Governance limits to effective global financial support for adaptation

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511596667.030

29 - Governance limits to effective global financial support for adaptation

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 August 2009

Richard J. T. Klein and

Edited by

Irene Lorenzoni and

W. Neil Adger: Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Irene Lorenzoni: Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Karen L. O'Brien: Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is one of only a few global environmental treaties with near universal membership (192 Parties). It includes all main contributors to climate change as well as the majority of those that will need to adapt to the adverse effects of climate change. One of the commitments of developed countries under the UNFCCC is to assist developing countries in meeting costs of adaptation to these adverse effects (Article 4.4). The UNFCCC has therefore developed a dedicated system for providing global financial support for adaptation to climate change in developing countries.

As the need for such adaptation is becoming increasingly clear, the World Bank (2006) notes that the total amount of funding for adaptation projected to be available to developing countries by 2012 falls well short of the estimated amounts needed to cover its costs, and considers this shortfall to be the major impediment to adaptation funding:

An assessment of the current financial instruments shows that, while they are technically adequate to respond to the challenge of achieving climate-resilient development, the sums of money flowing through these instruments need to be substantially increased.

(World Bank, 2006, p. 40.)

However, developing countries have expressed the additional concern that the complexity of current funding arrangements constrains their access to money (Decision 3/CP.12; UNFCCC, 2006a, 2007a, 2007b). This would challenge the World Bank's view that the current financial instruments are ‘technically adequate’.

Type: Chapter
Information: Adapting to Climate Change
Thresholds, Values, Governance
, pp. 465 - 475

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596667.030 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

,Commission on Global Governance 1995. Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

,GEF 1994. Instrument for the Establishment of the Restructured Global Environment Facility. Report of the GEF Participants Meeting, 14–16 March 1994, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

,GEF 2004. Programming to Implement the Guidance for the Special Climate Change Fund Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change at its Ninth Session. Washington, DC: GEF.

,GEF 2005. Operational Guidelines for the Strategic Priority ‘Piloting An Operational Approach to Adaptation’ (SPA). Washington, DC: GEF.Google Scholar

,GEF 2007a. LDCF and SCCF Programming Update. Washington, DC: GEF.Google Scholar

,GEF 2007b. Joint Summary of the Chairs, GEF Council Meeting, 14–16 November 2007. Washington, DC: GEF.Google Scholar

,GEF 2007c. Progress Report on the Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) and the Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF). Washington, DC: GEF.Google Scholar

,GEF Evaluation Office 2005. OPS3: Progressing Toward Environmental Results, third overall performance study of the GEF. Washington, DC: Office of Monitoring and Evaluation of the Global Environment Facility.Google Scholar

,GEF Evaluation Office 2006. Evaluation of the GEF Activity Cycle and Modalities, Joint Evaluation of the GEF Evaluation Office and the Evaluation Offices of the Implementing and Executing Agencies of the GEF. Washington, DC: GEF.Google Scholar

Mace, M. J. 2005. ‘Funding for adaptation to climate change: UNFCCC and GEF developments since COP-7’, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 14: 225–246.CrossRef Google Scholar

Möhner, A. and Klein, R. J. T. 2007. The Global Environment Facility: Funding for Adaptation or Adapting to Funds? SEI Working Paper. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.Google Scholar

Müller, B., 2007. Nairobi 2006: Trust and the Future of Adaptation Funding. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar

Paavola, J. and Adger, W. N. 2006. ‘Fair adaptation to climate change’, Ecological Economics 56: 594–609.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sagasti, F. R., Bezanson, K. and Prada, F. 2005. The Future of Development Financing: Challenges and Strategic Choices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Google Scholar

,UNFCCC 2006a. Report on the Latin American Regional Workshop on Adaptation. Geneva: UN.Google Scholar

,UNFCCC 2006b. Report of the Global Environment Facility to the Conference of the Parties. Geneva: UN.Google Scholar

,UNFCCC 2007a. Report on the African Regional Workshop on Adaptation. Geneva: UN.Google Scholar

,UNFCCC 2007b. Report on the Expert Meeting on Adaptation for Small Island Developing States. Geneva: UN.Google Scholar

,UNFCCC 2007c. Report of the Global Environment Facility to the Conference of the Parties. Geneva: UN.Google Scholar

,World Bank 2006. An Investment Framework for Clean Energy and Development: A Progress Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar