Alterio, M, ‘Reactive v. Structural Approach: A Public Law Response to Populism’ (2019) 8(2) Global Constitutionalism 270Google Scholar

Bejarano, A M, and Segura, R, ‘The Difference Power Diffusion Makes: Explaining Divergent Outcomes in Colombia (1990–1991) and Venezuela (1998–1999)’ in Negretto, G (ed), Redrafting Constitutions in Democratic Regimes: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Blokker, P, Bugarič, B, and Halmai, G, ‘Introduction: Populist Constitutionalism: Varieties, Complexities and Contradictions’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 291Google Scholar

Braver, J, ‘Hannah Arendt in Venezuela: The Supreme Court Battles Hugo Chávez over the Creation of the 1999 Constitution’ (2016) 14(3) International Journal of Constitutional Law 555Google Scholar

Brewer Carías, A R ‘¿Reforma constitucional o mutación constitucional?: La experiencia venezolana’ [‘Constitutional reform or constitutional mutation?: The Venezuelan experience’] (2007) 137 Revista de Derecho Público 19Google Scholar

Brewer Carías, A R, Dismantling Democracy in Venezuela: The Chavez Authoritarian Experiment (Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Brinks, D, ‘“Faithful Servants of the Regime”: The Brazilian Constitutional Court’s Role under the 1988 Constitution’ in Helmke, G and Ríos-Figueroa, J (eds), Courts in Latin America (Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Bugarič, B, ‘Could Populism be Good for Constitutional Democracy’ (2019) Annual Review of Law and Social Science 41Google Scholar

Cañizalez, A, and Matos-Smith, M, ‘El Caso de Globovisión y la implantación del modelo mixto-autoritario en el sistema de medios’ [‘The Globovisión case and the implantation of a mixed-authoritarian model in the media system’] (2015) 59 Iberoamericana 127Google Scholar

Canova González, A, Herrera-Orellana, L A, Rodríguez Ortega, R E, Graterol Stefanelli, G, and Fernández, A C, El TSJ al Servicio de la Revolución [‘The TSJ at the Service of the Revolution’] (Editorial Galipán, 2015)Google Scholar

Capriles, V, Santacruz, A, and Pérez-Perdomo, R, ‘Represión, justicia y derecho en la Venezuela de hoy’ [‘Repression, justice and Law in today’s Venezuela’] (2020) 10(4) Oñati Socio-Legal Series 789Google Scholar

Casal, J M, ‘De la Constitucion nominal a la constitucion fachada’ [‘From a nominal constitution to a facade constitution’] in Alvarez, A and Alarcon, B (eds), Venezuela sin Chávez (Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, 2003)Google Scholar

Casal, J M, ‘The Constitutional Chamber and the Erosion of Democracy in Venezuela’ (2021) 80 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht/Heidelberg Journal of International Law 913Google Scholar

Casanueva Baptista, A, and Sánchez Urribarrí, R, ‘Why Populism(s)?’ (2018) 149(1) Thesis Eleven 3Google Scholar

Colón-Ríos, J, ‘Carl Schmitt and Constituent Power in Latin American Courts: The Cases of Venezuela and Colombia’ (2011) 18 Constellations 365Google Scholar

Corrales, J, ‘Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela’ (2015) 26(2) Journal of Democracy 37Google Scholar

Corrales, J, ‘Authoritarian Survival: Why Maduro Hasn’t Fallen’ (2020) 31(3) Journal of Democracy 39Google Scholar

Corrales, J, and Penfold, M, Dragon in the Tropics: Hugo Chávez and the Political Economy of Revolution in Venezuela (Brookings Latin America Initiative, 2009)Google Scholar

Diamond, L, Plattner, M F, and Walker, C (eds), Authoritarianism Goes Global: The Challenge to Democracy (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R, ‘Introduction – Public Law and Populism’ (2019) 20(2) German Law Journal 125Google Scholar

Domingo, P, ‘Judicialization of Politics or Politicization of the Judiciary? Recent Trends in Latin America’ (2004) 11(1) Democratization 104Google Scholar

Dressel, B, Sánchez Urribarrí, R, and Stroh, A, ‘The Informal Dimension of Judicial Politics: A Relational Perspective’ (2017) 13 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 413Google Scholar

Gómez Gamboa, D A ‘Decisión No. 957 de la Sala Constitucional del TSJ: Caso RCTV’ [‘Decision 957 of the TSJ’s Constitutional Chamber: The RCTV case’] (2008) 15(1) Frónesis 177Google Scholar

