Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- 1 The Strange Death of Political Anthropology
- 2 Locating the Political
- 3 Culture, Nation, and Misery
- 4 Performing Democracy
- 5 States and Persons
- 6 The State and Violence
- 7 Pluralism in Theory, Pluralism in Practice
- 8 Politics and Counter-politics
- Bibliography
- Index
4 - Performing Democracy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- 1 The Strange Death of Political Anthropology
- 2 Locating the Political
- 3 Culture, Nation, and Misery
- 4 Performing Democracy
- 5 States and Persons
- 6 The State and Violence
- 7 Pluralism in Theory, Pluralism in Practice
- 8 Politics and Counter-politics
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The most exciting recent writing on democracy in South Asia has come on the boundary between political theory, history and anthropology. In his wonderful overview of India in the years since Independence, Sunil Khilnani pays particular attention to the place of democracy and the state in India's social fabric:
Democracy is a type of government, a political regime of laws and institutions. But its imaginative potency rests in its promise to bring alien and powerful machines like the state under the control of human will, to enable a community of political equals before the constitutional law to make their own history. Like those other great democratic experiments inaugurated in eighteenth-century America and France, India became a democracy without really knowing how, why, or what it meant to be one. Yet the democratic idea has penetrated the Indian political imagination and has begun to corrode the authority of the social order and of a paternalist state. Democracy as a manner of seeing and acting upon the world is changing the relation of Indians to themselves.
(Khilnani 1997: 16–17)And Thomas Hansen places democracy and its consequences at the heart of his important study of the rise of Hindu nationalism. He follows Sudipta Kaviraj (1998) in discerning a strange kind of ‘Tocquevillian revolution’ in post-Independence India:
[Not] because India represents a replay of the western democratic revolutions or because democracy always tends towards the production of modern individuals and citizenship, as a more conventional Tocquevillean thesis would run. I would argue, quite the contrary, that the idea of a democratic revolution in India makes sense exactly because the trajectory of modernity and democracy in India demonstrates so clearly how democracy makes the political dimensions of society crucial, productive, and deeply problematic.
(Hansen 1999: 57)- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Anthropology, Politics, and the StateDemocracy and Violence in South Asia, pp. 72 - 95Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007