Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:43:31.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2019

Christopher Whitton
Christopher Whitton
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Arts of Imitation in Latin Prose
Pliny's <I>Epistles</I>/Quintilian in Brief
 , pp. 495 - 530
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S., eds. (2011) Brill’s companion to Callimachus, Leiden.Google Scholar
Adamietz, J. (1966) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber III, Munich.Google Scholar
Adamietz, J. (1986) ‘Quintilians “Institutio oratoria”’, ANRW ii.32.4: 2226–71.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (2003) Bilingualism and the Latin language, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ahlheid, F. (1983) Quintilian. The preface to Book VIII and comparable passages in the Institutio oratoria, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Albaladejo, T., del Rio, E. and Caballero, J. A., eds. (1998) Quintiliano: historia y actualidad de la retórica, 3 vols., Calahorra.Google Scholar
Alberte González, A. (1993) ‘Dialogus de oratoribus versus Institutio oratoria’, Minerva 7: 255–67.Google Scholar
von Albrecht, M. (1964) Silius Italicus: Freiheit und Gebundenheit römischer Epik, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
von Albrecht, M. (1999) Roman epic: an interpretive introduction, Leiden.Google Scholar
Manutius, Aldus (Manuzio, Aldo) (1508) C. Plinii Secundi Novocomensis epistolarum libri decem etc., Venice (with 2nd edn, 1518).Google Scholar
Alexander, M. C. (2002) The case for the prosecution in the Ciceronian era, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Alfonsi, L. (1962) ‘Pliniana’, Aevum 36: 171.Google Scholar
Allen, G. (2000) Intertextuality, London.Google Scholar
Allen, P. S. (1906) Opus epistolarum Des. Erasmi Roterodami. Vol. I: 1484–1518, Oxford.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1993) The Second Sophistic: a cultural phenomenon in the Roman Empire, London.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1982) Essays in Roman satire, Princeton.Google Scholar
André, J.-M. (1983) ‘L’otium chez Quintilien: pédagogie et magistère moral’, in Hommages à Jean Cousin, Paris: 193–206.Google Scholar
André, J.-M. (1991) Le vocabulaire latin de l’anatomie, Paris.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. (2012) Difficillima imitatio: immagine e lessico delle copie tra Grecia e Roma, Rome.Google Scholar
Aricò, G. (1995) ‘Plinio il Giovane e la poesia’, in Storia, letteratura e arte a Roma nel secondo secolo dopo Cristo, Florence: 27–41.Google Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1990) ‘Pline le Jeune et le sublime’, REL 68: 88–98.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (1997) ‘Warped intertextualities: Naevius and Sallust at Tacitus Histories 2.12.2’, Histos 1: 42–50.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2013) ‘Drip-feed invective: Pliny, self-fashioning, and the Regulus letters’, in Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J., eds., The author’s voice in classical and late antiquity, Oxford: 207–30.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2017) Tacitus. Annals book XV, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aßfahl, G. (1932) Vergleich und Metapher bei Quintilian, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Atzert, W. (1949) ‘Praefatio’, in Atzert, W. and Ax, W., M. Tulli Ciceronis. Fasc. 48: De officiis, De uirtutibus, Leipzig: iii–xxxviii.Google Scholar
Audano, S. (2016) ‘Et hominem esse te et hominis patrem: la chiusa di una lettera di Plinio il Giovane (IX 12, 2) e il recupero di una sententia consolatoria’, Aevum 90: 189–203.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A., ed. (2010) Brill’s companion to Silius Italicus, Leiden.Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (2003) ‘Lusus und gloria – Plinius’ hendecasyllabi (Ep. 4, 14; 5, 3 und 7, 4)’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 3–13.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1948) Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber XII, Oxford.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1986) Aeneidos liber sextus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Avenarius, W. (1956) ‘Sallust und der rhetorische Schulunterricht’, Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo. Classe di lettere e scienze morali e storiche 89/90: 343–52.Google Scholar
Ax, W. (2000) ‘Die Geschichtsschreibung bei Quintilian’, in Ax, W. (ed. Grewing, F.), Lexis und Logos: Studien zur antiken Grammatik und Rhetorik, Stuttgart: 209–29.Google Scholar
Ax, W. (2011) Quintilians Grammatik (Inst. orat. 1, 4–8): Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar, Berlin.Google Scholar
Axelson, B. (1941) Das Prioritätsproblem Tertullian – Minucius Felix, Lund.Google Scholar
Axelson, B. (1960) ‘Lygdamus und Ovid. Zur Methodik der literarischen Prioritätsbestimmung’, Eranos 58: 92–111.Google Scholar
Aymard, J. (1951) Essai sur les chasses romaines des origines à la fin du siècle des Antonins (Cynegetica), Paris.Google Scholar
Badius, J. (Ascensius) (1516) M. Fabii Quintiliani Oratoriarum institutionum lib. XII. Vna cum annotationibus etc., Paris.Google Scholar
Baier, T. (2003) ‘Κτῆμα oder ἀγώνισμα: Plinius über historischen und rhetorischen Stil (Epist. 5, 8)’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 69–81.Google Scholar
Baier, T. (2017) ‘Quintilian’s approach to literary history via imitatio and utilitas’, in Bessone and Fucecchi 2017: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C. (1947) Lucretius: De rerum natura, 3 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Balbo, A. (2017) ‘Roman oratory and power under the Flavians: some case studies from Pliny the Younger’, in Bessone and Fucecchi 2017: 83–99.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. (1969) Life and leisure in ancient Rome, London.Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. (2012) ‘Pliny’s epistolary dreams and the ghost of Domitian’, TAPA 142: 105–32.Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. and van den Berg, C., eds. (2013) Intertextuality. AJP 134.1, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1997) ‘Otto punti su una mappa dei naufragi’, MD 39: 209–26. Revised and translated as ‘Some points on a map of shipwrecks’ in Barchiesi, A., Speaking volumes: narrative and intertext in Ovid and other Latin poets, London, 2001: 141–54.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005) ‘The search for the perfect book: a PS to the New Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller, K., ed., The New Posidippus: a Hellenistic poetry book, Oxford: 320–42.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2015) Homeric effects in Virgil’s narrative, Princeton.Google Scholar
Barich, M. (2014) ‘Poet and readers: reflections on the verbal and narrative art of Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica’, in Heerink, M. and Manuwald, G., eds., Brill’s companion to Valerius Flaccus, Leiden: 28–48.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. (1986) ‘The significance of Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus’, HSCP 90: 225–44.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1994) Actors in the audience: theatricality and doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Barwick, K. (1954) Der Dialogus de oratoribus des Tacitus. Motive und Zeit seiner Entstehung, Berlin.Google Scholar
Beall, S. M. (1997) ‘Translation in Aulus Gellius’, CQ 47: 215–26.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2002) ‘Ciceronian correspondences: making a book out of letters’, in Wiseman, T. P., ed., Classics in progress: essays on ancient Greece and Rome, Oxford: 103–44.Google Scholar
Beck, J.-W. (2012) ‘Der Licinianus-Skandal und das crimen incesti (Plinius epist. 4,11)’, GFA 15: 129–52.Google Scholar
Beck, J.-W. (2013) ‘Pro captu lectoris habent sua fata … – Plinius und der Eklat epist. 6,15’, Hermes 141: 294–308.Google Scholar
Beck, J.-W. (2016) ‘incidi in materiam – Plinius und der Delphin (epist. 9,33)’, GFA 19: 61–87.Google Scholar
Behrendt, A. (2013) Mit Zitaten kommunizieren. Untersuchungen zur Zitierweise in der Korrespondenz des Marcus Tullius Cicero, Rahden.Google Scholar
Bellandi, F. (2016) ‘Cronologia e ideologia politica nelle satire di Giovenale’, in Stramaglia, A., Grazzini, S. and Dimatteo, G., eds., Giovenale tra storia, poesia e ideologia, Berlin: 5–63.Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. W. (2008) ‘Each man’s father served as his teacher: constructing relatedness in Pliny’s Letters’, CA 27: 203–30.Google Scholar
Berry, D. (2004) ‘Literature and persuasion in Cicero’s Pro Archia’, in Powell, J. G. F. and Paterson, J., eds., Cicero the advocate, Oxford: 291–311.Google Scholar
Bessone, F. and Fucecchi, M., eds. (2017) The literary genres in the Flavian age: canons, transformations, reception, Berlin.Google Scholar
Billault, A. (2004) ‘Littérature et rhétorique dans le Discours XVIII de Dion Chrysostome Sur l’entraînement à la parole’, REG 117: 504–18.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. (2000a) Onomasticon to the Younger Pliny. Letters and Panegyric, Munich.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. (2000b) ‘The life and death of Cornelius Tacitus’, Historia 49: 230–47.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. (2016) ‘Pliny’s family, Pliny’s career’, in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 51–66.Google Scholar
Bleisch, P. R. (1998) ‘Altars altered: the Alexandrian tradition of etymological wordplay in Aeneid 1.108–12’, AJP 119: 599–606.Google Scholar
Bliss, F. R. (1951) ‘Valerius Maximus and his sources: a stylistic approach to the problem’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. (1973) The anxiety of influence: a theory of poetry, New York.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. (1992) Valerius Maximus and the rhetoric of the new nobility, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. (2007) ‘Roman declamation: the Elder Seneca and Quintilian’, in Dominik and Hall 2007: 297–306.Google Scholar
Boccuto, G. (1990) ‘Sulle idee retoriche di Plinio il Giovane’, in La fortuna e l’opera di Plinio il Giovane. Atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Città di Castello/San Giustino: 111–37.Google Scholar
Boccuto, G. (1991) ‘Plinio Ep. VII 9, 11. Un’affermazione letteraria in distici elegiaci’, A&R 36: 26–36.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. (1995) ‘Minicia Marcella: taken before her time’, AJP 116: 453–60.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. (2015) ‘The publication of Pliny’s letters’, in Marchesi 2015b: 13–108.Google Scholar
Bolkestein, A. M. (1998) ‘Between brackets: (some properties of) parenthetical clauses in Latin. An investigation of the language of Cicero’s letters’, in Risselada, R., ed., Latin in use: Amsterdam studies in the pragmatics of Latin, Amsterdam: 1–17.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. (2016) ‘Particle use in Herodotus and Thucydides’, Hellenic Studies Series, Washington, DC (published online at http://chs.harvard.edu).Google Scholar
Bonner, C. (1941) ‘Desired haven’, Harvard Theological Review 34: 49–67.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. (1949) Roman declamation in the late Republic and early Empire, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Borgo, A. (1989) ‘Allusione e tecnica citazionale in Seneca (Breu. I, 1; Sall. Iug. I, 1)’, Vichiana 18: 45–51.Google Scholar
Borzsák, I. (1969) ‘Quaestiunculae taciteae’, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift Rostock. Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe 18: 391–4.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. (2004) ‘Mountain and molehill? Cornelius Tacitus and Quintus Curtius’, CQ 54: 551–67.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. R. (2010) ‘The exemplary Pliny’, in Deroux, C., ed., Studies in Latin literature and Roman history 15, Brussels: 384–422.Google Scholar
Braund, S.M. (1998) ‘Praise and protreptic in early imperial panegyric: Cicero, Seneca, Pliny’, in Whitby, M., ed., The propaganda of power: the role of panegyric in late antiquity, Leiden: 53–76.Google Scholar
Braund, S.M. (2009) Seneca. De clementia, Oxford.Google Scholar
Briggs, W. D. (1917) ‘Source-material for Jonson’s Underwoods and miscellaneous poems’, Modern Philology 15: 277–312.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1963) Horace on poetry: prolegomena to the literary epistles, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1971) Horace on poetry: the ‘Ars poetica’, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1982) Horace on poetry: Epistles book II. The letters to Augustus and Florus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1989) ‘Quintilian’s De causis corruptae eloquentiae and Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus’, CQ 39: 472–503.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1993) ‘History in the Dialogus de oratoribus and Tacitus the historian: a new approach to an old source’, Hermes 121: 335–49.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1994) ‘Can Tacitus’ Dialogus be dated?’, HSCP 96: 251–80.Google Scholar
Brinton, A. (1983) ‘Quintilian, Plato, and the vir bonus’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 16: 167–84.Google Scholar
Bruère, R. T. (1954) ‘Tacitus and Pliny’s Panegyricus’, CP 49: 161–79.Google Scholar
Bucciarelli, L. (1906) ‘Quintiliano adulatore’, RFIC 34: 321–32.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1977) ‘Catull, Vergil, Martial und Stella in Plinius Epist. 9,25’, SO 52: 83–7.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. (1955) ‘Tacitus und Plinius über die Adoption des römischen Kaisers’, RhM 98: 289–319. Reprinted in Büchner, K., Tacitus und Ausklang. Studien zur römischen Literatur IV, Wiesbaden, 1964: 1–22.Google Scholar
Buchnerus, A. (Buchner, A.) (1644) C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libri X cum notis, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Bühler, W. (1982) Zenobii Athoi proverbia vulgari ceteraque memoria aucta. Vol. IV, libri secundi proverbia 1–40 complexum, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Burmannus, P. (Burmann, P. the Elder) (1720) M. Fabii Quinctiliani. De institutione oratoria libri duodecim. Cum notis etc., 2 vols., Leiden.Google Scholar
Bütler, H.-P. (1970) Die geistige Welt des jüngeren Plinius: Studien zur Thematik seiner Briefe, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Buttmann, (see Spalding 1798–1816).Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1979) ‘Self-imitation within a generic framework: Ovid, Amores 2.9 and 3.11 and the renuntiatio amoris’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 121–41.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1985) ‘Pline le Jeune entre pratique judiciaire et éloquence épidictique’, BAGB 4: 357–74.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1993) Rhetorica ad C. Herennium. Introduzione, testo critico, commento, 2nd edn, Bologna.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (2010) ‘Quintilien et les déclamateurs’, in Galand et al. 2010: 11–28.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. D. E. (2016) ‘The fate of Pliny’s Letters in the late Empire’, in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 463–81.Google Scholar
Canobbio, A. (2015) ‘Echi di Marziale nell’epistola 4.14 di Plinio il Giovane’, Prometheus 41: 189–207.Google Scholar
Canobbio, A. (2017) ‘Elementi Senecani nell’epistola 3.5 di Plinio il Giovane’, Athenaeum 105: 120–36.Google Scholar
Canobbio, A. (2018) ‘Plinio il Giovane, Svetonio e un invito a pubblicare: analisi intertestuale dell’epistola 5.10’, SIFC 16: 52–70.Google Scholar
Caplan, H. (1964) [Cicero] Ad C. Herennium de ratione dicendi (Rhetorica ad Herennium), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (2003) Pliny’s catalogue of culture: art and empire in the Natural History, Oxford.Google Scholar
Carlon, J. (2009) Pliny’s women: constructing virtue and creating identity in the Roman world, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Carlsson, G. (1922) Zur Textkritik der Pliniusbriefe, Lund.Google Scholar
Carruthers, M. (1990) The book of memory, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Carruthers, M. (1998) The craft of thought: meditation, rhetoric, and the making of images, ad 400–1200, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Castagna, L. and Lefèvre, E., eds. (2003) Plinius der Jüngere und seine Zeit, Munich.Google Scholar
Catanaeus, I. M. (Cattaneo, G. M.) (1506) C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libri novem … cum enarrationibus etc., Milan (with 2nd edn, 1518).Google Scholar
Cavallo, G., Fedeli, P. and Giardina, A., eds. (1989) Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, 2 vols., Rome.Google Scholar
Cave, T. (1985) The cornucopian text: problems of writing in the French Renaissance, Oxford.Google Scholar
Celentano, M. S. (2000) ‘Il sesto libro dell’Institutio oratoria di Quintiliano: la trasmissione del sapere, l’attualità storica, l’esperienza autobiografica’, in Calboli Montefusco, L., ed., Papers in rhetoric iii, Bologna: 61–74.Google Scholar
Celentano, M. S. (2003) ‘Book VI of Quintilian’s Institutio oratoria: the transmission of knowledge, historical and cultural topicalities, and autobiographic experience’, in Tellegen-Couperus 2003: 119–28.Google Scholar
Cellarius, C. (Keller, C.) (1693) C. Plinii Secundi Epistolae et Panegyricus etc., Leipzig (with 2nd edn, 1700; 3rd edn, 1711).Google Scholar
Chaplin, J. D. (2000) Livy’s exemplary history, Oxford.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (1995) Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: forme della comunicazione letteraria, Rome.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2004) ‘Martial, Pline le jeune et l’identité du genre de l’épigramme latine’, Dictynna 1: 1–18.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2011) ‘Arte allusiva: Pasquali and onward’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus and Stephens 2011: 566–86.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2017) ‘Antiqui, veteres, novi: images of the literary past and the impulse to progress in the cultural program of Quintilian’, in Bessone and Fucecchi 2017: 19–45.Google Scholar
Cizek, A. N. (1994) Imitatio et tractatio. Die literarisch-rhetorischen Grundlagen der Nachahmung in Antike und Mittelalter, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1965) ‘Der Aufbau des 12. Buches der Institutio oratoria Quintilians’, MH 22: 181–90.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. and Zetzel, J. E. G. (2004) Commentum Cornuti in Persium, Munich.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. J. (1997) ‘Domestici hostes: the Nausicaa in Medea, the Catiline in Hannibal’, MD 39: 165–85.Google Scholar
Cole, C. N. (1906) ‘Quintilian’s quotations from the Latin poets’, CR 20: 47–51.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (1986) ‘The emperor Domitian and literature’, ANRW ii.32.5: 3087–115.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (1988) Statius Silvae IV, Oxford.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (2012) ‘Bureaucratic language in the correspondence between Pliny and Trajan’, TAPA 142: 189–238.Google Scholar
Colson, F. H. (1924) M. Fabii Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber I, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Colton, R. E. (1965) ‘Juvenal’s second Satire and Martial’, CJ 61: 68–71.Google Scholar
Colton, R. E. (1991) Juvenal’s use of Martial’s epigrams: a study of literary influence, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Colvin, S. C. (2006) ‘Atticist–Asianist controversy’, in Sloane, T. O., ed., Encyclopaedia of rhetoric, Oxford.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007) The state of speech: rhetoric and political thought in ancient Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar
Connor, W. R. (1962) ‘Vim quandam incredibilem – a tradition concerning the oratory of Pericles’, C&M 23: 23–33.Google Scholar
Connors, C. (1997) ‘Field and forum: culture and agriculture in Roman rhetoric’, in Dominik, W. J., ed., Roman eloquence: rhetoric in society and literature, London: 71–89.Google Scholar
Consoli, S. (1900) Il neologismo negli scritti di Plinio il Giovane, Palermo.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1974) Memoria dei poeti e sistema letterario: Catullo, Virgilio, Ovidio, Lucano, Turin.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1976) ‘Proemi al mezzo’, RCCM 18: 263–73. Revised and translated as ‘Proems in the middle’, in F. M. Dunn and T. Cole, eds., Beginnings in classical literature, Cambridge, 1992: 147–59.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1981) ‘A proposito dei modelli in letteratura’ (review of West and Woodman 1979b), MD 6: 147–60.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986) The rhetoric of imitation: genre and poetic memory in Virgil and other Latin poets (transl. Segal, C.), Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1992) ‘Rhetoric of imitation as rhetoric of culture: some new thoughts’ (transl. Most, G. W.), Vergilius 38: 45–55.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (2017) Stealing the club from Hercules: on imitation in Latin poetry, Berlin.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. and Barchiesi, A. (1989) ‘Imitazione e arte allusiva: modi e funzioni dell’intertestualità’, in Cavallo, Fedeli and Giardina 1989: i, 81–114.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. and Most, G. (1996) ‘Imitatio (μίμησις)’, in Hornblower, S. and Spawforth, A., eds., The Oxford classical dictionary, 3rd edn, Oxford: 749.Google Scholar
Cook, A. B. (1901) ‘Associated reminiscences’, CR 15: 338–45.Google Scholar
Corke-Webster, J. (2017) ‘The early reception of Pliny the Younger in Tertullian of Carthage and Eusebius of Caesarea’, CQ 67: 247–62.Google Scholar
Cortius, G. (Kortte, G.) and Longolius, P. D. (1734) Caii Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libros decem cum notis selectis, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1980) A commentary on the Satires of Juvenal, London (with corrected reprint, Berkeley 2013).Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1993) The fragmentary Latin poets, Oxford.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1995) Musa lapidaria: a selection of Latin verse inscriptions, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (2003) ‘Notes on Quintilian’, Philologus 147: 360–3.Google Scholar
Cousin, J. (1967) Études sur Quintilien, Amsterdam (orig. 2 vols., Paris 1936).Google Scholar
Cousin, J. (1975–80) Quintilien. Institution oratoire, 7 vols., Paris.Google Scholar
Cova, P. V. (1966) La critica letteraria di Plinio il Giovane, Brescia.Google Scholar
Cova, P. V. (1969) ‘Problemi della lettera pliniana sulla storia’, Aevum 43: 177–99.Google Scholar
Cova, P. V. (1972) ‘Arte allusiva e stilizzazione retorica nelle lettere di Plinio’, Aevum 46: 16–36.Google Scholar
Cova, P. V. (1975) ‘Contributo allo studio della lettera pliniana sulla storia’, RCCM 17: 117–39.Google Scholar
Cova, P. V. (1997) ‘La presenza di Seneca in Plinio il Giovane’, Paideia 52: 95–107.Google Scholar
Cova, P. V. (2001) ‘Plinio il Giovane contro Plinio il Vecchio’, BStudLat 31: 55–67.Google Scholar
Cova, P. V. (2003) ‘Plinio il Giovane contro Quintiliano’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 83–94.Google Scholar
Cova, P. V., Gazich, R., Manzoni, G. E. and Melzani, G. (1990) Aspetti della ‘paideia’ di Quintiliano, Milan.Google Scholar
Cowan, J. (1889) Pliny’s Letters books I and II, London.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. (2014) ‘Fingering Cestos: Martial’s Catullus’ Callimachus’, in Augoustakis, A., ed., Flavian poetry and its Greek past, Leiden: 345–71.Google Scholar
Crook, J. A. (1967) Law and life of Rome, London.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. (1968) Review of Scarcia 1967, RCCM 10: 328–32.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. (1974) ‘Leggendo l’epistolario pliniano’, in Cugusi, P., Ricerche sulla letteratura latina dell’età traianea, Cagliari: 3–38.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. (1983) Evoluzione e forme dell’epistolografia latina nella tarda repubblica e nei primi due secoli dell’impero, Rome.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. (2003) ‘Qualche riflessione sulle idee retoriche di Plinio il Giovane: Epistulae 1, 20 e 9, 26’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 95–122.Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. (1953) European literature and the Latin Middle Ages (transl. Trask, W. R.), London.Google Scholar
Damon, C. (2010) ‘Déjà vu or déjà lu? History as intertext’, PLLS 14: 375–88.Google Scholar
Danesi Marioni, G. (1999) ‘Di padre in figlio: il “vir fortis” in lotta con la fortuna nei due Seneca’, InvLuc 21: 123–32.Google Scholar
Deane, S. N. (1918) ‘Greek in Pliny’s letters’, Classical Weekly 12: 41–4, 50–4.Google Scholar
Dekel, E. (2012) Virgil’s Homeric lens, New York.Google Scholar
Delarue, F. (2004) ‘La sublime et Pline, Ep. IX, 26’, in Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E., eds., Epistulae antiquae III, Leuven: 449–61.Google Scholar
della Casa, A. (1969) Il dubius sermo di Plinio, Genoa.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1976) Of grammatology (transl. Spivak, G. C.), Baltimore.Google Scholar
Deuchler, F. (2017) Quintilian: Nachantike Spuren der Institutio oratoria. Mutmaßungen über das Libro dell’arte von Cennini. Notate zu Sulzers Theorie, Bern.Google Scholar
van Deusen, N. (2013) ‘Cicero through Quintilian’s eyes in the Middle Ages’, in van Deusen, N., ed., Cicero refused to die: Ciceronian influence through the centuries, Leiden: 47–64.Google Scholar
Devillers, O., ed. (2015) Autour de Pline le Jeune. En l’honneur de Nicole Méthy, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Di Brazzano, S. (2004) Laus Pisonis: introduzione, edizione critica, traduzione e commento, Pisa.Google Scholar
Dienel, R. (1915) ‘Quintilian und der Rednerdialog des Tacitus’, WS 37: 239–71.Google Scholar
Dingel, J. (1988) Scholastica materia. Untersuchungen zu den Declamationes minores und der Institutio oratoria, Berlin.Google Scholar
D’Ippolito, G. (2000) ‘Il concetto di intertestualità nel pensiero degli antichi’, in Bécares, V., Pordomingo, F. and Cortés Tovar, R., eds., Intertextualidad en las literaturas griega y latina, Madrid: 13–32.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J. (2007) ‘Tacitus and Pliny on oratory’, in Dominik and Hall 2007: 323–38.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J. and Hall, J., eds. (2007) A companion to Roman rhetoric, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. A., eds. (2009) Writing politics in imperial Rome, Leiden.Google Scholar
Döpp, S. (1985) ‘Cicero-Rezeption bei Quintilian am Beispiel von inst. orat. 12, 2, 23–26’, WS 98: 159–71.Google Scholar
Döpp, S. (1986) ‘Die Nachwirkung von Ciceros rhetorischen Schriften bei Quintilian und in Tacitus’ Dialogus. Eine typologische Skizze’, in Neukam, P., ed., Reflexionen antiker Kulturen, Munich: 7–26.Google Scholar
Döpp, S. (2008) ‘Verecundia in Institutio oratoria 12,5,1–4: Wie Quintilian Cicero, De oratore 1,119–122 und Seneca, Epistulae morales 11 rezipiert’, GFA 11: 241–7.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2000) Le stylet et la tablette. Dans le secret des auteurs antiques, Paris.Google Scholar
Doulamis, K., ed. (2011) Echoing narratives: studies of intertextuality in Greek and Roman prose fiction, Groningen.Google Scholar
Dozier, C. A. (2012) ‘Poetry, politics, and pleasure in Quintilian’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M., eds., Aesthetic value in classical antiquity, Leiden: 345–63.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2001) ‘How to make (and break) a Cicero: epideixis, textuality and self-fashioning in the Pro Archia and In Pisonem’, CA 20: 35–77.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005) Making a new man: Ciceronian self-fashioning in the rhetorical works, Oxford.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R. P. (2016) ‘The finances of a senator’, in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 89–106. Modified reprint of Duncan-Jones, R. P., The economy of the Roman Empire, 2nd edn, Cambridge, 1982: 17–32.Google Scholar
Dupont, F. (1997) ‘Recitatio and the reorganization of the space of public discourse’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A., eds., The Roman cultural revolution, Cambridge: 44–59.Google Scholar
Durry, M. (1938) Pline le Jeune. Panégyrique de Trajan. Préfacé, édité et commenté, Paris.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2010) ‘Cicero’s abridgement of his speeches for publication’, in Horster, M. and Reitz, C., eds., Condensing texts – condensed texts, Stuttgart: 369–74.Google Scholar
Earl, D. C. (1961) The political thought of Sallust, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eck, W. (2001) ‘Die große Pliniusinschrift aus Comum: Funktion und Monument’, in Bertinelli, G. A. and Donati, A., eds., Varia epigraphica, Faenza: 225–35. Revised version in Eck, W., Monument und Inschrift: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur senatorischen Repräsentation in der Kaiserzeit, Berlin, 2010: 299–310.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1992) Interpretation and overinterpretation, ed. Collini, S., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the reading of Roman poetry, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (2015) ‘Pliny the Younger on his verse and Martial’s non-recognition of Pliny as a poet’, HSCP 108: 309–60.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. (2008) ‘Hunting for boars with Tacitus and Pliny’, CA 27: 35–58.Google Scholar
Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (2002) ‘Panegyrik, Denkmal und Publikum: Plinius, Brief 8,4 und die Kommemoration der Dakertriumphe im Orts- und Medienwandel’, in Auffarth, C. and Rüpke, J., eds., Ἐπιτομὴ τῆς οἰκουμένης. Studien zur römischen Religion in Antike und Neuzeit, Stuttgart: 113–37.Google Scholar
Ellendt, F. T. (1840) M. Tulli Ciceronis De oratore libri tres, 2 vols., Königsberg.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. (2015) ‘The epic vantage-point: Roman historiographical allusion reconsidered’, Histos 9: 277–311.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2014) ‘Introduction’, in Elsner and Meyer 2014: 1–34.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Meyer, M., eds. (2014) Art and rhetoric in Roman culture, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Emlein, F. (1907) De locis quos ex Ciceronis orationibus in Institutionis oratoriae duodecim libris laudavit Quintilianus, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Ernst, W. (2014) ‘Plinius, Epistulae 8.14: Abstimmungsprobleme im römischen Senat’, Fundamina 20: 240–57.Google Scholar
Eussner, A. (1881) ‘Adversarien’, Blätter für das bayerische Gymnasialschulwesen 17: 385–94.Google Scholar
Evans, M. (1983) ‘Italian manuscript illumination 1460–1560’, in Kren, T., ed., Renaissance painting in manuscripts: treasures from the British Library, London: 87–141.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1978a) ‘Imitation and evolution: the discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero De oratore 2. 87–97’, CP 73: 1–16.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1978b) ‘Imitation and decline: rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, CP 73: 102–16.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1982) ‘Quintilian on performance: traditional and personal elements in Institutio 11.3’, Phoenix 36: 243–63.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1988) ‘Varietas and satietas: De oratore 3.96–103 and the limits of ornatus’, Rhetorica 6: 275–90.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2002) ‘Commenting on commentaries: a pragmatic postscript’, in Gibson, R. K. and Kraus, C. S., eds., The classical commentary: histories, practices, theory, Leiden: 403–21.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2011) Roman readings: Roman response to Greek literature from Plautus to Statius and Quintilian, Berlin.Google Scholar
Faranda, R. and Pecchiura, P. (1979) Marco Fabio Quintiliano. L’istituzione oratoria, 2nd edn, 2 vols., Turin.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil’s Georgics and the traditions of ancient epic: the art of allusion in literary history, Oxford.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1997) ‘The Virgilian intertext’, in Martindale, C., ed., The Cambridge companion to Virgil, Cambridge: 222–38.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2005) ‘Intention and intertext’, Phoenix 59: 98–111.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1984) ‘Arte allusiva’, in della Corte, F., ed., Enciclopedia virgiliana, Rome: i, 346–7.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (2013) ‘Free spirits: Sallust and the citation of Catiline’, AJP 134: 49–66.Google Scholar
Felgentreu, F. (2015) ‘Κτῆμα ἐς ἀεί. Überlegungen zu Eigentum und Historiographie in den Plinius-Briefen’, in Almazova, N., Egorova, S., Keyer, D. and Verlinsky, A., eds., XAPAKTHP ARETAΣ. Donum natalicium Bernardo Seidensticker ab amicis oblatum. Hyperboreus 20, St Petersburg and Munich: 317–30.Google Scholar
Fernández López, J. (2007) ‘Quintilian as rhetorician and teacher’, in Dominik and Hall 2007: 307–22.Google Scholar
Finkelpearl, E. D. (1998) Metamorphosis of language in Apuleius: a study of allusion in the novel, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (2007) ‘The letter’s the thing (in Pliny, Book 7)’, in Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D., eds., Ancient letters: classical and late antique epistolography, Oxford: 191–210.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (2016) Variety: the life of a Roman concept, Chicago.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (2018) ‘Pliny and Martial: dupes and non-dupes in the early Empire’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 108–25.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2017) ‘Gattungsvielfalt in den Briefen des Jüngeren Plinius: Episteln im Spannungsfeld von ethischer Unterweisung und literarischer Pluridimensionalität’, Gymnasium 124: 21–60.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1983) ‘An acrostic in Virgil (Aeneid 7.601–4)?’, CQ 33: 298.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1997) ‘On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and classical studies’, MD 39: 13–34. Reprinted in Fowler, D., Roman constructions: readings in postmodern Latin, Oxford, 2000: 294–308.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2010) ‘Horatius anceps: persona and self-revelation in satire and song’, in Davis, G., ed., A companion to Horace, Malden, MA: 271–90.Google Scholar
Froesch, H. H. (1968) Ovids Epistulae ex Ponto I–III als Gedichtsammlung, Bonn.Google Scholar
Galand, P., Hallyn, F., Lévy, C. and Verbaal, W., eds. (2010) Quintilien ancien et moderne, Turnhout.Google Scholar
Gallent-Kočevar, H. (1933) ‘Über die Sentenzen des jüngeren Plinius’, Mitteilungen des Vereines klassischer Philologen in Wien 10: 58–62.Google Scholar
Gallia, A. B. (2012) Remembering the Roman republic: culture, politics, and history under the principate, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gamberini, F. (1983) Stylistic theory and practice in the Younger Pliny, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Gazda, E. K., ed. (2002) The ancient art of emulation: studies in artistic originality and tradition from the present to classical antiquity, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Gazich, R. (1990) ‘Teoria e pratica dell’ “exemplum” in Quintiliano’, in Cova et al. 1990: 61–141.Google Scholar
Gazich, R. (2003) ‘Retorica dell’esemplarità nelle Lettere di Plinio’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 123–41.Google Scholar
Gellérfi, G. (2013) ‘The Institutes of oratory as inspiration and source for Juvenal’, Graeco-Latina Brunensia 18: 85–93.Google Scholar
Gervais, K. (2017) Statius, Thebaid 2, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gesner, J. M. C. (1738) M. Fabii Quinctiliani De institutione oratoria libri duodecim, 2 vols., Göttingen.Google Scholar
Gesner, J. M. C. (1739) Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libri decem. Eiusdem Gratiarum actio sive Panegyricus, Leipzig (with 2nd edn, ed. Ernesti, A. W., 1770).Google Scholar
Geue, T. (2018) ‘Forgetting the Juvenalien in our midst: literary amnesia in the Satires’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 366–84.Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. (1967) ‘Arte allusiva and Alexandrian poetry’, CQ 17: 85–97.Google Scholar
Gianotti, G. F. (1979) ‘Il principe e il retore: classicismo come consenso in età imperiale’, Sigma 12: 67–83.Google Scholar
Gibson, B. J. (2006) Statius, Silvae 5, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gibson, B. (2010) ‘Silius Italicus: a consular historian?’, in Augoustakis 2010: 47–72.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2003) ‘Pliny and the art of (in)offensive self-praise’, Arethusa 36: 235–54.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2007) Excess and restraint: Propertius, Horace and Ovid’s Ars Amatoria, London.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2011a) ‘Elder and better: the Naturalis historia and the Letters of the Younger Pliny’, in Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R., eds., Pliny the Elder: themes and contexts, Leiden: 187–206.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2011b) ‘<Clarus> confirmed? Pliny, Epistles 1.1 and Sidonius Apollinaris’, CQ 61: 655–9.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2013a) ‘Pliny and the letters of Sidonius: from Constantius and Clarus to Firminus and Fuscus’, Arethusa 46: 333–55.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2013b) ‘Starting with the index in Pliny’, in Jansen, L., ed., Paratextuality and the reader in Roman literature and culture, Cambridge: 33–55.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2013c) ‘Reading Sidonius by the book’, in van Waarden, J. and Kelly, G., eds., New approaches to Sidonius Apollinaris, Leuven: 195–219.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2015) ‘Not dark yet: reading to the end of the nine-book collection’, in Marchesi 2015b: 185–222.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2018) ‘Pliny and Plutarch’s practical ethics: a newly rediscovered dialogue’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 402–21.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (forthcoming) Pliny the Younger. Epistles book VI, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. (2012) Reading the letters of Pliny the Younger: an introduction, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. and Steel, C. (2010) ‘The indistinct literary careers of Cicero and Pliny the Younger’, in Hardie, P. and Moore, H., eds., Classical literary careers and their reception, Cambridge: 118–37.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. and Whitton, C. L., eds. (2016) The Epistles of Pliny. Oxford readings in classical studies, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gierig, G. E. (1796) C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Panegyricus Traiano dictus. Recensuit notisque illustravit G. E. G., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gierig, G. E. (1800–2) C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Epistolarum libri decem, 2 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2007a) Paideia Romana: Cicero’s Tusculan disputations. CCJ Supplement 30, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2007b) ‘Virgil vs. Ennius, or: the undoing of the annalist’, in Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E., eds., Ennius perennis: the Annals and beyond. CCJ Supplement 31, Cambridge: 73–102.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, B. L. and Lodge, G. (1958) Gildersleeve’s Latin grammar, 3rd edn, London.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1994) Making men: sophists and self-presentation in ancient Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar
Glen, L. (2016) ‘The announcement: Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus as the prelude to his Annales’, unpublished MA dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Glücklich, H.-J. (2003) Die Briefe Plinius des Jüngeren im Unterricht, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Gnilka, C. (1973) ‘Trauer und Trost in Plinius’ Briefen’, SO 49: 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (1999) ‘Appreciating Aper: the defence of modernity in Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus’, CQ 49: 224–37.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2009) ‘The faces of eloquence: the Dialogus de oratoribus’, in Woodman 2009c: 73–84.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2017) ‘The limits of the case study: exemplarity and the reception of classical literature’, New Literary History 48: 415–35.Google Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1964) Review of Mynors 1963, Phoenix 18: 320–8.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (1993) The loaded table. Representations of food in Roman literature, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2012) Horace. Satires book I, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. (2005) Empire and memory: the representation of the Roman republic in imperial culture, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowing, A. (2013) ‘Tully’s boat: responses to Cicero in the imperial period’, in Steel, C., ed., The Cambridge companion to Cicero, Cambridge: 233–50.Google Scholar
Graff, R. (2001) ‘Reading and the “written style” in Aristotle’s Rhetoric’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly 31: 19–44.Google Scholar
Grant, R. (1948) ‘Pliny and the Christians’, Harvard Theological Review 41: 273–4.Google Scholar
Greene, T. M. (1982) The light in Troy: imitation and discovery in Renaissance poetry, New Haven.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1982) ‘The creation of characters in the Aeneid’, in Gold, B. K., ed., Literary and artistic patronage in ancient Rome, Austin, TX: 118–34.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1999) ‘Pliny and Tacitus’, SCI 18: 139–58. Reprinted in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 355–77.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (2007) ‘The Younger Pliny’s debt to moral philosophy’, HSCP 103: 451–81.Google Scholar
Gruenwald, E. (1883) Quae ratio intercedere videatur inter Quintiliani institutionem oratoriam et Taciti dialogum, Berlin.Google Scholar
Gualandri, I. (1979) Furtiva lectio: studi su Sidonio Apollinare, Milan.Google Scholar
Gudeman, A. (1914) P. Cornelii Taciti Dialogus de oratoribus. Mit Prolegomena etc., 2nd edn, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Guillemin, A-M. (1929) Pline et la vie littéraire de son temps, Paris.Google Scholar
Guillemin, A-M. (1946) ‘La culture de Pline le Jeune’, in Mélanges dédiés à la mémoire de Félix Grat, Paris: i, 77–88.Google Scholar
Guillemin, A-M. (1953–62) Pline le Jeune. Lettres I–IX, 3 vols., 2nd edn, Paris.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (1997) ‘Catullus, Pliny, and love-letters’, TAPA 127: 201–31.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2009) ‘The rhetoric of rhetorical theory’, in Gunderson, E., ed., The Cambridge companion to ancient rhetoric, Cambridge: 109–25.Google Scholar
Güngerich, R. (1948) ‘Tutilius, 1’, RE ii.7: 1613–14.Google Scholar
Güngerich, R. (1951) ‘Der Dialogus des Tacitus und Quintilians Institutio oratoria’, CP 46: 159–64. Reprinted in Pöschl, V., ed., Tacitus, Darmstadt 1969: 349–60.Google Scholar
Güngerich, R. (1955) Review of Barwick 1954 and E. Paratore, Ancora del ‘Dialogus de oratoribus’ (1954), Gnomon 27: 439–43.Google Scholar
Güngerich, R. (1956) ‘Tacitus’ Dialogus und der Panegyricus des Plinius’, Festschrift Bruno Snell, Munich: 145–52.Google Scholar
Güngerich, R. (1980) Kommentar zum Dialogus des Tacitus (completed by Heubner, H.), Göttingen.Google Scholar
Gurd, S. A. (2012) Work in progress: literary revision as social performance in ancient Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (2017) ‘Contests of style and uses of the middle in canon making’, in Cojannot-Le Blanc, M., Pouzadoux, C. and Prioux, E., eds., L’Héroïque et le champêtre. Volume II. Appropriation et déconstruction des théories stylistiques dans la pratique des artistes et dans les modalités d’exposition des œuvres, Paris: 15–31.Google Scholar
Håkanson, L. (1986) ‘Die quintilianischen Deklamationen in der neueren Forschung’, ANRW ii.32.4: 2272–306.Google Scholar
Håkanson, L. (2014) Unveröffentlichte Schriften. Band 1. Studien zu den pseudoquintilianischen ‘Declamationes maiores’, ed. Santorelli, B., Berlin.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2002) The aesthetics of mimesis: ancient texts and modern problems, Princeton.Google Scholar
