Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:27:46.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Comprehensive System of Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Non-Repetition

Precedents and Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2019

By
Onur Bakiner
Edited by
James Meernik ,
Jacqueline H. R. DeMeritt  and
Mauricio Uribe-López
James Meernik
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
Jacqueline H. R. DeMeritt
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
Mauricio Uribe-López
Affiliation:
EAFIT University (Medelin, Coloumbia)
Get access

Summary

The Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) announced an agreement on the fifth point of their negotiation agenda, namely attention to victims, in September 2015. The agreement on transitional justice mechanisms to uphold victims’ rights to justice, truth, and reparations marked the conclusion of the most contentious phase of the three-year-long peace talks. Yet the twists and turns of the peace process did not come to an end with the transitional justice agreement: another year of negotiations to finalize the deal, the signing of a first Final Agreement on September 26, 2016, its narrow defeat in a referendum on October 2, 2016, the renegotiation of the earlier deal to arrive at a second Final Agreement in late November 2016, its ratification by Congress a week later, and legislative efforts throughout 2017 to incorporate the components of the Final Agreement into the legal system as FARC members were demobilizing prolonged the drama around the peace process. President Juan Manuel Santos received the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts, even as he had to fight an uphill battle to legislate his peace agenda at home.

Type
Chapter
Information
As War Ends
What Colombia Can Tell Us About the Sustainability of Peace and Transitional Justice
 , pp. 230 - 248
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, Kirsten. (2016). ‘The Great Escape? The Role of the International Criminal Court in the Colombian Peace Process.’ Justice in Conflict, October 13.Google Scholar
Bell, Christine. (2016). “Lex Pacificatoria Colombiana: Colombia’s Peace Accord in Comparative Perspective.” American Journal of International Law 110, 165–171.Google Scholar
Botero, Sandra. (2017). “The 2016 Plebiscite and the Political Challenges of Consolidating a Negotiated Peace in Colombia.” Revista de Ciencia Política 37 (2), 369–388.Google Scholar
Firchow, Pamina. (2017). “Do Reparations Repair Relationships? Setting the Stage for Reconciliation in Colombia.”. International Journal of Transitional Justice 11 (2), 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Godos, Jemima, and Wiig, Henrik. (2014). ‘The Colombian Land Restitution Programme’. Process, Results and Challenges, with Special Emphasis on Women. Oslo: NIBRI Rapport.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. (2013). “Transitional Justice and Colombia’s Peace Talks.” Latin America Report (No. 49).Google Scholar
Landau, David. (2010). “Political Institutions and Judicial Role in Comparative Constitutional Law.” Harv. Int’l LJ 51 (2), 319–377.Google Scholar
Leebaw, Bronwyn Anne. (2008). “The Irreconcilable Goals of Transitional Justice.” Human Rights Quarterly 30 (1), 95–118.Google Scholar
Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla. (2013). Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussio, E., Rettberg, A., and Ugarriza, J. E. (2015). “Victims, Nonvictims and Their Opinions on Transitional Justice: Findings from the Colombian Case.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 9 (2), 336–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olasolo, Héctor, Ramirez, Joel, and Varón, Antonio. (2017). “Have the Colombian Government and the FARC Learnt the Lessons of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission as to the Need to Clearly Define and Prioritize the Main Goals of a Truth Commission?” Harvard Human Rights Journal Available https://harvardhrj.com/online-symposium-on-transitional-justice/.Google Scholar
Sánchez, León, Nelson Camilo, García-Godos, and Vallejo, Catalina. (2016). “Colombia: Transitional Justice before Transition.” In Skaar, Elin, García-Godos, Jemima, and Collins, Cath (eds.) Transitional Justice in Latin America: the Uneven Road from Impunity towards Accountability. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Uprimny, Rodrigo, and Sánchez, Nelson Camilo, (2014). “Law and Reconciliation in Colombia.” Americas Quarterly 8 (4), 50–55.Google Scholar
Villegas, Adriana Rincón, and Freire-Kane, Andrés. (2012). “Lost in Transition: The Legal Pathway for Demobilization in Colombia.” Revista Análisis Internacional (Cesada a Partir de 2015) 1 (5), 19.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×