Aristotle, , Metaphysics, ed. Ross, W. D. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. McKeon, Richard (New York: Random House, 1941).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Aristoteles Latinus XXV 3 Metaphysica, lib. I–XIV. Recensio et Translatio Guillelmi de Moerbeka, 2 vols., ed. Vuillemin-Diem, Gudrun (Leiden: Brill, 1995).Google Scholar

Avicenna, , Liber de philosophia prima sive scientia divina, ed. Verbeke, Gérard (Leuven: Peeters, 1983).Google Scholar

Avicenna, Liber Primus Naturalium: Tractatus Secundus de Motu et de Consimilibus, ed. Van Riet, Simone, Janssens, Jules L. Allard, André and Verbeke, Gérard (Brussels: Académie Royale de Belgique, 2006).Google Scholar

Pattin, Adriaan (ed.), “Le Liber de causis : Édition établie à l’aide de 90 manuscrits avec introduction et notes par A. Pattin O.M.L.,” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 28 (1966): 90–203.Google Scholar

Pseudo-Dionysius, , De divinis nominibus, in Patrologiae cursus completus, Series Graeca, ed. Migne, J. P., vol. 3 (Paris, 1857).Google Scholar

Spinoza, , Ethics, trans. Curley, Edwin (London and New York: Penguin Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas, , Opera omnia iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita (Rome: Ex Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide, 1888–).Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas, , In quatuor libros Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi episcopi Parisiensis, ed. Mandonnet, Pierre and Moos, Marie Fabien (Paris: P. Lethielleux, 1929–47).Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas, , In librum De causis expositio, ed. Saffrey, H. D. (Fribourg [Suisse] and Louvain: Société Philosophique-Nauwelaerts, 1954).Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas, , Summa contra Gentiles, vols. 2–3, ed. Marc, P., Pera, C. and Caramello, P. (Taurini-Rome: Marietti, 1961).Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas, , In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum expositio, ed. Cathala, M.-R. and Spiazzi, R. M. (Taurini-Rome: Marietti, 1964).Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas, , Quaestiones disputatae de potentia, in Quaestiones disputatae, vol. 2, ed. Pession, P. M. (Taurini-Rome: Marietti, 1965), 1–276.Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas, , Quaestiones disputatae de virtutibus, in Quaestiones disputatae, vol. 2, ed. Odetto, E. (Taurini-Rome: Marietti, 1965), 707–828.Google Scholar

Adams, Marilynn McCord, Some Later Medieval Theories of the Eucharist (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Albertson, J. S., “Instrumental Causality in St. Thomas,” New Scholasticism 28 (1954): 409–35.Google Scholar

Anjum, Rani Lill and Mumford, Stephen, What Tends to Be: The Philosophy of Dispositional Modality (London and New York: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. M., What Is a Law of Nature? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldner, Stephen, “Aquinas on Celestial Matter,” The Thomist 68:3 (2004): 431–67.Google Scholar

Baldner, Stephen, “Albertus Magnus and the Categorization of Motion,” The Thomist 70 (2006): 203–35.Google Scholar

Bobik, Joseph, Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements: A Translation and Interpretation of the de Principiis Naturae and the de Mixtione Elementorum of St. Thomas Aquinas (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Boland, Vivian, “Aquinas and Simplicius on Dispositions,” New Blackfriars 82 (2001): 467–78.Google Scholar

Brock, Stephen, Action and Conduct: Thomas Aquinas and the Theory of Action (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000).Google Scholar

Brock, Stephen, “Causality and Necessity in Thomas Aquinas,” Quaestio 2:1 (2002): 217–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brower, Jeffrey E., Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Brower-Toland, Susan, “Causation and Mental Content: Against the Externalist Reading of Ockham,” in Pelletier, Jenny and Roques, Magali (eds.), The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Claude Panaccio (Cham: Springer, 2017), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burrell, David, “Aquinas and Jewish and Islamic Authors,” in Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 65–72.Google Scholar

Calma, Dragos (ed.), Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes Volume 1: Western Scholarly Networks and Debates (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar

Carl, Brian, “Action, Supposit, Subject: Interpreting Actiones Sunt Suppositorum,” Nova et Vetera 17:2 (2019): 545–65.Google Scholar

Carl, Brian, “Thomas Aquinas on the Proportionate Causes of Living Species,” Scientia et Fides 8:2 (2020): 223–48.Google Scholar

Clarke, Norris, “Action as the Self-Revelation of Being: A Central Theme in the Thought of St. Thomas,” in Explorations in Metaphysics (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994), 45–64.Google Scholar

Cory, David, “Thomas Aquinas on How the Soul Moves the Body,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 8 (2020): 146–87.Google Scholar

Cory, Therese Scarpelli, Aquinas on Human Self-Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Cory, Therese Scarpelli, “Rethinking Abstractionism: Aquinas’s Intellectual Light and Some Arabic Sources,” Journal for the History of Philosophy 53:4 (2015): 607–46.Google Scholar

Courtenay, William, “Covenant and Causality in Pierre D’Ailly,” Speculum 46:1 (1971): 94–119.Google Scholar

Courtenay, William, “The King and the Leaden Coin: The Economic Background of ‘Sine Qua Non’ Causality,” Traditio 28 (1972): 185–209.Google Scholar

Cross, Richard, “Accidents, Substantial Forms, and Causal Powers in the Late Thirteenth Century: Some Reflections on the Axiom ‘actiones sunt suppositorum,’” in Erismann, Christophe and Schniewind, Alexandrine (eds.), Compléments de substance: études sur les propriétés accidentelles offertes à Alain de Libera (Paris: Vrin, 2008), 133–46.Google Scholar

de Libera, Alain, “Les actions appartiennent aux sujets: petite archéologie d’un principe leibnizien,” in Caroti, Stefano et al. (eds.), Ad ingenii acuitionem: Studies in Honor of Alfonso Maierù (Louvain-La-Neuve, BE: Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Etudes Médiévales, 2007), 199–219.Google Scholar

Decaen, Christopher, “Elemental Virtual Presence in St. Thomas,” The Thomist 64:2 (2000): 271–300.Google Scholar

Decaen, Christopher, “An Inductive Study of the Notion of Equivocal Causality in St. Thomas,” The Thomist 79:2 (2015): 213–63.Google Scholar

Des Chene, Dennis, Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Dodds, Michael J., Unlocking Divine Action: Contemporary Science and Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Doig, James, “Aquinas and Aristotle,” in Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 33–41.Google Scholar

Doolan, Gregory, Aquinas on Divine Ideas as Exemplar Causes (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Fabro, Cornelio, Participation et causalité selon St. Thomas D’aquin (Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain, 1961).Google Scholar

Fakhry, M., Islamic Occasionalism and Its Critique by Averroës and Aquinas (London: Routledge, 1958).Google Scholar

Finance, Joseph, Être et agir dans la philosophie de Saint Thomas (Paris: Beauchesne, 1945).Google Scholar

Fisher, Kendall, “Thomas Aquinas on Hylomorphism and the In-Act Principle,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25:6 (2017): 1053–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Antonia, Thomas Aquinas on Bodily Identity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frost, Gloria, “Aquinas’s Ontology of Transeunt Causal Activity,” Vivarium 56 (2018): 47–82.Google Scholar

Frost, Gloria, “Aquinas on the Intension and Remission of Accidental Forms,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 7 (2019): 116–46.Google Scholar

Frost, Gloria, “What Is an Action? Peter Auriol vs. Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysics of Causality,” Ergo 6:43 (2020): 1259–85.Google Scholar

Frost, Gloria, “Aquinas on Passive Powers,” Vivarium 59:1–2 (2021): 33–51.Google Scholar

Frost, Gloria, “Three Competing Views of God’s Causation of Creaturely Actions: Aquinas, Scotus and Olivi,” in Ganssle, Gregory (ed.), Divine Causation (New York: Routledge, 2021), 66–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goddu, André, “William of Ockham’s Arguments for Action at a Distance,” Franciscan Studies 44 (1984): 227–44.Google Scholar

Haldane, John, “Identifying Privative Causes,” Analysis 71:4 (2011): 611–19.Google Scholar

