Avbelj, M, and Komárek, J (eds), ‘Four Visions of Constitutional Pluralism – Symposium Transcript’ 2 European Journal of Legal Studies 44Google Scholar

Bako, B, ‘The Zauberlehrling Unchained? The Recycling of the German Federal Constitutional Court’s Case Law on Identity-, Ultra Vires-, and Fundamental Rights Review in Hungary’ (2018) 78 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 864Google Scholar

Baranski, Marcin, Bastos, Filipe Brito, and Brink, Martijn van den, ‘Unquestioned supremacy still begs the question’ Verfassungsblog (29 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/unquestioned-supremacy-still-begs-the-question/Google Scholar

Bayer, L, and Wanat, Z, ‘EU Top Court’s Authority Challenged by Poland and Hungary’ POLITICO (13 May 2020) politico.eu/article/ecj-authority-challenged-by-poland-and-hungary/Google Scholar

Belavusau, Uladzislau and Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra (eds) Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History (Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Blokker, P, ‘Populism as a Constitutional Project’ (2019) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 536Google Scholar

Castillo-Ortiz, P, ‘The Illiberal Abuse of Constitutional Courts in Europe’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 48Google Scholar

Chancellery of the Prime Minister, ‘White Paper on the Reform of the Polish Judiciary’ (2018) premier.gov.pl/files/files/white_paper_en_full.pdfGoogle Scholar

Corrias, L, ‘Populism in a Constitutional Key: Constituent Power, Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Identity’ (2016) 12 European Constitutional Law Review 6Google Scholar

Cruz, J B, ‘The Legacy of the Maastricht-Urteil and the Pluralist Movement’ (2008) 14 European Law Journal 389CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruz, J B, ‘Legal Pluralism and Institutional Disobedience in the European Union’ in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds) Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

Cruz, J B, ‘Another Look at Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union’ (2016) 22 European Law Journal 356CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drinóczi, T, and Bień-Kacała, A, ‘Illiberal Constitutionalism: The Case of Hungary and Poland’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 1140Google Scholar

Eijsbouts, W T, ‘Wir Sind Das Volk: Notes about the Notion of “The People” as Occasioned by the Lissabon-Urteil’ (2010) 6 European Constitutional Law Review 199Google Scholar

Fabbrini, F, ‘After the OMT Case: The Supremacy of EU Law as the Guarantee of the Equality of the Member States The CJEU’s OMT Decision’ (2015) 16 German Law Journal 1003Google Scholar

Gersdorf, M, ‘Speech to Mark the Occasion of the Conference Organised by the Federal Court of Germany (Bundesgerichtshof): Polish Rule of Law: Missed Opportunities?’ (19 July 2018) sn.pl/aktualnosci/SiteAssets/Lists/Wydarzenia/NewForm/Wyst%C4%85pienie%20PPSN%20w%20Karlsruhe%20-%20wersja%20ang.pdfGoogle Scholar

Gessler, T, ‘The 2016 Referendum in Hungary’ (2017) 45 East European Quarterly 85Google Scholar

Graber, M A, Levinson, S and Tushnet, M (eds) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar

Häberle, P, ‘Die Entwicklungsstufe Des Heutigen Verfassungsstaates - Paradigmen, Verfassungsthemen, Textstufen Und Tendenzen in Der Weltstunde Des Verfassungsstaates’ [The developmental stage of today’s constitutional state – Paradigms, themes, and tendencies in the global hour of the constitutional state] (1991) 22 Rechtstheorie 431Google Scholar

Halmai, G, ‘Abuse of Constitutional Identity: The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2018) 43 Review of Central and East European Law 23Google Scholar

Halmai, G, ‘Populism, Authoritarianism and Constitutionalism’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 296Google Scholar

Kelemen, R D, ‘On the Unsustainability of Constitutional Pluralism: European Supremacy and the Survival of the Eurozone’ (2016) 23 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 136Google Scholar

Kelemen, R D, ‘The Dangers of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Davies, Gareth and Avbelj, Matej (eds) Research Handbook on Legal Pluralism and EU Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018)Google Scholar

Kelemen, R D, Eeckhout, Piet, Fabbrini, Federico, and Pech, Laurent, ‘National Courts Cannot Override CJEU Judgments: A Joint Statement in Defense of the EU Legal Order’ Verfassungsblog (26 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/national-courts-cannot-override-cjeu-judgments/Google Scholar

Kelemen, R D, and Pech, L, ‘The Uses and Abuses of Constitutional Pluralism: Undermining the Rule of Law in the Name of Constitutional Identity in Hungary and Poland’ (2019) 21 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 59Google Scholar

