This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Analysing English SentencesA Minimalist Approach, pp. 486 - 513Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
(1992) Small Clauses in English: The Nonverbal Types, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006) ‘Comparative correlatives and parameters’, ms. University of Essex.
(2003) Successive-Cyclicity, Anti-Locality and Adposition Stranding, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
and (2005) ‘Merge and Move: Wh-dependencies revisited’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 161–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘Wh-subjects in English and the Vacuous Movement Hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 703–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Pied-piping, feature movement and wh-subjects’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 71–93.
(1996) ‘Pied-piping, abstract agreement and functional projections in Tzotzil’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 703–13.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘Multiple nominative constructions in Japanese and Economy’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 671–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1975) An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(1997) Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax, Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998) ‘Parameterizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP checking’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001) ‘The subject-in-situ generalization and the role of case in driving computations’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 193–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (1998) Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002) ‘On linkhood, topicalisation and clitic left dislocation’, Journal of Linguistics 38: 193–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) ‘The categorial status of the small clause: a minimalist approach’, ms. University of Newcastle.
and (2007) ‘A problem for the preposition stranding generalization’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 349–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) ‘A sentential subject asymmetry in English and its implications for complement selection’, Syntax 8: 175–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002) The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1994) ‘Agreement and conjunction in some varieties of Arabic’, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 195–220.Google Scholar
(1989) ‘Arbitrary null objects and unselective binding’, in and (eds.) The Null Subject Parameter, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) ‘V-governed expletives, case theory and the projection principle’, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 721–40.Google Scholar
and (2005) ‘The diverse nature of non-interrogative Wh’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 635–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) ‘Thematic roles and syntactic structures’, in (ed.) Elements of Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 73–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Movement to the higher V is remnant movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 653–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (2001) The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996) ‘More on the Inadequacy of Reanalysis Hypotheses’, Linguistic Inquiry 27: 127–45.Google Scholar
(2000) ‘Clitics: a window into the Null Subject Property’, in (ed.) Portuguese Syntax: Comparative Studies, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 31–93.Google Scholar
(2007) ‘Two kinds of subject pro’, ms. Universidade do Minho.
, and (2005) ‘Null subjects in European and Brasilian Portuguese’, Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4: 11–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Syntactic reconstruction effects’ in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 670–96.CrossRef
(2006) ‘There began to be a learnability puzzle’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 441–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Generalized Verb Movement: Aspects of Verb Syntax, Rosenberg and Sellier, Turin.Google Scholar
and (1988) ‘Psych-verbs and θ-theory’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Licensing configurations: the puzzle of head negative polarity items’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 141–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Topics in the Syntax of Nominal Structures across Romance, PhD dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘The DP hypothesis: identifying clausal properties in the nominal domain’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 536–61.CrossRef
(2000) ‘The rich agreement hypothesis in review’, draft manuscript, McGill University (www.msgill.ca/Linguistics/faculty/bobaljik/).
(2002) ‘A-chains at the PF-interface: copies and “covert” movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 197–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Scope reconstruction and A-movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 503–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006b) ‘Control in Icelandic and theories of control’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) ‘The projection of arguments’, in and (eds.) Functional Projections UMass Occasional Papers 17, GLSA publications, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
(2006) ‘Degree phrase inversion in the scope of negation’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 514–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) ‘More on the difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses’, Journal of Linguistics 28: 139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) ‘Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 629–47.Google Scholar
(2007) ‘On so-called transitive expletives in Belfast English’, unpublished paper, University of Essex.
and (1998) ‘A note on prepositions and case-marking in Polish’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 685–91.Google Scholar
, , and (1996) ‘Long head movement in Breton’, in and (eds.) The Syntax of the Celtic Languages: A Comparative Perspective, Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) ‘On certain violations of the superiority condition, AgrO and economy of derivation’, Journal of Linguistics 33: 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) On the Nature of the Syntax–Phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related Phenomena, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘Topicalization, focalization, lexical insertion and scrambling’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 613–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) ‘On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP’, Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003) ‘On the distribution of null complementisers’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 527–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982) ‘Evaluating competing linguistic models with language acquisition data: implications of developmental errors with causative verbs’, Quaderni di Semantica 3: 5–66.Google Scholar
(1988) ‘The “no negative evidence” problem: How do children avoid an overly general grammar?’, in (ed.) Explaining Language Universals, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 73–101.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Predication’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 299–333.CrossRef
(1971) ‘Three suggestions regarding grammatical analyses of children's language’, in and (eds.) Studies of Child Language Development, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 421–9.Google Scholar
(2005) ‘The phase theoretic basis for subject-aux inversion’, unpublished paper, Memorial University (www.ucs.mun.ca/~branigan/papers)
and (2002) ‘Altruism, Ā-movement and object agreement in Innu-aimûn’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970) ‘On complementizers: toward a syntactic theory of complement types’, Foundations of Language 6: 297–321.Google Scholar
(1972) Theory of Complementation in English Syntax, PhD dissertation, MIT (published as Bresnan 1979).Google Scholar
(1979) Theory of Complementation in English Syntax, Garland, New York (published version of Bresnan 1972).Google Scholar
(1994) ‘Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar’, Language 70: 72–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Extraction from subjects: some remarks on Chomsky's “On Phases”’, in , and (eds.) Organising Grammar, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) ‘Double modals in Hawick Scots’, in and (eds.) Dialects of English, Longman, London, pp. 74–103.Google Scholar
, and (1968) ‘The child's grammar from I to III’, in J. P. Hill (ed.) Minnesota Symposium on Child Developmentvol. II, pp. 28–73.
