strategies: Diversity and Commonality in Animals, ed. Kobayashi, K., Kitano, T., Iwao, Y. & Kondo, M.. Tokyo: Springer, pp. 615–634.Google Scholar

Pacini, E. (2010). Relationship between tapetum, loculus, and pollen during development. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 171: 1–11.Google Scholar

Paemelaere, E. A. D., Guyer, C. & Dobson, F. S. (2011). A phylogenetic framework for the evolution of female polymorphism in anoles. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 104: 303–317.Google Scholar

Palevitz, B. A. & Tiezzi, A. (1992). Organization, composition, and function of the generative cell and sperm cytoskeleton. International Review of Cytology, 140: 149–185.Google Scholar

Pannell, J. R. (2017). Plant sex determination. Current Biology, 27: R191–R197.Google Scholar

Parker, G. A. (2014). The sexual cascade and the rise of pre-ejaculatory (Darwinian) sexual selection, sex roles, and sexual conflict. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 6: a017509.Google Scholar

Parker, J. D. (2004). A major evolutionary transition to more than two sexes? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19: 83–86.Google Scholar

Pearcy, M., Hardy, O. & Aron, S. (2006). Thelytokous parthenogenesis and its consequences on inbreeding in an ant. Heredity, 96: 377–382.Google Scholar

Pearson, H. (2006). What is a gene? Nature, 441: 469–474.Google Scholar

Peccoud, J., Loiseau, V., Cordaux, R., Gilbert, C. (2017). Massive horizontal transfer of transposable elements in insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114: 4721–4726.Google Scholar

Penman, D. J. & Piferrer, F. (2008). Fish gonadogenesis. Part I: genetic and environmental mechanisms of sex determination. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 16 (Supplement 1): 14–32.Google Scholar

Pennell, M. W., Mank, J. E. & Peichel, C. L. (2018). Transitions in sex determination and sex chromosomes across vertebrate species. Molecular Ecology, 27: 3950–3963.Google Scholar

Perrin, N. (2016). Random sex determination: when developmental noise tips the sex balance. BioEssays, 38: 1218–1226.Google Scholar

Perry, L. E., Pannell, J. R. & Dorken, M. E. (2012). Two’s company, three’s a crowd: experimental evaluation of the evolutionary maintenance of trioecy in Mercurialis annua (Euphorbiaceae). PLOS One, 7 (4): e35597.Google Scholar

Phadke, S. S. & Zufall, R. A. (2009). Rapid diversification of mating systems in ciliates. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 98: 187–197.Google Scholar

Pichot, C., El Mataoui, M., Raddi, S. & Raddi, P. (2001). Surrogate mother for endangered Cupressus. Nature, 412: 39.Google Scholar

Pietsch, T. W. & Orr, J. W. (2007). Phylogenetic relationships of deep-sea anglerfishes of the suborder Ceratioidei (Teleostei: Lophiiformes) based on morphology. Copeia, 2007: 1–34.Google Scholar

Piraino, S., Boero, F., Aeschbach, B. & Schmid, V. (1996). Reversing the life cycle: medusae transforming into polyps and cell transdifferentiation in Turritopsis nutricula (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa). Biological Bulletin, 190: 302–312.Google Scholar

Poethig, R. S. (2003). Phase change and the regulation of developmental timing in plants. Science, 301: 334–336.Google Scholar

Pommerville, J. C. (2011). Alcamo’s Fundamentals of Microbiology, 9th edn. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar

Pradeu, T. (2010). What is an organism? An immunological answer. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32: 247–267.Google Scholar

Pradeu, T. (2012). The Limits of the Self: Immunology and Biological Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pradeu, T. (2016). Organisms or biological individuals? Combining physiological and evolutionary individuality. Biology and Philosophy, 31: 797–817.Google Scholar

Pradeu, T., Laplane, L., Prévot, K. et al. (2016). Defining ‘development’. Current Topics in Developmental Biology, 117: 171–183.Google Scholar

Premoli, M. C. & Sella, G. (1995). Sex economy in benthic polychaetes. Ethology Ecology Evolution, 7: 27–48.Google Scholar

Prévot, V., Jordaens, K., Sonet, G. & Backeljau, T. (2013). Exploring species level taxonomy and species delimitation methods in the facultatively self-fertilizing land snail genus Rumina (Gastropoda: Pulmonata). PLOS One, 8 (4): e60736.Google Scholar

Proctor, H. C. (1998). Indirect sperm transfer in arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 43: 153–174.Google Scholar