Hawkins, K, Venezuela’s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Helmke, G, and Ríos-Figueroa, J, ‘Introduction: Courts in Latin America’ in Helmke, G and Ríos-Figueroa, J (eds), Courts in Latin America (Cambridge University Press, 2018)Google Scholar

Hernández González, J, ‘Justicia constitucional y poder político en Venezuela’ [‘Constitutional justice and political power in Venezuela’] (2016) Anuario de Derecho Constitucional Latinoamericano 75Google Scholar

Hilbink, L, Judges Beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile (Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschl, R, ‘The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts’ (2008) 11 Annual Review of Political Science 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, R, and Randazzo, K (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior (Routledge, 2018)Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch Una Década de Chávez: Intolerancia Política y Oportunidades Perdidas para el Progreso de los Derechos Humanos en Venezuela [A Decade Under Chávez: Political Intolerance and Lost Opportunities for Advancing Human Rights in Venezuela] (Report, Human Rights Watch, 18 September 2008) hrw.org/report/2008/09/18/decade-under-chavez/political-intolerance-and-lost-opportunities-advancing-humanGoogle Scholar

Huq, A, and Ginsburg, T, ‘How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy’ (2018) 65 UCLA Law Review 79Google Scholar

Kosar, D, Perils of Judicial Self-Government in Transitional Societies (Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Kosar, D, and Sipulova, K, ‘How to Fight Court-Packing?’ (2020) 6 Constitutional Studies 133Google Scholar

Landau, D, ‘Abusive Constitutionalism’ (2013) 47 UC Davis Law Review 189Google Scholar

Landau, D, ‘Courts and Constitution Making in Democratic Regimes: A Contextual Approach’ in Negretto, G (ed), Redrafting Constitutions in Democratic Regimes: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Levitsky, S, ‘How autocrats can rig the game and damage democracy’ Washington Post (4 January 2019), www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2019/01/04/how-do-you-know-when-a-democracy-has-slipped-over-into-autocracy/Google Scholar

López Maya, M, El Ocaso del Chavismo: Venezuela 2005–2015 [‘The Twilight of Chavismo: Venezuela 2005–2015’] (Editorial Alfa, 2016)Google Scholar

López Maya, M, ‘Populism, 21st Century Socialism and Corruption in Venezuela’ (2018) 149(1) Thesis Eleven 67Google Scholar

Louza-Scognamiglio, L, ‘La estrecha y necesaria relación entre independencia judicial, estado de derecho, el respeto de los derechos humanos y democracia: Venezuela como caso de estudio’ [‘The close and necessary relationship between judicial Independence, rule of law, respect to Human Rights and democracy: Venezuela as a case study’] (2007) 72 Acta Sociológica 95Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J, and Macedo, S, ‘Populism and Democratic Theory’ (2019) 15(1) Annual Review of Law and Social Science 59Google Scholar

Mendoza-Botelho, M, Bernal, A, and Sánchez Urribarrí, R ‘Populist Constitutionalism in the Andes: The Cases of Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela’ (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, September 2017)Google Scholar

Moustafa, T, The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics and Economic Development in Egypt (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Moustafa, T, ‘Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes’ (2014) 10 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 281Google Scholar

Moustafa, T, and Ginsburg, T, ‘Introduction: The functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics’ in Ginsburg, T and Moustafa, T (eds), Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Mudde, C, and Kaltwasser, C Rovira, ‘Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda’ (2018) 51(13) Comparative Political Studies 1667Google Scholar

Müller, J W ‘Populism and Constitutionalism’ in Rovira Kaltwasser, C, Taggart, P, Ochoa Espejo, P, and Ostiguy, P (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

O’Donnell, G A, ‘Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies’ (1998) 9(3) Journal of Democracy 112Google Scholar

Pérez-Perdomo, R, ‘Judicialization and Regime Transformation: The Venezuelan Supreme Court’ in Sieder, R, Schjolden, L, and Angell, A (eds), The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005)Google Scholar

Pérez-Perdomo, R, and Santacruz, A, ‘La legitimidad de jueces y legisladores en el estado constitucional de Derecho: la Asamblea Nacional y el Tribunal Supremo Venezolano’ [‘Judges and legislators’ legitimacy in the constitutional state based on the rule of law: The National Assembly and the Venezuelan Supreme Tribunal’] (2016) 39 DOXA: Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho 405Google Scholar

Popova, M, Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine (Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Prendergast, D, ‘The Judicial Role in Protecting Democracy from Populism’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 245Google Scholar

Reporteros Sin Fronteras por la Libertad de Prensa ‘Venezuela: Cierre de Radio Caracas Televisión: La consolidación de una hegemonía mediática’ [Venezuela: The Closure of Radio Caracas Televisión: The consolidation of media hegemony’] Reporteros sin Fronteras (5 June 2007) rsf.org/es/informes/cierre-de-radio-caracas-television-la-consolidacion-de-una-hegemonia-mediaticaGoogle Scholar

Rovira Kaltwasser, C, Taggart, P A, Ochoa Espejo, P, and Ostiguy, P, ‘Populism: An Overview of the Concept and the State of the Art’ in Rovira Kaltwasser, C, Taggart, P A, Ochoa Espejo, P, and Ostiguy, P (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Sadurski, W, Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Sánchez Urribarrí, R A ‘Courts between Democracy and Hybrid Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court’ (2011) 36(4) Law & Social Inquiry 854Google Scholar

Sánchez Urribarrí, R A ‘Venezuela 2015: Un régimen híbrido en crisis’ [‘Venezuela 2015: A hybrid regime in crisis’] (2016) 36(1) Revista de Ciencia Política 365Google Scholar

Sánchez Urribarrí, R, ‘Between Power and Submissiveness: Constitutional Adjudication in Latin America’ in Dixon, R and Ginsburg, T (eds), Comparative Constitutional Law in Latin America (Edward Elgar, 2017)Google Scholar

Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘Guardians of the Constitution: Constitutional Court Presidents and the Struggle for the Rule of Law in Post-Soviet Europe’ (2006) 154(6) University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1757Google Scholar

Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘Autocratic Legalism’ (2018) 85(2) The University of Chicago Law Review 545Google Scholar

Shapiro, M, Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (University of Chicago Press, 1981)Google Scholar

Trochev, A, Judging Russia: The Role of the Constitutional Court in Russian Politics, 1990–2006 (Cambridge University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trochev, A, and Ellett, R, ‘Judges and Their Allies’ (2014) 2 Journal of Law and Courts 67Google Scholar

‘7 nulidades do processo de impeachment’ [7 nullities in the impeachment process] Justificando (30 August 2016) justificando.com/2016/08/30/7-nulidades-do-processo-de-impeachment/Google Scholar

‘64 por cento reprovam governo Dilma’ [64 per cent disapprove of Dilma’s government] Datafolha Instituto de Pesquisas (29 February 2016) datafolha.folha.uol.com.br/opiniaopublica/2016/02/1744564-64-reprovam-governo-dilma.shtmlGoogle Scholar

Abessa, D A Famá, and Buruaem, L, ‘The Systematic Dismantling of Brazilian Environmental Laws Risks Losses on All Fronts’ (2019) 3 Nature Ecology and Evolution 510Google Scholar

Agência Câmara Notícias, ‘Cunha faz leitura de decisão favorável ao processo de impeachment’ [Cunha reads his decision in favour of impeachment] (3 December 2015) 2.camara.leg.br/camaranoticias/noticias/POLITICA/501201-CUNHA-FAZ-LEITURA-DE-DECISAO-FAVORAVEL-AO-PROCESSO-DE-IMPEACHMENT.htmlGoogle Scholar

‘Apenas 24 por cento da população confia no STF’ [Only 24 per cent of the population trusts the Brazilian Supreme Court] Migalhas (23 October 2017) migalhas.uol.com.br/quentes/267694/apenas-24--da-populacao-confia-no-stfGoogle Scholar

Badaró, G, ‘A conexão no processo penal, segundo o princípio do juiz natural, e sua aplicação nos processos da Operação Lava Jato’ [Connection in penal procedure, according to jus naturale, and its application in the proceedings of the Car Wash Investigation] (2016) 122 Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Criminais 171Google Scholar

Barifouse, R, ‘O que dizem os outros 11 pedidos de impeachment contra Dilma’ [What the other 11 impeachment petitions against Dilma say] BBC News Brasil (17 April 2016) bbc.com/portuguese/noticias/2016/04/160414_outros_pedidos_impeachment_rbGoogle Scholar

Berg, R, ‘Judging Bolsonaro’ Foreign Policy (7 December 2018) foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/07/judging-bolsonaro/Google Scholar

Blee, K M, and Vining, T, Risks and Ethics of Social Movement Research in a Changing Political Climate (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change Volume 30, Elsevier, 2010)Google Scholar

Capelo, R, ‘O que diz o pedido de Hélio Bicudo para o impeachment da presidente Dilma Rousseff’ [What the impeachment petition against Dilma Rousseff by Helio Bicudo says] Epoca (4 December 2015) epoca.globo.com/tempo/noticia/2015/12/o-que-diz-o-pedido-de-helio-bicudo-para-o-impeachment-da-presidente-dilma-rousseff.htmlGoogle Scholar

Cesarino, L, ‘On Digital Populism in Brazil’ (2019) PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 1Google Scholar

Chagas-Bastos, F H, ‘Political Realignment in Brazil: Jair Bolsonaro and the Right Turn’ (2019) Revista de Estudios Sociales 92Google Scholar

Chemim, V L, ‘Senado agiu com ativismo legislativo no julgamento de Dilma’ [Senate acted with legislative activism in Dilma’s impeachment] Consultor Jurídico (2 October 2016) conjur.com.br/2016-out-02/vera-chemim-senado-agiu-ativismo-legislativo-julgar-dilmaGoogle Scholar

Cruz, F S, ‘OAB diz que Bolsonaro ataca advocacia com informações falsas’ [Brazilian Bar Association says that Bolsonaro attacks legal practice with false information] Consultor Jurídico (29 June 2019) conjur.com.br/2019-jun-29/oab-bolsonaro-ataca-advocacia-informacoes-falsasGoogle Scholar

‘Cunha faz leitura de decisão favorável ao processo de impeachment’ [Cunha reads his decision in favour of impeachment] Câmara dos Deputados (Agência Câmara de Notícias, 3 December 2015) 2.camara.leg.br/noticias/477292-cunha-faz-leitura-de-decisao-favoravel-ao-processo-de-impeachment/Google Scholar

Daly, Tom, ‘Populism, Public Law, and Democratic Decay in Brazil: Understanding the Rise of Jair Bolsonaro’ (11 March 2019, paper prepared for 14th International Human Rights Researchers’ Workshop, ‘Democratic Backsliding and Human Rights’, 2–3 January 2019) ssrn.com/abstract=3350098Google Scholar

da Silva, D R, ‘A (super)competência (ilegal) das varas federais especializadas’ [The (illegal) (super) jurisdictional powers of the specialized federal courts] Jusbrasil (2017) canalcienciascriminais.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/473115774/a-super-competencia-ilegal-das-varas-federais-especializadasGoogle Scholar

de Carvalho, A D Z, ‘Entre o dever da toga e o apoio à farda: independência judicial e imparcialidade no STF durante o regime militar’ [Between the judicial duties and the support of the military: judicial independence and the Brazilian Supreme Court impartiality during the military regime] (2017) 32 Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais 1Google Scholar

De La Torre, C, ‘Populism in Latin America’ in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

de Moraes, M, and Matais, A, ‘Dilma teve 63 pedidos de impeachment; Temer já tem 18’ [Dilma had 63 petitions for impeachment; Temer already has 18] Estadao (25 May 2017) politica.estadao.com.br/blogs/coluna-do-estadao/dilma-teve-63-pedidos-de-impeachment-temer-ja-tem-18/Google Scholar

De Sa e Silva, F, ‘From Car Wash to Bolsonaro: Law and Lawyers in Brazil’s Illiberal Turn (2014–2018)’ (2020) 47(S1) Journal of Law and Society 90Google Scholar

‘De Sarney a Dilma: 25 anos desde a redemocratização’ [From Sarney to Dilma: 25 years since redemocratization] Senado Federal (Senado Notícias, 30 December 2010) senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2010/12/30/de-sarney-a-dilma-25-anos-desde-a-redemocratizacao/Google Scholar

Dix, R H, ‘Populism: Authoritarian and Democratic’ (1985) 20 Latin American Research Review 29Google Scholar

‘Estatísticas eleitorais 2014’ [2014 election statistics] Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (2014) tse.jus.br/eleicoes/estatisticas/eleicoes/eleicoes-anteriores/estatisticas-candidaturas-2014/estatisticas-eleitorais-2014-eleitoradoGoogle Scholar