and (1970) ‘Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech’, in (ed.) Cognition and the Development of Language, Wiley, New York, pp. 11–53.Google Scholar
(2001) Syntax at the Edge: Cross-clausal Phenomena and the Syntax of Passamaquoddy, PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘Two types of wh-scope-marking in Passamaquoddy’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 229–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Differences between the wh-scope-marking and wh-copy constructions in Passamaquoddy’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) ‘Wh-in-situ does not correlate with wh-indefinites or question particles’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 139–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003) ‘Parameterizing passive participle movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (1995) Syntax and Semantics vol. XXVIII: Small Clauses, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
and (1999) ‘The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of the three classes of pronouns’, in (ed.) Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 145–233.Google Scholar
and (1992) ‘The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 173–234.Google Scholar
, and (2005) ‘Structural economy in the processing and representation of gapping sentences’, Syntax 8: 208–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Multiple agreement and case deletion: against φ-(in)completeness’, Syntax 4: 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) ‘Rethinking complementiser agreement: agree with a case-checked goal’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Broaden your views: implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 535–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1955) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, mimeo, MIT (subsequently published as Chomsky 1975).Google Scholar
(1968) Interview with S. Hampshire in The Listener, May 1968.
(1970) ‘Remarks on nominalization’, in and (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham, MA, pp. 184–221.Google Scholar
(1973) ‘Conditions on transformations’, in and (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 232–86.Google Scholar
(1975) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, Plenum Press, New York (published version of Chomsky 1955).Google Scholar
(1977) ‘On Wh-movement’, in Culicover et al. 1977, pp. 71–132.
(1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(1989) ‘Some notes on economy of derivation and representation’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 43–74 (reprinted as chapter 2 of Chomsky 1995).Google Scholar
(1993) ‘A minimalist program for linguistic theory’, in Hale and Keyser 1993, pp. 1–52 (reprinted as chapter 3 of Chomsky 1995).
(1998) Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15 (also published in , and (eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., pp. 89–155).Google Scholar
(1999) Derivation by Phase, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18 (also published in (ed.) (2001) Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52).Google Scholar
(2001) Beyond Explanatory Adequacy, unpublished manuscript, MIT. (A published version appeared in (ed.) (2004) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. III, Oxford University Press, pp. 104–31).Google Scholar
(2005b) ‘On phases’, unpublished paper, MIT (to appear in , and (eds.) Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
(2006) ‘Approaching UG from below’, unpublished paper, MIT.
and (1993) ‘The theory of principles and parameters’, in , , and (eds.) Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 506–69 (reprinted in Chomsky 1995, pp. 13–127).Google Scholar
(1994) ‘Evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP’, in , , , and (eds.) Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard Kayne, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
(2002) Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. I, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘“Restructuring” and functional structure’, in (ed.) The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. III Structures and Beyond, Oxford University Press, pp. 132–91.Google Scholar
(2005) ‘Deriving Greenberg's universal 20 and its exceptions’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 315–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) ‘On the nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge and Parallel Merge’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 475–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘The interaction between across-the-board wh-movement and left branch extraction’, Syntax 9: 225–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008) ‘Chomskyan Syntactic theory and language disorder’, in , , and (eds.) The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 165–83.Google Scholar
, and (2006) ‘Amnestying superiority violations: processing multiple questions’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 51–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1998) ‘The typology of wh-movement: Wh-questions in Malay’, Syntax 1: 221–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000) ‘Partial wh-movement: evidence from Malay’, in Lutz, Müller and van Stechow 2000, pp. 101–30.CrossRef
(2005b) ‘A smuggling approach to raising in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997) ‘Quotative Inversion’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1993) ‘Object shift in double object constructions and the theory of Case’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19: 131–74.Google Scholar
(1986) ‘Spanish bare NPs and the ECP’, in , and (eds.) Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 25–49.Google Scholar
(1987) ‘Small clauses in Spanish and English’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5: 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000a) ‘Head Movement and negation in English’, Transactions of the Philological Society 98: 49–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000b) ‘Fronting: the syntax and pragmatics of “focus” and “topic”’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 20: 387–417.Google Scholar
(1999) ‘Quirky but not eccentric: dative subjects in Spanish’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 34: 213–27.Google Scholar
(1991) ‘Topicalization, inversion and complementiser in English’, in , , and (eds.) OTS Working Papers: Going Romance and Beyond, University of Utrecht, pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
and (2001) ‘Stylistic inversion in English: a reconsideration’, Natural Language and Linguisitc Theory 19: 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003) Dynamical Grammar: Minimalism, Acquisition and Change, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2004) ‘Null objects in French and English’, in , and (eds.) Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 121–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977) Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern Day “Wild Child”, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
and (2004) The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation, Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Single-pair versus multiple-pair answers: Wh-in-situ and scope’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 512–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Appositives at the Interface, PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Pluringulars, pronouns and quirky agreement’, The Linguistic Review 18: 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002) ‘From hell to polarity: “aggressively non-D-linked” wh-phrases as polarity items’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘Optional wh-movement in Babine-Witsuwit'en’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 199–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘Parallel (a)symmetries and the internal structure of negative expressions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 253–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘The syntax of appositive relativization: on specifying co-ordination, false free relatives and promotion’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 229–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘On wh-head movement’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 21–46.
(2003) ‘Toward a typology of focus and focus constructions’, Linguistics 41: 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘On the structure of resultative participles in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 355–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) ‘Two principles of economy’, in , , , and (eds.) Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard Kayne, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp. 155–72.Google Scholar
(2005) ‘Biology and language: a consideration of alternatives’, Journal of Linguistics 41: 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Biology and language: response to Anderson & Lightfoot’, Journal of Linguistics 42: 385–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990) ‘The difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive clauses’, Journal of Linguistics 26: 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Against remnant VP-movement’, in , , and (eds.) Dimensions of Movement: From Features to Remnants, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 91–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002) ‘Distributed deletion’, in (ed.) Theoretical Approaches to Universals, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990) ‘Null objects in Brazilian Portuguese’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980) ‘The relation between black and white speech in the south’, ms., School of Languages and Linguistics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
(1978) ‘Implication reversal in a natural language’, in and (eds.) Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999a) Verbal Complement Clauses: A Minimalist Study of Direct Perception Constructions, Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999b) ‘Perception and control: a Minimalist analysis of English direct perception complements’, Journal of Linguistics 34: 351–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001) ‘Expletives as arguments: Germanic existential sentences revisited’, Linguistische Berichte 187: 289–324.Google Scholar
(1968) ‘The case for case’, in and (eds.) Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 1–88.Google Scholar
(1972) ‘Subjects, speakers and roles’, in and (eds.) Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
, and (2005) ‘The evolution of the language faculty: clarification and implications’, Cognition 97: 179–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘Remarks on the de-grammaticalization of infinitival to in present-day American English’, in , and (eds.) Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 171–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Setting syntactic parameters’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 730–67.CrossRef
and (2002) ‘Understanding stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 105–45.Google Scholar
and (2005) ‘The subset principle in syntax: costs of compliance’, Journal of Linguistics 41: 513–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007) ‘Causation, obligation and Argument Structure: on the nature of little v’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 197–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003) ‘Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: the difference between sluicing and VP ellipsis’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004) ‘Condition A and scope reconstruction’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 475–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) ‘Optimality theory and clitics at PF’, Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 7: 101–16.Google Scholar
and (2006) ‘Case and word order in Lithuanian’, Journal of Linguistics 42: 239–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1994) ‘On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics’, Indiana Linguistic Studies 7: 69–78.Google Scholar
and (2005) ‘The syntax–discourse divide: processing ellipsis’, Syntax 8: 121–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2001) ‘Exquisite connections: some remarks on the evolution of linguistic theory’, Lingua 111: 639–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985) ‘Variable in Palauan syntax’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 59–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Syntactic Variables: Resumptive Pronouns and A'-binding in Palauan, Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) ‘Associative adjectives in English and the lexicon–syntax interface’, Journal of Linguistics 41: 571–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) ‘On the nature of long-distance anaphors’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) ‘The categorial status of quantifier nominals’, Linguistische Berichte 136: 438–52.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘The categorial status of determiners’, in (ed.) The New Comparative Syntax, Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–113.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘Theta-alignment and the by-phrase’, Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 33: 129–39.Google Scholar
(1998) ‘Semantic and syntactic patterns in African American English’, ms. University of Massachusetts.
(1975) ‘Logic and conversation’, in and (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘Minimal projection, heads, and optimality’, draft manuscript, Rutgers University.
and (1996) ‘Spell-out at the LF interface’, in , , and (eds.) Minimal Ideas, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 113–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) ‘Understood arguments: a semantic/pragmatic approach’, Lingua 96: 139–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Prolific Peripheries: A Radical View from the Left, PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
(2003b) ‘Successive cyclicity under (anti-) local considerations’, Syntax 6: 260–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Top issues in questions: topics – topicalization – topicalizability’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 249–88.
, and (2000) ‘No more EPP’, Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 19: 153–66.Google Scholar
& (2002) ‘Resuming reflexives’, Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference in Linguistics, Tromsø, Norway.Google Scholar
and (2006) ‘Reply to Bhatt and Pancheva's “Late merger of degree clauses”: the irrelevance of (non)conservativity’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 457–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005) ‘The structure of children's linguistic knowledge’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 463–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
, and (1992) ‘Spec of IP and spec of VP: two subjects in Austronesian languages’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 375–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) ‘The structural deficiency of verbal pro-forms’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 539–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) ‘Categorial features as the source of EPP and abstract Case phenomena’, in and (eds.) New Perspectives on Case Theory, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp. 89–126.Google Scholar
(1986) ‘The present subjunctive in contemporary British English’, Studia Anglica Posnaniensa 19: 61–74.Google Scholar
(1990) ‘Non-overt subjects in diary contexts’, in and (eds.) Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study of West Flemish, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) ‘Inversion, non-adjacent inversion and adjuncts in CP’, in Transactions of the Philological Society98: 121–60.
(2006) ‘Clitic climbing and the dual status of sembrare’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 484–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991) On the Syntax of Argument Structure, Lexicon Project Working Papers, MIT, Center for Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
and (1993a) ‘On argument structure and the lexical expression of semantic relations’, in Hale and Keyser 1993b, pp. 53–109.
and (1994) ‘Constraints on argument structure’, in , and (eds.) Heads, Projections and Learnability, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, vol. I, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar
and (1993) ‘Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection’, in Hale and Keyser 1993b, pp. 111–76.
(2004) ‘There as an existential operator’, Language Research 40: 451–464 (published by Language Research Institute, Seoul National University).Google Scholar
(1993) Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Form, Meaning and Processing, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
(2003) ‘Possession and the double object construction’, in and (eds.) Yearbook of Linguistic Variation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 29–62.Google Scholar
, and (2002) ‘The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004a) ‘Long-distance agreement and the syntax of for-to infinitives’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 338–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b) ‘The syntax of existential constructions’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 393–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter-Setting, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2007), ‘A new approach to transitive expletives: evidence from Belfast English’, English Language and Linguistics 11: 279–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006) ‘Definite and non-definite superlatives and NPI licensing’, Syntax 9: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986) ‘Some aspects of wh-questions in Frisian’, North-Western European Language Evolution (NOWELE) 8: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Multiple agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 40: 67–80.Google Scholar
(2005) Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture, PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
(2003) ‘Children's judgments on negative questions’, Language Acquisition 11: 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) ‘The Yiddish double verb construction’, Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 2: 85–97.Google Scholar
(2000a) ‘Am I unscientific? A reply to Lappin, Levine and Johnson’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 837–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) ‘Scandinavian stylistic fronting: how any category can become an expletive’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 445–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) ‘Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 533–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Aspects of the Syntax of Questions in English and Korean, PhD dissertation, University of Essex.Google Scholar
(2007) ‘A very short note on existential constructions’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 410–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984) ‘On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns’, Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–74.Google Scholar
(1991) ‘Remarks on the status of the null object’, in (ed.) Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 56–76.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘Reconstruction and the structure of VP: some theoretical consequences’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 103–38.Google Scholar
(1994) ‘The contrast between interrogatives and questions’, Journal of Linguistics 30: 411–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) ‘The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition’, Cognition 40: 159–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1992) ‘A reanalysis of null subjects in child language’, in , and (eds.) Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition, Erlbaum, London, pp. 249–67.Google Scholar
(2000) ‘Negation and OV order in Late Middle English’, Journal of Linguistics 36: 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Negated subjects and objects in 15th century non-literary English’, Language Variation and Change 14: 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) ‘A structural constraint on negation in Late Middle and Early Modern English’, in and (eds.) Medieval English Mirror 3: To Make his Englissh Sweete upon his Tonge, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
(2006) ‘In defense of a quantificational account of definite DPs’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 275–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006a) ‘On the relaxation of intervention effects’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 217–46.
(2006b) ‘A uniform/nonuniform analysis of overt wh-movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977b) ‘Constraints on phrase structure rules’, in Culicover et al. 1977, pp. 249–83.
(1937) Analytic Syntax, George Allen and Unwin, London (reprinted in 1969 by Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).Google Scholar
(2000a) ‘The interpretation of tense and aspect in argument small clauses’, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 40: 279–98.Google Scholar
(2000b) ‘The aspectual morpheme as and feature movement in argument small clauses’, Generative Linguistics in Poland 1: 59–69.Google Scholar
(2000) ‘Few dogs like Whiskas or cats Alpo’, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 23: 59–82.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘What VP-ellipsis can do, and what it can't, but not why’, in and (eds.) The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 439–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Restoring exotic co-ordinations to normalcy’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 97–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) ‘Small clauses and the projection principle’, Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) ‘Strong pronouns and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter’, Probus 11: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘The partial pro-drop nature and the restricted VS order in Brazilian Portuguese’, in and (eds.) The Null Subject Parameter in Brazilian Portuguese, Vervuert-IberoAmericana, Madrid, pp. 223–58.Google Scholar
(1989) ‘Facets of Romance past participle agreement’, in (ed.) Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 85–103.Google Scholar
(2005) ‘Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French’, in Cinque and Kayne 2005, pp. 3–69.
and (1978) ‘Stylistic inversion, successive cyclicity, and Move NP in French’, Linguistic Inquiry 9: 595–621.Google Scholar
(1999) Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison, Garland, New York.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘Comparative deletion and optimality in syntax’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 553–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) ‘Ellipsis and syntactic representation’, in and (eds.) The Syntax–Semantics Interface: Interpreting (Omitted) Structure, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
and (2000), ‘Attributive comparative deletion’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 89–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1970) ‘Fact’, in and (eds.) Programs in Linguistics: A Collection of Papers, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
(2000) ‘Indefinite pronouns and overt N-raising’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 557–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘On the existence of null complementisers in syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 339–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘The EPP in a topic-prominent language’, in (ed.) Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, Oxford University Press, pp. 107–24.Google Scholar
(1986) Subjects in English and Japanese, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
(1964) ‘Negation in English’, in and (eds.) The Structure of Language, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 246–323.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 99–148.Google Scholar
(1984) The Syntax of Verbs: From Verb Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
(2005) ‘Korean (and Japanese) morphology from a syntactic perspective’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 601–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Unmasking covert complementiser agreement’, unpublished paper presented at LSA conference, Boston, MA, January 2004.
(1978) ‘Why subject sentences don't exist’, in (ed.) Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 53–64.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘On external arguments’, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: 103–30.Google Scholar
(1995) ‘Stage-level and individual-level predicates’, in and (eds.) The Generic Book, Chicago University Press, pp. 125–75.Google Scholar
(1996) ‘Severing the external argument from its verb’, in and (eds.) Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 109–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Syntactic Change’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 699–729.CrossRef
(1969) ‘Contraction, deletion and the inherent variability of the English copula’, Language 45: 715–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979) Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
(1998) ‘Focus and negative polarity in Hindi’, Natural Language Semantics 6: 57–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections, PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Control and extraposition: the case of Super-Equi’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 109–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘The scale of finiteness and the calculus of Control’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 811–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000a) ‘Topic…Comment: the structure of unscientific revolutions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 665–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000b) ‘The revolution confused: a response to our critics’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 873–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001) ‘The revolution maximally confused’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 901–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007), ‘Machine learning theory and practice as a source of insight into universal grammar’, Journal of Linguistics 43: 393–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990) ‘Double objects revisited: reply to Jackendoff’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 589–632.Google Scholar
and (1991) ‘Predicate cleft in Haitian Creole’, North Eastern Linguistics Society 21: 247–61.Google Scholar
and (2004) ‘On indefinite pronoun structures with APs: reply to Kishimoto’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 268–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) ‘Case and expletives: notes toward a parametric account’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 381–405.Google Scholar
(1995a) ‘Verbal Morphology: Syntactic Structures meets the Minimalist Program’, in and (eds.) Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory, Georgetown University Press, pp. 251–75.Google Scholar
(1995b) ‘Case and expletives revisited: on greed and other human failings’, Linguistic Inquiry 26: 615–33.Google Scholar
(1998) ‘Some reconstruction riddles’, in Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 83–98, Penn Linguistics Circle, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
(1999) ‘Chains of arguments’, in and (eds.) Working Minimalism, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 189–215.Google Scholar
(2000) Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (with M. Depiante and A. Stepanov).Google Scholar
(2006) ‘Conceptions of the cycle’, in Cheng & Corver 2006: 197–216.
(1991) ‘Relative clauses, licensing and the nature of derivation’, in (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure, Academic Press, New York, pp. 209–39.Google Scholar
(1995) ‘Where does Binding Theory apply?’, University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 63–88.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Reduced and phrasal comparatives’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 683–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Ditransitive Structures and (Anti)locality, PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
and (2002) ‘Empirical re-assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 151–62.Google Scholar
and (1995) Unaccusativity at the Syntax–Lexical Semantic Interface, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
and (2002) ‘Learnability and the statistical study of language: poverty of stimulus arguments revisited’, in , and (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp. 359–70.Google Scholar
(1976) ‘The theoretical implications of Subject Raising’, Foundations of Language 14: 257–86.Google Scholar
(1999) The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
(1987) ‘Negative polarity and grammatical representation’, Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 325–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1989) ‘Q as a functional category’, in , and (eds.) Syntactic Phrase Structure Phenomena, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
(1996) ‘The syntax of N-raising: a minimalist theory’, OTS Working Papers 5, Research Institute for Language and Speech, Utrecht.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘The structure of DPs: some principles, parameters and problems’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 562–603.CrossRef
(2007) The English Left Periphery in Linearisation-based HPSG, PhD dissertation, University of Essex.Google Scholar
(1994) ‘Active passives’, Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 23: 286–301.Google Scholar
and (2000) ‘A minimalist approach to A-movement and control’, Lingua 110: 409–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1987) ‘Parameters, binding theory and learnability’, Linguistic Inquiry 18: 413–44.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘Negative evidence in language acquisition’, Cognition 46: 53–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1996) A Minimalist Theory of PRO and Control, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Null case and the distribution of PRO’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 141–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) ‘Two types of quirky subjects: Spanish versus Icelandic’, Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society 23: 303–17.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘Gapping with shared operators’, Berkeley Linguistics Society 19: 245–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) ‘Subjecthood and subject positions’, in (ed.) Elements of Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘Quantifier Float and Wh-Movement in an Irish English’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘The morphosyntax of WH-extraction in Irish’, Journal of Linguistics 37: 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations’, in and (eds.) Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 184–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989) ‘Partial and multiple wh-movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 565–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) ‘Variation in the phrase structure of applicatives’, Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1: 105–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (2005) Perspectives on phases, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49.
(1992) ‘VP-coordination and the VP-internal subject hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 336–41.Google Scholar
(1966) ‘Developmental Psycholinguistics’, in and (eds.) The Genesis of Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 15–84.Google Scholar
(2000) Infinitive Constructions with Specified Subjects: A Syntactic Analysis of the Romance Languages, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands and Identity in Ellipsis, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1974) Existential Sentences in English, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
(1977) ‘Peculiarities of the existential construction in English’, Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
(2006) ‘Moving to the edge’, Proceedings of the 2006 KALS-KASELL International Conference on English and Linguistics, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
and (2004) ‘Argument structure and ditransitive verbs in Japanese’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000) ‘What does it take to be a dative subject?’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (1989) ‘Limits on negative information in language input’, Journal of Child Language 16: 531–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1993) ‘Improper movement and unambiguous binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 461–507.
(1993) Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Co-ordinate Structures, PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Verbs in locative constructions and the generative lexicon’, The Linguistic Review 18: 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005) ‘Pro Drop and Pronouns’, in et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp. 299–307.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘Against a parameter-setting approach to language variation’, Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 4: 181–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) ‘On split CPs, uninterpretable features and the “perfectness” of language’, Zentrum für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Papers in Linguistics 35: 399–422.Google Scholar
(2006) ‘A rejoinder to “On the role of parameters in Universal Grammar: a reply to Newmeyer” by Ian Roberts and Anders Holmberg’, ms. University of Washington.
(1995) Heavy Pied-Piping in Nweh, PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
and (2004) ‘Tense beyond the verb: encoding clausal tense/aspect/mood on nominal dependents’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 597–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) ‘Linearization of chains and phonetic realisation of chain links’, in and (eds.) Working Minimalism, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 217–49.Google Scholar
(1999) ‘Multiple spell-out and PF-adjacency’, Proceedings of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society 29: 293–306.Google Scholar
(1995) ‘Out of control’, Proceedings of the North-Eastern Linguistics Society 25: 361–71.Google Scholar
(1990) ‘Sentential negation, relativized minimality and the aspectual status of auxiliaries’, The Linguistic Review 7: 183–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Reflexives and resultatives: some differences between English and German’, Linguistics 40: 961–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) ‘On the behaviour of definite articles in Chamicuro’, Language 75: 552–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970) ‘The two verbs begin’, in and (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham, MA, pp. 107–19.Google Scholar
(1982) ‘Complementiser-trace phenomena and the Nominative Island Condition’, The Linguistic Review 1: 297–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987) ‘Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding’, in and (eds.) The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 98–129.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘Optimality Theory and syntax: movement and pronunciation’, in and (eds.) Optimality Theory: An Overview, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 134–70.Google Scholar
(1998) ‘Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation’, in , , , and (eds.) Is the Best Good Enough?MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 337–83.Google Scholar
and (2001) ‘T-to-C movement: causes and consequences’, in (ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 355–426.Google Scholar
and (2007) ‘The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features’, in , and (eds.) Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 262–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘The metric of open-mindedness’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18: 859–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1989) ‘The role of AGR and finiteness’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 44: 101–17.Google Scholar
and (2004) ‘Topic, focus and V2: defining the CP sublayers’, in (ed.) The Structure of IP and CP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. II, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2001) ‘Long-distance agreement and Topic in Tsez’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 583–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989) ‘Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
(1966) ‘On so-called pronouns in English’, in (ed.) Nineteenth Monograph on Language and Linguistics, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC (reprinted in D. Reibel and S. Schane (eds.) (1969) Modern Studies in English, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 201–24).Google Scholar
(1974) On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
and (1978) ‘Traces and the description of English complementiser contraction’, Linguistic Inquiry 9: 1–29.Google Scholar
and (1988) ‘Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 635–70.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘The syntax and semantics of as-parentheticals’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 623–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Small utterances and small clauses: the syntax’, ms. Wayne State University.
and (2002) ‘Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 9–50.Google Scholar
and (2005) ‘Phase edge and extraction: a Tagalog case study’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 565–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) ‘The acquisition of the morphosyntax of finite verbs in English’, in (ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 23–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) ‘Head-hunting: on the trail of the nominal Janus’, in , and (eds.) Heads in Grammatical Theory, Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997a) Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English, Cambridge University Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997b) Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction, Cambridge University Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004a) Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) ‘Split projections, percolation, syncretism and interrogative auxiliary inversion’, Research Reports in Linguistics 53: 157–91, University of Essex.Google Scholar
and (2007) ‘On past participle agreement in transitive clauses in French’, paper presented to XXXIII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, available at: http://amsacta.cib.unibo.it/archive/00002397/01/PROCEEDINGS_IGG33.pdf
(1996) ‘Two subject positions in Scottish Gaelic: the syntax–semantics interface’, Natural Language Semantics 4: 165–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986) ‘On the null object in European Portuguese’, in and (eds.) Studies in Romance Linguistics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 373–90.Google Scholar
(1998) ‘Wh-in-situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program’, Natural Language Semantics 6: 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002) ‘Movement, wh-agreement and apparent wh-in-situ’, paper presented to Workshop on Wh-Movement, University of Leiden, December 2002.Google Scholar
, and (2006) ‘Movement, wh-agreement and apparent wh-in-situ’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 165–94.
(2000) ‘Revolution, discovery and an elementary principle of logic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 843–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001b) ‘Confusion compounded’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 879–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001) ‘Deconstructing binding’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 634–70.CrossRef
(2006) ‘The interaction of Th/Ex and locative inversion’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 685–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) ‘On feature inheritance: an argument from the phase impenetrability condition’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 563–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) What Moves Where When in Which Language?PhD dissertation, MIT. (A published version appeared as Richards 2001.)Google Scholar
(1991) ‘Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew’, in (ed.) Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, Academic Press, New York, pp. 37–62.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘Spanish quirky subjects, person restrictions, and the person-case constraint’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986) ‘Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–57.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, in (ed.) Elements of Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 281–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘Remarks on early null subjects’, in and (eds.) The Acquisition of Syntax, Longman, London, pp. 269–92.
(2001a) ‘Relativized minimality effects’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 89–110.
(2001b) ‘On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause’, in and (eds.) Current Issues in Italian Syntax, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 287–96.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘Locality and left periphery’, in (ed.) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. III, Oxford University Press, pp. 223–51.Google Scholar
(2006) ‘On the form of chains: criterial positions and ECP effects’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 97–133.
and (2005) ‘Strategies of subject extraction’, ms., Universities of Siena and Geneva.
(1985) ‘Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 3: 21–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987) The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects, Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) ‘Have/Be raising, Move F and Procrastinate’, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 113–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) ‘Two types of head movement in Romance’, in Lightfoot & Hornstein 1994, pp. 207–42.CrossRef
(2000) ‘Caricaturing dissent’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 849–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a) ‘Who has confused what? More on Lappin, Levine and Johnson’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 887–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001b) ‘Head Movement’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 113–47.
and (2006) ‘On the role of parameters in Universal Grammar: a reply to Newmeyer’, ms. University of Cambridge.
and (2002) ‘The Extended Projection Principle as a condition on the tense dependency’, in. (ed.) Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, Oxford University Press, pp. 125–55.Google Scholar
(1999) Morphology-Driven Syntax: A Theory of V-to-I Raising and Pro-drop, Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) ‘The correlation between scope reconstruction and connectivity effects’, in , and (eds.) Proceedings of the XVI West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics, CLSI, Stanford, CA, pp. 351–65.Google Scholar
(1965) The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, PhD dissertation, MIT (published as Rosenbaum 1967).Google Scholar
(1967) The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘A syntactic device in the service of semantics’, Studia Linguistica 56: 145–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967) Constraints on Variables in Syntax, PhD dissertation, MIT (published as Infinite Syntax! by Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, 1986).Google Scholar
(1969) ‘Guess who’, in , , and (eds.) Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago, pp. 252–86.Google Scholar
(1970) ‘On declarative sentences’, in and (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham, MA, pp. 222–72.Google Scholar
(1988) ‘On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 445–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Lingering challenges to the raising-to-object and object-control constructions’, Syntax 9: 193–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) The Syntax of Imperatives in English and Germanic: Word Order Variation in the Minimalist Framework, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘A minimalist analysis of syntactic islands’, The Linguistic Review 19: 271–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) ‘Wh scope mechanisms in Bahasa Indonesia’, in L. Cheng and H. Demirdache (eds.) MIT Working Papers in Linguistics15: 183–218.
and (1994) ‘Prenominal adjectives and the phrasal/lexical distinction’, Journal of Linguistics 30: 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984) ‘Missing subjects in German’, in (ed.) Studies in German Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 193–230.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘Perception, selection and structural economy’, Natural Language Semantics 2: 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) ‘English relative clause constructions’, Journal of Linguistics 33: 431–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The Language Instinct Debate, Continuum International Publishing Group, London.Google Scholar
and (2002) ‘Total reconstruction, PF movement and derivational order’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 283–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Studies in English and Japanese Auxiliaries: A Multi-stratal Approach, Hituzi Syobo, Tokyo.Google Scholar
and (2002) ‘Searching for arguments to support linguistic nativism’, The Linguistic Review 19: 185–223.Google Scholar
(1999) ‘English expletive constructions are not infected’, Linguistic Inquiry 30: 467–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Synchronic and diachronic microvariation in English do’, Lingua 114: 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) ‘On the syntax of either…or’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 339–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases’, Syntax 9: 67–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000) ‘The wh+that pattern in present-day English’, in (ed.) Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 161–75.Google Scholar
(1991) ‘Quantifiers as functional heads: a study of quantifier float in Hebrew’, Lingua 84: 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) ‘Icelandic case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 327–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) ‘Icelandic finite verb agreement’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57: 1–46.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘To be an oblique subject: Russian vs. Icelandic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 691–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘The nominative puzzle and the Low Nominative Hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002) ‘Indeterminacy, inference, iconicity and interpretation: aspects of the grammar–pragmatics interface’, in (ed.) Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp. 38–53.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘Agreement, default rules and grammatical viruses’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 318–43.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘The Comp-trace effect, the adverb effect, and minimal CP’, Journal of Linguistics 38: 527–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Expletive constructions are not “lower right corner” movement constructions’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 503–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs’, Language 76: 859–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Reconceptualising the English Determiner Class, PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
(1988) ‘A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–49.Google Scholar
(1998) ‘Movement, agreement and case’, in Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure, Routledge, London, pp. 88–243.Google Scholar
, and (1973) The Major Syntactic Structures of English, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
(1991) ‘Small clause restructuring’, in (ed.) Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 182–218.Google Scholar
(1984) ‘Controlled pro’, in (ed.) Papers from the XIIth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, University Park Press, Baltimore, pp. 254–73.Google Scholar
(2000) ‘The syntax of direct quotes with special reference to Spanish and English’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 525–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Mechanisms of wh-saturation and interpretation in multiple wh-movement’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 288–318.
(2002a) ‘Case is uninterpretable aspect’, www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius/paperspage.html
(2002b) ‘Icelandic case and the structure of events’, www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius/paperspage.html
(2004) ‘On the edge’, in , and (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 261–87.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘Case assignment and the order of functional projections in Welsh’, in (ed.), Eurotyp Working Papers, Programme in Language Typology, European Science Foundation, Berlin, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
(2007) The Role of Lexical Acquisition in Simultaneous Bilingualism, PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
(1990) ‘D-projections and N-projections in Norwegian’, in and (eds.) Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 419–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Review of Radford (1997a/b), Natural Language Engineering 7/1.
(2002) ‘Development of the concept of “the poverty of stimulus”’, The Linguistic Review 19: 51–71.Google Scholar
(1995) ‘Referentiality and wh-movement in child English: juvenile D-linkuency’, Language Acquisition 4: 139–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) ‘The origins and development of periphrastic auxiliary do: a case of destigmatisation’, Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 3: 1–30.Google Scholar
(1984) ‘On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects’, Linguistic Inquiry 15: 103–29.Google Scholar
(1972) A History of English Syntax: A Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
(2000) The syntax of subjunctive complements: Evidence from Japanese, unpublished dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘On feature-checking for wh-traces’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 243–80.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Local economy and generalized pied-piping’, The Linguistic Review 18: 169–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘On the emptiness of “design” polemics’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18: 863–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Cutting derivational options’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999) ‘Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 613–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘NP-internal agreement and the structure of the noun phrase’, Journal of Linguistics 42: 139–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989) ‘Movement and regeneration’, in (ed.) Dialectal Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 105–36.Google Scholar
(1995) Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in Germanic Languages, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) ‘NPI licensing, Strawson entailment and context dependency’, Journal of Semantics 16: 97–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Wh-in-situ languages’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 203–25.CrossRef
(2004) ‘The genesis of Negative Concord: syntax and morphology of Negative Doubling’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 559–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘The pied-piper feature’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 47–70.
(1994) ‘Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations’, in Lightfoot & Hornstein 1994, pp. 305–50.
(1998) ‘Very early parameter-setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage’, Lingua 106: 23–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘The subject-predicate theory of there’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 648–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘On the distribution of resumptive pronouns and wh-trace in Welsh’, Journal of Linguistics 36: 531–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) ‘On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 143–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘The syntax of pronouns: evidence from Halkomelem Salish’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 157–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1971) ‘Black–white speech differences revisited’, in and (eds.), Black–White Speech Relationships, Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC, pp. 139–61.Google Scholar
(1991) ‘VP-internal subjects in VSO and nonconfigurational languages’, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 503–40.Google Scholar
(2006) ‘Lexical case, inherent case and argument structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) ‘Choice between the overt and the covert’, Transactions of the Philological Society 101: 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘On overt and covert wh- and relative movement in Hindi and Punjabi’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 135–64.
(1991) Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
(1997) The Structure of the Serbian Noun Phrase, PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
(1995) Co-ordination: The Syntax of &P, PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘I wonder what kind of construction that this kind of example illustrates’, in , , and (eds.) The Construction of Meaning, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 219–48.Google Scholar