Queller, D. (2005). Males from Mars. Nature, 435: 1167–1168.Google Scholar

Radder, R. S., Pike, D. A., Quinn, A. E. & Shine, R. (2009). Offspring sex in a lizard depends on egg size. Current Biology, 19: 1102–1105.Google Scholar

Raigner, A. & van Bovan, J. (1955). Etude taxonomique, biologique et biométrique des Dorylus du sou-genre Anomma (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge. Nouvelle Série. Sciences Zoologiques, 2: 1–359.Google Scholar

Raikov, I. B. (1994). The diversity of forms of mitosis in protozoa: a comparative review. European Journal of Protistology, 30: 253–269.Google Scholar

Ram, Y. & Hadany, L. (2016). Condition-dependent sex: who does it, when and why? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371: 20150539.Google Scholar

Ramesh, M. A., Malik, S. B. & Logsdon, J. M. (2005). A phylogenomic inventory of meiotic genes: evidence for sex in Giardia and an early eukaryotic origin of meiosis. Current Biology, 15: 185–191.Google Scholar

Ramm, S. J., Poirier, M. & Scharer, L. (2015). Hypodermic self-insemination as a reproductive insurance strategy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 282, 20150660.Google Scholar

Redecker, D. (2012). Glomeromycota. In Syllabus of Plant Families, 13th edn, ed. Frey, W.. Berlin; Stuttgart: Borntraeger, Vol. 1/1, pp. 163–170.Google Scholar

Reinhard, F., Herle, M., Bastiansen, F. & Streit, B. (2003). Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany. Berlin: Federal Environmental Agency.Google Scholar

Reisinger, E., Cichocki, I., Erlach, T. & Szyskowitz, T. (1974). Ontogenetische Studien an Turbellarien: ein Beitrag zur Evolution der Dotterverarbeitung im ektolecithalen Ei. II. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 12: 241–278.Google Scholar

Renner, S. S. (2014). The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. American Journal of Botany 101: 1588–1596.Google Scholar

Ricci, C. (2001). Dormancy patterns in rotifers. Hydrobiologia, 446/447: 1–11.Google Scholar

Richards, A. J. (1997). Plant Breeding Systems, 2nd edn. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Rieger, R., Michaelis, A. & Green, M. M. (1976). Glossary of Genetics and Cytogenetics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Roark, E., Guilderson, T. P., Dunbar, R. B., Fallon, S. J. & Mucciarone, D. A. (2009). Extreme longevity in proteinaceous deep-sea corals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106: 5204–5208.Google Scholar

Rocha, F., Guerra, A. & González, A. F. (2001). A review of reproductive strategies in cephalopods. Biological Reviews, 76: 291–304.Google Scholar

Roff, D. A. (2002). Life History Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Rosenstiel, T. N., Shortlidge, E. E., Melnychenko, A. N., Pankow, J. F. & Eppley, S. M. (2012). Sex-specific volatile compounds influence microarthropod-mediated fertilization of moss. Nature, 489: 431–433.Google Scholar

Ross, C. N., French, J. A. & Ortí, G. (2007). Germ-line chimerism and paternal care in marmosets (Callithrix kuhlii). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104: 6278–6282.Google Scholar

Rouse, G. W, Goffredi, S. K. & Vrijenhoek, R. C. (2004). Osedax: bone-eating marine worms with dwarf males. Science, 305: 668–671.Google Scholar

Rouse, G. W. & Pleijel, F. (2001). Polychaetes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rouse, G. W., Wilson, N. G., Carvajal, J. I. & Vrijenhoek, R. C. (2016). New deep-sea species of Xenoturbella and the position of Xenacoelomorpha. Nature, 530: 94–97.Google Scholar

Russell, P. J. (2010). iGenetics, 3rd edn. San Francisco, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar

Ryland, J. S. (2005). Bryozoa: an introductory overview. Denisia, 16: 9–20.Google Scholar

Salje, J., Gayathri, P. & Löwe, J. (2010). The ParMRC system: molecular mechanisms of plasmid segregation by actin-like filaments. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8: 683–692.Google Scholar

Sallon, S., Solowey, E., Cohen, Y. et al. (2008). Germination, genetics, and growth of an ancient date seed. Science, 320: 1464.Google Scholar

Salomon, M., Aflalo, E. D., Coll, M. & Lubin, Y. (2015). Dramatic histological changes preceding suicidal maternal care in the subsocial spider Stegodyphus lineatus (Araneae: Eresidae). Journal of Arachnology, 43: 77–85.Google Scholar

Sánchez, L. (2008). Sex-determining mechanisms in insects. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 52: 837–856.Google Scholar

