Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:41:54.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commentary: On the Intersection of the Responsibility to Protect, the Protection of Civilians and International Humanitarian Law in Contemporary Armed Conflicts

from Part V - The Interaction Between R2p And Humanitarian Law Obligations To Protect Civilian Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2018

David Turns
Affiliation:
Centre for International Security and Resilience, Cranfield University
Get access

Summary

GENERAL REMARKS

Although the two legal regimes are traditionally kept doctrinally separate for very good reasons to do with the need for international humanitarian law (IHL) to be universally and impartially applied equally by all parties to an armed conflict, there is a valid and interesting case to be made for the intersection of the jus ad bellum and the jus in bello when it comes to notions of humanitarian intervention and the protection of civilians. The latter has been one of the main objectives of IHL since the creation of the International Committee of the Red Cross and the adoption of the first Geneva Convention in 1864, whereas the former – in its most recent guise as the doctrine of the responsibility to protect (R2P) – has featured increasingly prominently in states’ debates on the use of force since at least 1999, when the then British Prime Minister Tony Blair intoned in his celebrated Chicago speech: ‘the principle of non-interference must be qualified in important respects. Acts of genocide can never be a purely internal matter. When oppression produces massive flows of refugees which unsettle neighbouring countries then they can properly be described as “threats to international peace and security”.’ If R2P interventions are oft en predicated upon the substantive violation of civilians’ protection in situations of armed conflict, which is the opposite of perceptions of the legality of actions within the context of an armed conflict (jus in bell o) being influenced by perceptions of the legality of the resort to force in the first place (jus ad bellum), is there – or should there be – a doctrinal link between the two? Although the answer to that question remains negative at the present time, it is at least arguable that a symbiosis in practice is emerging between these two different legal manifestations of humanitarian protection.

It is this symbiosis that is proposed and explored in the thoughtful chapters by Sophie Rondeau and Raphaël van Steenberghe that constitute this Part of the present volume.

Type
Chapter
Information
Beyond Responsibility to Protect
Generating Change in International Law
, pp. 287 - 296
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×