Book contents
- The Ancient Aesthetics of Deception
- The Ancient Aesthetics of Deception
- Copyright page
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Gorgias and the Justice of Tragic Apatē
- Chapter 2 The Circulation and Significance of Apatē in the Classical Era
- Chapter 3 The Dramatic Entanglement of Aesthetic Illusion with Deceit in Sophocles’ Electra
- Chapter 4 Immersion and Corruption in Plato’s Republic
- Chapter 5 The Void of Hellenistic Criticism
- Chapter 6 The Appeal and Challenge of Apatē in Imperial Criticism: Plutarch’s De audiendis poetis
- Chapter 7 Lucian and the Spell of Philosophy
- Chapter 8 How to Read Ekphrasis: The Tabula Cebetis
- Chapter 9 Christian Polemics against Idolatry: Clement of Alexandria’s Protrepticus
- Chapter 10 The Aesthetics of Deception Reconfigured in Heliodorus’ Ethiopica
- Chapter 11 From Deepfake to Psychotherapy: The Aesthetics of Deception Today
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 August 2021
Book contents
- The Ancient Aesthetics of Deception
- The Ancient Aesthetics of Deception
- Copyright page
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Gorgias and the Justice of Tragic Apatē
- Chapter 2 The Circulation and Significance of Apatē in the Classical Era
- Chapter 3 The Dramatic Entanglement of Aesthetic Illusion with Deceit in Sophocles’ Electra
- Chapter 4 Immersion and Corruption in Plato’s Republic
- Chapter 5 The Void of Hellenistic Criticism
- Chapter 6 The Appeal and Challenge of Apatē in Imperial Criticism: Plutarch’s De audiendis poetis
- Chapter 7 Lucian and the Spell of Philosophy
- Chapter 8 How to Read Ekphrasis: The Tabula Cebetis
- Chapter 9 Christian Polemics against Idolatry: Clement of Alexandria’s Protrepticus
- Chapter 10 The Aesthetics of Deception Reconfigured in Heliodorus’ Ethiopica
- Chapter 11 From Deepfake to Psychotherapy: The Aesthetics of Deception Today
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Ancient Aesthetics of DeceptionThe Ethics of Enchantment from Gorgias to Heliodorus, pp. 283 - 307Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. A. (2012) Callimachus in Context. From Plato to the Augustan Poets. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Agapitos, P. (1998) ‘Narrative, rhetoric and “drama” rediscovered. Scholars and poets in Byzantium interpret Heliodorus’, in Studies in Heliodorus, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 125–56.Google Scholar
Albrecht, C. (2007) ‘Wörter lügen manchmal, Bilder immer. Wissenschaft nach der Wende zum Bild’, in Mit Bildern lügen, eds. Liebert, W.-A. and Metten, T.. Cologne: 29–49.Google Scholar
Allan, R. J. (2011) ‘The historical present in Thucydides. Capturing the case of αἱρεῖ and λαμβάνει’, in The Historical Present in Thucydides. Semantics and Narrative Function, ed. Lallot, J.. Leiden: 37–63.Google Scholar
Allan, R. J., de Jong, I. J. F. and de Jonge, C. C. (2017) ‘From enargeia to immersion. The ancient roots of a modern concept’, Style 51/1: 34–51.Google Scholar
Anderson, M., Cairns, D. and Sprevak, M. (eds.) (2019) Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Anhalt, E. K. (2008) ‘Seeing is believing. Four women on display in Herodotus’ Histories’, New England Classical Journal 35/4: 269–80.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1992) ʻAn Epicurean survey of poetic theories (Philodemus On Poems 5, cols. 26–36)ʼ, CQ 42/2: 395–415.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. (1988) Denys d’Halicarnasse. Opuscules rhétoriques. Les orateurs antiques. Tome ii: Démosthène. Paris.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (1997) ‘Verbal aspect and mimetic description in Thucydides’, in Grammar as Interpretation. Greek Literature in Its Linguistic Contexts, ed. Bakker, E. J.. Leiden: 7–54.Google Scholar
Banfield, A. (1982) Unspeakable Sentences. Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston.Google Scholar
Barbantani, S. (2001) Φάτις νικηφόρος. Frammenti di elegia encomiastica nell’età delle Guerre Galatiche. Supplementum Hellenisticum 958 e 989. Milan.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. (2002) Staged Narrative. Poetics and the Messenger in Greek Tragedy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. (2014) ‘The concept of mimesis in the Hippocratic De victu’, CQ 64/2: 542–57.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1989) Decoding the Ancient Novel. The Reader and the Role of Description in Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius. Princeton.Google Scholar
Batchelder, A. G. (1995) The Seal of Orestes. Self-Reference and Authority in Sophocles’ Electra. Lanham.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M. and von Möllendorff, P. (2017) Ein literarischer Prometheus. Lukian aus Samosata und die Zweite Sophistik. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Becker, A. and Scholz, P. (eds.) (2004) Dissoi Logoi. Zweierlei Ansichten. Ein sophistischer Traktat. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bell, J. M. (1978) ‘Κίμβιξ ϰαὶ σοφός. Simonides in the anecdotal tradition’, QUCC 28: 29–86.Google Scholar
Berdozzo, F. (2011) Götter, Mythen, Philosophen. Lukian und die paganen Göttervorstellungen seiner Zeit. Berlin.Google Scholar
Berthelot, K. (2011) ʻPhilon d’Alexandrie, lecteur d’Homère. Quelques éléments de réflexion’, in Prolongements et renouvellements de la tradition classique, eds. Balansard, A., Dorival, G. and Loubet, M.. Aix-en-Provence: 145–58.Google Scholar
Bierl, A. (1990) ‘Dionysus, wine and tragic poetry. A metatheatrical reading of P. Köln vi 242A = TrGF ii F646a’, GRBS 31/4: 353–91.Google Scholar
Billings, J. (2018) ‘Orestes’ urn in word and action’, in The Materialities in Greek Tragedy, eds. Mueller, M. and Telò, M.. London: 49–62.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2009) The Scroll and the Marble. Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Bleicher, J. K. and Pörksen, B. (eds.) (2004) Grenzgänger. Formen des New Journalism. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (2001) ‘Wirklichkeitsbegriff und Möglichkeit des Romans’, in Hans Blumenberg. Ästhetische und metaphorologische Schriften, ed. Haverkamp, A.. Frankfurt: 47–73.Google Scholar
Blundell, M. W. (1989) Helping Friends and Harming Enemies. A Study in Sophocles and Greek Ethics. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, G. (1994) ‘Die Wiederkehr der Bilder’, in Was ist ein Bild? ed. Boehm, G.. Munich: 11–38.Google Scholar
Bolens, G. (2012) The Style of Gestures. Embodiment and Cognition in Literary Narrative. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Bonnechere, P. (2009) ‘Notes trophoniaques iii. Héliodore, Éthiopiques, i.28.1–29.4; ii.11.5: La caverne des brigands égyptiens et Trophonios’, AC 78/1: 197–214.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (1993) ‘Lies, fiction and slander in early Greek poetry’, in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, eds. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Exeter: 1–37.Google Scholar
Brandão, J. L. (2001) A poética do hipocentauro. Literatura, sociedade e discurso ficcional em Luciano de Samósata. Belo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Branham, R. B. (1989) Unruly Eloquence. Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar
Bréchet, C. (1999) ‘Le De audiendis poetis de Plutarque et le procès platonicien de la poésie’, RPh 73/2: 209–44.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, H. (2003) ‘A neglected tradition? Art history as Bildwissenschaft’, Critical Inquiry 29/3: 418–28.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, H. (2004) ‘Drehmomente, Merkmale und Ansprüche des iconic turn’, in Iconic Turn. Die neue Macht der Bilder, ed. Maar, C.. Cologne: 15–27.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1992) Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity. Towards a Christian Empire. Madison.Google Scholar
Buchheim, T. (1985) ‘Maler, Sprachbildner. Zur Verwandtschaft des Gorgias mit Empedokles’, Hermes 113/4: 417–29.Google Scholar
Buchheim, T. (ed.) (1989) Gorgias von Leontinoi. Reden, Fragmente und Testimonien (Griechisch–Deutsch). Hamburg.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. and van Emde Boas, E. (2019) ‘Attending to tragic messenger speeches’, in Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece. Under the Spell of Stories, ed. Grethlein, J., Huitink, L. and Tagliabue, A.. Oxford: 59–80.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1999) ‘Culture and society in Plato’s Republic’, in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 20, ed. Peterson, G. B.. Salt Lake City: 215–324.Google Scholar
Bussels, S. (2012) The Animated Image. Roman Theory on Naturalism, Vividness and Divine Power. Berlin.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. W. (ed.) (1919) Clement of Alexandria. The Exhortation to the Greeks. The Rich Man’s Salvation. To the Newly Baptized. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar
Büttner, S. (2000) Die Literaturtheorie bei Platon und ihre anthropologische Begründung. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. (2013) ‘A short history of shudders’, in Unveiling Emotions ii. Emotions in Greece and Rome. Texts, Images, Material Culture, eds. Chaniotis, A. and Ducrey, P.. Stuttgart: 85–108.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. (2017) ‘Horror, pity, and the visual in ancient Greek aesthetics’, in Emotions in the Classical World. Methods, Approaches, and Directions, eds. Cairns, D. and Nelis, D.. Stuttgart: 53–78.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1991) ʻQuand dire c’est faire voir. L’évidence dans la rhétorique antiqueʼ, EL 49/4: 3–22.Google Scholar
Calogero, G. (1957) ‘Gorgias and the Socratic principle Nemo sua sponte peccat’, JHS 77: 12–17.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. (1998) ‘Lucian on conversion. Remarks on Lucian’s dialogue Nigrinos’, in Ancient and Modern Perspectives on the Bible and Culture. Essays in Honor of Hans Dieter Betz, ed. Collins, A. Y.. Atlanta: 26–48.Google Scholar
Capuccino, C. (2005) Filosofi e rapsodi. Testo, traduzione e commento dello Ione platonico. Bologna.Google Scholar
Caracciolo, M. (2014) The Experientiality of Narrative. An Enactivist Approach. Berlin.Google Scholar
Carson, A. (1992) ‘Simonides painter’, in Innovations of Antiquity, ed. Hexter, R.. New York: 51–68.Google Scholar
Caster, M. (1935) ‘La composition du Nigrinos et les intentions ironiques attribuées à Lucien’, in Mélanges offerts à M. Octave Navarre. Toulouse: 471–85.Google Scholar
Cataudella, Q. (1931) ‘Sopra alcuni concetti della poetica antica. “Philanthropia”’, RFIC 59: 382–7.Google Scholar
Chandler, C. (2006) Philodemus On Rhetoric. Books 1 and 2. Translation and Exegetical Essays. New York.Google Scholar
Chaston, C. (2010) Tragic Props and Cognitive Function. Aspects of the Function of Images in Thinking. Leiden.Google Scholar
Chrysanthou, C. (2018) Plutarch’s Parallel Lives. Narrative Technique and Moral Judgement. Berlin/Boston.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1992) ‘Lucian of Samosata. Four philosophical lives (Nigrinus, Demonax, Peregrinus, Alexander Pseudomantis)’, in ANRW ii 36.5, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin: 3406–50.Google Scholar
Conley, T. M. (1985) ‘Dating the so-called Dissoi Logoi. A cautionary note’, AncPhil 5/1: 59–65.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2001) ‘Reclaiming the theatrical in the Second Sophistic’, Helios 28/1: 75–96.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1996) The Hidden Author. An Interpretation of Petronius’ Satyricon. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Coxon, A. H. (ed.) (1986) The Fragments of Parmenides. A Critical Text with Introduction, Translation, the Ancient Testimonia and a Commentary. Assen.Google Scholar
Cullhed, A. (2015) The Shadow of Creusa. Negotiating Fictionality in Late Antique Latin Literature. Berlin/Boston.Google Scholar
Dachs, H. (1913) Die λύσις ἐκ τοῦ προσώπου. Ein exegetischer und kritischer Grundsatz Aristarchs und seine Neuanwendung auf Ilias und Odyssee. Erlangen.Google Scholar
Dalfen, J. (1974) Polis und Poiesis. Die Auseinandersetzung mit der Dichtung bei Platon und seinen Zeitgenossen. Munich.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1997) After the End of Art. Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2008) Between Grammar and Rhetoric. Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. (1989) ‘Teoria e prassi storiografica di Plutarco. Una proposta di lettura della coppia Emilio Paolo-Timoleonte’, Maia 41: 199–215.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2007) Ancient Greek Scholarship. A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises, from Their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1977) The Middle Platonists. A Study of Platonism, 80 bc to ad 220. London.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1993) Der Platonismus in der Antike, Vol. iii. Der Platonismus im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert nach Christus. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. (2007) ‘Novel ways of being philosophical, or: A tale of two dogs and a phoenix’, in Philosophical Presences in the Ancient Novel, eds. Morgan, J. R. and Jones, M.. Groningen: 137–49.Google Scholar
Eberwein, T. (2013) Literarischer Journalismus. Theorie – Traditionen – Gegenwart. Köln.Google Scholar
Ebner, M. (2001) ‘Einleitung’, in Lukian. Φιλοψευδεῖς ἢ Ἀπιστῶν. Die Lügenfreunde oder: Der Ungläubige, eds. Ebner, M., Gzella, H., Nesselrath, H.-G. and Ribbat, E.. Darmstadt: 35–61.Google Scholar
Elffers, J., Schuyt, M. and Leemann, F. (1981) Anamorphosen. Ein Spiel mit der Wahrnehmung, dem Schein und der Wirklichkeit. Cologne.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (1993) ‘Seductions of art. Encolpius and Eumolpus in a Neronian picture gallery’, PCPhS 39: 30–47.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (1995) Art and the Roman Viewer. The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Esposito, G. (1995) ‘Il contenuto e le fonti scettiche dell’Ermotimo di Luciano’, RAAN 65: 163–84.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. L. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (1996) ‘Blending as a central process of grammar’, in Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, ed. Goldberg, A.. Stanford: 183–203.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1993) ‘Towards an account of the ancient world’s concept of fictive belief’, in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, eds. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Exeter: 230–44.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1989) ‘Plato and poetry’, in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Vol. i, ed. Kennedy, G. A.. Cambridge: 92–148.Google Scholar
Ferrari, P. F. and Rizzolatti, G. (2014) ‘Introduction. Mirror neuron research. The past and the future’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369/1644: 1–4.Google Scholar
Flashar, H. (1956) ‘Die medizinischen Grundlagen der Lehre von der Wirkung der Dichtung in der griechischen Poetik’, Hermes 84/1: 12–48.Google Scholar
Ford, A. L. (2002) The Origins of Criticism. Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar
Forster, F. (2018). Die Polis im Wandel. Ehrendekrete für eigene Bürger im Kontext der hellenistischen Polisgesellschaft. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Freedberg, D. (1989) The Power of Images. Studies in the History and Theory of Response. Chicago.Google Scholar
Freeman, D., Reeve, S. et al (2017) ‘Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders’, Psychological Medicine 47: 2393–400.Google Scholar
Friis Johansen, H. (1964) ‘Die Elektra des Sophokles – Versuch einer neuen Deutung’ C&M 25: 8–32.Google Scholar
Fuchs, E. (1993) Pseudologia. Formen und Funktionen fiktionaler Trugrede in der griechischen Literatur der Antike. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Fuentes González, P. P. (2005) ‘Nigrinus’, in Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Vol. iv, ed. Goulet, R.. Paris: 712–17.Google Scholar
Gaiser, K. (2004) ‘Das Höhlengleichnis (1985)’, in Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Szlezák, T. A.. St. Augustin: 401–10.Google Scholar
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L. et al. (1996) ‘Action recognition in the premotor cortex’, Brain 119/2: 593–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gärtner, H. (1971) ‘Johannes Eugenikos, Protheoria zu Heliodors Aithiopika’, ByzZ 64/2: 322–5.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. (1987) ‘Gorgia e l’ἀπάτη della tragedia’, in Filologia e forme letterarie. Studi offerti a Francesco della Corte, Vol. i, ed. Boldrini, S.. Urbino: 245–60.Google Scholar
Gazzola, V. and Keysers, C. (2009) ‘The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects. Single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data’, Cerebral Cortex 19/6: 1239–55.Google Scholar
Geffcken, J. (1916–19) ‘Der Bilderstreit des heidnischen Altertums’, Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 19: 286–315.Google Scholar
Gemeinhardt, P. (2007) Das lateinische Christentum und die antike pagane Bildung. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Georgiadou, A. and Larmour, D. H. J. (1998) Lucian’s Science Fiction Novel True Histories. Interpretation and Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gianvittorio, L. (2015) ‘One deception, many lies: Frr. 301/302 Radt and Aeschylus’ Philoctetes’, WS 128: 19–26.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1993) ‘Plato on falsehood, not fiction’, in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, eds. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Exeter: 38–87.Google Scholar
Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.) (1993) Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter.Google Scholar
Gish, D. A. (2006) ‘Rivals in persuasion. Gorgianic sophistic versus Socratic rhetoric’, Polis 23: 46–73.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1990) ‘The Great Dionysia and civic ideology’, in Nothing to Do with Dionysus? eds. Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F.. Princeton: 97–129.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1994) ʻThe naive and knowing eye. Ecphrasis and the culture of viewing in the Hellenistic worldʼ, in Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture, eds. Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 197–223.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1995) Foucault’s Virginity. Ancient Erotic Fiction and the History of Sexuality. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1997) ‘The audience of Athenian tragedy’, in The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy, ed. Easterling, P. E.. Cambridge: 54–68.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (ed.) (2001) Being Greek under Rome. Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. L. (1979) ‘The real and the imaginary. Production and religion in the Graeco-Roman world’, Art History 2: 5–34.Google Scholar
Goward, B. (1999) Telling Tragedy. Narrative Technique in Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides. London.Google Scholar
Grady, J. E., Oakley, T. and Coulson, S. (1999) ‘Blending and metaphor’, in Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, eds. Steen, G. and Gibbs, R.. Philadelphia: 101–24.Google Scholar
Gray, B. (forthcoming) ‘Civic and counter-civic cosmopolitanism. Diodorus, Strabo and the later Hellenistic polis’, in Late Hellenistic Literature in Dialogue, eds. König, J. and Wiater, N.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2003) Asyl und Athen. Die Konstruktion kollektiver Identität in der griechischen Tragödie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2013) Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography. Futures Past from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2015) ‘Vision and reflexivity in the Odyssey and early vase-painting’, Word & Image 31/3: 197–212.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2016) ‘Lucian’s response to Augustine. Conversion and narrative in Confessions and Nigrinus’, Religion in the Roman Empire 2/2: 256–78.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2017) Aesthetic Experiences and Classical Antiquity. The Significance of Form in Narratives and Pictures. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2019a) ‘Das Postfaktische. Sophistische Betrachtungen zum postmodernen Erbe’, Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte 13/2: 113–22.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2019b) ‘World and words. The limits to mimesis and immersion in Heliodorus’ Ethiopica’, in Experience, Narrative and Criticism in Ancient Greece. Under the Spell of Stories, eds. Grethlein, J., Huitink, L. and Tagliabue, A.. Oxford: 127–47.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2020) ‘Plato in therapy. A cognitivist reassessment of the Republic’s idea of mimesis’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78/2: 157–70.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2021) ‘Author and characters. Ancient, narratological, and cognitive views on a tricky relationship’, CPh 116/2: 208–30.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (forthcoming) ‘Thisbe’s intrigue. A plot between deception and illusion (Heliod. 1.15–17)’, in Reading Heliodorus. The Jewel in the Ring, eds. Repath, I. and Whitmarsh, T.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. and Huitink, L. (2017) ‘Homer’s vividness. An enactive approach’, JHS 137: 67–91.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J., Huitink, L. and Tagliabue, A. (eds.) (2019) Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece. Under the Spell of Stories. Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (1990) ‘Contest and contradiction in early Greek poetry’, in Cabinet of the Muses. Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer, eds. Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J.. Atlanta: 185–207.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (2010) ʻLiterary criticismʼ, in A Companion to Hellenistic Literature, eds. Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M.. Malden, ma: 337–65.Google Scholar
Hamburger, K. (1993 [1957]) The Logic of Literature, tr. Rose, M. J., 2nd ed. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2002) The Aesthetics of Mimesis. Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2009) ‘The theory and practice of narrative in Plato’, in Narratology and Interpretation. The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature, eds. Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A.. Berlin/New York: 15–42.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2011) Between Ecstasy and Truth. Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2015) ‘Fiction’, in A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics, eds. Destrée, P. and Murray, P.. Chichester: 341–53.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1998) ‘A reading of Heliodorus, Aithiopika 3.4.1–3.5.2’, in Studies in Heliodorus, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 19–39.Google Scholar
Heirman, L. J. R. (ed.) (1972) Plutarchus, De audiendis poetis. Introduction, Translation, Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar
Hercher, R. (1869) ‘Τῆς Χαρικλείας ἑρμήνευμα τῆς σώφρονος ἐκ φωνῆς Φιλίππου τοῦ φιλοσόφου’, Hermes 3: 382–8.Google Scholar
Herrmann, F.-G. (2011) ‘Poetry in Plato’s Gorgias’, in Plato and the Poets, eds. Destrée, P. and Herrmann, F.-G.. Leiden: 21–40.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. (2009) ‘Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21/7: 1229–43.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Luipold, R. (2002) Plutarchs Denken in Bildern. Studien zur literarischen, philosophischen und religiösen Funktion des Bildhaften. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Luipold, R. (2005) ‘Einleitung’, in Die Bildtafel des Kebes. Allegorie des Lebens, eds. Hirsch-Luipold, R., Feldmeier, R., Hirsch, B., Koch, L. and Nesselrath, H.-G.. Darmstadt: 11–37.Google Scholar
Hogan, P. C. (2011) Affective Narratology. The Emotional Structure of Stories. Lincoln.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. A. (2010) The Symptom and the Subject. The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar
Hölscher, F. (2017) Die Macht der Gottheit im Bild. Archäologische Studien zur griechischen Götterstatue. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (2018) Visual Power in Ancient Greece and Rome. Between Art and Social Reality. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hölscher, U. (1952) ‘Der Logos bei Heraklit’, in Varia Variorum. Festgabe für Karl Reinhardt, dargebracht von Freunden und Schülern zum 14. Februar 1951. Münster: 69–81.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. and Pelling, C. (eds.) (2017) Herodotus. Histories. Book vi. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hose, M. (2014) ‘Klemens von Alexandrien und die Grenze zwischen Christen und Heidentum’, in Grenzen der Antike. Die Produktivität von Grenzen in Transformationsprozessen, ed. Heinze, A.. Berlin: 39–54.Google Scholar
Huitink, L. (2019) ‘Enargeia, enactivism and the ancient readerly imagination’, in Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity, eds. Anderson, M., Cairns, D. and Sprevak, M.. Edinburgh: 173–93.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2005) ‘“Philip the Philosopher” on the Aithiopika of Heliodorus’, in Metaphor and the Ancient Novel, eds. Harrison, S., Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S.. Groningen: 123–38.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2008) On Coming After. Studies in Post-Classical Greek Literature and Its Reception. i–ii. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2009) Critical Moments in Classical Literature. Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and Its Uses. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2012) Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature. The Silent Stream. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. and de Jonge, C. C. (eds.) (2018) Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome. Rhetoric, Criticism and Historiography. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. and Russell, D. (eds.) (2011) Plutarch, How to Study Poetry (De audiendis poetis). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P. et al. (1999) ‘Cortical mechanisms of human imitation’, Science 286/5449: 2526–8.Google Scholar
Immisch, O. (ed.) (1927) Gorgiae Helena. Kleine Texte für Vorlesungen und Übungen, Vol. clviii. Berlin.Google Scholar
Iribarren, L. (2013) ‘Les peintres d’Empédocle (DK 31 B23). Enjeux et portée d’une analogie préplatonicienne’, Philosophie Antique 13: 83–115.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1972) Der implizite Leser. Kommunikationsformen des Romans von Bunyan bis Beckett. Munich.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1984) Aristotle on Comedy. Towards a Reconstruction of Poetics ii. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Jaubert, A., Geiger, W. and Hissen, S. (1989) Fotos, die lügen. Politik mit gefälschten Bildern. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. M. (2005) Face to Face. Portraits of the Divine in Early Christianity. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Joly, R. and Byl, S. (eds.) (1984) Hippocrates. Du régime (Hippocratis De diaeta). Corpus Medicorum Graecorum 1.2.4. Berlin.Google Scholar
Jones, M. (2004) ‘The wisdom of Egypt. Base and heavenly magic in Heliodoros’ Aithiopika’, Ancient Narrative 4: 79–98.Google Scholar
Jones, M. (2012) Playing the Man. Performing Masculinities in the Ancient Greek Novel. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. (2008) ‘Plato on education and art’, in The Oxford Handbook of Plato, ed. Fine, G.. Oxford: 336–59.Google Scholar
Kasprzyk, D. (2017) ‘Les Aigyptiaka de Cnémon (Héliodore, Éthiopiques)’, AN 14: 149–47.Google Scholar
Kassel, R. (1958) Untersuchungen zur griechischen und römischen Konsolationsliteratur. Munich.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (1988) Guardians of Language. The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kasulke, C. T. (2005) Fronto, Marc Aurel und kein Konflikt zwischen Rhetorik und Philosophie im 2. Jh. n. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2010) Homer Between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2014) ʻArchaizing and classicism in the literary historical thinking of Dionysius of Halicarnassusʼ, in Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World, eds. Ker, J. and Pieper, C.. Leiden: 357–87.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2017) ʻLiterary history in imperial Greece. Dionysius’ On Ancient Orators, Plutarch’s On the Oracles of the Pythia, Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophistsʼ, in Griechische Literaturgeschichtsschreibung. Traditionen, Probleme und Konzepte, eds. Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A.. Berlin: 212–47.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2018) ‘The trouble with Calasiris. Duplicity and autobiographical narrative in Heliodorus and Galen’, Mnemosyne 72/2: 229–49.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (1950) ‘The Michigan Alcidamas-Papyrus; Heraclitus fr. 56d; The riddle of the lice’, CQ 44: 149–67.Google Scholar
Klauk, T. and Köppe, T. (eds.) (2014) Fiktionalität. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (= Revisionen, Vol. iv). Berlin.Google Scholar
Koch, L. (2005) ‘Der Weg zur Bildung. Die Tabula Cebetis aus pädagogischer Sicht’, in Die Bildtafel des Kebes. Allegorie des Lebens, eds. Hirsch-Luipold, R., Feldmeier, R. et al. Darmstadt: 194–221.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1998) ‘The invention of fiction’ in Ancient Fiction and Early Christian Narrative, eds. Hock, R. F. et al. Atlanta: 3–17.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2004) ‘“The birth of the reader”. Plutarch as a literary critic’, Scholia 13: 3–27.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2006) The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks. Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature. Toronto.Google Scholar
Korenjak, M. (2000) Publikum und Redner. Ihre Interaktion in der sophistischen Rhetorik der Kaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Kranz, W. (1933) Stasimon. Untersuchungen zu Form und Gehalt der griechischen Tragödie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1951) ‘The modern systems of the arts. A study in the history of aesthetics’, JHI 12/4: 496–527.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1952) ‘The modern systems of the arts. A study in the history of aesthetics (ii)’, JHI 13/1: 17-46.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, K. (2014) ‘Presence and prediction. The embodied reader’s cascades of cognition’, Style 48/3: 367–84.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, K. and Caracciolo, M. (2014) ‘Introduction. What is the “Second Generation”?’, Style 48/3: 261–74.Google Scholar
Kuzmičová, A. (2012) ‘Presence in the reading of literary narrative. A case for motor enactment’, Semiotica 189: 23–48.Google Scholar
Kuzmičová, A. (2013) ‘Outer vs inner reverberations. Verbal auditory imagery and meaning-making in literary narrative’, Journal of Literary Theory 7/1–2: 111–34.Google Scholar
Kyriakou, P. (1997) ʻAristotle’s Poetics and Stoic literary theoryʼ, RhM 140/3–4: 257-80.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (1993) ‘Empathic understanding. Emotion and cognition in classical dramatic audience-response’, PCPhS 39: 94–140.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (1997) ‘“Estrangement” or “reincarnation”? Performers and performance on the classical Athenian stage’, Arion 5/2: 66-107.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (1999) Initiating Dionysus. Ritual and Theatre in Aristophanes’ Frogs. Oxford.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2003) ‘Fiction as a discourse of philosophy in Lucian’s Verae historiae’, in The Ancient Novel and Beyond, eds. Panayotakis, S., Zimmerman, M. and Keulen, W.. Leiden: 115–27.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. (1986) Homer the Theologian. Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. (ed.) (1992) Homer’s Ancient Readers. The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes. Princeton.Google Scholar
Lattmann, C. (2010) Das Gleiche im Verschiedenen. Metapher des Sports und Lob des Siegers in Pindars Epinikien. Berlin.Google Scholar
Le Boulluec, A. (1998) ‘La place des concepts philosophiques dans la réflexion de Philon sur le plaisirʼ, in Philon d’Alexandrie et la langage de la philosophie, ed. Lévy, C.. Turnhout: 129–52.Google Scholar
Lechner, T. (2015) ‘Bittersüße Pfeile. Protreptische Rhetorik und platonische Philosophie in Lukians Nigrinus’, Millennium 12/1: 1–40.Google Scholar
Lechner, T. (2016) ‘Bittersüße Pfeile. Protreptische Rhetorik und platonische Philosophie in Lukians Nigrinus (2. Teil)’, Millennium 13/1: 67–140.Google Scholar
Ledbetter, G. M. (2003) Poetics before Plato. Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry. Princeton.Google Scholar
Lefteratou, A. (2018) Mythological Narratives. The Bold and Faithful Heroines of the Greek Novel. Berlin.Google Scholar
Leszl, W. (1985) ‘Il potere della parola in Gorgia e in Platone’, in Gorgia e la sofistica. Atti del convegno internazionale (Lentini-Catania 1983), eds. Montoneri, L. and Romano, F.. Catania: 65–80.Google Scholar
Levinson, J. (ed.) (1998) Aesthetics and Ethics. Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1993) ʻLe concept de doxa de Stoïciens à Philon d’Alexandrie. Essai d’étude diachroniqueʼ, in Passions and Perceptions. Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum, eds. Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. C.. Cambridge: 250–84.Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. (1992), ‘Graphein: écrire et dessiner’, in L’image en jeu. De l’antiquité à Paul Klee, eds. Bron, C. and Kassapoglou, E.. Yens-sur-Morges: 189–203.Google Scholar
Lowe, N. J. (2000) ‘Comic plots and the invention of fiction’, in The Rivals of Aristophanes. Studies in Athenian Old Comedy, eds. Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J.. London: 259–72.Google Scholar
Maar, C. and Burda, H. (eds.) (2006) Iconic Worlds. Neue Bilderwelten und Wissensräume. Cologne.Google Scholar
Macé, A. (2007) ‘Gorgias, le Gorgias et l’ordre de l’âme’, in Gorgias – Menon. Selected Papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum, ed. Erler, M. and Brisson, L.. Sankt Augustin: 83–9.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C. W. (1978) ‘Reason and necessity. Thucydides iii 9–14, 37–48’, JHS 98: 64–78.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1963) Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Manieri, A. (1998) L’immagine poetica nella teoria degli antichi. Phantasia ed enargeia. Pisa.Google Scholar
Männlein-Robert, I. (2007) Stimme, Schrift und Bild. Zum Verhältnis der Künste in der hellenistischen Dichtung. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Marchand, S. and Ponchon, P. (eds.) (2016) Platon, Gorgias, suivi de l’Éloge d’Hélène de Gorgias. Paris.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2013) ʻPolybius, Phylarchus, and “tragic history”. A reconsiderationʼ, in Polybius and His World. Essays in Memory of F. W. Walbank, eds. Gibson, B. and Harrison, T.. Oxford: 73–90.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2006) ‘How to write a messenger speech (Sophocles, Electra 680-763)’, in Greek Drama iii. Essays in honour of Kevin Lee, ed. Davidson, J.. London: 203–22.Google Scholar
Maso, S. (2018) Dissoi Logoi. Edizione criticamente rivista, introduzione, traduzione, commento. Rome.Google Scholar
Mastrangelo, M. and Harris, J. (1997) ‘The meaning of Republic 606a3–b5’, CQ 47/1: 301–5.Google Scholar
Méasson, A. (1980) ʻUn aspect de la critique du polythéisme chez Philon d᾽Alexandrie. Les acceptions du mot μῦθος dans son œuvreʼ, Mémoires (Centre Jean Palerne) 2: 75–107.Google Scholar
Méasson, A. (1986) Du char ailé de Zeus à l᾽arche d᾽alliance. Images et mythes Platoniciens chez Philon d᾽Alexandrie. Paris.Google Scholar
Mecella, L. (2014) ‘L’enigmatica figura di Eliodoro e la datazione delle Etiopiche’, Mediterraneo Antico 17/2: 633–58.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005) What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. (2019) Tausend Zeilen Lüge. Das System Relotius und der deutsche Journalismus. Berlin.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. (1982) ‘History, romance and realism in the Aithiopika of Heliodorus’, ClAnt 1: 221–65.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. (1989) ‘The story of Knemon in Heliodoros’ Aithiopika’, JHS 109: 99–113.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. (1991) ‘Reader and audiences in the Aithiopika of Heliodoros’, Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 4: 85–103.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. (1993) ‘Make-believe and make believe. The fictionality of the Greek novels’, in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, eds. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Exeter: 175–229.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. (2012a) ‘Heliodorus’ in Space in Ancient Greek Literature, ed. de Jong, I. J. F.. Leiden: 557–77.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. (2012b) ‘Le culte du Nil chez Héliodore’, in Les hommes et les dieux dans l’ancien roman, eds. Bost-Pouderon, C. and Pouderon, B.. Lyon: 255–67.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. and Repath, I. (2019) ‘Mistresses and servant-women, and the slavery and mastery of love in Heliodoros’, in Slaves and Masters in the Ancient Novel, eds. Panayotakis, S. and Paschalis, M.. Groningen: 139–60.Google Scholar
Morina, N., Brinkman, W.-P. et al. (2015) ‘Social interactions in virtual reality exposure therapy. A proof-of-concept pilot study’, Technology and Health Care 23/5: 581–9.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1985) The Measures of Praise. Structure and Function in Pindar’s Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Muecke, F. (1977) ‘Playing with the play. Theatrical self-consciousness in Aristophanes’, Antichthon 11: 52–67.Google Scholar
Munteanu, D. L. (2012) Tragic Pathos. Pity and Fear in Greek Philosophy and Tragedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Murray, J. S. (1988) ‘Disputation, deception, and dialectic. Plato on the true rhetoric (Phaedrus 261–266)’, Ph&Rh 21/4: 279–89.Google Scholar
Murray, P. (ed.) (1996) Plato on Poetry. Ion; Republic 376e–398b9; Republic 595–608b10. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Naddaff, R. A. (2002) Exiling the Poets. The Production of Censorship in Plato’s Republic. Chicago.Google Scholar
Nasrallah, L. S. (2010) Christian Responses to Roman Art and Architecture. The Second Century Church amid the Spaces of Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1999a) ‘Plato on imitation and poetry in Republic x’, in Virtues of Authenticity. Essays on Plato and Socrates, ed. Nehamas, A.. Princeton: 251–78.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1999b) ‘Plato and the mass media’, in Virtues of Authenticity. Essays on Plato and Socrates, ed. Nehamas, A.. Princeton: 279–99.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (2002) ‘Parmenidean being/Heraclitean fire’, in Presocratic Philosophy. Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, eds. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot: 45–64.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (1992) ‘Kaiserzeitlicher Skeptizismus in platonischem Gewand. Lukians Hermotimos’, in ANRW ii 36.5, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin: 3451–82.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (2001) ‘Lukian und die Magie’, in Lukian. Φιλοψευδεῖς ἢ Ἀπιστῶν. Die Lügenfreunde oder: Der Ungläubige, eds. Ebner, M., Gzella, H., Nesselrath, H.-G. and Ribbat, E.. Darmstadt: 153–66.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (2005) ‘Von Kebes zu Pseudo-Kebes’, in Die Bildtafel des Kebes. Allegorie des Lebens, eds. Hirsch-Luipold, R., Feldmeier, R., Hirsch, B., Koch, L. and Nesselrath, H.-G.. Darmstadt: 38–66.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (ed.) (2016) Gegen falsche Götter und falsche Bildung. Tatian, Rede an die Griechen. Eingeleitet, übersetzt und mit interpretierenden Essays versehen. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Nestle, W. (1941) Vom Mythos zum Logos. Die Selbstentfaltung des griechischen Denkens von Homer bis auf die Sophistik und Sokrates. Aalen.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. (2009) ‘Absorption and erudition in Philostratus’ Imagines’, in Philostratus, eds. Bowie, E. and Elsner, J.. Cambridge: 322–42.Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. (2005) ‘“Plato alone was not there …” Platonic presences in Lucian’, Hermathena 179: 89–103.Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. (2014) Reading Fiction with Lucian. Fakes, Freaks and Hyperreality. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Niehoff, M. R. (2011) Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Niehoff, M. R. (2012) ‘Philo and Plutarch on Homer’, in Homer and the Bible in the Eyes of Ancient Interpreters, ed. Niehoff, M. R.. Leiden: 127–54.Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. S., Phelan, J. and Walsh, R. (2015) ‘Ten theses about fictionality’, Narrative 23/1: 61–73.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1988) Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden, Vol. iii. Morgenröte; Idyllen aus Messina; Die fröhliche Wissenschaft, eds. Colli, G. and Montinari, M.. Munich.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2009) The Ancient Critic at Work. Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1993) ʻPoetry and the passions. Two Stoic viewsʼ, in Passions and Perceptions. Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum, eds. Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. C.. Cambridge: 97–149.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (1992) Alcidamas, Aristophanes and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (1998) Political Dissent in Democratic Athens. Intellectual Critics of Popular Rule. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. (2004) ‘Eucrates and Demainete. Lucian, Philopseudes 27–8’, CQ 54/2: 484–93.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. (2007a) ‘The love of wisdom and the love of lies. The philosophers and philosophical voices of Lucian’s Philopseudes’, in Philosophical Presences in the Ancient Novel, eds. Morgan, J. R. and Jones, M.. Groningen: 177–204.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. (2007b) In Search of the Sorcerer’s Apprentice. The Traditional Tales of Lucian’s Lover of Lies. Swansea.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (1994) ‘Framing the centaur. Reading fifth-century architectural sculpture’, in Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture, eds. Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 52–84.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (2017) ‘How the Gauls broke the frame. The political and theological impact of taking battle scenes off Greek temples’, in The Frame in Classical Art. A Cultural History, eds. Platt, V. and Squire, M.. Cambridge: 425–56.Google Scholar
Otto, N. (2009) Enargeia. Untersuchung zur Charakteristik alexandrinischer Dichtung. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pace, C. (2008) ‘Tragedia, ἔκπληξις e ἀπάτη nell’ anonima Vita di Eschilo’, SemRom 11: 229–54.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. (1995) Theatrum arbitri. Theatrical Elements in the Satyrica of Petronius. Leiden.Google Scholar
Papadimitropoulos, L. (2013) ‘Love and the reinstatement of the self in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica’, G&R 60: 101–13.Google Scholar
Parlavantza-Friedrich, U. (1969) Täuschungsszenen in den Tragödien des Sophokles. Berlin.Google Scholar
Paulsen, T. (1992) Inszenierung des Schicksals. Tragödie und Komödie im Roman des Heliodor. Trier.Google Scholar
Paulsen, T. (2009) ‘“Ambrosia floss aus seinen Reden”. Scherz, Satire, Ironie und tiefere Bedeutung in Lukians Nigrinos’, in Ironie. Griechische und lateinische Fallstudien, ed. Glei, R. F.. Trier: 229–45.Google Scholar
Pedrique, N. (2011) Logos dynastes. Dichtung und Rhetorik in Platons Gorgias. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Peponi, A.-E. (2012) Frontiers of Pleasure. Models of Aesthetic Response in Archaic and Classical Greek Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship. From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar
Platt, V. (2011) Facing the Gods. Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Platt, V. and Squire, M. (eds.) (2010) The Art of Art History in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Arethusa 43/2: 133–344. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Polletta, F. and Callahan, J. (2017) ‘Deep stories, nostalgia narratives, and fake news. Storytelling in the Trump era’, American Journal of Cultural Sociology 5/3: 392–408.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1995) ʻΟἱ κριτικοί. A reassessmentʼ, in Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle. A Collection of Papers in Honour of D. M. Schenkeveld, eds. Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R. and Sluiter, I.. Amsterdam: 83–109.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (ed.) (2006) Classical Pasts. The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2009a) ‘Is art modern? Kristeller’s “Modern system of the arts” reconsidered’, British Journal of Aesthetics 49/1: 1–24.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2010a) The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece. Matter, Sensation, and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Praechter, K. (1885) Cebetis tabulam quanam aetate conscripta esse videatur. Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Praechter, K. (1898) ‘Zur Frage nach Lukians philosophischen Quellen’, AGPh 11: 505–16.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. H. (1993) Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar. Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Puelma, M. (1989) ‘Der Dichter und die Wahrheit in der griechischen Poetik von Homer bis Aristoteles’, MH 46/2: 65–100.Google Scholar
Pujiula, M. (2006) Körper und christliche Lebensweise. Clemens von Alexandreia und sein Paidagogos. Berlin.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (1902) ‘Aus Lucians Lügenfreund’, in Festschrift Theodor Gomperz, dargebacht zum siebzigsten Geburtstage am 29. März 1902 von Schülern, Freunden, Collegen. Vienna: 197–207.Google Scholar
Radt, S. L. (1981) ‘Vita Aeschyli §6. ἕως τρίτου μέρους / ἕως τρίτης ἡμέρας’, ZPE 42: 1–7.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1971) Courants littéraires grecs des 2e et 3e siècles après J.-C. Paris.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1959) Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1980) ‘Literary criticism in the exegetical scholia to the Iliad. A sketch’, CQ 30/2: 265–87.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1985) ‘Pindar and later literary criticism in antiquity’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5: 383–401.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1994) ʻAristotle and Hellenistic scholarshipʼ, in La philologie grecque à l’époque hellénistique et romaine. Sept exposés suivis de discussions, ed. Montanari, F.. Geneva: 7–28.Google Scholar
Ringer, M. (1998) Electra and the Empty Urn. Metatheater and Role Playing in Sophocles. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Rispoli, G. M. (1984) ‘φαντασία ed ἐνάργεια negli scolî all’Iliade’, Vichiana 13: 311–39.Google Scholar
Rispoli, G. M. (1988) Lo spazio del verisimile. Il racconto, la storia e il mito. Naples.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. M. (ed.) (1979) Contrasting Arguments. An Edition of the Dissoi Logoi. Salem.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D. (1993) ‘Shouting “fire” in a crowded theater. Phrynichos’s Capture of Miletos and the politics of fear in early Greek tragedy’, Philologus 137: 159–96.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2017) ʻNutritious milk from Hagar’s school. Philo’s Reception of Homerʼ, StudPhilon 29: 1–32.Google Scholar
Rösler, W. (1980) ‘Die Entdeckung der Fiktionalität in der Antike’, Poetica 12/3–4: 283–319.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (1988) ‘Ἔμφασις in ancient literary criticism and Tractatus Coislinianus c. 7’, Maia 40: 125–9.Google Scholar
Ryan, M.-L. (2001) Narrative as Virtual Reality. Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Sandnes, K. O. (2009) The Challenge of Homer. School, Pagan Poets and Early Christianity. London.Google Scholar
Sandy, G. N. (2001) ‘A neoplatonic interpretation of Heliodorus’ Ethiopian Story’, in ΟΠΩΡΑ. La belle saison de l’hellénisme. Études de littérature antique offertes au Recteur Jacques Bompaire, ed. Billaut, A.. Paris: 169–78.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. (1926) Monolog und Selbstgespräch. Untersuchungen zur Formgeschichte der griechischen Tragödie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. (1955) ‘Furcht und Mitleid? Zur Deutung des Aristotelischen Tragödiensatzes’, Hermes 83/2: 129–71.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, J.-M. (2012) ‘Fictional vs. factual narration’, in The Living Handbook of Narratology, eds. Hühn, P. et al. www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/56.html.Google Scholar
Schäublin, C. (1985) ‘Konversionen in antiken Dialogen?’, in Catalepton. Festschrift für Bernhard Wyss zum 80. Geburtstag, ed. Schäublin, C.. Basel: 117–31.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1982) ‘The structure of Plutarch’s De audiendis poetis’, Mnemosyne 35/1–2: 60–71.Google Scholar
Schlapbach, K. (2010) ‘The logoi of philosophers in Lucian of Samosata’, ClAnt 29/2: 250–77.Google Scholar
Schleier, R. (1973) Tabula Cebetis oder ‘Spiegel des Menschlichen Lebens/darin Tugent und untugent abgemalet ist’. Studien zur Rezeption einer antiken Bildbeschreibung im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schlemm, A. (1893) De fontibus Plutarchi commentationum De audiendis poetis et De fortuna. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Schmid, W., Stählin, O. and von Christ, W. (eds.) (1929–48) Geschichte der griechischen Literatur. 7 vols. Munich.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. (1997) Bildung und Macht. Zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Schröder, B.-J. (2000) ‘“Eulen nach Athen”. Ein Vorschlag zu Lukians Nigrinus’, Hermes 128: 435–42.Google Scholar
Sciolla, L. (1988) Gli artifici della finzione poetica nella Storia Vera di Luciano. Foggia.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1975) ‘The logical status of fictional discourse’, New Literary History 6/2: 319–32.Google Scholar
Seddon, K. (2005) Epictetus’ Handbook and the Tablet of Cebes. Guides to Stoic Living. London.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. (1981) Tragedy and Civilization. An Interpretation of Sophocles. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. (2014) The Poetics of Phantasia. Imagination in Ancient Aesthetics. London.Google Scholar
Shiner, L. (2009) ‘Continuity and discontinuity in the concept of art’, British Journal of Aesthetics 49/2: 159–69.Google Scholar
Sider, S. (1979) Cebes’ Tablet. Facsimiles of the Greek Text, and of Selected Latin, French, English, Spanish, Italian, German, Dutch and Polish Translations. New York.Google Scholar
Sier, K. (2000) ‘Gorgias über die Fiktionalität der Tragödie’, in Dramatische Wäldchen. Festschrift für Eckard Lefèvre zum 65. Geburtstag, eds. Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G.. Hildesheim: 575–618.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W. (1987) ‘“Against interpretation”. Petronius and art criticism’, Ramus 16/1–2: 165–76.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2010a) ʻIntroduction. The art of art history in Greco-Roman antiquityʼ, Arethusa 43/2: 133–63.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2010b) ʻMaking Myron’s cow moo? Ecphrastic epigram and the poetics of simulationʼ, AJPh 131/4: 589–634.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2013) ʻApparitions apparent. Ekphrasis and the parameters of vision in the Elder Philostratus’s Imaginesʼ, Helios 40/1–2: 97–140.Google Scholar
Squire, M. and Grethlein, J. (2014) ‘“Counterfeit in character but persuasive in appearance”. Reviewing the ainigma of the Tabula Cebetis’, CPh 109/4: 285–324.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. (2001) Images in Mind. Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought. Princeton.Google Scholar
Stenger, J. (2004) Poetische Argumentation. Die Funktion der Gnomik in den Epinikien des Bakchylides. Berlin.Google Scholar
Stenger, J. (2015) ‘John Chrysostom and the power of literary imagination’, in Spätantike Konzeptionen von Literatur, ed. Stenger, J.. Heidelberg: 207–26.Google Scholar
Stenger, J. (2016) ‘Athens and/or Jerusalem? Basil’s and Chrysostom’s views on the didactic use of literature and stories, in Education and Religion in Late Antique Christianity, eds. Gemeinhardt, P., van Hoof, L. and van Nuffelen, P.. London: 86–100.Google Scholar
Sterling, G. E. (2014) ‘“The Jewish philosophy”. Reading Moses via Hellenistic philosophy according to Philo’, in Reading Philo. A Handbook to Philo of Alexandria, ed. Seland, T.. Grand Rapids: 129–54.Google Scholar
Stoevesandt, M. (2004) Feinde – Gegner – Opfer. Zur Darstellung der Troianer in den Kampfszenen der Ilias. Basel.Google Scholar
Stramaglia, A. (1999) Res inauditae, incredulae. Storie di fantasmi nel mondo greco-latino. Bari.Google Scholar
Suwajanakorn, S., Seitz, S. M. and Kemelmacher-Shlizerman, I. (2017) ‘Synthesizing Obama: Learning lipsync from audio’, ACM Transactions on Graphics 36/4: 1–13.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire. Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World, ad 50–250. Oxford.Google Scholar
Szlagor, B. (2005) Verflochtene Bilder. Lukians Porträtierung ‘göttlicher Männer’. Trier.Google Scholar
Szlezák, T. A. (2011) ‘Das Höhlengleichnis (Buch vii 514a–521b, 539d–541b)’, in Platon. Politeia, ed. Höffe, O.. Berlin: 155–74.Google Scholar
Tackaberry, W. H. (1930) Lucian’s Relation to Plato and the Post-Aristotelian Philosophers. Toronto.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. (2006) The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece. Religion, Society and Artistic Rationalisation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1977) The Stagecraft of Aeschylus. The Dramatic Use of Exits and Entrances in Greek Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tor, S. (2017) Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology. A Study of Hesiod, Xenophanes and Parmenides. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. B. (1997) ‘On the Tablet of Cebes’, in Aristotle and After, ed. Sorabji, R.. London: 159–80.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. H. (2003) Homo Viator. Itineraries of Exile, Displacement and Writing in Renaissance Europe. Geneva.Google Scholar
Ugolini, G. (1923) ‘L’evoluzione della critica letteraria d’Aristofane’, SIFC, N.S. 3/4: 215–46; 259–91.Google Scholar
Untersteiner, M. (1949) I sofisti. Testimonianze e frammenti, Vol. ii. Gorgia, Licofrone e Prodico. Florence.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. (1992) Twinkling and Twilight. Plutarch’s Reflections on Literature. Brussels.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1981) ‘Gorgias’ doctrine of deception’, in The Sophists and Their Legacy, ed. Kerferd, G. B.. Wiesbaden: 116–28.Google Scholar
Vetta, M. (ed.) (1995) Poesia e simposio nella Grecia antica. Guida storica e critica. Bari.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1988) Did the Greeks Believe in Their Myths? An Essay on the Constitutive Imagination. Chicago.Google Scholar
von Möllendorff, P. (2000a) Auf der Suche nach der verlogenen Wahrheit. Lukians Wahre Geschichten. Tübingen.Google Scholar
von Möllendorff, P. (ed.) (2000b) Lukian. Hermotimos oder Lohnt es sich, Philosophie zu studieren? Darmstadt.Google Scholar
von Möllendorff, P. (2006) ‘Sophistische Phantastik. Lukians Lügenfreunde’, in Fremde Wirklichkeiten. Literarische Phantastik und antike Literatur, eds. Hörnke, N. and Baumbach, M.. Heidelberg: 187–201.Google Scholar
von Reutern, G. (1933) Plutarchs Stellung zur Dichtkunst. Interpretation der Schrift De audiendis poetis. Kiel.Google Scholar
von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1913) Sappho und Simonides. Untersuchungen über griechische Lyriker. Berlin.Google Scholar
Walker, A. D. (1993) ‘Enargeia and the spectator in Greek historiography’, TAPhA 123: 353–77.Google Scholar
Walsh, G. B. (1984) The Varieties of Enchantment. Early Greek Views of the Nature and Function of Poetry. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Walsh, R. (2007) The Rhetoric of Fictionality. Narrative Theory and the Idea of Fiction (Theory and Interpretation of Narrative Series). Columbus.Google Scholar
Walton, K. L. (1990) Mimesis as Make-Believe. On the Foundations of Representational Arts. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2006) ʻThe Imagines as a fictional text. Ekphrasis, apatē and illusionʼ, in Le défi de l’art. Philostrate, Callistrate et l’image sophistique, ed. Costantini, M., Graziani, F. and Rolet, S.. Rennes: 113–36.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2009) Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham.Google Scholar
Weber, G. (1993) Dichtung und höfische Gesellschaft. Die Rezeption von Zeitgeschichte am Hof der ersten drei Ptolemäer. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Weber, H. (1998) ‘Bildpropaganda und Bildfälschung im Stalinismus’, in Bilder, die lügen. Begleitbuch zur Ausstellung der Stiftung Haus der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, ed. Hütter, H.W.. Bonn: 82–92.Google Scholar
Wedner, S. (1994) Tradition und Wandel im allegorischen Verständnis des Sirenenmythos. Ein Beitrag zur Rezeptionsgeschichte Homers. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1946) ‘Der erhabene und der schlichte Stil in der poetisch-rhetorischen Theorie der Antike’, in Phyllobolia. Für Peter von der Mühll zum 60. Geburtstag am 1. Aug. 1945, eds. Gigon, O., Meuli, K. et al. Basel: 9–34.Google Scholar
Weinstock, S. (1927) ʻDie platonische Homerkritik und ihre Nachwirkungʼ, Philologus 82: 121–53.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire. The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2005b) ‘Heliodorus smiles’, in Metaphor and the Ancient Novel, eds. Harrison, S., Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S.. Groningen: 87–105.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2011) Narrative and Identity in the Ancient Greek Novel. Returning Romance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wigodsky, M. (1995) ʻThe alleged impossibility of philosophical poetryʼ, in Philodemus and Poetry. Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, ed. Obbink, D.. New York: 58–68.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2002) ‘Languages on stage. Aristophanic language, cultural history and Athenian identity’, in The Language of Greek Comedy, ed. Willi, A.. Oxford: 111–49.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2003) The Languages of Aristophanes. Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek. Oxford.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2008) Sikelismos. Sprache, Literatur und Gesellschaft im griechischen Sizilien (8.–5. Jh. v. Chr.). Bibliotheca Helvetica Romana, Vol. 29. Basel.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. (2012) ‘Sophocles and philosophy’, in Brill’s Companion to Sophocles, ed. Markantonatos, A.. Leiden: 537–62.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. R. S. (1976) ‘The contents of the cave’, in New Essays on Plato and the Pre-Socratics, eds. Shiner, R. and King-Farlow, J.. Guelph: 117–27.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (2000) The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia. The Chorus, the City and the Stage. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. (1982) ‘The mendacity of Kalasiris and the narrative strategy of Heliodoros’ Aithiopika’, YClS 27: 93–158.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I. (eds.) (1990) Nothing to Do with Dionysus? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context. Princeton.Google Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1954–5) ‘The Electra of Sophocles. Prolegomena to an interpretation’, PCPhS 3: 20–6.Google Scholar
Wolf, W. (1993) Ästhetische Illusion und Illusionsdurchbrechung in der Erzählkunst. Theorie und Geschichte mit Schwerpunkt auf englischem illusionsstörenden Erzählen. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Wolf, W. (2008) ‘Is aesthetic illusion “illusion référentielle”? “Immersion” in (narrative) representations and its relationship to fictionality and factuality’, Journal of Literary Theory 2/1: 99–126.Google Scholar
Wolf, W. (2013a) ‘Preface’, in Immersion and Distance. Aesthetic Illusion in Literature and Other Media. Studies in Intermediality 6, eds. Wolf, W., Bernhart, W. and Mahler, A.. Amsterdam: v–vi.Google Scholar
Wolf, W. (2013b) ‘Aesthetic illusion’, in Immersion and Distance. Aesthetic Illusion in Literature and Other Media. Studies in Intermediality 6, eds. Wolf, W., Bernhart, W. and Mahler, A.. Amsterdam: 1–63.Google Scholar
Worman, N. (2015) Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wytzes, J. (1957) ‘The twofold way (i). Platonic influences in the work of Clement of Alexandria’, VChr 11: 226–45.Google Scholar
Wytzes, J. (1960) ‘The twofold way (ii). Platonic influences in the work of Clement of Alexandria’, VChr 14: 129–53.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. (2002) ‘Safe drugs for the good boys. Platonism and pedagogy in Plutarch’s De audiendis poetis’, in Sage and Emperor. Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals, and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 ad), eds. Stadter, P. A. and Van der Stockt, L.. Leuven: 297–314.Google Scholar
Zangara, A. (2008) ʻVoir l’histoire. Théories anciennes du récit historique. Présentationʼ, Anabases 7: 249–56.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. (1981) ‘Enargeia in the ancient criticism of poetry’, RhM 124/3–4: 297–311.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. (2015) ‘The contexts and experience of poetry and art in the Hellenistic world’, in A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics, eds. Destrée, P. and Murray, P.. Chichester: 47–67.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1981) ‘Travesties of gender and genre in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazousae’, Critical Inquiry 8/2: 301–27.Google Scholar
Zipfel, F. (2001) Fiktion, Fiktivität, Fiktionalität: Analysen zur Fiktion in der Literatur und zum Fiktionsbegriff in der Literaturwissenschaft (= Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft: Wuppertaler Schriften, Vol. ii). Berlin.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (2003) ‘The immersed experiencer. Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension’, Psychology of Learning and Motivation 44: 35–62.Google Scholar