Adger, Carolyn Temple, Wolfram, Walt and Christian, Donna. 2007. Dialects in Schools and Communities, 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Adger, David. 2006. Combinatorial variability. Journal of Linguistics 42, 503–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adger, David 2007. Variability and modularity: a response to Hudson. Journal of Linguistics 43, 695–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adger, David and Smith, Jennifer. 2005. Variation and the Minimalist Programme. In Cornips, and Corrigan, (eds.), 149–78.

Adger, David and Trousdale, Graeme. 2007. Variation in English syntax: theoretical implications. English Language and Linguistics 11, 261–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agard, Frederick. 1971. Language and dialect: some tentative postulates. Linguistics 65, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agheyisi, Rebecca and Fishman, Joshua A.. 1970. Language attitude studies: a brief survey of methodological approaches. Anthropological Linguistics 12, 137–57.Google Scholar

Aitken, A. J. 1981. The Scottish vowel-length rule. In Benskin, Michael and Samuels, Michael (eds.) So meny People, Longages and Tonges, 131–57. Edinburgh: The Middle English Dialect Project.Google Scholar

Allen, Harold (ed.). 1976. The Linguistic Atlas of the Upper Midwest. Vol. III: The Pronunciation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Allen, Will, Beal, Joan, Corrigan, Karen, Maguire, Warren and Moisl, Hermann. 2007. A linguistic ‘time capsule’: The Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English. In Beal, Corrigan and Moisl, (eds.), Vol. II, 16–48.

Ammon, Ulrich, Dittmar, Norbert, Mattheier, Klaus and Trudgill, Peter (eds.). 2006. Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Andersen, Gisle. 1997. ‘They gave us these yeah, and they like wanna see like how we talk and all that’: the use of like and other discourse markers in London teenage speech. In Kostinas, Ulla-Britt, Stenström, Anna-Brita and Karlsson, Anna-Malin (eds.) Ungdomsspråk i Norden, MINS 43, 83–95. Stockholm University, Institutionene für nordiska språk.Google Scholar

Andersen, Gisle 1998. The pragmatic marker like from a Relevance-Theoretic perspective. In Jucker, Andreas and Ziv, Yael (eds.) Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, 147–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Andersen, Gisle 2001. Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Peter M. 1987. A Structural Atlas of the English Dialects. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Angermeyer, Philipp S. 2009. Translation style and participant roles in court interpreting. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anton, Howard. 2005. Elementary Linear Algebra, 9th edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley International.Google Scholar

Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In Hinskens, Hout and Wetzels, (eds.), 35–68.

Anttila, Arto 2002a. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anttila, Arto 2002b. Variation and phonological theory. In Chambers, Trudgill and Schilling-Estes, (eds.), 206–43.

Arseniuk, Melissa. 2008. FBI expert testifies at O. J. Simpson robbery/kidnapping trial. Las Vegas Sun 17 September 2008. www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/sep/17/ fbi-expert-testifies-simpson-robberykidnapping-tri/ (last accessed 30 October 2008).

Asprey, Esther C. 2008. Black Country English and Black Country Identity. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Atal, Bishnu S. and Hanauer, Suzanne L.. 1971. Speech analysis and synthesis by linear predictive coding of the speech wave. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 50, 637–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avery, Peter, Chambers, J. K., Alexandra, D'Arcy, Gold, Elaine and Rice, Keren (eds.). 2006. Canadian English in the Global Context. Special issue of Canadian Journal of Linguistics 51.

Baayen, R. Harald, Piepenbrock, Richard and Gulikers, Léon. 1995. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

,BBC. 2002. Witness walks out of Damilola trial. Available online at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/1802072.stm, 5th February, 2002 (last accessed 5 August 2010).

,BBC. 2008. Rhys witness refuses to testify. Available online at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/7695628.stm. Page last updated at 18:07 GMT, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 (last accessed 5 August 2010).

Bailey, Charles-James N. 1973. Variation and Linguistic Theory. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Bailey, Charles-James N. 1980. Conceptualizing dialects as implicational constellations rather than as entities bounded by isoglossic bundles. Chapter 4 of Bailey (1996). Originally in Göschel, J., Ivić, P. and Kehy, K. (eds.) Dialekt und Dialektology. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

Bailey, Charles-James N. 1996. Essays on Time-Based Linguistic Analysis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom and Sand, Lori. 1991. The focus of linguistic innovation in Texas. English World-Wide 12, 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan and Sand, Lori. 1991. The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3, 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan and Sand, Lori 1993. Some patterns of linguistic diffusion. Language Variation and Change 5, 359–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, Charles. 1993. The English Language: A Historical Introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barbiers, Sjef, Koeneman, Olaf, Lekakou, Marika and Ham, Margreet (eds.). 2002. Syntactic Doubling in European Dialects. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Barbujani, Guido. 2000. Geographical patterns: how to identify them, and why. Human Biology 72, 133–53.Google Scholar

Barbujani, Guido 2005. Human races: classifying people vs understanding diversity. Current Genomics 6, 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbujani, Guido, Bertorelle, Giorgio and Chikhi, Lounès. 1998. Evidence for Paleolithic and Neolithic gene flow in Europe. American Journal of Human Genetics 62, 488–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bard, Ellen, Robertson, Dan and Sorace, Antonella. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Peter. 1984. Orkney and Shetland Norn. In Trudgill, (ed.), 352–66.

Baron, Naomi. 2004. See you online: gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23, 397–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 1993. Manual of Information to Accompany the Wellington Corpus of New Zealand English. Wellington: Department of Linguistics, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie 2002. Inferring variation and change from public corpora. In Chambers, Trudgill and Shilling-Estes, (eds.), 97–114.

Baugh, Albert C. and Cable, Thomas. 2002. A History of the English Language, 5th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Joel (eds.). 1974. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge University Press.

Bayley, Robert. 1994. Consonant cluster reduction in Tejano English. Language Variation and Change 6, 303–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 1993. The grammar of Tyneside and Northumbrian English. In Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley (eds.) Real English: Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles, 187–213. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 2004. The morphology and syntax of English dialects in the north of England. In Kortmann, , Schneider, , Burridge, Mesthrie and Upton, (eds.), 114–41.

Beal, Joan C. and Corrigan, Karen P.. 2005. A tale of two dialects: relativization in Newcastle and Sheffield. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, Marjatta, Palander and Penttilä, Esa (eds.) Dialects Across Borders: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology (Methods XI), Joensuu, August 2002. CILT, 273, 211–29 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C., Corrigan, Karen P. and Moisl, Hermann L. (eds.). 2007a. Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Volume I: Synchronic Databases. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Beal, Joan C., Corrigan, Karen P. and Moisl, Hermann L. (eds.). 2007b. Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Volume II: Diachronic Databases. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Beckman, Mary E. and Hirschberg, Julia. 1994. The ToBI annotation conventions. Online typescript. www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~tobi/ame_tobi/annotation_conventions.html (last accessed 1 August 2010).

Bede, the Venerable. 731. Ecclesiastical History of the English People, 1990 Penguin edition, translated by Sherley-Price, Leo, edited with new introduction and notes by Farmer, D. H.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Behre, Karl-Ernst. 2007. A new Holocene sea-level curve for the southern North Sea. Boreas 36(1), 82–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13, 145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellwood, Peter and Renfrew, Colin (eds.). 2002. Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Monograph series.

Bender, Emily. 2007. Socially meaningful syntactic variation in sign-based grammar. English Language and Linguistics 11, 347–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benincà, Paola and Poletto, Cecilia. 2007. The ASIS enterprise: a view on the construction of a syntactic atlas for the Northern Italian dialects. In Bentzen, Kristine and ØVangsnes, Ystein (eds.) Scandiavian Dialect Syntax 2005, Nordlyd 34, 35–52.

Berk-Seligson, Susan. 1990. Bilingual court proceedings: the role of the court interpreter. In Levi, and Walker, (eds.), 155–201.CrossRef

Berk-Seligson, Susan 1999. The impact of court interpreting on the coerciveness of leading questions. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 6(1), 30–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berk-Seligson, Susan 2002. The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Cynthia. 1993. Measuring social causes of phonological variables. American Speech 68, 227–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas 1993. Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8, 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Blake, Renée and Josey, Meredith. 2003. The /ay/ diphthong in a Martha's Vineyard community: what can we say 40 years later?Language in Society 32(4), 451–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blatchford, Helen and Foulkes, Paul. 2006. Identification of voices in shouting. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 13(2), 241–54.Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2001. Investigating narrative inequality: African asylum seekers' stories in Belgium. Discourse and Society 12(4), 413–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1944. Secondary and tertiary responses to language. Language 20, 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blyth, Tom and Robertson, Edmund. 2002. Basic Linear Algebra, 2nd edn. Heidelberg and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boersma, Paul and Hayes, Bruce. 2001. Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brennan, Mary and Brown, Richard. 2004. Equality Before the Law: Deaf People's Access to Justice. Durham: Deaf Studies Research Unit, University of Durham.Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Deo, Ashwini and Sharma, Devyani. 2007. Typology in variation: a probabilistic approach to be and n't in the Survey of English Dialects. English Language and Linguistics 11, 301–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britain, David. 1992. Linguistic change in intonation: the use of high rising terminals in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 4, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britain, David 1997. Dialect contact and phonological reallocation: ‘Canadian raising’ in the English Fens. Language in Society 26, 15–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britain, David 2002. Space and spatial diffusion. In Chambers, Trudgill and Schilling-Estes, (eds.), 603–37.

Bromham, Lindell and Penny, David. 2003. The modern molecular clock. Nature Reviews Genetics 4, 216–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, Keith (ed.). 2006. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Brown-Blake, Celia. 2008. The right to linguistic non-discrimination and Creole language situations: the case of Jamaica. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23(1), 32–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown-Blake, Celia and Chambers, Paul. 2007. The Jamaican creole speaker in the UK Criminal Justice System. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 14(2), 269–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary. 1999. ‘Why be normal?’: language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28, 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary and Hall, Kira. 2005. Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7, 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle and Corrigan, Karen P.. 2008. Tapping into the intuitions of dialect speakers in Northern England and Scotland: data, methods and their implications. Paper presented at the Edisyn workshop for Syntactic Atlas projects. Venice, September 2008.

Buchstaller, Isabelle, Corrigan, Karen P. and Holmberg, Anders. Forthcoming. Introspective judgements and sociolinguistic interviews as testing instruments for revealing syntactic microvariation. In Parrot, Jeff (ed.) Theoretical Perspectives on Intra-Individual Variation and its Empirical Study. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Buchstaller, Isabelle and Alexandra, D'Arcy. 2009. Localized globalization: a multi-local, multivariate investigation of quotative be like. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13, 291–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunnin, Nicholas and Yu, Jiyuan. 2009. The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Burbano-Elizondo, Lourdes. 2006. Regional variation and identity in Sunderland. In Omoniyi, Tope and White, Goodith (eds.) Sociolinguistics of Identity, 113–28. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Burbano-Elizondo, Lourdes 2008. Language variation and identity in Sunderland. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar

Burridge, Kate and Kortmann, Bernd (eds.). 2008. Varieties of English 3: The Pacific and Australasia. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Butters, Ronald R. 1991. Review of Dennis Preston, Perceptual Dialectology. Language in Society 20, 294–9.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrne, Catherine and Foulkes, Paul. 2004. The ‘mobile phone effect’ on vowel formants. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 11(1), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calafell, Francese, Roubinet, Francis, Ramirez-Soriano, Anna, Saltou, Naruya, Bertranpetit, Jaume and Blancher, Antoine. 2008. Evolutionary dynamics of the human ABO gene. Human Genetics 124, 123–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cambier-Langeveld, Tina. 2007. Current methods in forensic speaker identification: results of a collaborative exercise. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 14(2), 223–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Deborah and Kulick, Don. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Deborah and Kulick, Don 2005. Identity crisis?Language and Communication 25, 107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Deborah, McAlinden, Fiona and Kathy, O'Leary. 1989. Lakoff in context: the social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In Coates, Jennifer and Cameron, Deborah (eds.) Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, 74–93. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2005. Listener perceptions of sociolinguistic variables: the case of (ING). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82, 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, , Kathryn, Penelope Eckert, Mendoza-Denton, Norma and Moore, Emma. 2006. The elements of style. Poster presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 35, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar

Capelli, C., Redhead, N., Abernethy, J. K., et al. 2003. A Y chromosome census of the British Isles. Current Biology 13, 979–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardi, Valeria. 2007. Regional or minority language use before judicial authorities: provisions and facts. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 6(2), 1–24.Google Scholar

Carr, Philip. 1993. Phonology. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, Philip 2006. Philosophy of linguistics. In Brown, Keith (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Carter, Phillip M. 2005. Quantifying rhythmic differences between Spanish, English, and Hispanic English. In Gess, Randall S. and Ruben, Edward J. (eds.) Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics, 63–75. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi Luca 2000. Genes, Peoples and Language, trans. Mark Seielstad. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar

Cavalli-Sforza, , Luca, Luigi, Menozzi, Paolo and Piazza, Alberto. 1994. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi Luca, Wilson, A. C., Cantor, C. R., Deegan, R. M. and King, M. C.. 1991. Call for a worldwide survey of human genetic diversity: a vanishing opportunity for the Human Genome Project. Genomics 11, 490–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cedergren, Henrietta. 1973. The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. Unpublished dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Cedergren, Henrietta and Sankoff, David. 1974. Variable rules: performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50, 333–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, Alan. 1999. What is this Thing Called Science? 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K. 1994. An introduction to dialect topography. English World-Wide 15, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Jack 1998. Social embedding of changes in progress. Journal of English Linguistics 26(1), 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Jack 2002. Patterns of variation including change. In Chambers, Trudgill and Schilling-Estes, (eds.), 349–72.

