Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T07:56:14.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Behavioural Science and the Irish COVID-19 Response

from Part I - Evidence from Experiments and Behavioural Insights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  aN Invalid Date NaN

Joan Costa-Font
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Matteo M. Galizzi
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we describe the role of behavioural science in the Irish COVID-19 response. The first section describes the onset of COVID-19 in Ireland. The second section outlines the basic structure of the emergency response in Ireland and the role of behavioural science in the national emergency response team. The third section provides an account of specific contributions and capacities provided. We focus on the role of behavioural science during the initial outbreak, in particular the period from March to August 2020, during which Ireland, like many countries, sought to contain the viral spread and respond to issues arising from the fluctuation in the severity of infection exposure.

Type
Chapter
Information
Behavioural Economics and Policy for Pandemics
Insights from Responses to COVID-19
, pp. 220 - 231
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020). How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet, 395(10228), 931934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, P., & Calnan, K. (eds.) (1999). Risk Communication and Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Delaney, L. (2021). Incorporating well-being and mental health research to improve pandemic response. LSE Public Policy Review, 2(2), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ECDC. (2020a). Guidelines for the implementation of non‐pharmaceutical interventions against COVID‐19. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lades, L. K., Laffan, K., Daly, M., & Delaney, L. (2020). Daily emotional well‐being during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Health Psychology, 25(4), 902911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lunn, P. D. (2021). Coronavirus in Ireland: One behavioural scientist’s view. Mind & Society, 20, 229233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunn, P. D., Belton, C. A., Lavin, C., McGowan, F. P., Timmons, S., & Robertson, D. A. (2020a). Using behavioral science to help fight the Coronavirus. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunn, P. D., Timmons, S., Belton, C. A., Barjaková, M., Julienne, H., & Lavin, C. (2020b). Motivating social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic: An online experiment. Social Science & Medicine, 265, 113478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lunn, P. D., Timmons, S., Julienne, H., Belton, C. A., Barjaková, M., Lavin, C., & McGowan, F. P. (2021). Using decision aids to support self-isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychology & Health, 36(2), 195213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, R., & Mooney, R. (2020). A brief case study on using a behaviourally informed poster to improve hand washing in homes. Research Services and Policy Unit, Department of Health.Google Scholar
OECD. (2020). Regulatory policy and COVID-19: Behavioural insights for fast-paced decision making. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/7a521805-enGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, B., Galdo, J. H., Sokler, L., & Freimuth, V. S. (2002). Crisis and emergency risk communication. www.cdc.gov/communications/emergency/cerc.htm.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., et al. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. (2017). Communicating risk in public health emergencies: A WHO guideline for emergency risk communication (ERC) policy and practice. World Health Organization.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2020). COVID-19 global risk communication and community engagement strategy, December 2020–May 2021: Interim guidance, 23 December 2020 (No. WHO/2019-nCoV/RCCE/2020.3). World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×