Koncewicz, T T, ‘On the Politics of Resentment, Mis-Memory, and Constitutional Fidelity: The Demise of the Polish Overlapping Consensus?’ in Belavusau, Uladzislau and Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra (eds) Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History (Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Könczöl, M, ‘Dealing with the Past in and around the Fundamental Law of Hungary’ in Belavusau, Uladzislau and Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra (eds) Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History (Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Kovács, K, and Tóth, G A, ‘Hungary’s Constitutional Transformation’ (2011) 7 European Constitutional Law Review 183Google Scholar

Krastev, I, ‘Is East-Central Europe Backsliding? The Strange Death of the Liberal Consensus’ (2007) 18 Journal of Democracy 56Google Scholar

Kumm, M, ‘Who Is the Final Arbiter of Constitutionality in Europe?: Three Conceptions of the Relationship between the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice’ (1999) 36 Common Market Law Review 351Google Scholar

Kumm, M, ‘The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty’ (2005) 11 European Law Journal 262Google Scholar

Kumm, M, ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State’ in Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P (eds) Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Kumm, M, ‘Rethinking Constitutional Authority: On the Structure and Limits of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds) Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

Landau, D, ‘Abusive Constitutionalism’ (2013) 47 UC Davis Law Review 189Google Scholar

Lawrence, J C, ‘Constitutional Pluralism’s Unspoken Normative Core’ (2019) 21 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 24Google Scholar

Lindahl, H, ‘The Purposiveness of Law: Two Concepts of Representation in the European Union’ (1998) 17 Law and Philosophy 481Google Scholar

Lindahl, H, ‘Constituent Power and Reflexive Identity: Towards an Ontology of Collective Selfhood’ in Walker, Neil and Loughlin, Martin (eds) The Paradox of Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Loughlin, M, ‘In Defence of Staatslehre’ (2009) 48 Der Staat 1Google Scholar

Loughlin, M, ‘On Constituent Power’ in Dowdle, Michael W and Wilkinson, Michael A (eds) Constitutionalism beyond Liberalism (Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Loughlin, M, and Walker, N, The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

MacCormick, N, ‘The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now’ (1995) 1 European Law Journal 259Google Scholar

MacCormick, N, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Maduro, M P, ‘Contrapunctual Law: Europe’s Constitutional Pluralism in Action’ in Walker, Neil (ed) Sovereignty in Transition (Hart, 2003)Google Scholar

Maduro, M P, ‘Three Claims of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds) Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

Mayer, F C, ‘Auf dem Weg zum Richterfaustrecht?’ [Towards a judicial rule of force?] Verfassungsblog (7 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/auf-dem-weg-zum-richterfaustrecht/Google Scholar

Möllers, C, ‘We Are (Afraid of) the People: Constituent Power in German Constitutionalism’ in Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil (eds) The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Mudde, C, ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’ (2004) 39 Government and Opposition 541Google Scholar

Mudde, C, ‘Are Populists Friends or Foes of Constitutionalism?’ (Policy Brief, Foundation for Law, Justice, and Society, 29 October 2013) fljs.org/content/are-populists-friends-or-foes-constitutionalismGoogle Scholar

Mueller, J-W, ‘Populism and Constitutionalism’ in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Orbán, V, ‘Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Speech at the 25th Bálványos Summer Free University and Student Camp’ 2010-2015.miniszterelnok.hu/in_english_article/_prime_minister_viktor_orban_s_speech_at_the_25th_balvanyos_summer_free_university_and_student_campGoogle Scholar

Perju, V, ‘On the (De-)Fragmentation of Statehood in Europe: Reflections on Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde’s Work on European Integration’ (2018) 19 German Law Journal 403Google Scholar

Popper, K R, The Open Society and Its Enemies: New One-Volume Edition (Princeton University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Roughan, N, Authorities: Conflicts, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar

Sadurski, W, Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Sajó, A, and Uitz, R, The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Scheppele, K L, ‘Autocratic Legalism’ (2018) 85 University of Chicago Law Review 545Google Scholar

Scholtes, J, ‘Abusing Constitutional Identity’ [2021] German Law Journal (forthcoming) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3698001Google Scholar

Schönberger, C, ‘Identitäterä: Verfassungsidentität zwischen Widerstandsformel und Musealisierung des Grundgesetzes’ [Constitutional Identity between formula for resistance and the museification of the Basic Law] (2015) 63 Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 41Google Scholar

Slaughter, A-M, ‘A Global Community of Courts’ (2003) 44 Harvard International Law Journal 191Google Scholar

Subotic, J, Yellow Star, Red Star: Holocaust Remembrance After Communism (Cornell University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Tripkovic, B, The Metaethics of Constitutional Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Tushnet, M, and Bugarič, B, ‘Populism and Constitutionalism: An Essay on Definitions and Their Implications’ (Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 20-17, Harvard Law School, 12 June 2020) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3581660Google Scholar

