Achtner, W. (2011) ‘Infinity as a transformative concept in science and theology’, in Heller, M. and Woodin, W. (eds.) Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge: 19–51.Google Scholar

Ackermann, E. (1979) Lukrez und der Mythos. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Adler, A. (2012) ‘Sensual idealism: the spirit of Epicurus and the politics of finitude in Kant and Hölderlin’, in Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H. (eds.) Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism. New York, NY and Oxford: 199–238.Google Scholar

Agamben, G. (2011) The Sacrament of Language: An Archaeology of the Oath. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Alfieri, V. (1929) Lucrezio. Florence.Google Scholar

Alfonsi, L. (1978) ‘L’avventura di Lucrezio nel mondo antico … e oltre’, in Gigon, O. (ed.) Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur L’Antiquité Classique 24. Geneva: 271–321.Google Scholar

Algra, K., Koenen, M. and Schrijvers, P. (eds.) (1997) Lucretius and his Intellectual Background. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Allen, W. Jr and De Lacy, P. H. (1939) ‘The patrons of Philodemus’, CPh 34: 59–65.Google Scholar

Alter, F. C. (ed.) (1787) Titi Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Vienna.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1968) ‘Two Odes of Horace’s Book Two’, CSCA 1: 35–61.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1995) Review of M. R. Gale (1994) Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. BMCRev 95.04.08.Google Scholar

Annas, J. E. (1992) Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar

Annas, J. E. (ed.) (2001) Cicero: On Moral Ends. Trans. Woolf, R.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1978) The Life of the Mind. New York, NY and London.Google Scholar

Arenson, K. (2016) ‘Epicureans on marriage as sexual therapy’, Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 2.33: 291–311.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. (1995) ‘The impossibility of metathesis: Philodemus and Lucretius on form and content in poetry’, in Obbink, D. (ed.) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford and New York, NY: 210–32.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. (2013) Review of H. Essler (2011) Glückselig und unsterblich: Epikureische Theologie bei Cicero and Philodem (mit einer Edition von PHerc. 152/157, Kol. 8–10). BMCRev 2013.02.37.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) (2004) Vergil, Philodemus and the Augustans. Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Arnaldi, F. (ed.) (1957) Antologia della poesia latina. Naples.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (1955) ‘Filodemo Περὶ θεῶν III fr. 74–82, Pap. Herc. 157’, PP 10: 322–56.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (1958) ‘Filodemo, De dis III, col. X–XI’, SCO 7: 83–99.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (1961) ‘Filodemo, De dis III, col. XII–XIII, 20’, SCO 10: 112–21.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (ed.) (1973) Epicuro: Opere (2nd edn.; 1st edn. 1960). Turin.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (2000) ‘Filodemo fra poesia, mito e storia’, in Erler, M. (ed.) Epikureismus in der späten Republik und der Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart: 13–31.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1970) The Epicurean Theory of Free Will and its Origins in Aristotle. Diss. Yale.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1982) ‘Lucretius’ Venus and Stoic Zeus’, Hermes 110.4: 458–70. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 88–103.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1990) ‘Free action and the swerve’, OSAPh 8: 275–90.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1991) ‘Philodemus’s poetic theory and On the Good King According to Homer’, ClAnt 10: 1–45.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1995) ‘Epicurean poetics’, in Obbink, D. (ed.) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford and New York, NY: 15–34.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1999) ‘Epicurean epistemology’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 260–94.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (2004) ‘Philodemus on sound and sense in poetry’, CronErc 34: 5–27.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (2007) ‘Myth and philosophy in Cleanthes’ Hymn to Zeus’, GRBS 47: 413–29.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (2008a) ‘Lucretius’ new world order: making a pact with nature’, CQ 58: 141–57.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (2008b) ‘Cicero on natural law and the laws of the state’, ClAnt 27: 1–33.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. (2011) Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (ed.) 1971) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (ed.) (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Sextus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Avancius, H. (ed.) (1500) T. Lucretii Cari Libri Sex. Venice.Google Scholar

Avotins, I. (1983) ‘Some Epicurean and Lucretian arguments for the infinity of the universe’, CQ 33: 421–7.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (ed.) (1922) Lucreti De Rerum Natura Libri Sex (2nd edn.; 1st edn. 1900). Oxford.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (ed., trans.) (1926) Epicurus: The Extant Remains. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (1928) The Greek Atomists and Epicurus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (1940) ‘The mind of Lucretius’, TAPhA 61: 278–91. Repr. in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 3–16.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (ed., trans.) (1947) Titi Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex, edited, with prolegomena, critical apparatus, translation and commentary. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Baker, E. (2007) ‘Lucretius in the European Enlightenment’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 274–88.Google Scholar

Bakker, F. A. (2018) ‘The end of Epicurean infinity: critical reflections on the Epicurean infinite universe’, in Bakker, F. A., Bellis, D. and Palmerino, C. (eds.) Space, Imagination and the Cosmos from Antiquity to the Early Modern Period. Cham: 41–67.Google Scholar

Bal, M. (1985) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto.Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. (1993) ‘Half-lines in Virgil: old and new ideas’, SO 68: 144–51.Google Scholar

Baraz, Y. and van den Berg, C. S. (2013) ‘Introduction’, AJPh 134: 1–8.Google Scholar

Barbour, R. (2007) ‘Moral and political philosophy: readings of Lucretius from Virgil to Voltaire’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 149–66.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1999) ‘Venus’ masterplot: Ovid and the Homeric Hymns’, in Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A. and Hinds, S. (eds.) Ovidian Transformations. Essays on the Metamorphoses and its Reception. Cambridge: 112–26.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1979) The Presocratic Philosophers. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar

Baron, E. P. (1986) Lucretius and his Reader: A Study of Book II of De Rerum Natura. Diss. Ohio.Google Scholar

Baronovitch, L. (1984) ‘German idealism, Greek materialism, and the young Karl Marx’, International Philosophical Quarterly 24: 245–66.Google Scholar

Barra, G. (1952) Struttura e composizione del ‘De rerum natura’ di Lucrezio. Naples.Google Scholar

Barra, G. (1984) ‘Il proemio del De rerum natura di Lucrezio’, Vichiana 13: 235–48.Google Scholar

Barrow, J. D. (2005) The Infinite Book: A Short Guide to the Boundless, Timeless and Endless. London.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1971) ‘De l’œuvre au texte’, Revue d’esthétique 3. Trans. in R. Barthes (1977) Image – Music – Text. Ed. and trans. S. Heath. New York, NY: 155–64: ‘From work to text’.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1974) S/Z. Trans. R. Miller. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1975) The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. Miller, R.. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1995) ‘The death of the author’, in Burke, S. (ed.) Authorship: From Plato to Postmodernism, A Reader. Edinburgh: 125–30.Google Scholar

Baudelaire, C. (1955) The Mirror of Art. London.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2009) ‘The Infinity of Lists by Umberto Eco: Is there still life in the list?’, Guardian, 12 December 2009.Google Scholar

Beer, B. (2009) Lukrez und Philodem. Poetische Argumentation und Poetologischer Diskurs. Basel.Google Scholar

Belpaeme, T., Cowley, S. J. and MacDorman, K. F. (eds.) (2007) Symbol Grounding. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Benferhat, Y. (2005) Ciues Epicurei: Les épicuriens et l'idée de la monarchie à Rome et en Italie de Sylla à Octave. Brussels.Google Scholar

