Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 The evolution of alternative reproductive tactics: concepts and questions
- PART I ULTIMATE CAUSES AND ORIGINS OF ALTERNATIVE REPRODUCTIVE TACTICS
- PART II PROXIMATE MECHANISMS OF ALTERNATIVE REPRODUCTIVE TACTICS
- PART III TAXONOMIC REVIEWS OF ALTERNATIVE REPRODUCTIVE TACTICS
- 8 Alternative reproductive tactics in insects
- 9 The expression of crustacean mating strategies
- 10 Alternative reproductive tactics in fish
- 11 Alternative reproductive tactics in amphibians
- 12 Alternative reproductive tactics in reptiles
- 13 Alternative reproductive tactics in birds
- 14 Alternative reproductive tactics in nonprimate male mammals
- 15 Alternative reproductive tactics in primates
- PART IV EMERGING PERSPECTIVES ON ALTERNATIVE REPRODUCTIVE TACTICS
- Index of species
- Subject index
- References
9 - The expression of crustacean mating strategies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 The evolution of alternative reproductive tactics: concepts and questions
- PART I ULTIMATE CAUSES AND ORIGINS OF ALTERNATIVE REPRODUCTIVE TACTICS
- PART II PROXIMATE MECHANISMS OF ALTERNATIVE REPRODUCTIVE TACTICS
- PART III TAXONOMIC REVIEWS OF ALTERNATIVE REPRODUCTIVE TACTICS
- 8 Alternative reproductive tactics in insects
- 9 The expression of crustacean mating strategies
- 10 Alternative reproductive tactics in fish
- 11 Alternative reproductive tactics in amphibians
- 12 Alternative reproductive tactics in reptiles
- 13 Alternative reproductive tactics in birds
- 14 Alternative reproductive tactics in nonprimate male mammals
- 15 Alternative reproductive tactics in primates
- PART IV EMERGING PERSPECTIVES ON ALTERNATIVE REPRODUCTIVE TACTICS
- Index of species
- Subject index
- References
Summary
CHAPTER SUMMARY
Three fundamental patterns of phenotypic expression exist for alternative mating strategies. These patterns include Mendelian strategies, developmental strategies, and behavioral strategies. Each pattern of expression is revealed by hormonal and neurological factors that regulate the timing and degree to which phenotypic differences appear; however, the nature of each regulatory mechanism depends fundamentally on its underlying mode of inheritance. The genetic architectures underlying such inheritance in turn depend on the circumstances in which mating opportunities arise, including the intensity of selection favoring distinct reproductive morphologies, and the predictability of mating opportunities within individual lifespans. This chapter concerns the nature of this variation and its possible causes, with illustrations from the Crustacea.
INTRODUCTION
Although crustaceans were among the first recorded examples of alternative mating strategies (Orchestia darwinii: Darwin 1874, p. 275; Tanais spp.: Darwin 1874, p. 262), there is currently no synthetic treatment of how such polymorphisms are expressed within this group. The apparent scarcity of reports of male polymorphism among crustaceans is unexpected given the frequency with which sexual selection has been demonstrated within this taxon (Holdich 1968, 1971, Manning 1975, Stein 1976, Thompson and Manning 1981, Knowlton 1980, Shuster 1981, Christy 1983, Hatziolos and Caldwell 1983, reviews in Salmon 1984, Koga et al. 1993). As explained below, when sexual selection occurs, alternative mating strategies are likely to evolve. This chapter provides an evolutionary framework for understanding the expression of alternative mating strategies, with illustrations from the Crustacea (Table 9.1).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Alternative Reproductive TacticsAn Integrative Approach, pp. 224 - 250Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
, , and 1986. Natural history and social organization of the semiterrestrial grapsid crab, Pachygrapsus transversus (Gibbes). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 104, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1996. The pubertal molt in Crustacea revisited. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 30, 177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. A classification of alternative reproductive behaviors, and methods for field testing ESS models. American Zoologist 24, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2004. Experimental test of socially mediated sex change in a protandric simultaneous hermaphrodite, the marine shrimp Lysmata wurdemanni (Caridea: Hippolytidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55, 544–550.Google Scholar
, , and 1992. Effects of size and morphotype on dominance hierarchies and resource competition in the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Animal Behaviour 44, 547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. Sex change and life history pattern in the shrimp Thor manningi (Decapoda: Caridea): a novel case of partial protandric hermaphroditism. Biological Bulletin 170, 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. Repetitive copulation and variable success of insemination in the marine shrimp Sicyonia dorsalis (Decapoda: Penaeoidea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 12, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Simultaneous hermaphroditism in caridean shrimps: a unique and puzzling sexual system in the Decapoda. Journal of Crustacean Biology 20, 116–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. The reproductive ecology of a protandric simultaneous hermaphrodite, the shrimp Lysmata wurdemanni (Decapoda: Caridea: Hippolytidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 22, 742–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1996. Simultaneous hermaphroditism in the marine shrimp Lysmata wurdemanni (Caridea: Hippolytidae): an undescribed sexual system in the decapod Crustacea. Marine Biology 132, 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belk, D. 1991. Anostracan mating behavior: a case of scramble-competition polygyny. In and (eds.) Crustacean Sexual Biology, pp. 111–125. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
1997. Do protandric pandalid shrimp have environmental sex determination?Marine Biology 128, 397–407.Google Scholar
and 1973. Le polymorphisme des variants sexuels des males chez Jaera (albifrons) ischiosetosa Forsman (Isopoda: Asellota). Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale 114, 111–128.Google Scholar
Boddeke, R., Bosschieter, J. R., and Goudswaard, P. C. 1991. Sex change, mating, and sperm transfer in Crangon crangon (L.). In and (eds.) Crustacean Sexual Biology, pp. 164–182. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
, , , and 2000. Density-dependent natural selection in Drosophila: correlations between feeding rate, development time and viability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. The pattern of tube-sharing in Microdeutopus gryllotalpa (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Animal Behaviour 28, 790–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. Effects of receptive females' secretions on some male reproductive behaviors in the amphipod crustacean Microdeutopus gryllotalpa. Marine Biology 84, 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985. Differences in reproductive behavior between two male morphs of the amphipod crustacean, Jassa falcata Montagu. Physiological Zoology 58, 497–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989. The effects of residential tubes on reproductive behaviors in Microdeutopus gryllotalpa (Costa) (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 8, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13, 115–155.Google Scholar
and 1998. Medfly courtship duration: a sexually selected reaction norm changed by crowding. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 10, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1978. Protandry in the freshwater shrimp, Paratya curvirostris (Heller, 1862) (Decapoda: Atyidae), with a review of the phenomenon and its significance in the Decapoda. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 8, 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. The shrimps of the Smithsonian Bredin Caribbean expeditions, with a summary of the West Indian shallow-water shrimps (Crustacea: Natantia: Decapoda). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 998, 1–179.Google Scholar
1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23, 333–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18, 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979. Natural selection and sex change in pandalid shrimp: test of a life history theory. American Naturalist 113, 715–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1983. Female choice in the resource defense mating system of the sand fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 12, 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1991. Comparative studies of reproductive behavior in mantis shrimps and fiddler crabs. American Zoologist 31, 329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. Dimorphic males display alternative reproductive strategies in the marine amphipod Jassa marmorata Holmes (Corophioidea: Ischyroceridae). Ethology 103, 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. Precopulatory mating behavior and sexual dimorphism in the amphipod Crustacea. Hydrobiologia 223, 255–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2003. Population structure and operational sex ratio in the rock shrimp, Rynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 23, 849–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and 2000. Mating behaviour and fertilization success of three ontogenetic stages of male rock shrimp Rynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 20, 628–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and 2003. Male dominance hierarchy and mating tactics in the rock shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 23, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. Courtship and chemical signals in the American lobster. Journal of Shellfish Research 10, 284.Google Scholar
and 1990. Moult staggering and serial monogamy in American lobsters, Homarus americanus. Animal Behaviour 39, 1199–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. Basic Concepts in Population, Quantitative and Evolutionary Genetics. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
and 1979. Population dynamics of Euterpina acutifrons (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) from North Inlet, South Carolina, with reference to dimorphic males. Marine Biology 54, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1874. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1980. Good strategy or evolutionary stable strategy? In G. W. Barlow and (eds.) Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture? pp. 331–367. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
, , and 2001. Alternative mating tactics in the alpine newt Triturus alpestris alpestris. Journal of Herpetology 35, 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1995. Effects of natural variation in sex ratio and habitat structure on mate-guarding decisions in amphipods (Crustacea). Behaviour 133, 985–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989. Structure and function of the reproductive system of the symbiotic spider crab Inachus phalangium (Decapoda: Majidae): observations on sperm transfer, sperm storage, and spawning. Journal of Crustacean Biology 9, 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. Alternative mating tactics and evolutionary stable strategies. American Zoologist 24, 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, W. G. 1979. The function of horns in Podichnus agenor (Dynastinae) and other beetles. In and (eds.) Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, pp. 231–258. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1982. Beetle horn dimorphism: making the best of a bad lot. American Naturalist 119, 420–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. Artificial selection on horn length–body size allometry in the horned beetle, Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Evolution 50, 1219–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. New York: Longman Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
1997. The pheromonal role of cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila melanogaster. BioEssays 19, 353–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2000. The evolutionary stability of mixed strategies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 482–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. An experimental investigation into status-dependent male dimorphism in the European earwig, Forficula auricularia. Animal Behaviour 65, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1970. Hermaphroditisme protérandrique chez une crevette de la famille des crangonidés, Argis dentata Rathbun. Le Naturaliste Canadien 97, 805–822.Google Scholar
1972. Male dimorphism as a consequence of sexual selection. American Naturalist 106, 574–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1993. Protandrous hermaphroditism in the tropical shrimp Athanus indicus (Decapoda: Caridea) a symbiont of sea urchins. Journal of Crustacean Biology 13, 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. Identification of V1R-like putative pheromone receptor sequences in non-human primates: characterization of V1R pseudogenes in marmoset, a primate species that possesses an intact vomeronasal organ. Chemical Senses 27, 529–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gowaty, P. A. 1997. Sexual dialectics, sexual selection and variation in reproductive behavior. In (ed.) Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections and Frontiers, pp. 351–384. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985. Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon. Nature 313, 47–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11, 92–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, M. R. and Repka, J. 1998. Game theory and inheritance of the conditional strategy. In and (eds.) Game Theory and Animal Behavior, pp. 168–187. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and 1995. Multiple mating, sperm competition and meiotic drive. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1965. Development of the copepod Euterpina acutifrons with special reference to dimorphism in the male. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 144, 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. Breeding of Euterpina acutifrons, a harpacticoid copepod, with special reference to dimorphic males. Marine Biology 15, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1973. Factors affecting production of dimorphic males of Euterpina acutifrons. Marine Biology 19, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1999. Differentiation of morphotypes in female population of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man) on the basis of distance function analysis. Proceedings of the 4th Indian Fisheries Forum, 24–28 November, 1996, Kochi, Kerala, pp. 65–67.Google Scholar
and 1983. Role reversal in courtship in the stomatopod Pseudosquilla ciliata (Crustacea). Animal Behaviour 31, 1077–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1990. A polygenic model of the evolution and maintenance of conditional strategies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 242, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1968. Reproduction, growth and bionomics of Dynamene bidentata (Crustacea: Isopoda). Journal of Zoology (London) 156, 136–153.Google Scholar
1971. Changes in physiology, structure and histochemistry during the life history of the sexually dimorphic isopod, Dynamene bidentata (Crustacea: Peracarida). Marine Biology 8, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2004. Transgenic male mating advantage provides opportunity for trojan gene effect in a fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 2934–2938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2001. Status-dependent selection in the dimorphic beetle Onthophagus taurus. Proceedingsof the Royal Society of London B 268, 2409–2414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998. Variation in courtship rate in the fiddler crab Uca annulipes: is it related to male attractiveness?Behavioral Ecology 9, 605–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998. Female behaviour, sexual competition and mate guarding in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Animal Behaviour 55, 589–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1998. Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict. Quarterly Review of Biology 73, 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999. Female reproductive cycles and sexual conflict over precopulatory mate-guarding in Thermosphaeroma isopods. Ethology 105, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1994. Male choice and male–male competition in Idotea baltica (Crustacea, Isopoda). Ethology 96, 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1999. Reproductive anatomy, sexual conflict and paternity in Thermosphaeroma thermophilum. Marine and Freshwater Behavior and Physiology 32, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karplus, I., Malecha, S. R., and Sagi, A. 2000. The biology and management of size variation. In and (eds.) Freshwater Prawn Culture, pp. 259–289. Bet-Dagan, Israel: Agricultural Research Organization.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. Sexual selection and dimorphism in two demes of a symbiotic, pair-bonding snapping shrimp. Evolution 34, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1998. Reproductive success and two modes of mating in the sand-bubbler crab Scopimera globosa. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 229, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1993. Sperm competition and the assurance of underground copulation in the sand-bubbler crab, Scopiemera globosa (Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 13, 134–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. The mechanisms of morph determination in the amphipod Jassa: implications for the evolution of alternative male phenotypes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269, 1749–1754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and 1987. Morphotypic differentiation of male Malaysian giant prawns, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Journal of Crustacean Biology 7, 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2000. Length–weight relationship of male morphotypes of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man) as a valid index for differentiating their developmental pathway and growth phases. Indian Journal of Fisheries 47, 283–290.Google Scholar
1986. Canalization versus developmental conversion in a spatially variable environment. American Naturalist 128, 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and 2000. Predator-induced defense: variation for inducibility in an intertidal barnacle. Ecology 81, 1240–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. Variation strategies of plants in heterogeneous environments. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 21, 357–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1995. On alternative reproductive tactics in anurans: dynamic games with density and frequency dependence. American Naturalist 146, 365–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1999. Sperm economy and limitation in spiny lobsters. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 46, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. Male discrimination and investment in Asellus aquaticus (L.) and A. meridianus Racovitsza (Crustacea: Isopoda). Behaviour 55, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. Evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. American Naturalist 139, 971–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1984. Annual variation in abundance of female and dimorphic male Euterpina acutifrons (Dana) (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) from the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. Crustaceana 47, 298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1983. Seasonal variation in the abundance of the developmental stages of Euterpina acutifrons (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) from the São Sebastião Channel, southern Brazil. Marine Biology 74, 111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1998. Snow crabs, Chionoecetes opilio (O. Fabricius, 1788) (Crustacea: Majidae) have two types of spermatophore: hypotheses on the mechanism of fertilization and population reproductive dynamics in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. Journal of Natural History 32, 1651–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and 1980. Effects of androgenic gland ablation on male primary and secondary sexual characteristics in the Malaysian prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man) (Decapoda, Palaemonidae), with first evidence of induced feminization in a nonhermaphroditic decapod. General and Comparative Endocrinology 41, 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. Reproductive strategies in a partially protandrous shrimp, Athanas kominatoensis (Decapoda: Alpheidae): sex changes as the best of a bad situation for subordinates. Journal of Ethology 5, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. Paternity and condition affect cannibalistic behavior in nest-tending bluegill sunfish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54, 377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2003. Behavioral, physiological, and endocrine responses of starlings to acute increases in density. Hormones and Behavior 44, 222–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1976. L'évolution des caractères sexuels chez Processa edulis (Risso)(Decapoda: Natantia). Vie et Milieu 26, 65–104.Google Scholar
, , , , and 1995. The breeding ecology of Cancer gracilis (Crustacea: Decapoda: Cancridae) and the mating systems of cancrid crabs. Journal of Zoology (London) 235, 411–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2001. Sensory experience and sensory activity regulate chemosensory receptor gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 11032–11038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and 2001. The effect of the acanthodephalan parasite Pomphorhynchuys laevis on the lipid and glycogen content of its intermediate host Gammmarus pulex. International Journal of Parasitology 31, 346–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1989. Alternative mating strategies in male morphotypes of the freshwater prawn Machrobrachium rosenbergii (DeMan). Biological Bulletin 169, 592–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1995. The evolutionarily stable strategy under individual condition and tactic frequency. Journal of Theoretical Biology 176, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1983. The Explanation of Organic Diversity: The Comparative Method and Adaptations for Mating. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1996. The evolution of threshold traits in animals. Quarterly Review of Biology 71, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and 1994. Methyl farnesoate levels in male spider crabs exhibiting active reproductive behavior. Hormones and Behavior 28, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1984. The courtship, aggression and mating system of a “primitive” fiddler crab (Uca vocans: Ocypodidae). Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 37, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1983. Spatial and temporal aspects of reproduction in North Carolina fiddler crabs (Uca pugilator Bosc). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 70, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989. Inbreeding and sex ratio variation in female-biased populations of a clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. Bulletin of Marine Science 45, 425–432.Google Scholar
1991. Sex ratio variation in female-biased populations of notostracans. Hydrobiologia 212, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1993. The genetic mechanism of sex determination in the conchostracan shrimp Eulimnadia texana. American Naturalist 141, 314–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 1998. Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
1981. Sexual selection in the Socorro isopod, Thermosphaeroma thermophilum (Cole and Bane) (Crustacea: Peracarida). Animal Behaviour 29, 698–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989. Male alternative reproductive behaviors in a marine isopod crustacean (Paracerceis sculpta): the use of genetic markers to measure differences in fertilization success among α-, β-, and γ-males. Evolution 34, 1683–1698.Google Scholar
1992. The reproductive behaviour of α, β-, and γ-males in Paracerceis sculpta, a marine isopod crustacean. Behaviour 121, 231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuster, S. M. 2002. Mating strategies, alternative. In et al. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Evolution, pp. 688–693. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and 1989. Male defense of the breeding cavity and factors affecting the persistence of breeding pairs in the stomatopod, Gonodactylus bredini (Crustacea: Hoplocarida). Ethology 82, 192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999. Sex-linked inheritance of a cuticular pigmentation marker in a marine isopod, Paracerceis sculpta. Journal of Heredity 90, 304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1997. Genetic interaction between male mating strategy and sex ratio in a marine isopod. Nature 388, 373–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1991. Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature 350, 606–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuster, S. M., Ballard, J. O. W., Zinser, G., Sassaman, C., and Keim, P. 2001. The influence of genetic and extrachromosomal factors on population sex ratio in Paracerceis sculpta. In and (eds.) Isopod Systematics and Evolution, vol. 13, Crustacean Issues, pp. 313–326. Amsterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
and 2007. The effect of females on male–male competition in the isopod, Paracerceis Sculpta: a reaction norm approach to behavioral plasticity. Journal of Crustacean Biology 27, 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinervo, B. 2000. Selection in local neighborhoods, the social environment, and ecology of alternative strategies. In (ed.) Model Systems in Behavioral Ecology, pp. 191–226. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
2001. Runaway social games, genetic cycles driven by alternative male and female strategies, and the origin of morphs. Genetica 112, 417–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 1988. Inheritance of male dimorphism in Brazilian populations of Euterpina acutifrons (Dana) (Copepoda: Harpacticoida). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 120, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1976. Sexual dimorphism in crayfish chelae: functional significance linked to reproductive activities. Canadian Journal of Zoology 54, 220–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. Population dynamics of the sponge-dwelling gnathiid isopod Elaphognathia cornigera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999. Spatial distribution patterns of the sponge-dwelling gnathiid isopod Elaphognathia cornigera (Nunomura) on an intertidal rocky shore of the Isu Peninsula, southern Japan. Crustacean Research 28, 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2002. Alternative mating tactics of the gobiid fish Bathygobius fuscus. Journal of Ethology 20, 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1981. Mate selection by Asellus (Crustacea: Isopoda). Behaviour 78, 178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2004. Population density drives the local evolution of a threshold dimorphism. Nature 431, 1099–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2000. Invited review: genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage. Molecular Ecology 9, 1013–1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1987. Asynchronous male and female life cycles in the sexually dimorphic, harem-forming isopod Paragnathia formica (Crustacea: Isopoda). Journal of Zoology (London) 212, 677–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1985. Genotype–environment interactions and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39, 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. Burrow usurpation and duration of surface activity in Scopimera globosa (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory 31, 327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. American Naturalist 114, 742–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. The evolution of parental care in the context of sexual selection: a critical reassessment of parental investment theory. American Naturalist 160, 285–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 2004. Sexual selection: harem size and the variance in male reproductive success. American Naturalist 164, E83–E89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and 2003. Sexual selection favors female-biased sex ratios: the balance between the opposing forces of sex-ratio selection and sexual selection. American Naturalist 162, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 1999. Rates of inbreeding in the androdioecious clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 1402–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. The contributions of programmed developmental change and phenotypic plasticity to within-individual variation in leaf traits in Dicerandra linearifolia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9, 737–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2001. On the assignment of fitness to parents and offspring: whose fitness is it and when does it matter?Journal of Evolutionary Ecology 14, 347–358.Google Scholar
- 22
- Cited by