Halm, C. (Halm, K. F.) (1868–9) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae libri duodecim, 2 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hanaghan, M. (2017) ‘Micro allusions to Pliny and Virgil in Sidonius’s programmatic epistles’, IJCT 24: 249–61.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (1997–8) ‘Juvenal, Domitian, and the accession of Hadrian (Satire 4)’, BICS 42: 117–44.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1989) ‘Flavian epicists on Virgil’s epic technique’, Ramus 18: 3–30.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1994) Virgil. Aeneid book IX, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2004) ‘Ovidian middles’, in Kyriakidis, S. and de Martino, F., eds., Middles in Latin poetry, Bari: 151–82.Google Scholar
Harries, J. D. (2013) ‘The senatus consultum Silanianum: court decisions and judicial severity in the early Roman Empire’, in du Plessis, P., ed., New frontiers: law and society in the Roman world, Edinburgh: 51–70.Google Scholar
Harrill, J. A. (2017) ‘“Without lies or deception”: oracular claims to truth in the Epistle to Titus’, New Testament Studies 63: 451–72.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1980) ‘Towards a study of the Roman slave trade’, MAAR 36: 117–40. Reprinted in Harris, W. V., Rome’s imperial economy: twelve essays, Oxford, 2011: 57–87.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. L. (1981) ‘Vergil and the Homeric tradition’, PLLS 3: 209–25.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2013) Framing the Ass: literary form in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford.Google Scholar
Haß, C. D. and Noller, E. M., eds. (2015) Was bedeutet Ordnung – was ordnet Bedeutung?, Berlin.Google Scholar
Haß-von Reitzenstein, U. (1970) Beiträge zur gattungsgeschichtlichen Interpretation des ‘Dialogus de oratoribus’, Cologne.Google Scholar
Häußler, R. (1986) ‘Aktuelle Probleme der Dialogus-Rezeption: Echtheitserweise und Lückenumfang. Ein Zwischenbilanz’, Philologus 130: 69–95.Google Scholar
Häußler, R. (1987) ‘Abermals: Plinius’ Eberjagden’, Philologus 131: 82–5.Google Scholar
Haynes, H. (forthcoming) ‘Tyranny, self and genre in Pliny’s Letter 5.8’.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1999) ‘Longinus, On sublimity’, PCPS 45: 43–74.Google Scholar
Hedrick, C. W. Jr. (2000) History and silence: purge and rehabilitation of memory in late antiquity, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Heldmann, K. (1980) ‘Dekadenz und literarischer Fortschritt bei Quintilian und bei Tacitus. Ein Beitrag zum römischen Klassizismus’, Poetica 12: 1–12.Google Scholar
Heldmann, K. (1982) Antike Theorien über Entwicklung und Verfall der Redekunst, Munich.Google Scholar
Helm, R. (1940) ‘Beiträge zur Quellenforschung bei Valerius Maximus’, RhM 89: 241–73.Google Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey (1972) ‘The lekythos and Frogs 1200–1248’, HSCP 76: 133–43.Google Scholar
Henderson, John (1998) Fighting for Rome: poets and Caesars, history and civil war, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henderson, John (2001a) ‘On Pliny on Martial on Pliny on anon … (Epistles 3.21/Epigrams 10.19)’, Ramus 30: 57–88.Google Scholar
Henderson, John (2001b) ‘Going to the dogs/Grattius <&> the Augustan subject’, PCPS 47: 1–22.Google Scholar
Henderson, John (2002a) Pliny’s statue: the Letters, self-portraiture, and classical art, Exeter.Google Scholar
Henderson, John (2002b) ‘Knowing someone through their books: Pliny on Uncle Pliny (Epistles 3.5)’, CP 97: 256–84. Reprinted in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 378–416.Google Scholar
Henderson, John (2003) ‘Portrait of the artist as a figure of style: P.L.I.N.Y’s Letters’, Arethusa 36: 115–25.Google Scholar
Herescu, N. I. (1956) ‘Le mode de composition des écrivains (“dictare”)’, REL 34: 132–46.Google Scholar
Herrmann, L. (1955) ‘Quintilien et le Dialogue des orateurs’, Latomus 14: 349–69.Google Scholar
Herrmann, L. (1965) ‘Encore le “Dialogue des orateurs” et Quintilien’, Latomus 24: 845–57.Google Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. (1995) ‘Pliny the poet’, G&R 42: 168–81.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S. and Hainsworth, J. B. (1988) A commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Volume I: introduction and books I–VIII, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hidber, T. (1996) Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass, Stuttgart. Republished Berlin, 2012.Google Scholar
Hillgruber, M. (1999) Die pseudoplutarchische Schrift De Homero. Teil 2. Kommentar zu den Kapiteln 74–218, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hindermann, J. (2011) ‘Verliebte Delphine, schwimmende Inseln und versiegende Quellen beim älteren und jüngeren Plinius: mirabilia und ihre Erzählpotenz (epp. 4,30; 8,20; 9,33)’, Gymnasium 118: 345–54.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1987) The metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the self-conscious Muse, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1993) ‘Medea in Ovid: scenes from the life of an intertextual heroine’, MD 30: 9–47.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and intertext: dynamics of appropriation in Roman poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (2010) ‘Between formalism and historicism’, in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W., eds., The Oxford handbook of Roman studies, Oxford: 369–85.Google Scholar
Hine, H. (2005) ‘Poetic influence on prose: the case of the younger Seneca’, in Reinhardt, Lapidge and Adams 2005: 211–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, H. (2016) ‘Philosophi and philosophy: from Cicero to Apuleius’, in Williams, G. D. and Volk, K., eds., Roman reflections: studies in Latin philosophy, Oxford: 13–29.Google Scholar
Hirschberg, T. (1992) ‘Zu Quintilian, inst. 1 praef. 3’, Hermes 120: 249–50.Google Scholar
Hoffer, S. E. (1999) The anxieties of Pliny the Younger, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Hoffer, S. E. (2016) ‘Models of senators and emperors: Regulus, the bad senator (Epistles 1.5)’, in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 289–331.Google Scholar
Holcomb, C. (2001) ‘“The crown of all our study”: improvisation in Quintilian’s Institutio oratoria’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly 31: 53–72.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (2001) ‘Getting away with murder: the literary and forensic fortune of two Roman exempla’, IJCT 7: 489–514.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (2003) Aulus Gellius: an Antonine scholar and his achievements, rev. edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. and Vardi, A., eds. (2004) The worlds of Aulus Gellius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1996) ‘Exempla und mos maiorum: Überlegungen zum “kollektiven Gedächtnis” der Nobilität’, in Gehrke, H-J. and Möller, A., eds., Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt: Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewußtsein, Tübingen: 301–38. Reprinted with addenda in Hölkeskamp, K.-J., Senatus populusque Romanus: Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen, Stuttgart, 2004: 169–98.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2003) ‘Ikonen der virtus. Exemplarische Helden(-taten) im monumentalen Gedächtnis der römischen Republik’, in Barzanò, A., Bearzot, C. and Landucci Gattinoni, F., eds., Modelli eroici dall’antichità alla cultura europea, Rome: 213–37.Google Scholar
Hooley, D. M. (1997) The knotted thong: structures of mimesis in Persius, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1979) ‘Doctus sermones utriusque linguae?’, EMC 23: 79–95.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1993) ‘Allusion in the Georgics’ (review of Farrell 1991), CR 43: 44–7.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1996) Review of Citroni 1995, Vergilius 42: 157–60.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1998) Virgil, Aeneid 2. A commentary, Leiden.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2003) Virgil, Aeneid 11. A commentary, Leiden.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2016) The epic distilled: studies in the composition of the Aeneid, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2006) The shadow of Callimachus: studies in the reception of Hellenistic poetry at Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2009a) Critical moments in classical literature: studies in the ancient view of literature and its uses, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2009b) ‘The Trojan oration of Dio Chrysostom and ancient Homeric criticism’, in Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A., eds., Narratology and interpretation: the content of narrative form in ancient literature, Berlin: 43–61.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2010) ‘Rhythmical language and poetic citation in Greek narrative texts’, in Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A., eds., I papiri del romanzo antico, Florence: 233–45.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2012) Plato and the traditions of ancient literature: the silent stream, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2014) Hesiodic voices: studies in the ancient reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2016) ‘The Hippias minor and the traditions of Homeric criticism’, CCJ 62: 85–107.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (forthcoming) ‘Callimachus and the description of rhetorical style’, in Perale, M. et al., eds., Hellenistic poetry before Callimachus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1993) Latin literature from Seneca to Juvenal: a critical study, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1998) Cicero’s correspondence: a literary study, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2011) ‘Politics and the sublime in the Panegyricus’, in Roche 2011: 125–41.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2013) Greek to Latin: frameworks and contexts for intertextuality, Oxford.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. (2007) ‘Aristotle: the written and the performative styles’, in Mirhady, D. C., ed., Influences on peripatetic rhetoric, Leiden: 151–68.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. (2011) ‘The Panegyricus and rhetorical theory’, in Roche 2011: 67–84.Google Scholar
Iordache, R. (1990) ‘Algunas influencias de Cicerón y Quintiliano en el estilo de Plinio el Joven’, Helmantica 41: 189–99.Google Scholar
Irwin, W. (2004) ‘Against intertextuality’, Philosophy and Literature 28: 227–42.Google Scholar
Janka, M. (2015) ‘Plinius und die Poesie. Von der Freizeitdichtung zur Literaturtheorie’, Gymnasium 122: 597–618.Google Scholar
Janson, T. (1964) Latin prose prefaces: studies in literary conventions, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, R. L. (1987) ‘The infirmitas of Messalla Corvinus’, Latomus 46: 196–8.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1979) ‘Vergilius cacozelus (Donatus, Vita Vergilii 44)’, PLLS 2: 67–142.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2000) ‘Toward a sociology of reading in classical antiquity’, AJP 121: 593–627.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2010) Readers and reading culture in the High Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2013) ‘Pliny Epistle 9.36 and Demosthenes’ cave’, CW 106: 665–8.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N. (2009) Ancient literacies: the culture of reading in Greece and Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. (1968) ‘A new commentary on the letters of Pliny’, Phoenix 22: 111–42.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. (1969) ‘Julius Naso and Julius Secundus’, HSCP 72: 279–88.Google Scholar
Jones, F. (1988) ‘Notes on Quintilian and [Quintilian]’, CQ 38: 568–9.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. (2012) ‘Dionysius and Longinus on the sublime: rhetoric and religious language’, AJP 133: 271–300.Google Scholar
Joseph, T. A. (2012) Tacitus the epic successor. Virgil, Lucan, and the narrative of civil war in the Histories, Leiden.Google Scholar
Jouanno, C. (2005) ‘Thersite, une figure de la démesure?’, Kentron 21: 181–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallendorf, C. W. (1994) ‘Brevitas’, in Ueding 1994: 53–60.Google Scholar
Kasten, H. (1984) Gaius Plinius Caecilius Secundus: Briefe, 2 vols., 4th edn, Munich.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (1995) C. Suetonius Tranquillus: De grammaticis et rhetoribus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (1998) ‘Becoming “CICERO”’, in Knox, P. E. and Foss, C., eds., Style and tradition: studies in honor of Wendell Clausen, Stuttgart: 248–63.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (2005) Emotion, restraint and community in ancient Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Keeline, T. (2013) ‘The literary and stylistic qualities of a Plinian letter: a commentary on Plin. Ep. 7.9’, HSCP 107: 189–224.Google Scholar
Keeline, T. (2018a) The reception of Cicero in the early Roman Empire: the rhetorical schoolroom and the creation of a cultural legend, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keeline, T. (2018b) ‘Model or anti-model? Pliny on Uncle Pliny’, TAPA 148: 173–203.Google Scholar
Keil, H. (1870) C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri novem etc., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. (2008) Ammianus Marcellinus: the allusive historian, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. (2018) ‘From Martial to Juvenal (Epigrams 12.18)’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 160–79.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. M. (1976) Studies in the civil judicature of the Roman republic, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1957) ‘The ancient dispute over rhetoric in Homer’, AJP 78: 23–35.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1969) Quintilian, New York.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1998) ‘Quintilian on retirement’, in Albaladejo, del Rio and Caballero 1998: i, 153–8.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (2007) Aristotle. The art of rhetoric. A theory of civic discourse, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (2013) Quintilian: a Roman educator and his quest for the perfect orator (rev. edn of Kennedy 1969), sine loco.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1958) ‘Nequitiae poeta’, in Herescu, N. I., ed., Ovidiana: recherches sur Ovide (Paris) 201–9.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1979) ‘Iudicium transferendi: Virgil, Aeneid 2.469–505 and its antecedents’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 103–20.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1982) ‘Books and readers in the Roman world’, in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V., eds., The Cambridge history of classical literature. II. Latin literature (Cambridge) 3–32.Google Scholar
Ker, J. (2004) ‘Nocturnal writers in imperial Rome: the culture of lucubratio’, CP 99: 209–42.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. A. (2002) ‘Criticism in Quintilian’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. T. (1990) The rhetoric of Cicero’s Pro Cluentio, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kirsch, D. (2010) ‘Thinking with external representations’, AI & Society 25: 441–54.Google Scholar
Klodt, C. (2012) ‘Patrem mira similitudine exscripserat. Plinius’ Nachruf auf eine perfekte Tochter (epist. 5, 16)’, Gymnasium 119: 23–61.Google Scholar
Klodt, C. (2015) ‘Das Grabmal des Verginius Rufus (Plinius, epist. 2,1, 6,10 und 9,19)’, Gymnasium 122: 339–87.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. (1973) ‘Das Problem der Ironie bei Tacitus’, MH 30: 32–50.Google Scholar
König, A. R. and Whitton, C. L. (2018a) ‘Introduction’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 1–34.Google Scholar
König, A. R. and Whitton, C. L., eds. (2018b) Roman literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: literary interactions, ad 96–138, Cambridge.Google Scholar
König, J. (2007) ‘Fragmentation and coherence in Plutarch’s Sympotic questions’, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T., eds., Ordering knowledge in the Roman Empire, Cambridge: 43–68.Google Scholar
Kousser, R. (2015) ‘Adapting Greek art’, in Borg, B. E., ed., A companion to Roman art, Malden, MA: 114–29.Google Scholar
Kragelund, P. (2012) ‘Tacitus, Dio, and the “sophist” Maternus’, Historia 61: 495–506.Google Scholar
Krasser, H. (1993) ‘extremos pudeat rediisse – Plinius im Wettstreit mit der Vergangenheit. Zu Vergilzitaten beim jüngeren Plinius’, Antike und Abendland 39: 144–54.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M. (1998) ‘Why do we gesture when we speak?’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 7: 54–9.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. B. (2006) ‘Leonides Laco quidem simile apud Thermopylas fecit: Cato and Herodotus’, BICS 49: 93–103.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. B. (2016) ‘Thucydides in Gaul: the siege of Plataea as Caesar’s model for his siege of Avaricum’, Histos 10: 1–14.Google Scholar
Krevans, N. (2011) ‘Callimachus’ philology’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus and Stephens 2011: 118–33.Google Scholar
Kroh, K. (2015) ‘Der laute und der leise Plinius. Vom Umgang mit exemplarischen Ordnungen in epist. 3,1 und 3,5’, in Haß and Noller 2015: 71–96.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1924) Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. A. (2001) Cicero, Catullus and the language of social performance, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kühn, W. (1985) Plinius der Jüngere. Panegyrikus: Lobrede auf den Kaiser Trajan, Darmstadt (with 2nd edn, 2008).Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. (1912) Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Zweiter Teil: Satzlehre, 2nd edn, 2 vols., Hanover.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. (1967) Herkunft und soziale Stellung der römischen Juristen, 2nd edn, Weimar.Google Scholar
Kunst, C. (1917) ‘De Aeschine Rhodi exulante’, WS 39: 167–70.Google Scholar
Labate, M. (1984) L’arte di farsi amare: modelli culturali e progetto didascalico nell’elegia ovidiana, Pisa.Google Scholar
La Bua, G. (2014) ‘Cicero’s Pro Milone and the “Demosthenic” style: De optimo genere oratorum 10’, G&R 61: 29–37.Google Scholar
Lana, I. (1951) Quintiliano, il ‘sublime’ e gli ‘esercizi preparatori’ di Elio Teone, Turin.Google Scholar
Lana, I. (1973) La teorizzazione della collaborazione degli intellettuali con il potere politico in Quintiliano, Institutio oratoria, libro XII, Turin.Google Scholar
Lana, I. (1974) ‘L’ultimo libro dell’Institutio oratoria di Quintiliano: la fondazione teoretica della collaborazione dell’oratore con il principe’, Hispania Romana: colloquio italo-spagnolo, Rome: 149–65.Google Scholar
Lange, A. G. (1811) ‘Dialogus de oratoribus Tacito vindicatus’, in Beck, C. D., ed., Acta seminarii regii et societatis philologicae Lipsiensis. Vol. I, Leipzig: 77–88. Reprinted in Lange, A. G. (ed. Jacob, K.), Vermischte Schriften und Reden, Leipzig, 1832: 3–14.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2011) ‘Roman exempla and situation ethics: Valerius Maximus and Cicero de Officiis’, JRS 101: 1–23.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2014) ‘Pliny’s “role models of both sexes”: gender and exemplarity in the Letters’, Eugesta 4: 214–37.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2018) ‘Extratextuality: literary interactions with oral culture and exemplary ethics’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 330–46.Google Scholar
Lanham, R. A. (1983) The electronic word: democracy, technology, and the arts, Chicago.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. (2003) ‘Quintiliano, l’impero, le istituzioni’, in Uglione, R., ed., Atti del convegno nazionale di studi ‘Intellettuali e potere nel mondo antico’, Alessandria: 139–63.Google Scholar
Last, D. M. and Ogilvie, R. M. (1958) ‘Claudius and Livy’, Latomus 17: 476–87.Google Scholar
Lauletta, M. (1998) L’intreccio degli stili in Tacito: intertestualità prosa-poesia nella letteratura storiografica, Naples.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (1998) Handbook of literary rhetoric (transl./ed. Bliss, M. T. et al.), Leiden.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. (2018) ‘Pliny Epistles 10 and imperial correspondence: the Empire of letters’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 280–301.Google Scholar
Lawrence, S. J. (2015) ‘Dead on time: Valerius Maximus 9.13 and Stoicism’, Antichthon 49: 135–55.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (2003) ‘Otium as luxuria: economy of status in the Younger Pliny’s Letters’, Arethusa 36: 147–65.Google Scholar
Lee, A. G. (1958–9) ‘The date of Lygdamus and his relationship to Ovid’, PCPS 185: 15–23.Google Scholar
Lee, A. G. (1971) Allusion, parody and imitation. St John’s College Cambridge lecture, Hull.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (1963) Orationis ratio: the stylistic theories and practice of the Roman orators, historians and philosophers, 2 vols., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. and Pinkster, H. (1981) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore libri III. Band I: Buch 1, 1–165, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Nelson, L. W. (1985) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore libri III. Band II: Buch I, 166–265; Buch II, 1–98, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Rabbie, E. (1989) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore libri III. Band III: Buch II, 99–290, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Wisse, J. (1996) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore libri III. Band IV: Buch II, 291–367; Buch III, 1–95, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1978) ‘Plinius-Studien II: Diana und Minerva. Die beiden Jagd-Billette an Tacitus (1,6; 9,10)’, Gymnasium 85: 37–47. Reprised in Lefèvre 2009: 246–50.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1989) ‘Plinius-Studien V: Vom Römertum zum Ästhetizismus: Die Würdigungen des Älteren Plinius (3,5), Silius Italicus (3,7) und Martial (3,21)’, Gymnasium 96: 113–28. Revised version in Lefèvre 2009: 123–6, 142–5 and 157–9.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1996) ‘Plinius-Studien VII: Cicero das unerreichbare Vorbild (1,2; 3,15; 4,8; 7,4; 9,2)’, Gymnasium 103: 333–53. Reprised in Lefèvre 2009: 111–22.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2003) ‘Plinius’ Klage um die verlorengegangene Würde des Senats (3, 20; 4, 25)’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 189–200. Reprised in Lefèvre 2009: 93–101.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2009) Vom Römertum zum Ästhetizismus: Studien zu den Briefen des jüngeren Plinius, Berlin.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2004) ‘Quintilian on the emotions (Institutio oratoria 6 preface and 1–2)’, JRS 94: 122–40.Google Scholar
Lemoine, F. J. (1991) ‘Parental gifts: father–son dedications and dialogues in Roman didactic literature’, ICS 16: 337–66.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1878) L. Annaei Senecae tragoediae. I. De Senecae tragoediis observationes criticae, Berlin.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. (1997) ‘God and man in the classical Latin panegyric’, PCPS 43: 66–103.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. (2010) Livy on the Hannibalic war, Oxford.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. (2011) ‘Historical allusion and the nature of the historical text’, Histos working papers 2011.01.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. (2015) ‘Allusions and intertextuality in Livy’s third decade’, in Mineo, B., ed., A companion to Livy, Malden, MA: 205–16.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2010) ‘Note sur un aspect de Quintilien lecteur de Cicéron: sceptiques et stoïciens dans l’Institution oratoire’, in Galand et al. 2010: 109–24.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. D. (1879) The letters of the Younger Pliny, London.Google Scholar
Lillo Redonet, F. (2001) Palabras contra el dolor: la consolación filosófica latina de Cicerón a Frontón, Madrid.Google Scholar
Lion, H. (1895) Plinii minoris epistulae quid ad pueros educandos aptum praebeant, Paris.Google Scholar
Locatellus, B. (1493) Quintilianus cum commento, Venice.Google Scholar
Löfstedt, E. (1949) ‘Reminiscence and imitation. Some problems in Latin literature’, Eranos 47: 148–64.Google Scholar
Lorenz, S. (2014) ‘Martial und Quintilian (Epigr. 2.90)’, Gymnasium 121: 45–68.Google Scholar
Lovatt, H. (2010) ‘Interplay: Silius and Statius in the games of Punica 16’, in Augoustakis 2010: 155–76.Google Scholar
Lowry, C. J. (1975) ‘The influence of Quintilian on the historical works of Tacitus’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1993) ‘Reading and response in Tacitus’ Dialogus’, in Luce, T. J. and Woodman, A. J., eds., Tacitus and the Tacitean tradition, Princeton: 11–38.Google Scholar
Ludolph, M. (1997) Epistolographie und Selbstdarstellung: Untersuchungen zu den ‘Paradebriefen’ Plinius des Jüngeren, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Lyne, Raphael (2016) Memory and intertextuality in Renaissance literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1987) Further voices in Vergil’s Aeneid, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1994) ‘Vergil’s Aeneid: subversion by intertextuality. Catullus 66.39–40 and other examples’, G&R 41: 187–204.Google Scholar
Macrae, D. E. (2015) ‘Invitus invitam: a window allusion in Suetonius’ Titus’, CQ 65: 415–18.Google Scholar
Magie, D. M. (1950) Roman rule in Asia minor. To the end of the third century after Christ, 2 vols., Princeton.Google Scholar
Maguinness, W. S. (1968) Review of Cova 1966, CR 18: 117.Google Scholar
Malloch, S. J. V. (2013) The Annals of Tacitus. Book 11, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2015) Valerius Flaccus. Argonautica book III, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. and Voigt, A., eds. (2013) Flavian epic interactions, Berlin.Google Scholar
Manzoni, G. E. (1990) ‘Il retore Quintiliano di fronte ai filosofi’, in Cova et al. 1990: 143–72.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. (2008) The art of Pliny’s letters: a poetics of allusion in the private correspondence, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. (2013) ‘Silenced intertext: Pliny on Martial on Pliny (on Regulus)’, AJP 134: 101–18.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. (2015a) ‘The unbalanced dinner between Martial and Pliny: one topos in two genres’, in Devillers 2015: 117–29.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I., ed. (2015b) Pliny the book-maker: betting on posterity in the Epistles, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I., (2018) ‘The Regulus connection: displacing Lucan between Martial and Pliny’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 349–65.Google Scholar
Margolin, J.-C. (1994) ‘Copia’, in Ueding 1994: 385–94.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2011) ‘Intertextuality and exempla’, Histos working papers 2011.03.Google Scholar
de Marinis, T. (1947) La biblioteca napoletana dei re d’Aragona. Vol. I, Milan.Google Scholar
Martin, R. H. and Woodman, A. J. (1989) Tacitus. Annals IV, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marvin, M. (2008) The language of the Muses: the dialogue between Greek and Roman sculpture, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Maselli, G. (1973–4) ‘Sulle idee letterarie di Plinio il Giovane’, Annali della Facoltà di Lingue e Lettere Straniere dell’Università di Bari n.s. 4–5: 137–74.Google Scholar
Maslakov, G. (1978) ‘Tradition and abridgement: a study of the exempla tradition in Valerius Maximus and the Elder Pliny’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Macquarie.Google Scholar
Mastrorosa, I. G. (2010) ‘La pratica dell’oratoria giudiziaria nell’alto impero: Quintiliano e Plinio il Giovane’, in Galand et al. 2010: 125–52.Google Scholar
May, J. M. (1990) ‘The monologistic dialogue as a method of literary criticism: Cicero, Brutus 285–289 and Horace, Epistle 2.1.34–39’, Athenaeum 78: 177–80.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (2001) Tacitus. Dialogus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (2010) ‘Ipsa verba: Tacitus’ verbatim quotations’, in Fuhrer, T. and Nelis, D., eds., Acting with words: communication, rhetorical performance and performative acts in Latin literature, Heidelberg: 129–42.Google Scholar
Mayhoff, C. (1897) C. Plini Secundi Naturalis historiae libri XXXVII. Vol. IV: Libri XXIII–XXX, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mayor, J. E. B. (1872) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber decimus. Part 1, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mayor, J. E. B. (1880) Pliny’s Letters book III, London.Google Scholar
Mayor, J. E. B. (1886) Thirteen satires of Juvenal, 4th edn, London.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, M. (2016) ‘A revisionist history of Cicero’s Letters’, Mouseion 13: 35–63.Google Scholar
McDermott, W. C. (1936) ‘The ape in Roman literature’, TAPA 67: 148–67.Google Scholar
McDermott, W. C. and Orentzel, A. E. (1979) ‘Quintilian and Domitian’, Athenaeum 67: 9–26.Google Scholar
McElduff, S. (2013) Roman theories of translation: surpassing the sources, London.Google Scholar
McGill, S. (2005) Virgil recomposed: the mythological and secular centos in antiquity, New York.Google Scholar
McGill, S. (2012) Plagiarism in Latin literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. (1987) Ovid: Amores: text, prolegomena and commentary. Vol. 1, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Meierotto, J. H. L. (1787) Prog. in Plinii Epist. III, 5. Nullum librum tam malum esse, ut non aliqua parte prodesset, Berlin.Google Scholar
Merrill, E. T. (1919) Selected letters of the Younger Pliny, 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar
Merwald, G. (1964) Die Buchkomposition des jüngeren Plinius (Epistulae I–IX), Erlangen.Google Scholar
