Book contents
- Aristotle’s On the Soul
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Aristotle’s On the Soul
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Hylomorphic Explanation and the Scientific Status of the De Anima
- Chapter 2 Aristotle on Earlier Definitions of Soul and Their Explanatory Power: DA I.2–5
- Chapter 3 Why Nous Cannot Be a Magnitude: De Anima I.3
- Chapter 4 Souls among Forms: Harmonies and Aristotle’s Hylomorphism
- Chapter 5 Aristotle on the Soul’s Unity
- Chapter 6 Aristotle on Seed
- Chapter 7 The Gate to Reality
- Chapter 8 Aristotle on the Objects of Perception
- Chapter 9 Perceptual Attention and Reflective Awareness in the Aristotelian Tradition
- Chapter 10 Phantasia and Error
- Chapter 11 Intelligibility, Insight, and Intelligence
- Chapter 12 The Separability of Nous
- Chapter 13 Thought and Imagination
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2022
Edited by
Book contents
- Aristotle’s On the Soul
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Aristotle’s On the Soul
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Hylomorphic Explanation and the Scientific Status of the De Anima
- Chapter 2 Aristotle on Earlier Definitions of Soul and Their Explanatory Power: DA I.2–5
- Chapter 3 Why Nous Cannot Be a Magnitude: De Anima I.3
- Chapter 4 Souls among Forms: Harmonies and Aristotle’s Hylomorphism
- Chapter 5 Aristotle on the Soul’s Unity
- Chapter 6 Aristotle on Seed
- Chapter 7 The Gate to Reality
- Chapter 8 Aristotle on the Objects of Perception
- Chapter 9 Perceptual Attention and Reflective Awareness in the Aristotelian Tradition
- Chapter 10 Phantasia and Error
- Chapter 11 Intelligibility, Insight, and Intelligence
- Chapter 12 The Separability of Nous
- Chapter 13 Thought and Imagination
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Aristotle's On the SoulA Critical Guide, pp. 265 - 278Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Ackrill, J. L. 1972. “Aristotle’s Definitions of psuchē.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73: 119–133. Reprinted in Barnes, Schofield, and Sorabji 1979, 65–75.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Maria. 2013. “Agency and Two‐Way Powers.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113: 101–121.Google Scholar
Angioni, L. 2001. “Explanation and Definition in Physics I 1.” Apeiron 34: 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1984. “Sentencia Libri De Anima.” In Gauthier, A. R. (ed.),Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia, vol. 45. Rome: Commissio Leonina, 1–313.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M. 1992. Aristotle. De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with passages from II. 1–3) With a Report on Recent Work and an Additional Bibliography by A. Gotthelf, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. 2000. Theophrastus against the Preoscratics and Plato: Peripatetic Dialectic in the De Sensibus. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastit, M. 1996. “Qu’est-ce qu’une Partie de l’Âme pour Aristote?.” In Viano, Christina, (ed.), Corps et âme – sur le De anima d’Aristote, Paris: Vrin, 13–36.Google Scholar
Beare, John I. 1906. Greek Theories of Elementary Cognition from Alcmaeon to Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beere, J. 2009. Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bergeron, Martin and Richard, Dufour. (eds.), 2008. Alexandre d’Aphrodise: De l’âme. Texte grec introduit, traduit et annoté. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Bernard, Wolfgang. 1987. “Philoponus on Self-Awareness.” In Sorabji, R. (ed.), Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science. London: Duckworth, 195–206.Google Scholar
Berti, Enrico. 1978. “The Intellection of ‘Indivisibles’ according to Aristotle, De anima III 6.” In Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L (eds.), Aristotle on Mind and the Senses, Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–163.Google Scholar
Berti, Enrico 1994. “Encore sur l’intellection des ‘indivisibles’ selon Aristote, De anima III 6.” In Alberti, A. (ed.), Realtà e ragione. Studi di filosofia antica. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 123–136.Google Scholar
Berti, Enrico 1996. “Does Aristotle’s Conception of Dialectic Develop?.” In Wians, William Robert (ed.), Aristotle’s Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects, Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 105–130.Google Scholar
Betegh, Gábor. 2020. “Thinking with Empedocles: Aristotle on Soul as Harmonia.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 59.Google Scholar
Blair, G. A. 1992. Energeia and Entelecheia: “Act” in Aristotle. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Block, Irving. 1960. “Aristotle and the Physical Object.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21(1): 93–101.Google Scholar
Block, Irving 1961. “Truth and Error in Aristotle’s Theory of Sense Perception.” The Philosophical Quarterly 11(42): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. 2000. “Simplicius”: On Aristotle On the Soul 3.1–5. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bolton, Robert. 1978. “Aristotle’s Definitions of the Soul: De Anima II, 1–3.” Phronesis 23(3):258–278.Google Scholar
Bolton, Robert 1987. “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals.” In Gotthelf, A., and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,120–166.Google Scholar
Bonitz, Hermann. 1955. Index Aristotelicus. Zweite Auflage. Graz: Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Boyle, Matthew. 2012. “Essentially Rational Animals.” In Abel, Günter and Conant, James (eds.), Rethinking Epistemology, vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter, 395–428.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. 1977. The Psychology of Aristotle, edited and translated by George, Rolf. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles. 2003. “Attention Deficit in Plotinus and Augustine: Psychological Problems in Christian and Platonist Theories of the Grades of Virtue.” Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 18: 223–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broackes, Justin. 1999. “Aristotle, Objectivity and Perception.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 57–114.Google Scholar
Broadie, Sarah. 1993. “Aristotle’s Perceptual Realism.” Ancient Minds (Southern Journal of Philosophy 31, suppl.): 137–159.Google Scholar
Bronstein, David. 2016. Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques. 1991. “Les multiples chemins aristotéliciens de la sensation commune.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 96: 455–74.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques 1996. “En quel sens le sens commun est-il commun?.” In Viano, C. (ed.), Corps et âme. Sur le De Anima d’Aristote, Paris: Vrin, 189–218.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles. 1992. “How Much Happens When Aristotle Sees Red and Hears Middle C? Remarks on De Anima 2. 7–8.” In Nussbaum and Rorty 1995: 421–434.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles 2008. Aristotle’s Divine Intellect. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, J. 2018. “Does the Soul Weave? Reconsidering De Anima 1.4, 408a29–b18.” Phronesis 63: 25–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. 2019. Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology: The Science of Soul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cashdollar, Stanford. 1973. “Aristotle’s Account of Incidental Perception.” Phronesis 18: 156–175.Google Scholar
Castelli, L. 2018. Aristotle: Metaphysics Book Iota: Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Caston, Victor 1997. “Epiphenomenalisms, Ancient and Modern.” Philosophical Review 106(3): 309–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, Victor 1998. “Aristotle and the Problem of Intentionality.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 249–298.Google Scholar
Caston, Victor 1999. “Aristotle’s Two Intellects: A Modest Proposal.” Phronesis 44: 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, Victor 2000. “Aristotle’s Argument for Why the Understanding Is Not Compounded with the Body.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 16: 135–174.Google Scholar
Caston, Victor 2005. “The Spirit and the Letter: Aristotle on Perception.” In Salles, Ricardo (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 245–320.Google Scholar
Caston, Victor 2012a. “Higher-Order Awareness in Alexander of Aphrodisias.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 55: 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, Victor 2012b. Alexander of Aphrodisias: On the Soul. Part I: Soul as Form of the Body, Parts of the Soul, Nourishment, and Perception. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Caston, Victor 2018. “Aristotle on the Reality of Colours and Other Perceptible Qualities.” Res Philosophica 95(1): 35–68.Google Scholar
Caston, Victor 2020. “Aristotle on the Transmission of Information: Receiving Form without the Matter.” In Bennet, D. and Tovanen, J. (eds.), Philosophical Problems in Sense Perception: Testing the Limits of Aristotelianism, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 15–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
unpublished. “Aristotle on Common Perceptibles.”Google Scholar
Charles, David. 1984. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Action. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Charlton, W. 1987. “Aristotle on the Place of the Mind in Nature.” In Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James J. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 408–423.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1935. Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Cameron F. and Lennox, James G. 2020. “Aristotle on the Unity of the Nutritive and Reproductive Functions.” Phronesis 65(4): 414–466.Google Scholar
Cohoe, Caleb M. 2013. “Why the Intellect Cannot Have a Bodily Organ: De Anima 3.4.” Phronesis 58(4): 347–377.Google Scholar
Cohoe, Caleb 2016. “When and Why Understanding Needs Phantasmata: A Moderate Interpretation of Aristotle’s De Memoria and De Anima on the Role of Images in Intellectual Activities.” Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 61(3): 337–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohoe, Caleb 2020. “Living without a Soul: Why God and the Heavenly Movers Fall Outside of Aristotle’s Psychology.” Phronesis 65(3): 281–323.Google Scholar
Connell, Sophia M. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals: A Study of the Generation of Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Kathleen C. 1996. “Sexual Inequality in Aristotle’s Theories of Reproduction and Inheritance.” In Ward, J. (ed.), Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 51–67.Google Scholar
Cooper, John M. 1982. “Aristotle on Natural Teleology.” In Schofield, Malcolm and Nussbaum, Martha Craven, (eds.), Language and Logos, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197–222.Google Scholar
Cooper, John M. and Hutchinson, D. S. (eds.), 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Corcilius, Klaus. 2008. “Two Jobs for the Practical Syllogism?” History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 2: 163–184.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2009. “How are Episodes of Thought Initiated According to Aristotle?” In Riel, G. V. and Destrée, P. (eds.), Ancient Perspective on Aristotle’s De Anima, Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press, 1–17.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2014. “Activity, Passivity and Sensory Discrimination in Aristotle.” In Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M., (eds.), Active Perception Ancient And Modern, New York: Springer, 31–53.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2018. “Ideal Intellectual Cognition in Timaeus 37a2-c5.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 54: 51–106.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. and Gregoric, Pavel. 2010. “Separability vs. Difference: Parts and Capacities of the Soul in Aristotle.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 81–120.Google Scholar
Corcilius, Klaus and Gregoric, Pavel. 2013. “Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motion.” Phronesis 58 (1):52–97.Google Scholar
Corkum, Phil 2010. “Attention, Perception, and Thought in Aristotle.” Dialogue 49: 1–24.Google Scholar
Corkum, Phil 2013. “Substance and Independence in Aristotle.” In Schnieder, B., Steinberg, A. and Hoeltje, M. (eds.), Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Munich, Germany: Philosophia Verlag, 36–67.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl and Tabery, James. 2019. “Mechanisms in Science,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 ed.), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/science-mechanisms/.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain . New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
De Haan, Daniel D. 2017. “Hylomorphism, New Mechanisms, and Explanations in Biology, Neuroscience, and Psychology.” In M. R. Simpson, William, Koons, Robert C., Teh, Nicholas J. (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science, New York: Routledge, 293–326.Google Scholar
De Haas, Frans. 2005. “The Discriminating Capacity of the Soul in Aristotle’s Theory of Learning.” In Salles, R. (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 321–44.Google Scholar
Delcomminette, S. 2020. “De Anima III 6.” In Guyomarc’h, G., Louguet, C., and Murgier, C. (eds.), Aristote et l’ame humaine: Lectures de “De anima” III offertes a Michel Crubellier. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
de Ribera-Martin, Ignacio. 2019. “Seed (Sperma) and Kuēma in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals.” Journal of the History of Biology 52: 87–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Destrée, Pierre. 2007. “Aristotle on the Causes of Akrasia. in Akrasia.” In Bobonich, Christopher and Destrée, Pierre (eds.), Greek Philosophy, Leiden: Brill, 139–166.Google Scholar
Düring, I. 1957. “Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Sweden: Göteborg.” Ancient Philosophy 29: 1–37.Google Scholar
Driscoll, J. 1992. “The Anaxagorean Assumption in Aristotle’s Account of Mind.” In Anton, J. and Preus, A. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy 5, New York: State University of New York Press, 273–92.Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs, J. H. (ed.), 1965. Aristotle, De Generatione Animalium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emilsson, Eyjólfur. 1988. Plotinus on Sense-Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engmann, J. 1976. “Imagination and Truth in Aristotle.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14(3): 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S. 1994. “Integration of the Cognitive and the Psychodynamic Unconscious.” American Psychologist 409: 709–724.Google Scholar
Evans, J. and Frankish, K.. (eds.), 2009. In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Falcon, Andrea. 2009. “The Scope and Unity of Aristotle’s Investigation of the Soul.” In Van Riel, G. and Destrée, P. (eds.), Ancient Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Anima. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press, 167–181.Google Scholar
Fiecconi, Elena. Forthcoming. “Aristotle on attention,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2018-0014/html.Google Scholar
Förster, Aurelius. (ed.), 1912. Aristotelis De anima libri III. Budapest: Acad. litt. Hungary.Google Scholar
Frankish, K. 2010. “Dual-Process and Dual-System Theories of Reasoning.” Philosophy Compass 5: 914–926.Google Scholar
Frede, Dorothea, 1992. “The Cognitive Role of Phantasia in Aristotle.” In Nussbaum and Rorty 1992, 279–95.Google Scholar
Frede, Dorothea 1996. “The Philosophical Economy of Plato’s Psychology: Rationality and Common Concepts in the Timaeus.” In Frede, Michael and Striker, Gisela (eds.), Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, Dorothea 2012. “The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa Are And What They Are Not.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43 (Winter 2012): 185–215.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. 1996. “La theorie aristotelicienne de l’intellect agent.” In Dherbey, Gilbert Romeyer (ed.), Corps et Ame: Sur le De Anima d’Aristote, Paris: Libraire Philosophique J. Vrin, 377–390.Google Scholar
Freeland, Cynthia. 1994. “Aristotle on Perception, Appetition, and Self-Motion” In Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Self-Motion, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 35–63.Google Scholar
Frey, Christopher 2015a. “Two Conceptions of Soul in Aristotle.” In Ebrey, David (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137–160.Google Scholar
Frey, Christopher 2015b. “From Blood to Flesh: Homonymy, Unity, and Ways of Being in Aristotle.” Ancient Philosophy 35(2): 375–394.Google Scholar
Grasso, R. 2013. “Receiving Forms without the Matter in Aristotle’s DA II 12.” Philosophical Inquiry, 36(1–2): 23–44.Google Scholar
Gelber, Jessica. 2020. “Soul’s Tools.” In Heat, Pneuma and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Medicine, King, C. and Bartoš, H. (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 243–259.Google Scholar
Gendler, Tamar. 2008. “Alief in Action (And Reaction).” Mind and Language 23: 552–585.Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd. 2004. “The Unity of Intellect in Aristotle’s ‘De Anima.’” Phronesis 49, 4: 348–373.Google Scholar
Gill, Mary Louise. 1989. Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Golitsis, Pantelis. 2016. “John Philoponus’ Commentary on the Third Book of Aristotle’s De Anima, Wrongly Attributed to Stephanus.” In Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Re-Interpreted. New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators. London: Bloomsbury, 393–412.Google Scholar
Graham, D. 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graeser, Andreas. 1977. “On Language, Thought, and Reality in Ancient Greek Philosophy.” Dialectica 31(3–4):359–388.Google Scholar
Graeser, Andreas 1978. “Aristotle’s Framework of Sensibilia.” In Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.), Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 69–97.Google Scholar
Greco, John and Groff, Ruth. (eds.), 2012. Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gregoric, Pavel. 2007. Aristotle on the Common Sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregoric, Pavel 2020. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on the Common Sense.” In Mousavian, S. and Fink, J. (eds.), The Internal Senses in the Aristotelian Tradition. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 29–44.Google Scholar
Gregoric, Pavel 2021. “Perceiving that We are Not Seeing and Hearing: Reflexive Awareness in Aristotle.” In Fink, J. and Gregoric, P. (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 119–138.Google Scholar
Gregoric, G. and Pfeiffer, C.. 2015. “Grasping Aristotle’s Intellect.” Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 26: 13–31.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1962–1981. A History of Greek Philosophy, 6 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hadot, Ilsetraut. 1997. “Aspects de la théorie de la perception chez les néoplatoniciens: sensation (aisthēsis), sensation commune (koinē aisthēsis) at de conscience de soi (sunaisthēsis).” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8: 33–87.Google Scholar
Hahmann, Andree. 2014. “Kann man Aristoteles’ Philosophie der Wahrnehmung noch für wahr nehmen?.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 121: 3–32.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D.W. 1968. Aristotle De Anima, Books II and III (with passages from Book I). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heinaman, Robert. 1990. “Aristotle and the Mind-Body Problem.” Phronesis 35 (1): 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Devin. 2006. “Understanding Aristotle’s Reproductive Hylomorphism.” Apeiron 39: 257–287.Google Scholar
Hicks, Robert Drew. (ed.), trans., and commentary, 1907. Aristotle, De Anima. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hussey, Edward. 2012. “Aristotle on Earlier Natural Science.” In Shields, Christopher (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–45.Google Scholar
Hutto, Daniel D. and Myin, Erik. 2013. Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds Without Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 2005. “Empedocles on Colour and Colour Vision.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 1–37.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank. 1977. Perception: A Representative Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, Thomas Kjeller. 1997. Aristotle on the Sense-Organs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kjeller, Johansen Thomas . 2002. “Imprinted on the Mind: Active and Passive in Aristotle’s Theory of Sense-Perception.” In Saunders, B. and van Brakel, J. (eds.), Theories, Tecnologies, Instrumentalities of Colour, United States: University Press of America, 169–188.Google Scholar
Johansen, Thomas Kjeller 2005. “In Defense of Inner Sense: Aristotle on Perceiving that One Sees.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 21: 235–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, Thomas Kjeller 2009. “From Plato’s Timaeus to Aristotle’s De Caelo: The Case of the Missing World Soul.” In Bowen, Alan and Wildberg, Christian (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo, Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, 9–28.Google Scholar
Johansen, Thomas Kjeller 2012. The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Mark. 2012. “Aristotle on Odour and Smell.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 143–183.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Mark 2015. “Aristotle and Alexander on Perceptual Error.” Phronesis 60(3): 310–338.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Mark 2021. “Aristotle on the Unity of Touch.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 59(1): 23–43.Google Scholar
Judson, L. 1991. “Chance and ‘Always or for the Most Part’ in Aristotle.” In Judson, Lindsay (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, New York: Oxford University Press, 73–99.Google Scholar
Judson, L. 2018. “Physics I.5.” In Quarantotto, D. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics Book I: A Systematic Exploration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 130–153, DOI: 10.1017/9781108181853.007.Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles H. 1960. “Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrine of the Soul.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42: 3–35.Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles H. 1992. “Aristotle on Thinking.” In Craven Nussbaum, Martha and Rorty, Amélie (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 359–380.Google Scholar
Kalderon, Mark Eli. 2015. Form Without Matter: Empedocles and Aristotle on Color Perception. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. 2019. Aristotle’s Method in Ethics: Philosophy in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, Colin Guthrie. 2020. “Δόξαι and the Tools of Dialectic in De Anima I.1–3.” In Fink, J. and Gregoric, P. (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind., New York: Routledge, 119–138.Google Scholar
Kirk, G., Raven, J., and Schofield, M. [KRS]. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koons, Benjamin Robert. 2019. “Aristotle’s Infallible Perception.” Apeiron 52(4): 415–443.Google Scholar
Kosman, Aryeh. 1975. “Perceiving that We Perceive: On the Soul III, 2.” The Philosophical Review 84: 499–519.Google Scholar
Kosman, Aryeh 1992. “What Does the Maker Mind Make.” In Nussbaum, Martha Craven and Rorty, Amélie (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 343–358.Google Scholar
Kosman, Aryeh 2005. “Commentary on Johansen.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 21: 277–286.Google Scholar
Kosman, Aryeh 2013. The Activity of Being: An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
Kullman, Wolfgang. 2012. “Aristotle’s Gradual Turn from Dialectic.” In Fink, Jakob Leth (ed.), The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 296–315.Google Scholar
Lautner, Peter. 1992. “Philoponus, In De Anima III: Quest for an Author.” The Classical Quarterly 42: 510–522.Google Scholar
Lautner, Peter 1994. “Rival Theories of Self-Awareness in Late Neoplatonism.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 39: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lautner, Peter 2000. “Plutarch of Athens on koinē aisthēsis and phantasia.” Ancient Philosophy 20: 425–146.Google Scholar
Lautner, Peter 2004. “The koinē aisthēsis in Proclus and Ps.-Simplicius.” Philosophy, Science, and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 83: 163–173.Google Scholar
Lautner, Peter 2014. “Perceptual Awareness in the Ancient Commentators.” In Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, London: Routledge, 323–338.Google Scholar
Lear, Jonathan. 1988. Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lebrecht, S., Bar, M., Feldman Barrett, L. and Tarr, M. J.. 2012. “Micro-Valences: Perceiving Affective Valence in Everyday Objects.” Frontiers in Psychology 3: 1–5.Google Scholar
Lee, Mi-Kyoung. 2011. “The Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities in Ancient Greek Philosophy.” In Nolan, Lawrence (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15–40.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, David, 2021. “Looking for the Formative Power in Aristotle’s Nutritive Soul.” In Koromplii, G. and Lo Presti, R. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 2014. “Aristotle on the Emergence of Material Complexity.” HOPOS 4(2): 272–305.Google Scholar
Lewis, F. 2003. “Is there Room for Anaxagoras in an Aristotelian Theory of Mind?” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 89–129.Google Scholar
Long, A. 1966. “Thinking and Sense-perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism?” Classical Quarterly 16: 256–276.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Hendrik. 2006. The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Hendrik 2007. “The Assimilation of Sense to Sense-Object in Aristotle.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33: 179–220.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Hendrik 2009. “Review of Pavel Gregoric, Aristotle on the Common Sense.” Rhizai 6: 225–231.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl F. 2000. “Thinking about Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science 67(1):1–25.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1990. “Doxography and Dialectic: the Sitz in Leben of the Placita.” In Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, Teil II: Principat, Band, 36.4. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter, 3056–3229.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, Anna. 2014. Aristotle on Perceiving Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. 2010. Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Menn, Stephen. 2002. “Aristotle’s Definition of Soul and the Programme of the De Anima.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 22: 83–139.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. 1994. “Truth and Thought in the De Anima.” In Alberti, A. (ed.), Realtà e ragione. Studi di filosofia antica, Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 137–55.Google Scholar
Miller, Fred D. 2012. “Aristotle on the Separability of Mind.” In Shields, Christopher (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 306–339.Google Scholar
Miller, Fred D. 2018. Aristotle: On the Soul and Other Psychological Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mirus, Christopher V. 2001. “Homonymy and the Matter of a Living Body.” Ancient Philosophy 21 (2):357–373.Google Scholar
Modrak, Deborah. 1981a. “An Aristotelian Theory of Consciousness?.” Ancient Philosophy 1: 160–170.Google Scholar
Modrak, Deborah 1981b. “Koinē aisthēsis and the Discrimination of Sensible Differences in de Anima III.2.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11: 405–423.Google Scholar
Modrak, Deborah 1986. “Φαντασία Reconsidered.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68(1): 47–69.Google Scholar
Modrak, Deborah 1987. Aristotle: The Power of Perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morsink, Johannes. 1982. Aristotle on the Generation of Animals: A Philosophical Study. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Moss, Jessica 2014. “Right Reason in Plato and Aristotle: On the Meaning of ‘Logos.’” Phronesis 59: 181–230.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. 1984. “Aristotle’s Rationalist Account of Qualitative Interaction.” Phronesis 29: 1–16.Google Scholar
Noë, Alva. 2009. Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons From the Biology of Consciousness. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Nolan, Lawrence. (ed.), 2011. Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. and Oksenberg Rorty, Amélie (eds.). 1992. Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ogden, Stephen R. 2016. “Individuation and the Afterlife in Thomas Aquinas and Some Muslim Philosophers.” In Ogden, Stephen, Klima, Gyula, and Hall, Alexander, (eds.), The Metaphysics of Personal Identity, Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics, Cambridge Scholars, 33–62.Google Scholar