Hankey, Wayne, “Aquinas, Plato, and Neo-Platonism,” in Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 55–64.Google Scholar

Hausman, Daniel, Causal Asymmetries, Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction and Decision Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 36–54.Google Scholar

Heinaman, R., “Is Aristotle’s Definition of Change Circular?” Apeiron 27:1 (1994): 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Paul, “Does Efficient Causation Presuppose Final Causation? Aquinas vs. Early Modern Mechanism,” in Jorgensen, Larry and Newlands, Samuel (eds.), Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 297–312.Google Scholar

Huisman, Tyler, “Aristotle on Accidental Causation,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (2016): 561–75.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Jonathan (ed.), Causal Powers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K., The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Johnson, Joel, “Final Causality in the Thought of Thomas Aquinas,” PhD diss., Purdue University, 2018, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 10840028.Google Scholar

Kane, W. Declan, “The Subject of Predicamental Action according to John of St. Thomas,” The Thomist 22:3 (1959): 66–388.Google Scholar

Kedar, Yael, “Laying the Foundation for the Nomological Image of Nature: From Corporeity in Robert Grosseteste (c. 1168–1253) to Species in Roger Bacon (1220–1292),” in Cunningham, J. P. (ed.), Robert Grosseteste and the Pursuit of Religious and Scientific Learning in the Middle-Ages (New York: Springer, 2016), 165–85.Google Scholar

Keele, Rondo, “Can God Make a Picasso? William Ockham and Walter Chatton on Divine Power and Real Relations,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45:3 (2007): 395–411.Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony, Aquinas on Mind (London and New York: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar

Kent, Bonnie, “Dispositions and Moral Fallibility: The UnAristotelian Aquinas,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (2012): 141–57.Google Scholar

Kent, Bonnie, “Losable Virtue: Aquinas on Character and Will,” in Hoffmann, Tobias, Muller, Jorn and Perkams, Matthias (eds.), Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kent, Matthew, “Prime Matter according to St. Thomas,” PhD diss., Fordham University, 2006, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 3201130.Google Scholar

Kim, Yul, “Why Does the Wood Not Ignite Itself? Duns Scotus’s Defense of the Will’s Self-Motion,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 95:1 (2021): 49–68.Google Scholar

King, Peter, “Duns Scotus on the Reality of Self-Change,” in Gill, Mary Louise and Lennox, James (eds.), Self-Motion from Aristotle to Newton (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), 227–90.Google Scholar

Kovach, Francis J., “Aquinas’s Theory of Action at a Distance: A Critical Analysis,” in Scholastic Challenges to Mediaeval and Modern Ideas (Stillwater, OK: Western Publications, 1987), 147–78.Google Scholar

Kretzmann, Norman, “A General Problem of Creation,” in MacDonald, Scott (ed.), Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991), 208–28.Google Scholar

Künzle, P., Das Verhältnis der Seele zu ihren Potenzen: Problemgeschichtliche Untersuchungen von Augustin bis und mit Thomas von Aquin (Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 1956).Google Scholar

Lagerlund, Henrik, “The Unity of Efficient and Final Causality: The Mind/Body Problem Reconsidered,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19:4 (2011): 587–603.Google Scholar

Lewis, David, “Causation,” Journal of Philosophy 70:17 (1973): 556–67.Google Scholar

Lisska, Anthony J., Aquinas’s Theory of Perception (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Little, Ambrose, “Are You What You Eat or Something More?,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92:1 (2018): 1–20.Google Scholar

Lonergan, Bernard, Grace and Freedom: Operative Grace in the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas, in The Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, vol. 1, ed. Crowe, Frederick and Doran, Robert (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Lorkowski, C. M., “Hume, David: Causation,” in The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.iep.utm.edu/, accessed April 1, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovejoy, Arthur, The Great Chain of Being: The Study of the History of an Idea (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Löwe, Can Laurens, “Mind over Matter: Aquinas’s Transformation of Aristotle’s Definition of Change,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 82:1 (2015): 45–68.Google Scholar

Löwe, Can Laurens, “Peter Auriol on the Metaphysics of Efficient Causation,” Vivarium 55:4 (2017): 239–72.Google Scholar

Löwe, Can Laurens, “Aristotle and John Buridan on the Individuation of Causal Powers,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 6 (2018): 189–222.Google Scholar

Löwe, Can Laurens, “John Duns Scotus versus Thomas Aquinas on Action–Passion Identity,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26:6 (2018): 1027–44.Google Scholar

Löwe, Can Laurens, Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Human Act (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, Reginald, The Cleansing of the Heart: The Sacraments as Instrumental Causes in the Thomistic Tradition (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

MacDonald, Scott, “Aquinas’s Parasitic Cosmological Argument,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1 (1991): 119–55.Google Scholar

Majcherek, Kamil, “Walter Chatton’s Rejection of Final Causality,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 7 (2019): 212–42.Google Scholar

Maier, Anneliese, “Causes, Forces and Resistance,” in On the Threshold of Exact Science, trans. Steven Sargent (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982), 40–60.Google Scholar

Maier, Anneliese, “The Theory of the Elements and the Problem of Their Presence in Compounds,” in On the Threshold of Exact Science, trans. Steven Sargent (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982), 124–42.Google Scholar

Makin, Stephen, “Aquinas, Natural Tendencies, and Natural Kinds,” New Scholasticism 63.3 (1989): 253–74.Google Scholar

McDermott, Timothy, “The Subject of Predicamental Action,” The Thomist 23 (1960): 189–210.Google Scholar

Meehan, Francis X., Efficient Causality in Aristotle and St. Thomas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1940).Google Scholar

Miller, Marianne T., “The Problem of Action in the Commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas on the Physics of Aristotle,” Modern Schoolman, 23:3–4 (1946): 135–67; 200–26.Google Scholar

Morris, William Edward and Charlotte R., Brown, “David Hume,” in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), ehttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume/, accessed May 31, 2021.Google Scholar

Mumford, “The Power of Power,” in Groff, Ruth and Greco, John (eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 2013), 9–24.Google Scholar

Mumford, Stephen and Anjum, Rani Lill, “The Irreducibility of Dispositionalism,” in Hüntelmann, Rafael and Hattler, Johannes (eds.), New Scholasticism Meets Analytic Philosophy (Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae, 2014), 105–28.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven, “No Necessary Connection: The Medieval Roots of the Occasionalist Roots of Hume,” The Monist 79:3 (1996): 462–63.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven, “Malebranche on Causation,” in Nadler, Steven (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 112–38.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven, “Doctrines of Explanation in Late Scholasticism and Mechanical Philosophy,” in Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers (eds.), Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 513–52.Google Scholar

Oderberg, David, Real Essentialism (New York: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

Ott, Walter R., Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Paasch, J. T., Divine Production in Late Medieval Trinitarian Theology: Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Page, Ben, “Thomas Aquinas, ‘the Greatest Advocate of Dispositional Modality’,” Studia Neoaristotelica 14:2 (2017): 167–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pasnau, Robert, “Intentionality and Final Causes,” in Perler, Dominik (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (Leiden: Brill, 2001), 301–23.Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert, Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa Theologiae 1a, 75–89 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert, “Scholastic Qualities, Primary and Secondary,” in Nolan, Lawrence (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pasnau, Robert, Metaphysical Themes: 1274–1671 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert, “Teleology in the Later Middle Ages,” in McDonough, Jeffrey (ed.), Teleology: A History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 90–115.Google Scholar

Pawl, Timothy, “The Five Ways,” in Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 115–31.Google Scholar

Péghaire, Julien, “L’axiome ‘bonum est diffusivum sui’ dans le néoplatonisme et le thomisme,” Revue de l’Université d’Ottawa 1 (1932): 5–30.Google Scholar

Perler, Dominik and Ulrich, Rudolph, Occasionalismus: Theorien der Kausalität im arabisch-islamischen und im europäischen Denken (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000).Google Scholar

Pierson, Daniel, “Thomas Aquinas on the Principle omne agens agit sibi simile,” PhD diss., Catholic University of America, 2015, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 3705731.Google Scholar

Pilsner, Joseph, The Specification of Human Actions in St. Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Richardson, Kara, “Avicenna’s Conception of the Efficient Cause,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2013): 220–39.Google Scholar

Richardson, Kara, “Causation in Arabic and Islamic Thought,” in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/arabic-islamic-causation/, accessed May 31, 2021.Google Scholar

Rosemann, Philip, Omne agens agit sibi simile: A “Repetition” of Scholastic Metaphysics (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Rota, Michael, “Causation,” in Davies, Brian and Stump (, Eleonoreeds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 104–14.Google Scholar

Russell, John, “Action and Reaction before Newton,” British Journal for the History of Science 9:1 (1976): 25–38.Google Scholar

Sangiacomo, Andrea, “Sine qua non Causation: The Legacy of Malebranche’s Occasionalism in Kant’s New Elucidation,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 9 (2018): 215–48.Google Scholar

Schmaltz, Tad M., Descartes on Causation (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Schmid, Stephan, “Teleology and the Dispositional theory of Causation in Thomas Aquinas,” Logical Analysis and the History of Philosophy 14 (2011): 21–39.Google Scholar

Shanley, Brian, “Divine Causation and Human Freedom in Aquinas,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72:1 (1998): 99–122.Google Scholar

Solère, Jean-Luc, “Scotus versus Aquinas on Instrumental Causality,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 7 (2019): 147–85.Google Scholar

Storck, Michael Hector, “Parts, Wholes, and Presence by Power: A Response to Gordon P. Barnes,” Review of Metaphysics 62:1 (2008): 45–59.Google Scholar

Swanstrom, Julie, “Creation as Efficient Causation in Aquinas,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93:1 (2019): 1–27.Google Scholar

Te velde, Rudi, Aquinas on God (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Tomarchio, John, “Four Indices for the Thomistic Principle Quod recipitur in aliquo est in eo per modum recipientis,” Mediaeval Studies 60:1 (1998): 315–67.Google Scholar

Tomarchio, John, “Thomistic Axiomatics in an Age of Computers,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 16:3 (1999): 249–75.Google Scholar

Tomarchio, John, “Aquinas’s Division of Being according to Modes of Existing,” Review of Metaphysics 54:3 (2001): 585–613.Google Scholar

Torrell, Jean-Pierre, Saint Thomas Aquinas: The Person and His Work (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press of America, 1996).Google Scholar

Toth, Zita, “Medieval Problems of Secondary Causation and Divine Concurrence,” PhD diss., Fordham University, 2017, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 10273316.Google Scholar

Trifolgi, Cecilia, “Thomas Wylton on Motion,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77:2 (1995): 135–54.Google Scholar

Tuttle, Jake, “Suárez’s Non-Reductive Theory of Efficient Causation,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 4 (2016): 125–58.Google Scholar

Vucu, Simona, “Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus on Self-agency and Self-motion: An Inquiry into the Medieval Metaphysics of Causal Powers,” PhD diss., University of Toronto, 2018, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 10641101.Google Scholar

Watts, Jordan, “Natural Final Causality at the University of Paris from 1250 – 1360,” PhD diss., The Catholic University of America, 2015, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 3705758.Google Scholar

Weisheipl, James, “The Principle Omne quod movetur ab alio movetur in Medieval Physics,” Isis 56 (1965): 36–45.Google Scholar

Wippel, John, “Thomas Aquinas’s Derivation of the Aristotelian Categories (Predicaments),” Journal of the History of Philosophy 25:1 (1987): 13–34.Google Scholar

Wippel, John, The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Wippel, John, “Aquinas on God’s Freedom to Create or Not,” in Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007), 218–39.Google Scholar

Wippel, John, “Thomas Aquinas and the Axiom ‘What Is Received Is Received According to the Mode of the Receiver’,” in Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007), 113–22.Google Scholar

Wood, Adam, “The Faculties of the Soul and Some Medieval Mind–Body Problems,” The Thomist 75 (2011): 585–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, Rega, “The Influence of Arabic Aristotelianism on Scholastic Natural Philosophy,” in Pasnau, Robert and Van Dyke, Christina (eds.), The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 247–66.Google Scholar