Mesk, J. (1911) ‘Zur Quellenanalyse des Plinianischen Panegyricus’, WS 33: 71–100.Google Scholar
Méthy, N. (2002) ‘Les secrets de l’âme humaine. Sur une réminiscence cicéronienne dans la correspondance de Pline le Jeune’, in Defosse, P., ed., Hommages à C. Deroux II, Brussels: 303–14.Google Scholar
Méthy, N. (2004) ‘Lettre d’art et vie sociale: les citations dans la correspondance de Pline le Jeune’, in Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E., eds., Epistulae antiquae iii, Leuven: 463–76.Google Scholar
Méthy, N. (2007) Les lettres de Pline le Jeune. Une représentation de l’homme, Paris.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1993) ‘Ovidian allusion and the vocabulary of memory’, MD 30: 153–64.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. (1869) ‘Zur Lebensgeschichte des jüngeren Plinius’, Hermes 3: 31–139. Corrected reprint in Mommsen, T., Gesammelte Schriften iv (ed. O. Hirschfeld), Berlin, 1906: 366–468.Google Scholar
Morawski, C. (1895) De sermone scriptorum Latinorum aetatis quae dicitur argenteae observationes, Lviv. Also in Eos 2: 1–13.Google Scholar
Morello, R. (2003) ‘Pliny and the art of saying nothing’, Arethusa 36: 187–209.Google Scholar
Morello, R. (2015) ‘Pliny book 8: two viewpoints and the pedestrian reader’, in Marchesi 2015a: 144–84.Google Scholar
Moreno Soldevila, R. (2010) Plinio el Joven. Panegírico de Trajano, Madrid.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. and Harrison, S. J. (2008) ‘Intertextuality’, in Whitmarsh, T., ed., The Cambridge companion to the Greek and Roman novel, Cambridge: 218–36.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (1998a) Literate education in the Hellenistic and Roman worlds, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (1998b) ‘A good man skilled in politics: Quintilian’s political theory’, in Too, Y. L. and Livingstone, N., eds., Pedagogy and power: rhetorics of classical learning, Cambridge: 245–62.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (2004) ‘Educational values’, in Holford-Strevens and Vardi 2004: 187–205.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (2007) Popular morality in the early Roman Empire, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mratschek, S. (2017) ‘The letter collection of Sidonius Apollinaris’, in Sogno, C., Sorin, B. K. and Watts, E. J., eds., Late antique letter collections: a critical introduction and reference guide, Oakland, CA: 309–36.Google Scholar
Mratschek, S. (2018) ‘Images of Domitius Apollinaris in Pliny and Martial: intertextual discourses as aspects of self-definition and differentiation’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 208–32.Google Scholar
Muckelbauer, J. (2003) ‘Imitation and invention in antiquity: an historical-theoretical revision’, Rhetorica 61–88.Google Scholar
Murgia, C. W. (1980) ‘The date of Tacitus’ Dialogus’, HSCP 84: 89–125.Google Scholar
Murgia, C. W. (1985) ‘Pliny’s letters and the Dialogus’, HSCP 89: 171–206. Pages 191–202 reprinted in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 146–58.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1963) C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri decem, Oxford (with corrected reprint, 1968).Google Scholar
Nathan, M. J. (2008) ‘An embodied cognition perspective on symbols, gesture, and grounding instruction’, in de Vega, M., Glenberg, A. and Graesser, A., eds., Symbols and embodiment: debates on meaning and cognition, Oxford: 375–96.Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. (2002) Poetry for patrons: literary communication in the age of Domitian, Leiden.Google Scholar
Neger, M. (2015) ‘Pliny’s Martial and Martial’s Pliny: the intertextual dialogue between the Letters and the Epigrams’, in Devillers 2015: 131–44.Google Scholar
Neuhausen, K. A. (1968) ‘Plinius proximus Tacito: Bemerkungen zu einem Topos der römischen Literaturkritik’, RhM 111: 333–57.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. (2009) ‘Statius’ self-conscious poetics: hexameter on hexameter’, in Dominik, Garthwaite and Roche 2009: 387–404.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. (1998) ‘The survival of Cicero’s letters’, in Deroux, C., ed., Studies in Latin literature and Roman history IX, Brussels: 63–105.Google Scholar
Niemirska-Pliszczyńska, J. (1955) De elocutione Pliniana in epistularum libris nouem conspicua quaestiones selectae, Lublin.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970) A commentary on Horace’s Odes, Book 1, Oxford.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1915) Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance, 3rd edn, 2 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Odgers, M. M. (1933) ‘Quintilian’s use of earlier literature’, CP 28: 182–8.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. (2006) ‘Intertextuality, time and historical understanding’, in Macfie, A. L., ed., The philosophy of history, London: 102–17.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. (2009) ‘Intertextuality and historiography’, in Feldherr, A., ed., A companion to the Roman historians, Cambridge: 231–42.Google Scholar
Oliva, A. (1993) ‘Plinio Ep. V, 8, 11 e Tucidide I, 22, 4’, Athenaeum 81: 279–83.Google Scholar
Orr, M. (2003) Intertextuality: debates and contexts, Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (1992) Alcidamas, Aristophanes, and the beginnings of Greek stylistic theory, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Otto, A. (1890) Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Pagán, V. E. (2010) ‘The power of the epistolary preface from Statius to Pliny’, CQ 60: 194–201.Google Scholar
Paoli, U. E. (1960) Plinio. Lettere scelte, 3rd edn, Florence.Google Scholar
Papanghelis, T. D. (1999) ‘Relegens errata litora: Virgil’s reflexive “Odyssey”’, in Kazazis, J. N. and Rengakos, A., eds., Euphrosyne: studies in ancient epic and its legacy in honor of Dimitris N. Maronitis, Stuttgart: 275–90.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. (2009) ‘Books and reading Latin poetry’, in Johnson and Parker 2009: 186–229.Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. (1942) ‘Arte allusiva’, L’italia che scrive 25: 185–7. Reprinted in Pasquali, G., Pagine stravaganti, Florence, 1968: ii, 275–82.Google Scholar
Pausch, D. (2004) Biographie und Bildungskultur. Personendarstellungen bei Plinius dem Jüngeren, Gellius und Sueton, Berlin.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2012) The rhetoric of the Roman fake: Latin pseudepigrapha in context, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2013) ‘Non subripiendi causa sed palam mutuandi: intertextuality and literary deviancy between law, rhetoric, and literature in Roman imperial culture’, AJP 134: 83–100.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2013) ‘Intertextuality, plausibility, and interpretation’, Histos 7: 1–20.Google Scholar
Pelttari, A. (2014) The space that remains: reading Latin poetry in late antiquity, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Pennacini, A., ed. (2001) Quintiliano, Institutio oratoria, 2 vols., Turin.Google Scholar
Penwill, J. L. (2000) ‘Quintilian, Statius and the lost epic of Domitian’, Ramus 29: 60–83.Google Scholar
Pepe, L. (1958) ‘Petronio conosce l’epistolario di Plinio’, GIF 11: 289–94.Google Scholar
Pérez Durà, F. J. (1997) ‘El prohoemium del llibre sisè de la Institutio oratoria. Estudi lingüístic i literari’, in Homenatge a Miquel Dolç, Palma de Mallorca: 125–9.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (1993) La rhétorique de l’éloge dans le monde gréco-romaine, 2 vols., Paris.Google Scholar
Perry, E. E. (2002) ‘Rhetoric, literary criticism, and the Roman aesthetics of artistic imitation’, in Gazda 2002: 153–71.Google Scholar
Perry, E. E. (2005) The aesthetics of emulation in the visual arts of ancient Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peter, H. (1901) Der Brief in der römischen Literatur, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Peterson, W. (1891) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber decimus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of classical scholarship: from the beginnings to the end of the Hellenistic age, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pfister, M. (1985) ‘Konzepte der Intertextualität’, in Broich, U. and Pfister, M., eds., Intertextualität: Formen, Funktionen, anglistische Fallstudien, Tübingen: 1–30.Google Scholar
Pflips, H. (1973) Ciceronachahmung und Ciceroferne des jüngeren Plinius: Ein Kommentar zu den Briefen des Plinius über Repetundenprozesse (epist. 2,11; 2,12; 3,9; 4,9; 5,20; 6,13; 7,6), Bamberg.Google Scholar
Picone, G. (1978) L’eloquenza di Plinio: teoria e prassi, Palermo.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, A. (2010) ‘To Silius through Livy and his predecessors’, in Augoustakis 2010: 27–45.Google Scholar
Porter, W. M. (1990) ‘Cicero’s Pro Archia and the responsibilities of reading’, Rhetorica 8: 137–52.Google Scholar
Posch, S. (1983) ‘Eine Eberjagd mit Gänsefüßchen (Zu Plinius, ep. I, 6)’, in Händel, P. and Meid, W., eds., Festschrift für Robert Muth, Innsbruck: 375–83.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (1999) ‘Cicero’s translations from Greek’, in Powell, J. G. F., ed., Cicero the philosopher, Oxford: 273–300.Google Scholar
Power, T. J. (2010) ‘Pliny, Letters 5.10 and the literary career of Suetonius’, JRS 100: 140–62.Google Scholar
Preisendanz, C. (1908) ‘De L. Annaei Senecae rhetoris apud philosophum filium auctoritate’, Philologus 67: 68–112.Google Scholar
Press, J. (1966) The fire and the fountain, London.Google Scholar
Prete, S. (1948) Saggi pliniani, Bologna.Google Scholar
Procchi, F. (2010) Plinio il Giovane e la difesa di C. Iulius Bassus: tra norma e persuasione, Pisa.Google Scholar
Pucci, J. (1998) The full-knowing reader: allusion and the power of the reader in the western literary tradition, New Haven.Google Scholar
Quadlbauer, F. (1948) Plinius der Jüngere und der Begriff der erhabenen Rede, Graz.Google Scholar
Quadlbauer, F. (1958) ‘Die genera dicendi bis Plinius d. J.’, WS 71: 55–111.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (1907–35) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae libri XII, 2 vols., Leipzig. Reprinted with additions by Buchheit, V., Leipzig 1959.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (1951) Artium scriptores: Reste der voraristotelischen Rhetorik, Vienna.Google Scholar
Radice, B. (1969) Pliny. Letters and Panegyricus, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Ratti, S. (2015) ‘Relire le Satyricon: Pline le Jeune et les chrétiens, cibles du roman secret d’un affranchi cultivé’, Anabases 22: 99–145.Google Scholar
Rayment, C. S. (1969) ‘Echoes of the declamations in the dialogues of the Younger Seneca’, CB 45: 61–3.Google Scholar
Rees, R. (2001) ‘To be and not to be: Pliny’s paradoxical Trajan’, BICS 45: 149–68.Google Scholar
Regius, R. (Regio, R.) (1493) ‘Raphaelis Regii in deprauationes oratoriae Quintiliani institutionis annotationes’, in Locatellus 1493.Google Scholar
Reiff, A. (1959) Interpretatio, imitatio, aemulatio: Begriff und Vorstellung literarischer Abhängigkeit bei den Römern, Cologne.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, A. (2015) ‘Reproduktion und Bild. Zur Wiederholung und Vervielfältigung von Reliefbildern und -objekten in römischer Zeit’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Humboldt University, Berlin.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, A. (2018) ‘Delectari varietate: Zur Erklärung der repetitiven Darstellung auf dem “Puteal Tegel”’, in Dietrich, N. and Squire, M. J., eds., Ornament and figure in Graeco-Roman art: rethinking visual ontologies in Classical antiquity, Berlin: 299–326.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M. and Adams, J. N., eds. (2005) Aspects of the language of Latin prose, Oxford.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. and Winterbottom, M. (2006) Quintilian. Institutio oratoria Book 2, Oxford.Google Scholar
Reitzenstein, R. (1915) ‘Bemerkungen zu den kleinen Schriften des Tacitus’, Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Phil.-hist. Kl. aus dem Jahre 1914: 173–276. Reprinted in Reitzenstein, R., Aufsätze zu Tacitus, Darmstadt, 1967: 17–120.Google Scholar
Renehan, R. (1976) ‘A traditional pattern of imitation in Sallust and his sources’, CP 71: 97–105.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (1983) ‘The Younger Pliny’, in Reynolds, L. D., eds., Texts and transmission: a survey of the Latin classics, Oxford: 316–22. Reprinted in Whitton and Gibson 2016: 482–8.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (1995) ‘Pliny on Cicero and oratory: self-fashioning in the public eye’, Arethusa 123–35.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (1998) ‘Self and community in the Younger Pliny’, Arethusa 31: 75–97.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. (2018) ‘I will survive (you): Martial and Tacitus on regime change’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 63–85.Google Scholar
Rivoltella, M. (2014) ‘Ritratto di gentiluomo in posa da cacciatore. Su caccia e rusticatio nell’epistolario pliniano’, in Devillers, O., ed., Neronia IX: la villégiature dans le monde romain de Tibère à Hadrien, Bordeaux: 99–103.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. (1989) The jeweled style: poetry and poetics in late antiquity, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. (1992) ‘Classical theories of translation from Cicero to Aulus Gellius’, TextconText 7.1: 15–55.Google Scholar
Roca Barea, E. (1992) ‘La influencia de Quintiliano en los criterios retóricos de Plinio el Joven’, Helmantica 43: 121–9.Google Scholar
Roca Barea, E. (1998) ‘La influencia de Cicerón y Quintiliano en las ideas sobre el estilo en las cartas de Plinio el Joven’, in Albaladejo, del Rio and Caballero 1998: iii, 1053–8.Google Scholar
Rocchi, S. (2015) ‘Plinius’ Brief 8,18: Eine Überschwemmung des Tiber und des Aniene – Text, Textkritik und Intertextualität’, Gymnasium 122: 389–402.Google Scholar
Roche, P. A. (2009) ‘The ivy and the conquering bay: Quintilian on Domitian and Domitianic policy’, in Dominik, Garthwaite and Roche 2009: 367–86.Google Scholar
Roche, P. A., ed. (2011) Pliny’s praise: the Panegyricus in the Roman world, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roche, P. A., (2016) ‘Author and authority in the prefaces of Pliny and Quintilian’, in Zissos, A., ed., A companion to the Flavian age of Rome, Malden, MA: 434–59.Google Scholar
Roche, P. A., (2018) ‘Pliny and Suetonius on giving and returning imperial power’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 146–59.Google Scholar
Rolland, E. (1906) De l’influence de Sénèque le Père et des rheteurs sur Sénèque le Philosophe, Ghent.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (1998) ‘Pliny’s Catullus: the politics of literary appropriation’, TAPA 128: 265–304. Reprinted in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 246–88.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2018) Models from the past in Roman culture: a world of exempla, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (1999) ‘Form in motion: weaving the text in the Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A. and Hinds, S., eds., Ovidian transformations: essays on the Metamorphoses and its reception. PCPS Supplement 23, Cambridge: 240–53. Reprinted in Knox, P. E., ed., Ovid. Oxford readings in classical studies, Oxford: 334–50.Google Scholar