Sano, N., Obata, M., Ooie, Y. & Komaru, A. (2011). Mitochondrial DNA copy number is maintained during spermatogenesis and in the development of male larvae to sustain the doubly uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial DNA system in the blue mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Development Growth and Differentiation, 53: 816–821.Google Scholar

Santelices, B. (1999). How many kinds of individual are there? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14: 152–155.Google Scholar

Santelices, B., Correa, J. A., Meneses, I., Aedo, D. & Varela, D. (1996). Sporeling coalescence and intra-clonal variation in Gracilaria chilensis (Gracilariales: Rhodophyta). Journal of Phycology, 32: 313–322.Google Scholar

Sato, S., Beakes, G., Idel, M., Nagumo, T. & Mann, D. G. (2011). Novel sex cells and evidence for sex pheromones in diatoms. PLOS One, 6 (10): e26923.Google Scholar

Scali, V., Passamonti, M., Marescalchi, O. & Mantovani, B. (2003). Linkage between sexual and asexual lineages: genome evolution in Bacillus stick insects. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 79: 137–150.Google Scholar

Schön, I. & Martens, K. (2017). Paradox of sex. In Oxford Bibliographies in Evolutionary Biology, ed. Losos, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199941728/obo-9780199941728-0035.xml (accessed April 2019).Google Scholar

Schön, I., Martens, K. & van Dijk, P. (eds.) (2009). Lost Sex: the Evolutionary Biology of Parthenogenesis. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Schrader, F. (1923). The origin of the mycetocytes in Pseudococcus. Biological Bulletin, 40: 259–270.Google Scholar

Schroeder, P. C. & Hermans, C. O. (1975). Annelida: Polychaeta. In Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates, 3. Annelids and Echiurans, ed. Giese, A. C. & Pearse, J. S.. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 1–213.Google Scholar

Schurko, A. M. & Logsdon, J. M. Jr. (2008). Using a meiosis detection toolkit to investigate ancient asexual ‘scandals’ and the evolution of sex. BioEssays, 30: 579–589.Google Scholar

Schurko, A. M., Neiman, M. & Logsdon, J. M. Jr. (2009). Signs of sex: what we know and how we know it. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24: 208–217.Google Scholar

Schut, E., Hemmings, N. & Birkhead, T. R. (2008). Parthenogenesis in a passerine bird, the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata. Ibis, 150: 197–199.Google Scholar

Schwander, T. & Oldroyd, B. P. (2016). Androgenesis: where males hijack eggs to clone themselves. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371: 20150534.Google Scholar

Scott, R. J., Armstrong, S. J., Doughty, J. & Spielman, M. (2008). Double fertilization in Arabidopsis thaliana involves a polyspermy block on the egg but not the central cell. Molecular Plant, 1: 611–619.Google Scholar

Segoli, M., Larari, A. R., Rosenheim, J. A., Bouslika, A. & Keasar, T. (2010). The evolution of polyembryony in parasitoid wasps. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23: 1807–1819.Google Scholar

Sender, R., Fuchs, S. & Milo, R. (2016). Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLOS Biology, 14 (8): e1002533.Google Scholar

Shefferson, R. P., Jones, O. R. & Salguero-Gómez, R. (2017). The Evolution of Senescence in the Tree of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shen-Miller, J., Mudgett, M. B., Schopf, J. W., Clarke, S. & Berger, R. (1995). Exceptional seed longevity and robust growth: ancient sacred lotus from China. American Journal of Botany, 82: 1367–1380.Google Scholar

Smith, R. J., Matzke-Karasz, R., Kamiya, T. & De Deckker, P. (2016). Sperm lengths of non-marine cypridoidean ostracods (Crustacea). Acta Zoologica, 97: 1–17.Google Scholar

Smith, S. E. & Read, D. J. (2008). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd edn. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Snell, T. W., Kubanek, J., Carter, W. et al. (2006). A protein signal triggers sexual reproduction in Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Marine Biology, 149: 763–773.Google Scholar

Sodmergen, Z. Q. (2010). Why does biparental plastid inheritance revive in angiosperms. Journal of Plant Research, 123: 201–206.Google Scholar

Speijer, D., Lukeš, J. & Eliáš, M. (2015). Sex is a ubiquitous, ancient, and inherent attribute of eukaryotic life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112: 8827–8834.Google Scholar

Spratt, B. G. (2004) Exploring the concept of clonality in bacteria. Methods in Molecular Biology, 266: 323–352.Google Scholar

Stamps, J. & Krishnan, V. V. (1997). Sexual bimaturation and sexual size dimorphism in animals with asymptotic growth after maturity. Evolutionary Ecology, 11: 21–39.Google Scholar