Chambers, Jack 2003. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K. and Trudgill, Peter. 1980. Dialectology. (2nd edn, 1998). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Natalie, Schilling-Estes (eds.). 2002. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.

Chaski, Carole E. 2001. Empirical evaluations of language-based author identification techniques. Forensic Linguistics 8(1), 1–65.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny. 1982a. Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny 1982b. Linguistic variation and social function. In Romaine, Suzanne (ed.) Sociolinguistic Variation in Speech Communities, 153–75. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny (ed.). 1991. English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Cheshire, Jenny. 1999. Taming the vernacular: some repercussions for the study of syntactic variation and spoken grammar. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 8, 59–80.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny 2005. Sociolinguistics and mother-tongue education. In Ammon, Dittmar, Mattheier, and Trudgill, (eds.), 2341–50.

Cheshire, Jenny and Edwards, Viv. 1989. The Survey of British Dialect Grammar. In Cheshire, Edwards, Münstermann, and Weltens, (eds.), 200–15.

Cheshire, Jenny, Viv Edwards, Henk Münstermann and Weltens, Bert (eds.). 1989. Dialect and Education: Some European Perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1980. Rules and Representations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1986 Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Clarke, Sandra, Elms, Ford and Youssef, Amani. 1995. The third dialect of English: some Canadian evidence. Language Variation and Change 7, 209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia and Paolillo, John. 2006. North American English vowels: a factor-analytic perspective. Literary and Linguistic Computing 21(4), 445–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia and Pisoni, David. 2002. Perception of dialect variation: some implications for current research and theory in speech perception. Research on Spoken Language Processing: Progress Report No. 25. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia and Pisoni, David 2005. Perceptual free classification of dialect variation. Paper presented at the Twelfth International Conference on Methods in Dialectology, Université de Moncton.

Coates, Jennifer (ed.). 1998. Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

Coates, Richard. 2007. Invisible Britons: the view from linguistics. In Higham, (ed.), 172–91.

Coates, Richard and Breeze, Andrew, with a contribution by David Horovitz. 2000. Celtic Voices, English Places. Stamford: Shaun Tyas.Google Scholar

Coetzee, Andrew. 2004. What it means to be a loser: non-optimal candidates in optimality theory. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar

Coetzee, Andrew and Pater, Joe. To appear. The place of variation in phonological theory. In Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason and Yu, Alan (eds.) The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

Collins, Peter C. 2005. The modals and quasi-modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English and other Englishes. English World-Wide 26, 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conley, John M., O'Barr, William M. and Lind, E. Allen. 1978. The power of language: presentational style in the courtroom. Duke Law Journal 6, 1375–99.Google Scholar

Cooke, Michael. 1995. Aboriginal evidence in the cross-cultural courtroom. In Eades, Diana (ed.) Language in Evidence: Issues Confronting Multi-Cultural Australia, 55–96. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie and Corrigan, Karen P. (eds.). 2005. Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Cornips, Leonie and Jongenburger, Willy. 2001. Elicitation techniques in a Dutch syntactic dialect atlas project. In Broekhuis, Hans and Wouden, Ton (eds.) Linguistics in The Netherlands 2001 18, 161–84. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie and Poletto, Cecilia. 2005. On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques, PART I. Lingua 115(7), 939–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornips, Leonie and Poletto, Cecilia 2008. Field linguistics meets formal research. Unpublished manuscript, Meertens Institute, Amsterdam.

Cotterill, Janet. 2004. Language in the Legal Process. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cotterill, Janet 2007. The Language of Sexual Crime. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coulthard, Malcolm. 1992. Forensic discourse analysis. In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, 242–58. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Coulthard, Malcolm 1993. Beginning the study of forensic texts: corpus, concordance, collocation. In Hoey, Michael (ed.) Data, Description, Discourse, 86–97. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Coulthard, Malcolm 1994a. On the use of corpora in the analysis of forensic texts. Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 1(1), 27–43.Google Scholar

Coulthard, Malcolm 1994b. Powerful evidence for the defence: an exercise in forensic discourse analysis. In Gibbons, (ed.), 414–27.

Coulthard, Malcolm 1995. Questioning Statements: Forensic Applications of Linguistics. University of Birmingham, English Language Research papers.Google Scholar

Coulthard, Malcolm 2002. Whose voice is it? Invented and concealed dialogue in written records of verbal evidence produced by the police. In Cotterill, Janet (ed.) Language in the Legal Process, 19–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Coulthard, Malcolm 2004. Author identification, idiolect and linguistic uniqueness. Applied Linguistics 25(4), 431–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coulthard, Malcolm and Johnson, Alison. 2007. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 1988. Dialect in Use: Sociolinguistic Variation in Cardiff English. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas 2007a. The discursive framing of phonological acts of identity: Welshness through English. In Brutt-Griffler, Janina and Davies, Catherine Evans (eds.) English and Ethnicity, 19–48. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas 2007b. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Crinson, James and Williamson, John. 2004. Non-standard dialect in the formal speech of 15-year-olds on Tyneside. Language and Education 18, 207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 1995. Rises in English. In Lewis, Windsor (ed.), 155–73.

Crystal, David. 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of The English Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, David 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crystal, David 2003. English as a Global Language, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crystal, David 2008. Txting: the gr8 db8. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, David and Davy, Derek. 1969. Investigating English Style. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Cunliffe, Barry W. 2003. The Celts: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cutler, Cecilia. 2002. Crossing over: white teenagers, hip-hop, and African American English. Unpublished dissertation, New York University.

D'Arcy, Alexandra. 2001. Beyond mastery: a study of dialect acquisition. Unpublished M.A. thesis. St John's: Memorial University of Newfoundland.

D'Arcy, Alexandra 2005a. Like: syntax and development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto.

D'Arcy, Alexandra 2005b. The development of linguistic constraints: Phonological innovations in St. John's. Language Variation and Change 17, 327–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D'Arcy, Alexandra 2007. Like and language ideology: disentangling fact from fiction. American Speech 82, 386–419.

D'Arcy, Alexandra 2008. Canadian English as a window to the rise of like in discourse. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies 19, 125–40.Google Scholar

Dailey-O'Cain, Jennifer. 1999. The perception of post-unification German regional speech. In Preston, (ed.).

Davies, Bethan. 2005. Communities of practice: legitimacy not choice. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9, 557–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2002–. Online Corpora, http://corpus.byu.edu/.

Decker, Paul. 2002. Beyond the city limits: the Canadian vowel shift in an Ontario small town. Unpublished MA thesis, York University.Google Scholar

Decker, Ken. 2000. The use of Belize Kriol to improve English proficiency. Paper presented at the 5th International Creole Workshop, Florida International University.

Dediu, Dan and Robert Ladd, D.. 2007. Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104, 10944–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Delaunay, Boris. 1934. Sur la sphère vide. Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Classe des Sciences Mathématiques et Naturelles 7(6), 793–800.Google Scholar

Delin, Judy, Searle-Jones, Abi and Waller, Rob. 2006. Branding and relationship communications: the evolution of utility bills in the UK. In Carliner, Saul, Verckens, Jan Piet and Waele, Cathy (eds.) Information and Document Design, 27–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Denbo, Seth, Haskins, Heather and Robey, David. 2008. Sustainability of Digital Outputs from AHRC Resource Enhancement Projects. Report to the Arts and Humanities Research Council. December 2008. Available online at www.ahrcict.rdg.ac.uk/activities/review/sustainability.htm (last accessed 4 August 2010).Google Scholar

Denham, Kristin and Lobeck, Anne (eds.). 2005. Language in the Schools: Integrating Linguistic Knowledge into K-12 Teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Denham, Kristin and Lobeck, Anne (eds.). 2009. Linguistics at School: Language Awareness in Primary and Secondary Education. Cambridge University Press.

Denison, David. 1998. Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.) The Cambridge History of the English Language, Volume IV: 1776–1997, 92–329. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Government, Department for Communities and Local. 2004. The Party Wall Act etc. 1996: Explanatory Leaflet. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Government, Department for Communities and Local 2008. Planning Portal: The Party Wall Act etc. (1996). Available online at www.planningportal.gov.uk/england/genpub/en/1115314019877.html (last accessed 5 August 2010).

DfEE, . 1999. The National Curriculum for England: English. London: Department for Education and Employment and the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar

,Department for Environment, F. a. R. A. 2008. Press release: DEFRA launches consultation on animal welfare codes of practice.

Deterding, David. 2001. The measurement of rhythm: a comparison of Singapore and British English. Journal of Phonetics 29, 217–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diercks, Willy. 2002. Mental maps: linguistic geographic concepts. In Long, and Preston, (eds.), 51–70.CrossRef

Di Paolo, Marianna and Faber, Alice. 1990. Phonetic difference and the phonetic content of the tense-lax contrast in Utah English. Language Variation and Change 2, 155–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Docherty, Gerard J. and Foulkes, Paul. 1999. Derby and Newcastle: instrumental phonetics and variationist studies. In Foulkes, and Docherty, (eds.), 47–71.

Docherty, Gerard J., Foulkes, Paul, Milroy, James, Milroy, Leslie and Walshaw, David. 1997. Descriptive adequacy in phonology: a variationist perspective. Journal of Linguistics 33, 275–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, Stefan. 2008. New-Dialect Formation in Canada: Evidence from the English Modal Auxiliaries. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorling, Daniel, Ford, J., Holmans, A. E. and Regan, S.. 2005. The Great Divide: An Analysis of Housing Inequality. London: Shelter.Google Scholar

Douglas-Cowie, , Ellen, Roddy Cowie and Rahilly, Joan. 1995. The social distribution of intonation patterns in Belfast. In Lewis, Windsor (ed.), 180–6.

Drager, Katie and Hay, Jennifer. 2006. Can you really believe your ears? The effect of stuffed toys on speech perception. Paper presented at New Zealand Language Society Conference, Christchurch.

Du Bois, John W. 2002. Stance and consequence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans.

Dumas, Bethany. 1990. Adequacy of cigarette package warnings: an analysis of the adequacy of federally mandated cigarette package warnings. In Levi, and Walker, (eds.), 309–57.CrossRef

Durie, Mark and Ross, Malcolm. 1996. The Comparative Method Reviewed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eades, Diana. 1994. A case of communication clash: Aboriginal English and the legal system. In Gibbons, (ed.), 234–64.

Eades, Diana 2008. Courtroom Talk and Neocolonial Control. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eades, Diana and Arends, Jacques. 2004. Using language analysis in the determination of national origin of asylum seekers: an introduction. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 11(2), 179–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 1988. Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change. Language in Society 17, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Penelope 1989. The whole woman: sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1, 245–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Penelope 1998. Gender and sociolinguistic variation. In Coates, (ed.), 64–75.

Eckert, Penelope 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity at Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope 2003. The meaning of style. Texas Linguistic Forum 47, 41–53.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope 2005. Variation, convention, and social meaning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Available at www.stanford.edu/~eckert/EckertLSA2005.pdf (last accessed 2 August 2010).

Eckert, Penelope 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12, 453–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Penelope and McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1992. Think practically and look locally: language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21, 461–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R. (eds.). 2001. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge University Press.

Edwards, John. 1982. Language attitudes and their implications. In Ryan, and Giles, (eds.), 20–33.

Edwards, John 2006. Educational failure. In Brown, Keith (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Ellegård, Alvar. 1953. The Auxiliary Do: The Establishment and Regulation of Its Use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar

Ellis, Stanley. 1956. Dialect-hunting by caravan. University of Leeds Review 5 (1956–1957), 39–48.Google Scholar

Ellis, Stanley 1994. The Yorkshire Ripper enquiry: Part I. Forensic Linguistics 1(2), 197–206.Google Scholar

Elsworth, C. 2008. OJ Simpson audio of alleged raid may have been tampered with. The Daily Telegraph, 18 September 2008. Available online at www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/celebritynews/2981171/OJ-Simpson-audio-of-alleged-raid-may-have-been-tampered-with.html (last accessed 5 August 2010).Google Scholar

Embleton, Sheila. 1987. Multidimensional scaling as a dialectometrical technique. In Babitch, Rose M. (ed.) Papers from the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association, 33–49. New Brunswick: Centre Universitaire de Shippagan.Google Scholar

Embleton, Sheila 2000. Lexicostatistics/glottochronology: from Swadesh to Sankoff to Starostin to future horizons. In Renfrew, Colin, McMahon, April and Trask, Robert L. (eds.) Time Depth in Historical Linguistics, 2 vols, 143–66. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar

Embleton, Sheila, Uritescu, Dorin and Wheeler, Eric. 2007. Data capture and presentation in the Romanian Online Dialect Atlas. Papers from 12th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology (Linguistica Atlantica 27–8, 2007).

Embleton, Sheila and Wheeler, Eric. 1997. Multidimensional scaling and the SED data. In Viereck, and Ramisch, (eds.), 5–11.

Eriksson, Andrew and Lacerda, Francisco. 2007. Charlatanry in forensic speech science: a problem to be taken seriously. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 14(2), 169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Errington, Joseph. 1985. On the nature of the sociolinguistic sign: describing the Javanese speech levels. In Mertz, Elizabeth and Parmentier, Richard J. (eds.) Semiotic Mediation, 287–310. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Esling, John H. 1978. The identification of features of voice quality in social groups. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 7, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everitt, Brian, Landau, Sabine and Leese, Morven. 2001. Cluster Analysis, 4th edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Facchinetti, Roberta, Krug, Manfred and Palmer, Frank (eds.). 2003. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef

Fairon, Cédrick. 2000. GlossaNet: parsing a web site as a corpus. Lingvisticae Investigationes 22, 327–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falconer, Douglas S. and Mackay, Trudy F. C.. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Harlow: Longmans.Google Scholar

Fasold, Ralph W. 1984. The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fasold, Ralph W. 1991. The quiet demise of variable rules. American Speech 66, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fasold, Ralph W. and Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.). 1989. Language Change and Variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef

Featherston, Sam 2005. Magnitude estimation and what it can do for your syntax: some wh-constraints in German. Lingua 115, 1525–50.

Felsenstein, Joseph. 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Fennell, Barbara A. 2001. A History of English. A Sociolinguistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ferrara, Kathleen, Brunner, Hans and Whittemore, Greg. 1991. Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication 8, 8–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Filippula, Markku and Klemola, Juhani. 2009. Special issue on re-evaluating the Celtic hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics 13(2), 155–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finegan, Edward. 1997. Sociolinguistics and the law. In Coulmas, Florian (ed.) The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 421–35. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Finnegan, Katie. Forthcoming. Dialect levelling in Sheffield English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sheffield.

Fisher, Simon E., Lai, Cecilia S. L. and Monaco, Anthony P.. 2003. Deciphering the genetic basis of speech and language disorders. Annual Review of Neuroscience 26, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Flanigan, Beverly Olson and Norris, Franklin Paul. 2000. Cross-dialectal comprehension as evidence for boundary mapping: perceptions of the speech of southeastern Ohio. Language Variation and Change 12, 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, Janet, Grabe, Esther and Warren, Paul. 2005. Intonational variation in four dialects of English: the high rising tone. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 396–409. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Flew, Antony and Priest, Stephen. 2002. A Dictionary of Philosophy, 3rd edn. London: PanMacmillan.Google Scholar

Forster, Peter, Harding, Rosalind, Torroni, Antonio and Bandelt, Hans-Jurgen. 1996. Origin and evolution of Native American mtDNA variation: a reappraisal. American Journal of Human Genetics 59, 935–45.Google ScholarPubMed

Foulkes, Paul and Barron, Anthony. 2000. Telephone speaker recognition amongst members of a close social network. Forensic Linguistics 7(2), 180–98.Google Scholar

Foulkes, Paul and Docherty, Gerard J. (eds.). 1999. Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold.

Foulkes, Paul and Docherty, Gerard J.. 2000. Another chapter in the story of /r/: ‘labiodental’ variants in British English. Journal of Sociolinguistics4, 30–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foulkes, Paul and Docherty, Gerard J.. 2006. The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34, 409–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fourakis, Marios and Port, Robert. 1986. Stop epenthesis in English. Journal of Phonetics 14, 197–221.Google Scholar

Fox, Anthony. 1995. Linguistic Reconstruction: An Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fox, Gwyneth. 1993. A comparison of ‘policespeak’ and ‘normalspeak’: a preliminary study. In Sinclair, John M., Hoey, Michael and Fox, Gwyneth (eds.) Techniques of Description: A Festschrift for Malcolm Coulthard, 183–95. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Francis, W. Nelson and Kučera, Henry. 1964. A Standard Corpus of Present-day Edited American English. Providence, RI: Brown University.Google Scholar

French, Peter. 1994. An overview of forensic phonetics with particular reference to speaker identification. Forensic Linguistics 1(2), 169–81.Google Scholar

French, Peter and Harrison, Philip. 2007. Position statement concerning use of impressionistic likelihood terms in forensic speaker comparison cases. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 14(1), 139–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

French, Peter, Harrison, Philip and Lewis, Jack Windsor. 2006. R v. John Samuel Humble: the Yorkshire Ripper Hoaxer trial. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 13(2), 255–73.Google Scholar

Fromont, Robert and Hay, Jennifer. 2008. ONZE Miner: the development of a browser-based research tool. Corpora 3(2), 173–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garside, Roger. 1987. The CLAWS word-tagging system. In Garside, Roger, Leech, Geoffrey and Sampson, Geoffrey (eds.) The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-based Approach, 30–41. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Gibbons, John (ed.). 1994. Language and the Law. Essex: Longman.

Gibbons, John. 2001. Legal transformations in Spanish: an ‘audencia’ in Chile. Forensic Linguistics 8(2), 24–43.Google Scholar

Gibbons, John 2006. Forensic sociolinguistics. In Ammon, Dittmar, Mattheier, and Trudgill, (eds.), 2316–23.

Gibbons, John 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz. 1992. English Phonology: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giles, Howard (ed.). 1977. Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.

Giles, Howard (ed.). 2002. Law Enforcement, Communication and Community. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Giles, Howard and Bourhis, Richard Y.. 1976. Voice and racial categorisation in Britain. Communication Monographs 43, 108–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilles, Peter and Peters, Jörg (eds.). 2004. Regional Variation in Intonation. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Glauser, Beat. 1974. The Scottish-English Linguistic Border. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar

Goebl, Hans 1984. Dialektometrische Studien: Anhand italoromanischer, rätoromanischer und galloromanischer Sprachmaterialien aus AIS und ALF, 3 Vols. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Goebl, Hans 1993. Dialectometry. A short overview of the principles and practice of quantitative classification of linguistic atlas data. In Köhler, Reinhard and Rieger, Burghard (eds.) Contributions to Quantitative Linguistics, 277–315. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Goebl, Hans. 1997. Some dendrographic classifications of the data of CLAE 1 and CLAE 2. InViereck, and Ramisch, (eds.), 23–32.

Goebl, Hans 2006. Recent advances in Salzburg dialectometry. Literary and Linguistic Computing 21, 411–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goebl, Hans 2007. A bunch of dialectometrical flowers: a brief introduction to dialectometry. In Ute Smit, Stefan Dollinger, Hüttner, Julia, Kaltenböck, Gunther and Lutzky, Ursula (eds.) Tracing English Through Time: Explorations in Language Variation. Austrian Studies in English 95, 133–71.

Goebl, Hans and Schiltz, Guillaume. 1997. A dialectometrical compilation of CLAE 1 and CLAE 2. Isoglosses and dialect integration. In Viereck, and Ramisch, (eds.), 13–21.

Goodey, B. 1971a. City Scene: An Exploration into the Image of Central Birmingham as Seen by Area Residents. Birmingham University Research Memorandum 10.Google Scholar

Goodey, B. 1971b. Perception of the Environment: An Introduction to the Literature. University of Birmingham: Centre for Urban and Regional Studies.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Goodwin, Charles and Yaeger-Dror, Malcah. 2002. Multi-modality in girls' game disputes. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1621–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gooskens, Charlotte and Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Perceptive evaluation of Levenshtein Dialect Distance measurements using Norwegian dialect data. Language Variation and Change 16, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Elizabeth [with Hervey, S., Leitch, R. and Holstein], E.. 1996. Exploring Language: A Handbook for New Zealand Teachers. Wellington: Ministry for Education and Learning Media.Google Scholar

Gordon, Elizabeth, Campbell, Lyle, Hay, Jennifer, Maclagan, Margaret, Sudbury, Andrea and Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New Zealand English. Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Elizabeth, Maclagan, Margaret and Hay, Jennifer. 2007. The ONZE corpus. In Beal, Corrigan and Moisl, (eds.), Vol. II, 82–104.

Gould, Peter and White, Rodney. 1986. Mental Maps, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Grabe, Esther. 2004. Intonational variation in urban dialects of English spoken in the British Isles. In Gilles, and Peters, (eds.), 9–31.

Grabe, Esther, Post, Brechtje, Nolan, Francis and Farrar, Kimberley. 2000. Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English. Journal of Phonetics 28, 161–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, Tim. 2007. Quantifying evidence in forensic authorship analysis. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 14(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, Tim and Baker, Kevin. 2001. Identifying reliable, valid markers of authorship: a response to Chaski. Forensic Linguistics 8(1), 66–79.Google Scholar

Green, Lisa. 2002. African American English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenbaum, Sidney. 1992. A new corpus of English: ICE. In Svartvik, (ed.), 171–83.

Greenbaum, Sidney (ed.). 1996. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Grimmer, Martin. 2007. Britons in early Wessex: the evidence of the Law Code of Ine. In Higham, (ed.), 102–14.

Guilford, J. Paul. 1954. Psychometric Methods, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Guillemin, Bernard and Watson, C.. 2008. Impact of the mobile phone network on the speech signal – some preliminary findings. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 15(2), 193–218.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John and Hymes, Dell (eds.). 1964. The ethnography of communication. American Anthropologist 66(6), part 2.

Gut, Ulrike. 2002. Prosodic aspects of Standard Nigerian English. In Gut, Ulrike and Gibbon, Dafydd (eds.) Typology of African Prosodic Systems, 167–78. Bielefeld University.Google Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. 1980. Variation in the group and the individual: the case of final stop deletion. In Labov, William (ed.) Locating Language in Time and Space, 1–36. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. 1990. The sociolinguistic types of language change. Diachronica 7, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. 2005. Grammar and usage: a variationist response. Language 81, 561–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. and Boberg, Charles. 1997. Inherent variability and the obligatory contour principle. Language Variation and Change 9, 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guy, Gregory R., Feagin, Crawford, Schiffrin, Deborah and Baugh, John (eds.). 1996. Towards a Social Science of Language. Vol. I: Variation and Change in Language and Society. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Guy, Gregory R., Horvath, Barbara M., Vonwiller, Julia, Daisley, Elaine and Rogers, Inge. 1986. An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society 15, 22–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. and Vonwiller, Julia. 1984. The meaning of an intonation in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 4, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hägerstrand, Torsten. 1952. The Propagation of Innovation Waves. Lund Studies in Geography, B: Human Geography, 4. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.Google Scholar

Haddican, William 2010. Theme-goal ditransitives and theme passivisation in British English. Lingual 20, 2424–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haeri, Niloofar. 1996a. The Sociolinguistic Market of Cairo: Gender, Class, and Education. London and New York: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar

Haeri, Niloofar 1996b. ‘Why do women do this?’ Sex and gender differences in speech. In Guy, Feagin, Schiffrin, and Baugh, (eds.), 101–14.

Hale, Mark. 2007. Historical Linguistics: Theory and Method. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hale, Mark and Reiss, Charles. 2008. The Phonological Enterprise. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hale, Sandra. 1997. Clash of world perspectives: the discursive practices of the law, the witness and the interpreter. Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 4(2), 197–209.Google Scholar

Hale, Sandra 1999. Interpreters' treatment of discourse markers in courtroom questions. Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 6(1), 57–82.Google Scholar

Hale, Sandra 2004. The Discourse of Court Interpreting: Discourse Practices of the Law, the Witness and the Interpreter. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hand, David, Mannila, Heikki and Smyth, Padhraic. 2001. Principles of Data Mining. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Harris, John. 1984a. English in the north of Ireland. In Trudgill, (ed.), 115–34.

Harris, John 1984b. Syntactic variation and dialect divergence. Journal of Linguistics 20, 303–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, John 1985. Phonological Variation and Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, John 1994. English Sound Structure. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Haslerud, Vibecke and Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1995. The Bergen Corpus of London Teenage Language. In Leech, Geoffrey, Myers, Greg and Thomas, Jenny (eds.) Spoken English on Computer, 235–42. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Nolan, Aaron and Drager, Katie. 2006. From fush to feesh: exemplar priming in speech perception. Linguistic Review 23, 351–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hay, Jennifer and Drager, Katie. 2007. Sociophonetics. Annual Review of Anthropology 36, 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Measuring dialect pronunciation differences using Levenshtein Distance. Ph.D. thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Available online at www.let.rug.nl/~heeringa/dialectology/thesis/ (last accessed 6 August 2010).Google Scholar

Heeringa, Wilbert, Kleiweg, Peter, Gooskens, Charlotte and Nerbonne, John. 2006. Evaluation of string distance algorithms for dialectology. In Nerbonne, John and Hinrichs, Erhard (eds.) Linguistic Distances Workshop at the Joint Conference of International Committee on Computational Linguistics and the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, July, 2006, 51–62.

Heeringa, Wilbert and Nerbonne, John. 2001. Dialect areas and dialect continua. Language Variation and Change 13, 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heeringa, Wilbert, Nerbonne, John and Kleiweg, Peter. 2002. Validating dialect comparison methods. In Gaul, Wolfgang and Ritter, Gunter (eds.) Classification, Automation, and New Media. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e. V., University of Passau, March 15–17, 2000, 445–52. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Heffer, Chris. 2005. The Language of Jury Trial: A Corpus-aided Analysis of Legal-Lay Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heggarty, Paul. Forthcoming. Measured Language. Publications of the Philological Society, Oxford: Blackwell.

Heggarty, Paul, McMahon, April and McMahon, Robert. 2005. From phonetic similarity to dialect classification: a principled approach. In Delbecque, Nicole, Auwera, Johan and Geeraerts, Dirk (eds.) Perspectives on Variation, 43–91. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, Alison. 1995. Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Henry, Alison 2002. Variation and syntactic theory. In Chambers, , Trudgill, and Schilling-Estes, (eds.), 267–82.

Henton, Caroline and Bladon, Anthony. 1985. Breathiness in a normal female speaker: inefficiency versus desirability. Language and Communication 5, 221–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herold, Ruth. 1997. Solving the actuation problem: merger and immigration in eastern Pennsylvania. Language Variation and Change 9, 165–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heselwood, Barry and McChrystal, Louise. 1999. The effect of age-group and place of L1 acquisition on the realisation of Panjabi stop consonants in Bradford: an acoustic sociophonetic study. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 7, 49–68.Google Scholar

Hibiya, Junko. 1996. Denasalization of the velar nasal in Tokyo Japanese: observations in real time. In Guy, , Feagin, , Schiffrin, and Baugh, (eds.), 161–70.CrossRef

Higham, Nicholas. 1992. Rome, Britain and the Anglo-Saxons. The Archaeology of Change series. London: Seaby.Google Scholar

Higham, Nicholas (ed.). 2007. Britons in Anglo-Saxon England. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.

Hillenbrand, James, Cleveland, Ronald A. and Erickson, Robert L.. 1994. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 769–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hinskens, Franz, Hout, Roeland and Wetzels, Leo. 1997. Variation, Change and Phonological Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,HMSO. 1996. Party Wall etc. Act. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

,HMSO 2001. Special Educational Needs and Disability Act. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

,HMSO 2006. Animal Welfare Act. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Hoenigswald, Henry. 1960. Language Change and Linguistic Reconstruction. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hoenigswald, Henry 1966. A proposal for the study of folk linguistics. In Bright, William (ed.) Sociolinguistics, 16–22. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Hogg, Richard. 1992–2001. The Cambridge History of the English Language (6 volumes). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogg, Richard and Denison, David. 2006. A History of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollien, Harry. 1996. Consideration of guidelines for earwitness lineups. Forensic Linguistics 3(1), 14–23.Google Scholar

Hollien, Harry 1990. The Acoustics of Crime: The New Science of Forensic Phonetics. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollien, Harry 2002. Forensic Voice Identification. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 1982. The functions of tag questions. English Language Research Journal 3, 40–65.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet 1984. Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo 27, 47–62.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet 1996. The New Zealand component of ICE: some methodological challenges. In Greenbaum, (ed.), 163–81.

Holmes, Janet 1998. Women's talk: the question of sociolinguistic universals. In Coates, (ed.), 461–83.

Honeybone, Patrick. 2001. Lenition inhibition in Liverpool English. English Language and Linguistics 5, 213–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honeybone, Patrick 2005. J. R. Firth. In Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (eds.) Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, 80–6. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Honeybone, Patrick 2008. Lenition, weakening and consonantal strength: tracing concepts through the history of phonology. In Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão, Scheer, Tobias and Ségéral, Philippe (eds.) Lenition and Fortition, 9–93. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hooper, Joan. 1976. An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hoppenbrouwers, Cor and Hoppenbrouwers, Geer. 1988. De featurefrequentiemethode en de classificatie van Nederlandse dialecten. TABU: Bulletin voor taalwetenschap 18(2), 51–92.Google Scholar

Hoppenbrouwers, Cor and Hoppenbrouwers, Geer 2001. De indeling van de Nederlandse streektalen. Dialecten van 156 steden en dorpen geklasseerd volgens de FFM. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum B.V.Google Scholar

Horan, Anne. 2002. English grammar in schools. Proceedings of the 2002 conference of the Australian Linguistic Society.

Horvath, Barbara M. 1985. Variation in Australian English: The Sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Howald, Blake S. 2008. Authorship attribution under the rules of evidence: empirical approaches in a layperson's legal system. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 15(2), 219–47.Google Scholar

Howard, David, Hirson, Allen, Brookes, T. and Tyrrell, A. M.. 1995. Spectography of disputed speech samples by peripheral human hearing modelling. Forensic Linguistics 2(1), 28–38.Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2005. A Student's Introduction to English Grammar. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, Amelia I. and Holbrook, Anthony. 1981. A study of reading fundamental frequency of young Black adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hudson, Richard. 1975. The meaning of questions. Language 51, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, Richard 1992. Teaching Grammar: A Guide for the National Curriculum. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard 1997. Inherent variability and linguistic theory. Cognitive Linguistics 8, 73–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, Richard 2007. English dialect syntax in Word Grammar. English Language and Linguistics 11, 383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, Richard and Holmes, Jasper. 1995. Children's Use of Spoken Standard English. A short report prepared for the Schools Curriculum and Assessment Authority. London: SCAA.Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard and Walmsley, John. 2005. The English patient: English grammar and teaching in the twentieth century. Journal of Linguistics 41, 593–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, Arthur, Trudgill, Peter and Watt, Dominic. 2005. English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles, 4th edn. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar

Hundt, Marianne, Nesselhauf, Nadja and Biewer, Carolin (eds.). 2007. Corpus Linguistics and the Web. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.CrossRef

Huson, Daniel and Bryant, David. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(2), 254–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hymes, Dell. 1962. The ethnography of speaking. In Gladwin, Thomas and Sturtevant, William (eds.) Anthropology and Human Behavior, 13–53. Washington, DC: Washington Anthropological Society.Google Scholar

Consortium), IHGSC (International Human Genome Sequencing. 2004. Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature 431, 931–45.Google Scholar

Inoue, Fumio. 1999a. Classification of dialects by image: English and Japanese. In Preston, (ed.), 147–60.CrossRef

Inoue, Fumio 1999b. Subjective dialect division in Great Britain. In Preston, (ed.), 161–76.

Irvine, Judith T. 2001. ‘Style’ as distinctiveness: the culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Eckert, and Rickford, (eds.), 21–43.

Janson, Tore. 1983. Sound change in perception and production. Language 59, 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janson, Tore 1986. Sound change in perception: an experiment. In Ohala, John J. and Jaeger, Jeri J. (eds.) Experimental Phonology, 253–60. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Janson, Tore and Schulman, Richard. 1983. Non-distinctive features and their use. Journal of Linguistics 19, 321–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jessen, Michael. 2008. Forensic phonetics. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(4), 671–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jobling, Mark A., Hurles, Matthew and Tyler-Smith, Chris. 2004. Human Evolutionary Genetics: Origins, Peoples and Disease. Garland Science: Oxford.Google Scholar

Jobling, Mark and Tyler-Smith, Chris. 2003. The human Y chromosome: an evolutionary marker comes of age. Nature Reviews Genetics 4, 598–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey and Goodluck, Helen. 1978. Manual of Information to Accompany the Lancaster-Oslo-Bergen Corpus of British English, for Use with Digital Computers. Oslo: Department of English, Oslo University.Google Scholar

Johnson, Alison. 1997. Textual kidnapping – a case of plagiarism among three student texts?Forensic Linguistics 4(2), 210–25.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 2000. Qualitative Methods in Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara 2007. Linking identity and dialect through stancetaking. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, 49–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara and Kiesling, Scott. 2008. Indexicality and experience: exploring the meanings of /aw/-monothongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12, 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Charles. 1997. The Edinburgh History of the Scots Language. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Steve. 1993. The Language of the Genes. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah and Foreman, Christina. 1996. Boundary tones and focus realization in African-American intonation. Paper presented at the 3rd joint meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the Acoustical Society of Japan, Honolulu, HI, 6 December.

Juvaini, Ata-Malik. 1260. Genghis Khan: The History of the World-Conqueror, trans. Boyle, John A., Manchester University Press/UNESCO, 1997.Google Scholar

Kallen, Jeffrey and Kirk, John. 2007. ICE-Ireland: Local variations on global standards. In Beal, Corrigan and Moisl, (eds.), Vol. I, 121–62.

Karafet, Tatania M., Mendez, Fernando L., Meilerman, Monica B., Underhill, Peter A., Zegura, Stephen L. and Hammer, Michael. 2008. New binary polymorphisms reshape and increase resolution of the human Y chromosomal haplogroup tree. Genome Research 18, 830–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaufman, Leonard and Rousseeuw, Peter. 2005. Finding Groups in Data. An Introduction to Cluster Analysis, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Graeme. 1998. An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents and language change. Language Variation and Change 8, 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerswill, Paul 2003. Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English. In Britain, D. and Cheshire, J. (eds.) Social Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill, 223–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kerswill, Paul 2006. Migration and language. In Ammon, , Dittmar, , Mattheier, and Trudgill, (eds.), 2271–85.

Kerswill, Paul, Llamas, Carmen and Upton, Clive. 1999. The first SuRE moves: early steps towards a large dialect database. In Upton, Clive and Wales, Katie (eds.) Dialectal Variation in English: Proceedings of the Harold Orton Centenary Conference 1998. Leeds Studies in English 30.

Kerswill, Paul and Williams, Ann. 2000. Creating a New Town koine: children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29, 65–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerswill, Paul and Williams, Ann 2002. Dialect recognition and speech community focussing in new and old towns in England: the effects of dialect levelling, demographic and social networks. In Long and Preston (eds.), 173–204.

Kessler, Brett. 1995. Computational dialectology in Irish Gaelic. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 60–7. Dublin: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Kessler, Brett 2005. Phonetic comparison algorithms. Transactions of the Philological Society 103(2), 243–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kimura, Motoo. 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kimura, Motoo and Crow, James F.. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49, 725–38.Google Scholar

King, Kendall A. and Benson, Carol. 2008. Vernacular and indigenous literacies. In Spolsky, and Hult, (eds.), 341–54.

King, Robert D. 1969. Historical Linguistics and Generative Grammar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. How Abstract is Phonology?Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistic Club.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul To appear. Compensatory lengthening. www.stanford.edu/~kiparsky (last accessed 26 July 2010).

Kirk, John. 1992. The Northern Ireland Transcribed Corpus of Speech. In Leitner, Gerhard (ed.) New Directions in Language Corpora, 65–74. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Klemola, Juhani. 2009. Traces of historical infinitive in English dialects and their Celtic connections. English Language and Linguistics 13(2), 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klima, Edward. 1964. Relatedness between grammatical systems. Language 40, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kniffka, Hannes (ed.). 1996. Recent Developments in Forensic Linguistics. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Knowles, Gerald. 1973. Scouse: the urban dialect of Liverpool. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar

Komter, Martha. 2006. From talk to text: the interactional construction of a police record. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(3), 201–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd. 2002. New prospects for the study of English dialect syntax: impetus from syntactic theory and language typology. In Barbiers, , Koeneman, , Lekakou, and Ham, (eds.), 185–213.

Kortmann, Bernd, Schneider, Edgar, Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend and Upton, Clive (eds.). 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool (2 volumes). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd and Upton, Clive (eds.). 2008. Varieties of English 1: The British Isles. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Krämer, Jörg. 1995. Delaunay triangulation in two and three dimensions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar

Kremer, Ludger. 1999 (1984). The Netherlands-German border as a subjective dialect boundary. In Preston, (ed.), 31–6.

Kretzschmar, William A., Anderson, Jean, Beal, Joan C., Corrigan, Karen P., Opas-Hänninen, Lisa Lena and Plichta, Bartlomiej. 2006. Collaboration on corpora for regional and social analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 34, 172–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kretzschmar, William A., Jr., McDavid, Virginia G., Lerud, Theodore K. and Johnson, Ellen (eds.). 1993. Handbook of the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States. University of Chicago Press.

Kroch, Anthony. 1989a. Function and grammar in the history of English: periphrastic ‘do’. In Fasold, and Schiffrin, (eds.), 133–72.CrossRef

Kroch, Anthony 1989b. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3), 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroch, Anthony 2000. Syntactic change. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.). The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 629–739. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruskal, Joseph. 1999. An overview of sequence comparison. In Sankoff, and Kruskal, (eds.), 1–44.

Künzel, Hermann. 2001. Beware of the ‘telephone effect’: the influence of telephone transmission on the measurement of formant frequencies. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 8(1), 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurath, Hans. 1972. Studies in Area Linguistics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Kurath, Hans, Hanley, Miles, Bloch, Bernard and Lowman, Guy S.. 1939–43. The Linguistic Atlas of New England. 3 volumes in 6 parts. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar

Kurath, Hans and Lowman, Guy S., Jr. 1970. The Dialectal Structure of Southern England: Phonological Evidence. Publication of the American Dialect Society 54. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Kurath, Hans and McDavid, Raven I., Jr. 1961. Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Kytö, Merja. 1996. Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts, 3rd edn. Department of English, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar

Kytö, Merja, Rudanko, Juhani and Smitterberg, Erik. 2000. Building a bridge between the present and the past: a corpus of 19th-century English. ICAME Journal 24, 85–97. Available online at http://icame.uib.no/ij24/ (last accessed 4 August 2010).Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19, 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics [2nd edition, 2006, New York: Cambridge University Press].Google Scholar

Labov, William 1969. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45, 715–62.

Labov, William 1972a. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1972b. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1972c. The Design of a Sociolinguistic Research Project. Report of the Sociolinguistics Workshop, Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1975. Empirical foundations of linguistic theory. In Austerlitz, Robert (ed.) The Scope of American Linguistics. The First Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America, 77–133. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1980. The social origins of sound change. In Locating Language in Time and Space, 251–65. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1981. Resolving the neogrammarian controversy. Language 57(2), 267–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William 1984. Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, John and Sherzer, Joel (eds.) Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics, 28–54. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2, 205–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William 1991. The three dialects of English. In Eckert, Penelope (ed.) New Ways of Analyzing Sound Change, 1–44. New York: Academic.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. I: Internal Factors. Language in Society 20. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1996. When intuitions fail. Papers from the 32nd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 32, 76–106.Google Scholar

Labov, William 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. II: Social Factors. Language in Society 20. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. III: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William and Ash, Sharon. 1997. Understanding Birmingham. In Bernstein, Cynthia, Nunnally, Thomas and Sabino, Robin (eds.) Language Variety in the South Revisited, 508–73. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William, Ash, Sharon and Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William and Baker, Bettina. 2003. What is a reading error? www.ling.upenn.edu/~wlabov/Papers/WRE.html] (last accesssed 27 July 2010).

Labov, William and Harris, Wendell A.. 1994. Addressing social issues through linguistic evidence. In Gibbons, (ed.), 265–305.

Labov, William, Karen, Mark and Miller, Corey. 1991. Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast. Language Variation and Change 3, 33–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah and Steiner, Richard. 1972. A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress. Philadelphia: US Regional Survey.Google Scholar

Ladd, F. C. 1970. Black youths view their environment. Environment and Behaviour 2, 74–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar