Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:12:58.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Opportunities and Uses of Biochar on Forest Sites in North America

from Part IV - Biochar Application as a Soil Amendment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2016

By
Deborah S. Page-Dumroese ,
Mark D. Coleman  and
Sean C. Thomas
Edited by
Viktor J. Bruckman ,
Esin Apaydın Varol ,
Bașak B. Uzun  and
Jay Liu
Viktor J. Bruckman
Affiliation:
Austrian Academy of Sciences
Esin Apaydın Varol
Affiliation:
Anadolu University, Turkey
Bașak B. Uzun
Affiliation:
Anadolu University, Turkey
Jay Liu
Affiliation:
Pukyong National University, South Korea
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Biochar may be useful for restoring or revitalizing degraded forest soils and help with carbon sequestration, nutrient leaching losses, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, biochar is not currently widely used on forested lands across North America. This chapter provides an overview of several biochar experiments conducted in North America and discusses the feasibility of using in-woods mobile pyrolysis systems to convert excess forest biomass into biochar. Biochar may be applied to forest sites in order to positively influence soil properties (nutrient leaching, water holding capacity), but its biggest benefit may be in facilitating reforestation of degraded or contaminated sites, and in sequestering carbon in soils. The majority of data on biochar applications on forest sites focus on seedling responses and short-term impacts on nutrients, soil physical properties and microbial changes. Long-term field research is necessary to determine water use, carbon sequestration, nutrient use, and greenhouse gas emissions, and the subsequent alteration of forest growth and stand dynamics.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biochar
A Regional Supply Chain Approach in View of Climate Change Mitigation
 , pp. 315 - 335
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbas, D., Current, D., Phillips, M., Rossman, R., Hoganson, H. and Brooks, K. N. (2011). Guidelines for harvesting forest biomass for energy: a synthesis of environmental considerations. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, pp. 4538–4546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, M. M., Benjamin, T. J., Emery, N. C., Brouder, S. J. and Gibson, K. D. (2013). The effect of biochar on native and invasive prairie plant species. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 6, pp. 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameloot, N., Graber, E. R., Verheijen, F. G. A. and De Neve, S. (2013). Interactions between biochar stability and soil organisms: review and research needs. European Journal of Soil Science, 64, pp. 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N., Jones, J. G., Page-Dumroese, D., et al. (2013). A comparison of producer gas, biochar, and activated carbon from two distributed scale thermochemical conversion systems used to process forest biomass. Energies, 6, pp. 164–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, C. J., Fitzgerald, J. D. and Hipps, N. A. (2010). Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant and Soil, 337, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averett, J. M., Klops, R. A., Nave, L. E., Frey, S. D. and Curtis, P. S. (2004). Effects of soil carbon amendment on nitrogen availability and plant growth in an experimental tallgrass prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology, 12, pp. 568–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azargohar, R. and Dalai, A. K. (2006). Biochar as a precursor of activated carbon. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 1131, pp. 762–773.Google Scholar
Bailey, V. L., Fansler, S. J., Smith, J. L. and Bolton, H., Jr. (2011). Reconciling apparent variability in effects of biochar amendment on soil enzyme activities by assay optimization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, pp. 296–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakshi, S., He, Z. L. and Harris, W. G. (2014). Biochar amendment affects leaching potential of copper and nutrient release behavior in contaminated sandy soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 43, pp. 1894–1902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beesley, L. and Marmiroli, M., 2011. The immobilisation and retention of soluble arsenic, cadmium and zinc by biochar. Environmental Pollution, 159, pp. 474–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beesley, L., Inneh, O. S., Norton, G. J., Moreno-Jimenez, E., Pardo, T., Clemente, R. and Dawson, J. J. (2014). Assessing the influence of compost and biochar amendments on the mobility and toxicity of metals and arsenic in a naturally contaminated mine soil. Environmental Pollution, 186, pp. 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biederman, L. A. and Harpole, S. (2013). Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy, 5, pp. 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biochar Solutions Incorporated (BSI) (2011). BSI Biochar Base Unit: Technical Specifications, Version 3.0. Carbondale, CO: Biochar Solutions, Incorporated.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, D. M., Jordan, N. R. and Russelle, M. P. (2003). Soil carbon addition controls weeds and facilitates prairie restoration. Ecological Applications, 13, pp. 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, M. A., Ineson, P., Wookey, P. A. and Lappin-Scott, H. M. (2001). Role of CH4 oxidation, production and transport in forest soil CH4 flux. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 33, pp. 1625–1631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, K. (1997) Evaluation of two techniques for the utilization of logging residues: organic mulch for abandoned road revegetation and accelerated decomposition in small chipped piles. Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers. University of Montana. Paper 2264.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (2009). Biochar production technology. In: Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (eds.) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan, pp. 127–146.Google Scholar
Buford, M. A. and Neary, D. G. (2010). Sustainable biofuels from forests: meeting the challenge. The Ecological Society of America. [online] Available at: http://esa.org/biofuelsreports [Accessed 5 January 2015]Google Scholar
Certini, G. (2005). Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia, 143, pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Liu, X., Zheng, J., Zhang, B., Lu, H., Chi, Z. and Yu, X. (2013). Biochar soil amendment increased bacterial but decreased fungal gene abundance with shifts in community structure in a slightly acid rice paddy from Southwest China. Applied Soil Ecology, 71, pp. 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, C. H., Lehmann, J., Thies, J. E., Burton, S. D. and Engelhard, M. H. (2006). Oxidation of black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes. Organic Geochemistry, 37, pp. 1477–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chintala, R., Mollinedo, J., Schumacher, T. E., Malo, D. D. and Julson, J. L. (2014). Effect of biochar on chemical properties of acidic soils. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 60, pp. 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, M., Page-Dumroese, D., Archuleta, J., et al. (2010). Can portable pyrolysis units make biomass utilization affordable while using biochar to enhance soil productivity and sequester carbon? In: Jain, T. B., Graham, R. T. and Sandquist, J. (technical eds.) Proceedings of the National Silviculture Workshop on Integrated Management of Carbon Sequestration and Biomass Utilization Opportunities in a Changing Climate. ID: RMRS-P-61. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forerst Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, pp. 159–168.Google Scholar
Corbin, J. D. and D’Antonio, C. M. (2004). Can carbon addition increase competitiveness of native grasses? A case study from California. Restoration Ecology, 12, pp. 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, V. H., Joyce, L. A., McNulty, S, Neilson, R. P., et al. (2001). Climate change and forest disturbances. Bioscience, 51, pp. 723–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, R. C. and Allen, D. E. (2008). Greenhouse gas fluxes from natural ecosystems. Australian Journal of Botany, 56, pp. 369–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLuca, T. H. and Aplet, G. H. (2008). Charcoal and carbon storage in forest soils of the Rocky Mountain West. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 6, pp. 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLuca, T. H., MacKenzie, M. D. and Gundale, M. J. (2009). Biochar effects on soil nutrient transformations. In: Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (eds.) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan. pp. 421–454.Google Scholar
Desrochers, L., Puttock, G. and Ryans, M. (1993). The economics of chipping logging residues at roadside: a study of three systems. Biomass & Bioenergy, 5, pp. 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dymond, C. C., Titus, B. D., Stinson, G. and Kurz, W. A. (2010). Future quantities and spatial distribution of harvesting residue and dead wood from natural disturbances in Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 260, pp. 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, M., Kuhn, T. K., Macdonald, L. M., Madden, T. M., et al. (2013). Microbial utilization of biochar-derived carbon. Science of the Total Environment, 465, pp. 288–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fellet, G., Marchiol, L., Delle Vedove, G. and Peressotti, A. (2011). Application of biochar on mine tailing: effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere, 83, pp. 1262–1267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fransham, P. and Badger, P. (2006). Use of mobile fast pyrolysis plants to densify biomass and reduce biomass handling cost – a preliminary assessment. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, pp. 321–325.Google Scholar
Fulton, W., Gray, M., Prahl, F. and Kleber, M. (2013). A simple technique to eliminate ethylene emissions from biochar amendment in agriculture. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 33, pp. 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, N. V., Sackett, T. and Thomas, S. C. (2016). Thermal treatment and leaching biochar alleviates plant growth inhibition from mobile organic compounds. PeerJ. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2385.Google Scholar
Garcia-Perez, M., Lewis, T. and Kruger, C. E. (2011). Methods for producing biochar and advanced biofuels in Washington state. Part 1: Literature review of pyrolysis reactors. Ecology publication Number 11-07-017 Washington State Department of Ecology, Spokane, WA. p. 137. [online] Available at: www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/1107017.pdf [Accessed 1 March 2015]Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. W., Speir, R. A., Harris, K., et al. (2010). Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield. Agronomy Journal, 102, pp. 623–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, J. D., Denef, K., Stewart, C. E., Zheng, J. and Cotrufo, M. F. (2014). Biochar addition rate influences soil microbial abundance and activity in temperate soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 65, pp. 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grygiel, C. E., Jorland, J. E. and Biondini, M. E. (2010). Can carbon and phosphorus amendments increase native forbs in a restoration process? A case study in northern tallgrass prairie (USA). Restoration Ecology, 20, pp. 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundale, M. J. and DeLuca, T. H. (2006). Temperature and source material influence ecological attributes of ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir charcoal. Forest Ecology and Management, 231, pp. 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundale, M. and DeLuca, T. (2007). Charcoal effects on soil solution chemistry and growth of Koeleria macrantha in the ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir ecosystem. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 43, pp. 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, M., Clothier, B., Bound, S., Oliver, G. and Close, D. (2014). Does biochar influence soil physical properties and soil water availability? Plant and Soil, 376, pp. 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrill, H. and Han, H.-S. (2010). Application of hook-lift trucks in centralized logging slash grinding operations. Biofuels, 1, pp. 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, A. E., Larsen, M. J. and Jurgensen, M. F. (1979). Comparative distribution of ectomycorrhizae in soils of three western Montana forest habitat types. Forest Science, 25, pp. 350–358.Google Scholar
Homagain, K., Shahi, C., Luckai, N. and Sharma, M. (2014). Biochar-based bioenergy and its environmental impact in Northwestern Ontario Canada: a review. Journal of Forestry Research, 25, pp. 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBI (International Biochar Initiative) (2012). Standardized product definition and product testing guidelines for biochar that is used in soil. [online] Available at: www.biochar-international.org/sites/default/files/guidelines_for_specifications_of_biochars_for_use_in_soils_January-2012-draft.pdf [Accessed 24 June 2016]Google Scholar
IEA (International Energy Agency) (2002). Sustainable production of woody biomass for energy. Position Paper. [online] Available at: www.ieabioenergy.com/library/157_PositionPaper-SustainableProductionofWoodyBiomassforEnergy.pdf [Accessed 24 June 2016]Google Scholar
IEA (International Energy Agency) (2009). From 1st to 2nd- generation biofuel technologies. [online] Available at: www.iea.org/textbase/publications/index.asp. [Accessed 5 January 2015]Google Scholar
Ippolito, J. A., Laird, D. A. and Busscher, W. J. (2012). Environmental benefits of biochar. Journal of Enviornmental Quality, 41, pp. 967–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishii, T. and Kadoya, K. (1994) Effects of charcoal as a soil conditioner on citrus growth and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal development. Journal of the Japanese Society of Horticultural Science, 63, pp. 529–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, J. M., Page-Dumroese, D. S., Anderson, N. M., Corilo, Y. and Rodgers, R. P. (2014). Characterization of fast pyrolysis products generated from several western USA woody species. Energy & Fuels, 28, pp. 6438–6446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, V., Johnson, M., Krull, E., Daub, M. and Lehmann, J. (2015). Pyrogenic carbon controls across a soil catena in the Pacific Northwest. Catena, 124, pp. 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. L., Murphy, D. V., Khalid, M., Ahmad, W., Edwards-Jones, G. and DeLuca, T. H. (2011). Short-term biochar-induced increase in soil CO2 release is both biotically and abiotically mediated. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43, pp. 1723–1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G., Loeffler, D., Calkin, D. and Chung, W. (2010). Forest treatment residues for thermal energy compared with disposal by onsite burning: emissions and energy return. Biomass & Bioenergy, 34, pp. 737–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinney, T. J., Masiello, C. A., Dugan, B., et al. (2012). Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass & Bioenergy, 41, pp. 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y., Subbotina, I., Chen, H. Q., Bogomolova, I. and Xu, X. L. (2009). Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by C-14 labeling. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41, pp. 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamers, P., Thiffault, E., Paré, D. and Junginger, M. (2013). Feedstock specific environmental risk levels related to biomass extraction for energy from boreal and temperate forests. Biomass & Bioenergy, 55, pp. 212–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, B., Smith, C. T., Titus, B. D, Stupak, I. and Egnell, G. (2009). Environmental factors in woodfuel production: opportunities, risks, and criteria and indicators for sustainable practices. Biomass & Bioenergy, 33, pp. 1321–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. W., Kidder, M., Evans, B. R., et al. (2010). Characterization of biochars produced from cornstovers for soil amendment. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, pp. 7970–7974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehmann, J. (2007). A handful of carbon. Nature, 446, pp. 143–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (eds.) (2009). Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Liu, X., Zhang, A., Ji, C., et al. (2013). Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions – a meta-analysis of literature data. Plant and Soil, 373, pp. 583–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, R. P., Horsley, S. B. and Lilja, P. R. (1997). Impact of forest liming on growth and crown vigor of sugar maple and associated hardwoods. Canadian Journal Forest Research, 27, pp. 1560–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, C. H. (1997). Effectiveness of road ripping. Restoration Ecology, 5, pp. 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, J., Lehmann, J., Rondon, M. and Goodale, C. (2010). Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Global Change Biology, 16, pp. 1366–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangold, J. M. and Sheley, R. L. (2008). Controlling performance of bluebunch wheatgrass and spotted knapweed using nitrogen and sucrose amendments. Western North American Naturalist, 68, pp. 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matovic, D. (2011). Biochar as a viable carbon sequestration option: global and Canadian perspective. Energy, 36, pp. 2011–2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElligott, K. (2011). Biochar Amendments to Forest Soils: Effects on Soil Properties and Tree Growth. Moscow, ID: Master of Science Thesis, University of Idaho.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. J., Simpson, A. J., Soong, R. and Simpson, M. J. (2015). Shifts in microbial community and water-extractable organic matter composition with biochar amendment in a temperate forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 81, pp. 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohan, D., Pittman, C.U., Jr. and Steele, P. H. (2006). Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy & Fuels, 20, pp. 848–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, A. and Lal, R. (2013). Biochar impacts on soil physical properties and greenhouse gas emissions. Agronomy, 3, pp. 313–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, J. M., Lima, I., Xing, B., et al. (2009a). Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals of Environmental Science, 3, pp. 195–206.Google Scholar
Novak, J. M., Busscher, W. J., Laird, D. L., Ahmedna, M., Watts, D. W. and Niandou, M. A. S. (2009b). Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Science, 174, pp. 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyce, G., Basiliko, N., Fulthorpe, R., Sackett, T. E. and Thomas, S. C. (2015) Soil microbial responses over 2 years following biochar addition to north temperate forest. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 51, pp. 649–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuithitikul, K., Srikhun, S. and Hirunpraditkoon, S. (2010). Influences of pyrolysis condition and acid treatment on properties of durian peel-based activated carbon. Bioresource Technology, 101, pp. 426–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page-Dumroese, D. S., Jurgensen, M. and Terry, T. (2010). Maintaining soil productivity during forest biomass-to-energy thinning harvests in the western United States. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 25, pp. 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page-Dumroese, D. S., Robichaud, P. R., Brown, R. E. and Tirocke, J. M. (2015). Water repellency of two forest soils after biochar addition. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 58, pp. 335–342.Google Scholar
Perry, L. G., Galatowitsch, S. M. and Rosen, C. J. (2004). Competitive control of invasive vegetation: a native wetland sedge suppresses Phalaris arundinacea in carbon-enriched soil. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, pp. 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, S. J., Sherlock, R. R., Kelliher, F. M., McSeveny, T. M., Tate, K. R. and Condron, L. M. (2003). Pristine New Zealand forest soil is a strong methane sink. Global Change Biology, 10, pp. 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondon, M. A., Ramirez, J. and Lehmann, J. (2005). Charcoal additions reduce net emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. In: Proceedings of the 3rd USDA Symposium on Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture and Forestry, March 21–24. Baltimore, MD: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Rummer, B., Prestemon, J., May, D., et al. (2003). A Strategic Assessment of Forest Biomass and Fuel Reduction Treatments in Western States. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture. Forest Service, Research and Development.Google Scholar
Sackett, T. E., Basiliko, N., Noyce, G. L., et al. (2014). Soil and greenhouse gas responses to biochar additions in a temperate hardwood forest. GCB Bioenergy, 7, pp. 1062–1074.Google Scholar
Shan, S. (2013). Soil Soluble Nitrogen Pools in Northern Idaho Temperate Forest and Biochar Influence. Moscow, ID: Master of Science Thesis. University of Idaho.Google Scholar
Siitonen, J. (2001). Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecological Bulletins, 49, pp. 11–41.Google Scholar
Smith, J. L., Collins, H. P. and Bailey, V. L. (2010). The effect of young biochar on soil respiration. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 42, pp. 2245–2247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spokas, K. A. and Reicosky, D. C. (2009). Impacts of sixteen different biochars on soil greenhouse gas production. Annals of Environmental Science, 3, pp. 179–193.Google Scholar
Spokas, K. A., Baker, J. M. and Reicosky, D. C. (2010). Ethylene: potential key for biochar amendment impacts. Plant and Soil, 333, pp. 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spokas, K. A., Cantrell, K. B., Novak, J. M., et al. (2012). Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Steinbeiss, S., Gleixner, G. and Antonietti, M. (2009). Effect of biochar amendment on soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41, pp. 1301–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, C., Teixeira, W. G., Lehmann, J., et al. (2007). Long term effects of manure, charcoal, and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant and Soil, 291, pp. 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, C. E., Zheng, J., Botte, J. and Cotrufo, M. F. (2013). Co-generated fast pyrolysis biochar mitigates greenhouse gas emissions and increases carbon sequestration in temperate soils. GCB Bioenergy, 5, pp. 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocks, B. J., Fosberg, M. A., Lynham, T. J., et al. (1998). Climate change and forest fire potential in Russian and Canadian boreal forests. Climate Change, 38, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Switalski, T. A., Bissonette, J. A., DeLuca, T. H., Luce, C. H. and Madej, M. A. (2004). Benefits and impacts of road removal. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 2, pp. 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. C. (2013). Biochar and its potential in Canadian forestry. Silviculture Magazine, January 2013, pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. C., Frye, S., Gale, N., et al. (2013). Biochar mitigates negative effects of salt additions on two herbaceous plant species. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, pp. 62–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, S. C. and Gale, N. (2015). Biochar and forest restoration: a review and meta-analysis of tree responses. New Forests, 46, pp. 931–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyron, E. H. (1948). Effect of charcoal on certain physical, chemical, and biological properties of forest soils. Ecological Monographs, 18, pp. 81–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchimiya, M., Lima, I. M., Klasson, K. T. and Wartelle, L. H. (2010). Contaminant immobilization and nutrient release by biochar soil amendment: roles of natural organic matter. Chemosphere, 80, pp. 935–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Department of Energy (2011). U.S. Billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. R.D. Perlack and B.J. Stokes (leads). ORNL/TM-2011/334. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. 337.Google Scholar
Uslu, A. Faaij, A., and Bergman, P. C. A. (2008). Pretreatment technologies and their effect on international bioenergy supply chain logistics: techno-economic evaluation of torrefaction, fast pyrolysis and pelletization. Energy, 33, pp. 1206–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zwieten, L. V., Singh, B. P. and Cox, J. (2012). Biochar effects on soil properties. In: Cox, J. (ed.) Biochar in Horticulture: Prospects for the Use of Biochar in Australian Horticulture. New South Wales, Australia: Horticulture Australia, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Chapter 4.Google Scholar
Verheijen, F., Jeffery, S., Bastons, A. C., van der Velde, M. and Diafas, I. (2009). Biochar application to soils. A critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes and functions. Office for the Official Publication of the European Communities. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Wang, J. M., Murphy, J. G., Geddes, J. A., Winsborough, C. L., Basiliko, N. and Thomas, S. C. (2013). Methane fluxes measured by eddy covariance and static chamber techniques at a temperate forest in central Ontario, Canada. Biogeosciences, 10, pp. 4371–4382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. A., Nilsson, M. C. and Zackrisson, O. (2008). Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus. Science, 320, pp. 629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warnock, D. D., Lehmann, J., Kuyper, T. W. and Rillig, M. C. (2007). Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil – concepts and mechanisms. Plant and Soil, 300, pp. 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhoit, J. H. and Ling, Q. (1996). Spreader performance evaluation for forest land application of wood and fly ash. Journal of Environmental Quality, 25, pp. 945–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. A. and Layzell, D. B. (2003). A Canadian Biomass Inventory: Feedstocks for a Bio-based Economy. Canada: BIOCAP Canada Foundation Report.Google Scholar
Wright, D. L. and Blaser, R. E. (1981). Establishment of vegetation on graded road cuts as influenced by topsoiling and tillage. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 45, pp: 419–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora-Cristales, R., Sessions, J., Boston, K. and Murphy, G. (2014). Economic optimization of forest biomass processing and transport in the Pacific Northwest USA. Forest Science, 60, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, A. R. (2010). Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar). Environmental Science and Technology, 44, pp. 1295–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, A. R., Gao, B. and Ahn, M.-Y. (2011) Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, pp. 1169–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×