Osborne, Catherine. 1983. “Aristotle, De Anima 3.2: How Do We Perceive that We See and Hear.” Classical Quarterly 33: 401–411.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1968. Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics. Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Owens, Joseph. 1982. “Aristotle on Common Sensibles and Incidental Perception.” Phoenix 36: 215–236.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. 2011. “Scholastic Qualities, Primary and Secondary.” In Nolan, Lawrence (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 41–61.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, Pierre. 2018. “What is Aristotle’s Generation of Animals about?” In Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–88.Google Scholar
Perälä, Mika. 2019. “Perceiving that We Hear and See in Aristotle’s De anima.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 101: 317–344.Google Scholar
Peramatzis, Michail. 2011. Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perkams, Matthias. 2005. “Priscian of Lydia. Commentator on the De anima in the Tradition of Iamblichus.” Mnemosyne 58: 510–530.Google Scholar
Perkams, Matthias 2008. Selbstbewusstsein in der Spätantike. Die neuplatonische Kommentare zu Aristoteles’ De anima. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Philoponus, John. 1966. Commentaire sur le de anima d’Aristote, traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke. Verbeke, G. (ed.), Paris: Editions Béatrice-Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Philoponus, John 2014. On Aristotle on the Soul 1.3–5. Trans. Philip J. van der Eijk. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Politis, Vasilis. 2001. “Aristotle’s Account of the Intellect as Pure Capacity.” Ancient Philosophy 21(2): 375–402.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. 2002. Aristoteles:Rhetorik: Übersetzt and erläutert von Chrisof Rapp. Be rlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Remes, Pauliina. 2007. Plotinus on Self. The Philosophy of the “We”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1998. “Dialectic and Philosophy in Aristotle.” In Gentzler, J., (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 227–252.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2017. Aristotle: De Anima. Translated with Introduction and Notes. Indianapolis, IN/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Richardson, Henry S. 1992. “Desire and the Good in De Anima.” In Nussbaum, Martha C and Oksenberg Rorty, Amélie (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 381–400.Google Scholar
Scaltsas, T. 1996. “Biological Matter and Perceptual Powers in Aristotle’s De anima.” Topoi 14: 25–37.Google Scholar
Scheiter, Krisanna. 2012. “Images, Appearances and Phantasia in Aristotle.” Phronesis 57(3): 251–278.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1992/1995. “Aristotle on the Imagination”. In Craven Nussbaum, Martha and Rorty, Amélie (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 249–278.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 1997. “‘Becoming Like God’ in the Timaeus and Aristotle.” In Calvo, T. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag 9, 327–339.Google Scholar
Sedley, David 2007. Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Segvic, H. 2002. “Aristotle’s Metaphysics of Action.” In Meixner, Uwe and Newen, Albert (eds.), Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, Volume 5, Issue 1: Focus: Medieval Philosophy, Leiden: Brill, 23–53.Google Scholar
Sharples, Robert W. 1994. Alexander of Aphrodisias: Quaestiones 2.16–3.15. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W 2004. Alexander of Aphrodisias: Supplement to On the Soul. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sharples, Robert W. 2008. Alexander Aphrodisiensis, De anima Libri Mantissa: A New Edition of the Greek Text, with Introduction and Commentary. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shields, Christopher John. 1993. “The Homonymy of the Body in Aristotle.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 75(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
Shields, Christopher John 2007. “The Priority of Soul in Aristotle’s De Anima: Mistaking Categories?” In Frede, Dorothea and Reis, Burkhard (eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, Berlin: Gruyter, 267–290.Google Scholar
Shields, Christopher John 2011. “Die Seele.” In Rapp, C. and Corcilius, K. (eds.), Beiträge zur Aristotelischen Handlungstheorie, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 313–323.Google Scholar
Shields, Christopher John 2013. “The Phainomenological Method in Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” In Feser, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics, Oxford, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 7–27.Google Scholar
Shields, Christopher John 2016. De Anima. Translation and Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shields, Christopher John 2020. “In Dialogue about Harmony.” In Revisiting Aristotle’s Fragments, Mesquita, A. P., Noriega-Olmos, S., and Shields, C. J., (eds.), Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 141–162.Google Scholar
[Simplicius]. 1995. On Aristotle’s On the Soul 3.1–5, Blumenthal, H. J., (trans.), London: Duckworth and Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, William M. R., Koons, Robert Charles, and Teh, Nicholas. (eds.), 2017. Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science. Routledge.Google Scholar
Singpurwalla, Rachel. 2010. “The Tripartite Theory of Motivation in Plato’s Republic.” Philosophy Compass 5(11): 880–892.Google Scholar
Sisko, John E. 1999. “On Separating the Intellect from the Body: Aristotle’s De Anima III.4, 429a10-b5.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 81(3): 249–267.Google Scholar
Siwek, Paulus. ed. and commentary, 1965. Tractatus De Anima; Graece et Latine. Roma: Desclée, Editori Pontifici.Google Scholar
Sophonias. 1883. In Libros Aristotelis De Anima Paraphrasis. Hayduck, M. (ed.), Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 1971. “Aristotle on Demarcating the Five Senses.” The Philosophical Review 80: 55–79.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard 1972. “Aristotle, Mathematics and Colour.” The Classical Quarterly 22(2): 293–308.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard 1992/1995. “Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle’s Theory of Sense-Perception.” In Nussbaum, Martha Craven and Rorty, Amélie (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 195–225.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard 2003. The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: A Sourcebook. Vol. 1: Psychology. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard 2004. “Aristotle’s Perceptual Functions Permeated by Platonist Reason.” In Mace, C. and van Riel, G. (eds.), Platonic Ideas and Concept Formation in Ancient and Medieval Thought, Leuven: Leuven University Press, 99–118.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. 1997. “Simplicius”: On Aristotle’s On the Soul 2.5–12. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos 2006. “Proklos über Selbstreflexion und Selbstbegründung.” In Perkams, M. and Piccione, R. M. (eds.), Proklos: Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik. Leiden: Brill, 230–55.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos 2013. “Simplicius”: On Aristotle On the Soul 3.6–13. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos 2017. “Newly Discovered Scholia from Philoponus’ Lost Commentary on De anima III.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médievale 84: 223–243.Google Scholar
Stevens, Annick. 2009. “L’apparition de la conscience dans le De anima et d’autres œuvres d’Aristote.” In van Riel, G. and Destrée, P. (eds.), Ancient Perspectives on Aristotle’s De anima, Leuven: Leuven University Press, 35–48.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1983. “The Arguments in the Phaedo Concerning the Thesis that the Soul is a harmonia.” In Anton, John P. and Preus, Anthony (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek philosophy, vol. 2. Albany: SUNY, 217–231.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. C. 2009. (tr.), Averroes (Ibn Rushd) of Cordova: Long Commentary on The De Anima of Aristotle. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Themistius. 1899. Themistii in libros Aristotelis De anima paraphrasis (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, 5.3). Berlin: G. Reimer.Google Scholar
Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, Friedrich Adolph. 1833. Aristotelis De anima libri tres Jena: Sumtibus Walzii.Google Scholar
Twomey, R. 2019. “Aristotle’s Disjunctivism.” In Hetherington, Stephen and Smith, Nicolas D. (eds.), What the Ancients Offer to Contemporary Epistemology. What the Ancients Offer to Contemporary Epistemology, New York: Routledge, 140–156.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan, and Rosch, Eleanor. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vasiliou, I. 1996. “Perception, Knowledge, and the Sceptic in Aristotle.” OSAP XIV: 83–131.Google Scholar
Viano, Cristina. 1996. “La Doxographie du De Anima (I, 2–5), ou le Contre-modele de l’Ame.” In Viano, Cristina and Dherbey, Gilbert Romeyer (eds.), Corps et âme: Études sur le De Anima, Paris: Vrin, 51–79.Google Scholar
Ward, Julie K. 1996. “Souls and Figures: Defining the Soul in De anima II.” Ancient Philosophy 16 (1): 113–128.Google Scholar
Ward, Julie K. 1988. “Perception and Logos in De anima ii 12.” Ancient Philosophy 8(2): 217.Google Scholar
Wedin, Michael V. 1988. Mind and Imagination in Aristotle. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Westerink, Leendert Gerrit, ed. and trans. 1976. The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo. Vol. 2, Damascius. Netherlands: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1986. “Hylomorphism.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4: 189–199.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. C. 1904. “On the Platonic Doctrine of the asumbletoi arithmoi.” Classical Review 18: 247–260.Google Scholar