Benveniste, É. (1964) ‘Lettres de Ferdinand de Saussure à Antoine Meillet’, Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 21: 93–130.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC.Google Scholar

Bernays, J. (ed.) (1852) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Bersanelli, M. (2011) ‘Infinity and the nostalgia of the stars’, in Heller, M. and Woodin, W. (eds.) Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge: 193–217.Google Scholar

Bignone, E. (1919) ‘Nuove ricerche sul proemio del poema di Lucrezio’, RFIC 47: 423–33.Google Scholar

Bignone, E. (1945) Storia della letteratura Latina. 3 vols. Florence.Google Scholar

Block, N. (ed.) (1980) Readings in Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. I. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1973) The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. New York, NY and Oxford.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (2011) The Anatomy of Influence: Literature as a Way of Life. New Haven, CT and London.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. (1987) Das Lachen der Thrakerin. Eine Urgeschichte der Theorie. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. (2015) The Laughter of the Thracian Woman: A Protohistory of Theory. New York, NY, London, New Delhi and Sydney.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. (2000) ‘Did Epicurus discover the free will problem?’, OSAPh 19: 287–337.Google Scholar

Bockemüller, F. (ed.) (1873–4) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. 2 vols. Stade.Google Scholar

Bollack, J. (1975) La pensée du plaisir: Épicure, textes moraux, commentaires. Paris.Google Scholar

Bollack, J. (1978) La raison de Lucrèce. Paris.Google Scholar

Booth, W. (1961) The Rhetoric of Fiction (2nd edn. 1983). Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Booth, W. (2005) ‘Resurrection of the implied author: why bother?’, in Phelan, J. and Rabinowitz, P. J. (eds.) A Companion to Narrative Theory. Oxford: 75–88.Google Scholar

Borch-Jacobsen, M. (2001) ‘Making psychiatric history: madness as folie à plusieurs’, History of the Human Sciences 14: 19–38.Google Scholar

Bordwell, D. (1985) Narration in the Fiction Film. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Boyd, B. W. (1997) Ovid’s Literary Loves: Influence and Innovation in the Amores. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Breed, B. (2000) ‘Imitations of originality: Theocritus and Lucretius at the start of the Eclogues’, Vergilius 46: 3–20.Google Scholar

Breed, B. (2006) Pastoral Inscriptions: Reading and Writing Virgil’s Eclogues. London.Google Scholar

Brennan, T. C. (2000) The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brieger, A. (ed.) (1899) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex (2nd edn.; 1st edn. 1894). Leipzig.Google Scholar

Bright, D. F. (1971) ‘The plague and the structure of De rerum natura’, Latomus 30: 607–32.Google Scholar

Brown, A. (2010) The Return of Lucretius to Renaissance Florence. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Brown, P. M. (ed.) (1984) Lucretius: De rerum natura I. Bristol.Google Scholar

Brown, R. D. (1982) ‘Lucretius and Callimachus’, ICS 7: 77–97. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 328–50.Google Scholar

Brown, R. D. (ed., trans.) (1987) Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura IV, 1030–1287 with Prolegomena, Text, and Translation. Leiden.Google Scholar

Browning, G. K. (2000) ‘Marx’s doctoral dissertation: the development of a Hegelian thesis’, in Burns, T. and Fraser, I. (eds.) The Hegel–Marx Connection. London: 131–45.Google Scholar

Buchheit, V. (1971) ‘Epikurs Triumph des Geistes’, Hermes 99: 303–23. Trans. Reitz, B. in Gale, M. R. (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 104–31: ‘Epicurus’ triumph of the mind’ (with Addendum [2005]).Google Scholar

Buchheit, V. (1984) ‘Lukrez über den Ursprung von Musik und Dichtung’, RhM 127: 141–58.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1936) Beobachtungen über Vers und Gedankengang bei Lukrez. Berlin.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (ed.) (1966) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Buckley, E. (2006) ‘Ending the Aeneid? Closure and continuation in Maffeo Vegio’s Supplementum’, Vergilius 52: 108–37.Google Scholar

Buffière, F. (1956) Les myths d’Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris.Google Scholar

Buglass, A. K. (2015) Repetition and Internal Allusion in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. Diss. Oxford.Google Scholar

Burke, S. (1992) The Death and Return of the Author (3rd edn. 2008). Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1959) ‘ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΟΝ: Eine semasiologische Studie’, Philologus 103: 167–97.Google Scholar

Bury, R. (ed., trans.) (1952) Plato. Vol. VII: Timaeus, Critias, Cleitophon, Menexenus, Epistles. Loeb Classical Library 234. London and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Butterfield, D. J. (2013) The Early Textual History of Lucretius’ De rerum natura. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Butterfield, D. J. (2014) ‘Lucretius auctus? The question of interpolation in De rerum natura’, in Martínez, J. (ed.) Fakes and Forgers of Classical Literature: Ergo decipiatur! Leiden: 15–42.Google Scholar

Butterfield, D. J. (2018) ‘Lucretius the madman and the gods’, in Bryan, J., Wardy, R. and Warren, J. (eds.) Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge: 222–41.Google Scholar

Cabisius, G. (1985) ‘Social metaphor and the atomic cycle in Lucretius’, CJ 80: 109–20.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (1999) Review of D. Sedley (1998) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. BMCRev 1999.10.29.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (2002) ‘Lucretius and the memes of prehistory’, LICS Discussion Paper 1, available at http://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/95/1/lucretius.pdf (accessed 20 August 2019).Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (2003) Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura 5.772–1104. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (2011) ‘Lucretius’, in Clayman, D. L. (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Classics, online at www.oxfordbibliographies.com.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (2014) ‘Lucretius, Empedocles and Cleanthes’, in Garani, M., Konstan, D. (eds.) The Philosophizing Muse: The Influence of Greek Philosophy on Roman Poetry. Newcastle: 26–60.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (1969) Introduction to Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Canali, L. (1995) Nei pleniluni sereni. Autobiografia immaginaria di Tito Lucrezio Caro. Milan.Google Scholar

Candidus, P. (ed.) (1512) T. Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Florence.Google Scholar

Canevaro, L. G. (2019) ‘Thinking for yourself: Hesiod’s Works and Days and cognitive training’, in Canevaro, L. G. and O’Rourke, D. (eds.) Didactic Poetry of Greece, Rome and Beyond: Knowledge, Power, Tradition. Swansea: 53–74.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1973) ‘Il proemio del “De rerum natura”’, Belfagor 28: 161–7.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1993) Vita di Lucrezio. Palermo.Google Scholar

Cangelosi, A. (2008) ‘The grounding and sharing of symbols’, in Dror, I. E. and Harnad, S. (eds.) Cognition Distributed: How Cognitive Technology Extends Our Minds. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: 83–92.Google Scholar

Càssola, F. (ed., trans.) (1997) Inni Omerici. Milan.Google Scholar

Castner, C. (1988) Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century bc to the Second Century ad. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Chatman, S. (1990) Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. F. (1943) ‘The biographical fashion in literary criticism’, University of California Publications in Classical Philology 12: 279–92.Google Scholar

Clancey, W. J. (2009) ‘Scientific antecedents of situated cognition’, in Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: 11–34.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2003) Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. J. (1998) ‘The extended mind’, Analysis 58: 10–23.Google Scholar

Classen, C. J. (1968) ‘Poetry and rhetoric in Lucretius’, TAPhA 99: 77–118. Repr. in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 331–73.Google Scholar

