Book contents
- As War Ends
- As War Ends
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Complexity of the Organizational Design for Implementation of a Peace Accord
- 2 Violence, Grassroots Pressure, and Civil War Peace Processes
- 3 Land, Violence, and the Colombian Peace Process
- 4 Determinants of State Strength and Capacity
- 5 The Threat of Organized Crime in Post-Conflict Colombia
- 6 Violence after Peace
- 7 Two Emblematic Peacebuilding Initiatives in Antioquia
- 8 From Counterinsurgency to Peacebuilding
- 9 Transitional Justice in the Colombian Final Accord
- 10 The Comprehensive System of Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Non-Repetition
- 11 Una Tierra Inexplorada
- 12 Leading the Public to Peace
- 13 Securing the Peace and Promoting Human Rights in Post-Accord Colombia
- 14 Achieving an Unpopular Balance
- 15 Countering Violent Extremism through Narrative Intervention
- 16 Geographies of Truth in the Colombian Transitional Justice Process
- 17 Conclusion
- Index
- References
1 - The Complexity of the Organizational Design for Implementation of a Peace Accord
A Predictable Obstacle to the Peace Agreement with the FARC?1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2019
Book contents
- As War Ends
- As War Ends
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Complexity of the Organizational Design for Implementation of a Peace Accord
- 2 Violence, Grassroots Pressure, and Civil War Peace Processes
- 3 Land, Violence, and the Colombian Peace Process
- 4 Determinants of State Strength and Capacity
- 5 The Threat of Organized Crime in Post-Conflict Colombia
- 6 Violence after Peace
- 7 Two Emblematic Peacebuilding Initiatives in Antioquia
- 8 From Counterinsurgency to Peacebuilding
- 9 Transitional Justice in the Colombian Final Accord
- 10 The Comprehensive System of Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Non-Repetition
- 11 Una Tierra Inexplorada
- 12 Leading the Public to Peace
- 13 Securing the Peace and Promoting Human Rights in Post-Accord Colombia
- 14 Achieving an Unpopular Balance
- 15 Countering Violent Extremism through Narrative Intervention
- 16 Geographies of Truth in the Colombian Transitional Justice Process
- 17 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
The objective of this chapter is to explore the future effect of organizational design on the likelihood of success or failure of the implementation of peace agreements using the Colombian peace accord as a case study. Previous exercises analyzing the implementation of peace agreements in the world have attributed great importance to aspects other than organizational design to explain the success or failure of the implementation. For example, the peace studies literature tends to explain problems in implementation by highlighting the factors associated with the war itself (type of conflict, types of spoils available, etc.) or by giving great importance to political factors (position of relevant actors, level of polarization, etc.) as the variables that explain each success or failure (Stedman, 2001; Hartzell, 2002; Cousens et al., 2003). However, these studies do not consider organizational design as a relevant factor for understanding why implementation processes fail or are successful.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- As War EndsWhat Colombia Can Tell Us About the Sustainability of Peace and Transitional Justice, pp. 22 - 45Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Acuerdo Final para la Terminación del Conflicto y la Construcción de una Paz Estable y Duradera. Versión del 11 de diciembre de 2016.Google Scholar
Aguilar, Luis. (1993). La implementación de las políticas. Mexico: Miguel Ángel Porrúa Grupo Editorial.Google Scholar
Alexander, E. R. (1989) “Improbable Implementation: The Pressman–Wildavsky Paradox Revisited.” Journal of Public Policy 9 (4), 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Paul. (1978). “The Study of Macro-and Micro-Implementation.” Public Policy 26 (2), Spring, 157–184.Google Scholar
Bowen, Elinor R. (1982) “The Pressman-Wildaysky Paradox: Four Addenda or Why Models Based on Probability Theory Can Predict Implementation Success and Suggest Useful Tactical Advice for Implementers.” Journal of Public Policy 2 (1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Chase, Gordon. (1979). “Implementing a Human Services Program: How Hard Will It Be?” Public Policy 27 (4), Autumn, 385–435.Google Scholar
Cousens, Elizabeth, Rothchild, Donald, and Stedman, Stephen (eds.) (2003). Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements. London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
De Leon, Peter, and De Leon, Linda. (2002) “What Ever Happened to Policy Implementation? An Alternative Approach.” Journal of Public Administration and Theory 12 (4), 467–492. http://jpart.oxfordjournals.org/.Google Scholar
Elmore, Richard. (1978) “Organizational Models of Social Program Implementation.” Public Policy 26 (2), 185–228.Translated into Spanish by Gloria Elena Bernal.Google ScholarPubMed
Elmore, Richard. (1979) “Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisión.” Political Science Quarterly 94 (4),1979–1980, 601–616. Translated into Spanish by Gloria Elena Bernal.Google Scholar
Elmore, Richard. (1979–1980). “Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions.” Political Science Quarterly 94 (4), Winter, 601–616.Google Scholar
Goggin, M., Bowman, A., and Lester, J. (1990). Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. Glenwood, IL: Scott Foreman/Little Brown.Google Scholar
Hartzell, Caroline. (2002). “Peace in Stages: The Role of an Implementation Regime in Nicaragua.”In Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Joshi, Madhav, Quinn, Jason, and Regan, Patrick. (2015). “Annualized Implementation Data on Intrastate Comprehensive Peace Accords, 1989–2012.” Journal of Peace Research 52 (4), 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, M., and Lejano, R. P. (2013). “Tales from the Crypt: The Rise and Fall (and Rebirth?) of Policy Design.” Administration & Society 45 (3), 357–381.Google Scholar
Linder, S., and Peters, B. (1984). “From Social Theory to Policy Design.” Journal of Public Policy 4 (3), 237–259.Google Scholar
Malone, David. (2001). “Preface,” in Stedman, Stephen (ed.) 1. Implementing Peace Agreements in Civil Wars: Lessons and Recommendations for Policymakers. New York: International Peace Academy.Google Scholar
O’Toole, Laurence. (2000). “Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2), 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Toole, Laurence. (2004). “The Theory-Practice Issue in Policy Implementation Research.” Public Administration 82 (2), 309–329.Google Scholar
Parsons, Wayne. (2007). Políticas Públicas: Una introducción a la teoría y la práctica del análisis de políticas públicas. Mexico: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Peters, Guy. (2015). Advanced Introduction to Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey and Wildavsky, Aaron. (1973). Implementación. “Cómo grandes expectativas concebidas en Washington se frustran en Oakland”. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. (1986). “Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis.” Journal of Public Policy 6 (1), 21–48.Google Scholar
Saetren, Harald. (2014). “Implementing the Third Generation Research Paradigm in Policy Implementation Research: An Empirical Assessment.” Public Policy and Administration Journal 29 (2), 84–105.Google Scholar
Schneider, A., and Ingram, H. (1988). “Systematically Pinching Ideas: A Comparative Approach to Policy Design.” Journal of Public Policy 8 (1), 61–80.Google Scholar
Stedman, Stephen. (2001). Implementing Peace Agreements in Civil Wars: Lessons and Recommendations for Policymakers. New York: International Peace Academy.Google Scholar
Subirats, Joan. (2008). “La implementación de las políticas,” in Knoepfel, P., Larrue, C., Subirats, J., and Varone, F. (eds.) 183–210. Análisis y gestión de políticas públicas. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Weimer, D. L., and Vining, A. R. (2011). Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar