Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:20:18.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2023

Edited by
Katharine R. O'Reilly  and
Caterina Pellò
Katharine R. O'Reilly
Affiliation:
Toronto Metropolitan University
Caterina Pellò
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ancient Women Philosophers
Recovered Ideas and New Perspectives
 , pp. 247 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acker, C. 2002. Femmes, fêtes et philosophie en Grèce ancienne. Paris: Harmattan.Google Scholar
Adamson, P. 2016. A History of Philosophy without Any Gaps: Philosophy in the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adamson, P. 2022a. Don’t Think for Yourself: Authority and Belief in Medieval Philosophy. South Bend: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Adamson, P. 2022b. ‘Macrina’s Method: Reason and Reasoning in Gregory of Nyssa’s On Soul and Resurrection’, in Schulz, J. and Wilberding, J. (eds.), Women and the Female in Neoplatonism. Leiden: Brill, pp. 255–75.Google Scholar
Addey, C. 2014. Divination and Theurgy in Neoplatonism: Oracles of the Gods. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Addey, C. 2018a. ‘Plato’s Women Readers’, in Tarrant, H. et al. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 411–32.Google Scholar
Addey, C. 2018b. ‘Sosipatra: Prophetess, Philosopher and Theurgist: Reflections on Divination and Epistemology in Late Antiquity’, in Evans, R. (ed.), Prophets and Profits: Ancient Divination and Its Reception. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 144–62.Google Scholar
Aelian, . 1959. De Natura Animalium, A. F. Scholfield (tr.). Loeb Classical Library 449. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Allais, L. 2016. ‘Problematizing Western Philosophy as One Part of Africanising the Curriculum’, South African Journal of Philosophy 35(4): 537–45.Google Scholar
Allen, C. G. 1975. ‘Plato on Women’, Feminist Studies 2: 131–38.Google Scholar
Allen, R. E. (tr.). 1991. Dialogues of Plato, ii: Symposium. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1976. ‘Plato’s Republic and Feminism’, Philosophy 51: 307–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antognazza, M. R. 2015. ‘The Benefit to Philosophy of the Study of its History’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23(1): 161–84.Google Scholar
Appell, L. 1988. ‘Menstruation among the Rungus of Borneo: An Unmarked Category’, in Buckley, T. and Gottlieb, P. (eds.), Blood Magic: The Anthropology of Menstruation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Appleton, N. 2017. Shared Characters in Jain, Buddhist and Hindu Narrative: Gods, Kings, and Other Heroes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arenson, K. 2016. ‘Epicureans on Marriage as Sexual Therapy’, Polis 33: 291–311.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1942. Generation of Animals, A. L. Peck (tr.). London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. Historia Animalium, D’A. W. Thompson (tr.) in Barnes, J. (ed.), Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1991. History of Animals Books VII–X, D. M. Balme (tr.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. (tr.). 1984. Plotinus in Seven Volumes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 1996. ‘The Stoics on Women’, in Ward, J. (ed.), Feminism and Ancient Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 68–92.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, P. (ed. and tr.). 1999. Damascius. The Philosophical History. Athens: Apamea.Google Scholar
Baltzly, D. (tr.). 2009. Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Vol. 4: Proclus on the World Soul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baltzly, D. 2013. ‘Proclus and Theodore of Asine on Female Philosopher-Rulers: Patriarchy, Metempsychosis and Women in the Neoplatonic Commentary Tradition’, Ancient Philosophy 33: 403–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ban, Z. 2013a. ‘Memorial to Empress Dowager Deng’, in Fan, Y. et al. (eds.), The Book of the Later Han (Houhanshu 後漢書), vol. 84. Reprinted with modern Chinese translation, introduction, notes, commentary in Lianke, Wen et al. Xinyi Houhanshu. Taipei: Sanmin shuju.Google Scholar
Ban, Z. 2013b. ‘Petition for a Replacement for My Elder Brother Chao’ in Fan, Y. et al. (eds.), The Book of the Later Han (Houhanshu 後漢書), vol. 48. Reprinted with modern Chinese translation, introduction, notes, commentary in Lianke, Wen et al. Xinyi Houhanshu. Taipei: Sanmin shuju.Google Scholar
Ban, Z. 2018. ‘Lessons for Women’, in Pang-White, A. A. (tr. and ed.), The Confucian Four Books for Women – A New Translation of the Nü Sishu and the Commentary of Wang Xiang. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–67.Google Scholar
Ban, Z. 2021a. ‘Rhapsody on a Journey to the East’, in Xiao, T. (ed.), Wenxuan 文選 (aka Zhaoming wenxuan 昭明文選), vol. 3. https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&res=91990.Google Scholar
Ban, Z. 2021b. ‘Rhapsody on Needle and Thread’, in Ouyang, X. (ed.), Yiwen leiju 藝文類聚, vol. 65. https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&res=5982.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2015. ‘Pythagorean Harmonics’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–203.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. 2021. ‘Aristotle’s Biology and Early Medicine’, in Connell, S. M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 2006. The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S., and Wray, D. (eds.). 2009. Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bar On, B.-A. 1994. Engendering Origins. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Beagon, P. M. 1995. ‘The Cappadocian Fathers, Women and Ecclesiastical Politics’, Vigiliae Christianae 49(2): 165–79.Google Scholar
Belo, C. 2009. ‘Some Considerations on Averroes’ Views Regarding Women and Their Role in Society’, Journal of Islamic Studies 20: 1–20.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. 1986/87. ‘The Generalized and the Concrete Other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Controversy and Feminist Theory’, in Benhabib, S. and Cornell, D. (eds.), Praxis International, Special Issue On Feminist Theory, pp. 38–60; Reprinted in Kittay, E. F. and Meyers, D. (eds.). Women and Moral Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 154–78.Google Scholar
Benson, P. J. 1992. The Invention of the Renaissance Woman: The Challenge of Female Independence in the Literature and Thought of Italy and England. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. 1997. ‘Philosophy’s Paradoxical Parochialism: The Reinvention of Philosophy as Greek,’ in Ansell-Pearson, K., Parry, B., and Squires, J. (eds.), Cultural Readings of Imperialism. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 212–26.Google Scholar
Berthelot, M. 1888. Collection des Alchemistes Grecs. Paris: George Steinheil.Google Scholar
Black, B. 2007a. The Character of the Self in Ancient India: Priests, Kings, and Women in the Early Upaniṣads. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Black, B. 2007b. ‘Eavesdropping on the Epic: Female Listeners in the Mahābhārata’, in Brodbeck, S. and Black, B. (eds.), Gender and Narrative in the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge, pp. 53–78.Google Scholar
Black, B. 2013. ‘Draupadī in the Mahābhārata’, Religion Compass, 7(5): 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, B. 2015a. ‘Dialogue and Difference: Encountering the Other in Indian Religious and Philosophical Sources’, in Black, B. and Patton, L. (eds.), Dialogue in Early South Asian Religions: Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain Traditions. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 243–57.Google Scholar
Black, B. 2015b. ‘The Upanishads’, The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, ISSN 2161-0002. https://iep.utm.edu/.Google Scholar
Black, B. 2017. ‘The Upaniṣads and the Mahābhārata’, in Cohen, S. (ed.), The Upaniṣads: A Complete Guide. New York: Routledge, pp. 186–99.Google Scholar
Black, B. 2021a. In Dialogue with the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Black, B. 2021b. ‘Through the Eyes of Ulūpī: A Distinctive Snake Perspective in the Mahābhārata’, Journal of Hindu Studies 15: 83–105.Google Scholar
Black, B. 2022. ‘Politics without Fear: King Janaka and Sovereignty in the Mahābhārata’, Religions 13(10): 898. doi.org/10.3390/rel13100898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, K. R. 1998. Women in the Footsteps of the Buddha. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blair, E. D. 2012. Plato’s Dialectic on Woman: Equal, Therefore Inferior. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blundell, S. 1995. Women in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bonelli, M. 2020. Filosofe, Maestre e Imperatrici. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Bose, C. K. 2017. ‘The El-Lahun gynaecological papyrus’, Hektoen International: A Journal of Medical Humanities 9(2). https://hekint.org/2017/01/27/the-el-lahun-gynecological-papyrus/.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. 1997. Tragic Seneca: An Essay in the Theatrical Tradition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. M. 1990. ‘Adolescents, Symposion, and Pederasty’, in Murray, O. (ed.), Sympotica. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 135–49.Google Scholar
Brill, S. 2015. ‘Animality and Sexual Difference in the Timaeus’, in Bell, J. and Naas, M. (eds.), Plato’s Animals: Gadflies, Horses, Swans, and Other Philosophical Beasts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 161–75.Google Scholar
Brill, S. and McKeen, C. Forthcoming. The Routledge Handbook on Women and Ancient Greek Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2019. ‘Practical Truth in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 57: 249–72.Google Scholar
Brodbeck, S., and Black, B. 2007. Gender and Narrative in the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, V. (ed.). 2001. Famous Women. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, W. 1988. ‘Supposing Truth Were a Woman: Plato’s Subversion of Masculine Discourse’, Political Theory 16: 594–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchan, M. 1999. Women in Plato’s Political Theory. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1992. The Orientalising Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burrus, V. 2000. ‘Begotten, Not Made’: Conceiving Manhood in Late Antiquity. Redwood: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Burrus, V. 2001. ‘Is Macrina a Woman? Gregory of Nyssa’s Dialogue on the Soul and Resurrection’, in Ward, G. (ed.), The Companion to Postmodern Theology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 249–64.Google Scholar
Bury, R. G. 1932. The Symposium of Plato. Edited with Introduction, Critical Notes and Commentary. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Busch, A. 2009. ‘Dissolution of the Self in the Senecan Corpus’, in Bartsch, S. and Wray, D. (eds.), Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 255–82.Google Scholar
Buxton, R., and Whiting, L. 2020. Philosopher Queens. London: Unbound.Google Scholar
Caizzi, F. D. 1993. ‘The Porch and the Garden: Early Hellenistic Images of the Philosophical Life’, in Bulloch, A., Gruen, E., Long, A. A., and Stewart, A. (eds.), Images and Ideologies: Self-Definition in the Hellenistic World. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 303–29.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1999. The Poetics of Eros in Ancient Greece. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Callahan, V. W. (tr.) 1967. The Fathers of the Church: St. Gregory of Nyssa Ascetical Works. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, A., and Long, J. 1993. Barbarians and Politics at the Court of Arcadius. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cantor, L. 2022. ‘Thales – the “First Philosopher”? A Troubled Chapter in the Historiography of Philosophy’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy. DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2022.2029347.Google Scholar
Castelli, E. 1986. ‘Virginity and Its Meaning for Women’s Sexuality in Early Christianity’, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 2(1): 61–88.Google Scholar
Castner, C. 1982. ‘Epicurean Hetairai as Dedicants to Healing Deities?’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 23: 51–57.Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 1990. Pseudopythagorica Ethica. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 2014. ‘The Pseudo-Pythagorean Writings’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 315–40.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, A. 2014. ‘Just Words: An Ethics of Conversation in the Mahābhārata’, in Chakrabarti, A. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (eds.), Mahābhārata Now: Narration, Aesthetics, Ethics. New Delhi: Routledge, pp. 244–83.Google Scholar
Chakravarti, U. 2014. ‘Who Speaks for Whom? The Queen, the Dāsī and Sexual Politics in the Sabhāparvan’, in Chakrabarti, A. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (eds.), Mahābhārata Now: Narration, Aesthetics, Ethics. New Delhi: Routledge, pp. 132–52.Google Scholar
Chemello, A. 1983. ‘La donna, il modello, l’immaginario: Moderata Fonte e Lucrezia Marinella’, in Zancan, M. (ed.), Nel cerchio della luna: figure di donna in alcuni testi del XVI secolo. Venice: Marsilio, pp. 59–170.Google Scholar
Chouinard, I., McConaughey, Z., Medeiros Ramos, A., and Noel, R. (eds.) 2021. Women’s Perspectives on Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, A. B. 2020. ‘Epicureans on Friendship, Politics, and Community’, in Arenson, K. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 307–18.Google Scholar
Cixous, H. 1976. ‘The Laugh of the Medusa’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1: 875–93.Google Scholar
Clark, E. A. 1998. ‘The Lady Vanishes: Dilemmas of a Feminist Historian after the “Linguistic Turn”’, Church History, 67(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
Clay, D. 2009. ‘The Athenian Garden’, in Warren, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. 2008. Text and Authority in the Older Upaniṣads. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. 2018. The Upanishads. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cole, S. 1981. ‘Could Greek Women Read and Write?’ Women’s Studies 8: 129–55. Reprinted in Foley, H. (ed.), Reflections of Women in Antiquity. London: Routledge, pp. 219–45.Google Scholar
Connell, S. M. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals: A Study of the Generation of Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connell, S. M. 2019. ‘Nurture and Parenting in Aristotelian Ethics’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 2: 119.Google Scholar
Connell, S. M. 2021. ‘Women in Science’, in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://oxfordre.com/classics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-8584;jsessionid=6B7B03197DD49A5F6441B84586BD8D3B.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (ed.) 1997. Plato. Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 2012. Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cox Miller, P. 1983. Biography in Late Antiquity: A Quest for the Holy Man. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox Miller, P. 2000. ‘Strategies of Representation in Collective Biography: Constructing the Subject as Holy’, in Hägg, T., Rousseau, P., and Høgel, C., (eds.), Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Oakland: University of California Press, pp. 209–55.Google Scholar
Craik, E. 2015. The Hippocratic Corpus: Content and Context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crawford, F. S. (ed.) 1953. Averroes. Averrois Cordubensis Commentarium magnum in Aristotelis De anima libros. Cambridge, MA: Mediaeval Academy of America.Google Scholar
Dalmiya, V. and Mukherji, G. 2018. ‘Introduction: To Do’, in Bhattacharya, S. C., Dalmiya, V., and Mukherji, G. (eds.), Exploring Agency in the Mahābhārata: Ethical and Political Dimensions of Dharma. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
D’Angour, A. 2019. Socrates in Love: The Making of a Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darling, D. 2004. The Universal Book of Mathematics: From Abracadabra to Zeno’s Paradoxes. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Deakin, M. A. B. 2007. Hypatia of Alexandria. Mathematician and Martyr. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L. 1992. ‘The Politics of Pleasure: Female Sexual Appetite in the Hippocratic Corpus’, Helios 19: 72–91.Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L. 1994. Women’s Bodies in Ancient Greek Science. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L. 1995. ‘Autopsia, Historia, and What Women Know: The Authority of Women in Hippocratic Gynaecology’, in Bates, D. (ed.), Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–59.Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L. 2012. ‘Clinical Gynecology and Aristotle’s Biology: The Composition of HA X’, Apeiron 45: 180–99.Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L. 2018. ‘Female Patients,’ in Pormann, P. E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hippocrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 246–62.Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L. Forthcoming. Historia Animalium Book X: Aristotle Endoxon, Topos, and Dialectic On Failure to Reproduce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, S. 1949/1952. The Second Sex. Translated and edited by Parshley, H. M.. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
De Cesaris, G., and Horky, P. S. 2018. ‘Hellenistic Pythagorean Epistemology’, in Verde, F. and Catapano, M. (eds.), special issue of Lexicon Philosophicum: Hellenistic Theories of Knowledge: 221–62.Google Scholar
Deming, W. 2004. Paul on Marriage and Celibacy: The Hellenistic Background of 1 Corinthians 7. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Denzey Lewis, N. 2014. ‘Living Images of the Divine: Female Theurgists in Late Antiquity’, in Stratton, K. B. and Kalleres, D. S. (eds.), Daughters of Hecate: Women and Magic in the Ancient World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 274–93.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1972. ‘Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences’, in Macksey, R. and Donato, E. (eds.), The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 247–65.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, M. 2012. ‘Women, Education, and Philosophy,’ in James, S. L. and Dillon, S. (eds.), A Companion to Women in the Ancient World. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 343–53.Google Scholar
Des Places, E. 1987. Jamblique. Protreptique. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. 2016. ‘Ancient Biography and Formalities of Fiction,’ in De Temmerman, D. and Demoen, D. (eds.), Writing Biography in Greece and Rome: Narrative Technique and Fictionalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhand, A. 2007. ‘Paradigms of the Good in the Mahābhārata: Śuka and Sulabhā in Quagmires of Ethics’, in Brodbeck, S. and Black, B. (eds.), Gender and Narrative in the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge, pp. 258–78.Google Scholar
Dhand, A. 2008. Woman as Fire, Woman as Sage: Sexual Ideology in the Mahābhārata. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Dhand, A. 2018. ‘Karmayoga and the Vexed Moral Agent’, in Bhattacharya, S. C., Dalmiya, V., and Mukherji, G. (eds.), Exploring Agency in the Mahābhārata: Ethical and Political Dimensions of Dharma. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 81–106.Google Scholar
Dickason, A. 1973–74. ‘Anatomy and Destiny: The Role of Biology in Plato’s View of Women’, Philosophical Forum 5: 44–53.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1985. ‘Female Principles in Platonism’, Itaca 1, 107–23.Google Scholar
Diogenes Laertius, . 1925/1972. Lives of Eminent Philosophers (D.L.) tr. R. D. Hicks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1945. ‘Plato and the Irrational’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 65: 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnison, D. 1988. Midwives and Medical Men: A History of the Struggle for the Control of Childbirth. New Barnet: Historical Publications.Google Scholar
Dotson, K. 2012. ‘How Is This Paper Philosophy?’, Comparative Philosophy 3(1): 3–29.Google Scholar
Dover, K. 1978. Greek Homosexuality. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dover, K. 1980. Plato: Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, N. 2018. Maternal Bodies: Redefining Motherhood in Early America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Drury, J. L. 2005. ‘Gregory of Nyssa’s Dialogue with Macrina: The Compatibility of Resurrection of the Body and Immortality of the Soul’, Theology Today 62(2): 210–22.Google Scholar
du Bois, P. 1988. Sowing the Body: Psychoanalysis and Ancient Representations of Women. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
du Bois, P. 1994. ‘The Platonic Appropriation of Reproduction’, in Tuana, N. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park: Pennslyvania State University Press, pp. 139–57.Google Scholar
Dunhill, A. (tr.). 1999. Lucrezia Marinella: The Nobility and the Excellence of Women and the Defects of Men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dutsch, D. M. 2020. Pythagorean Women Philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzielska, M. 1995. Hypatia of Alexandria, tr. F. Lyra. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Elm, S. 1994. ‘Virgins of God’: The Making of Asceticism in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
El Murr, D. 2020. ‘Eristic, Antilogy, and the Equal Disposition of Men and Women (Resp. 5. 453b–454c)’, Classical Quarterly 70(1): 85–100.Google Scholar
Eusebius of Caesarea, . 1903. Praeparatio Evangelica (PE), tr. E. H. Gifford. Oxford: Typographeo Academico.Google Scholar
Evans, N. 2006. ‘Diotima and Demeter as Mystagogues in Plato’s Symposium’, Hypatia 21(2): 1–27.Google Scholar
Falk, Nancy. 1977. ‘Draupadī and the Dharma’, in Gross, R. M. (ed.), Beyond Androcentrism: New Essays on Women and Religion. Missoula: Scholars Press, pp. 89–114.Google Scholar
Fan, Y. et al. 范曄 (eds.). 2021. The Book of the Later Han (Houhanshu 後漢書), 120 or 130 vols. (depending on editions). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_the_Later_Han, or https://ctext.org/hou-han-shu/zh. Reprinted with modern Chinese translation, introduction, notes, commentary in Lianke, Wen et al. 2013. Xinyi Houhanshu. Taipei: Sanmin shuju.Google Scholar
Faucette, A. 2014. ‘Fucking the Binary for Social Change: Our Radically Queer Agenda’, Counterpoints: The Gay Agenda: Claiming Space, Identity, Justice 437: 73–88.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. (ed.) 1970. Proclus: Commentaire sur la République. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. 2009. Seneca’s Hercules Furens: A Critical Text with Introduction and Commentary. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. L. 2002. ‘Nun Befuddles King, Shows Karmayoga Does Not Work: Sulabhā’s Refutation of King Janaka at MBh 12.308’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 30(6): 641–77.Google Scholar
Flemming, F. 2007. ‘Women, Writing and Medicine in the Classical World’, Classical Quarterly 5: 257–79.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1985. A History of Sexuality: The Use of Pleasure, vol 2. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Frank, G. 2000. ‘Macrina’s Scar: Homeric Allusion and Heroic Identity in Gregory of Nyssa’s Life of Macrina’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 8(3): 511–30.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1993. ‘Out of the Cave: What Socrates Learnt from Diotima’, in Rosen, R. M. and Farrell, J. (eds.), Nomodeiktes: Greek Studies in Honour of Martin Ostwald. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 397–422.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 2018. ‘Equal But Not Equal: Plato and Aristotle on Women as Citizens’ in Santas, G. and Anagnostopoulos, G. (eds.), Democracy, Justice, and Equality in Ancient Greece: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeland, C. A. 1998. Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, M., and Hornsby, J. (eds.). 2000. The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. 1982. The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1985. Philosophical Apprenticeships. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1972. The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gardner, C. 2000. ‘The Remnants of the Family: The Role of Women and Eugenics in Republic V’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 17: 217–35.Google Scholar
Gaut, B. 1998. ‘Just Joking: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Humour’, Philosophy and Literature 22(1): 55–68.Google Scholar
Gertz, S. 2014. ‘Dream Divination and the Neoplatonic Search for Salvation’, in Russell, D. A. and Nesselrath, H.-G. (eds.), On Prophecy, Dream and Human Imagination. Synesius, De insomniis. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 111–24.Google Scholar
Gertz, S. 2020. ‘“A Mere Geometer?” Hypatia in the Context of Alexandrian Neoplatonism’, in Norman, D. L. and Petkas, A. (eds.), Hypatia of Alexandria. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 133–51.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (ed.). 1990. Socratis et Socraticorum Reliquiae (SSR). 4 vols. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. 1982. In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, L. 2016. ‘Jocasta’s Catilinarian Oration (Sen. Phoen. 632–43)’, Classical Journal 4: 483–94.Google Scholar
Gloyn, L. 2017. The Ethics of the Family in Seneca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. 2004. ‘Remembering the Garden: The Trouble with Women in the School of Epicurus’, in Fitzgerald, J., Obbink, D., and Holland, G. (eds.), Philodemus and the New Testament World. Leiden: Brill, pp. 221–43.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. 2012. The Invention and Gendering of Epicurus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Granholm, P. 2012. ‘Alciphron: Letters of the Courtesans’, unpublished PhD thesis, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Grant, J. 1994. Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graver, M. 2001. Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, C. 2020. Beyond Gender Binaries: An Intersectional Orientation to Communication and Identities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 1976. Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 1986a. ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: I’, Greece & Rome 33: 64–77.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 1986b. ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: II’, Greece & Rome 33: 192–202.Google Scholar
Guarducci, M. 1974. ‘La Statua di “Sant Ippolito” in Vaticano’, Rendiconti, Pontificia Accademia Romana di Archeologia 47: 163–90.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1987. Philosophy as a Way of Life, Davidson, A. (ed.) M. Chase (tr.). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hallisey, C. 2015. Therigatha: Poems of the First Buddhist Women. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. 1989. ‘Why Is Diotima a Woman?’, in Halperin, D. (ed.), One Hundred Years of Homosexuality. New York: Routledge, pp. 113–53.Google Scholar
Hanson, A. 1991. ‘Continuity and Change: Three Case Studies in Hippocratic Gynaecological Therapy and Theory’, in Pomeroy, S. (ed.), Women’s History and Ancient History. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 73–110.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1991. ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, in Haraway, D., Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 183–201.Google Scholar
Harich-Schwarzbauer, H. (ed. and tr.) 2011. Hypatia. Die spätantiken Quellen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Harrison, V. S. 2012. Eastern Philosophy: The Basics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harry, C., and Polansky, R. 2016. ‘Plato on Women’s Natural Ability: Revisiting Republic V and Timaeus 41e3–44d2 and 86b1–92c3’, Apeiron 49: 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, S. 2008. ‘Changing the Ideology and Culture of Philosophy: Not by Reason (Alone)’, Hypatia 23(2): 210–23.Google Scholar
Hawley, R. 1994. ‘The Problem of Women Philosophers in Ancient Greece’, in Archer, L. J., Fischler, S., and Wyke, M. (eds.), Women in Ancient Societies: An Illusion of the Night. New York: Routledge, pp. 70–87.Google Scholar
He, Z. 2013. ‘On the Revenge of Women’, in Liu, L., Karl, R., and Ko, D. (tr. and eds.), The Birth of Chinese Feminism: Essential Texts in Transnational Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 105–68.Google Scholar
Helleman, W. E. 2001. ‘Cappadocian Macrina as Lady Wisdom’, Studia Patristica 37: 86–102.Google Scholar
Henry, D., and Nielsen, K. 2015. ‘Introduction’, in Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Henry, M. 1997. Prisoner of History: Aspasia of Miletus and her Biographical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, L. 2001. ‘The First Wave of Feminism: Were the Stoics Feminists?’ History of Political Thought 22: 13–40.Google Scholar
Hiltebeitel, A. 2000. ‘Draupadī’s Question’, in Hiltebeitel, A. and Erndl, K. (eds.), Is the Goddess a Feminist? The Politics of South Asian Goddesses. New York: New York University Press, pp. 113–22.Google Scholar
Hine, H. (tr.). 2014. ‘Consolation to Marcia’, in Lucius Annaeus Seneca: Hardship & Happiness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hippocrates, . 2010–18. Works, Volumes IX–XI, tr. P. Potter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press [Loeb].Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2013. ‘In Strange Lands. Disembodied Authority and the Role of the Physician in the Hippocratic Corpus and Beyond’, in Asper, M. (ed.), Writing Science. Medical and Mathematical Authorship in Ancient Greece. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 431–72.Google Scholar
Horky, P. S. 2015. ‘Pseudo-Archytas’ Protreptics? On Wisdom in its Contexts’, in Nails, D. and Tarrant, H. (eds.), Second Sailing. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
Horky, P. S. 2020. ‘Anonymus Iamblichi, On Excellence (Peri Aretēs): A Lost Defense of Democracy’, in Wolfsdorf, D. (ed.), Early Greek Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 262–92.Google Scholar
Hösle, V. 2012. The Philosophical Dialogue: A Poetics and Hermeneutics, tr. Steven Rendall. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hotz, K. G. 2001. ‘Speaking Funk: Womanist Insights into the Lives of Syncletica and Macrina’, in Holmes, E. A. and Farley, W., (eds.), Women, Writing, Theology: Transforming a Tradition of Exclusion. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, pp. 71–94.Google Scholar
Howard, V. R. 2019. The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Indian Philosophy and Gender. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Howe, J. 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Islam and Gender. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huffman, C.A. (ed.). 2014. A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2019a. Aristoxenus of Tarentum. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2019b. ‘Pythagoreanism’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/pythagoreanism/.Google Scholar
Huizenga, A. 2013. Moral Education for Women in the Pastoral and Pythagorean Letters. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Hult, D. F. (tr.) 2010. Debate of the Romance of the Rose. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hultsch, F. O. 1882. Griechische und römische Metrologie. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Humbert, J. 1960. Syntaxe Grecque. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. S., and Johnson, M. R. 2005. ‘Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus’, Oxford Studies of Ancient Philosophy 29: 193–293.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. S., and Johnson, M. R. 2017. Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Hutton, S. 2019. ‘Women, Philosophy, and the History of Philosophy’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27(4): 684–701.Google Scholar
Idema, W., and Grant, B. (eds.) 2004. The Red Brush: Writing Women of Imperial China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Centre.Google Scholar
Iles Johnstone, S. 2016. ‘Sosipatra and the Theurgic Life: Eunapius Vitae Sophistorum 6.6.5–6.9.24’, in Rüpke, J. and Spickermann, W. (eds.), Reflections on Religious Individuality. Greco-Roman and Judaeo-Christian Texts and Practices. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 99–117.Google Scholar
Irigaray, L. 1989. ‘Sorcerer Love: A Reading of Plato’s Symposium, Diotima’s Speech’, Hypatia 3(3): 32–44.Google Scholar
Jacobs, W. 1978. ‘Plato on Emancipation and the Traditional Family’, Apeiron 12: 29–31.Google Scholar
Jamison, S. 1996. Sacrificed Wife, Sacrificer’s Wife: Women, Ritual, and Hospitality in Ancient India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jayne, S. (tr.). 1944. Marsilio Ficino’s Commentary on Plato’s Symposium. Columbia: University of Missouri.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P. 1998. ‘Daughter, Sister, Philosopher, Angel: The Life and Influence of St. Macrina the Younger’, Diakonia 31(3): 176–86.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 2015. ‘Aristotle’s Architectonic Sciences’, in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–86.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. 1997. ‘Forms of Individuals in Plotinus: A Re-Examination’, Phronesis 42: 206–27.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. 2006. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. F. 2014. Immigrant Women in Athens: Gender, Ethnicity, and Citizenship in the Classical City. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. F. 2015. ‘Elite Citizen Women and the Origins of the Hetaira in Classical Athens’, Helios 42(1): 61–79.Google Scholar
Ker, J. 2009. The Deaths of Seneca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kersey, E. M. 1989. Women Philosophers: A Bio-critical Sourcebook. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
King, H. 1985. ‘From Parthenos to Gyne: the dynamics of category’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
King, H. 1986. ‘Agnodike and the Profession of Medicine’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 32(212): 53–77.Google Scholar
King, H. 1998. Hippocrates’ Woman: Reading the Female Body in Ancient Greece. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
King, M. L. 1991. Women of the Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. 1995. Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, E. F., and Meyers, D. (eds.). 1987. Women and Moral Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 154–78.Google Scholar
Kolsky, S. D. 2001. ‘Moderata Fonte, Lucrezia Marinella, Giuseppe Passi: An Early Seventeenth-Century Feminist Controversy’, The Modern Language Review 96: 973–89.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (ed.). 1899. Procli Diadochi in Platonis rem publicam commentarii, vol.I. Leipzig: Nabu Press.Google Scholar
Kutash, E. 2011. The Ten Gifts of the Demiurge. Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Bristol: Classical Press.Google Scholar
Laale, H. W. 2011. Ephesus (Ephesos): An Abbreviated History from Androclus to Constantine XI. Bloomington, IN: Westbow.Google Scholar
Lagarde, B. 1973. ‘Le De differentiis de Pléthon d’après l’autographe de la Marcienne’. Byzantion 43: 312–43.Google Scholar
Lampe, K. 2015. The Birth of Hedonism: The Cyrenaic Philosophers and Pleasure as a Way of Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lampe, K. 2016. ‘The Life of Aristippus in the Socratic Epistles: Three Interpretations’, in Hanink, J. and Fletcher, R. (eds.), Creative Lives in Classical Antiquity: Poets, Artists, and Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 198–218.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R., and Fant, M. B. (eds.). 2005. Women’s Life in Greece and Rome: A Source Book in Translation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Leitao, D. D. 2012. The Pregnant Male as Myth and Metaphor in Classical Greek Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, R. (tr.) 1974. Averroes on Plato’s Republic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lesser, H. 1979. ‘Plato’s Feminism’. Philosophy 54: 113–17.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2021. ‘Empiricism and Hearsay in Aristotle’s Zoological Collection of Facts’, in Connell, S. M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, H. S. 1940. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lindquist, S. E. 2008. ‘Gender at Janaka’s Court’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 36: 405–26.Google Scholar
Lindsay, J. 1970. The Origins of Alchemy in Greco-Roman Egypt. London: Muller.Google Scholar
Littré, E. 1839–61. Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrates. Paris: J. B. Baillière [L.].Google Scholar
Liu, L., Karl, R., and Ko, D. (tr. and eds.) 2013. The Birth of Chinese Feminism: Essential Texts in Transnational Theory. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1983. Science, Folklore, and Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1987. ‘Empirical Research in Aristotle’s Biology,’ in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–64.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2005. ‘“Philosophy”: What Did the Greeks Invent and Is It Relevant to China?’ Extrême-orient, Extrême-occident 27: 149–60.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2014. ‘Pythagoras’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–45.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1987. Tragic Ways of Killing a Woman, tr. A. Forster. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lovibond, S. 2000. ‘Feminism in Ancient Philosophy: The Feminist Stake in Greek Rationalism’, in Fricker, M. and Hornsby, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10–28.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. 1947. ‘Musonius Rufus: The Roman Socrates’, Yale Classical Studies 10: 1–147.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Macksey, R., and Donato, E. (eds.) 1972. The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Macris, C. 2002. ‘Jamblique et la Littérature Pseudo-Pythagoricienne’, in Mimouni, S. C. (ed.), Apocryphité. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 77–129.Google Scholar
Macris, C. 2012. ‘Périctionè (d’Athènes?)’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques V. Paris: CNRS, pp. 231–34.Google Scholar
Malherbe, A. J. (ed.). 1977/2006. The Cynic Epistles: A Study Edition. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press for the Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Malinar, A. 2007. ‘Arguments of a Queen: Draupadī’s View on Kingship’, in Brodbeck, S. and Black, B. (eds.), Gender and Narrative in the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Mann, S., and Cheng, Y. (eds.) 2001. Under Confucian Eyes: Writings on Gender in Chinese History. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mann, W.-R. 1996. ‘The Life of Aristippus’, in Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 78: 97–119.Google Scholar
Mann, W.-R. 2006. ‘Learning How to Die: Seneca’s Use of Aeneid 4.653 at Epistulae Morales 12.9’, in Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds.), Seeing Seneca Whole: Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics. Leiden: Brill, pp. 104–22.Google Scholar
Mann, W.-R. 2015. ‘“You’re Playing You Now”: Helvidius Priscus as a Stoic Hero’, in Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds.), Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–37.Google Scholar
Mannebach, E. 1961. Aristippi et cyrenaicorum fragmenta. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Manning, C. E. 1973. ‘Seneca and the Stoics on the Equality of the Sexes’, Mnemosyne 26: 170–77.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J., and Runia, D. 1997. Aëtiana I. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Manuli, P. 1983. ‘Donne masculine, femmine sterili, vergini perpetue: La ginecologia greca tra Ippocrate e Sorano’, in Campese, S., Manuli, P., and Sissa, G. (eds.), Madre Materia. Turin: Boringhieri, 149–204.Google Scholar
Marinella, L. 1600, 1601, 1621. La nobilta et eccellenza delle donne co’ difetti et mancamenti de gli huomini. Venice: Presso Gio.Google Scholar
Marshack, A. 1972. The Roots of Civilization: The Cognitive Beginning of Man’s First Art, Symbol. and Notation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Matilal, B. K. 2002. ‘Dharma and Rationality’, in Ganeri, J. (ed.), Ethics and Epics: Philosophy, Culture, and Religion. The Collected Essays of Bimal Krishna Matilal, vol. 2. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Mauch, M. 1997. Senecas Frauenbild in den Philosophischen Schriften. Frankfurt: P. Lang.Google Scholar
McKeen, C. 2006. ‘Why Women Must Guard and Rule in Plato’s Kallipolis’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87: 527–48.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. D. 1994. Philosophy before Socrates. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Mcnary-Zak, B. 2005. ‘Gregory of Nyssa and His Sister Macrina: A Holy Alliance’, Cithara 45(1): 3–12.Google Scholar
Ménage, G. 1984. The History of Women Philosophers. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 2002. ‘Plato and the Method of Analysis’, Phronesis 47: 193–223.Google Scholar
Mesytas, S. 2012. ‘Iamblichus’ Exegesis of Parmenides’ Hypotheses and His Doctrine of Divine Henads’, in Afonasin, E., Dillon, J., and Finamore, J. (eds.), Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism. Leiden: Brill, pp. 151–76.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1971. ‘Second Thoughts on Greek Biography’, Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afd. Letterkunde 34(7): 245–57.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1987. On Pagans, Jews, and Christians. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1993. The Development of Greek Biography: Expanded Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Monfasani, J. 2002. ‘Marsilio Ficino and the Plato-Aristotle Controversy’, in Allen, M. J. B. and Rees, V. (eds.), Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy. Leiden: Brill, pp. 179–202.Google Scholar
Montepaone, C. 2011. Pitagoriche. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Motto, A. L. 1972. ‘Seneca on Women’s Liberation’, Classical World 65: 155–57.Google Scholar
Motto, A. L., and Clark, J. R. 1981. ‘Maxima Virtus in Seneca’s Hercules Furens’, Classical Philology 76: 101–17.Google Scholar
Mozans, H. J. (J. A. Zahm). 1913. Women of Science. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Muehlberger, E. 2012. ‘Salvage: Macrina and the Christian Project of Cultural Reclamation’, Church History, 81(2): 273–97.Google Scholar
Nails, D. 1989. ‘The Pythagorean Women Philosophers: Ethics of the Household’, in Boudouris, K. J. (ed.), Ionian Philosophy. Athens: International Association for Greek Philosophy, pp. 291–97.Google Scholar
Noy, D. 2013. ‘Matchmaker’, in Bagnall, R. S. et al. (eds.), The Encyclopaedia of Ancient History. Oxford: Blackwell, 43–44.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1979. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1986. ‘Therapeutic Arguments: Epicurus and Aristotle’, in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–74.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2002. ‘The Incomplete Feminism of Musonius Rufus: Platonist, Stoic, and Roman’, in Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J. (eds.), The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: pp. 283–326.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2009. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, A. 1989. ‘The Hidden Host: Irigaray and Diotima at Plato’s Symposium’ Hypatia: French Feminist Philosophy 3(3): 45–61.Google Scholar
Nye, A. 1990. ‘The Subject of Love: Diotima and her Critics’, Journal of Value Inquiry 24: 135–53.Google Scholar
O’Brien, C. 2016. ‘Plotinus on the Soul’s logos as the Structuring Principle of the World’, in Halfwassen, J., Dangel, T., and O’Brien, C. (eds.), Seele und Materie im Neuplatonismus. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, pp. 105–35.Google Scholar
O’Brien Wicker, K. (tr.). 1987. Porphyry. To Marcella. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Okin, S. 1977. ‘Philosopher Queens and Private Wives: Plato on Women and the Family’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 6: 345–69.Google Scholar
Okin, S. 1979. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, S. 1989. Justice, Labour and the Family. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, G., Horn-Schott, M., Hartley, D., Schmidt, R. L. (eds.). 2019. Beyond Gender: An Advanced Introduction to the Futures of Feminist and Sexuality Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 2003. Platonopolis. Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OutlawJr., L. T. 2017. ‘Africana Philosophy’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/africana/.Google Scholar
Ouyang, X. 歐陽詢 (ed.). 2021. Yiwen leiju 藝文類聚, 100 vols. https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&res=5982.Google Scholar
Pang-White, A. A. 2016. The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Chinese Philosophy and Gender. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pang-White, A. A. (tr. and ed.). 2018. The Confucian Four Books for Women: A New Translation of the Nü Sishu and the Commentary of Wang Xiang. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panizza, L., and Wood, S. (eds.) 2000. A History of Women’s Writing in Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, P. 2013. Africa, Asia, and the History of Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Patai, R. 1982. ‘Maria the Jewess: Founding Mother of Alchemy’, Ambix 29: 177–97.Google Scholar
Patton, L. 2007. ‘How Do You Conduct Yourself? Gender and the Construction of a Dialogical Self in the Mahābhārata’, in Brodbeck, S. and Black, B. (eds.), Gender and Narrative in the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge, pp. 97–109.Google Scholar
Pelikan, J. 1993. Christianity and Classical Culture: The Metamorphosis of Natural Theology in the Christian Encounter with Hellenism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pellò, C. 2018. ‘Women in Early Pythagoreanism’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Penella, R. J. 1990. Greek Philosophers and Sophists in the Fourth Century A.D. Studies in Eunapius of Sardis. Cairns: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Perioli, E. 1997. ‘Gregory of Nyssa and the Neoplatonic Doctrine of the Soul’, Vigiliae Christianae 51(2): 117–39.Google Scholar
Petkas, A. 2020. ‘Hypatia and the Desert. A Late Antique Defense of Classicism’, in Norman, D. L. and Petkas, A.. (eds.), Hypatia of Alexandria. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 7–29.Google Scholar
Piccione, R. M. 1999. ‘Caratterizzazione di lemmi nell’Anthologion di Giovanni Stobeo. Questioni di metodo’, Rivista di Filologia e Istruzione Classica 127: 139–75.Google Scholar
Pines, S. 1975. ‘Aristotle’s Politics in Arabic Philosophy’, Israel Oriental Studies 5: 150–60.Google Scholar
Plant, I. M. 2004. Women Writers in Ancient Greece and Rome: An Anthology. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Plass, P. 1978. ‘Plato’s Pregnant Lover’, Symbolae Osloenses 53, 47–55.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1973. Theaetetus, tr. J. MacDowell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. 1974. ‘Feminism in Book V of Plato’s Republic’, Apeiron 8: 33–35.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. 1975. Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. 1978. ‘Plato and the Female Physician (Republic 454d2)’, American Journal of Philology 99(4): 496–500.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. 2013. Pythagorean Women: Their History and Writings. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Press, G. A. (ed.). 2000. Who Speaks for Plato? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Protasi, S. 2020. ‘Teaching Ancient Women Philosophers: A Case Study’, Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 6(3): 1–26.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. 2009. Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts, tr. D. Konstan. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Ram-Prasad, C. 2018. Human Being, Bodily Being: Phenomenology from Classical India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reeser, T. W. 2016. Setting Plato Straight: Translating Ancient Sexuality in the Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1998. Aristotle: Politics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Reisman, D. C. 2004. ‘Plato’s Republic in Arabic: A Newly Discovered Passage’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14: 263–300.Google Scholar
Rettig, G. F. 1876. Platons Symposion. Halle: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2005. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (ed.). 2011. Thinking through Excerpts. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Riddle, J. M. 1992. Contraception and Abortion from the Ancient World to the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Riginos, A. S. 1976. Platonica. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1965. ‘Hypatia’, Phoenix 19(3): 214–25.Google Scholar
Roded, R. 1999. Women in Islam and the Middle East: A Reader. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Romano, F. 2006. Giamblico. Summa Pitagorica. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Rosán, L. J. 1949. The Philosophy of Proclus. The Final Phase of Ancient Thought. New York: Cosmos.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, E. I. J. (ed. and tr.). 1969. Averroes’ Commentary on Plato’s Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roth, C. P. 1992. ‘Platonic and Pauline Elements in the Ascent of the Soul in Gregory of Nyssa’s Dialogue On the Soul and Resurrection’, Vigiliae Christianae 46: 20–30.Google Scholar
Roth, C. P. 1993. On the Soul and Resurrection. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary.Google Scholar
Rousselle, A. 1988. Porneia: On Desire and the Body in Antiquity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1998. Plato: Symposium. Liverpool: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Rowett, C. 2014. ‘The Pythagorean Society and Politics’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–30.Google Scholar
Ruddick, S. 1980. ‘Maternal Thinking’, Feminist Studies 6: 342–67.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D., and Westerink, L. G. (ed. and tr.). 1981. Proclus. Théologie Platonicienne 4. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Salamon, G. 2009. ‘Justification and Queer Method, or Leaving Philosophy’, Hypatia, 24(1): 225–30.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, A. 1976. ‘The Philosopher and the Female in the Political Thought of Plato’, Political Theory 4: 195–212.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, A. 1984. ‘Eros and the Female in Greek Political Thought: An Interpretation of the Symposium’, Political Theory 12, 5–27.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, A. 1985. Women in the History of Political Thought: Ancient Greece to Machiavelli. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, A. 1992. Fear of Diversity: The Birth of Political Science in Ancient Greek Thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Sayeed, A. 2013. Women and the Transmission of Religious Knowledge in Islam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schott, R. M. 2006. ‘Feminism and the History of Philosophy’, in Alcoff, L. M. and Kittay, E. F. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 43–63.Google Scholar
Schultz, J. 2019a. ‘Conceptualizing the ‘Female’ Soul – a Study in Plato and Proclus’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27(5): 883–901.Google Scholar
Schultz, J. 2019b. ‘Mütterliche Ursachen in Proklos’ Metaphysik’, Philologus 163(2): 250–73.Google Scholar
Schultz, J. 2019c. ‘Die proklische Diotima. Philosophie, Religion und das Weibliche’, Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 22: 75–98.Google Scholar
Schultz, J. 2022. ‘Beyond the Binary Distinction? Athena and Other Virgin Goddesses in Proclus’ Metaphysics’, in Layne, D. A. and Elbert Decker, J. (eds.), Otherwise Than the Binary: New Feminist Readings of Ancient Philosophy and Culture. New York: SUNY Press, 263–95.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1997. ‘“Becoming Like God” in the Timaeus and Aristotle’, in Calvo, T. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, pp. 327–39.Google Scholar
Segonds, A. Ph. (ed. and tr.) 1985. Proclus. Sur le Premier Alcibiade de Platon 1–2. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Sheather, M. 1995. ‘The Eulogies on Macrina and Gorgonia: Or, What Difference Did Christianity Make?’, Pacifica Theological Studies 8: 22–39.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. 2017. ‘Eros and the Pursuit of Form’, in Destrée, P. and Gianopoulou, Z. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125–42.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. 2021. ‘Moral Motivation in Plato’s Republic? Philia and Return to the Cave’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 59: 79–105.Google Scholar
Shelton, J.-A. 1995. ‘Persuasion and Paradigm in Seneca’s Consolatio ad Marciam 1–6’, Classica et Mediaevalia 46: 157–88.Google Scholar
Silvas, A. M. 2008. Macrina the Younger: Philosopher of God. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Smith, J. W. 2000. ‘Macrina, Tamer of Horses and Healer of Souls: Grief and the Therapy of Hope in Gregory of Nyssa’s De Anima et Resurrectione’, Journal of Theological Studies 52(1): 37–60.Google Scholar
Smith, J. W. 2004. ‘A Just and Reasonable Grief: The Death and Function of a Holy Woman in Gregory of Nyssa’s Life of Macrina’, Journal of Early Christian Studies. 12(1): 57–84.Google Scholar
Smith, L. 2011. ‘The Kahun Gynaecological Papyrus: Ancient Egyptian Medicine’, BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health 37(1): 54–55.Google Scholar
Smith, N. D. 1983. ‘Plato and Aristotle on the Nature of Women’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 21: 467–78.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. 1989. The Woman and the Lyre: Women Writers in Classical Greece and Rome. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Sogno, Ch., and Watts, E. J. 2018. ‘Epistolography’, in McGill, S. and Watts, E. (eds.), A Companion to Late Antique Literature. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, pp. 389–400.Google Scholar
Spelman, E. 1982. ‘Woman as Body: Ancient and Contemporary Views’, Feminist Studies, 8(1): 109–31.Google Scholar
Steenkamp, V. 2003. ‘Traditional Herbal Remedies Used by South African Women for Gynaecological Complaints’, Ethnopharmocology 86(1): 97–108.Google Scholar
Sukthankar, V. S. et al. (eds.) 1933–66. The Mahābhārata for the First Time Critically Edited,19 vols. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.Google Scholar
Sullivan, B. 2016. ‘An Overview of Mahābhārata Scholarship: A Perspective on the State of the Field’, Religion Compass 10(7): 165–75.Google Scholar
Sutton, N. 1999. ‘An Exposition of Early Sāṃkhya, A Rejection of the Bhagavad Gītā and a Critique of the Role of Women in Hindu Society: The Sulabhā-Janaka-Saṃvāda’, Annal of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 80: 55–65.Google Scholar
Swancutt, D. 2006. ‘Still before Sexuality: “Greek” Androgyny, the Roman Imperial Politics of Masculinity and the Roman Invention of the Tribas’, in Penner, T. and Vander Stichele, C. (eds.), Mapping Gender in Ancient Religious Discourses. Leiden: Brill, pp. 11–61.Google Scholar
Syros, V. 2008. ‘A Note on the Transmission of Aristotle’s Political Ideas in Medieval Persia and Early-Modern India. Was There Any Arabic or Persian Translation of the Politics?’, Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale 50: 303–9.Google Scholar
Tanaseanu-Döbler, I. 2012. ‘Synesios und die Theurgie’, in Seng, H. and Hoffmann, L. M. (eds.), Synesios von Kyrene. Politik – Literatur – Philosophie. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 201–31.Google Scholar
Tanaseanu-Döbler, I. 2013. ‘Sosipatra – Role Models for Pagan Divine Women in Late Antiquity’, in Dzielska, M. and Twardowska, K.. (eds.), Divine Men and Women in the History and Society of Late Hellenism. Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press, pp. 123–49.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (tr.) 2006. Proclus. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Vol. 1: Proclus on the Socratic State and Atlantis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (tr.) 2017. Proclus. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus Vol. 6: Proclus on the Gods of Generation and the Creation of Humans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. C. 2004. ‘Improving on Nature’s Exemplar: Averroes’ Completion of Aristotle’s Psychology of Intellect’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 47: 107–30.Google Scholar
Temkin, O. 1956. Soranus: Gynaecology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. 1961. An Introduction to the Pythagorean Writings of the Hellenistic Period. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. 1965. The Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. 1971. ‘On the Problem of Doric Pseudo-Pythagorica. An Alternative Theory of Date and Purpose’, in von Friitz, K. (ed.), Pseudoepigraphia I. Pseudopythagorica. Lettres de Platon Litterature Pseudepigraphique Juive, vol. 18. Vandouvres: Foundation Hardt, pp. 59–102.Google Scholar
Thumiger, C. 2017. A History of the Mind and Mental Health in Classical Greek Medical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tong, R., and Botts, T. F. (eds.). 2017. Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction. 5th ed. New York: Westview.Google Scholar
Torre, C. 2000. Il matrimonio del Sapiens: Ricerche sul de Matrimonio di Seneca. Università di Genova, Facoltà di lettere, Dipartimento di archeologia, filologia classica e loro tradizioni.Google Scholar
