Abarca-Arenas, L.G. & Ulanowicz, R.E. (2002). The effects of taxonomic aggregation on network analysis. Ecological Modelling, 149, 285–296.Google Scholar

Abdi, R.H. (2007). RV coefficient and congruence coefficient. In Salkind, N. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, pp. 849–853. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Abrams, P.A., Menge, B.A., Mittelbach, G.G., Spiller, D.A. & Yodzis, P. (1996). The role of indirect effects in food webs. In Polis, G. & Winemuller, K.O. (eds), Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics, pp. 371–395. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Agresti, S., De Meo, P., Ferrara, E., Piccolo, S. & Provetti, A. (2015). Trust networks: Topology, dynamics, and measurements. IEEE Internet Computing, 19, 26–35.Google Scholar

Ahmed, N.K., Neville, J. & Kompella, R. (2014). Network sampling: From static to streaming graphs. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 8, 1–56.Google Scholar

Ahmed, N., Neville, J., Rossi, R.A. & Duffield, N. (2015). Efficient graphlet counting for large networks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 1–10.Google Scholar

Ahn, Y.-Y., Bagrow, J.P. & Lehman, S. (2010). Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature, 466, 761–764.Google Scholar

Ai, D., Gravel, D., Chu, C. & Wang, G. (2013). Spatial structures of the environment and of dispersal impact species distribution in competitive metacommunities. PLoS ONE, 8, e68927.Google Scholar

Airola, A., Pyysalo, S., Björne, J., Pahikkala, T., Ginter, F. & Salakoski, T. (2008). All-paths graph kernel for protein-protein interaction extraction with evaluation of cross-corpus learning. BioMed Central Bioinformatics, 9 (Suppl. 11): S2; doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-S11-S2.Google Scholar

Albert, E.M., Fortuna, M.A., Godoy, J.A. & Bascompte, J. (2013). Assessing the robustness of networks of spatial genetic variations. Ecology Letters, 16, 86–93.Google Scholar

Albert, R. & Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47–97.Google Scholar

Alcántara, J.M. & Rey, P.J. (2012). Linking topological structure and dynamics in ecological networks. The American Naturalist, 180, 186–199.Google Scholar

Alcántara, J.M. & Rey, P.J. (2014). Community dynamics: lessons from a skeleton. In Benítez, M., Miramontes, O. & Valiente-Banuet, A. (eds), Frontiers in Ecology, Evolution and Complexity, pp. 1–8 Mexico City: CopIt-arXives.Google Scholar

Alcántara, J.M., Rey, P.J. & Manzaneda, A.J. (2015). A model of plant community dynamics based on replacement networks. Journal of Vegetation Science, 26, 524–537.Google Scholar

Alenazi, M.J.F. & Sterbenz, J.P.G. (2015). Comprehensive comparison and accuracy of graph metrics in predicting network resilience. Paper presented at the International Conference of Reliable Communication Networks, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar

Alexandris, J. & Karagiorgos, G. (2014). Enhanced random walk with choice: an empirical study. International Journal on Applications of Graph Theory in Wireless ad hoc Networks and Sensor Networks, 6, doi:10.5121/jgraphoc.2014.6101.Google Scholar

Allesina, S., Bodini, A. & Bondavalli, C. (2005). Ecological subsystems via graph theory: the role of strongly connected components. Oikos, 110, 164–176.Google Scholar

Allesina, S. & Levine, J.M. (2011). A competitive network theory of species diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 108, 5638–5642. doi:10.1073/pnas.101442818.Google Scholar

Almeida-Neto, M., Guimaräes, P.R. & Lewinsohn, T.M. (2007). On nestedness analysis: rethinking matrix temperature and anti-nestedness. Oikos, 116, 716–722.Google Scholar

Almeida-Neto, M., Guimaräes, P.R., Loyola, R.D. & Ulrich, W. (2008). A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos, 117, 1227–1239.Google Scholar

Alon, N., Avin, C., Koucky, M., Kozma, G., Lotker, Z. & Tuttle, M.R. (2011). Many random walks are faster than one. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing, 20, 481–502.Google Scholar

Altermatt, F., Seymour, M. & Martinez, N. (2013). River network properties shape α-diversity and community similarity patterns of aquatic insect communities across major drainage basins. Journal of Biogeography, 40, 2249–2260.Google Scholar

Amarasekare, P. (2009). Competition and coexistence in animal communities. In Levin, S.A. (ed.), The Princeton Guide to Ecology, pp. 196–201. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, T.K. & Sukhdeo, M.V.K. (2011). Host centrality in food web networks determines parasite diversity. PLoS ONE, 6 (10), e26798.Google Scholar

Andersson, E. & Bodin, Ö. (2009). Practical tool for landscape planning? An empirical investigation of network based models of habitat fragmentation. Ecography, 32, 123–132.Google Scholar

Angelini, R., Aloísio, G.R. & Carvalho, A.R. (2010). Mixed food web control and stability in a Cerrado river (Brazil). Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 10, 421–431.Google Scholar

Arditi, R. & Michalski, J. (1996). Nonlinear food web models and their responses to increased basal productivity. In Polis, G. & Winemuller, K.O. (eds), Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics, pp. 122–133. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Atmar, W. & Patterson, B.D. (1993). The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia, 96, 373–382.Google Scholar

Avin, C., Koucký, M. & Lotker, Z. (2008). How to explore a fast-changing world (Cover time of a simple random walk on evolving graphs). In Aceto, L., Damgard, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A. & Walukiewicz, I. (eds), Automata, Languages and Programming, pp. 121–132 Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Avin, C. & Krishnamachari, B. (2008). The power of choice in random walks: an empirical study. Computer Networks, 52, 44–60.Google Scholar

Azeria, E.T. (2004). Community Dynamics of Insular Biotas in Space and Time. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.Google Scholar

Banašek-Richter, C., et al. (2009). Complexity in quantitative food webs. Ecology, 90, 1470–1477.Google Scholar

Baranyi, G., Saura, S., Podani, J. & Jordán, F. (2011). Contribution of habitat patches to network connectivity: redundancy and uniqueness of topological indices. Ecological Indicators, 11, 1301–1310.Google Scholar

Barbosa, P., Hines, J., Kaplan, I., Martinson, H., Szczepaniec, A. & Szendrei, Z. (2009). Associational resistance and associational susceptibility: having right or wrong neighbours. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 40, 1–20.Google Scholar

Barbour, A.D., Karónski, M. & Rucínski, A. (1989). A central limit theorem for decomposable random variables with applications to random graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 47, 125–145.Google Scholar

Barcelo, H. & Laubenbacher, R. (2006). Graph-theoretic tools for dynamic network analysis. http://math.la.asu.edu/~helene/papers/blsocialjan06.pdf.Google Scholar

Bang-Jensen, J. & Gutin, G. (2009). Digraphs: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. 2nd ed. London: Springer.Google Scholar

Bascompte, J. (2007). Networks in ecology. Basic and Applied Ecology, 8, 485–490.Google Scholar

Bascompte, J. (2009). Disentangling the web of life. Science, 325, 416–419.Google Scholar

Bascompte, J. & Jordano, P. (2007). Plant-animal mutualistics networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 38, 567–593.Google Scholar

Bascompte, J. & Jordano, P. (2014). Mutualistic Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C.J. & Olesen, J.M. (2003). The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 93Sep-8338.Google Scholar

Bascompte, J. & Stouffer, D.B. (2009). The assembly and disassembly of ecological networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 364, 1781–1787.Google Scholar

Baskerville, E.B., Dobson, A.P., Bedford, T., Allesina, S., Anderson, T.M. & Pascual, M. (2011). Spatial guilds in the Serengeti food web revealed by a Bayesian group model. PLoS Computational Biology, 7, e1002321; doi:10.1371/journalpcbi.1002321.Google Scholar

Bassett, D.S., Wymbs, N.F., Porter, M.A., Mucha, P.J., Carlson, J.M. & Grafton, S.T. (2011). Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. PNAS, 108, 7641–7646 doi:10.1073/pnas0.1018985108.Google Scholar

Bastolla, U., Fortuna, M.A., Pascual-Garcia, A., Ferrera, A., Luque, B. & Bascompte, J. (2009). The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature, 458, 1018–1021; doi:10.1038/nature07950.Google Scholar

Beiler, K.J., Durall, D.M., Simard, S.W., Maxwell, S.A. & Kretzer, A.M. (2009). Architecture of the wood-wide web: Rhizopogon spp. genets link multiple Douglas-fir cohorts. New Phytologist, 185, 543–553.Google Scholar

Belgrano, A., Scharler, U.M., Dunne, J. & Ulanowicz, R.E. (2005). Aquatic Food Webs: An Ecosystem Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, A.D. (1974). Rhizome organization in relation to vegetative spread in Medeola virginiana. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 55, 458–468.Google Scholar

Bellay, S., Lima, D.P., Takemoto, R.M. & Luque, J.L. (2011). A host-endoparasite network of neotropical marine fish: are there organizational patterns? Parasitology, 138, 1945–1952.Google Scholar

Benedek, Z., Jordán, F. & Báldi, A. (2007). Topological keystone species complexes in ecological interaction networks. Community Ecology, 8, 1–7.Google Scholar

Bengtsson, J., Angelstam, P., Elmqvist, T., Emanuelsson, U., Folke, C., Ihse, M., Moberg, F. & Nyström, M. (2003). Reserves, resilience, and dynamic landscapes. AMBIO, 32, 389–396.Google Scholar

Benson, D.M., Grand, L.F., Vernia, C.S. & Gottwald, T.R. (2006). Temporal and spatial epidemiology of Phytophthora root rot in Fraser fir plantations. Plant Disease, 90, 1171–1180.Google Scholar

Beth, T., Borcherding, M. & Klein, B. (1994). Valuation of trust in open networks. Paper presented at the 3rd European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar

Bienert, A., Queck, R., Schmidt, A., Bernhofer, Ch. & Maas, H.-G. (2010). Voxel space analysis of terrestrial laser scans in forests for wind field modeling. International Archive for Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, and Spatial Information Science, 38, 92–97.Google Scholar

Biggs, N.L., Lloyd, E.K. & Wilson, R.J. (1976). Graph Theory 1736–1936. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bille, P. (2005). A survey on tree edit distance and related problems. Theoretical Computer Science, 337, 22–34; doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2004.12.030.Google Scholar

Bjørnstadt, O.N., Stenseth, N.C. & Saitoh, T. (1999). Synchrony and scaling in dynamics of voles and mice in northern Japan. Ecology, 80, 622–637.Google Scholar

Blanchet, F.G., Legendre, P. & Borcard, D. (2008). Modelling directional spatial processes in ecological data. Ecological Modelling, 215, 325–336.Google Scholar

Blanchet, F.G., Legendre, P., Maranger, R., Monti, D. & Pepin, P. (2011). Modelling the effect of directional spatial ecological processes at different scales. Oecologia, 166, 357–368.Google Scholar

Blick, R. & Burns, K.C. (2009). Network properties of arboreal plants: are epiphytes, mistletoes and lianas structured similarly? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 11, 41–52; doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2008.10.002.Google Scholar

Blonder, B. & Dornhaus, A. (2011). Time-ordered networks reveal limitations to information flow in ant colonies. PLoS ONE, 6 (5), e20298.Google Scholar

Blonder, B., Wey, T.W., Dornhaus, A., James, R. & Sih, A. (2012). Temporal dynamics and network analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 958–972; doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00236.x.Google Scholar

Blüthgen, N., Fründ, J., Vazquez, D.P. & Menzel, F. (2008). What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? Ecology, 89, 3387–3399.Google Scholar

Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F. & Blüthgen, N. (2006). Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecology, 6. doi:0.86/472-6785-6-9.Google Scholar

Bode, M., Burrage, K. & Possingham, H.P. (2008). Using complex network metrics to predict the persistence of metapopulations with asymmetric connectivity patterns. Ecological Modelling, 214, 201–209.Google Scholar

Bonacich, P.F. (1972). Power and centrality: a family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1170–1182.Google Scholar

Borcard, D., Gillet, F. & Legendre, P. (2011). Numerical ecology with R. New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar

Borcard, D., Legendre, P., Avois-Jacquet, C. & Tuomisto, H. (2004). Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology, 85, 1826–1832.Google Scholar

Borgatti, S.P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27, 55–71.Google Scholar

Borgwardt, K.M. & Kriegel, H.-P. (2005). Shortest-path kernels on graphs. Paper presented at the International Conference on Data Mining, Houston, TX.Google Scholar

Borgwardt, K.M., Ong, C.S., Schönauer, S., Vishwanathan, S.V.N., Smola, A.J. & Kriegel, H.-P. (2005). Protein function prediction via graph kernels. Bioinformatics, 21 (s1), 1–10; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1007.Google Scholar

Borgwardt, K.M., Petri, T., Vishwanathan, S.V.N. & Kriegel, H.-P. (2007). An efficient sampling scheme for comparison of large graphs. Paper presented at the Conference on Mining and Learning with Graphs, Firence, Italy.Google Scholar

Boyland, N.K., James, R., Mlynski, D.T., Madden, J.R. & Croft, D.P. (2013). Spatial proximity loggers for recording animal social networks: consequences of inter-logger variation in performance. Behavioural and Ecological Sociobiology, 67, 1877–1890.Google Scholar

Brandes, U. & Fleischer, D. (2005). Centrality measures based on current flow. In Diekert, V. & Durand, B. (eds), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, pp. 533–544. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Brin, S. & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks & ISDN Systems, 30, 107–117.Google Scholar

Brooks, C.P., Antonovics, J. & Keitt, T.H. (2008). Spatial and temporal heterogeneity explain disease dynamics in a spatially explicit network model. American Naturalist, 172, 1415-Sep9.Google Scholar

Brüggemann, R. & Carlsen, L. (2006). Partial Order in Environmental Sciences and Chemistry. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Bryden, J., Funk, S., Geard, N., Bullock, S. & Jansen, V.A.A. (2011). Stability in flux: community structure in dynamic networks. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 8, 1031–1040.Google Scholar

Buhl, J., Hicks, K., Miller, E.R., Persey, S., Alinvi, O. & Sumpter, D.J.T. (2009). Shape and effi-ciency of wood ant foraging networks. Behavioural Ecology & Sociobiology, 63, 451–460.Google Scholar

Bukovinszky, T., van Veen, F.J.F., Jongema, Y. & Dicke, M. (2008). Direct and indirect effects of resource quality on food web structure. Science, 319, 804–807.Google Scholar

Bunescu, R. & Mooney, R. (2005). A shortest path dependency kernel for relation extraction. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 724–731. Vancouver, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Bunn, A.G., Urban, D.L. & Keitt, T.H. (2000). Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. Journal of Environmental Management, 59, 265–278.Google Scholar

Burkle, L. & Irwin, R. (2009). The importance of interannual variation and bottom-up nitrogen enrichment for plant-pollinator networks. Oikos, 118. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17740.x.Google Scholar

Buss, L.W. & Jackson, J.B.C. (1979). Competitive networks: nontransitive competitive relationships in cryptic coral reef environments. American Naturalist, 113, 223–234.Google Scholar

Butts, C.T. (2009). Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science, 325, 414–416.Google Scholar

Caceres, R.S. & Berger-Wolf, T. (2013). Temporal scale of dynamic networks. In Holme, P. & Saramäki, J. (eds), Temporal Networks, pp. 65–94. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Cahill, J.F., Elle, E., Smith, G.R. & Shore, B.H. (2008). Disruption of a belowground mutualism alters interactions between plants and their floral visitors. Ecology, 89, 1791–1801.Google Scholar

Cahill, J.F., Kembel, S.W. & Gustafson, D.J. (2005). Differential genetic differences on competitive effect and response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Ecology, 93, 958–967.Google Scholar

Canard, E.F., Mouquet, N., Mouillot, D., Stank, M., Miklisova, D. & Gravel, D. (2014). Empirical evaluation of neutral interactions in host-parasite networks. The American Naturalist, 183, 468–479.Google Scholar

Cantor, M., Shoemaker, L.G., Cabral, R.B., Flores, C.O., Varga, M. & Whitehead, H. (2015). Multilevel animal societies can emerge from cultural transmission. Nature Communications, 6. doi:10.1038/ncomms9091.Google Scholar

Capitán, J.A., Arenas, A. & Guimerà, R. (2013). Degree of intervality of food webs: from body-size to models. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 334, 35–44.Google Scholar

Cardinal, J., Collete, S. & Langerman, S. (2009). Empty region graphs. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 42, 183–195.Google Scholar

Careddu, G., Costantini, M.L., Calizza, E., Carlino, P., Bentivoglio, F., Orlandi, L. & Rossi, L. (2015). Effects of terrestrial input on macrobenthic food webs of a coastal sea are detected by stable isotope analysis in Gaeta Gulf. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 154, 158–168.Google Scholar

Carley, K.M. (2003). Dynamic network analysis. In Breiger, R., Carley, K.M. & Pattison, P. (eds), Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, pp. 133–145. Washington, DC: Committee on Human Factors, National Research Council.Google Scholar

Carrara, F., Altermatt, F., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. & Rinaldo, A. (2012). Dendritic connectivity controls biodiversity patterns in experimental metacommunities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 15, 5761–5766.Google Scholar

Carrara, F., Rinaldo, A., Giometto, A. & Altermatt, F. (2014). Complex interaction of dendritic connectivity and hierarchical patch size on biodiversity in river-like landscapes. The American Naturalist, 183, 13–25.Google Scholar

Carstensen, D.W., Sabatino, M., Trøjelsgaard, K. & Morellato, L.P.C. (2014). Beta diversity of plant-pollinator networks and the spatial turnover of pairwise interactions. PLoS ONE, 9 (11), e112903.Google Scholar

Cartozo, C.C., Garlaschelli, D. & Caldarelli, G. (2006). Graph theory and food webs. In Pascual, M. & Dunne, J.A. (eds), Ecological Networks: Linking Structure to Dynamics in Food Webs, pp. 93–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cartwright, D. & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory. Psychology Review, 63, 277–293.Google Scholar

Casteigts, A., Flocchini, P., Quattrociocchi, W. & Santoro, N. (2011). Time-varying graphs and dynamic networks. arXiv:1012.0009v3 [cs.DC].Google Scholar

Cayley, A. (1857). On the theory of analytical forms called trees. Philosophical Magazine, 13, 19–30.Google Scholar

Cerdeira, J.O., Pinto, L.S., Cabeza, M. & Gaston, K.J. (2010). Species specific connectivity in reserve-network design using graphs. Biological Conservation, 143, 408–415.Google Scholar

Céréghino, R., Giraudel, J.L. & Compin, A. (2001). Spatial analysis of stream invertebrates distribution in the Adour-Garonne drainage basin (France), using Kohonen self-organization maps. Ecological Modelling, 146, 167–180.Google Scholar

Chan, J., Bailey, J. & Leckie, C. (2008). Discovering correlated spatio-temporal changes in evolving graphs. Knowledge & Information Systems, 16, 53–96.Google Scholar

Charbonneau, D., Blonder, B. & Dornhaus, A. (2013). Social insects: a model system for network dynamics. In Holme, X.P. & Saramäki, X.J. (eds), Temporal Networks, pp. 217–244. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Chardon, J.P., Adriaensen, F. & Matthysen, E. (2003). Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled Wood Butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.). Landscape Ecology, 18, 561–573.Google Scholar

Chartrand, G. & Lesniak, L. (2005). Graphs and Digraphs. 4th ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar

Chave, J. (2009). Competition, neutrality, and community organization. In Levin, S.A. (ed.), The Princeton Guide to Ecology, pp. 264–273. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Chen, H.-W., Liu, W.-C., Davis, A.J., Jordán, F., Hwang, M.-J. & Shao, K.-T. (2008). Network position of hosts in food webs and their parasite diversity. Oikos, 117, 1847–1855.Google Scholar

Chetkiewicz, C.-L., St. Clair, C. & Boyce, M. (2006). Corridors for conservation: integrating pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 37, 317–342.Google Scholar

Chung, F.R.K. (1997). Spectral Graph Theory. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar

Clay, K. (1990). The impact of parasitic and mutualistic fungi on competitive interactions among plants. In Grace, J.B. & Tilman, D. (eds), Perspectives on Plant Competition, pp. 391–412. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Codling, E.A., Plank, M.J. & Benhamou, S. (2008). Random walk models in biology. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 5, 813–834.Google Scholar

Cohen, J.E. & Palka, Z.J. (1990). A stochastic theory of community food webs. V. Intervality and triangulation in the trophic-niche overlap graph. The American Naturalist, 135, 435–463.Google Scholar

Cohn, R.D. (1999). Comparisons of multivariate relational structures in serially correlated data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological & Environmental Statistics, 4, 238–257.Google Scholar

Colinvaux, P.A. (1979). Why Big Fierce Animals Are Rare: An Ecologist's Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Compieta, P., Di Martino, S., Bertolotto, M., Ferrucci, F. & Kechadi, T. (2007). Exploratory spatio-temporal data mining and visualization. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 18, 255–279; doi:10.1016/j.jvc.2007.02.006.Google Scholar

Cook, R.E. (1988). Growth in Medeola virginiana clones. I. Field observations. American Journal of Botany, 75, 725–731.Google Scholar

Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L. & Stein, C. (2009). Introduction to Algorithms. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Corson, F. (2010). Fluctuations and redundancy in optimal transport networks. Physical Review Letters, 104, 048703.Google Scholar

Cote, D., Kehler, D.G., Bourne, C. & Wiersma, Y.F. (2009). A new measure of longitudinal connectivity for stream networks. Landscape Ecology, 24, 101–113.Google Scholar

Craft, M.E. & Caillaud, D. (2011). Network models: an underutilized tool in wildlife epidemiology. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, 2011. doi:10.1155/2011/676949.Google Scholar

Craft, M.E., Volz, E., Packer, C. & Meyers, L.A. (2010). Disease transmission in territorial populations: the small-world network of Serengeti lions. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 8. doi:10.1098/rsif.2010.0511.Google Scholar

Cressie, N.A.C. (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Cressie, N. & Wikle, C.K. (2011). Statistics for Spatio-Temporal Data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Croft, D.P., Madden, J.R., Franks, D.W. & James, R. (2011). Hypothesis testing in animal social networks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 502–507.Google Scholar

Cui, S., Hero, A.O., Luo, Z.-Q. & Moura, J.M.F. (2016). Big Data over Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cumming, G.S. (2016). Heterarchies: Reconciling networks and hierarchies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, XX31. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.04.009.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T. (1977a). Graph theoretical analysis of the phytosociological structure of plant communities: the theoretical basis. Vegetatio, 34, 137–154.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T. (1977b). Graph theoretical analysis of the phytosociological structure of plant communities: an application to mixed forest. Vegetatio, 35, 35–46.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T. (1982). Phytosociological structure of seaweed communities and the invasion of Fucus serratus in Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Botany, 60, 2652–2658.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T. (1984). The contiguity of upslope and downslope boundaries of species in a zoned community. Oikos, 42, 92–96.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T. (1986). Overlap and spacing of species’ ranges on an environmental gradient. Oikos, 47, 303–308.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T. (1999). Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T. & Fortin, M.-J. (2009). Spatial autocorrelation and statistical tests: some solutions. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 14, 188–206.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T. & Fortin, M.-J. (2010). From graphs to spatial graphs. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41, 21–38.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T. & Fortin, M.-J. (2014). Spatial Analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T., John, E.A. & Blundon, D.J. (1991). Contact sampling for the detection of interspecific association: a comparison in two vegetation types. Journal of Ecology, 79, 781–792.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T. & Moon, J. (1988). Statistical tests on two characteristics of the shapes of cluster diagrams. Journal of Classification, 5, 21–38.Google Scholar

Dale, M.R.T. & Thomas, A.G. (1987). The structure of weed communities in Saskatchewan fields. Weed Science, 35, 348–355.Google Scholar

Danon, L., Ford, A.P., House, T., Jewell, C.P., Keeling, M.J., Roberts, G.O., Ross, J.V. & Vernon, M.C. (2011). Networks and the epidemiology of infectious disease. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, 2011. doi:10.1155/2011/284909.Google Scholar

Darlington, P.J. (1957). Zoogeography: The Geographical Distribution of Animals. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1862). On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids Are Fertilized by Insects and on the Good Effects of Intercrossing. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

David, F.N., Kendall, M.G. & Barton, D.E. (1966). Symmetric Functions and Allied Tables. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, J.A. (1967). Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations, 29, 181–187.Google Scholar

Davis, K.F., D'Odorico, P., Laio, F. & Ridolfi, L. (2013). Global spatio-temporal patterns in human migration: a complex network perspective. PLoS ONE, 8, e53723; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053723.Google Scholar

Decout, S., Manel, S., Miaud, C. & Luque, S. (2012). Integrative approach for landscape based graph connectivity analysis: a case study with the common frog (Rana temporaria), in human dominated landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 27, 267–279.Google Scholar

de Jong, P., Aarssen, L.W. & Turkington, R. (1983). The analysis of contact sampling data. Journal of Ecology, 71, 545–559.Google Scholar

Del Mondo, G., Stell, J.G., Claramunt, C. & Thibaud, R. (2010). A graph model for spatio-temporal evolution. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 16, 1452–1477.Google Scholar

Demattei, C. & Cucala, L. (2009). Multiple spatio-temporal cluster detection for case event data: an ordering-based approach. Communications in Statistics: Theory & Methods, 40, 3 Mar-5872.Google Scholar

den Boer, P.J. (1968). Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. Acta Biotheoretica, 18, 165–194.Google Scholar

Deshpande, M., Kuramochi, M., Wale, N. & Karypis, G. (2005). Frequent substructure-based approaches for classifying chemical compounds. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17, 1036–1050.Google Scholar

de Vries, H., Stevens, J.M.G. & Vervaecke, H. (2006). Measuring and testing the steepness of dominance hierarchies. Animal Behaviour, 71, 585–592.Google Scholar

Di Battista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R. & Tollis, I.G. (1994). Algorithms for drawing graphs. Computational Geometry, 4, 235–282.Google Scholar

Ding, C., He, X., Xiong, H., Peng, H. & Holbrook, S.R. (2006). Transitive closure and metric inequality of weighted graphs: detecting protein interaction modules using cliques. International Journal of Data Mining and Informatics, 1, 162–177.Google Scholar

Do, A.-L.J. & Gross, T. (2012). Self-Organization in Continuous Adaptive Networks. Aalborg, Denmark: River.Google Scholar

Donetti, L., Neri, F. & Munoz, M.A. (2006). Optimal network topologies: expanders, cages, Ramanujan graphs, entangled networks and all that. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 8, P 8007; arXiv:cond-mat/0605565v2.Google Scholar

Doreian, P. & Mrvar, A. (1996). A partitioning approach to structural balance. Social Networks, 18, 149–168.Google Scholar

Dormann, C.F. (2006). Competition hierarchy, transitivity and additivity: investigating the effect of fertilization on plant-plant interactions using three common bryophytes. Plant Ecology, 191, 171–184.Google Scholar

Dormann, C.F. (2011). How to be a specialist? Quantifying specialization in pollination networks. Network Biology, 1, 1–20.Google Scholar

Dormann, C.F., Fründ, J., Blüthgen, N. & Gruber, B. (2009). Indices, graphs, and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. The Open Ecological Journal, 2, 7–24.Google Scholar

Dorogovstsev, S.N. & Mendes, J.F.F. (2002). Evolution of networks. Advances in Physics, 51, 1079–1187.Google Scholar

Dos Santos, D.A., Fernandez, H.R., Cuezzo, M.G. & Dominguez, E. (2008). Sympatry inference and network analysis in biogeography. Systematic Biology, 57, 432–448.Google Scholar

Doyle, F.I. & Smith, J.N.M. (2001). Raptors and scavengers. In Krebs, C.J., Boutin, S. & Boonstra, R. (eds), Ecosystem Dynamics of the Boreal Forest: The Kluane Project, pp. 377–404 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dray, S., Chessel, D. & Thioulouse, J. (2003). Co-inertia analysis and the linking of the ecological data tables. Ecology, 84, 3078–3089.Google Scholar

Dray, S., Legendre, P. & Peres-Neto, P.R. (2006). Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecological Modelling, 196, 483–493.Google Scholar

Dray, S., Pélissier, R., Couteron, P., Fortin, M.-J., Legendre, P., Peres-Neto, P.R., Bellier, E., et al. (2012). Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. Ecological Monographs, 82, 257–275.Google Scholar

Drewe, J.A., Weber, N., Carter, S.P., Bearhop, S., Harrison, X.A., Dall, S.R.X., McDonald, R.A. & Delahay, R.J. (2012). Performance of proximity loggers in recording intra- and inter-species interactions: a laboratory and field-based validation study. PLoS ONE, 7, e39068.Google Scholar

Duboscq, J., Romano, V., Sueur, C. & MacIntosh, A.J.J. (2015). Network centrality and seasonality interact to predict lice load in a social primate. Scientific Reports, 6, 22095; doi:10.1038/srep22095.Google Scholar

Duncan, A.J., Gunn, G.J., Lewis, F.I., Umstatter, C. & Humphry, R.W. (2012). The influence of empirical contact networks on modelling diseases in cattle. Epidemics, 4, 117–123.Google Scholar

Dunne, J.A. (2006). The network structure of food webs. In Pascual, M. & Dunne, J.A. (eds), Ecological Networks: Linking Structure to Dynamics in Food Webs, pp. 27–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dunne, J.A., Lafferty, K.D., Dobson, A.P., Hechinger, R.F. & Kuris, A.M. (2013). Parasites affect food web structure primarily through increased diversity and complexity. PLoSBiol, 11 (6): e1001579; doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001579.Google Scholar

Dunne, J.A., Williams, R.J. & Martinez, N.D. (2002a). Network structure and biodiversity loss in food-webs: robustness increases with connectance. Ecology Letters, 5, 558–567.Google Scholar

Dunne, J.A., Williams, R.J. & Martinez, N.D. (2002b). Food-web structure and network theory: the role of connectance and size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 12917–12922.Google Scholar

Durrett, R. (2007). Random Graph Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dyer, R.J., Chan, D.M., Gardiakos, V.A. & Meadows, C.A. (2012). Pollination graphs: quantifying pollen pool covariance networks and the influence of intervening landscape on genetic connectivity in the North American understory tree, Cornus florida L. Landscape Ecology, 27, 239–251.Google Scholar

Dyer, R.J. & Nason, J.D. (2004). Population graphs: the graph theoretic shape of genetic structure. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1713–1727.Google Scholar

Economo, E.P. & Keitt, T.H. (2008). Species diversity in neutral metacommunities: a network approach. Ecology Letters, 11, 52–62.Google Scholar

Edgington, E.S. (1995). Randomization Tests. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar

Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Eifrem, E. (2014). Graph theory: key to understanding big data. Wired, May 5.Google Scholar

Eiler, A. (2006). Evidence for the ubiquity of mixotrophic bacteria in the upper ocean: implications and consequences. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72 (12), 7431–7437; doi:10.1128/AEM.01559-06.Google Scholar

Erdös, P. (1963). On a problem in graph theory. Mathematical Gazette, 47, 220–223.Google Scholar

Erdös, P., Harary, F. & Tutte, W.T. (1965). On the dimension of a graph. Mathematika, 12, 118–122.Google Scholar

Erdös, P. & Moon, J.W. (1964). On subgraphs of the complete bipartite graph. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 7, 35–39.Google Scholar

Erdös, P. & Rényi, A. (1960). On the evolution of random graphs. Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 5, 17–61.Google Scholar

Erös, T., Olden, J.D., Schick, R.S., Schmera, D. & Fortin, M.-J. (2012). Characterizing connectivity relationships in freshwaters using patch-based graphs. Landscape Ecology, 27, 303–317.Google Scholar

Escoufier, Y. (1973). Le traitement des variables vectorielles. Biometrics, 29, 751–760.Google Scholar

Escudero, A., Pajarón, S. & Gavilán, R. (1994). Saxicolous communities in the Sierra del Moncayo (Spain): a classificatory study. Coenoses, 9, 15–24.Google Scholar

Estrada, E. (2006). Network robustness to targeted attacks: the interplay of expansibility and robustness. The European Physical Journal B, 52, 563–574.Google Scholar

Estrada, E. (2007). Characterization of topological keystone species: local, global and “meso-scale” centralities in food webs. Ecological Complexity, 4, 46–57.Google Scholar

Estrada, E. (2012). The Structure of Complex Networks: Theory and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Estrada, E. & Bodin, Ö. (2008). Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. Ecological Applications, 18, 1810–1825.Google Scholar

Facchetti, G., Iacono, G. & Altafini, C. (2011). Computing global structural balance in large-scale signed social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 20953–20958.Google Scholar

Fagan, W.F. (2002). Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations. Ecology, 83, 3243–3249.Google Scholar

Fagan, W.F. & Calabrese, J.M. (2014). The correlated random walk and the rise of movement ecology. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 95, 204–206.Google Scholar

Fall, A., Fortin, M.-J., Manseau, M. & O'Brien, D. (2007). Spatial graphs: principles and applications for habitat connectivity. Ecosystems, 10, 448–461.Google Scholar

Fang, W. (2005). Spatial analysis of an invasion front of Acer platanoides: dynamic inferences from static data. Ecography, 28, 283–294.Google Scholar

Farine, D.R. & Whitehead, H. (2015). Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology, 84, 1144–1163.Google Scholar

Fattorini, S. (2007). Non-randomness in the species-area relationship: testing the underlying mechanisms. Oikos, 116, 678–689.Google Scholar

Fattorini, S. & Fowles, A.P. (2005). A biogeographical analysis of the tenebrionid beetles (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) of the island of Thasos in the context of the Aegean Islands (Greece). Journal of Natural History, 39, 3919–3949.Google Scholar

Fedor, A. & Vasas, V. (2009). The robustness of keystone indices in food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 260, 372–378.Google Scholar

Feeley, K.J., Gillespie, T.W., Lebbin, D.J. & Walter, H.S. (2007). Species characteristics associated with extinction vulnerability and nestedness rankings of birds in tropical forest fragments. Animal Conservation, 10, 493–501.Google Scholar

Ferrari, J.R., Lookingbill, T.R. & Neel, M.C. (2007). Two measures of landscape graph connectivity: assessments across gradients in area and configuration. Landscape Ecology, 22, 1315; doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9121-7.Google Scholar

Flitcroft, R.L., Burnett, K.M., Reeves, G.H. & Ganio, L.M. (2012). Do network relationships matter? Comparing network and instream habitat variables to explain densities of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in mid-coastal Oregon, USA. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 22, 288–302.Google Scholar

Fodor, E. (2013). Linking biodiversity to mutualistic networks: woody species and ectomycorrhizal fungi. Annals of Forest Research, 56, 53–78.Google Scholar

Fortin, M.-J. & Payette, S. (2002). How to test the significance of the relation between spatially autocorrelated data at the landscape scale: a case study using fire and forest maps. Ecoscience, 9, 213–218.Google Scholar

Fortuna, M.A. & Bascompte, J. (2008). The network approach in ecology. In Valladares, F., Camacho, A., Elosegui, A., Estrada, M. & Garcia, C. (eds), Unity in Diversity: Reflections on Ecology after the Legacy of Ramon Margalef, pp. 371–93. Madrid: Fundación BBVA.Google Scholar

Fortuna, M.A., Garcia, C., Guimaräes, P.R. & Bascompte, J. (2008). Spatial mating networks in insect-pollinated plants. Ecology Letters, 11, 490–498.Google Scholar

Fortuna, M.A., Gómez-Rodriguez, C. & Bascompte, J. (2006). Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1429–1434.Google Scholar

Fortuna, M.A., Popa-Lisseanu, A.G., Ibañaz, C. & Bascompte, J. (2009). The roosting spatial network of a bird-predator bat. Ecology, 90, 934–944.Google Scholar

Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. arXiv:0906.0612v2 [physics.soc-ph].Google Scholar

Fowler, N.L. (1990). Disorderliness in plant communities: comparisons, causes, and consequences. In Grace, J.B. & Tilman, D. (eds), Perspectives on Plant Competition, pp. 291–306. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Franc, A. (2003). Metapopulation dynamics as a contact process on a graph. Ecological Complexity, 1, 49–63; doi:10.1016/jecocom.2003.10.02.Google Scholar

Frank, K. (1995). Identifying cohesive subgroups. Social Networks, 17, 27–56.Google Scholar

Frean, M. & Abraham, E.R. (2001). Rock-scissors-paper and the survival of the weakest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 1323–1327.Google Scholar

Freckleton, R.P. & Watkinson, A.R. (2001). Predicting competition coefficients for plant mixtures: reciprocity, transitivity and correlations with life-history traits. Ecology Letters, 4, 348–357.Google Scholar

Freeman, L.C., Borgatti, S.P. & White, D.R. (1991). Centrality in valued graphs: a measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks, 13, 141–154.Google Scholar

Fuller, M.M., Wagner, A. & Enquist, B.J. (2008). Using network analysis to characterize forest structure. Natural Resource Modelling, 21, 225–247.Google Scholar

Galpern, P., Manseau, M. & Fall, A. (2011). Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: a guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biological Conservation, 144, 44–55.Google Scholar

Ganguly, N., Deutsch, A. & Mukherjee, A. (2009). Dynamics on and of Complex Networks. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Ganio, L.M., Torgersen, C.E. & Gresswell, R.E. (2005). A geostatistical approach for describing spatial pattern in stream networks. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 3, 138–144.Google Scholar

Gao, X., Xiao, B., Tao, D. & Li, X. (2010). A survey of graph edit distance. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 13, 113–129; doi:10.1007/s10044-008-0141-y.Google Scholar

Garcia, D., Zamora, R. & Amico, G.C. (2011). The spatial scale of plant-animal interactions: effects of resource availability and habitat structure. Ecological Monographs, 81, 103–121.Google Scholar

Garroway, C.J., Bowman, J., Carr, D. & Wilson, P.J. (2008). Applications of graph theory to landscape genetics. Evolutionary Applications, 1, 620–630.Google Scholar

Gärtner, T. (2003). A survey of kernels for structured data. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 5 (1), 49–58.Google Scholar

Gärtner, T. (2008). Kernels for Structured Data. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar

Gärtner, T., Flach, P.A. & Wrobel, S. (2003). On graph kernels: hardness results and efficient alternatives. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference on Learning Theory and Seventh Annual Workshop on Kernel Machines, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 129–143. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Gasalla, M.A., Rodrigues, A.R. & Postuma, F.A. (2010). The trophic role of the squid Loligo plei as a keystone species in the South Brazil Bight ecosystem. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67, 1413–1424.Google Scholar

Gehring, C.A., Mueller, R.C., Haskins, K.E., Rubow, T.K. & Whitham, T.G. (2014). Convergence in mycorrhizal fungal communities to drought, plant competition, parasitism, and susceptibility to herbivory: consequences for fungi and host plants. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, 306; doi:10.3389/micb.2014.00306.Google Scholar

Gilarranz, L.J. & Bascompte, J. (2012). Spatial network structure and metapopulation persistence. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 297, 11–16.Google Scholar

Gilarranz, L.J., Hastings, A. & Bascompte, J. (2015). Inferring topology from dynamics in spatial networks. Theoretical Ecology, 8 doi:10.1007/s12080-014-0231-y.Google Scholar

Girvan, M. & Newman, M.E.J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 7821–7826.Google Scholar

Glaz, J., Naus, J. & Wallenstein, S. (2001). Scan Statistics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: The Making of a New Science. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Godfrey, S.S. (2013). Networks and the ecology of parasite transmission: a framework for wildlife parasitology. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife, 2, 235–245.Google Scholar

Godfrey, S.S., Moore, J.A., Nelson, N.J. & Bull, C.M. (2010). Social network structure and parasite infection patterns in a territorial reptile, the Tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus). International Journal of Parasitology, 40, 1575–1585.Google Scholar

Gollo, L.L. & Breakspear, M. (2014). The frustrated brain: from dynamics on motifs to communities and networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 369; doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0532.Google Scholar

Gómez, J.M., Perfectii, F. & Jordano, P. (2011). The functional consequences of mutualistic network architecture. PLoS ONE, 6, e16143; doi.10.1371/journal.pone.0016143.Google Scholar

Gómez, S., Montiel, J., Torres, D. & Fernández, A. (2012). MultiDendrograms: variable-group agglomerative hierarchical clusterings. arXiv:1201.1623v2.Google Scholar

Goodall, D.W. (1966). The nature of the mixed community. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia, 1, 84–96.Google Scholar

Gordon, A.D. & Birks, H.J.B. (1972). Numerical methods in Quaternary paleoecology. I. Zonation of pollen diagrams. New Phytologist, 71, 961–979.Google Scholar

Gordon, A.D. & Birks, H.J.B. (1974). Numerical methods in Quaternary paleoecology. II. Comparison of pollen diagrams. New Phytologist, 73, 221–249.Google Scholar

Grace, J.B., Guntespurgen, G.R. & Keough, J. (1993). The examination of a competition matrix for transitivity and intransitive loops. Oikos, 68, 91–98.Google Scholar

Graham, S.P., Hassan, H.K., Burkett-Cadena, N.D., Guyer, C. & Unnasch, T.R. (2009). Nestedness of ectoparasite-vertebrate host networks. PLoS ONE, 4, e7873; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007873.Google Scholar

Grant, E.H.C., Lowe, W.H. & Fagan, W.F. (2007). Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. Ecology Letters, 10, 165–175.Google Scholar

Greenland, S., Pearl, J. & Robins, J.M. (1999). Causal diagrams for epidemiological research. Epidemiology, 10, 37–48.Google Scholar

Grime, J.P. (1979). Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Grindrod, P., Parsons, M.C., Higham, D.J. & Estrada, E. (2011). Communicability across evolving networks. Physical Review E, 83, 046120; doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.83.046120.Google Scholar

Gross, T. & Blasius, B. (2008). Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 5, 259–271.Google Scholar

Guerrero, C., Milenkovic, T., Pržulj, N., Kaiser, P. & Huang, L. (2008). Characterization of the proteasome interaction network using a qtax-based tag-team strategy and protein interaction network analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 13333–13338.Google Scholar

Guha, R., Kumar, K., Raghavan, P. & Tomkins, A. (2004). Propagation of trust and distrust. Paper ACM 1-58113-844-X/04/0005 presented at ACM WWW, New York.Google Scholar

Guillaume, J.-L. & Latapy, M. (2006). Bipartite graphs as models of complex networks. Physica A, 371, 795–813.Google Scholar

Guimerà, R. & Sales-Pardo, M. (2006). Form follows function: the architecture of complex networks. Molecular Systems Biology, 2 Article 42. doi:10.1038/msb4100082.Google Scholar

Guimerà, R. & Sales-Pardo, M. (2009). Missing and spurious interactions and the reconstruction of complex networks. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 52, 22073–22078.Google Scholar

Hagen, M., et al. (2012). Biodiversity, species interactions and ecological networks in a fragmented world. Advances in Ecological Research, 46, 89–185.Google Scholar

Hamede, R.K., Bashford, J., McCallum, H. & Jones, M. (2009). Contact networks in a wild Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) population: using social network analysis to reveal seasonal variability in social behavior and its implications for transmission of devil facial tumour disease. Ecology Letters, 12, 1–11.Google Scholar

Hammer, A.C. & Pitchford, J.W. (2005). The role of mixotrophy in plankton bloom dynamics and the consequences for productivity. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 62, 833–840.Google Scholar

Hampton, S.E., Strasser, C.A., Tewksbury, J.J., Gram, W.K., Budden, A.E., Batcheller, A.L., Duke, C.S. & Porter, J.H. (2013). Big data and the future of ecology. Frontiers of Ecology and Environment, 11, 156–162; doi:10.1890/120103.Google Scholar

Hanski, I. (2009). Metapopulations and spatial population processes. In Levin, S.A. (ed.), The Princeton Guide to Ecology, pp. 177–185. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Harary, F. (1953). On the notion of balance of a signed graph. Michigan Mathematical Journal, 2, 143–146.Google Scholar

Harary, F. (1959). On the measurement of structural balance. Behavioral Science, 4, 316–323.Google Scholar

Harary, F. (1969). Graph Theory. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Harary, F. & Gupta, G (1997). Dynamic graph models. Mathematical & Computer Modelling, 25, 79–87.Google Scholar

Harper, J.L. (1977). Population Biology of Plants. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Harvey, E. & Miller, T.E. (1996). Variance in composition of inquiline communities in leaves of Sarracenia purpurea L. on multiple spatial scales. Oecologia, 108, 562–566.Google Scholar

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Hobaiter, C., Poisot, T., Zuberbühler, K., Hoppitt, W. & Gruber, T. (2014). Social network analysis shows direct evidence for social transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees. PLOS Biology, 12, e1001960.Google Scholar

Hock, K. & Mumby, P.J. (2015). Quantifying the reliability of dispersal paths in connectivity networks. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12, 20150013; doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0013.Google Scholar

Hodges, K.E., Krebs, C.J., Hik, D.S., Stefan, C.I., Gillis, E.A. & Doyle, C.E. (2001). Snowshoe hare demography. In Krebs, C.J., Boutin, S. & Boonstra, R. (eds), Ecosystem Dynamics of the Boreal Forest: The Kluane Project, pp. 141–178 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hofmann, T., Schölkopf, B. & Smola, A.J. (2008). Kernel methods in machine learning. The Annals of Statistics, 36, 1171–1220; doi:10.1214/009053607000000677.Google Scholar

Hollén, L.I. & Radford, A.N. (2009). The development of alarm call behavior in mammals and birds. Animal Behaviour, 78, 791–800.Google Scholar

Holme, P. (2013). Epidemiologically optimal static networks from temporal network data. PLoS Computational Biology, 9, e1003142.Google Scholar

Holme, P. & Saramäki, J. (2011). Temporal networks. Physics Reports, 519, 97–125.Google Scholar

Holme, P. & Saramäki, J. (2013). Temporal Networks. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Holt, R.D. (2002). Food webs in space: on the interplay of dynamic in stability and spatial processes. Ecological Research, 17, 261–273.Google Scholar

Holt, R.D. (2009). Predation and community organization. In Levin, S.A. (ed.), The Princeton Guide to Ecology, pp. 274–281. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Holt, R.D. & Hoopes, M.F. (2005). Food web dynamics in a metacommunity context: modules and beyond. In Holyoak, P., Leibold, M.A. & Holt, R.D. (eds), Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities, pp. 68–93. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Holyoak, M. (2000). Habitat subdivision causes changes in food web structure. Ecology Letters, 3, 509–515.Google Scholar

Horn, H.S. (1975). Markovian processes of forest succession. In Cody, M.L. & Diamond, J.M. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Communities, pp. 196–211. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Horn, H.S. (1976). Succession. In May, R.M. (ed.), Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications, pp. 187–204. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar

Horváth, D.X. & Kertész, J. (2014). Spreading dynamics on networks: the role of burstiness, topology and non-stationarity. New Journal of Physics, 16. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/7/73037.Google Scholar

Howard, T.G. (2001). The relationship of total and per-gram rankings in competitive effect to the natural abundance of herbaceous perennials. Journal of Ecology, 89, 110–117.Google Scholar

Huffaker, C.B. (1958). Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia, 27, 343–383.Google Scholar

Hulovatyy, Y., Chen, H. & Milenkovic, T. (2015). Exploring the structure and function of temporal networks with dynamic graphlets. Bioinformatics, 31, 1171–1180.Google Scholar

Husté, A. & Boulinier, T. (2011). Determinants of bird community composition on patches in suburbs of Paris, France. Biological Conservation, 144, 243–252.Google Scholar

Ilany, A., Barocas, A., Koren, L., Kam, M. & Geffen, E. (2013). Structural balance in the social networks of a wild mammal. Animal Behaviour, 85, 1397–1405.Google Scholar

Illian, J.B., Penttinen, A., Stoyan, H. & Stoyan, D. (2008). Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Ings, T.C., et al. (2008). Ecological networks – beyond food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01460.x.Google Scholar

Itzhaki, Z., Akiva, E. & Margalit, H. (2010). Preferential use of protein domain pairs as interaction mediators: order and transitivity. Bioinformatics, 26, 2564–2570.Google Scholar

Ives, A.R. & Godfray, H.C.J. (2006). Phylogenetic analysis of trophic associations. The American Naturalist, 168, E1–E14; www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/505157.Google Scholar

Iyengar, V.S. (2005). Space-time clusters with flexible shapes. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 54, 71–76.Google Scholar

Jacquez, G.M. (1996). A k nearest neighbour test for space–time interaction. Statistical Medicine, 15, 1935–1949.Google Scholar

James, A., Pitchford, J.W. & Plank, M.J. (2012). Disentangling nestedness from models of ecological complexity. Nature, 487, 227–230.Google Scholar

James, P., Rayfield, B., Fortin, M.-J., Fall, A. & Farley, G. (2005). Reserve network design combining spatial graph theory and species’ spatial requirements. Geomatica, 59, 323–333.Google Scholar

James, P.M.A., Fleming, R.A. & Fortin, M.-J. (2010). Identifying significant scale-specific spatial boundaries using wavelets and null models: spruce budworm defoliation in Ontario, Canada, as a case study. Landscape Ecology, 25, 873–887.Google Scholar

James, P.M.A., Fortin, M.-J., Fall, A., Kneeshaw, D. & Messier, C. (2007). The effects of spatial legacies following shifting management practices and fire on boreal forest age structure. Ecosystems, 10, 1261–1277.Google Scholar

James, R., Croft, D.P. & Krause, J. (2009). Potential banana skins in animal social network analysis. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 989–997.Google Scholar

Jelínková, H., Tremblay, F. & DesRochers, A. (2009). Molecular and dendrochronological analyses of natural root grafting in Populus tremuloides (Salicaceae). American Journal of Botany, 96, 1500–1505; doi:10.3732/ajb.0800177.Google Scholar

Jiang, L.Q. & Zhang, W.J. (2015). Determination of keystone species in CSM food web: A topological analysis of network structure. Network Biology, 5, 13–33.Google Scholar

Johnson, S., Domínguez-García, V. & Muñoz, M.A. (2013). Factors determining nestedness in complex networks. PLoS ONE, 8 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074025.Google Scholar

Jones, D.A. (1966). On the polymorphism of cyanogenesis in Lotus corniculatus: Selection by animals. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 8, 556–567.Google Scholar

Joppa, L.N., Bascompte, J., Montoya, J.M., Solé, R.V., Sanderson, J. & Pimm, S.L. (2009). Reciprocal specialization in ecological networks. Ecology Letters, 12, 961–969; doi:101111/j.1461-0248.2009.01341.x.Google Scholar

Jordán, F. (2009). Keystone species and food webs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 364, 1733–1741.Google Scholar

Jordán, F., Liu, W.-C. & Davis, A.J. (2006). Topological keystone species: measures of positional importance in food webs. Oikos, 112, 535–546.Google Scholar

Jordán, F., Takács-Sánta, A. & Molnár, I. (1999). A reliability theoretical quest for keystones. Oikos, 86, 453–462.Google Scholar

Jordano, P. (1987). Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution. American Naturalist, 129, 657–677.Google Scholar

Jordano, P. (2010). Coevolution in multispecific interactions among free-living species. Evolution, Education, and Outreach, 3, 40–46.Google Scholar

Jordano, P., Bascompte, J. & Olesen, J.M. (2003). Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions. Ecology Letters, 6, 69–81.Google Scholar

Jordano, P., Bascompte, J. & Olesen, J.M. (2006). The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. In Waser, N.M. & Olleton, J. (eds), Plant-Pollinator Interactions, pp. 173–199. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Juenger, M. & Mutzel, P (2003). Graph Drawing Software. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Kampichler, C., Angeler, D.G., Holmes, R.T., Leito, A., Svensson, S., van der Jeungd, H.P. & Wesolowski, T. (2014). Temporal dynamics of bird community composition: an analysis of baseline conditions from long-term data. Oecologia, 175, 1301–1313; doi:10.1007/s00442-014-2979-6.Google Scholar

Karsai, M., Kivelä, M., Pan, R.K., Kaski, K., Kertész, J., Barabási, A.L. & Saramäki, J. (2011). Small but slow world: how network topology and burstiness slow down spreading. Physical Review E, 83, 025102. arXiv:1006.2125v3.Google Scholar

Katz, L. (1953). A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrica, 18, 39–43.Google Scholar

Keats, D.W., South, G.R. & Steele, D.H. (1985). Algal biomass and diversity in the upper subtidal at a pack-ice disturbed site in eastern Newfoundland. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 25, 151–163.Google Scholar

Keddy, P.A. & Shipley, B. (1989). Competitive hierarchies in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos, 54, 234–241.Google Scholar

Keeling, M.J. (1999). The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 859–867.Google Scholar

Keeling, M.J. (2005). The implications of network structure for epidemic dynamics. Theoretical Population Biology, 67, 1–8.Google Scholar

Keeling, M.J. & Eames, K.T.D. (2005). Networks and epidemic models. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2, 295–307; doi:10.1098/rsif.2005.0051.Google Scholar

Kéfi, S., Berlow, E.L., Wieters, E.A., Joppa, L.N., Wood, S.A., Brose, U. & Navarrete, S.A. (2015). Network structure beyond food webs: mapping non-trophic and trophic interactions on Chilean rocky shores. Ecology, 96, 291–303.Google Scholar

Keitt, T.H., Urban, D.L. & Milne, B.T. (1997). Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Ecology, 1, 4. www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art4/.Google Scholar

Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J. & Kumar, A. (2002). Connectivity and inference problems for temporal networks. Journal of Computer Systems Science, 64, 820–842.Google Scholar

Kent, M. & Coker, P. (1992). Vegetation Description and Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Kepner, J., Ricke, D.O. & Hutchison, D. (2013). Taming biological big data with D4M. Lincoln Laboratory Journal, 20, 82–91.Google Scholar

Kernighan, B.W. & Lin, S. (1970). An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs. Bell System Technical Journal, 49, 291–307.Google Scholar

Kim, H. & Anderson, R. (2012). Temporal node centrality in complex networks. Physical Review E, 85, 026107.Google Scholar

Kirchhoff, G. (1847). Über die Auflösung der Gleichungen. Annals of Physical Chemistry, 72, 497–508.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, D.G. & Radke, J.D. (1985). A framework for computational morphology. Computational Geometry, Machine Intelligence and Pattern Recognition, 2, 217–248.Google Scholar

Kisilevich, S., Mansmann, F., Nanni, M. & Rinzivillo, S. (2010). Spatio-temporal clustering: a survey. In Maimon, O. & Rokach, L. (eds), Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, pp. 855–874. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Kitching, R.L. (2000). Food Webs and Container Habitats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klovdahl, A.S. (1985). Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: the AIDS example. Social Science and Medicine, 21, 1203–1218.Google Scholar

Kneitel, J.M. & Miller, T.E. (2003). Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea L. inquilines. American Naturalist, 162, 165–171.Google Scholar

Kocarev, L. & Vattay, G. (2010). Complex Dynamics in Communication Networks. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Kolaczyk, E.D. (2009). Statistical Analysis of Network Data. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Kolaczyk, E.D. & Csárdi, G. (2014). Statistical Analysis of Network Data with R. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Kondoh, M., Kato, S. & Sakato, Y. (2010). Food webs are built up with nested subwebs. Ecology, 91, 3123–3130.Google Scholar

Kondor, R.I. & Lafferty, J. (2002). Diffusion kernels on graphs and other discrete input spaces. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).Google Scholar

Kondor, R., Shervashidze, N. & Borgwardt, K.M. (2009). The graphlet spectrum. Paper presented at the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning, Montreal.Google Scholar

Kost, C., de Oliveira, E.G., Knoch, T.A. & Wirth, R. (2005). Spatio-temporal permanence and plasticity of foraging trails in young and mature leaf-cutting ant colonies (Atta sp.). Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21, 677–688.Google Scholar

Kostakos, V. (2009). Temporal graphs. Physica A, 388, 1007–1023.Google Scholar

Kovanen, L., Karsai, M., Kaski, K., Kertész, J. & Saramäki, J. (2011). Temporal motifs in time-dependent networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 11, P11005; arXiv:1107.5646v2.Google Scholar

Kovanen, L., Karsai, M., Kaski, K., Kertész, J. & Saramäki, J. (2013a). Temporal motifs. In Holme, P. & Saramäki, J. (eds), Temporal Networks, pp. 119–134. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Kovanen, L., Kaski, K., Kertesz, J. & Saramäki, J. (2013b). Temporal motifs reveal homophily, gender-specific patterns, and group talk in call sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 18070–18075.Google Scholar

Krause, A.E., Frank, K.A., Mason, D.M., Ulanowicz, R.E. & Taylor, W.W. (2003). Compartments revealed in food-web structure. Nature, 426, 282–285.Google Scholar

Krause, J., Croft, D.P. & James, R. (2007). Social network theory in the behavioural sciences. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 15–27.Google Scholar

Krebs, C.J. (2010). Of lemmings and snowshoe hares: the ecology of northern Canada. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 278 doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1992.Google Scholar

Krebs, C.J., Boutin, S. & Boonstra, R. (2001). Ecosystem dynamics of the boreal forest: the Kluane project. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Krishna, A., Guimaräes, P.R., Jordano, P. & Bascompte, J. (2008). A neutral-niche theory of nestedness in mutualistic networks. Oikos, 117, 1609–1618; doi:10.1111/j.2008.0030-1299.16540.x.Google Scholar

Kunegis, J. (2014). Applications of structural balance in signed social networks. arXiv:1402.6865v1 [cs.S1].Google Scholar

Kunegis, J., Schmidt, S., Lommatzsch, A., Lerner, J., De Luca, E.W. & Albayrak, S. (2010). Spectral analysis of signed graphs for clustering, prediction, and visualization. In Proceedings of the 10th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 559–570. SIAM: Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar

Kurvers, R.H.J.M., Krause, J., Croft, D.P., Wilson, A.D.M. & Wolf, M. (2014). The evolutionary and ecological consequences of animal social networks: emerging issues. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 326–335Google Scholar

Labonne, J., Ravigné, V., Parisi, B. & Gaucherel, C. (2008). Linking dendritic network structures to population demogenetics: the downside of connectivity. Oikos, 117, 1479–1490.Google Scholar

Laird, R.A. & Schamp, B.S. (2006). Competitive intransitivity promotes species coexistence. American Naturalist, 168, 182–193.Google Scholar

Laird, R.A. & Schamp, B.S. (2008). Does local competition increase the coexistence of species in intransitive networks? Ecology, 89, 237–247.Google Scholar

Laita, A., Kotiaho, J.S. & Mönkkönen, M. (2011). Graph-theoretic connectivity measures: what do they tell us about connectivity? Landscape Ecology, 26, 951–967.Google Scholar

Lamour, A., Termorshuizen, A.J., Volker, D. & Jeger, M.J. (2007). Network formation by rhizomorphs of Armillaria lutea in natural soil: their description and ecological significance. FEMS Microbial Ecology, 62, 222–232.Google Scholar

Landau, H.G. (1951). On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effects of inherent characteristics. Bulletin of Mathematica Biophysics, 13, 1–19.Google Scholar

Lankau, R.A., Wheeler, E., Bennett, A.E. & Strauss, S.Y. (2010). Plant-soil feedbacks contribute to an intransitive competitive network that promotes genetic and species diversity. Journal of Ecology, 99 doi 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01736.x.Google Scholar

Lapointe, F.-J. & Legendre, P. (1990). A statistical framework to test the consensus of two nested classifications. Systematic Zoology, 39, 1–13.Google Scholar

Lapointe, F.-J. & Legendre, P. (1995). Comparison tests for dendrograms: a comparative evaluation. Journal of Classification, 12, 265–282.Google Scholar

Lawson, A.B. (2013). Bayesian Disease Mapping: Hierarchical Modeling in Spatial Epidemiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Layeghifard, M., Makarenkov, V. & Peres-Neto, P.R. (2015). Spatial and species compositional networks for inferring connectivity patterns in ecological communities. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24, 718–727.Google Scholar

Leal, W., Llanos, E.J., Retrepo, G., Suarez, C.F. & Patarrayo, M.E. (2016). How frequently do clusters occur in hierarchical clustering analysis? A graph theoretical approach to studying ties in proximity. Journal of Cheminformatics, 8 doi:10.1186/s13321-016-0114-x.Google Scholar

Lee, S.H., Kim, P.-J. & Jeong, H. (2006). Statistical properties of sampled networks. Physical Review E, 73 016102.Google Scholar

Legendre, P. (1993). Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 74, 1659–1673.Google Scholar

Legendre, P. & Fortin, M.-J. (1989). Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio, 80, 107–138.Google Scholar

Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (2012). Numerical Ecology. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Leibold, M.A. (2009). Spatial and metacommunity dynamics in biodiversity. In Levin, S.A. (ed.), The Princeton Guide to Ecology, pp. 312–319. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Leskovec, J. & Faloutsos, C. (2006). Sampling from large graphs. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 631–636. ACM: New York, USAGoogle Scholar

Leskovec, J., Huttenlocher, D. & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Signed networks in social media. Paper ACM 978-1-60558-929-9/10/04 presented at ACM CHI, Atlanta, GA, USA.Google Scholar

Lesne, A. (2006). Complex networks: from graph theory to biology. Letters in Mathematical Physics, 78, 235–262.Google Scholar

Levine, J.M. (1999). Indirect facilitation: evidence and predictions from a riparian community. Ecology, 80, 1762–1769.Google Scholar

Levinton, J.S. (1982). Marine Ecology. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Libralato, S., Christensen, V. & Pauly, D. (2006). A method for identifying keystone species in food web models. Ecological Modelling, 195, 153–171.Google Scholar

Liebhold, A., Koenig, W.D. & Bjørnstadt, O.N. (2004). Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, 35, 467–490.Google Scholar

Lihoreau, M., Raine, N.E., Reynolds, A.M., Stelzer, R.J., Lim, K.S., Smith, A.D., Osborne, J.L. & Chittka, L. (2013). Unravelling the mechanisms of trapline foraging in bees. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 6, e22701.Google Scholar

Little, L.R. & Dale, M.R.T. (1999). A method for analyzing spatio-temporal pattern in plant establishment, tested on a Populus balsamifera clone. Journal of Ecology, 87, 620–627.Google Scholar

Liu, W., Li, D., Wang, J., Xie, H., Zhu, Y. & He, F. (2009). Proteome-wide prediction of signal flow direction in protein interaction networks based on interacting domains. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 8, 2063–2070.Google Scholar

Loewe, K., Grueschow, M., Stoppel, C.M., Kruse, R. & Borgelt, C. (2014). Fast construction of voxel-level functional connectivity graphs. BMC Neuroscience, 15, 78; doi:10.1186/1471-2202-15-78.Google Scholar

Lomolino, M.V. (2006). Investigating causality of nestedness in insular communities: selective immigrations or extinctions. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 699–703.Google Scholar