Classen, C. J. (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. (2016) ‘The Hercules and Cacus episode in Augustan literature: engaging the Homeric Hymn to Hermes in light of Callimachus’ and Apollonius’ reception’, in Faulkner, A., Schwab, A. and Vergados, A. (eds.) The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 55–78.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (1976) ‘The sources of Lucretius’ inspiration’, in Bollack, J. and Laks, A. (eds.) Études sur l’Epicurisme antique, Lille: 205–27. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 18–47.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (1980) ‘An Epicurean interpretation of dreams’, AJPh 101: 342–65.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (1983) Lucretius and Epicurus. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (2000a) ‘Recovering originals: Peri Physeos and De Rerum Natura’, Apeiron 33: 259–71.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (2000b) Platonic Questions: Dialogues with the Silent Philosopher. Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Cochez, J. (ed.) (1954) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Liber Primus. Leuven.Google Scholar

Cole, T. (1998) ‘Venus and Mars (De Rerum Natura 1.31–40)’, in Knox, P. and Foss, C. (eds.) Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Stuttgart: 3–15.Google Scholar

Commager, H. S. Jr (1957) ‘Lucretius’ interpretation of the plague’, HSPh 62: 105–18. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 182–98.Google Scholar

Conington, J. and Nettleship, H. (eds.) (1881) P. Vergili Maronis Opera. The Works of Virgil. 3 vols. (4th edn.). London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1966) ‘Hypsos e diatriba nello stile di Lucrezio’, Maia 18: 538–68.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1985) Memoria dei poeti e sistema letterario: Catullo, Virgilio, Ovidio, Lucano. Turin.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and other Latin Poets. Ed. and trans. Segal, C.. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1990) ‘Introduzione’, in Dionigi, I. (ed.) and Canali, L. (trans.) (1990) Lucrezio, La Natura Delle Cose. 2 vols. (2nd edn. 2000). Milan: 7–47.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1994) Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia. Trans. Most, G. W.. Baltimore, MD and London.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1987) ‘Quotation, interpolation, transposition’, Hermathena 143: 7–18.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (ed.) (1993) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (2001) ‘The proem of Lucretius’, MH 58: 201–11.Google Scholar

Cox, A. (1971) ‘Lucretius and his message: a study in the prologues of the De Rerum Natura’, G&R 18: 1–16.Google Scholar

Craca, C. (1989) Da Epicuro a Lucrezio: Il maestro ed il poeta nei proemi del De rerum natura. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. (1974) Roman Republican Coinage. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Creech, T. (ed.) (1695) Titi Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Oxford.Google Scholar

Culler, J. D. (1986) Ferdinand de Saussure, 2nd edn. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Curd, P. (1998) The Legacy of Parmenides. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Dalzell, A. (1974) ‘Lucretius’ exposition of the doctrine of images’, Hermathena 118: 22–32.Google Scholar

Dalzell, A. (1987) ‘Language and atomic theory in Lucretius’, Hermathena 143: 19–28.Google Scholar

Deichgräber, K. (1940) ‘Similia dissimilia III: Zum 1. Prooemium des Lukrez’, RhM 89: 55–62.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. H. (1964) ‘Distant views: the imagery of Lucretius 2’, CJ 60: 49–55. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 146–57.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. H. (1983) ‘Lucretius and Plato’, in Συζήτησις. Studi sull'epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples: 291–307.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1967) De la grammatologie. Paris.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (1903) Oeuvres de Descartes: Correspondence V: Mai 1647 – Février 1650. Ed. Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (1996) Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Ed. and trans. Cottingham, J.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Descola, P. (2013) Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago, IL and London.Google Scholar

Deufert, M. (1996) Pseudo-Lukrezisches im Lukrez. Berlin.Google Scholar

Deufert, M. (ed.) (2019) Titus Lucretius Carus: De Rerum Natura. Berlin.Google Scholar

Deutsch, R. E. (1939) The Pattern of Sound in Lucretius. Diss. Bryn Mawr.Google Scholar

De Vries, G. (2016) Bruno Latour. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1899) Elementum. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (ed.) (1917) Philodemos Über die Götter: Drittes Buch. Berlin.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (ed.) (1923–4) Titi Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

Dionigi, I. (1988) Lucrezio: Le parole e le cose (3rd edn. 2005). Bologna.Google Scholar

Dionigi, I. (ed.) and Canali, L. (trans.) (1990) Lucrezio, La Natura Delle Cose. 2 vols. (2nd edn. 2000). Milan.Google Scholar

Donald, M. (1991) Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Doody, A. (2010) Pliny’s Encyclopedia: The Reception of the Natural History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (ed.) (1968) Aristophanes. Clouds. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (ed.) (1980) Plato. Symposium. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dror, I. E. and Harnad, S. (2008) ‘Offloading cognition into cognitive technology’, in Dror, I. E. and Harnad, S. (eds.) Cognition Distributed: How Cognitive Technology Extends Our Minds. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: 1–23.Google Scholar

Duff, J. D. (ed.) (1923) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Liber Primus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dykes, A. (2011) Reading Sin in the World: The Hamartigenia of Prudentius and the Vocation of the Responsible Reader. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Earnshaw, K. (2013) ‘(First-) beginnings and (never-) endings in Lucan and Lucretius’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 261–84.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (2009) The Infinity of Lists. Trans. McEwen, A.. London.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore, MD and London.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. (1993) ‘Aeternus lepos: Venus, Lucretius, and the fear of death’, G&R 40: 68–78.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1924) ‘Geleitwort’, in Lukrez, Von der Natur. Trans. Diels, H.. Berlin: via–vib.Google Scholar

Elder, J. P. (1954) ‘Lucretius 1.1–49’, TAPhA 85: 88–120.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1993) ‘Philologia medicans: wie die Epikureer die Texte ihres Meisters lasen’, in Kullmann, W. and Althoff, J. (eds.) Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur. Tübingen: 281–303.Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (ed., trans.) (1920) Lucrèce, De La Nature. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

Ernout, A. and Robin, L. (eds.) (1925–8) Lucrèce, De Rerum Natura: Commentaire Exégétique et Critique. Paris.Google Scholar

Essler, H. (2009) ‘Falsche Götter bei Philodem (Di III Kol. 8,5–Kol. 10,6)’, CronErc 39: 161–205.Google Scholar

Essler, H. (2011) Glückselig und unsterblich: Epikureische Theologie bei Cicero und Philodem (mit einer Edition von PHerc. 152/157, Kol. 8–10). Basel.Google Scholar

Essler, H. (2017) ‘Philodemus of Gadara’, in Clayman, D. (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Classics, online at www.oxfordbibliographies.com.Google Scholar

Everson, S. (1990) ‘Epicurus on the truth of the senses’, in Everson, S. (ed.) Epistemology. Cambridge: 161–83.Google Scholar

Fabbri, R. (1984) ‘La “Vita Borgiana” di Lucrezio nel quadro delle biografie umanistiche’, Lettere Italiane 36: 348–66.Google Scholar

Faber, T. (ed.) (1662) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Saumur.Google Scholar

Fairclough, H. R. and Goold, G. P. (eds., trans.) (1999) Virgil, Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Fanti, G. (2017) ‘The failure of Memmius in Lucretius’ DRN’, Latomus 76: 58–79.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. L. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York, NY and Oxford.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2001) Latin Language and Latin Culture: From Ancient to Modern Times. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2007) ‘Lucretian architecture: the structure and argument of the De rerum natura’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 76–91.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2016) ‘Lucretius and the symptomatology of modernism’, in Lezra, J. and Blake, L. (eds.) (2016) Lucretius and Modernity. Epicurean Encounters across Time and Disciplines. New York, NY: 39–58.Google Scholar

Farrington, B. (1939) Science and Politics in the Ancient World. London.Google Scholar

Faulkner, A. (ed.) (2011a) The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar

Faulkner, A. (2011b) ‘The collection of Homeric Hymns: from the seventh to the third centuries bc’, in The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: 175–205.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1989) Review of Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. JRS 79: 206–7.Google Scholar

Fenves, P. (1986) ‘Marx’s doctoral thesis on two Greek atomists and the post-Kantian interpretations’, JHI 47: 433–52.Google Scholar

Fernyhough, C. (2016) The Voices Within: The History and Science of How We Talk to Ourselves. London.Google Scholar

Finkelberg, M. (2007) ‘More on κλέος ἄφθιτον’, CQ 57: 341–50.Google Scholar

Fiscal, W. (1947) Studien zum Aufbau poetischer Exkurse bei Lukrez. Diss. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Fischer, H. (1924) De capitulis Lucretianis. Diss. Giessen.Google Scholar

Fish, J. (2011) ‘Not all politicians are Sisyphus: what Roman Epicureans were taught about politics’, in Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R. (eds.) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge and New York, NY: 72–104.Google Scholar

Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R. (eds.) (2011) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2016a) Variety: The Life of a Roman Concept. Chicago, IL and London.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2016b) ‘Resonance: the sonic environment of Vergil’s Eclogues’, Dictynna 13, http://journals.openedition.org/dictynna/129 (accessed 2 September 2019).Google Scholar

Flores, E. (ed., trans.) (2002–9) Titus Lucretius Carus: De Rerum Natura. 3 vols. Naples.Google Scholar

Forbiger, A. (ed.) (1828) T. Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Foster, E. (2009) ‘The rhetoric of materials: Thucydides and Lucretius’, AJPh 130: 367–99.Google Scholar

Foster, E. (2011) ‘The political aims of Lucretius’ translation of Thucydides’, in McElduff, S. and Sciarrino, E. (eds.) Complicating the History of Western Translation: The Ancient Mediterrannean in Perspective. Manchester: 88–100.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1983) ‘Lucretius on the clinamen and “free will” (II 251–93)’, in Gigante, M. (ed.) ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ: studi sull’epicureismo greco e latino offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples: 329–52. Repr. in D. Fowler (ed.) (2002) Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford: 407–27.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1989a) ‘Lucretius and politics’, in Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J. (eds.) Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford: 120–50. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 397–431.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1989b) ‘First thoughts on closure’, MD 22: 75–122.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1995) ‘From epos to cosmos: Lucretius, Ovid, and the poetics of segmentation’, in Innes, D. C., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.) Ethics and Rhetoric: Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford: 3–18.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1996) ‘The feminine principal: gender in the De rerum natura’, in Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M. (eds.) Epicureismo greco e romano: Atti del congresso internazionale, Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1993. 3 vols. Naples: 813–22. Repr. in D. Fowler (ed.) (2002) Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De rerum natura 2.1–332. Oxford: 444–52.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1997a) ‘On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and classical studies’, MD 39: 13–34.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1997b) ‘Second thoughts on closure’, in Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.) Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ: 3–22.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (2000a) Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (2000b) ‘Philosophy and literature in Lucretian intertextuality’, in Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford: 138–55.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (2000c) ‘The didactic plot’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.) Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA: 205–19.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (ed.) (2002) Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De rerum natura 2.1–332. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fowler, P. G. (1997) ‘Lucretian conclusions’, in Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.) Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ: 112–38. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 199–233.Google Scholar

Fratantuono, L. (2015) A Reading of Lucretius’ De rerum natura. Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, NY and London.Google Scholar

Friedländer, P. (1932) ‘Retractationes II’, Hermes 67: 43–6.Google Scholar

Friedländer, P. (1939) ‘The Epicurean theology in Lucretius’ first proœmium (Lucr. I. 44–49)’, TAPhA 70: 368–79.Google Scholar

Friedländer, P. (1941) ‘Patterns of sound and atomistic theory in Lucretius’, AJPh 62: 16–34. Repr. in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 291–307; M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 351–70.Google Scholar

Frischer, B. (1982) The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Fröhder, D. (1994) Die dichterische Form der Homerischen Hymnen: Untersucht am Typus der mittelgroßen Preislieder. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Furley, D. (1966) ‘Lucretius and the Stoics’, BICS 13: 13–33. Repr. in Furley, D. (ed.) (1989) Cosmic Problems. Cambridge: 183–205; C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 75–95.Google Scholar

Furley, D. (1967) Two Studies in the Greek Atomists. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Furley, D. (1970) ‘Variations on themes from Empedocles in Lucretius’ proem’, BICS 17: 55–64.Google Scholar

Furley, D. (1981) ‘The Greek theory of the infinite universe’, JHI 42: 571–85.Google Scholar

Gabaude, J.-M. (1970) Le jeune Marx et le matérialisme antique. Toulouse.Google Scholar

Gabriel, M. (2015) Why the World Does Not Exist. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (1994) Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2001a) Lucretius and the Didactic Epic. London.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2001b) ‘Etymological wordplay and poetic succession in Lucretius’, CPh 96: 168–72.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2004) ‘The story of us: a narratological analysis of Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura’, in Gale, M. R. (ed.) Latin Epic and Didactic Poetry: Genre, Tradition and Individuality. Swansea: 49–71.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2005) ‘Avia Pieridum loca: tradition and innovation in Lucretius’, in Horster, M. and Reitz, Ch. (eds.) Wissensvermittlung in dichterischer Gestalt. Stuttgart: 175–91.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (ed.) (2007a) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2007b) ‘Lucretius and previous poetic traditions’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 59–75.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2018) ‘Contemplating violence: Lucretius’ De rerum natura’, in Gale, M. R. and Scourfield, J. H. D. (eds.) Texts and Violence in the Roman World. Cambridge: 63–86.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2019) ‘Name puns and acrostics in didactic poetry: reading the universe’, in Canevaro, L. G. and O’Rourke, D. (eds.) Didactic Poetry of Greece, Rome and Beyond: Knowledge, Power, Tradition. Swansea: 123–50.Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2009) ‘Philosophical antecedents of situated cognition’, in Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: 35–51.Google Scholar

Gandon, F. (2002) De dangereux édifices. Saussure lecteur de Lucrèce. Les cahiers d’anagrammes consacrés au De rerum natura. Leuven and Paris.Google Scholar

Gandon, F. (2006) Le nom de l’absent. Épistémologie de la science saussurienne des signes. Limoges.Google Scholar

Garani, M. (2007) Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and Analogy in Lucretius. New York, NY and London.Google Scholar

Garber, D. (1992) Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago, IL and London.Google Scholar

Garcia, L. F. (2013) Homeric Durability: Telling Time in the Iliad. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

García Calvo, A. (ed., trans.) (1997) Lucrecio, De Rerum Natura (De la realidad). Zamora.Google Scholar

Garratt, P. (ed.) (2016) The Cognitive Humanities: Embodied Mind in Literature and Culture. London.Google Scholar

Gasché, R. (2007) The Honor of Thinking: Critique, Theory, Philosophy. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Gee, E. (2000) Ovid, Aratus and Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gee, E. (2001) ‘Cicero’s astronomy’, CQ 51: 520–36.Google Scholar

Gee, E. (2013) Aratus and the Astronomical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gee, E. (2016) ‘Dogs, snakes and heroes: hybridism and polemic in Lucretius’ De rerum natura’, in Oakley, S. and Hunter, R. L. (eds.) Latin Literature and its Transmission: Papers in Honour of Michael Reeve. Cambridge: 108–41.Google Scholar

Gellar, T. (2012) Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura and Satire. Diss. North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1983) Narrative Discourse Revisited. Trans. J. E. Lewin. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1997) Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Trans. Newman, C. and Doubinsky, C.. Lincoln, NE and London.Google Scholar

Germany, R. (2005) ‘The figure of Echo in the Homeric Hymn to Pan’, AJPh 126: 187–208.Google Scholar

Giancotti, F. (1978) Il preludio di Lucrezio e altri scritti lucreziani ed epicurei. Messina and Florence.Google Scholar

Giancotti, F. (1980) ‘Il preludio di Lucrezio, il trasposizionismo e Lattanzio’, Orpheus 1: 221–50.Google Scholar

Giancotti, F. (ed., trans.) (1994) Tito Lucrezio Caro: La Natura. Introduzione, testo criticamente riveduto, traduzione e commento. Milan.Google Scholar

Giannantoni, G. (1989) ‘L’infinito nella fisica epicurea’, in Ceresa-Gastaldo, A. (ed.) L’infinito dei greci e dei romani. Genoa: 9–26.Google Scholar

Giannantoni, G. (1996) ‘Epicuro e l’ateismo antico’, in Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M. (eds.) Epicureismo greco e romano: Atti del congresso internazionale, Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1993. 3 vols. Naples: 21–63.Google Scholar

Giesecke, A. L. (2000) Atoms, Ataraxy, and Allusion: Cross-Generic Imitation of the De Rerum Natura in Early Augustan Poetry. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Gifanius, O. (1595) Titi Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex (2nd edn.; 1st edn. Antwerp, 1565). Leiden.Google Scholar

Gigandet, A. (1998) Fama Deum. Lucrèce et les raisons du mythe. Paris.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1975) ‘“Philosophia Medicans” in Filodemo’, CronErc 5: 53–61.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1983a) Ricerche filodemee. Naples.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (ed.) (1983b) ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ: studi sull’epicureismo greco e latino offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1995) Philodemus in Italy: The Books from Herculaneum. Trans. Obbink, D.. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Gigon, O. (ed.) (1971) T. Lucretius Carus: De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Zurich.Google Scholar

Gigon, O. (1978) ‘Lukrez und Ennius’, in Gigon, O. (ed.) Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur L’Antiquité Classique 24. Geneva: 167–91.Google Scholar

Gill, C. J. (2006) The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) (2007) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gillespie, S. and Mackenzie, D. (2007) ‘Lucretius and the moderns’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 306–24.Google Scholar

Gillis, D. J. (1967) ‘Pastoral poetry in Lucretius’, Latomus 26: 339–62.Google Scholar

Gimpel, P. (1981) ‘De rerum natura: prooemium restitutum’, RCCM 31: 3–41.Google Scholar

Giuffrida, P. (1940–50) L’epicureismo nella letteratura latina nel 1 sec. av. Cristo. 2 vols. Turin.Google Scholar

Giussani, C. (1896) Studi Lucreziani. Turin.Google Scholar

Giussani, C. (ed.) (1896–8) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. 4 vols. Turin.Google Scholar

Glidden, D. K. (1985) ‘Epicurean prolepsis’, OSAPh 3: 175–217.Google Scholar

Goldberg, J. (2009) The Seeds of Things: Theorizing Sexuality and Materiality in Renaissance Representations. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, N. (2019) Afterlives of the Roman Poets: Biofiction and the Reception of Latin Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goold, G. (1970) ‘Servius and the Helen Episode’, HSPh 74: 101–68.Google Scholar

Gordon, C. A. (1962) A Bibliography of Lucretius. London.Google Scholar

Gordon, P. (2002) ‘Some unseen monster: rereading Lucretius on sex’, in Fredrick, D. (ed.) The Roman Gaze. Vision, Power and the Body. Baltimore, MD: 86–109.Google Scholar

Gordon, P. (2012) The Invention and Gendering of Epicurus. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Gottschalk, H. B. (1975) ‘Lucretius 1.983’, CPh 70: 42–4.Google Scholar

Gottschalk, H. B. (1996) ‘Philosophical innovations in Lucretius?’, in Algra, K. A., van der Horst, P. W. and Runia, D. T. (eds.) Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on His Sixtieth Birthday. Leiden: 231–40.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (ed.) (2012) Horace: Satires Book 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. (2005) Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Greenberg, N. A. (1955) The Poetic Theory of Philodemus. Diss. Harvard.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S. (2011) The Swerve: How the Renaissance Began. London.Google Scholar

Grewing, F., Acosta-Hughes, B. and Kirichenko, A. (eds.) (2013) The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1957) ‘Lucrèce et l’hymne à Venus’, REL 35: 184–95.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1978) ‘Le poème de Lucrèce en son temps’, in Gigon, O. (ed.) Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur L’Antiquité Classique 24. Geneva: 233–70.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1969) ‘The consular elections for 53 bc’, in Brabauw, J. (ed.) Hommages à Marcel Renard. Collection Latomus 101. 2 vols. Brussels: 2.311–21.Google Scholar

Gumbrecht, H. U. (2004) Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (2002) Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Hadzsits, G. D. (1963) Lucretius and his Influence. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Hahmann, A. (2015) ‘Epikur über den Gegenstand der Wahrnehmung’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 97: 271–307.Google Scholar

Hammerstaedt, J. (2003) ‘Une ancienne discussion sur les critères de l’excellence du poème (éd. Philodème, Poèmes V, PHerc. 1425 col. XXV sq. Réexamen de Mangoni)’, in Monet, A. (ed.) Le Jardin romain: Épicurisme et poésie à Rome. Mélanges offerts à Mayotte Bollack. Lille: 303–17.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2013) ‘Lucretius, Epicurus, and the logic of multiple explanations’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) (2013) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 69–98.Google Scholar

Hanson, J. A. (1959) Roman Theater-Temples. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1985) ‘Imago mundi: cosmological and ideological aspects of the shield of Aeneas’, JHS 105: 11–31.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1988) ‘Lucretius and the delusions of Narcissus’, MD 20: 71–89.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (ed.) (1994) Virgil: Aeneid Book IX. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1998) Virgil. Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics 28. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2002) Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2009) Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Harnad, S. (ed.) (1987) Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition. Cambridge and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Harnad, S. (1990) ‘The symbol grounding problem’, Physica D 42: 335–46.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2016) ‘The Homeric Hymns and Horatian lyric’, in Faulkner, A., Schwab, A. and Vergados, A. (eds.) The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 79–94.Google Scholar

Haskell, Y. (2007) ‘Religion and enlightenment in the neo-Latin reception of Lucretius’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 185–201.Google Scholar

Haugeland, J. (1998) Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Haugeland, J. (2002) ‘Andy Clark on cognition and representation’, in Caplin, H. (ed.) Philosophy of Mental Representation. Oxford and New York, NY: 24–36.Google Scholar

Havercamp, S. (ed.) (1725) Titi Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura. 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (2002) Interpreting Classical Texts. London.Google Scholar

Heerink, M. (2015) Echoing Hylas: A Study in Hellenistic and Roman Metapoetics. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1833) Werke. Vol. 14 (= Michelet, K. L. (ed.) Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Vol. 2. Berlin.)Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1995) Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Trans. E. S. Haldane and F. H. Simson (based on Hegel’s Geschichte der Philosophie 1840). Lincoln, NE and London.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1996) Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie Part III: Griechische Philosophie II. Plato bis Proklos, eds. Garniron, P. and Jaeschke, W.. Hamburg. Trans. Brown, R. F. and Stewart, J. M. (2006) Lectures on the History of Philosophy 1825–6. Vol. II. Oxford.Google Scholar

Heinze, R. (ed.) (1897) T. Lucretius Carus De Rerum Natura, Buch III. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2011) ‘The nature of man: Pliny, Historia Naturalis as cosmogram’, MD 66: 139–72.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2016) ‘Cicero’s letters to Cicero, ad QFr: big brothers keepers’, Arethusa 49.3: 439–61.Google Scholar

Henry, W. B. (ed., trans.) (2009) Philodemus, On Death. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Hillmann, G. (1966) Marx und Hegel. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1987) The Metamorphosis of Persephone. Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. B. and Szantyr, A. (1965) Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (2002) ‘Horror vacui in Lucretian biography’, LICS 1.1: 1–23.Google Scholar

Hollander, J. (1981) The Figure of Echo. A Mode of Allusion in Milton and After. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Hollis, A. S. (ed., trans.) (2007) Fragments of Roman Poetry, c. 60 bc–ad 20. Oxford.Google Scholar

Holmes, B. (2012) ‘Deleuze, Lucretius, and the simulacrum of naturalism’, in Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H. (eds.) Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism. New York, NY and Oxford: 316–42.Google Scholar

Holmes, B. (2016) ‘Michel Serres’s non-modern Lucretius: manifold reason and the temporality of reception’, in Lezra, J. and Blake, L. (eds.) Lucretius and Modernity. Epicurean Encounters across Time and Disciplines. New York, NY: 21–37.Google Scholar

Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H. (eds.) (2012) Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism. New York, NY and Oxford.Google Scholar

Holzberg, N. (1998) ‘Ter quinque volumina as carmen perpetuum: the division into books in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, MD 40: 77–98.Google Scholar

Hopkins, D. (2007) ‘The English voices of Lucretius from Lucy Hutchinson to John Mason good’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 254–73.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1995) ‘Written in the stars: poetry and philosophy in Aratus’ Phaenomena’, Arachnion 2: 1–34.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995a) Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995b) ‘How a cockpit remembers its speed’, Cognitive Science 19: 265–88.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2001) ‘The date of De Rerum Natura’, CQ 51: 150–62.Google Scholar

Iser, W. (1978) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD and London.Google Scholar

James, A. W. (1972) ‘The Zeus Hymns of Aratus and Cleanthes’, Antichthon 6: 28–38.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (1982) Homer, Hesiod, and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Epic Diction. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (ed., trans.) (2000) Philodemus: On Poems Book 1, Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (ed., trans.) (2011) Philodemus: On Poems Books 3–4 with the Fragments of Aristotle, On Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jebb, R. C. (1868) ‘On Mr. Tennyson’s “Lucretius”’, Macmillan’s Magazine, June 1868, 28.104: 97–103.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. and Wilson, C. (2007) ‘Lucretius and the history of science’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 131–48.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. J. (2017) The Deleuze–Lucretius Encounter. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (2000) Lucretius and the Modern World. London.Google Scholar

Jones, R. M. (1926) ‘Posidonius and the flight of the mind through the universe’, CPh 21.2: 97–113.Google Scholar

Jope, J. (1983) ‘Lucretius’ psychoanalytic insight: his notion of unconscious motivation’, Phoenix 37: 224–38.Google Scholar

Joseph, J. E. (2012) Saussure. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (ed.) (1995) Suetonius, De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Katz, J. T. (2013) ‘Saussure’s anaphonie: sounds asunder’, in Butler, S. and Purves, A. (eds.) Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses. Durham: 167–84.Google Scholar

Katz, J. T. (2015) ‘Saussure at play and his structuralist and post-structuralist interpreters’, Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 68: 113–32.Google Scholar

Keaveney, A. (2005) Sulla: The Last Republican. 2nd edn. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Keen, R. (1981) ‘Lexical note to the Epicurean doctrine of perception’, Apeiron 15: 59–69.Google Scholar

Keen, R. (1985) ‘Lucretius and his reader’, Apeiron 19: 1–10.Google Scholar

Kegel-Brinkgreve, E. (1990) The Echoing Woods. Bucolic and Pastoral from Theocritus to Wordsworth. Leiden.Google Scholar

Keith, A. (2016) ‘The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite in Ovid and Augustan literature’, in Faulkner, A., Schwab, A. and Vergados, A. (eds.) The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 109–25.Google Scholar

Kelly, G. P. (2006) A History of Exile in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kelsey, F. W. (ed.) (1884) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Boston, MA and Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (2000) ‘Making a text of the universe: perspectives on discursive order in the De Rerum Natura of Lucretius’, in Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds.) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Oxford: 205–25. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 376–96 (with Addendum [2005]).Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (2002) Rethinking Reality: Lucretius and the Textualization of Nature. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (2008) ‘Atoms, individuals, and myths’, in Zajko, V. and Leonard, M. (eds.) Laughing with Medusa: Classical Myth and Psychoanalysis. Oxford: 233–52.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (2013) ‘The political epistemology of infinity’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) (2013) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 51–67.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (2015) ‘Lucretius’, in Pritchard, D. (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Classics, online at www.oxfordbibliographies.com.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (2020) ‘Metalepsis and metaphysics’, in Matzner, S. and Trimble, G. (eds.) Metalepsis: Ancient Texts, New Perspectives. Oxford: 223–45.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1970) ‘Doctus Lucretius’, Mnemosyne 23: 366–92. Repr. with addenda in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 237–65; M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 300–27.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (ed.) (2014) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura Book III. 2nd edn. (1st edn. 1984). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Keyser, C. J. (1919) ‘The rôle of the concept of infinity in the work of Lucretius’, Classical Weekly 12.13: 102–4.Google Scholar

Kidd, D. (ed., trans.) (1997) Aratus: Phaenomena. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, R. S. (1996) ‘Amicus medicus: medicine and Epicurean therapy in De Rerum Natura’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 41: 69–100.Google Scholar

Kindt, T. and Mueller, H.-H. (2008) The Implied Author: Concept and Controversy. Hamburg.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M. (1983) The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd edn. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kirsh, D. (2006) ‘Distributed cognition: a methodological note’, Pragmatics & Cognition 14: 249–62.Google Scholar

Klauser, T. (1941–2000) Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Kleve, K. (1966) ‘Lukrez und Venus’, SO 41: 86–97.Google Scholar

Kleve, K. (1979a) ‘The Epicurean isonomia and its sceptical refutation’, SO 54: 27–35.Google Scholar

Kleve, K. (1979b) ‘What kind of work did Lucretius write?’, SO 54: 81–5.Google Scholar

Knox, T. M. (trans.) (1975) Hegel. Aesthetics. Vols. I and II. Oxford.Google Scholar

Koenen, M. H. (1997) ‘Lucretius’ olfactory theory in De rerum natura IV’, in Algra, K., Koenen, M. and Schrijvers, P. (eds.) Lucretius and his Intellectual Background. Amsterdam: 163–77.Google Scholar

Koenen, M. H. (2004) ‘Loca loquuntur. Lucretius’ explanation of the echo and other acoustic phenomena in DRN 4.563–614’, Mnemosyne 57: 698–724.Google Scholar

Kolakowski, L. (1978) Main Currents of Marxism. Vol. I. Oxford.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1979) ‘Problems in Epicurean physics’, Isis 70: 394–418.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1988) ‘Lucretius on poetry: III.1–13’, ColbyQ 24: 65–70.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2004) ‘“The birth of the reader”: Plutarch as a literary critic’, Scholia 13: 3–27.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2006) ‘The active reader in classical antiquity’, Argos 30: 7–18.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2008) A Life Worthy of the Gods: The Materialist Psychology of Epicurus. Las Vegas, NV, Zurich and Athens.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2009) ‘De Sócrates a Descartes: hablar, leer y la naturaleza de la Filosofía’, Nova Tellus 27: 1–20.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2011) ‘Epicurus on the gods’, in Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R. (eds.) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge and New York, NY: 53–71.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2013) ‘Lucretius and the Epicurean attitude towards grief’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 193–210.Google Scholar

Konstan, D., Clay, D., Glad, C. E., Thom, J. C. and Ware, J. (eds.) (1998) Philodemus: On Frank Criticism. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Krämer, S. (2016) ‘Is there a diagrammatical impulse in Plato? “Quasi-diagrammatical-scenes” in Plato’s philosophy’, in Krämer, S. and Ljungberg, C. (eds.) Thinking with Diagrams: The Semiotic Basis of Human Cognition. Berlin, Boston, MA, Beijing: 163–77.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. B. (2013) ‘Caesar, Lucretius and the dates of De rerum natura and the Commentarii’, CQ 63: 772–9.Google Scholar

Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. (1955) Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre. 2nd edn. Leverkusen.Google Scholar

Kuttner, A. L. (1999) ‘Culture and history at Pompey’s museum’, TAPhA 129: 343–73.Google Scholar

Kyriakidis, S. (2006) ‘Lucretius’ DRN 1.926–50 and the proem to Book 4’, CQ 56: 606–10.Google Scholar

Kyriakidis, S. (2007) Catalogues of Proper Names in Latin Epic Poetry: Lucretius, Virgil, Ovid. Newcastle.Google Scholar

Lacan, J. (1970) ‘Radiophonie’, Scilicet 2/3: 55–99.Google Scholar

Lachmann, K. (ed.) (1850) T. Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura Libri VI. Berlin. Index by Harder, F. (1882). Berlin.Google Scholar

Lambinus, D. (ed.) (1570) T. Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura Libri VI (3rd edn.; 1st edn. 1563–4). Paris.Google Scholar

Lange, F. A. (1866) Geschichte des Materialismus. Iserlohn.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. Porter, C.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1995) ‘Cogito ergo sumus! Or psychology swept inside out by the fresh air of the upper deck: review of Hutchins 1995’, Mind, Culture, and Activity 3: 54–63.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2004) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2010) ‘Coming out as a philosopher’, Social Studies of Science 40: 599–608.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2013) An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2016) ‘Let’s touch base!’, in Latour, B. (ed.) Reset Modernity! Cambridge, MA and London: 11–23.Google Scholar

Lear, J. (1979) ‘Aristotelian infinity’, PAS 80: 187–210.Google Scholar

Lee, M. (2011) ‘The distinction between primary and secondary qualities in ancient Greek philosophy’, in Nolan, L. (ed.) Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. Oxford: 15–40.Google Scholar

Lehoux, D. (2012) What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Lehoux, D. (2013) ‘Seeing and unseeing, seen and unseen’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 131–51.Google Scholar

Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) (2013) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford.Google Scholar

Leonard, W. E. and Smith, S. B. (eds.) (1942) De Rerum Natura: The Latin Text of Lucretius. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Leone, G. (2002a) ‘Epicuro, Della natura, libro XXXIV (PHerc. 1431)’, CronErc 32: 7–135.Google Scholar

Leone, G. (2002b) ‘Nuove conferme dall’opera Della natura di Epicuro alla valenza tecnica del gruppo semantico ἕτοιμος/ἑτοίμως nella dottrina epicurea dei pori’, SIFC 20: 104–18.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1950) ‘Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss’, in Mauss, M., Sociologie et anthropologie. Paris: IX–LII.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1972) ‘Religion, langue et histoire: à propos d’un texte inédit de Ferdinand de Saussure’, in Mélanges en l’honneur de Fernand Braudel 2. Toulouse: 325–33.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1987) Introduction to the Work of Marcel Mauss. Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Lewis, A. M. (1992) ‘The popularity of the Phaenomena of Aratus’, in Deroux, C. (ed.) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 6. Brussels.Google Scholar

Lezra, J. (2016) ‘On the nature of Marx’s things’, in Lezra, J. and Blake, L. (eds.) Lucretius and Modernity. Epicurean Encounters across Time and Disciplines. New York, NY: 125–43.Google Scholar

Lezra, J. and Blake, L. (eds.) (2016) Lucretius and Modernity. Epicurean Encounters across Time and Disciplines. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. (1999) The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (2015) Analogical Investigations: Historical and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human Reasoning. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, J. (1984) Responsive Readings. Versions of Echo in Pastoral, Epic, and Jonsonian Masque. New Haven, CT and London.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1977) ‘Chance and natural law in Epicureanism’, Phronesis 22: 63–88. Repr. in A. A. Long (ed.) (2006) From Epicurus to Epictetus. Oxford: 157–77.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1996) ‘Dialectic and the Stoic sage’, in Stoic Studies. Cambridge and New York, NY: 85–106.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (2009) ‘How does Socrates’ divine sign communicate with him?’, in Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R. (eds.) A Companion to Socrates. Chichester: 63–74.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Longo Auricchio, F. (ed.) (1988) Ermarco, Frammenti. Naples.Google Scholar

Lotringer, S. (1973) ‘The game of the name’, Diacritics 3.2: 2–9.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (1995) Review of Schiesaro, A., Mitsis, P. and Clay, J. S. (1993) Mega nepios: il destinatario nell’epos didascalio. BMCRev 95.06.13.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2009) Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, M. (2014) ‘Hunting’, in Campbell, G. L. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life. Oxford and New York, NY: 203–15.Google Scholar

Mangoni, C. (ed.) (1993) Filodemo, La Poesia V, La scuola di Epicuro 14. Naples.Google Scholar

Maniglier, P. (2014) ‘A metaphysical turn? Bruno Latour’s An Inquiry into Modes of Existence’, Radical Philosophy 187: 37–44.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1993) ‘Aspects of Epicurean theology’, Mnemosyne 46: 172–210.Google Scholar

Marchetta, A. (1989) I versi teologici del De rerum natura di Lucrezio: I 44–49. L’Aquila and Rome.Google Scholar

Martin, J. (ed.) (1934) De rerum natura libri sex (1st edn.; 2nd edn. 1953; 3rd edn. 1957; 4th edn. 1963). Leipzig.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (2005) Latin Poetry and the Judgement of Taste. An Essay in Aesthetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

McCarthy, G. E. (1990) Marx and the Ancients. Classical Ethics, Social Justice and Nineteenth-Century Political Economy. Savage, MD.Google Scholar

McCarthy-Jones, S. (2012) Hearing Voices: The Histories, Causes and Meanings of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. (ed., trans.) (1973) Plato: Theaetetus. Oxford.Google Scholar

McIvor, M. (2008) ‘The young Marx and German idealism: revisiting the doctoral dissertation’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 46: 395–415.Google Scholar

McKeown, J. C. (ed.) (1989) Ovid, Amores. Vol. II: A Commentary on Book One. Liverpool.Google Scholar

McLellan, D. (1969) The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx. London.Google Scholar

McLeod, M. (1963) ‘Lucretius’ carmen dignum’, CJ 58: 145–56.Google Scholar

McOsker, M. (2014) ‘A new edition of PHerc. 188 (Demetrius Laco, On Poems I)’, CronErc 44: 19–48.Google Scholar

McOsker, M. (2015) On the Good Poem According to Philodemus. Diss. Michigan.Google Scholar

Mehl, D. (1999) ‘The intricate translation of the Epicurean doctrine of ψυχή in Book 3 of Lucretius’, Philologus 143: 272–87.Google Scholar

Merrill, W. A. (ed.) (1907) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Merrill, W. A. (ed.) (1917) Lucreti De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Miller, F. (1909) ‘Evidences of incompleteness in the Aeneid of Vergil’, CJ 4: 341–55.Google Scholar

Miller, J. (2016) ‘Ovid’s Bacchic helmsman and Homeric Hymn 7’, in Faulkner, A., Schwab, A. and Vergados, A. (eds.) The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 95–108.Google Scholar

Minadeo, R. (1968) ‘Three textual problems in Lucretius’, CJ 63: 241–6.Google Scholar

Minadeo, R. (1969) The Lyre of Science: Form and Meaning in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. Detroit, MI.Google Scholar

Minyard, J. D. (1985) Lucretius and the Late Republic: An Essay in Roman Intellectual History. Leiden.Google Scholar

Mitsis, P. (1993) ‘Committing philosophy on the reader: didactic coercion and reader autonomy in De Rerum Natura’, in Schiesaro, A., Mitsis, P. and Clay, J. S. (eds.) Mega nepios: il destinatario nell’epos didascalico. Pisa: 111–28.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1941) Review of Farrington, B. (1939) Science and Politics in the Ancient World. JRS 31: 149–57.Google Scholar

Montag, W. (2016) ‘From clinamen to conatus: Deleuze, Lucretius, Spinoza’, in Lezra, J. and Blake, L. (eds.) Lucretius and Modernity. Epicurean Encounters across Time and Disciplines. New York, NY: 163–72.Google Scholar

Montarese, F. (2012) Lucretius and his Sources: A Study of Lucretius De rerum natura 1.635–920. Berlin.Google Scholar

Moore, A. W. (ed.) (1993) Infinity. Dartmouth, NH.Google Scholar

Moore, A. W. (2001) The Infinite. 2nd edn. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Morenval, A. (2017) Le Tout et l’Infini dans le De rerum natura de Lucrèce. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Morgan, Ll. and Taylor, B. (2017) ‘Memmius the Epicurean’, CQ 67: 528–41.Google Scholar

Morrison, A. D. (2013) ‘Nil igitur mors est ad nos? Iphianassa, the Athenian Plague, and Epicurean Views of Death’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 211–32.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (2012) ‘The sublime, today?’, in Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H. (eds.) Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism. New York, NY and Oxford: 239–66.Google Scholar

Müller, G. (1959) Die Darstellung der Kinetik bei Lukrez. Berlin.Google Scholar

Müller, G. (1978) ‘Die Finalia der sechs Bücher des Lucrez’, in Gigon, O. (ed.) Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur L’Antiquité Classique 24. Geneva: 197–221. Trans. Reitz, B. in Gale, M. R. (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 234–54: ‘The conclusions of the six books of Lucretius’.Google Scholar

Müller, K. (ed.) (1975) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura. Zurich.Google Scholar

Munro, H. A. J. (ed.) (1886) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. 2 vols. (4th edn.; 1st edn. 1864). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Murray, O. (1965) ‘Philodemus on the Good King according to Homer’, JRS 55: 161–82.Google Scholar

Mussehl, J. (1912) De Lucretiani Libri Primi Condicione ac Retractatione. Diss. Greifswald.Google Scholar

Nethercut, J. S. (2014) ‘Ennius and the revaluation of traditional historiography in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura’, in Ker, J. and Pieper, C. (eds.) Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World. Leiden and Boston, MA: 435–61.Google Scholar

Nethercut, J. S. (2016) ‘Hercules and Apollo in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Faulkner, A., Schwab, A. and Vergados, A. (eds.) The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 127–41.Google Scholar

Nethercut, J. S. (2018) ‘The Alexandrian footnote in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura’, Mnemosyne 71: 75–99.Google Scholar

Nethercut, J. S. (2019) ‘Provisional argumentation and Lucretius’ honeyed cup’, CQ 68.2: 523–33.Google Scholar

Newlands, C. (ed.) (2011) Statius, Silvae Book II. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Newman, J. H. (1875) A Letter Addressed to His Grace the Duke of Norfolk on Occasion of Mr. Gladstone's Recent Expostulation. New York, NY.Google Scholar

Nichols, J. (1976) Epicurean Political Philosophy: The De Rerum Natura of Lucretius. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Niehues-Pröbsting, H. (2015) ‘Mythos des Protagoras, Thales-Anekdote, Höhlengleichnis. Blumenbergs Platonlektüre, kritisch betrachtet’, in Möller, M. (ed.) Prometheus gibt nicht auf: Antike Welt und modernes Leben in Hans Blumenbergs Philosophie. Paderborn: 25–46.Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. W. (1995) Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. W. (2004) Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in its Cultural Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. (ed.) (1961) Cicero, In L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M and Hubbard, M. (eds.) (1978) A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book II. Oxford.Google Scholar

Noller, E. M. (2015) ‘Re et sonitu distare. Überlegungen zu Ordnung und Bedeutung in Lukrez, De Rerum Natura I, 814–829’, in Haß, C. D. and Noller, E. M. (eds.) Was bedeutet Ordnung–was ordnet Bedeutung? Berlin: 137–72.Google Scholar

Norbrook, D. (2015) ‘Introduction’, in Norbrook, D., Harrison, S. J. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) Lucretius and the Early Modern. Oxford: 1–27.Google Scholar

Norbrook, D., Harrison, S. J. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) (2015) Lucretius and the Early Modern. Oxford.Google Scholar

Norman, D. A. (1991) ‘Cognitive artifacts’, in Carroll, J. M. (ed.) Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human–Computer Interface. Cambridge and New York, NY: 17–38.Google Scholar

Nugent, S. G. (1994) ‘Mater matters: the female in Lucretius’ De rerum natura’, ColbyQ 30: 179–205.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (1986) ‘Therapeutic arguments: Epicurus and Aristotle’, in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) The Norms of Nature. Cambridge: 31–74.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.) (1992) Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1989) ‘The atheism of Epicurus’, GRBS 30: 187–223.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (ed.) (1995a) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1995b) ‘How to read poetry about gods’, in Obbink, D. (ed.) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford and New York, NY: 189–209.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (ed.) (1996) Philodemus, On Piety, Part I. Oxford.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (2002) ‘“All gods are true” in Epicurus’, in Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.) Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath. Leiden: 183–221.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. (1998) ‘Venus or the Muse as “Ally” (Lucr. 1.24, Simon. frag. Eleg. 11.20-22 W)’, CPh 93.1: 69–74.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. (2007) Inconsistency in Roman Epic. Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. Cambridge.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, T. (1997) ‘The ontological status of sensible qualities for Democritus and Epicurus’, AncPhil 17: 119–134.Google Scholar