Fishman, A, Martins, R M, Demori, L, Santi, A De, and Greenwald, G, ‘Breach of Ethics’ The Intercept (10 June 2019) theintercept.com/2019/06/09/brazil-lula-operation-car-wash-sergio-moroGoogle Scholar

Furtado, H, ‘O “Efeito Bolsonaro”‘ [The Bolsonaro Effect] Open Democracy (19 October 2018) opendemocracy.net/pt/o-efeito-bolsonaro/Google Scholar

Dilma é reeleita presidente e amplia para 16 anos ciclo do PT no poder - notícias em Eleições 2014’ [Dilma is re-elected president and broadens to 16 years PT’s power cycle – 2014 Election news] Globo (26 October 2014) g1.globo.com/politica/eleicoes/2014/noticia/2014/10/dilma-e-reeleita-presidente-e-amplia-para-16-anos-ciclo-do-pt-no-poder.htmGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, T, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Goldstein, A, Bolsonaro: La democracia de Brasil en peligro [Bolsonaro: Brazil’s democracy in danger] (Marea, 2019)Google Scholar

Halmai, G, ‘Populism, Authoritarianism and Constitutionalism’ (2019) 3 German Law Journal 296Google Scholar

Howse, R, ‘Populism and Its Enemies’ (Paper given at ‘Workshop on Public Law and the New Populism’, Jean Monnet Center, NYU Law School, New York City, 2017)Google Scholar

Hunter, W, and Power, T J, ‘Bolsonaro and Brazil’s Illiberal Backlash’ (2019) 30 Journal of Democracy 68Google Scholar

Juenger, F, ‘Forum Shopping, Domestic and International’ (1989) 63 Tulane Law Review 553Google Scholar

Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre ‘Populism: An Overview of the Concept and the State of the Art’ in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Kovacs, Z, and Diamond, L, ‘How Democratic Is Hungary?’ (2019) 98(5) Foreign AffairsGoogle Scholar

Laclau, E, ‘Populism: What’s in a Name?’ in Panizza, Francisco (ed) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (Verso, 2005)Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, ‘How Autocrats Can Rig the Game and Damage Democracy’ Washington Post (4 January 2019) washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2019/01/04/how-do-you-know-when-a-democracy-has-slipped-over-into-autocracy/Google Scholar

Levitsky, S, and Ziblatt, D, How Democracies Die (Crown, 2018)Google Scholar

Lodi, R, ‘Pedaladas hermenêuticas no pedido de impeachment de Dilma Rousseff’ [Hermeneutic pedalling in the impeachment petition against Dilma Rousseff] Consultor Jurídico (4 December 2015) conjur.com.br/2015-dez-04/ricardo-lodi-pedaladas-hermeneuticas-pedido-impeachmentGoogle Scholar

Moustafa, T, ‘Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes’ (2014) 10 Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 281Google Scholar

Moustafa, T, and Ginsburg, T, ‘Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics’ in Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir (eds) Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Mudde, C, ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’ (2004) 39(4) Government and Opposition 541Google Scholar

‘Perícia vê ação de Dilma em decretos, mas não identifica nas pedaladas’ [Forensics see Dilma’s actions in decrees, but do not identify fiscal pedalling] Globo (26 June 2016) g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2016/06/pericia-ve-acao-de-dilma-em-decretos-mas-nao-identifica-nas-pedaladas.htmlGoogle Scholar

Pompeu, L, ‘Moro se demite e diz que Bolsonaro interferiu na PF por preocupação com inquérito no STF’ [Moro resigns and says that Bolsonaro interfered in the Federal Police because of concerns with investigations in the Supreme Court] Congresso em Foco (24 April 2020) congressoemfoco.uol.com.br/governo/moro-anuncia-pedido-de-demissao%20acompanhe-aqui/Google Scholar

Recondo, F, Tanques e togas: o STF e a ditadura militar [Tanks and robes: the Brazilian Supreme Court and the military dictatorship] (Sao Paulo: Compania das Letras, 2018Google Scholar

Resende, L, ‘MP perde prazo para recorrer de decisão que deu foro a Flávio Bolsonaro’ [Prosecutors miss deadline for appeal against decision that gave Flavio Bolsonaro special forum] CNN Brasil (11 August 2020) cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/2020/08/11/mp-perde-prazo-para-recorrer-de-decisao-que-deu-foro-a-flavio-bolsonaroGoogle Scholar

Sadurski, W, Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Saint-Clair, C, Bolsonaro: o homem que peitou o exército e desafia a democracia [Bolsonaro: the man who fought the army and defies democracy] (Rio de Janeiro: Maquina de Livros, 2018)Google Scholar

Urribarrí, Sánchez, Raul, A ‘Courts between Democracy and Hybrid Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court’ (2011) 36 Law and Social Inquiry 854Google Scholar

‘Senado aprova impeachment, Dilma perde mandato e Temer assume’ [Senate approves impeachment, Dilma loses mandate and Temer takes over] Globo (31 August 2016) g1.globo.com/politica/processo-de-impeachment-de-dilma/noticia/2016/08/senado-aprova-impeachment-dilma-perde-mandato-e-temer-assume.htmlGoogle Scholar

Tavares, J, and Prado, G, ‘Parecer sobre os requisitos jurídicos para o impeachment da Presidente da República’ [Report on the legal requisites of the impeachment of a President] Estadão (26 October 2015) politica.estadao.com.br/blogs/fausto-macedo/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2015/12/Juarez.pdGoogle Scholar

Torres, M G, ‘O golpe, o ato, os juristas e o STF: uma história da recepção da ditadura no campo jurídico.’ [The coup, the actions, the lawyers and the Supreme Court: a history of the reception of the dictatorship in the legal field] (2016) 4 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia 47Google Scholar

Tribunal Superior Eleitoral, ‘Estatísticas eleitorais 2014’ [2014 election statistics] (2014) tse.jus.br/eleicoes/estatisticas/eleicoes/eleicoes-anteriores/estatisticas-candidaturas-2014/estatisticas-eleitorais-2014-eleitoradoGoogle Scholar

Urbinati, N, Me The People: How Populism Transforms Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Way, Lucan Ahmad, and Levitsky, Steven, ‘How Autocrats Can Rig the Game and Damage Democracy’ Washington Post (4 January 2019) washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2019/01/04/how-do-you-know-when-a-democracy-has-slipped-over-into-autocracy/Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew, Post Sovereign Constitution Making: Learning and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Bárd, Petra, ‘To Leave or Not to Leave? Viktor Orbán’s War against George Soros and the CEU Dilemma’ Reconnect Europe (14 February 2019) reconnect-europe.eu/blog/bard-orban-ceudilemma/Google Scholar

Bibó, I, Válogatott tanulmányok 1935–1979. IV. köt. [Selected essays Volume 4] (Magvető Kiadó, 1990), 164Google Scholar

Blokker, Paul, New Democracies in Crisis? (Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar

Boda, Zsolt and Medve-Bálint, Gergő, ‘A rendőrségbe vetett bizalom tényezői’ [Features of confidence in the police] in Boda, Zsolt (ed) Bizalom és közpolitika Jobban működnek-e az intézmények, ha bíznak bennük? [Confidence and public policy. Do the institutions work better if there is trust in them?] (Argumentum–MTA TK Politikatudományi Intézet, 2015)Google Scholar

Bodnár, Eszter, ‘Gedanken über die Einführung der öffentlichen Verhandlung am ungarischen Verfassungsgericht’ [Thoughts about the introduction of a public hearing at the Hungarian Constitutional Court] (2017) 1 Osteuroparecht 65Google Scholar

Bodnár, Eszter, Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina and Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Zoltán, ‘Hungary: The State of Liberal Democracy’ in Albert, Richard, David, Landau, Pietro, Faraguna and Šimon, Drugda (eds) 2017 Global Review of Constitutional Law (Boston: ICONnect-Clough Center, 2018) 129Google Scholar

Csilla, Mihalicz, ‘Interjú Sólyom Lászlóval, az alkotmánybíróság volt elnökével’ [Interview with László Sólyom, former President of the Constitutional Court] (1998) 10 Budapesti Könyvszemle 435Google Scholar

Csink, Lóránt and Fröhlich, Johanna, ‘Történeti alkotmány és kontinuitás az új alaptörvényben’ [Historic constitution and continuity in the new Fundamental Law] (2012) 1 Közjogi Szemle 9Google Scholar

Dezső, Márta, ‘Hungary’ in Alen, André, Haljan, David (eds) International Encyclopedia for Constitutional Law (Kluwer Law International, 2010)Google Scholar

Drinóczi, Tímea, ‘Hungarian Abuse of Constitutional Emergency Regimes – Also in the Light of the COVID-19 Crisis’ (MTA Law Working Paper 2020/13, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 30 April 2020)Google Scholar

Dupré, Catherine, Importing the Law in Post-communist Transitions: The Hungarian Constitutional Court and the Right to Human Dignity (Hart Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar

Fröhlich, Johanna, ‘Az Abtv. 26. § (2) bekezdése szerinti, közvetlenül a jogszabályok ellen benyújtható alkotmányjogi panaszok befogadhatósága’ [The admissibility of the constitutional complaints directly submitted against legal acts according to Constitutional Court Act § 26 (1)] (2013) 1 Alkotmánybírósági Szemle 90Google Scholar

Fröhlich, Johanna, ‘Az Alkotmánybíróság és a Kúria alkotmányértelmezése. Az Alaptörvény R) és 28. cikkei’ in Az Alaptörvény érvényesülése a bírói gyakorlatban III. Alkotmányjogi panasz - a hatáskörrel kapcsolatos kérdések [The constitutional interpretation of the Constitutional Court and the Kuria. Article R and 28] (Alkotmánybíróság - Kúria - HVG Orac, 2019)Google Scholar

Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina, ‘A bírói döntések ellen benyújtott alkotmányjogi panaszok befogadhatósága I. – Az Abtv. 26. § (1) bekezdése’ [The admissibility of constitutional complaints against judicial decisions, Part I – Constitutional Court Act § 26 (1)] (2013) 1 Alkotmánybírósági Szemle 82Google Scholar

Halmai, Gábor, ‘The Hungarian Approach to Constitutional Review: The End of Activism? The First Decade of the Hungarian Constitutional Court’ in Sadurski, Wojciech (ed) Constitutional Justice East and West (Kluwer Law International, 2002)Google Scholar

Halmai, Gábor, ‘In memoriam magyar alkotmánybíráskodás: A pártos Alkotmánybíróság első éve’ [In memoriam Hungarian constitutional review: The first ten years of the partial Constitutional Court] (2014) 1–2 Fundamentum 36Google Scholar

Halmai, Gábor, ‘The Invalid Anti-Migrant Referendum in Hungary’ Verfassungsblog (4 October 2016) verfassungsblog.de/hungarys-anti-european-immigration-laws/Google Scholar

Halmai, Gábor, ‘Abuse of Constitutional Identity. The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2018) 43 Review of Central and East European Law 23Google Scholar

Halmai, Gábor, and Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘Don’t Be Fooled by Autocrats! Why Hungary’s Emergency Violates Rule of Law’ Verfassungsblog (22 April 2020) verfassungsblog.de/dont-be-fooled-by-autocrats/Google Scholar

Jakab, András, ‘A bírói jogértelmezés az Alaptörvény tükrében’ [Judicial interpretation in the mirror of the Fundamental Law] (2011) 4 Jogesetek Magyarázata 86Google Scholar

Kazai, Viktor Z, ‘No One Has the Right to be Homeless …’ Verfassungsblog (13 June 2019) verfassungsblog.de/no-one-has-the-right-to-be-homeless/Google Scholar

Kelemen, Katalin, ‘The Hungarian Constitutional Court enters the dialogue on national constitutional identity’ Diritti Comparati (30 March 2017) diritticomparati.it/the-hungarian-constitutional-court-enters-the-dialogue-on-national-constitutional-identity/Google Scholar

Kéri, Veronika and Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Zoltán, ‘Az Alkotmánybíróság határozata az Alaptörvény E) cikkének értelmezéséről. Az alapjogi fenntartás, a szuverenitásvédelem és az alkotmányos identitás dilemmái’ [The decision of the Constitutional Court on the interpretation of Article E of the Fundamental Law. The fundamental right restriction, the protection of sovereignty and the dilemma of constitutional identity] (2017) 1–2 Jogesetek Magyarázata 5Google Scholar

Klein, Claude and Sajó, András, ‘Constitution-Making: Process and Substance’ in Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Paczolay, Péter, ‘The Transformation of Constitutional Court in Hungary’ in Szente, Zoltán, Mandák, Fanni, and Fejes, Zsuzsanna (eds) Challenges and pitfalls in the recent Hungarian constitutional development (L’Harmattan, 2015)Google Scholar

Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Zoltán, ‘A Kúria végzése a betelepítési kvótáról szóló népszavazási kérdésről: Országgyűlési hatáskör az európai jog homályában’ [The decision of the Kúria on the referendum question about the immigration quota: The competence of the Parliament in the obscurity of the European law] (2016) 1–2 Jogesetek Magyarázata 77Google Scholar

Prendergast, David, ‘The Judicial Role in Protecting Democracy from Populism’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 245Google Scholar

Rixer, Ádám, ‘A történeti alkotmány lehetséges jelentéstartalmai’ [The possible meaning of the historic constitution] (2011) 3 Jogelméleti Szemle jesz.ajk.elte.hu/rixer47.htmlGoogle Scholar

Rozsnyai, Krisztina, ‘Änderungen im System des Verwaltungsrechtsschutzes in Ungarn’ [Changes in the administrative law review system in Hungary] (2013) 9 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 335Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech, Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (Springer, 2nd ed, 2014)Google Scholar

Sajó, András, ‘Reading the Invisible Constitution: Judicial Review in Hungary’ (1995) 2 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 253Google Scholar

Smuk, Péter, ‘Nemzetfogalom és történelmi narratíva az Alaptörvényben’ [The term nation and historic narrative in the Fundamental Law] in Kecskés, Gábor, (ed) Doktori Műhelytanulmányok 2013 (Győr: Széchenyi István Egyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Doktori Iskola, 2013) 259Google Scholar

Sólyom, László, Az alkotmánybíráskodás kezdetei Magyarországon [The beginnings of the constitutional adjudication in Hungary] (Budapest, Osiris, 2001)Google Scholar

Sólyom, László, ‘Előszó. Az alkotmányos kultúra szerepe’ [Foreword: The role of the constitutional culture] in Jakab, András, Az új Alaptörvény keletkezése és gyakorlati következményei (HVG-ORAC, 2011)Google Scholar

Sólyom, László, ‘The Rise and Decline of Constitutional Culture in Hungary’ in Bogdandy, Armin von, Sonnevend, Pál (eds), Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area (Hart Publishing, 2015)Google Scholar

Sólyom, László and Brunner, Georg (eds), Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional Court (University of Michigan Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Somody, Bernadette and Vissy, Beatrix, ‘Citizen’s Role in Constitutional Adjudication in Hungary: From the Actio Popularis to the Constitutional Complaint’ (2012) 53 Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae - Sectio Iuridica 95Google Scholar

Sonnevend, Pál, Jakab, András, and Csink, Lóránt, ‘The Constitution as an Instrument of Everyday Party Politics: The Basic Law of Hungary’ in Bogdandy, Armin von and Sonnevend, Pál (eds) Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area (Hart Publishing, 2015)Google Scholar

Szente, Zoltán, ‘A 2020. március 11-én kihirdetett veszélyhelyzet alkotmányossági problémái’ [The constitutional problems of the state of emergency announced on 11 March 2020] (MTA Law Working Paper 2020/9, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 10 April 2020)Google Scholar

Szente, Zoltán, ‘A historizáló alkotmányozás problémái − a történeti alkotmány és a Szent Korona az új Alaptörvényben’ [The problems of history-looking constitution-making] (2011) 3 Közjogi Szemle 1Google Scholar

Szente, Zoltán, ‘The Political Orientation of the Members of the Hungarian Constitutional Court between 2010 and 2014’ (2016) 1 Constitutional Studies 123Google Scholar

Szily, László, ‘Orbán azzal kezdi az új vicces videóját, hogy háromszor is megalázza a totálisan kikészült Patyi Andrást’ (2018) [Orban starts his first funny video by humiliating three times the totally snapped András Patyi] 444.hu/2018/04/13/orban-azzal-kezdi-az-uj-vicces-videojat-hogy-haromszor-is-megalazza-a-totalisan-kikeszult-patyi-andrastGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, Mark and Bugarič, Bojan, ‘Populism and Constitutionalism: An Essay on Definitions and Their Implications’ (21 April 2020) nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42660123Google Scholar

Vincze, Attila, ‘Wrestling with Constitutionalism: The Supermajority and the Hungarian Constitutional Court’ (2014) 8 Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 86Google Scholar

Vincze, Attila, Csuhány, Péter, Sonnevend, Pál and Jakab, András, ‘32/A. § [Az Alkotmánybíróság]’ in Jakab, András, Az Alkotmány kommentárja (Századvég Kiadó, 2009)Google Scholar

Vörös, Imre, ‘A történeti alkotmány az Alkotmánybíróság gyakorlatában’ [The historic constitution in the practice of the Constitutional Court] (2016) 4 Közjogi Szemle 44Google Scholar