Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Foundations of Anthropological Genetics
- Part 1 Theory
- Part 2 Methods
- Chapter 4 The Importance of Field Research in Anthropological Genetics: Methods, Experiences and Results
- Chapter 5 The Confluence of Anthropological Genetics and Anthropological Demography
- Chapter 6 Molecular Markers in Anthropological Genetic Studies
- Chapter 7 The Use of Quantitative Traits in Anthropological Genetic Studies of Population Structure and History
- Chapter 8 Ancient DNA and its Application to the Reconstruction of Human Evolution and History
- Part 3 General Applications
- Part 4 Part IV The Human Diaspora
- Index
- References
Chapter 7 - The Use of Quantitative Traits in Anthropological Genetic Studies of Population Structure and History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Foundations of Anthropological Genetics
- Part 1 Theory
- Part 2 Methods
- Chapter 4 The Importance of Field Research in Anthropological Genetics: Methods, Experiences and Results
- Chapter 5 The Confluence of Anthropological Genetics and Anthropological Demography
- Chapter 6 Molecular Markers in Anthropological Genetic Studies
- Chapter 7 The Use of Quantitative Traits in Anthropological Genetic Studies of Population Structure and History
- Chapter 8 Ancient DNA and its Application to the Reconstruction of Human Evolution and History
- Part 3 General Applications
- Part 4 Part IV The Human Diaspora
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
This chapter may seem to some to be a fond remembrance of things past. Given the increasing wealth of new data on genetic variation in humans, it might seem rather old-fashioned to deal with quantitative traits. Long before the discovery of blood groups, protein and enzyme polymorphisms, and DNA sequences, the only way anthropologists could describe human variation was in terms of quantitative traits, such as anthropometrics. In the broadest sense, a quantitative trait is one whose genotypic and/or phenotypic distribution is continuous, such as stature or head length, rather than discrete, such as a blood type or a DNA haplotype. Quantitative traits are often referred to as ‘complex traits’ because the phenotype is a reflection of both genetic and non-genetic influences, the latter of which can include age, diet and climate, as well as many other factors. Some quantitative traits, such as the level of phenylalanine in the blood, are due to a single gene whose phenotypic expression is affected by environmental (non-genetic) influences resulting in a continuous distribution. Other traits, such as cleft palate, are phenotypically discrete, but reflect an underlying continuous genotypic distribution under a threshold model. Most quantitative traits examined in the course of anthropological research are assumed to be polygenic, where a continuous distribution (often reflecting a normal distribution) is a function of multiple genes and environmental influences (Cavalli-Sforza and Bodmer, 1971). The primary focus of this chapter is on polygenic quantitative traits and their application to questions of population structure and history.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Anthropological GeneticsTheory, Methods and Applications, pp. 187 - 209Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
, , and (1997). An apportionment of human DNA diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94, 4516–519CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1972). Head form and climatic stress. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 37, 85–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1983). Climate and the evolution of brachycephalization. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 62, 425–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1984). Brain size, cranial morphology, climate, and time machines. Current Anthropology, 25, 301–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1912). Changes in the Bodily Form of Descendants of Immigrants. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1950). Genetics and the Races of Man: An Introduction to Modern Physical Anthropology, Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
, and (1994). The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1990). Quantitative traits in relation to population structure: Why and how are they used and what do they imply?Human Biology, 62, 147–62Google ScholarPubMed
(1973). The use of genetic markers of the blood in the study of the evolution of human populations. In Methods and Theories of Anthropological Genetics, ed. and . Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 19–38.Google Scholar
DiGangi, E. A. and Jantz, R. L. (2004). Dermatoglyphic ridge counts compared to short tandem repeats as measures of population distance. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement, 38, 87–88 (abstract)
(1999). Population substructure and isolation by distance in three continental regions. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 108, 147–593.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1989). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
, , , and (2001). Craniometric variation and the settlement of the Americas: Testing hypotheses by means of R-matrix and matrix correlation analyses. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 116, 154–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2004). Patterns of phenotypic covariation and correlation in modern humans as viewed from morphological integration. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 123, 69–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2003a). Boas's Changes in bodily form: the immigrant study, cranial plasticity, and Boas's physical anthropology. American Anthropologist, 105, 326–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003b). Heredity, environment, and cranial form: a reanalysis of Boas's immigrant data. American Anthropologist, 105, 125–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1973). Genetic distance among Southern African populations. In Methods and Theories of Anthropological Genetics, ed. and . Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 177–99.Google Scholar
and (1974).!Kung population structure. In Genetic Distance, ed. and . New York, NY: Plenum Press, pp. 137–65.Google Scholar
and (1982). Chemical systematics and human evolution. In Biochemical Aspects of Evolutionary Biology, ed. . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 213–56.Google Scholar
(1989). Skull Shapes and the Map: Craniometric Analyses in the Dispersion of Modern Homo. Papers of the Peabody Museum No. 79. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum, Harvard University.Google Scholar
(1996). Howells' craniometric data on the Internet. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 101, 441–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2000). The evolution of human skin coloration. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 57–106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1995). Population structure of Algonquian speakers. Human Biology, 67, 375–86Google ScholarPubMed
Konigsberg, L. W. (2000). Quantitative variation and genetics. In Human Biology: An Evolutionary and Biocultural Perspective, ed. , , and . New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, pp. 135–62.Google Scholar
Leigh, S. R., Relethford, J. H., Park, P. B. and Konigsberg, L. W. (2003). Morphological differentiation of Gorilla subspecies. In Gorilla Biology: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. and . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–31.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, D. H. (2000). Genetics, geography, and human variation. In Human Biology: An Evolutionary and Biocultural Perspective, ed. , , . New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, pp. 87–133.Google Scholar
(1995). Relationships between Eskimos, Amerindians, and Aleuts: Old data, new perspectives. Human Biology, 67, 427–58Google Scholar
and (1999). Craniofacial morphology of the first Americans: Pattern and process in the peopling of the New World. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 42, 153–883.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). Biological affinities between migrant and parental populations of fisherman on the east coast of India. Human Biology, 71, 803–22Google Scholar
, , and (2001). Population substructure and patterns of quantitative variation among the Gollas of Southern Andhra Pradesh, India. Human Biology, 73, 291–306CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1991). Genetic drift and anthropometric variation in Ireland. Human Biology, 63, 155–65Google ScholarPubMed
(1994). Craniometric variation among modern human populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 95, 53–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2001). Global analysis of regional differences in craniometric diversity and population substructure. Human Biology, 73, 629–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2002). Apportionment of global human genetic diversity based on craniometrics and skin color. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 118, 393–98CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Relethford, J. H. (2003a). Anthropometric data and population history. In Human Biologists in the Archives: Demography, Health, Nutrition and Genetics in Historical Populations, ed. and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–52.Google Scholar
(2003b). Reflections of Our Past: How Human History is Revealed in Our Genes. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
(2004a). Boas and beyond: migration and craniometric variation. American Journal of Human Biology, 16, 379–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b). Global patterns of isolation by distance based on genetic and morphological data. Human Biology, 76, 499–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990). Detection of differential gene flow from patterns of quantitative variation. Human Biology, 62, 5–25Google Scholar
and (1995). Anthropometric variation and the population history of Ireland. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 96, 25–38CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1997). Genetic drift and gene flow in post-famine Ireland. Human Biology, 69, 443–65Google ScholarPubMed
and (1994). Craniometric variation, genetic theory, and modern human origins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 95, 249–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1995). Ancient differences in population size can mimic a recent African origin of modern humans. Current Anthropology, 36, 667–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1982). The use of quantitative traits in the study of human population structure. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 25, 113–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1983). Population structure and quantitative characters. Genetics, 105, 985–1002Google ScholarPubMed
(2004). Detecting interregionally diversifying natural selection on modern human cranial form using matched molecular and morphometric data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 12824–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , , , and (2002). Genetic structure of human populations. Science, 298, 2381–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1988). Human Polymorphic Genes: World Distribution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1994). Morphological adaptations to climate in modern and fossil hominids. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 37, 65–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995). Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd edn. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
and (2002). A reassessment of human cranial plasticity: Boas revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 14636–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2003). Changing times, changes faces: Franz Boas's immigrant study in modern perspective. American Anthropologist, 105, 333–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). Mississippians in motion? A population genetic analysis of interregional gene flow in west-central Illinois. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 114, 61–733.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Craniometric variation and homogeneity in prehistoric/protohistoric Rapa Nui (Easter Island) regional populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 110, 407–193.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004). Population history of native groups in pre- and postcontact Spanish Florida: Aggregation, gene flow, and genetic drift on the Southeastern U.S. Atlantic coast. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 123, 316–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000). Comparison of population structure in Ohio's Late Archaic and Late Prehistoric periods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 112, 363–763.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002). Genetic drift and gene flow in a prehistoric population of the Azapa Valley and coast, Chile. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 118, 259–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). Anthropometric variation among the Sioux and the Assiniboine. Human Biology, 71, 847–58Google ScholarPubMed
and (1989). Anthropometric variation and the genetic structure of the Jirels of Nepal. Human Biology, 61, 1–12Google ScholarPubMed
Workman, P. L., Harpending, H., Lalouel, J. M., Lynch, C., Niswander, J. D. and Singleton, R. (1973). Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. VI. Papago population structure: a comparison of genetic and migration analyses. In Genetic Structure of Populations, ed. . Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii, pp. 166–94.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by