Stanley, J. S. L. (2005). The Entamoeba histolytica genome: something old, something new, something borrowed and sex too? Trends in Parasitology, 21: 451.Google Scholar

Stearns, S. C. (ed.) (1987). The Evolution of Sex and its Consequences. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Stearns, S. C. (1992). The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stenberg, P. & Saura, A. (2009). Cytology of asexual animals. In Lost Sex, ed. Schön, I., Martens, K. & van Dijk, P., Berlin: Springer, pp. 63–74.Google Scholar

Sterelny, K. & Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and Death: an Introduction to the Philosophy of Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Stern, D. L. (1994). A phylogenetic analysis of soldier evolution in the aphid family Hormaphididae. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 256: 203–209.Google Scholar

Stewart, D. T., Saavedra, C., Stanwood, R. R., Ball, A. O. & Zouros, E. (1995). Male and female mitochondrial DNA lineages in the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) species group. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 12: 735–747.Google Scholar

Stewart, E., Madden, R., Paul, G. & Taddei, F. (2005). Aging and death in an organism that reproduces by morphologically symmetric division. PLOS Biology, 3 (2): e45.Google Scholar

Strasburger, E., Noll, F., Schenck, H. & Schimper, A. F. W. (2002). Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen, 35th edn. Heidelberg: Spektrum-Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar

Sweeney, B. W. & Vannote, R. L. (1982). Population synchrony in mayflies: a predator satiation hypothesis. Evolution, 36: 810–821.Google Scholar

Taiz, L. & Zeiger, E. (2010). Plant Physiology, 5th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Tekaya, S., Sluys, R. & Zghal, F. (1997). Sperm transfer and fertilization in the marine planarian Sabussowia dioica (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida, Maricola). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development, 32: 143–147.Google Scholar

Tindale, N. B. (1932). Revision of the Australian ghost moths (Lepidoptera Homoneura, family Hepialidae) Part I. Records of the South Australian Museum, 4: 497–536.Google Scholar

Tinti, F. & Scali, V. (1995). Allozymic and cytological evidence for hemiclonal, all-paternal and mosaic offspring of the hybridogenetic stick insect Bacillus rossius-grandii grandii. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 273: 149–159.Google Scholar

Togashi, T. & Cox, P. A. (2001). Tidal-linked synchrony of gamete release in the marine green alga, Monostroma angicava Kjellman. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 264: 117–131.Google Scholar

Tripp, E. A. & Lendemer, J. C. (2018). Twenty-seven modes of reproduction in the obligate lichen symbiosis. Brittonia, 70: 1–14.Google Scholar

Trumbo, S. T. (2012). Patterns of parental care in invertebrates. In The Evolution of Parental Care, ed. Royle, N. J., Smiseth, P. T. & Kölliker, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 81–100.Google Scholar

Turke, P. W. (2013). Making young from old: how is sex designed to help? Evolutionary Biology, 40: 471–479.Google Scholar

van Dijk, P. (2009). Apomixis: basic for non-botanists. In Lost Sex, ed. Schön, I., Martens, K. & van Dijk, P.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar

van Voorhies, W. A. (1992). Production of sperm reduces nematode lifespan. Nature, 360: 456–458.Google Scholar

Vandel, A. (1928). La parthénogenèse geographique: contribution à l’étude biologique et cytologique de la parthénogenèse naturelle. I. Bulletin Biologique de la France et de la Belgique, 62: 164–281.Google Scholar

Vandel, A. (1931). La parthénogenèse. Paris: G. Doin.Google Scholar

Vanthournout, B., Greve, M., Bruun, A. et al. (2016). Benefits of group living include increased feeding efficiency and lower mass loss during desiccation in the social and inbreeding spider Stegodyphus dumicola. Frontiers in Physiology, 7: 18.Google Scholar

Veller, C., Nowak, M. A., Davis, C. C. & Blasius, B. (2015). Extended flowering intervals of bamboos evolved by discrete multiplication. Ecology Letters, 18: 653–659.Google Scholar

Verne, S., Johnson, M., Bouchon, D. & Grandjean, F. (2012). Effects of parasitic sex ratio distorters on host genetic structure in the Armadillidium vulgare-Wolbachia association. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25: 264–276.Google Scholar

Vershinina, A. O. & Kuznetsova, V. G. (2016). Parthenogenesis in Hexapoda: Entognatha and non-holometabolous insects. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 54: 257–268.Google Scholar

