Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part I Fundamental ideas and general formalisms
- 1 Unfinished revolution
- 2 The fundamental nature of space and time
- 3 Does locality fail at intermediate length scales?
- 4 Prolegomena to any future Quantum Gravity
- 5 Spacetime symmetries in histories canonical gravity
- 6 Categorical geometry and the mathematical foundations of Quantum Gravity
- 7 Emergent relativity
- 8 Asymptotic safety
- 9 New directions in background independent Quantum Gravity
- Questions and answers
- Part II String/M-theory
- Part III Loop quantum gravity and spin foam models
- Part IV Discrete Quantum Gravity
- Part V Effective models and Quantum Gravity phenomenology
- Index
4 - Prolegomena to any future Quantum Gravity
from Part I - Fundamental ideas and general formalisms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part I Fundamental ideas and general formalisms
- 1 Unfinished revolution
- 2 The fundamental nature of space and time
- 3 Does locality fail at intermediate length scales?
- 4 Prolegomena to any future Quantum Gravity
- 5 Spacetime symmetries in histories canonical gravity
- 6 Categorical geometry and the mathematical foundations of Quantum Gravity
- 7 Emergent relativity
- 8 Asymptotic safety
- 9 New directions in background independent Quantum Gravity
- Questions and answers
- Part II String/M-theory
- Part III Loop quantum gravity and spin foam models
- Part IV Discrete Quantum Gravity
- Part V Effective models and Quantum Gravity phenomenology
- Index
Summary
Introduction
“Prolegomena” means “preliminary observations,” and my title is meant to recall Kant's celebrated Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Can Claim to be a Science. My words, like his:
are not supposed to serve as the exposition of an already-existing science, but to help in the invention of the science itself in the first place.
To use another Kantian phrase, I shall discuss some “conditions of possibility” of a quantum theory of gravity, stressing the need for solutions to certain fundamental problems confronting any attempt to apply some method of quantization to the field equations of General Relativity (GR). Not for lack of interest but lack of space-time (S-T), other approaches to Quantum Gravity (QG) are not discussed here (but see).
Background dependence versus background independence
The first problem is the tension between “method of quantization” and “field equations of GR”. The methods of quantization of pre-general-relativistic theories have been based on the existence of some fixed S-T structure(s), needed both for the development of the formalism and – equally importantly – for its physical interpretation. This S-T structure provides a fixed kinematical background for dynamical theories: the equations for particle or fields must be invariant under all automorphisms of the S-T symmetry group. GR theory, on the other hand, is a background-independent theory, without any fixed, non-dynamical S-T structures.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Approaches to Quantum GravityToward a New Understanding of Space, Time and Matter, pp. 44 - 67Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
- 1
- Cited by