Book contents
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
- Part II Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
- 8 Integrating Food-Web and Trait-Based Ecology to Investigate Biomass-Trait Feedbacks
- 9 Including the Life Cycle in Food Webs
- 10 Importance of Trait-Related Flexibility for Food-Web Dynamics and the Maintenance of Biodiversity
- 11 Ecological Succession Investigated Through Food-Web Flow Networks
- 12 Statistical Approaches for Inferring and Predicting Food-Web Architecture
- 13 Global Metawebs of Spider Predation Highlight Consequences of Land-Use Change for Terrestrial Predator–Prey Networks
- 14 Ecological Networks in Managed Ecosystems: Connecting Structure to Services
- 15 Trait-Based and Process-Oriented Modeling in Ecological Network Dynamics
- 16 Empirical Methods of Identifying and Quantifying Trophic Interactions for Constructing Soil Food-Web Models
- Part III Food Webs and Environmental Sustainability
- Index
- References
8 - Integrating Food-Web and Trait-Based Ecology to Investigate Biomass-Trait Feedbacks
from Part II - Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2017
Book contents
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
- Part II Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
- 8 Integrating Food-Web and Trait-Based Ecology to Investigate Biomass-Trait Feedbacks
- 9 Including the Life Cycle in Food Webs
- 10 Importance of Trait-Related Flexibility for Food-Web Dynamics and the Maintenance of Biodiversity
- 11 Ecological Succession Investigated Through Food-Web Flow Networks
- 12 Statistical Approaches for Inferring and Predicting Food-Web Architecture
- 13 Global Metawebs of Spider Predation Highlight Consequences of Land-Use Change for Terrestrial Predator–Prey Networks
- 14 Ecological Networks in Managed Ecosystems: Connecting Structure to Services
- 15 Trait-Based and Process-Oriented Modeling in Ecological Network Dynamics
- 16 Empirical Methods of Identifying and Quantifying Trophic Interactions for Constructing Soil Food-Web Models
- Part III Food Webs and Environmental Sustainability
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Adaptive Food WebsStability and Transitions of Real and Model Ecosystems, pp. 107 - 120Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Abrams, P. A. (2000). The evolution of predator–prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 79–105.Google Scholar
Abrams, P. A. (2006). The prerequisites for and likelihood of generalist-specialist coexistence. American Naturalist, 167, 329–342.Google Scholar
Abrams, P. A. (2010). Quantitative descriptions of resource choice in ecological models. Population Ecology, 52, 47–58.Google Scholar
Abrams, P. A. and Matsuda, H. (1997). Prey adaptation as a cause of predator–prey cycles. Evolution, 51, 1742–1750.Google Scholar
Bauer, B., Vos, M., Klauschies, T., and Gaedke, U. (2014). Diversity, functional similarity and top–down control drive synchronization and the reliability of ecosystem function. American Naturalist, 183, 394–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becks, L., Ellner, S. P., Jones, L. E., and Hairston, N. G. (2010). Reduction of adaptive genetic diversity radically alters eco-evolutionary community dynamics. Ecology Letters, 13, 989–997.Google Scholar
Boit, A., Martinez, N. D., Williams, R. J., and Gaedke, U. (2012). Mechanistic theory and modeling of complex food web dynamics in Lake Constance. Ecology Letters, 15, 594–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolnick, D. I., Amarasekare, P., Araujo, M. S., et al. (2011). Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 183–192.Google Scholar
Butchart, S. H. M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328, 1164–1168.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., et al. (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405, 234–242.Google Scholar
Cortez, M. H. (2011). Comparing the qualitatively different effects rapidly evolving and rapidly induced defences have on predator–prey interactions. Ecology Letters, 14, 202–209.Google Scholar
DeWitt, T. J., Sih, A., and Wilson, D. S. (1998). Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 77–81.Google Scholar
Ellner, S. P. and Becks, L. (2011). Rapid prey evolution and the dynamics of two-predator food webs. Theoretical Ecology, 4, 133–152.Google Scholar
Fussmann, G. F., Loreau, M., and Abrams, P. A. (2007). Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Functional Ecology, 21, 465–477.Google Scholar
Göthlich, L. and Oschlies, A. (2012). Phytoplankton niche generation by interspecific stoichiometric variation. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 26. doi:10.1029/2011GB004042.Google Scholar
Gross, T. and Blasius, B. (2008). Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 5, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., et al. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3–35.Google Scholar
Kasada, M., Yamamichi, M., and Yoshida, T. (2014). Form of an evolutionary tradeoff affects eco-evolutionary dynamics in a predator–prey system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 16035–16040.Google Scholar
Lande, R. (1976). Natural-selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution, 30, 314–334.Google Scholar
Miner, B. E., De Meester, L., Pfrender, M. E., Lampert, W., and Hairston, N. G. Jr. (2012). Linking genes to communities and ecosystems: Daphnia as an ecogenomic model. Proceeding of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 1873–1882.Google Scholar
Mooij, W. M., Trolle, D., Jeppesen, E., et al. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for integrating lake ecosystem modelling approaches. Aquatic Ecology, 44, 633–667. doi:10.1007/s10452-010–9339-3 ER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mougi, A. (2012). Unusual predator–prey dynamics under reciprocal phenotypic plasticity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 305, 96–102.Google Scholar
Murdoch, W. W. (1973). Functional response of predators. Journal of Applied Ecology, 10, 335–342.Google Scholar
Naeem, S., Bunker, D. E., Hector, A., et al. (eds.) (2009). Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norberg, J., Urban, M. C., Vellend, M., Klausmeier, C. A., and Loeuille, N. (2012). Eco-evolutionary responses of biodiversity to climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2, 747–751.Google Scholar
Tirok, K. and Gaedke, U. (2010). Internally driven alternation of functional traits in a multi-species predator–prey system. Ecology, 91, 1748–1762.Google Scholar
Tirok, K., Bauer, B., Wirtz, K., and Gaedke, U. (2011). Predator–prey dynamics driven by feedback between functionally diverse trophic levels. PLoS ONE, 6, e27357. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urban, M. C., Leibold, M. A., Amarasekare, P., et al. (2008). The evolutionary ecology of metacommunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23(6), 311–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Velzen, E. and Etienne, R. S. (2013). The evolution and coexistence of generalist and specialist herbivores under between-plant competition. Theoretical Ecology, 6, 87–98.Google Scholar
van Velzen, E. and Etienne, R. S. (2015). The importance of ecological costs for the evolution of plant defense against herbivory. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 372, 89–99.Google Scholar
Vos, M., Kooi, B. W., DeAngelis, D. L., and Mooij, W. M. (2004). Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment. Oikos, 105, 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamichi, M., Yoshida, T., and Sasaki, A. (2011). Comparing the effects of rapid evolution and phenotypic plasticity on predator–prey dynamics. American Naturalist, 178, 287–304.Google Scholar
Yoshida, T., Jones, L. E., Ellner, S. P., Fussmann, G. F., and Hairston, N. G. Jr. (2003). Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator–prey system. Nature, 424, 303–306.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by