Vila-Farré, M. & Rink, J. C. (2018). The ecology of freshwater planarians. In Planarian Regeneration: Methods and Protocols, ed. Rink, J. C.. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1774. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 173–205.Google Scholar

Vogt, G. (2016). Structural specialties, curiosities and record-breaking features of crustacean reproduction. Journal of Morphology, 277: 1399–1422.Google Scholar

Voigt, K. (2012). Chytridiomycota, Zygomycota. In Syllabus of Plant Families, 13th edn, ed. Frey, W.. Berlin; Stuttgart: Borntraeger, Vol. 1/1, pp. 106–162.Google Scholar

Volff, J.-N. & Schartl, M. (2001). Variability of genetic sex determination in poeciliid fishes. Genetica, 111: 101–110.Google Scholar

Vortsepneva, E., Tzetlin, A., Purschke, G. et al. (2008). The parasitic polychaetes known as Asetocalamyzas laonicola (Calamyzidae) is in fact the dwarf male of the spionid Scolelepis laonicola (comb. nov.). Invertebrate Biology, 124: 403–416.Google Scholar

Wang, H., Matsushita, M., Tomaru, N. & Nakagawa, M. (2017). Sex change in the subdioecious shrub Eurya japonica (Pentaphylacaceae). Ecology and Evolution, 7: 2340–2345.Google Scholar

Warburg, M. R. (2011). Scorpion reproductive strategies, allocation and potential: a partial review. European Journal of Entomology, 108: 173–181.Google Scholar

Waters, E., Hohn, M. J., Ahel, I. et al. (2003). The genome of Nanoarchaeum equitans: insights into early archaeal evolution and derived parasitism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100: 12984–12988.Google Scholar

Weismann, A. (1892). Das Keimplasma. Eine Theorie der Vererbung. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar

Werner, B. (1955). On the development and reproduction of the anthomedusan Margelopsis haeckeli Hartlaub. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 62: 1–29.Google Scholar

Werner, B., (1963). Effect of some environmental factors on differentiation and determination in marine Hydrozoa, with a note on their evolutionary significance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 105: 461–488.Google Scholar

Westneat, D. & Foz, C. (eds.) (2010). Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

White, M. J. D. (1973). Animal Cytology and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

White, M. J. D. (1984). Chromosomal mechanisms in animal reproduction. Bollettino di Zoologia, 51: 1–23.Google Scholar

Whiting, P. W. (1943). Multiple alleles in complementary sex determination of Habrobracon. Genetics, 28: 365–382.Google Scholar

Whittle, C. A., & Extavour, C. G. (2017). Causes and evolutionary consequences of primordial germ-cell specification mode in metazoans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114: 5784–5791.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, M., Sherratt, E., Starace, F. & Gower, D. J. (2013). A new species of skin-feeding caecilian and the first report of reproductive mode in Microcaecilia (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Siphonopidae). PLOS One, 8 (3): e57756.Google Scholar

Williams, C. G. (2009). Conifer Reproductive Biology. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Williamson, D. J. (2006). Hybridization in the evolution of animal form and life-cycle. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 148: 585–602.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. (1999). Biological Individuality: the Identity and Persistence of Living Entities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wolff, N. C., Gandre, S., Kalinin, A. & Gemmell, N. J. (2008). Delimiting the frequency of paternal leakage of mitochondrial DNA in chinook salmon. Genetics, 179: 1029–1032.Google Scholar

Wolpert, L. (2007). Principles of Development, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wourms, J. P. (1981). Viviparity: the maternal–fetal relatioship in fishes. American Zoologist, 21: 473–515.Google Scholar

Wyatt, T. D. (2014). Pheromones and Animal Behavior: Chemical Signals and Signatures, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Yashina, S., Gubin, S., Maksimovich, S. et al. (2012). Regeneration of whole fertile plants from 30,000-y-old fruit tissue buried in Siberian permafrost. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109: 4008–4013.Google Scholar

Yoshizawa, K., Ferreira, R. L., Kamimura, Y. & Lienhard, C. (2014). Female penis, male vagina, and their correlated evolution in a cave insect. Current Biology, 24: 1006–1010.Google Scholar

Zattara, E. E. & Bely, A. E. (2016). Phylogenetic distribution of regeneration and asexual reproduction in Annelida: regeneration is ancestral and fission evolves in regenerative clades. Invertebrate Biology, 135: 400–414.Google Scholar

Zimmer, R. L. (1997). Phoronids, brachiopods, and bryozoans, the lophophorates. In Embryology: Constructing the Organism, ed. Gilbert, S. F. & Raunio, A. M.. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, pp. 279–305.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive