Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” The Journal of Politics 60(3):634–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan I. and Webster, Steven W.. 2016. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41:12–22.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan I. and Webster, Steven W.. 2018 a. The Angry American Voter: Negative Partisanship, Voter Anger, and the 2016 Presidential Election. In State of the Parties, ed. John C. Green, Daniel J. Coffey, and David B. Cohen. University of Akron Press, pp. 185–197.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan I. and Webster, Steven W.. 2018 b. “Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties But Behave Like Rabid Partisans.” Political Psychology 39:119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrams, Abigail. 2019. “Robert Mueller’s Legacy Will Haunt Donald Trump.” https://time.com/5598470/robert-mueller-investigation-haunt-donald-trump/. Accessed: 2019-09-22.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W., Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, Levinson, Daniel, and Sanford, Nevitt. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Albertson, Bethany and Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, Bem P. 1994. Personality Theories. Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Allport, Gordon W. and Odbert, Henry S.. 1936. “Trait-Names: A Psycho-Lexical Study.” Psychological Monographs 47(1):1–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allred, Keith G. 1999. Anger and Retaliation: Toward an Understanding of Impassioned Conflict in Organizations. In Research on Negotiation in Organizations, ed. Robert J. Bies, Roy J. Lewicki, and Blair H. Sheppard. JAI Press, pp. 27–58.Google Scholar

Allred, Keith G., Mallozzi, John S., Matsui, Fusako, and Raia, Christopher P.. 1997. “The Influence of Anger and Compassion on Negotiation Performance.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70(3):175–187.Google Scholar

Anderson, Christopher J., Blais, Andrè, Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Listhaug, Ola. 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, Kevin and Johnson, Martin. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Averill, James R. 1982. Anger and Aggression: An Essay on Emotion. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Bafumi, Joseph and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” Journal of Politics 71(1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakshy, Eytan, Messing, Solomon, and Adamic, Lada A.. 2015. “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science 348(6239):1130–1132.Google Scholar

Banda, Kevin K. and Cluverius, John. 2018. “Elite Polarization, Party Extremity, and Affective Polarization.” Electoral Studies 56:90–101.Google Scholar

Banks, Antoine J. 2014. “The Public’s Anger: White Racial Attitudes and Opinions toward Health Care Reform.” Political Behavior 36:493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banks, Antoine J. and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2012. “Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 56(2): 286–297.Google Scholar

Bennett, Roger. 1997. “Anger, Catharsis, and Purchasing Behavior Following Aggressive Customer Complaints.”Journal of Consumer Marketing 14(2):156–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah A. 1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-1996.” American Political Science Review 93(3):519–533.Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah A. 2004. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Black, Earl and Black, Merle. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bodenhausen, Galen V., Sheppard, Lori A., and Kramer, Geoffrey P.. 1994. “Negative Affect and Social Judgment: The Differential Impact of Anger and Sadness.” European Journal of Social Psychology 24(1):45–62.Google Scholar

Bollen, Kenneth A. 1980. “Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy.” American Sociological Review 45(3):370–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bollen, Kenneth A. 1993. “Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in Cross-National Measures.” American Journal of Political Science 37(4):1207–1230.Google Scholar

Bollen, Kenneth A. and Paxton, Pamela. 2000. “Subjective Measures of Liberal Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 33(1):58–86.Google Scholar

Bower, Gordon H. 1991. Mood Congruity of Social Judgments. In Emotions and Social Judgments, ed. Joseph P. Forgas. Pergamon Press, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar

Brader, Ted, Valentino, Nicholas A., and Suhay, Elizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4):959–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bratton, Michael and van de Walle, Nicolas. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Buss, David M. 1999. Human Nature and Individual Differences: The Evolution of Human Personality. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, ed. Lawrence A. Pervin and Oliver P. John. The Guilford Press, pp. 31–56.Google Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Wiley.Google Scholar

Chernow, Ron. 2005. Alexander Hamilton. Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Citrin, Jack. 1974. “Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government.” American Political Science Review 68(3):973–988.Google Scholar

Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. and Schurer, Stefanie. 2012. “The Stability of Big-Five Personality Traits.” Economics Letters 115:11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Eliza. 2016. “Poll: Clinton, Trump Most Unfavorable Candidates Ever.” www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/08/31/poll-clinton-trump-most-unfavorable-candidates-ever/89644296/. Accessed: 2018-04-26.Google Scholar

Conley, Timothy G., Hansen, Christian B., and Rossi, Peter E.. 2008. “Plausibly Exogenous.” www.princeton.edu/erp/erp%20seminar%20pdfs/papersspring09/Rossi%20paper%202.pdf. Accessed: 2018-10-06.Google Scholar

Cooper, Christopher A., Golden, Lauren, and Socha, Alan. 2013. “The Big Five Personality Factors and Mass Politics.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43(1):68–82.Google Scholar

Coppock, Alexander and McClellan, Oliver A.. 2018. “Validating the Demographic, Political, Psychological, and Experimental Results Obtained from a New Source of Online Survey Respondents.” Research & Politics. DOI: 10.1177/2053168018822174.Google Scholar

Costa, Paul T. and McCrae, Robert R.. 1995. “Domains and Facets: Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.” Journal of Personality Assessment 64(1):21–50.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Matthew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, Maureen A. and Richeson, Jennifer A.. 2017. “Information about the U.S. Racial Demographic Shift Triggers Concerns about Anti-White Discrimination among the Prospective White ‘Minority’.” PLoS ONE 12(9). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185389.Google Scholar

Crawford, Jarret T., Modri, Sean A., and Motyl, Matt. 2013. “Bleeding-Heart Liberals and Hard-Hearted Conservatives: Subtle Political Dehumanization through Differential Attributions of Human Nature and Human Uniqueness Traits.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 1:86–104.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

DeBenedetti, Charles. 1990. An American Ordeal: The Antiwar Movement of the Vietnam Era. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

DellaVigna, Stefano and Kaplan, Ethan. 2007. “The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(3):1187–1234.Google Scholar

Digman, John M. 1989. “Five Robust Trait Dimensions: Development, Stability, and Utility.” Journal of Personality 57(2):195–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DiMaggio, Paul, Evans, John, and Bryson, Bethany. 1996. “Have Americans’ Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?” American Journal of Sociology 102(3):690–755.Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper.Google Scholar

Dunn, Jennifer R. and Schweitzer, Maurice E.. 2005. “Feeling and Believing: The Influence of Emotion on Trust.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88(5):736–748.Google Scholar

Dunwoody, Philip T. and McFarland, Sam G.. 2017. “Support for Anti-Muslim Policies: The Role of Political Traits and Threat Perception.” Political Psychology 39(1):89–106.Google Scholar

Dvir-Gvirsman, Shira. 2016. “Media Audience Homophily: Partisan Websites, Audience Identity and Polarization Processes.” New Media & Society 19(7):1072–1091.Google Scholar

Feinberg, Matthew and Willer, Robb. 2012. “The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes.” Psychological Science 24(1):56–62.Google Scholar

Feldman, Stanley. 2003. “Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 24(1):41–74.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Pearson College Division.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50(1):5–25.Google Scholar

Flint, Joe and Ballhaus, Rebecca. 2015. “Cable TV News Binges on Trump Coverage.” www.wsj.com/articles/cable-tv-news-binges-on-trump-coverage-1442360415?cb=logged0.789677913999185. Accessed: 2018-08-22.Google Scholar

Forgas, Joseph P. and Moylan, Stephanie. 1987. “After the Movies: Transient Mood and Social Judgments.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13(4): 467–477.Google Scholar

Fournier, Ron. 2015. “Why We’re Voting for the Wrong Reasons.” www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/05/why-were-voting-for-the-wrong-reasons/460842/. Accessed: 2018-01-22.Google Scholar

Frazin, Rachel. 2019. “‘Lock her up’ Chant Breaks Out at Trump Rally.” https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/455874-lock-her-up-chant-breaks-out-at-trump-rally. Accessed: 2019-09-23.Google Scholar

Frimer, Jeremy A., Brandt, Mark J., Melton, Zachary, and Moty, Matt. N.d. “Extremists on the Left and Right Use Angry, Negative Language.” Working Paper. Available at https://osf.io/5mvyk/. Accessed: 2018-10-19.Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Doherty, David, Dowling, Conor M., and Shang, E. Ha. 2010. “Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships across Issue Domains and Political Contexts.” American Political Science Review 104(1):111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Doherty, David, and Dowling, Conor M.. 2012. “Disagreement and the Avoidance of Political Discussion: Aggregate Relationships and Differences across Personality Traits.” American Journal of Political Science 56(4):849–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gervais, Bryan T. 2016. “More Than Mimicry? The Role of Anger in Uncivil Reactions to Elite Political Incivility.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 29(3):384–405.Google Scholar

Gilberstadt, Hannah. 2019. “For the First Time, Majority of Republicans Express Confidence in the Fairness of Mueller’s Investigation.” www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/07/23/majority-republicans-express-confidence-fairness-mueller-investigation/. Accessed: 2019-09-23.Google Scholar

Gino, Francesca and Schweitzer, Maurice E.. 2008. “Blinded by Anger or Feeling the Love: How Emotions Influence Advice Taking.” Journal of Applied Psychology 93(5):1165–1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glasser, Susan N. 2019. “Trump’s Wacky, Angry, and Extreme August.” www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-trumps-washington/trumps-wacky-angry-and-extreme-august-twitter. Accessed: 2019-09-23.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Lewis R., Johnson, John A., Eber, Herbert W., Hogan, Robert, Ashton, Michael C., Robert Cloninger, C., and Gough, Harrison G.. 2006. “The International Personality Item Pool and the Future of Public-Domain Personality Measures.” Journal of Research in Personality 40:84–96.Google Scholar

Gorsuch, Richard L. 1983. Factor Analysis. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gottfried, Jeffrey, Stocking, Galen, and Grieco, Elizabeth. 2018. “Partisans Remain Sharply Divided in Their Attitudes about the News Media.” www.journalism.org/2018/09/25/partisans-remain-sharply-divided-in-their-attitudes-about-the-news-media/. Accessed: 2019-09-23.Google Scholar

Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Greene, Joshua and Haidt, Jonathan. 2002. “How (And Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(12):517–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grimmer, Justin. 2013. Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grimmer, Justin and King, Gary. 2011. “General Purpose Computer-Assisted Clustering and Conceptualization.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(7):2643–2650.Google Scholar

Grossmann, Matt and Thaler, Daniel. 2018. “Mass-Elite Divides in Aversion to Social Change and Support for Donald Trump.” American Politics Research 46(5):753–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guess, Andrew, Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2018. “Selective Exposure to Misinformation: Evidence from the Consumption of Fake News during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign.” Working Paper. Available at www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/fake-news-2016.pdf.Google Scholar

Hannah-Jones, Nikole. 2019. “It Was Never About Busing.” www.nytimes.com/2019/07/12/opinion/sunday/it-was-never-about-busing.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytopinion. Accessed: 2019-07-14.Google Scholar

Helmke, Gretchen and Levitsky, Steven. 2006. Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Hetherington, Marc J. 2005. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hetherington, Marc J. and Rudolph, Thomas J.. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hetherington, Marc J. and Suhay, Elizabeth. 2011. “Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans’ Support for the War on Terror.” American Journal of Political Science 55(3):546–560.Google Scholar

Hetherington, Marc J. and Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Holbert, R. Lance and Hansen, Glenn J.. 2008. “Stepping beyond Message Specificity in the Study of Emotion as Mediator and Inter-Emotion Associations across Attitude Objects: Fahrenheit 9/11, Anger, and Debate Euperiority.” Media Psychology 11(1):98–118.Google Scholar

Hood, M. V., Kidd, Quentin, and Morris, Irwin L.. 2004. “The Reintroduction of the Elephas Maximus to the Southern United States: The Rise of Republican State Parties, 1960 to 2000.” American Politics Research 32(1):68–101.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Daniel J. 2018. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Huddy, Leonie, Mason, Lilliana, and Aarøe, Lene. 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109(1):1–17.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto and Hahn, Kyu S.. 2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication 59(1): 19–39.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto and Westwood, Sean J.. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(3):690–707.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3):405–431.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2015. “It’s Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections.” The Journal of Politics 77(3):861–873.Google Scholar

James, William. 1884. “What Is an Emotion?” Mind (34):188–205.Google Scholar

Johnston, Christopher D., Federico, Christopher M., and Lavine, Howard. 2017. Open versus Closed: Personality, Identity, and the Politics of Redistribution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Robert P. 2016. The End of White Christian America. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Kalmoe, Nathan P. 2018. “Legitimizing Partisan Violence: Evidence of Political Bias in State Violence Views from Four Experiments.” Working Paper. Available at www.dropbox.com/s/olwz6jso16rg0ip/Kalmoe%20-%20Legitimizing%20Partisan%20Violence.pdf?dl=0.Google Scholar

Keltner, Dacher, Ellsworth, Phoebe C., and Edwards, Kari. 1993. “Beyond Simple Pessimism: Effects of Sadness and Anger on Social Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64(5):740–752.Google Scholar

Kim, Hyo J. and Cameron, Glen T.. 2011. “Emotions Matter in Crisis: The Role of Anger and Sadness in the Publics’ Response to Crisis News Framing and Corporate Crisis Response.” Communication Research 38(6):826–855.Google Scholar

Klar, Samara. 2014. “Partisanship in a Social Setting.” American Journal of Political Science 58(3):687–704.Google Scholar

Klar, Samara and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2016. Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of US Lawmaking. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Krieg, Gregory. 2016. “Clinton Takes on Trump: Her 34 Toughest Lines.” www.cnn.com/2016/06/02/politics/hillary-clinton-attack-lines-donald-trump-foreign-policy/index.html. Accessed: 2018-04-27.Google Scholar

Lapinski, John, Levendusky, Matt, Winneg, Ken, and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2016. “What Do Citizens Want from Their Member of Congress?” Political Research Quarterly 69(3):535–545.Google Scholar

Lauth, Hans-Joachim. 2000. “Informal Institutions and Democracy.” Democratization 7(4):21–50.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Regina G., Molyneux, Logan, Coddington, Mark, and Holton, Avery. 2014. “Tweeting Conventions: Political Journalists’ Use of Twitter to Cover the 2012 Presidential Campaign.” Journalism Studies 14(6):789–806.Google Scholar

Layman, Geoffrey C. and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4):786–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazarus, Richard S. and Smith, Craig A.. 1988. “Knowledge and Appraisal in the Cognition-Emotion Relationship.” Cognition & Emotion 2(4):281–300.Google Scholar

LeDoux, Joseph. 1998. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Lee, M. J. and Merica, Dan. 2016. “Clinton’s Last Campaign Speech: ‘Love trumps hate’.” www.cnn.com/2016/11/07/politics/hillary-clinton-campaign-final-day/index.html. Accessed: 2018-04-27.Google Scholar

Lerner, Jennifer S. and Keltner, Dacher. 2001. “Fear, Anger, and Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(1):146–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lerner, Jennifer S. and Tiedens, Larissa Z.. 2006. “Portrait of the Angry Decision Maker: How Appraisal Tendencies Shape Anger’s Influence on Cognition.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19:115–137.Google Scholar

Lerner, Jennifer S., Gonzalez, Roxana M., Small, Deborah A., and Fischhoff, Baruch. 2003. “Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism: A National Field Experiment.” Psychological Science 14(2):144–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levendusky, Matthew S. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levendusky, Matthew S. 2013. How Partisan Media Polarize America. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. Penguin Random House.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan J. and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1963. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Lobbestael, Jill, Arntz, Arnoud, and Wiers, Reinout W.. 2008. “How to Push Some-one’s Buttons: A Comparison of Four Anger-Induction Methods.” Cognition & Emotion 22(2):353–373.Google Scholar

Lord, Wendy. 2007. NEO-PI-R: A Guide to Interpretation and Feedback in a Work Context. Hogrefe Ltd.Google Scholar

MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, Keele, Luke, and Marcus, George E.. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54(2):440–458.Google Scholar

Malka, Ariel and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2010. “More Than Ideology: Conservative-Liberal Identity and Receptivity to Political Cues.” Social Justice Research 23(2–3):156–188.Google Scholar

Marcus, George E. 2002. The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. Penn State University Press.Google Scholar

Marcus, George E., Russell Neuman, W., and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Gregory J. and McCrain, Josh. 2019. “Local News and National Politics.” American Political Science Review 113 (2): 372–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Gregory J. and Yurukoglu, Ali. 2017. “Bias in Cable News: Persuasion and Polarization.” American Economic Review 107(9):2565–2599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mason, Lilliana. 2013. “The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate.” American Behavioral Scientist 57(1):140–159.Google Scholar

Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.”American Journal of Political Science 59(1):128–145.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 2001. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-2002. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McCrae, Robert R. and Costa, Paul T.. 1994. “The Stability of Personality: Observations and Evaluations.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 3(6): 173–175.Google Scholar

McGregor, Shannon C. and Molyneux, Logan. 2018. “Twitter’s Influence on News Judgment: An Experiment among Journalists.” Journalism. DOI: 10.1177/1464884918802975.Google Scholar

Mondak, Jeffery J. 2010. Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mondak, Jeffery J. and Halperin, Karen D.. 2008. “A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 38(2):335–362.Google Scholar

Mondak, Jeffrey K., Canache, Damarys, Seligson, Mitchell A., and Anderson, Mary R.. 2010. “Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior.” American Political Science Review 104(1):85–110.Google Scholar

Moons, Wesley G., Eisenberger, Naomi I., and Taylor, Shelley E.. 2010. “Anger and Fear Responses to Stress Have Different Biological Profiles.” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 24:215–219.Google Scholar

Mourão, Rachel Reis. 2014. “The Boys on the Timeline: Political Journalists’ Use of Twitter for Building Interpretive Communities.” Journalism 16(8): 1107–1123.Google Scholar

Mutz, Diana. 2015. In-Your-Face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newhagen, John E. 1998. “TV News Images That Induce Anger, Fear, and Disgust: Effects on Approach-Avoidance and Memory.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 42(2):265–276.Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa. 2008. Driving Democracy: Do Power-Sharing Institutions Work? Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. Penguin.Google Scholar

Paunonen, Sampo V. and Ashton, Michael C.. 2001. “Big Five Factors and Facets and the Prediction of Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(3):524–539.Google Scholar

PBS. 2016. “Election 2016 in One Word.” www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/web-video/election-2016-one-word. Accessed: 2018-05-11.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. 2015. “Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government.” www.people-press.org/2015/11/23/1-trust-in-government-1958-2015/. Accessed: 2017-01-25.Google Scholar

Piedmont, Ralph L. 1989. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Clinical and Research Applications. Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham. 2005. The Chain of Responsiveness. In Assessing the Quality of Democracy, ed. Larry Diamond and Leonardo Morlino. Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 61–76.Google Scholar

Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, Sarah K. and Clark, Lee Anna. 2001. “Predicting Dimensions of Personality Disorder from Domains and Facets of the Five-Factor Model.” Journal of Personality 62(2):199–222.Google Scholar

Rhodes, Jesse H. and Vayo, Amber B.. 2018. “Fear and Loathing in Presidential Candidate Rhetoric, 1952-2016.” Working Paper. Available at www.dropbox.com/s/ec4nwkdgnjlbo0d/rhodes-vayo-APSA-2018.pdf?dl=0.Google Scholar

Rogowski, Jon C. and Sutherland, Joseph L.. 2015. “How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization.” Political Behavior 38:1–24.Google Scholar

Roseman, Ira J., Spindel, Martin S., and Jose, Paul E.. 1990. “Appraisals of Emotion-Eliciting Events: Testing a Theory of Discrete Emotions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(5):899–915.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Sam. 2018. The Polarizers: Postwar Architects of Our Partisan Era. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rubin, Lillian B. 1972. Busing and Backlash: White against White in a California School District. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saad, Lydia. 2016. “Trump and Clinton Finish with Historically Poor Images.” http://news.gallup.com/poll/197231/trump-clinton-finish-historically-poor-images.aspx. Accessed: 2018-04-26.Google Scholar

Schwarz, Norbert and Clore, Gerald. 1983. “Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Well-Being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(3):513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, Paul J. 2009. “Looking Past Pleasure: Anger, Confusion, Disgust, Pride, Surprise, and Other Unusual Aesthetic Emotions.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3(1):48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1997. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. CQ Press.Google Scholar

Skitka, Linda J., Bauman, Christopher W., and Sargis, Edward G.. 2005. “Moral Conviction: Another Contributor to Attitude Strength or Something More?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88(6):895–917.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda and Williamson, Vanessa. 2016. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Gregory A. and Martinez, Jessica. 2016. “How the Faithful Voted: A Preliminary 2016 Analysis.” www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/how-the-faithful-voted-a-preliminary-2016-analysis/. Accessed: 2019-02-11.Google Scholar

Smith, Samantha. 2016. “6 Charts That Show Where Clinton and Trump Supporters Differ.” www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/10/20/6-charts-that-show-where-clinton-and-trump-supporters-differ/. Accessed: 2019-01-12.Google Scholar

Sood, Gaurav and Iyengar, Shanto. 2018. “All in the Eye of the Beholder: Partisan Affect and Ideological Accountability.” In The Feeling, Thinking Citizen: Essays in Honor of Milton Lodge, ed. Howard Lavine and Charles S. Taber. Routledge, pp. 195–228Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Svolik, Milan W. 2018. “When Polarization Trumps Civic Virtue: Partisan Conflict and the Subversion of Democracy by Incumbents.” Working Paper. Available at https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/campuspress.yale.edu/dist/6/1038/files/2017/11/Svolik-Polarization-16xwfa7.pdf.Google Scholar

Taub, Amanda and Fisher, Max. 2017. “As Leaks Multiply, Fears of a ‘Deep State’ in America.” www.nytimes.com/2017/02/16/world/americas/deep-state-leaks-trump.html?_r=0&referer=https://t.co/WwEWvgjncz. Accessed: 2019-09-23.Google Scholar

Tausczik, Yla R. and Pennebaker, James W.. 2010. “The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods.”Journal of Language of Social Psychology 29(1):24–54.Google Scholar

The Economist. 2017. “Declining Trust in Government Is Denting Democracy.” www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/01/daily-chart-20?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/decliningtrustingovernmentisdentingdemocracy. Accessed: 2017-01-25.Google Scholar

Tiedens, Larissa Z. 2001. “The Effect of Anger on the Hostile Inferences of Aggressive and Nonaggressive People: Specific Emotions, Cognitive Processing, and Chronic Accessibility.” Motivation and Emotion 25(3):233–251.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1835. Democracy in America.Google Scholar

Valentino, Nicholas A., Gregorowicz, Krysha, and Groenendyk, Eric W.. 2009. “Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation.” Political Behavior 31(3):307–330.Google Scholar

Valentino, Nicholas A., Brader, Ted, Groenendyk, Eric W., Gregorowicz, Krysha, and Hutchings, Vincent L.. 2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics (1):156–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagner, Michael W. and Gruszczynski, Mike. 2017. “Who Gets Covered? Ideological Extremity and News Coverage of Members of the U.S. Congress, 1993 to 2013.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 95(3):670–690.Google Scholar

Webb, Daryl. 1995. “Crusade: George McGovern’s Opposition to the Vietnam War.” Master’s Thesis, St. Cloud State University.Google Scholar

Webster, Steven W. 2018 a. “Anger and Declining Trust in Government in the American Electorate.” Political Behavior 40(4): 933–964.Google Scholar

Webster, Steven W. 2018 b. “It’s Personal: The Big Five Personality Traits and Negative Partisan Affect in Polarized U.S. Politics.” American Behavioral Scientist 62(1):127–145.Google Scholar

Webster, Steven W. and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 2017. “The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the US Electorate.” American Politics Research 45(4):621–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiner, Bernard. 2000. “Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Theories of Motivation from an Attributional Perspective.” Educational Psychology Review 12: 1–14.Google Scholar

Wells, Tom. 1994. The War Within: America’s Battle over Vietnam. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wiggins, Jerry S. 1996. The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, Vanessa, Skocpol, Theda, and Coggin, John. 2011. “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism.” Perspectives on Politics 9(1): 25–43.Google Scholar

Zahn, Harry. 2016. “Why ‘Negative Partisanship’ Is Flipping Politics on Its Head.” www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/negative-partisanship-flipping-politics-head. Accessed: 2018-01-22.Google Scholar