Roth, U. (2016) ‘Liberating the Cena’, CQ 66: 614–34.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1979) ‘De imitatione’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 1–16.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1981) Criticism in antiquity, London.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1990) An anthology of Latin prose, Oxford.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1998) ‘Panegyrists and their teachers’, in Whitby, M., ed., The propaganda of power: the role of panegyric in late antiquity, Leiden: 17–50.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (2001) Quintilian. The orator’s education, 5 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (2003) ‘Omisso speciosiore stili genere’, in Reinhardt, Lapidge and Adams 2005: 257–71.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (1998) Canons of style in the Antonine age: idea-theory in its literary context, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. (2001) Imperial inquisitions: prosecutors and informants from Tiberius to Domitian, London.Google Scholar
Salomies, O. H. (1982) ‘Quintilian and Vitorius Marcellus’, Arctos 16: 153–8.Google Scholar
Sandys, J. E. (1885) M. Tulli Ciceronis Ad M. Brutum Orator, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Santorelli, B. (2014) ‘Aktualisierung’, in Håkanson 2014: 131–5.Google Scholar
Scarano Ussani, V. (2001) ‘Romanus sapiens e civilis vir. L’oratore al servizio del potere nella teoria di Quintiliano’, Ostraka 10: 147–56.Google Scholar
Scarano Ussani, V. (2003) ‘Romanus sapiens and civilis vir: Quintilian’s theory of the orator acting for the benefit of the imperial power’, in Tellegen-Couperus 2003: 287–302.Google Scholar
Scarano Ussani, V. (2008) Il retore e il potere. Progetto formativo e strategie del consenso nell’Institutio oratoria, Naples.Google Scholar
Scarcia, R. (1967) Plinio il Giovane. Lettere scelte, Rome.Google Scholar
Schanz, M. and Hosius, C. (1935) Geschichte der römischen Litteratur bis zum Gesetzgebungswerk des Kaisers Justinian. Zweiter Teil: Die römische Litteratur in der Zeit der Monarchie bis auf Hadrian, 4th edn, Munich.Google Scholar
Schefferus, I. (Scheffer, J.) (1675) ‘In C. Plinium Caecilium Secundum notae’, in Schefferus, I., Lectionum academicarum liber, Hamburg: 59–109.Google Scholar
Scheidegger-Lämmle, C. (2015) ‘Einige Pendenzen: Weben und Text in der antiken Literatur’, in Harich-Schwarzbauer, H., ed., Weben und Gewebe in der Antike: Materialität – Repräsentation – Episteme, Oxford: 167–208.Google Scholar
Schenk, P. (1999) ‘Formen von Intertextualität im Briefkorpus des jüngeren Plinius’, Philologus 143: 114–34.Google Scholar
Schlegel, C. (2000) ‘Horace and his fathers: Satires 1.4 and 1.6’, AJP 121: 93–119.Google Scholar
Schlegel, C. (2005) Satire and the threat of speech: Horace’s Satires, book 1, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Schuster, M. (1958) C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri novem. Epistularum ad Traianum liber. Panegyricus, 3rd edn (revised by Hanslik, R.), Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schwabe, L. (1909) ‘Fabius, 137. M. Fabius Quintilianus, der Rhetor’, RE i.6: 1845–64.Google Scholar
Schwarz, C. G. (1746) C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi Panegyricus, Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Schwerdtner, K. (2015) Plinius und seine Klassiker: Studien zur literarischen Zitation in den Pliniusbriefen, Berlin.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1990) Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts, New Haven.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (1987) ‘The tragic wedding’, JHS 107: 106–30.Google Scholar
Seel, O. (1977) Quintilian, oder: Die Kunst des Redens und Schweigens, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Seelentag, G. (2004) Taten und Tugenden Traians. Herrschaftsdarstellung im Principat, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Seelentag, G. (2011) ‘Imperial representation and reciprocation: the case of Trajan’, CJ 107: 73–97.Google Scholar
Sehlmeyer, F. 1912. Beziehungen zwischen Quintilians Institutiones oratoriae und Ciceros rhetorischen Schriften, Münster.Google Scholar
Seo, J. M. (2013) Exemplary traits: reading characterization in Roman poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. (1976) ‘On the date of publication of Cicero’s letters to Atticus’, SO 51: 105–20.Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. (1988) Seneca e i greci: citazioni e traduzioni nelle opere filosofiche, Bologna.Google Scholar
Seyffert, M. (1861) ‘Zu Quintil. Inst. orat.’, Zeitschrift für das Gymnasialwesen 15: 295–8.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1965–70) Cicero’s letters to Atticus, 7 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shelton, J.-A. (2013) The women of Pliny’s letters, Abingdon.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1959) Review of Syme 1958, JRS 49: 140–6.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966) The letters of Pliny. A historical and social commentary, Oxford (with corrected reprint, 1985).Google Scholar
Shuger, D. K. (1984) ‘The grand style and the genera dicendi in ancient rhetoric’, Traditio 40: 1–42.Google Scholar
Shuger, D. K. (1988) Sacred rhetoric: the Christian grand style in the English Renaissance, Princeton.Google Scholar
Silk, M., Gildenhard, I. and Barrow, R. (2014) The classical tradition: art, literature, thought, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Sinclair, B. W. (1980) ‘Valerius Maximus and the evolution of silver Latin’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cincinatti.Google Scholar
Sinclair, P. (1995) Tacitus the sententious historian. A sociology of rhetoric in Annales 1–6, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1985) The Annals of Quintus Ennius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Small, J. P. (1997) Wax tablets of the mind: cognitive studies of memory and literacy in classical antiquity, London.Google Scholar
Smiraglia, P. (1955) ‘Il Dialogus de oratoribus. Cronologia e rapporti con l’insegnamento di Quintiliano’, AFLN 5: 159–89.Google Scholar
Spalding, G. L. (1798–1816) M. Fabius Quintilianus. De institutione oratoria, 4 vols. (vol. 4 completed by Buttmann, P. K. from Inst. 12.3.7), Leipzig. Further volumes by Zumpt, K. G. (vol. 5, Supplementa annotationis et index, 1829) and Bonnell, E. (vol. 6, Lexicon Quintilianeum, 1834).Google Scholar
Spina, L. (2001) L’oratore scriteriato: per una storia letteraria e politica di Tersite, Naples.Google Scholar
Spina, L. (2010) ‘Umbratici doctores e studia in umbra educata: metafore per una querelle’, in Petrone, G. and Casamento, A., eds., Studia … in umbra educata. Percorsi della retorica latina in età imperiale, Palermo: 7–15.Google Scholar
Squire, M. J. (2009) Image and text in Graeco-Roman antiquity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Squire, M. J. (2012) The Iliad in a nutshell: visualizing epic on the Tabulae Iliacae, Oxford.Google Scholar
Squire, M. J. (2014) ‘The ordo of rhetoric and the rhetoric of order’, in Elsner and Meyer 2014: 353–417.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. E. (2006) ‘Pliny and the ideology of empire: the correspondence with Trajan’, Prometheus 32: 61–76.Google Scholar
Starr, R. J. (1981) ‘Cross-references in Roman prose’, AJP 102: 431–7.Google Scholar
Stephanus, H. (Étienne, H.) (1591) C. Plin. Secundi Epist. libri IX … Adiunctae sunt Isaaci Casauboni notae etc., 2nd edn, Geneva.Google Scholar
Stevens, B. (2009) ‘Pliny and the dolphin – or a story about storytelling’, Arethusa 42: 161–79.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. J. (2004) ‘Gellius and the Roman antiquarian tradition’, in Holford-Strevens and Vardi 2004: 118–55.Google Scholar
Storey, I. C. (2003) Eupolis: poet of Old Comedy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1975) Taxis und Taktik: Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (2004) ‘Tacitus schreibt eine unpolitische Geisterstory des Plinius in eine Aufsteigergeschichte um: Aufstieg und Fall des Curtius Rufus bei Plin. epist. 7,27,2f. und bei Tac. ann. 11,20f.’, in Ad fontes! Festschrift für Gerhard Dobesch zum 65. Geburtstag, Vienna: 493–504.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (2016) ‘Ein anerkannt schlechtes Gedicht des jüngeren Plinius (epist. 7.4.6 = Plin. fr. 1 Bl.2)’, in Pieri, B. and Pellacani, D., eds., Si verba tenerem. Studi sulla poesia latina in frammenti, Berlin: 159–84.Google Scholar
Summers, W. C. (1910) Select letters of Seneca, London.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1939) ‘Observations on the province of Cilicia’, in Calder, W. M. and Keil, J., eds., Anatolian studies presented to William Hepburn Buckler, Manchester: 299–332.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1958) Tacitus, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1979a) ‘Juvenal, Pliny, Tacitus’, AJP 100: 250–78. Reprinted in Syme, R., Roman papers iii (ed. Birley, A. R., Oxford, 1984): 1135–57.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1979b) ‘Ummidius Quadratus, capax imperii’, HSCP 82: 287–310. Reprinted in Syme, R., Roman papers iii (ed. Birley, A. R., Oxford, 1984): 1158–78.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1985a) ‘Correspondents of Pliny’, Historia 34: 324–59. Reprinted in R. Syme, Roman papers v (ed. A. R. Birley, Oxford, 1988): 440–77.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1985b) ‘The dating of Pliny’s last letters’, CQ 35: 176–85. Reprinted in Syme, R., Roman papers v (ed. Birley, A. R., Oxford, 1988): 478–89.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1991) Roman papers vii (ed. Birley, A. R.), Oxford.Google Scholar
Tagliabue, A. (2016) ‘Heliodorus’ reading of Lucian’s Toxaris’, Mnemosyne 69: 397–419.Google Scholar
Taisne, A.-M. (2006) ‘Avatars du Dialogue des orateurs de Tacite dans les Silves de Stace et les Epîtres de Pline’, in Laurence, P. and Guillaumont, L., eds., Epistulae antiquae iv, Leuven: 161–9.Google Scholar
Talbert, R. J. A. (1984) The senate of imperial Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar
Tamás, A. (2015) ‘Tagesordnung. Dispositio der Alltagspraktiken bei Plinius dem Jüngeren’, in Haß and Noller 2015: 51–70.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (2006) ‘Seeing Seneca whole?’, in Volk, K. and Williams, G. D., eds., Seeing Seneca whole: perspectives on philosophy, poetry and politics, Leiden: 1–17.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. W. Jr. (1970) ‘An introduction and commentary to Book 3 of Quintilian’s Institutio oratoria’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Tellegen-Couperus, O. E., ed. (2003) Quintilian and the law: the art of persuasion in law and politics, Leuven.Google Scholar
Telò, M. (2007) Eupolidis Demi, Florence.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. (2017) ‘Oratorical performance in Pliny’s Letters’, in Papaioannou, S., Serafim, A. and da Vela, B., eds., The theatre of justice: aspects of performance in Greco-Roman oratory and rhetoric, Leiden: 175–97.Google Scholar
Terrill, R. E. (2016) ‘Reproducing virtue: Quintilian, imitation, and rhetorical education’, Advances in the History of Rhetoric 19: 157–71.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. (1885) Review of Birt, T., Das antike Buchwesen in seinem Verhältniss zur Litteratur (1882), Revue critique d’histoire et de littérature 20: 87–93.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1982) ‘Catullus and the polemics of poetic reference (poem 64.1–18)’, AJP 103: 144–64.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1986) ‘Virgil’s Georgics and the art of reference’, HSCP 90: 171–98.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1988) Virgil. Georgics, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1992) ‘The old man revisited: memory, reference, and genre in Virg., Georg. 4, 116–48’, MD 29: 35–70.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1999) Reading Virgil and his texts: studies in intertextuality, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2009) ‘The Germania as literary text’, in Woodman 2009c: 59–72.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2011) Horace. Odes book 4 and Carmen saeculare, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tischer, U. (2017) ‘Nostra faciamus. Quoting in Horace and Seneca’, in Stöckinger, M., Winter, K. and Zanker, A. T., eds., Horace and Seneca: interactions, intertexts, interpretations, Berlin: 289–313.Google Scholar
Tischer, U. and Binternagel, A., eds. (2010) Fremde Rede – Eigene Rede: Zitieren und verwandte Strategien in antiker Prosa, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Toohey, P. (1993) Review of Farrell 1991, Electronic Antiquity 1.2.Google Scholar
Tosi, R. (2017) Dizionario delle sentenze latine e greche, rev. edn, Milan.Google Scholar
Townend, G. B. (1960) ‘The sources of the Greek in Suetonius’, Hermes 88: 98–120.Google Scholar
Traina, A. (1974) Lo stile ‘drammatico’ del filosofo Seneca, Bologna.Google Scholar
Traina, A. (1989) ‘Le traduzioni’, in Cavallo, Fedeli and Giardina 1989: ii, 93–123.Google Scholar
Traub, H. W. (1955) ‘Pliny’s treatment of history in epistolary form’, TAPA 86: 213–32. Reprinted in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 123–45.Google Scholar
Trinacty, C. (2009) ‘Like father, like son? Selected examples of intertextuality in Seneca the Elder and Seneca the Younger’, Phoenix 63: 260–77.Google Scholar
Trisoglio, F. (1973) Opere di Plinio Cecilio Secondo, 2 vols., Turin.Google Scholar
Tzounakas, S. (2013) ‘Martial’s Pliny as quoted by Pliny’, C&M 64: 247–68.Google Scholar
Tzounakas, S. (2015) ‘Pliny as the Roman Demosthenes’, in Devillers 2015: 207–18.Google Scholar
Tzounakas, S. (2017) ‘Self-presentation in Pliny’s Epistle 9.23’, in Gavrielatos, A., ed., Self-presentation and identity in the Roman world, Newcastle: 82–92.Google Scholar
Uden, J. (2015) The invisible satirist: Juvenal and second-century Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Uden, J. (2018) ‘Childhood education and the boundaries of interaction: [Plutarch], Quintilian, Juvenal’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 385–401.Google Scholar
Ueding, G., ed. (1994) Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. Band 2, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Urban, D. C. (2011) ‘The use of exempla from Cicero to Pliny the Younger’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Ussani, V. (1970) ‘Leggendo Plinio il Giovane, I. Historia – nomen inertiae’, RCCM 12: 271–348.Google Scholar
Ussani, V. (1971) ‘Leggendo Plinio il Giovane, II. Oratio – historia’, RCCM 13: 70–135.Google Scholar
van den Berg, C. (2014) The world of Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus: aesthetics and empire in ancient Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar
van den Hout, M. P. J. (1999) A commentary on the letters of M. Cornelius Fronto, Leiden.Google Scholar
Vardi, A. D. (2000) ‘Brevity, conciseness, and compression in Roman poetic criticism and the text of Gellius’ Noctes Atticae 19.9.10’, AJP 121: 291–8.Google Scholar
Vardi, A. D. (2002) ‘A book of verse beneath a bough: literature for recreation in the early principate’, SCI 21: 83–96.Google Scholar
Vardi, A. D. (2004) ‘Genre, conventions, and cultural programme in Gellius’ Noctes Atticae’, in Holford-Strevens and Vardi 2004: 159–86.Google Scholar
Vaubel, E. (1969) Pudor, verecundia, reverentia. Untersuchungen zur Psychologie von Scham und Ehrfurcht bei den Römern bis Augustin, Münster.Google Scholar
Venini, P. (1952) ‘Le parole greche nell’epistolario di Plinio’, Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo. Classe di lettere e scienze morali e storiche 85: 259–69.Google Scholar
Viano, C. (1995) ‘Quintiliano e la storia della filosofia: l’uso delle quaestiones philosopho convenientes’, Rhetorica 13: 193–207.Google Scholar
Vidman, L. (1982) Fasti Ostienses, 2nd edn, Prague.Google Scholar
Villaseñor Cuspinera, V. (2006) ‘La expresión del dolor: un sentimiento prescrito (Quint., Inst. or., VI. pr., Stat., Silv., V.V.)’, Nova Tellus 24: 93–121.Google Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. (2003) ‘Die Selbstinszenierung des jüngeren Plinius im Diskurs der literarischen imitatio’, in Castagna and Lefèvre 2003: 51–65.Google Scholar
Voss, B.-R. (1963) Der pointierte Stil des Tacitus, Münster.Google Scholar
Vretska, H. and Vretska, K. (1979) Marcus Tullius Cicero, Pro Archia poeta: Ein Zeugnis für den Kampf des Geistes um seine Anerkennung, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Walker, B. (1969) Review of Cova 1966, CP 64: 51–3.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (2006) Pliny the Younger. Complete letters, Oxford.Google Scholar
Walzer, A. (2003) ‘Quintilian’s vir bonus and the Stoic wise man’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly 31: 25–41.Google Scholar
Walzer, A. (2006) ‘Moral philosophy and rhetoric in the Institutes: Quintilian on honor and expediency’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly 36: 263–81.Google Scholar
Watt, W. S. (1998) ‘Notes on Quintilian’, ZPE 121: 68–71.Google Scholar
Wecowski, M. (2016) ‘Herodotus in Thucydides: a hypothesis’, in Priestley, J. and Zali, V., eds., Brill’s companion to the reception of Herodotus in antiquity and beyond, Leiden: 17–33.Google Scholar
Weische, A. (1989) ‘Plinius d. J. und Cicero. Untersuchungen zur römischen Epistolographie in Republik und Kaiserzeit’, ANRW ii.33.1: 375–86.Google Scholar
Welch, T. (2013) ‘Was Valerius Maximus a hack?’, AJP 134: 67–82.Google Scholar
West, D. (1979) ‘Two plagues: Virgil, Georgics 3.478–566 and Lucretius 6.1090–1286’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 71–88.Google Scholar
West, D. and Woodman, T. [A. J.] (1979a) ‘Epilogue’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 195–200.Google Scholar
West, D. and Woodman, T. [A. J.], eds. (1979b) Creative imitation in Latin literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
White, P. (1975) ‘The friends of Martial, Statius, and Pliny, and the dispersal of patronage’, HSCP 79: 265–300.Google Scholar
White, P. (2009) ‘Bookshops in the literary culture of Rome’, in Johnson and Parker 2009: 268–87.Google Scholar
White, P. (2010) Cicero in letters: epistolary relations of the late republic, Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. J. G. (2007) ‘“This in-between book”: language, politics and genre in the Agricola’, in McGing, B. and Mossman, J. M., eds., The limits of biography, Swansea: 305–33.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. J. G. (2013) Beyond the Second Sophistic: adventures in Greek postclassicism, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2010) ‘Pliny, Epistles 8.14: senate, slavery and the Agricola’, JRS 100: 118–39.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2011a) ‘Dubitatio comparativa: a misunderstood idiom in Pliny (Natural history 7.150), Tacitus (Histories 4.6) and others’, CQ 61: 267–77.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2011b) Review of Lefèvre 2009, CR 61: 147–9.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2012) ‘“Let us tread our path together”: Tacitus and the Younger Pliny’, in Pagán, V. E., ed., A companion to Tacitus, Malden, MA: 345–68.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2013a) Pliny the Younger. Epistles book 2, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2013b) ‘Trapdoors: the falsity of closure in Pliny’s Epistles’, in Grewing, F. and Acosta-Hughes, B., eds., The door ajar: false closure in Greek and Roman literature and art, Heidelberg: 43–61.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2014) ‘Minerva on the Surrey Downs: reading Pliny (and Horace) with John Toland’, CCJ 60: 127–57.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2015a) ‘Grand designs: unrolling Epistles 2’, in Marchesi 2015b: 109–43.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2015b) ‘Pliny on the precipice (Ep., 9.26)’, in Devillers 2015: 217–36.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2015c) ‘Pliny’s progress: on a troublesome Domitianic career’, Chiron 45: 1–22.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2018a) ‘Quintilian, Pliny, Tacitus’, in König and Whitton 2018b: 37–62.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2018b) ‘Alius aliud: context, commentary and Pliny (Epistles 9,3)’, in Tischer, U., Forst, A. and Gärtner, U., eds., Text, Kontext, Kontextualisierung: Moderne Kontextkonzepte und antike Literatur, Hildesheim: 137–60.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. and Gibson, R. K. (2016) ‘Readers and readings of Pliny’s Epistles’, in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 1–48.Google Scholar
von Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, U. (1900) ‘Asianismus und Attizismus’, Hermes 35: 1–52. Reprinted in Kleine Schriften 3, Berlin, 1969: 223–73.Google Scholar
Wille, G. (1967) Musica Romana: Die Bedeutung der Musik im Leben der Römer, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Williams, Gareth D. (2003) Seneca. De brevitate vitae and De otio, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Williams, Gordon (1968) Tradition and originality in Roman poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Williams, Gordon (1983) ‘Roman poets as literary historians: some aspects of imitatio’, ICS 8: 211–37.Google Scholar
Wills, J. (1996) Repetition in Latin poetry: figures of allusion, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wills, J. (1998) ‘Divided allusion: Virgil and the coma Berenices’, HSCP 98: 277–305.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. L. (1898) ‘The literary influence of Martial upon Juvenal’, AJP 19: 193–209.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (2004) ‘Ovidian Silius’, Arethusa 37: 225–49.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. 1964. ‘Quintilian and the vir bonus’, JRS 54: 90–7.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1968) Review of Cova 1966, JRS 58: 303.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1970a) M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae libri duodecim, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1970b) Problems in Quintilian, London.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1974) The Elder Seneca, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1975) ‘Quintilian and rhetoric’, in Dorey, T. A., ed., Empire and aftermath. Silver Latin II, London: 79–97.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1979) Review of Picone 1978, CR 29: 67–8.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1981) ‘Cicero and the Silver Age’, in Ludwig, W., ed., Éloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron, Vandoeuvres: 237–74.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1983) ‘Quintilian and declamation’, in Hommages à Jean Cousin. Rencontres avec l’antiquité classique, Paris: 225–36.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1984) The Minor declamations ascribed to Quintilian, Berlin.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1989) ‘Cicero and the middle style’, in Diggle, J., Hall, J. B. and Jocelyn, H. D., eds., Studies in Latin literature and its tradition in honour of C. O. Brink. PCPS Supplement 15, Cambridge: 125–31.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1995) ‘On impulse’, in Innes, D., Hines, H. and Pelling, C., eds., Ethics and rhetoric: classical essays for Donald Russell on his seventy-fifth birthday, Oxford: 313–22.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1998) ‘Quintilian the moralist’, in Albaladejo, del Rio and Caballero 1998: i, 317–34.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (2005) ‘Approaching the end: Quintilian 12.11’, AC 48: 175–83.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (2006) ‘Declamation and philosophy’, Classica (Brazil) 19: 74–82.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (2009) Review of Scarano Ussani 2008, CR 59: 634.Google Scholar
Wisse, J., Winterbottom, M. and Fantham, E. (2008) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore libri III. Volume V: Commentary on book III, 96–230, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Wolff, É. (2003) Pline le Jeune ou le refus de péssimisme, Rennes.Google Scholar
Wolff, É. (2004) ‘Pline et Cicéron: quelques remarques’, in Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E., eds., Epistulae antiquae iii, Leuven: 441–7.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1975) ‘Questions of date, genre, and style in Velleius: some literary answers’, CQ: 272–306. Modified reprint in Woodman 2012: 201–22.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1988) Rhetoric and classical historiography: four studies, London.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1997) ‘Tacitus’, in Kraus, C. S. and Woodman, A. J., Latin historians, Oxford: 88–118.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1998) Tacitus reviewed, Oxford.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2006) ‘Mutiny and madness: Tacitus Annals 1.16–49’, Arethusa 39: 303–29. Reprinted in Woodman 2012: 296–321.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2009a) ‘Introduction’, in Woodman 2009c: 1–14.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2009b) ‘Tacitus and the contemporary scene’, in Woodman 2009c: 31–43. Reprinted in Woodman 2012: 243–56.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J., ed. (2009c) The Cambridge companion to Tacitus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J., (2012) From poetry to history: selected papers, Oxford.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J., (2014) Tacitus. Agricola. With C. S. Kraus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J., (2015) ‘Tacitus and Germanicus: monuments and models’, in Ash, R., Mossman, J. and Titchener, F. B., eds., Fame and infamy: essays on characterization in Greek and Roman biography and historiography, Oxford: 255–68.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J., (2018) The Annals of Tacitus. Book 4, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J., and Martin, R. H. (1996) The Annals of Tacitus. Book 3, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woodman, T. [A. J.] (1979) ‘Self-imitation and the substance of history: Tacitus, Annals 1.61–5 and Histories 2.70, 5.14–15’, in West and Woodman 1979b: 143–55. Reprinted in Woodman 1998: 70–85.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. D. (2003) ‘The city of letters’, in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G., eds., Rome the cosmopolis, Cambridge: 203–21.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. D. (2015) ‘Pliny/Trajan and the poetics of empire’, CP 110: 132–51.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W. (1997) ‘Cicero and Quintilian on the style of Demosthenes’, Rhetorica 15: 177–92.Google Scholar
Worman, N. (2015) Landscape and the spaces of metaphor in ancient literary theory and criticism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woytek, E. (2006) ‘Der Panegyricus des Plinius. Sein Verhältnis zum Dialogus und den Historiae des Tacitus und seine absolute Datierung’, WS 119: 115–56.Google Scholar
Yardley, J. C. (2003) Justin and Pompeius Trogus: a study of the language of Justin’s Epitome of Trogus, Toronto.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1966) The art of memory, Chicago.Google Scholar
Young-Widmaier, M. R. (2002) ‘Quintilian’s legal representation of Julia Berenice’, Historia 51: 124–9.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. V. (2012) ‘Mimesis and the (plu)past in Plutarch’s Lives’, in Grethlein, J. and Krebs, C. B., eds., Time and narrative in ancient historiography: the ‘plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian, Cambridge: 175–98.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. and Ewald, B. C. (2012) Living with myths: the imagery of Roman sarcophagi (transl. Slater, J.), Oxford (orig. Mit Mythen leben: Die Bilderwelt der römischen Sarkophage, Munich, 2004).Google Scholar
Zehnacker, H. (2003) ‘Les lettres de Pline le Jeune, ou l’idéalisation du quotidien’, Vita Latina 168: 47–56.Google Scholar
Zehnacker, H. (2009–17) Pline le Jeune. Lettres, 4 vols. (French translation by N. Méthy from vol. 2), Paris.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. (1983) ‘Catullus, Ennius, and the poetics of allusion’, ICS 8: 251–66.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. (1995) Cicero. De re publica: selections, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zinsmaier, T. (2003) ‘Quintilian als Deklamator. Die Topik des parens superstes im Proömium zu Buch VI der Institutio oratoria’, in Schröder, B.-J. and Schröder, J.-P., eds., Studium declamatorium: Untersuchungen zu Schulübungen und Prunkreden von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit, Munich: 153–68.Google Scholar
Zucchelli, B. (1974) ‘Il destino e la provvidenza in Quintiliano’, Paideia 29: 3–17.Google Scholar
Zucchelli, B. (1987) ‘Sulla data di pubblicazione dell’Institutio oratoria di Quintiliano’, in Boldrini, S., ed., Filologia e forme letterarie: studi offerti a Francesco della Corte, Urbino: iv, 47–60.Google Scholar
Zucker, F. (1929) ‘Plinius epist. VIII 24 – ein Denkmal antiker Humanität’, Philologus 84: 209–32.Google Scholar
Zundel, E. (1981) Lehrstil und rhetorischer Stil in Quintilians Institutio oratoria: Untersuchungen zur Form eines Lehrbuchs, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Zundel, E. (1989) Clavis Quintilianea: Quintilians ‘Institutio oratoria’ aufgeschlüsselt nach rhetorischen Begriffen, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. (1997) ‘Die chronische Unpäßlichkeit des Messalla Corvinus’, Hermes 125: 85–91.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×