Vergara, C, ‘Populism as Plebeian Politics: Inequality, Domination, and Popular Empowerment’ (2020) 28 Journal of Political Philosophy 222Google Scholar

Walker, N, ‘Flexibility Within a Metaconstitutional Frame: Reflections on the Future of Legal Authority in Europe’ in Burca, Grainne de and Scott, Joanne (eds) Constitutional Change in the EU: From Uniformity to Flexibility? (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar

Walker, N, ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 317Google Scholar

Walker, N, ‘Constitutionalism and Pluralism in Global Context’ in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds) Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

Walker, N, ‘Populism and Constitutional Tension’ (2019) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 515Google Scholar

Weiler, J H H, ‘In Defence of the Status Quo: Europe’s Constitutional Sonderweg’ in Wind, Marlene and Weiler, Joseph (eds) European Constitutionalism Beyond the State (Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Weiler, J H H, ‘On the Power of the Word: Europe’s Constitutional Iconography’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 173Google Scholar

Wilkinson, M A, ‘Constitutional Pluralism: Chronicle of a Death Foretold?’ (2017) 23 European Law Journal 213Google Scholar

Albi, A, ‘Postmodern versus Retrospective Sovereignty: Two Different Discourses in the EU and the Candidate Countries’ in Walker, Neil (ed) Sovereignty in Transition (Hart 2003)Google Scholar

Albi, A, EU Enlargement and the Constitutions of Central and Eastern Europe (Cambridge University Press 2009)Google Scholar

Avbelj, M, ‘The Right Question about the FCC Ultra Vires Decision’ Verfassungsblog (6 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/the-right-question-about-the-fcc-ultra-vires-decision/Google Scholar

Baer, S, ‘The Rule of – and Not by Any – Law: On Constitutionalism’ (2018) 71(1) Current Legal Problems 335Google Scholar

Blokker, P, ‘Populism as Constitutional Project’ (2019) 17(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 535Google Scholar

Blokker, P, Bugarič, B, and Halmai, G, ‘Introduction: Populist Constitutionalism: Varieties, Complexities, and Contradictions’ (2019) 20(3) German Law Journal 291Google Scholar

Canovan, M, ‘Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy’ in Meny, Y and Surel, Y (eds) Democracies and the Populist Challenge (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012)Google Scholar

Cappelletti, M and Golay, D, ‘Judicial Branch in the Federal and Transnational Union’ in Cappelletti, M, Seccombe, M and Weiler, J H H (eds) Integration Trough Law (Ashgate, 1986)Google Scholar

Corrales, J, ‘The Authoritarian Resurgence: Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela’ (2015) 26(2) Journal of Democracy 37Google Scholar

Corrias, L, ‘Populism in a Constitutional Key: Constituent Power, Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Identity’ (2016) 12(1) European Constitutional Law Review 6Google Scholar

Czarnota, A, ‘The Constitutional Tribunal’ Verfassubsblog (3 June 2017) verfassungsblog.de/the-constitutional-tribunalGoogle Scholar

Dani, Marco, Mendes, Joana, Menendez, Agustín José, and Wilkinson, Michael ‘At the End of the Law: A Moment of Truth for the Eurozone and the EU’ Verfassungsblog (15 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/at-the-end-of-the-law/Google Scholar

Dixon, R, ‘Introduction – Public Law and Populism’ (2019) 20(2) German Law Journal 125Google Scholar

Fabbrini, F, and Pollicino, O, ‘Constitutional Identity in Italy: Institutional Disagreements at a Time of Political Change’ in Callies, C and Schyff, G van der (eds) Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Faraguna, P, ‘Il Bundesverfassungsgericht e l’Unione Europea, tra principio di apertura e controlimiti’ [Il Bundesverfassungsgericht and European Union, between the principle of openness and counterlimits] (2016) Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 431Google Scholar

Fournier, T, ‘From Rhetoric to Action: A Constitutional Analysis of Populism’ (EUI Working Paper 08/2018, European University Institute) cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/51725Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T, and Huq, A A, How to Save a Constitutional Democracy (Chicago University Press, 2018)Google Scholar

Halmai, G, ‘Abuse of Constitutional Identity: The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2018) 43(1) Review of Central and East European Law 222Google Scholar

Halmai, G, and Scheppele, K L, ‘Orbán is Still the Sole Judge of his Own Law’ Verfassungsblog (30 April 2020) verfassungsblog.de/orban-is-still-the-sole-judge-of-his-own-law/Google Scholar

Huq, A, and Ginsburg, T, ‘How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy’ (2018) 65 UCLA Law Review 78Google Scholar

Kallis, A, ‘Populism, Sovereigntism, and the Unlikely Re-Emergence of the Territorial Nation-State’ (2018) 11(3) Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 285Google Scholar

Kovács, K, ‘Hungary’s Orbánistan: A Complete Arsenal of Emergency Powers’ Verfassungsblog (6 April 2020) verfassungsblog.de/hungarys-orbanistan-a-complete-arsenal-of-emergency-powers/Google Scholar

Krunke, H, and Klinge, S, ‘The Danish Ajos Case: The Missing Case from Maastricht to Lisbon’ (2018) 3(1) European Papers 157Google Scholar

Krygier, M, ‘The Challenge of Institutionalisation: Post-Communist “Transitions”, Populism, and the Rule of Law’ (2019) 15(3) European Constitutional Law Review 544Google Scholar

Krygier, M, ‘The Rule of Law: Legality, Teleology, Sociology’ in Palombella, G and Walker, N (eds) Re-locating the Rule of Law (Hart 2008)Google Scholar

Krygier, M, ‘The Rule of Law: Pasts, Presents, and Two Possible Futures’ (2016) 12 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 199Google Scholar

Lakoff, G, and Johnson, M, Philosophy in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind & Its Challenge to Western Thought (Basic Books, 1999)Google Scholar

Landau, D, ‘Abusive Constitutionalism’ (2013) 47 UC Davis Law Review 189Google Scholar

Lustig, D, and Weiler, J H H, ‘Judicial Review in the Contemporary World — Retrospective and Prospective’ (2018) 16(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 315Google Scholar

Madsen, M R, Olsen, H P, and Šadl, U, ‘Legal Disintegration? The Ruling of the Danish Supreme Court in AJOS’ Verfassungsblog (30 January 2017) verfassungsblog.de/legal-disintegration-the-ruling-of-the-danish-supreme-court-in-ajos/Google Scholar

Mancini, G F, ‘Attivismo e autocontrollo nella giurisprudenza della Corte di giustizia’ [Activism and self-control in the case law of the European Court of Justice] (1990) 30 Rivista Diritto Europeo 233Google Scholar

Martinico, G, and Baraggia, A, ‘Who Is the Master of the Treaties? The Compact Theory in Karlsruhe’ Diritti Comparati (15 May 2020) diritticomparati.it/who-is-the-master-of-the-treaties-the-compact-theory-in-karlsruhe/Google Scholar

Martinico, G, and Pollicino, O, The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems: Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws (Edward Elgar, 2012)Google Scholar

Martinico, G, ‘Between Mimesis and Parasitism: Italian Populism in a Comparative Perspective’ (2020) 26(4) European Public Law 921Google Scholar

Marzal, T, ‘Is the BVerfG PSPP Decision “Simply Not Comprehensible”? A Critique of the Judgment’s Reasoning on Proportionality’ Verfassungsblog (9 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/is-the-bverfg-pspp-decision-simply-not-comprehensible/Google Scholar

Morelli, Alessandro, and Pollicino, Oreste, ‘Metaphors, Judicial Frames and Fundamental Rights in Cyberspace’ (2020) 68(3) American Journal of Comparative Law 616Google Scholar

Mudde, C, ‘Are Populists Friends or Foes of Constitutionalism?’ (Policy Brief, Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, 2013) fljs.org/sites/www.fljs.org/files/publications/Mudde_0.pdfGoogle Scholar

Müller, J W, ‘Populism and Constitutionalism’ in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Palombella, G, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Core’ in Palombella, G and Walker, N (eds) Re-locating the Rule of Law (Hart, 2008)Google Scholar

Pitruzzella, G, Pollicino, O, and Bassini, M (eds) Corti europee e democrazia: Rule of law, indipendenza e accountability [European Courts and Democracy: Rule of law, independence and accountability] (Egea, 2019)Google Scholar

Poiares, Maduro M, ‘Some Preliminary Remarks on the PSPP Decision of the German Constitutional Court’ Verfassungsblog (6 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/some-preliminary-remarks-on-the-pspp-decision-of-the-german-constitutional-courtGoogle Scholar

Pollicino, O, ‘Metaphors and Identity Based Narrative in Constitutional Adjudication: When Judicial Dominance Matters’ IACL-AIDC Blog (27 February 2019) blog-iacl-aidc.org/2019-posts/2019/2/27/metaphors-and-identity-based-narrative-in-constitutional-adjudication-when-judicial-dominance-mattersGoogle Scholar

Pollicino, O, and Repetto, G, ‘Not to be Pushed Aside: the Italian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice’ Verfassungsblog (27 February 2019) verfassungsblog.de/not-to-be-pushed-aside-the-italian-constitutional-court-and-the-european-court-of-justice/Google Scholar

Sadurski, W, ‘Constitutionalization of the EU and the Sovereignty Concerns of the new Accession States: The Role of the Charter of Rights’ (EUI Working Paper Law, No. 2003/11, European University Institute, 2003) cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/1363/law03–11.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar

Sadurski, W, ‘Accession’s Democracy Dividend: the Impact of the EU Enlargement upon Democracy in the New Member States of Central and Eastern Europe’ (2004) 10(4) European Law Journal 371Google Scholar

Sadurski, W, ‘How Democracy Dies (in Poland): A Case Study of Anti-Constitutional Populist Backsliding in Poland’ (Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 18/01, University of Sydney, January 2018) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3103491#Google Scholar

Sadurski, W, Czarnota, A, and Krygier, M (eds) Spreading Democracy and the Rule of Law?: The Impact of EU Enlargement for the Rule of Law, Democracy and Constitutionalism in Post-Communist Legal Orders (Springer, 2006)Google Scholar

Scheppele, K L, ‘Autocratic Legalism’ (2018) 85 University of Chicago Law Review 545Google Scholar

Scheppele, K L, ‘Orbán’s Emergency’ Verfassungsblog (29 March 2020) verfassungsblog.de/orbans-emergency/Google Scholar

Sólyom, L, ‘Constitutional Justice, Some Comparative Remarks’ (Paper presented at Conference on ‘Constitutional Justice and the Rule of Law’ on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the Constitutional Court of Lithuania, Vilnius, 4–5 September 2003) venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-JU(2003)030-eGoogle Scholar

Sólyom, L, ‘The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Transition to Democracy’ (2003) 18(1) International Sociology 133Google Scholar

Urbinati, N, ‘Democracy and Populism’ (1998) 5(1) Constellations 111Google Scholar

Varol, O O, ‘Stealth Autoritharianism’ (2015) 100 Iowa Law Review 1673Google Scholar

Walker, N, ‘Populism and Constitutional Tension’ (2019)17(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 515Google Scholar

Weiler, J H H, ‘Federalism and Constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg’ in Nicolaidis, Kalypso and Howse, Robert (eds) The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Winter, S L, A Clearing in the Forest Law, Life and Mind (University of Chicago Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Zakaria, F, ‘The Rise of Illiberal Democracy’ (1997) 76(6) Foreign Affairs 22Google Scholar

Adam, S and Elsuwege, P Van, ‘L’exigence d’indépendance du juge, paradigm de l’Union européenne comme union de droit’, [The requirement of independence of the judiciary, paradigm of the European Union as a union of law] (2018) 9 Journal de droit européen 334Google Scholar

Adamski, D, ‘The Social Contract of Democratic Backsliding in the “New EU” Countries’ (2019) 56 Common Market Law Review 623Google Scholar

Baratta, R, ‘La communauté de valeurs dans l’ordre juridique de l’Union européenne’ [The community of values in the juridical order of the European Union] (2018) 1 Revue des affaires européennes 81Google Scholar

Bárd, P, and Sledzinska-Simon, A, ‘On the Principle of Irremovability of Judges beyond Age Discrimination: Commission v. Poland’ (2020) 57(5) Common Market Law Review 1555Google Scholar

‘Bialowieza: Poland to Resume Logging in Primeval Forest’ BBC News (9 March 2021) bbc.com/news/world-europe-56341837Google Scholar

Bignami, F, (ed), EU Law in Populist Times (Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Blokker, P, ‘Populist Counter-Constitutionalism, Conservatism, and Legal Fundamentalism’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 519Google Scholar

Blokker, P, ‘Building Democracy by Legal Means? The Contestation of Human Rights and Constitutionalism in East-Central Europe’ (2020) 18 Journal of Modern European History 335Google Scholar

Bogdanowicz, P, and Taborowski, M, ‘How to Save a Supreme Court in a Rule of Law Crisis: The Polish Experience: ECJ (Grand Chamber) 24 June 2019, Case C-619/18, European Commission v Republic of Poland’ (2020) 16(2) European Constitutional Law Review 306Google Scholar

Castillo-Ortiz, P, ‘The Illiberal Abuse of Constitutional Courts’ (2019) 15(1) European Constitutional Law Review 48Google Scholar

Closa, C, ‘Reinforcing of EU Monitoring of the Rule of Law’ in Closa, C and Kochenov, D (eds) Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Closa, C, and Kochenov, D (eds) Reinforcing the Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Closa, C, Kochenov, D and Weiler, J H H, ‘Reinforcing the Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union’ (EUI RSCAS Research Paper 2014/25, 2014)Google Scholar

Dimitrovs, A, and Kochenov, D, ‘Of Jupiters and Bulls: CVM as a Redundant Special Regime of the Rule of Law – Romanian Judges’ EU Law Live (5 June 2021)Google Scholar

Douglas-Scott, S, ‘Justice, Injustice and the Rule of Law in the EU’ in Kochenov, D, de Búrca, G, and Williams, A (eds) Europe’s Justice Deficit? (Hart, 2015)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R, ‘A New Philosophy of International Law’ (2013) 41 Philosophy and Public Affairs 2Google Scholar

Eeckhout, P, ‘Opinion 2/13 on EU Accession to the ECHR and Judicial Dialogue – Autonomy or Autarky?’ (2015) 38 Fordham International Law Journal 955Google Scholar

Frost, R, ‘Poland Set to Resume Logging in One of Europe’s Last Primeval Forests’ Euronews (15 March 2021) euronews.com/green/2021/03/12/poland-set-to-resume-logging-in-one-of-europe-s-last-primeval-forestsGoogle Scholar

Gajda-Roszczynialska, K, and Markiewicz, K, ‘Disciplinary Proceedings as an Instrument for Breaking the Rule of Law in Poland’ (2020) 12 Hague Journal on the Rule Law 451Google Scholar

Georgiev, D, ‘Politics or Rule of Law: Deconstruction and Legitimacy in International Law’ (1993) 4 European Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Halmái, G, ‘The Early Retirement Age of Hungarian Judges’ in Nicola, F and Davies, B (eds) EU Law Stories (Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Jakab, A, and Kochenov, D (eds) The Enforcement of EU Law and Values (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Janse, R, De renaissance van de Rechtsstaat [The Renaissance of the Rule of Law] Open Universiteit (24 September 2018) ou.nl/-/oratie-ronald-janse-de-renaissance-van-de-rechtsstaat-Google Scholar

Kalinichenko, P, and Kochenov, D, ‘Introductory Note to Amendments to the 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation Concerning International Law (2021)’ (2021) 60(2) International Legal Materials 341Google Scholar

Klamert, M, and Kochenov, D, ‘Article 2 TEU’ in Kellerbauer, M, Klamert, M, and Tomkin, J (eds) The Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights – A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, ‘Behind the Copenhagen Façade: The Meaning and Structure of the Copenhagen Criterion of Democracy and the Rule of Law’ (2004) 8(10) European Integration Online Papers 1Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, ‘Declaratory Rule of Law: Self-Constitution through Unenforceable Promises’ in Přibáň, J (ed) The Self-Constitution of European Society beyond EU Politics, Law and Governance (Routledge, 2016)Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, ‘The Acquis and Its Principles: The Enforcement of “Law” versus the Enforcement of “Values” in the European Union’ in Jakab, A and Kochenov, D (eds) The Enforcement of EU Law and Values (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, ‘EU Law without the Rule of Law: Is the Veneration of Autonomy Worth It?’ (2019) 34 Yearbook of European Law 74Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, ‘De Facto Power Grab in Context: Upgrading Rule of Law in Europe in Populist Times’ (2020) XL Polish Yearbook of International Law 197.Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, ‘Rule of Law as a Tool to Claim Supremacy’ in Jakub Urbanik and Adam Bodnar (eds) Περιμένοντας τους Bαρβάρους Law in the days of Constitutional Crisis: Studies offered to Mirosław Wyrzykowski (C H Beck/Nomos, 2021)Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, and Bárd, P, ‘The Last Soldier Standing? Courts versus Politicians and the Rule of Law Crisis in the New Member States of the EU’ (2019) 1 European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 243Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, and Butler, G, ‘CJEU’s Independence and Lawful Composition in Question (Part V)’ Verfassungsblog (19 June 2021) verfassungsblog.de/cjeus-independence-and-lawful-composition-in-question-part-v/Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, and Butler, G, ‘The Independence and Lawful Composition of the Court of Justice of the European Union: Replacement of Advocate General Sharpston and the Battle for the Integrity of the Institution’ (Jean Monnet Working Papers No. 2/2020, 2020) jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/paper-serie/Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, and Butler, G, ‘Independence of the Court of Justice of the European Union: Unchecked Member States’ Power after the Sharpston Affair’ (2022) 28 European Law Journal (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, and Dimitrovs, A, ‘Solving the Copenhagen Dilemma: The Repubblika Decision of the European Court of Justice’ Verfassungsblog (28 April 2021) verfassungsblog.de/solving-the-copenhagen-dilemma/Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, Magen, A and Pech, L, ‘The Great Rule of Law Debate in the EU’ (2016) 54 Journal of Common Market Studies 1043Google Scholar

Kochenov, D, and Morijn, J, ‘Strengthening the Charter’s Role in the Fight for the Rule of Law in the EU,’ (2021) 27 European Public Law (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Koncewicz, T T, ‘Of Institutions, Democracy, Constitutional Self-Defence, and the Rule of Law’ (2016) 53 Common Market Law Review 1753Google Scholar

Koncewicz, T T, ‘The Capture of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and Beyond: Of Institution(s), Fidelities and the Rule of Law in Flux’ (2018) 43 Review of Central and East European Law 116Google Scholar

Koncewicz, T T, ‘The Supranational Rule of Law as First Principle of the European Public Space – On the Journey in Ever Closer Union among the Peoples of Europe in Flux’ (2020) 5 Palestra 167Google Scholar

Kosař, D, Baroš, J and Dufek, P, ‘The Twin Challenges to Separation of Powers in Central Europe: Technocratic Governance and Populism’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 427Google Scholar

Kovács, K, and Scheppele, K L, ‘The Fragility of an Independent Judiciary: Lessons from Hungary and Poland – and the European Union’ (2018) 51(3) Communist and Post-Communist Studies 189Google Scholar

Krajewski, M, and Ziółkowski, M, ‘EU Judicial Independence Decentralized: A.K.’ (2020) 57(4) Common Market Law Review 1107Google Scholar

Kumm, M, ‘The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification’ (2010) 4 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 142Google Scholar

Lacey, N, ‘Populism and the Rule of Law’ (2019) 15(1) Annual Review of Law and Social Science 79Google Scholar

Lashyn, S ‘The Unsuccessful Bid of the British Advocate-General to Remain on the Bench Despite Brexit’ (2021) 84 Modern Law Review onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1468-2230.12651Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K, ‘The Basic Constitutional Charter of a Community Based on the Rule of Law’ in Poiares Maduro, M and Azoulai, L (eds) The Past and the Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K, ‘Our Judicial Independence and the Quest for National, Supranational and Transntional Justice’ in Sevik, G, Clifton, M-J, Haas, T, Lourenço, L and Schwiesow, K (eds) The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher (Springer, 2019)Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K, ‘New Horizons for the Rule of Law within the EU’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 29Google Scholar

Leloup, M, ‘The ECtHR Steps into the Ring: The Xero Flor Ruling as the ECtHR’s First Step in Fighting Rule of Law Backsliding’ Verfassungsblog (10 May 2021) verfassungsblog.de/the-ecthr-steps-into-the-ring/Google Scholar

Leloup, M, Kochenov, D, and Dimitrovs, A, ‘Non-Regression: Opening the Door to Solving the “Copenhagen Dilemma”? All Eyes on Case C-896/19 Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru’ (2021) 48 European Law Review 692.Google Scholar

Lindeboom, J, ‘Why EU Law Claims Supremacy’ (2018) 38 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 328Google Scholar

Mayer, F C, ‘Multilevel Constitutional Jurisdiction’ in von Bogdandy, A and Bast, J (eds) Principles of European Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Müller, J-W, ‘Populism and Constitutionalism’ in Kaltwasser, C R, Taggart, P, Espejo, PO, and Ostiguy, P (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Palombella, G, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Core’ in Palombella, G and Walker, N (eds) Relocating the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Palombella, G, ‘The Rule of Law as an Institutional Ideal’ in Morlino, L and Palombella, G (eds) Rule of Law and Democracy: Inquiries into Internal and External Issues (Brill, 2010)Google Scholar

Palombella, G, È possibile una legalità globale? Il rule of law e la governance del mondo [Is global legality possible? The rule of law and world governance] (Il Mulino, 2012)Google Scholar

Palombella, G, ‘The Principled, and Winding, Road to Al-Dulimi: Interpreting the Interpreters’ (2014) 6 Questions of International Law Zoom-in 15Google Scholar

Palombella, G, ‘Beyond Legality–before Democracy: Rule of Law Caveats in the EU Two-Level System’ in Closa, C and Kochenov, D (eds) Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Pech, L, ‘The Rule of Law as a Constitutional Principle of the European Union’ (Jean Monnet Working Paper Series No 4/2009, 28 April 2009)Google Scholar

Pech, L, ‘Dealing with ‘Fake Judges’ under EU Law: Poland as a Case Study in Light of the Court of Justice’s Ruling of 26 March 2020 in Simpson and HG’ (RECONNECT Working Paper 8, 2020)Google Scholar

Pech, L, ‘The Schrödinger’s Advocate General,’ Verfassungsblog (29 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/the-schroedingers-advocate-generalGoogle Scholar

Pech, L, ‘Article 47(2)’ in Peers, Steve, Hervey, Tamara, Kenner, Jeff, and Ward, Angela (eds) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (2nd ed., Hart Publishing, 2021)Google Scholar

Pech, L, ‘Court of Justice Protecting Polish judges from Poland’s Disciplinary “Star Chamber”: Commission v. Poland (Interim proceedings)’ (2021) 58(1) Common Market Law Review 137Google Scholar

Pech, L, ‘Written Submission in Response to the Rule of Law Call by the Joint Committee on European Union Affairs of the Houses of the Oireachtas’ (RECONNECT Policy Brief, 22 January 2021) reconnect-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Policy-brief-LP-written-submission-in-response-to-the-call-22JAN21_update.pdfGoogle Scholar

Pech, L, and Grogan, J (eds) ‘Unity and Diversity in National Understandings of the Rule of Law in the EU’ (RECONNECT Deliverable 7.1, 30 April 2020) reconnect-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/D7.1-1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Pech, P, and Grogan, J (eds), ‘The Meaning and Scope of EU Rule of Law’ (Report, RECONNECT Deliverable 7.2, 2020) reconnect-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/D7.2-1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Pech, L, and Kochenov, D, ‘Respect for the Rule of Law in the Case-Law of the Court of Justice: A Casebook Overview of the Key Judgments since the Portuguese Judges Case’ (Report, SIEPS: Svenska institutet för europapolitiska studier, 2021)Google Scholar

Pech, L, and Platon, S, ‘Judicial Independence under Threat: The Court of Justice to the Rescue in the ASJP Case’ (2018) 55(6) Common Market Law Review 1827Google Scholar

Pech, L, and Scheppele, K L, ‘Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU’ (2017) 19 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 3Google Scholar

Pech, L, Wachowiec, P and Mazur, D, ‘Poland’s Rule of Law Breakdown: A Five-Year Assessment of EU’s (In)Action’ (2021) 13 Hague Journal on the Rule Law 1Google Scholar

Prete, L, and Smulders, B, ‘The Age of Maturity of Infringement Proceedings’ (2021) 58(2) Common Market Law Review 285Google Scholar

Rizcallah, C, and Davio, V, ‘L’article 19 du Traité sur l’Union européenne: sesame de l’Union de droit’ [‘Article 19 of the Treaty on European Union: open sesame to a legal union’] (2020) 122 Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme 155Google Scholar

Rossi, L S, ‘La valeur juridique des valeurs: L’article 2 TEU’ [The legal value of values: Article 2 of the TEU’] (2020) 3 Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 639Google Scholar

Sadurski, W, Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Sadurski, W, Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Sadurski, W, ‘Populism and Human Rights in Poland’ in Neuman, G L (ed) Human Rights in a Time of Populism: Challenges and Responses (Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Sajó, A, Ruling by Cheating (Cambridge University Press, 2021)Google Scholar

Scheppele, K L, ‘Constitutional Coups and Judicial Review: How Transnational Institutions Can Strengthen Peak Courts at Times of Crisis (with Special Reference to Hungary)’ (2014) 23 Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 51Google Scholar

Scheppele, K L, ‘Autocratic Legalism’ (2018) 85 University of Chicago Law Review 545Google Scholar

Scheppele, K L, Kochenov, D and Grabowska-Moroz, B, ‘EU Values Are Law, after All: Enforcing EU Values through Systemic Infringement Actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union’ (2020) 39 Yearbook of European Law 3Google Scholar

Schout, A, and Luining, M, ‘The Missing Dimension in Rule of Law Policy from EU Policies to Multilevel Capacity Building’ (Clingendael Report, Netherlands Institute of International Relations, January 2018)Google Scholar

Sillen, J, ‘The Concept of “Internal Judicial Independence”’ (2019) 15(1) European Constitutional Law Review 104Google Scholar

Van Elsuwege, P, and Grimmelprez, F, ‘Protecting the Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order: A Constitutional Role for the Court of Justice’ (2020) 16(1) European Constitutional Law Review 8Google Scholar

Venice Commission, ‘Opinion on the Act on the Constitutional Tribunal’, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 108th Plenary Session, (Venice, 14–15 October 2016)Google Scholar

Venice Commission, ‘Rule of Law Checklist’, Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 106th Plenary Session (Venice, 11–12 March 2016)Google Scholar

von Danwitz, T, ‘Values and the Rule of Law: Foundations of the European Union – An Inside Perspective from the ECJ’ (2018) 21 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 2Google Scholar

Weiler, J H H, and Lockhart, N J S, ‘“Taking Rights Seriously” Seriously: The European Court and Its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence – Part I’ (1995) 32(1) Common Market Law Review 51Google Scholar

Weiler, J H H, and Lockhart, N J S, ‘“Taking Rights Seriously” Seriously: The European Court and Its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence – Part II’ (1995) 32(2) Common Market Law Review 579Google Scholar

Wennerås, P, ‘Saving a Forest and the Rule of Law: Commission v Poland. Case C-441/17 R, Commission v Poland, Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 November 2017’ (2019) 56 Common Market Law Review 541Google Scholar

Williams, A, ‘Taking Values Seriously: Towards a Philosophy of EU Law’ (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 549Google Scholar

Wyrzykowski, M, ‘Experiencing the Unimaginable: the Collapse of the Rule of Law in Poland’ (2019) 11 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 417Google Scholar