Totelin, L. 2009. Hippocratic Recipes: Oral and Written Transmission of Pharmacological Knowledge in Fifth and Fourth Century Greece. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Totelin, L. 2016. ‘Technologies of Knowledge: Pharmacology, Botany, and Medical Recipes’, Oxford Handbook Online. doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935390.013.94.Google Scholar
Totelin, L. 2017. ‘The Third Way’, in Lemhaus, L. and Martelli, M. (eds.), Collecting Recipes: Byzantine and Jewish Pharmacology in Dialogue. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 103–22.Google Scholar
Totelin, L. 2018. ‘Therapeutics’, in Pormann, P. E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hippocrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 200–16.Google Scholar
Totelin, L. 2020. ‘Do No Harm: Phanostrate’s Midwifery Practice’, Technai: An International Journal for Ancient Science and Technology 11: 129–43.Google Scholar
Townshend, M. 2017. The Woman Question in Plato’s Republic. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Trott, A. M. 2019. Aristotle on the Matter of Form. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Tuana, N. (ed.). 1994. Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Tuana, N., and Cowling, W. 1994. ‘The Presence and Absence of the Feminine in Plato’s Philosophy’, in Tuana, N. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 243–70.Google Scholar
Ulacco, A. 2016. ‘The Appropriation of Aristotle in the Ps-Pythagorean Treatises’, in Falcon, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 202–17.Google Scholar
Ulacco, A. 2017. Pseudopythagorica Dorica. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Usener, H. 1963. Epicurea. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
van Buitenen, J. A. B. (tr.) 1975. The Mahābhārata: 2. The Book of the Assembly Hall; 3. The Book of the Forest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Van Geytenbeek, A. C. 1962. Musonius Rufus and Greek Diatribe, tr. B. L. Hijmans. Assen: Van Gorcum & Co.Google Scholar
Vanita, R. 2003. ‘The Self Is Not Gendered: Sulabhā’s Debate with King Janaka’, National Women’s Studies Association Journal 15(2): 76–93.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1989. ‘Was Plato a Feminist?’, Times Literary Supplement, March 17–23.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1994. ‘Was Plato a Feminist?’, in Tuana, N. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
von Oehler, F. 1858. Gregor von Nyssa. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Waithe, M. E. 1987a. ‘Diotima of Mantinea’, in Waithe, M. E. (ed.), A History of Women Philosophers, vol. I, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 83–117.Google Scholar
Waithe, M. E. (ed.), 1987b. A History of Women Philosophers Volume 1: 600 BC–500 AD. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Waithe, M. E. 2015. ‘From Canon Fodder to Canon-Formation: How Do We Get There from Here?’ The Monist 98: 21–33.Google Scholar
Wang, R. R. (ed.) 2003. Images of Women in Chinese Thought and Culture. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. X. et al. 2020. ‘Menstrual Cycle Regularity and Length across the Reproductive Lifespan and Risk of Premature Mortality: Prospective Cohort Study’, British Medical Journal 371. 10.1136/bmj.m3464.Google Scholar
Ward, J. K. 1996. Feminism and Ancient Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. 2002. ‘The Unity of Opposites in Plato’s Symposium’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23, 1–61.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2009. ‘Diogenes Laërtius, Biographer of Philosophy’, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. J. G. (eds.), Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–49.Google Scholar
Warren, K. J. 2009. An Unconventional History of Western Philosophy: Conversations Between Men and Women Philosophers. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Watts, E. J. 2017. Hypatia. The Life and Legend of an Ancient Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wawrytko, S. A. 2019. ‘Women on Love: Idealisation in the Philosophies of Diotima and Murasaki Shikibu’, Philosophy East and West 68(4): 1314–44.Google Scholar
Wender, D. 1973. ‘Plato: Misogynist, Paedophile, Feminist’, Arethusa, 6(1): 75–90.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1971. Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (ed. and tr.). 1959. Damascius. Lectures on the Philebus, Wrongly Attributed to Olympiodorus. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (ed. and tr.). 1977. The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo. Vol. II Damascius. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G., and Combès, J. (ed. and tr.). 1986–91. Damascius. Traité des premiers principes 1–3. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G., and Combès, J. (ed. and tr.). 2002–3. Damascius. Commentaire du Parménide de Platon 1–4. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
White, D. G. 2009. Sinister Yogis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (ed.). 2021. Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T., and Thompson, S. 2013. The Romance between Greece and the East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wider, K. 1986. ‘Women Philosophers in the Ancient Greek World: Donning the Mantle’, Hypatia 1: 21–62.Google Scholar
Wilcox, A. 2006. ‘Exemplary Grief: Gender and Virtue in Seneca’s Consolations to Women’, Helios 33: 73–100.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1993. ‘Macrina’s Deathbed Revisited: Gregory of Nyssa on Mind and Passion’, in Wickham, L. R. and Bammel, C. P. (eds.), Christian Faith and Greek Philosophy in Late Antiquity: Essays in Tribute to George Christopher Stead. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. 1990. ‘Laying down the Law: The Oversight of Men’s Sexual Behaviour in Classical Athens’, in Winkler, J. J (ed.). The Constraints of Desire: the Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece, 45–70. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, C. M. 1986. George Gemistos Plethon: The Last of the Hellenes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wolfskeel, C. 1987. ‘Makrina’, in Waithe, M. E. (ed.), A History of Women Philosophers: Ancient Women Philosophers 600 B.C.–500 A.D. New York: Springer, pp. 139–68.Google Scholar
Wray, D. 2009. ‘Seneca and Tragedy’s Reason’, in Bartsch, S. and Wray, D. (eds.), Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 237–54.Google Scholar
Wright, W. C. (ed. and tr.). 1922. Philostratus and Eunapius. The Lives of the Sophists. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Xiao, T. 蕭統 (ed.). 2021. Wenxuan 文選 (aka Zhaoming wenxuan 昭明文選), 60 vols. https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&res=91990.Google Scholar
Zaslavsky, C. 1992. ‘Women as the First Mathematicians’, ISGE Newsletter: International Study Group on Ethnomathematics 7(1). https://web.nmsu.edu/~pscott/isgem71.htm.Google Scholar
Zhmud, L. 2019. ‘What Is Pythagorean in the Pseudo-Pythagorean Literature?’, Philologus 163: 72–94.Google Scholar
Zhu, X. 1270. Zhuzi yulei 朱子語類 (Classified Conversations of Zhu Xi), ed. Jingde, Li 黎靖德, 140 vols. https://ctext.org/zhuzi-yulei/zh.Google Scholar
Zintzen, C. 1972. ‘Alte Virtus Animosa Cadit: Gedanken zur Darstellung des Tragischen in Senecas Hercules Furens’, in Lefèvre, E. (ed.), Senecas Tragödien. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 149–209.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Katharine R. O'Reilly, Toronto Metropolitan University, Caterina Pellò, Université de Genève
  • Book: Ancient Women Philosophers
  • Online publication: 17 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009028769.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Katharine R. O'Reilly, Toronto Metropolitan University, Caterina Pellò, Université de Genève
  • Book: Ancient Women Philosophers
  • Online publication: 17 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009028769.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Katharine R. O'Reilly, Toronto Metropolitan University, Caterina Pellò, Université de Genève
  • Book: Ancient Women Philosophers
  • Online publication: 17 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009028769.014
Available formats
×