Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Preface to the second edition
- 1 The situation and tasks of the philosophy of art
- 2 Representation, imitation, and resemblance
- 3 Beauty and form
- 4 Expression
- 5 Originality and imagination
- 6 Understanding art
- 7 Identifying and evaluating art
- 8 Art and emotion
- 9 Art and morality
- 10 Art and society: some contemporary practices of art
- 11 Epilogue: the evidence of things not seen
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
8 - Art and emotion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Preface to the second edition
- 1 The situation and tasks of the philosophy of art
- 2 Representation, imitation, and resemblance
- 3 Beauty and form
- 4 Expression
- 5 Originality and imagination
- 6 Understanding art
- 7 Identifying and evaluating art
- 8 Art and emotion
- 9 Art and morality
- 10 Art and society: some contemporary practices of art
- 11 Epilogue: the evidence of things not seen
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art , pp. 200 - 224Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
, “How can We be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary vol. 49 (1975), pp. 67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “On What There Is,” in , From a Logical Point of View, revised edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1961), pp. 1–19Google Scholar
, “Philosophy as/and/of Literature,” Grand Street 3, 3 (spring 1984), pp. 151–76 at p. 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Of Tragedy,” in , Essays Moral, Political and Literary (Oxford University Press, 1963), pp. 221–30 at p. 221Google Scholar
, “‘An Unaccountable Pleasure’: Hume on Tragedy and the Passions,” Hume Studies 24, 2 (November 1998), pp. 335–54Google Scholar
, “Hume’s ‘Singular Phenomenon,’” British Journal of Aesthetics 39, 2 (April 1999), pp. 112–25 at p. 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Fear, Fiction, and Make-Believe,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49, 1 (winter 1991), pp. 47–56 at pp. 49B–50ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Music and Negative Emotion,” in Music and Meaning, ed. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997), pp. 215–41 at p. 217Google Scholar
develops a similar simulationist view in “The Moral Psychology of Fiction,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (1995), pp. 250–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research,” Ethics 110, 2 (January 2000), pp. 350–87 at p. 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Capacities that Enable Us to Produce and Consume Art,” in Imagination, Philosophy, and the Arts, eds. and (London: Routledge, 2003), pp. 293–304 at pp. 296, 297Google Scholar
, “How Can We Fear and Pity Fictions?,” British Journal of Aesthetics 21, 4 (April 1981), pp. 291–304 at p. 292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Philosophy of Horror, Or, Paradoxes of the Heart (London: Routledge, 1990), pp. 29, 89Google Scholar
, “Art and Emotion,” in The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, ed. (Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 421–35 at p. 428Google Scholar
, “What Writers Do: The Value of Literary Imagination,” Journal of Literary Theory 3, 1 (2009), pp. 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Identifying with Metaphor: Metaphors of Personal Identification,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57, 4 (fall 1999), pp. 399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Thinking of Others: On the Talent for Metaphor (Princeton University Press, 2008), p. 13Google Scholar
, “In Fictional Shoes: Mental Simulation in Fiction,” in Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures, ed. and (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 271–80 at p. 278Google Scholar
, Rhetoric, trans. , in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. (New York: Random House, 1941), pp. 1325–451Google Scholar
, “Anthony Caro’s Table Sculptures, 1966–77,” in , Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews (University of Chicago Press, 1998), pp. 202–09Google Scholar
, “Art as Dramatization,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59, 4 (fall 2001), pp, 363–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtak provides a nice account of sentimentality as a form of evasiveness and a failure to engage with reality in “Poetics of Sentimentality,” Philosophy and Literature 26, 1 (April 2002), pp. 207–15Google Scholar