Abbott, A. 1999. Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, A. 2009. “À propos du concept de Turning Point”. In Bifurcations, Les sciences sociales face aux ruptures et à l’événement, edited by Grossetti, M., Bessin, M. and Bidart, C. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Abbott, A. 2011. “Time matters. Traduction de l’épilogue par Claire Lemercier et Carine Ollivier”. Terrains & Travaux 19(2): 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, A. 1969. “Chronique sociale et culturelle”. Annuaire de l’Afrique du Nord (8): 472–484.Google Scholar

Adam, A. 1971. “Chronique sociale et culturelle. Maroc 1970”. Annuaire de l’Afrique du Nord (10): 366–379.Google Scholar

Adam, A. 1976. “Chronique sociale et culturelle Maroc”. Annuaire de l’Afrique du Nord (15): 579–589.Google Scholar

Adam, A. and Granai, G. 1962. “Chronique sociale et culturelle Algérie, Maroc & Tunisie”, Annuaire de l’Afrique du Nord (1): 516–526.Google Scholar

Agrikoliansky, É. 2001. “Carrières militantes et vocation à la morale : les militants de la LDH dans les années 1980”. Revue française de science politique 51 (1): 27–46.Google Scholar

Alison, M. H. 2009. Women and Political Violence: Female Combatants in Ethno-National Conflict. Milton Park: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amaral, O. 2010. As transformações na organização interna do partido dos trabalhadores entre 1995 e 1989. PhD, University of Campinas.Google Scholar

Amaral, O. and Power, T. 2016. “The PT at 35: Revisiting Scholarly Interpretations of the Brazilian Worker’s Party”. Journal of Latin American Studies 48: 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, E. A. and Jennings, M. K. 2010. “Exploring Multi-Issue Activism”. Political Science and Politics 43: 62–67.Google Scholar

Anderson, N. 1923. The Hobo: The Sociology of the Homeless Man. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Andrews, M. 1991. Lifetimes of Commitment: Aging, Politics, Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Artières, P. and Zancarini-Fournel, M. 2008. 68 Une histoire collective (1962–1981). Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Audier, S. 2008. La pensée anti-’68. Paris: La découverte.Google Scholar

Audrain, X. 2004. “Devenir baay-fall pour être soi: le religieux comme vecteur d’émancipation individuelle au Sénégal”. Politique africaine 94: 149–165.Google Scholar

Auld, J., Gormally, B., McEvoy, K. and Ritchie, M. 1997. Designing a System of Restorative Justice in Northern Ireland. Belfast: The Authors.Google Scholar

Auyero, J. 2003. Contentious Lives: Two Argentine Women, Two Protests, and the Quest for Recognition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Banaznak, L. A. 2010. The Women’s Movement Inside and Outside the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bargel, L. 2009. “Socialisation Politique”. In Dictionnaire des mouvements sociaux, edited by Fillieule, O., Mathieu, L. and Péchu, C. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences-Po, 510–517.Google Scholar

Barley, S. R. 1989. “Careers, Identities, and Institutions: The Legacy of the Chicago School of Sociology”. In Handbook of Career Theory, edited by Michael, A. B., Hall, D. T. and Lawrence, B. S. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baylis, T. A. 1996. “Presidents versus Prime Ministers: Shaping Executive Authority in Eastern Europe”. World Politics 48(3): 297–323.Google Scholar

Bazin, A. 2002. Les relations tchéco-allemandes depuis 1989. De la réconciliation bilatérale à l’intégration européenne. PhD Political Science, Institut d’Etudes Politiques, Paris.Google Scholar

Bean, K. 2007. The New Politics of Sinn Fein. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Bean, K. 2012. “‘New Dissidents Are but Old Provisionals Writ Large’? The Dynamics of Dissident Republicanism in the New Northern Treland”. The Political Quaterly 83: 210–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bechir, A. M. 2009. S’engager en régime autoritaire: gauchistes et islamistes dans la Tunisie indépendante. PhD Aix-Marseille III.Google Scholar

Becker, H. 1960 “Notes on the Concept of Commitment”. American Journal of Sociology 66 (1): 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, H. 1963.Outsiders, Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Becker, H. 1966. A Delinquent Boy’s Own Story, foreword to Shaw, C. The Jack Roller. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Becker, H. 1970. “The Relevance of Life Histories”. In Sociological Methods: A Source Book, edited by Denzin, N. K. Chicago: Aldine, 419–428.Google Scholar

Beckett, M., Weinstein, M., Goldman, N. and Yu-Hsuan, L. 2000. “Do Health Interview Surveys Yield Reliable Data on Chronic Illness among Older Respondents?” American Journal of Epidemiology 151L: 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckwith, K. 2016. “All Is Not Lost: The 1984–1985 British Miner’s Strike and Mobilization after Defeat”. In The Consequences of Social Movements, edited by Bosi, L., Giugni, M. and Uba, K. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41–65.Google Scholar

Bennani-Chraïbi, M. 2003. “Parcours, cercles et médiations à Casablanca”. In Résistances et protestations dans les sociétés musulmanes, edited by Bennani-Chraïbi, M. and Fillieule, O. Paris: Presses de Science Po.Google Scholar

Bennani-Chraïbi, M. 2013. “L’espace partisan marocain: un microcosme polarisé?” Revue française de science politique 63(6): 1163–1192.Google Scholar

Bennani-Chraibi, M. and Fillieule, O. (eds.). 2003. Résistances et protestations dans les sociétés musulmanes. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennani-Chraïbi, M. and Fillieule, O. 2012. “Towards a Sociology of Revolutionary Situations: Reflections on the Arab Uprisings”. Revue Française de Science Politique English 62(5–6): 767–796.Google Scholar

Bennani-Chraïbi, M. and Jeghllaly, M. 2012. “La dynamique protestataire du Mouvement du 20 février à Casablanca”. Revue française de science politique 62(5–6): 867–894.Google Scholar

Bennett, M. 1981. The Survival of a Counterculture; Ideological Work and Everyday Life among Rural Communards. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Bermeo, N. 1997. “Myths of Moderation: Confrontation and Conflict during Democratic Transitions”. Comparative Politics 29(3): 305–322.Google Scholar

Bertaux, D. (ed.). 1981. Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Bertaux, D. and Kohli, M. 1984. “The Life Story Approach: A Continental View”. Annual Review of Sociology 10: 215–237.Google Scholar

Bessière, C. 2004. “Les ‘arrangements de famille’: équité et transmission d’une exploitation familiale viticole”. Sociétés contemporaines 4(56): 69–89.Google Scholar

Beyerlein, K. and Hipp, J. R. 2006. “A Two-Stage Model for a Two-Stage Process: How Biographical Availability Matters for Social Movement Mobilization”. Mobilization 11(3): 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjørgo, T. and Horgan, J. (eds.). 2009. Leaving Terrorism Behind: Individual and Collective Disengagement. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Blee, K. M. 2008. Women of the Klan: Racism and Gender in the 1920s, with a New Preface. San Francisco: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bolos, S. 1999. La constitución de actores sociales y la política. Mexico: Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. 1999. Le Nouvel Esprit du Capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard. English Trans. 2018. The New Spirit of Capitalism, London: Pluto.Google Scholar

Bolton, J. 2012. Worlds of Dissent: Charter 77, The Plastic People of the Universe, and Czech Culture under Communism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Boschetti, A. 1985. Sartre et Les temps modernes : Une entreprise intellectuelle. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Bosi, L. 2006. “The Dynamic of Social Movement Development: Northern Ireland’s Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s”. Mobilization 11 (1): 81–100.Google Scholar

Bosi, L. 2011. “Movimenti e cambiamento sociale: l’interrelazione delle conseguenze”. Società degli Individui 42 (3): 69–78.Google Scholar

Bosi, L. 2012. “Explaining Pathways to armed Activism in the Provisional IRA, 1969–1972”. Social Science History 36 (3): 347–390.Google Scholar

Bosi, L. 2013. “Safe Territories and Political Violence: The Persistence and Disengagement of Violent Political Organizations”. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 19 (1): 80–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosi, L. 2016. “Incorporation and Democratization: The Long Term Process of Institutionalization of the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Movement”. In The Consequences of Social Movements: People, Policies and Institutions, edited by Bosi, L., Giugni, M., and Uba, K. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bosi, L. and Della Porta, D. 2012. “Micro-Mobilization Into Armed Groups: The Ideological, Instrumental and Solidaristic Paths”. Qualitative Sociology 35: 361–383.Google Scholar

Bosi, L. and Della Porta, D. 2015. “Patterns of Disengagement from Political Armed Activism: A Comparative Historical Sociology Analysis of Italy and Northern Ireland”. In Researching Terrorism, Peace and Conflict Studies: Interaction, Synthesis and Opposition, edited by Tellidis, I. and Toros, H. Abingdon: Routledge, 81–99.Google Scholar

Bosi, L. and Giugni, M. 2012. “Political Violence Outcomes: A Contentious Pol- itics Approach”. Mobilization 18(1): 85–98.Google Scholar

Bosi, L. and O’Dochartaigh, N. 2017. “Armed Activism as the Enactment of a Collective Identity: The Case of the Provisional IRA 1969–1972”. Social Movement Studies 17(1): 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosi, L. and Uba, K. 2009. “Introduction: The Outcomes of Social Movements”. Mobilization 14(4): 409–415.Google Scholar

Bosi, L., Demetriou, C., and Malthaner, S. 2014. Dynamics of Political Violence: A Process-Oriented Perspective on Radicalization and the Escalation of Political Conflict. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Bosi, L., Giugni, M., and Uba, K. (eds.). 2016. The Consequences of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bouissef Rekab, D. 1989. À l’ombre de Lalla Chafia. Casablanca: Tarik Editions.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1978. “Classement, déclassement, reclassement”. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 24: 2–22.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1979. La Distinction. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1980. Le Sens pratique. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1981. “La représentation politique: éléments pour une théorie du champ politique”. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 1981 (36–37): 3–24.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1986. “L’illusion biographique”. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 62 (1): 66–73.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 2013. Manet, Une révolution symbolique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 2015. Sociologie générale. Volume 1. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. 1964. Les Héritiers. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Bozarslan, H. 2004. Violence in the Middle East: From Political Struggle to Self-Sacrifice. Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener Publishers.Google Scholar

Bozon, M. 1987. “Histoire et sociologie d’un bien symbolique, le prénom”. Population 1: 83–98.Google Scholar

Braungart, M. M. and Braungart, R. G. 1991. “The Effects of the 1960s Political Generation on Former Left- and Right-Wing Youth Activist Leaders”. Social Problems 38 (3): 297–315.Google Scholar

Brockett, C. 2005. Political Movements and Violence in Central America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brubaker, R. and Cooper, F. 2000. “Beyond ‘Identity’”. Theory and Society 29 (1): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bugajski, J. and Pollack, M. 1989. East European Fault Lines: Dissent, Opposition and Social Activism. San Francisco and London: Boulder, Westview Press.Google Scholar

Burgat, F. 1988. L’islamisme au Maghreb. Paris: Payot, La voix du Sud.Google Scholar

Camau, M. and Massardier, G. 2009. Démocracies et Autoritarismes: fragmentation et hybridation des régimes. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar

Camou, A. 2001. Los desafíos de la gobernabilidad. Mexico: FLACSO, IIS-UNAM and Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar

Cardi, C. 2010. “Les mauvaises mères entre prison, justice et travail social”. In Reproduire le genre, edited by Dorlin, E. and Fassin, E. Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou.Google Scholar

Cardi, C. and Pruvost, G. 2012. “Penser la violence des femmes: enjeux politiques et épistémologiques”. In Penser la violence des femmes, edited by Cardi, C. and Pruvost, G. Paris: La Découverte: 13–64.Google Scholar

Carnac, R. 2014. “L’Église catholique contre ‘la théorie du genre’ : Construction d’un objet polémique dans le débat public français contemporain”. Synergies Italie 10: 125–143.Google Scholar

Carothers, T. 2004. Critical Mission: Essays on Democracy Promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie, Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar

Cassady, K. 2005. “Organic Intellectuals and the Committed Community: Irish Republicanism and Sinn Féin in the North”. Irish Political Studies 20 (3): 341–356.Google Scholar

Catusse, M. 2002. “Le charme discret de la société civile: Ressorts politiques de la formation d’un groupe dans le Maroc ‘ajusté’”. Revue internationale de politique compare 2: 297–318.Google Scholar

Catusse, M. 2008. Le temps des entrepreneurs. Politique et transformations du capitalisme au Maroc. Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose.Google Scholar

Catusse, M. and Vairel, F. 2010. “Le Maroc de Mohammed VI: mobilisations et action publique”. Politique africaine 120: 5–23.Google Scholar

Cefaï, D., Carrel, M., Talpin, J., Eliasoph, N., and Lichterman, P. 2012. “Ethnographies de la participation”. Participations 4: 7–48.Google Scholar

Chabanet, D. and Guigni, M. 2010. “Les conséquences des mouvements sociaux”. In Penser les mouvements sociaux. Conflits sociaux et contestations dans les sociétés contemporaines, edited by Fillieule, O., Agrikoliansky, E., and Sommier, I.. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Chambergeat, P. 1965. “Bilan de l’expérience parlementaire marocaine”. Annuaire de l’Afrique du Nord IV: 101–116.Google Scholar

Champy, F., Israël, L. 2009. “Professions et engagement public”. Sociétés contemporaines 1(73): 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chauvel, L. 2002. Le Destin des générations. Structure sociale et cohortes en France au XXe siècle. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Cheynis, E., 2013. “Les reconversions dans l’associatif de militants politiques marocains. Ruptures, continuités et fidélité à soi”. Politix 2 (102):147–173.Google Scholar

Cheynis, E., 2008. L’espace des transformations de l’action associative au Maroc. Réforme de l’action publique, investissements militants et légitimation internationale. PhD Social Sciences, University Paris I- Panthéon-Sorbonne, 2008.Google Scholar

Cigerli, S. and Le Saout, D. 2005. Öcalan et le PKK: Les mutations de la question kurde. Paris: Maisonneuve & Larose.Google Scholar

Collovald, A. 1989. “Les poujadistes, ou l’échec en politique”. Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine 36 (1): 113–165.Google Scholar

Collovald, A. and Neveu, E. 2001. “Le néo-polar: du gauchisme politique au gauchisme littéraire”. Sociétés et Représentations 11: 77–93.Google Scholar

Combes, H. 2011. Faire parti. Trajectoires de gauche au Mexique. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar

Combes, H. 2012. “Tomar partido: sociología de los asistentes y militantes en los cierres de campaña”. In Apropiación Política del Espacio Público. Miradas Etnográficas de los Cierres de las Campañas Electorales del 2006, edited by Tamayo, S. and López-Saavedra, N. Mexico: IFE and UAM, 201–232.Google Scholar

Combes, H. and Fillieule, O. 2011. “Repression and Protest Structural Models and Strategic Interactions”. Revue française de science politique (English) 61 (6): 1–24.Google Scholar

Coninck, F. de and Godard, F. 1989. “Introduction”. In Biographie et cycles de vie, edited by Coninck, F. de &and Godard, F. Enquête (5). EHESS/CNRS/Université de Nice, 1–5.Google Scholar

Cormier, P. 2016. Les conséquences biographiques de l’engagement en contexte répressif. Militer au sein la gauche radicale en Turquie: 1974. PhD in Political Science, University of Lausanne and Institute for Political Studies, Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Corrigall-Brown, C. 2011. Patterns of Protest: Trajectories of Participation in Social Movements. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Corrigall-Brown, C. 2012. “From the Balconies to the Barricades, and Back? Trajectories of Participation in Contentious Politics”. Journal of Civil Society 8 (1): 17–38.Google Scholar

Coser, L., 1974. Greedy Institutions: Patterns of Undivided Commitment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Cress, D. M., Miller, J. and McPherson, T. R. 1997. “Competition and Commitment in Voluntary Memberships: The Paradox of Persistence and Participation”. Sociological Perspectives 40 (1): 61–79.Google Scholar

Crouch, C. 2004. Post-Democracy. Polity: London.Google Scholar

Crozier, M., Huntington, S., and Watanuki, J. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar

Da, B. 1999. The Velvet Philosophers. London: The Claridge Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J. 2008. The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation Is Reshaping American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J., Van Sickle, A., and Weldon, S. 2010. “The Individual-Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 51–73.Google Scholar

Dammame, D., Gobille, B., Matonti, F., and Pudal, B. 2008. Mai-Juin ’68. Paris: Editions de l’atelier.Google Scholar

Darmon, M. 2009. “The Fifth Element: Social Class and the Sociology of Anorexia”. Sociology 43 (4): 717–733.Google Scholar

Dauvin, P. and Siméant, J. 2002. Le travail humanitaire. Les acteurs des ONG, du siège au terrain. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Davis, D. E. 1997. “New Social Movements, Old Party Structures: Discursive and Organizational Transformations in Mexican and Brazilian Party Politics”. In Politics, Social Change and Economic Restructuring in Latin America, edited by Smith, W. C. and Korzeniewicz, R. B. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 151–187.Google Scholar

Della Porta, D. 1995. Social Movements, Political Violence and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Della Porta, D. 2009. “Leaving Underground Organizations: A Sociological Analysis of the Italian Case”. In Leaving Terrorism Behind: Individual and Collective Disengagement, edited by Björgo, T. and Horgan, J. London: Routledge, 67–87.Google Scholar

Della Porta, D. (ed.). 2014. Mobilizing for Democracy. Comparing 1989 and 2011. Oxford: Oxford Universiy Press.Google Scholar

DeMartni, J. R. 1983. “Social Movement Participation: Political Socialization, Generation Consciousness, and Lasting Effects”. Youth and Society 15: 195–223.Google Scholar

Demerath, N. J. III, Marwell, G., and Aiken, M. T. 1971. Dynamics of Idealism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc Publishers.Google Scholar

Descamps, F. 2001. L’historien, l’archiviste et le magnétophone. De la constitution de la source orale à son exploitation. Paris: Comité pour l’histoire économique et financière-Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie.Google Scholar

Dillenburger, K., Montserrat, F., and Rym, A. 2008. “Long Term Effects of Political Violence: Narrative Inquiry across a 20-Year Period”. Qualitative Health Research 18 (10): 1312–1322.Google Scholar

Dobry, M. 2000. “Les voies incertaines de la transitologie: choix stratégiques, séquences historiques, bifurcations et processus de path dependence”. Revue française de science politique 50 (4–5): 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobry, M. 2009 (1984). Sociologie des crises politiques. Paris: Presses de la FNSP.Google Scholar

Dormoy-Rajramanan, C., Gobille, B., and Neveu, E. 2018. Mai 68 par celles et ceux qui l’ont vécu. Paris: Editions de l’Atelier.Google Scholar

Downton, J. Jr. and Wehr, P. 1997. The Persistent Activist: How Peace Commitment Develops and Survives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Dressen, M. 2000. De l’amphi à l’établi. Les étudiants maoïstes à l’usine (1967–1989). Paris: Belin.Google Scholar

Duboc, M. 2010. “Egyptian Leftist Intellectuals’ Activism from the Margins. Overcoming the Mobilization/Demobilization Dichotomy”. In Social Movements, Mobilization, and Contestation in the Middle East and North Africa, edited by Beinin, J. and Vairel, F. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 61–79.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. 1974 (1902). L’éducation Morale. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Dvorakova, V. and Kunc, J. 1996. “Zrod ceskeho stranickeho system”. In Krystalizace struktury politickych stran v Ceske republice po roce 1989, edited by Dvorakova, V. and Gerloch, A. Prague: Ceska Spolecnost pro Politicke Vedy.Google Scholar

Dwyer, C. and Shadd, M. 2011. “The Role of Self-Help Efforts in the Reintegration of ‘Politically Motivated’ Former Prisoners: Implications from the Northern Irish Experience”. Crime, Law and Social Change 55: 293–309.Google Scholar

Einwohner, R. L. 2003. “Opportunity, Honor, and Action in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of 1943”. American Journal of Sociology 109 (3): 650–675.Google Scholar

Einwohner, R., Hollander, K., and Olson, T. 2000. “Engendering Social Movements, Cultural Images and Movement dynamics”. Gender and Society 124 (5): 679–699.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, H. 1996. Inside Agitators. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Ekiert, G. and Kubik, J. 1999. Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland, 1989–1993. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

El Ayadi, M. 2004. “Entre l’Islam et l’islamisme, la religion dans l’école publique marocaine”. Revue internationale d’Education de Sèvres 36: 111–121.Google Scholar

El Ayadi, M., Rachik, H., and Tozy, M. 2013. L’Islam au quotidien. Enquête sur les valeurs et les pratiques religieuses eu Maroc. Casablanca: Éditions la Croisée des Chemins.Google Scholar

El Khawaga, D. 2003. “La génération seventies en Egypte. La société civile comme répertoire d’action alternative”. In Résistance et protestations dans les sociétés musulmanes, edited by Bennani-Chraïbi, M. and Fillieule, O. Paris: Sciences Po, 271–292.Google Scholar

Elias, N. 1969. The Civilizing Process: Vol.I, The History of Manners. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Elias, N. 1982. The Civilizing Process: Vol.II, State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Elias, N. 1984. What Is Sociology? New-York: Columbia University.Google Scholar

Elias, N. 1991. The Society of Individuals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Elias, N. 2010. Mozart, and Other Essays on Courtly Culture. Dublin: UCD Press.Google Scholar

Eliasoph, N. and Lichterman, P. 2003. “Culture in Interaction”. American Journal of Sociology 108 (4): 735–794.Google Scholar

Ercan, H. 2010. Dynamics of Mobilization and Radicalization of the Kurdish Movement in the 1970s in Turkey, nonpublished thesis, Koç University.Google Scholar

Eriksson, A. 2008. “Challenging Cultures of Violence through Community Restorative Justice in Northern Ireland”. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance 11: 231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falquet, J. 2003. “Division sexuelle du travail révolutionnaire: réflexions à partir de la participation des femmes salvadoriennes à la lutte armée (1981–1992)”. Cahiers d’Amérique Latine 40: 109–128.Google Scholar

Fejtö, F. and Rupnik, J. eds. 1999. Le printemps tchécoslovaque 1968. Brussels: Editions Complexe.Google Scholar

Fendrich, J. and Lovoy, K. 1988. “Back to the Future: Adult Political Behavior of Former Student Activists”. American Sociological Review 53:780–794.Google Scholar

Fendrich, J. M. 1977. “Keeping the Faith or Pursuing the Good Life: A Study of the Consequences of Participation in the Civil Rights Movement”. American Sociological Review 42: 144–157.Google Scholar

Fendrich, J. M. 1993. Ideal Citizens: The Legacy of the Civil Rights Movement. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Ferguson, J. 2013. “Declarations of Dependence: Labour, Personhood, and Welfare in Southern Africa”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19: 223–242.Google Scholar

Ferguson, N. 2014. “Northern Irish Ex-Prisoners: The Impact of Imprisonment on Prisoners and the Peace Process in Northern Ireland”. In Prisons, Terrorism and Extremism: Critical issues in Management, Radicalisation and Reform, edited by Silke, A. New York: Routledge, 270–283.Google Scholar

Ferry, L. and Renaud, A. 1985. La pensée '68. Essai sur l’anti-humanisme contemporain. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. 1997. Stratégies de la rue. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. 2001. “Propositions pour une analyse processuelle de l’engagement individuel”. Revue française de science politique 51 (1–2): 199–215.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. 2005. “Temps biographique, temps social et variabilités des retributions”. In Le désengagement militant, edited by Fillieule, O. Paris: Belin, 17–47.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. (ed). 2005. Le désengagement militant, Paris: Belin.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. 2009. “Conséquences biographiques de l’engagement”. In Dictionnaire des mouvements sociaux, edited by Fillieule, O. et al. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fillieule, O. 2010. “Some Elements of an Interactionist Approach to Political Disengagement.” Social Movement Studies 9 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. 2013a “Political Socialization and Social Movements”. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by Snow, D. A., Della Porta, D., Klandermans, B., and McAdam, D. Oxford: Blackwell, 968–974.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. 2013b. “Some thoughts on student circles in demobilization dynamics”. European Journal of Turkish Studies (17) [Online].Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. 2015. “Disengagement from Radical Organizations: A Process and Multi Level Model of Analysis”. In Movements in Times of Transition, edited by Klandermans, B. and van Stralen, C. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 34–63.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. 2016. “Demobilization and Disengagement in a Life Course Perspective”. In Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, edited by Della Porta, D. and Diani, M. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. and Bennani-Chraïbi, M. 2005. “Exit, Voice, Loyalty et bien d’autres choses encore…”. In Résistances et protestations dans les societés musulmanes, edited by Fillieule, O. and Bennani- Chraïbi, M. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 43–126.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. and Mayer, N. 2001. “Introduction : Dossier ‘Devenirs militants’”. Revue française de science politique 51 (1–2):19–25.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O. and Sommier, I. (eds.). 2018. Marseille, années 68. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O., Agrikoliansky, E., and Sommier, I. 2010. Penser les mouvements sociaux. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Fillieule, O., Béroud, S., Masclet, C., Sommier, I., and Sombrero, Collectif. 2018. Changer le monde, changer sa vie. Enquête sur les militantes et les militants des années 68 en France. Arles: Actes-Sud.Google Scholar

Flacks, R. 1988. Making History: The American Left and the American Mind. Columbia, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Fleischer, D. 2004. “Reforma política en Brasil: una historia sin fin”. America Latina Hoy 37: 81–99.Google Scholar

Flesher-Fominaya, C. 2010. “Collective Identity in Social Movements: Central Concepts and Debates”. Sociology Compass 4 (6): 393–404.Google Scholar

Fligstein, N. and McAdam, D. 2012. A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Foryś, G. 2008. Dynamika sporu: protesty rolników w III Rzeczpospolitej. Warsaw: WN Scholar.Google Scholar

Foryś, G. and Krzysztof, G. 2002. “The Dynamics of Polish Peasants Protests under Post-Communism”. Eastern European Countryside 8: 47–65.Google Scholar

Foster, P. 2000. “Inside Story of the Maze, a Jail like No Other”. The Daily Telegraph July, 28.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1976. La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Frampton, M. 2011. Legion of Rearguard: Dissident Irish Republicanism. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.Google Scholar

Freymond, N. 2010. “La ‘redécouverte’ des institutions par les sociologies”. In Sociologie de l’institution, edited by Lagroye, J. and Offerlé, M. Paris: Belin, 33–53.Google Scholar

Frye, B. 2011. “A Death With Several Causes, and Uses”. Transitions Online 8–9: 1–2. Accessed February 23, 2015. http://eastofcenter.tol.org/2011/08/a-death-with-several-causes-and-uses/.Google Scholar

Fuchs-Ebaugh, Helen R. 1988. Becoming an Ex: The Process of Role Exit. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Gamson, W. 1985. The Strategy of Social protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar

Gamson, W. 1998. “Social Movements and Cultural Change”. In From Contention to Democracy, edited by Giugni, M., McAdam, D., and Tilly, C. Boston: Rowman and Littlefield, 57–77.Google Scholar

Garibay, D. 2005. “De la lutte armée à la lutte électorale, itinéraires divergents d’une trajectoire insolite”. Revue internationale de politique comparée 12 (3): 283–297.Google Scholar

Gaxie, D. 1977. “Economie des partis et rétributions du militantisme”. Revue française de science politique 27 (1): 123–154.Google Scholar

Gaxie, D. 2005. “Rétributions du militantisme et paradoxes de l'action collective”. Swiss Political Science Review 11 (1): 157–188.Google Scholar

Gayer, L. 2012. “Liberation and Containment: The Ambivalent Empowerment of Sikh Female Fighters”. Pôle Sud 36: 49–65.Google Scholar

Gayer, L. 2013. “‘Love-Marriage-Sex’ in the People’s Liberation Army of Nepal: The Libidinal Economy of a Greedy Institution”. In Revolution in Nepal: An Anthropological and Historical Approach to the People’s War, edited by Lecomte-Tilouine, M. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 333–366.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. 1974. “‘From the Native’s Point of View’”: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding”. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28 (1): 26–45.Google Scholar

Geisser, V., Karam, K., and Vairel, F. 2006. “Espaces du politique : Mobilisations et protestations”. In La politique dans le monde arabe, edited by Picard, E. Paris: Armand Colin, 193–213.Google Scholar

Genro, T. et al. 1999. Governo e Cidadania: Balanço e reflexões sobre o modo petista de governar. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo.Google Scholar

Gerth, H. and Mills, C. W. 1954. Character and Social Structure: The Psychology of Social Institutions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Gitlin, T. 1987. The 60s: Years of Hope, Days of rage. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar

Giugni, M. 1980. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making & Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Giugni, M. 1998. “Was it Worth the Effort ? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements”. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 371–393.Google Scholar

Giugni, M. 2004. “Personal and Biographical Consequences”. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements MA, edited by Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., and Kriesi, H. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 412–432.Google Scholar

Giugni, M. 2008. “Political, Biographical and Cultural Consequences of Social Movements”. Sociology Compass 2 (5): 1582–1600.Google Scholar

Giugni, M. 2013.”Biographical Consequences of Activism”. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by Snow, D., Della Porta, D., Klandermans, B., and McAdam, D. Oxford: Blackwell, 138–144.Google Scholar

Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. 1971. Status Passage. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine transaction.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1991 (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Goirand, C. 2010. “Penser les mouvements sociaux d’Amérique latine: Les approches des mobilisations depuis les années 1970”. Revue française de science politique 60 (3): 445–466.Google Scholar

Goirand, C. 2014. “The Worker’s Party, from Contention to Public Action: A Case of Institutionalization”. Journal of Politics in Latin America 6 (3): 95–127.Google Scholar

Goldstone, J. (ed). 2003. States, Parties and Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goldstone, J. and McAdam, D. 2001. “Contention in Demographic and Life-Course Context”. In Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, edited by Aminzade, R., Goldstone, J., McAdam, D., Perry, E., Sewell, W.H. Jr., Tarrow, S. and Tilly, C. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 195–221.Google Scholar

Goldstone, J. and Useem, B. 1999. “Prison Riots and Microrevolutions: An Extension of State-Centered Theories of Revolution”. American Journal of Sociology 104 (4): 985–1029.Google Scholar

Goodwin, J. 2001. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. M. 1999. “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory”. Sociological Forum 14 (1): 27–54.Google Scholar

Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. M. 2003. “What Do Movement Participants Think and Feel?”. In The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, edited by Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. M. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 131–133.Google Scholar

Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. (eds). 2004. Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning and Emotions. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., and Polleta, F. 2007. “Emotional Dimensions of Social Movements”. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., and Kriesi, H. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 413–432.Google Scholar

Gordon, C. 1991. “Governmental Rationality: An Introduction”. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P. Hampstead: Harvester, 1–52.Google Scholar

Gottraux, P. 1997. Socialisme et Barbarie : Un engagement politique et intellectuel dans la France de l’après guerre. Lausanne: Payot.Google Scholar

Grémion, P. 1984. Paris-Prague : La gauche face au renouveau et à la régression tchécoslovaques. Paris: Julliard.Google Scholar

Grojean, O. 2013. “Comment gérer une crise politique interne? Façonnage organisationnel du militantisme, maintien de l’engagement et trajectoires de défection”. Politix 102: 63–87.Google Scholar

Gruel, L. 2004. La rébellion de '68 : Une relecture sociologique. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar

Gunder Frank, A. and Fuentes, M. 1995. “El estudios de los ciclos en los movimientos sociales”. Sociológica 10 (28): 37–60.Google Scholar

Gündogan, A. Z. 2011. “Space, State-Making and Contentious Kurdish Politics in the East of Turkey: The Case of Eastern Meetings, 1967”. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 13 (4): 389–416.Google Scholar

Gurin, P. and Epps, E. 1975. Black Consciousness, Identity and Achievement. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Gwiazda, A. 2008. “The Parliamentary Election in Poland, October 2007”. Electoral Studies 27 (4): 760–764.Google Scholar

Hadjiisky, M. 2001. “The Failure of Participatory Democracy in the Czech Republic”. West European Politics 24 (3): 43–64.Google Scholar

Hadjiisky, M. 2004. De la mobilisation citoyenne à la démocratie de partis. Participation et délégation politiques dans la nouvelle démocratie tchèque (1989–1996). PhD, Political Science, Institut d’Etudes Politiques, Paris.Google Scholar

Hadjiisky, M. 2005. “Des leaders ‘sans parti’ : Engagement résistant et désengagement dirigeant: les anciens dissidents en République tchèque”. In Les frontières du politique, edited by Arnaud, L. and Guionnet, C. Rennes: PUR.Google Scholar

Hadjiisky, M. 2007. “La culture ‘civique’ en Pays tchèques : Généalogie d’une référence politique”. In Cultures et pratiques participatives : Perspectives comparatives, edited by Neveu, C. Paris: L’Harmattan, 331–351.Google Scholar

Hafez, M. M. 2003. Why Muslims Rebel: Repression and Resistance in the Islamic World. London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R. 1997. “La science politique et les trois néo-institutionnalismes”. Revue française de science politique 47 (3): 469–496.Google Scholar

Hamon, H. and Rotman, P. 1987, 1988. Génération. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Hanley, S., Szczerbiak, A., Haughton, T., and Fowler, B. 2008. “Sticking Together: Explaining Comparative Centre – Right Party Success in Post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe”. Party Politics 14 (4): 407–434.Google Scholar

Hastings, M. 2001. “Partis et administration du sens”. In Les partis politiques, quelles perspectives ? edited by Andolfatto, D., Greffet, F., and Olivier, L. Paris: L’Harmattan, 21–36.Google Scholar

Havel, V. 1989. Dalkovy vyslech. Rozhovor s Karlem Hvizd’alou [Remote Questionning. Interview with Karel Hvizd’ala]. Prague: Melantrich.Google Scholar

Havryshko, M. 2016. “Illegitimate Sexual Practices in the OUN Underground and UPA in Western Ukraine in the 1940s and 1950s”. The Journal of Power Institutions in Post-Soviet Societies 17 [https://pipss.revues.org/4214].Google Scholar

Hay, C. 2004. Why We Hate Politics. London: Polity.Google Scholar

Heaney, M. and Rojas, F. 2007. “Partisans, Non-partisans, and the Antiwar Movement in the United States”. American Politics Research 35 (4): 431–464.Google Scholar

Hélardot, V. 2010. “Vouloir ce qui arrive? Les bifurcations biographiques entre logiques structurelles et choix individuels”. In Bifurcations : Les sciences sociales face aux ruptures et à l’événement, edited by Bessin, M., Bidart, C., and Grossetti, M. Paris: La Découverte: 160–175.Google Scholar

Hercus, C. 1999. “Identity, Emotions and Feminist Collective Action”. Gender and Society 13 (1): 34–55.Google Scholar

Hermanova, E., Illner, M., and Vajdova, Z. 1992. “Politicke jaro 1990 na venkove a v malem meste” [Political Sping 1990 in countryside and small cities]. Sociologicky casopis/Sociological Review 28 (3): 369–385.Google Scholar

Heurtaux, J. 2004. “Démocratie populaire versus Démocratie élitaire: les inégalités politiques et leurs justifications en Pologne”. La Nouvelle Alternative 62 (19): 39–50.Google Scholar

Heurtaux, J. 2005. Une partisanisation controversée. Codification de la compétition politique et construction de la Démocratie en Pologne (1989–2001). PhD Political Science, University Lille 2.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. L. 1990. “Sacrifice for the Cause: Group Processes, Recruitment, and Commitment in a Student Social Movement.” American Sociological Review 55: 243–254.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. L. 2003. “Generating Commitment among Students”. In The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, edited by Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. M. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 94–102.Google Scholar

Hivert, J., 2013. “Se désengager du mouvement du ‘20 février’: le cas des étudiants du supérieur de la coordination de Rabat”. European Journal of Turkish Studies 17: 1–24.Google Scholar

Horgan, J. 2009. Walking Away from Terrorism: Accounts of Disengagement from Radical and Extremist Movements. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Howard, M. M. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Humphreys, M. and Weinstein, J.M. 2007. “Demobilization and Reintegration”. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (4): 531–567.Google Scholar

Hunter, W. 2010. The Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil, 1989–2009. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hunter, W. and Power, T. 2007. “Rewarding Lula: The Brazilian Election of 2006”. Latin American Politics and Society 49 (1): 1–30.Google Scholar

Imset, I. G. 1996. “The PKK Terrorist or Freedom Fighters?”. The International Journal of Kurdish Studies 10 (1/2): 45–100.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. 2008. “Changing Values in Post-Industrial Societies”. In The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, edited by Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. M. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Jaffrelot, C. 2000. Habermas (Jürgen). Après l’État-nation. Une nouvelle constellation politique. Paris: Critique Internationale, Presses de sciences po: 74–75.Google Scholar

James, W. 1902. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature [Online: https://csrs.nd.edu/assets/59930/williams_1902.pdf].Google Scholar

Jasiewicz, K. 1992. “From Solidarity to Fragmentation”. Journal of Democracy 3 (2): 55–69.Google Scholar

Jasper, J. 1997. The Art of Moral Protest. Culture, Biography and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Jasper, J. 2006. Getting Your Way: Strategic Dilemnas in the Real World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jasper, J. 2008 (2003). “The Emotions of Protest”. In The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, edited by Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. M. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing: 153–162.Google Scholar

Jasper, J. and Duyvendack, J. W. (eds.). 2015. Players and Arena: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Jennings, M. K. 1981. Generations and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Jennings, K. 1987. “Residues of a Movement: The Aging of the American Protest Generation”. American Political Science Review 81 (2): 367–382.Google Scholar

Jennings, M. K. 2002. “Generation Units and the Student Protest Movement in the United States: An Intra and Intergenerational Analysis”. Political Psychology 23: 303–324.Google Scholar

Jennings, M. K. 2004. Youth-Parent Socialization Panel Study, 1965–1997: Youth Wave IV, 1997. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Jennings, M. K. and Niemi, R. G. 1968. “The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child”. American Political Science Review 62 (1): 169–184.Google Scholar

Jennings, M. K. and Stoker, L. 2004. “Social Trust and Civic Engagement across Time and Generations”. Acta Politica 39 (4): 342–379.Google Scholar

Johnston, H. 2012. “Age Cohorts, Cognition and Collective Violence”. In Violent Protest, Contentious Politics, and the Neoliberal State, edited by Seferiades, S. and Johnston, H. Farnham: Ashgate: 39–54.Google Scholar

Johsua, F. 2016. Anticapitalistes. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Jongerden, J. and Akkaya, A. H. 2011. “Born from the Left. The Making of the PKK”. In Nationalisms and Politics and the Kurdish Issue, edited by Casier, M. and Jongerden, J. London: Routledge: 123–162.Google Scholar

Juhem, P. 2009. “Effets de Génération”. In Dictionnaire des mouvements sociaux, edited by Fillieule, O., Mathieu, L., and Péchu, C. Paris: Presses de SciencesPo, 188–197.Google Scholar

Kabacali, A. 1992. Türkiye’de Gençlik Hareketli. Istanbul: Altin.Google Scholar

Kącki, M. 2013. Lepperiada. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Czarne.Google Scholar

Kaçmazoglu, B. 1995. Türkiye’de Siyasal Fikir Hareketleri. Istanbul: Birey.Google Scholar

Kampwirth, K. 2002. Women and Guerilla Movements: Nicaragua, El Salvador, Chiapas, Cuba. University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Kapferer, B. 2015. “Introduction: In the Event: Toward an Anthropology of Generic Moments.” In In the Event: Toward an Anthropology of Generic Moments, edited by Meinert, L. and Kapferer, B. New York, London: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, M. F. 1998. “Stepsisters: Feminist Movement Activism in Different Institutional Spaces”. In The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century, editedy by Meyer, D. S. and Tarrow, S. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield: 195–216.Google Scholar

Kaur, S. 2004. Bikhra Painda (Punjabi) (The Scattered Road). Amritsar: Azad Khalsa Prakhashan.Google Scholar

Keck, M. E. 1991. A lógica da diferença. O Partido dos Trabalhadores na construção da democracia brasileira, São Paulo: Atica.Google Scholar

Keniston, K. 1968. Young Radicals. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar

Kevlihan, R. 2013. Aid, Insurgencies and Conflict Transformation, When Greed is Good. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Khawaja, M. 1993. “Repression and Popular Collective Action: Evidence from the West Bank”. Sociological Forum 8 (1): 47–71.Google Scholar

Killian, L. M. 1973. “Social Movements: A Review of the Field”. In Social Movements: A Reader and a Source Book, edited by Evans, R. R. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Kinzo, M. D. 2004. “Partidos, eleições e democracia no Brasil pós-1985”. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais 19 (54): 23–40.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, H. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structure and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies”. British Journal of Political Science: 57–85.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, H. 1993. “Social Movements, Political Parties and Democratic Theory”. ANNALS AAPSS 528: 13–29.Google Scholar

Klandermans, B. 1997. The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Klandermans, B. 2003. “Disengaging from Movements”. In The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, edited by Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. M. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 116–127.Google Scholar

Klandermans, B. and Van Stralen, C. 2015. Movements in Times of Democratic Transition. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Klatch, R. E. 1999. A Generation Divided: The New Left, the New Right, and the 1960s. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Klawiter, M. 2008. The Biopolitics of Breast Cancer. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Knight, M. and Ozerdem, A. 2004. “Guns, Camps and Cash: Disarmament, Demobilization and Reinsertion of Former Combatants in Transitions from War to Peace”. Journal of Peace Research 41: 449–516.Google Scholar

Konx, C. and Monaghan, R. 2002. Informal Justice in Divided Societies: Northern Ireland and South Africa. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kopecek, M. 2011. “Disent jako minulost, liberalismus jako projekt: Obcanske hnuti-Svobodni demokrate v ceske polistopadove politice” [Dissidence as a Past, Liberalism as a Project: The Civic Movement-Free Democrats in Post-November Politics]. In Gjuricova, A., Kopecek, M., Roubal, P., Suk, J., and Zahradnicek, T. Rozdeleni minulosti [Division of the Past]. Prague: KVH: 61–106.Google Scholar

Kriesi, H. 1993. Political Mobilization and Social Change: The Dutch Case in Comparative Perspective, Brookfield, VT: Avebury.Google Scholar

Krok-Paszkowska, A. 2003. “Samoobrona: The Polish Self-Defence Movement”. In Uncivil Society? Contentious Politics in Post- Communist Europe, edited by Mudde, C. and Kopecky, P. London: Routledge, 114–133.Google Scholar

Kroupa, D. 1996. Svoboda a rad [Liberty and Order]. Prague: Éós.Google Scholar

Krzyżanowska, N. 2010. “Denying the Right to Speak in Public: Sexist and Homophobic Discourses in Post-1989 Poland.” In The Post-Communist Condition: Public and Private Discourses of Transformation, edited by Galasińska, A. and Galasiński, D. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 105–130.Google Scholar

Kumar, P., Dagar, R., and Neerja, . 1999. Victims of Militancy. Chandigarh: Institute of Development and Communication.Google Scholar

Kusin, V. 2002 (1971). The Intellectual Origins of the Prague Spring: The Development of Reformist Ideas in Czechoslovakia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

La Garza, E., Ejea, T., and Macias, L. 1986. El otro movimiento estudiantil. Mexico: Contemporáneos.Google Scholar

Laâbi, A. 2001. Les rêves sont têtus. Écrits politiques. Casablanca: EDDIF et Paris-Méditerranée.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. 2003 (2000). “Identidad y Hegemonía: el rol de la universalidad en la construcción de lógicas políticas”. In Contingencia, Hegemonía, Universalidad. Diálogos Contemporáneos en la Izquierda, edited by Butler, J., Laclau, E., and Zizek, S. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica: 49–94.Google Scholar

Lacroix, B. 1981. L’utopie communautaire. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Lagroye, J. and Offerlé, M. (eds.). 2010. Sociologie de l’institution. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar

Lahire, B. 2010. Franz Kafka. Éléments pour une théorie de la création littéraire. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Lahire, B. 2007. L’homme pluriel: les ressorts de l’action. Paris: Hachette Littératures.Google Scholar

Langlois, C.-V. and Seignobos, C. (1898). Introduction aux études historiques, Livre II, Opérations analytiques. Lyon: ENS.Google Scholar

Lanzona, V. A. 2009. Amazons of the Huk Rebellion: Gender, Sex, and Revolution in the Philippines. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Latté, S. 2015. “Le choix des larmes. La commémoration comme mode de protestation”. Politix 110: 7–34.Google Scholar

Leclercq, C. and Pagis, J. 2011. “Les incidences biographiques de l’engagement. Socialisations militantes et mobilité sociale. Introduction”. Sociétés contemporaines 4 (84): 5–23.Google Scholar

Lee, A.-R. 1997. “Exploration of the Sources of Student Activism: The Case of South Korea”. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 9: 48–65.Google Scholar

Lepper, A. 1993. Samoobrona. Dlaczego? Przed czym. Warsaw: Kamea.Google Scholar

Lepper, A. 1999. Niepokorny. Warsaw: Kamea.Google Scholar

Lewis, O. 1961. The Children of Sanchez: Autobiography of a Mexican Family. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Lindberg, S. 2009; Democratization by Elections. A New Mode of transition? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Lindendberg, D. 1975. Le Marxisme Introuvable. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar

Lipsitz, G. 1988. A life in Struggle: Ivory Perry and the Culture of Opposition. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Louault, F. 2006. “Coups et coûts d’un échec électoral : La défaite du Parti des Travailleurs à Porto Alegre (octobre 2004)”. Lusotopie 13 (2): 73–90.Google Scholar

Loveman, M. 1998. “High Risk Collective Action: Defending Human Rights in Chile, Uruguay, and Argentina”. American Journal of Sociology 104 (2): 477–525.Google Scholar

Lucardie, P. 2000. “Prophets, Purifiers and Prolocutors. Towards a Theory on the Emergence of New Parties”. Party Politics 6 (2): 175–185.Google Scholar

Luck, S. and Dechezelles, S. 2011. Voix de la rue ou voie des urnes? Mouvements sociaux et partis politiques. Rennes: PUR.Google Scholar

Luker, K. 2003. “World Views of Pro- and Anti-Abortion Activists”. In The Social Movements Reader. Cases and Concepts, edited by Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. M. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 134–146.Google Scholar

MacIonnrachtaigh, F. 2013. Language, Resistance and Revival: Republican Prisoners and the Irish Language in The North of Ireland. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Mannheim, K. 1952 (1928). The Problem of Generations in Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan, 276–332.Google Scholar

Marès, A. 1995. Histoire des Pays tchèques et slovaques. Paris: Hatier.Google Scholar

Markowski, R. 2008. “The 2007 Polish Parliamentary Election: Some Structuring, Still a Lot of Chaos”. West European Politics 31 (5): 1055–1068.Google Scholar

Markus, G. B. 1986. “Stability and Change in Political Attitudes: Observed, Recalled, and ‘Explained’”. Political Behavior 8: 21–44.Google Scholar

Martínez Cruz, J., Quintanilla, J., Hernández, A., and Melchor, J. 2002. Desde abajo. La izquierda y los movimientos sociales en Morelos. Mexico: Convergencia Socialista.Google Scholar

Marwell, G. A. and Demerath, J. 1987. “The Persistance of Political Attitudes among 1960’s Civil Rights Activists”. Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 359–375.Google Scholar

Masclet, C. 2015. “Le féminisme en héritage? Enfants de militantes de la deuxième vague”. Politix 1 (109): 45–68.Google Scholar

Masclet, C. 2016. “Examining the Intergenerational Outcomes of Social Movements: The Case of Feminist Activists and Their Children”. In The Consequences of Social Movements, edited by Bosi, L., Giugni, M., and Uba, K. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 106–129.Google Scholar

Massicard, E. 2010. “Répression et changement des formes de militantisme: carrières de remobilisation à gauche après 1980 en Turquie”. Sociétés politiques compares 28: 1–18.Google Scholar

Mastropaolo, A. 2012. Is Democracy a Lost Cause? Paradoxes of an Imperfect Invention. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Mauger, G. 1994. “Gauchisme, Contre Culture et Néo-Libéralisme: Pour une histoire de la génération de mai '68”. In L’Identité Politique, CURAPP. Paris: PUF, 206–226.Google Scholar

Mauger, G. 2006. L’émeute de novembre 2005 : Une révolte proto-politique. Bellecombes en Bauges: Editions du Croquant.Google Scholar

Maurel, M.-C. 1994. “La naissance des nouveaux acteurs sociaux sur la scène locale”. Revue d’Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest 4: 131–145.Google Scholar

Mayer, F. 2004. Les Tchèques et leur communisme: Mémoire et identités politiques. Paris: Editions de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar

McAdam, D. 1986. “Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer”. The American Journal of Sociology 92 (1): 64–90.Google Scholar

McAdam, D. 1988. Freedom Summer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McAdam, D. 1989. “The Biographical Consequences of Activism”. American Sociological Review 54 (5): 744–760.Google Scholar

McAdam, D. 1999. “The Biographical Impact of Activism”. In How Social Movements Matter: Theoretical and Comparative Studies on the Consequences of Social Movements, edited by Giugni, M., McAdam, D., and Tilly, C. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 119–146.Google Scholar

McAdam, D. and Paulsen, R. 1993. “Specifying the Relationship between Social Ties and Activism”. American Journal of Sociology 99 (3): 640–667.Google Scholar

McAdam, D. and Schaffer Boudet, H. 2012. Putting Social Movements in Their Place. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C. 2003 (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C. 2008. “Measuring Mechanisms of Contention”. Qualitative Sociology 31: 307–332.Google Scholar

McAtackney, L. 2014. An Archaeology of the Troubles: The Dark Heritage of Long Kesh/Maze Prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J.-D. and Zald, M. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory”. American Journal of Sociology 38: 1212–1241.Google Scholar

McDewitt, J. and Williamson, J. 2003. “Hate Crimes Directed at Gay, lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered Victims”. in International Handbook of Violence Research, edited by Heitmeyer, W. and Horgan, J. New York: Springer, 810–815.Google Scholar

McDonald, K. 2013. “Grammars of Violence, Modes of Embodiment and Frontiers of the Subject”. In War and Body. Militarisation, Practice and Experience, edited by McSorley, K. London: Routledge, 138–150.Google Scholar

McDowall, D. 1996. A Modern History of the Kurds. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar

McEvoy, K. and Shirlow, P. 2009. “Re-Imagining DDR. Ex-Combatants, Leadership and Moral Agency in Conflict Transformation”. Theoretical Criminology 13 (1): 31–59.Google Scholar

McKeown, L. 2001. Out of Time: Irish Republican Prisoners, Long Kesh, 1972–2000. Belfast: Beyond the Pale.Google Scholar

McKeown, L. 2009. “Casualties of War” or “Agents of Change” Irish Republican Prisoners, Maze/Long Kesh Prison, 1972–200”. In Political Ideology in Ireland: From the Enlightenment to the Present, edited by Coquelin, O., Galliou, P., and Robin, T., Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publications, 274–283.Google Scholar

McPherson, J. M., Popielarz, P., and Drobnic, S. 1992. “Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics”. American Sociological Review 57 (2): 153–170.Google Scholar

Memmi, D. 1996. “Les déplacés. Travail sur soi et ascension sociale: la promotion littéraire de Jules Romain”. Genèses 24 sept.: 57–80.Google Scholar

Meneguello, R. 1989. PT, a Formação de um Partido, 1979–1982. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar

Meyer, D. S. and Whittier, N. 2004. “Social Movement Spillover”. Social Problems 41 (2): 277–298.Google Scholar

Mika, H. 2006. Community Based Restorative Justice in Northern Ireland: An Evaluation. Belfast Institute of Criminology and Criminal Justice: Queens University of Belfast.Google Scholar

Monceau, N. 2007. Générations démocrates. Les élites turques et le pouvoir. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar

Morris, A. D. and Staggenborg, S. 2007. “Leadership in Social Movements”. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., and Kriesi, H. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 171–196.Google Scholar

Morrison, J. 2014. “A Time to Think, a Time to Talk: Irish Republicanism Prisoners in the Northern Irish Peace Process”. In Prisons, Terrorism and Extremism. Critical Issues in Management, Radicalisation and Reform, edited by Silke, A. New York: Routledge, 75–87.Google Scholar

Moss-Kanter, R. 1968. “Commitment and Social Organization: A Study of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian Communities”. American Sociological Review 33 (4): 499–517.Google Scholar

Moss-Kanter, R. 1972. “Commitment and Community”. Communes and Utopias in Sociological Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Universtiy Press.Google Scholar

Mouride, A. 2001. On affame bien les rats. Casablanca: Tarik Éditions.Google Scholar

Mozny, I. 2009 (1991). Proc tak snadno ? Nektere rodinne duvody sametove revoluce. [Why so easy? Some family reasons of the Velvet Revolution]. Prague: SLON.Google Scholar

Muel-Dreyfus, F. 1983. Le métier d’éducateur. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Muller, E. N. and Jukam, T. O. 1977. “The Meaning of Political Support”. American Political Science Review 71: 1561–1595.Google Scholar

Nepstad, S. E. and Smith, C. 1999. “Rethinking Recruitment to High-Risk/Cost Activism: The Case of Nicaragua Exchange”. Mobilization 4 (1): 25–40.Google Scholar

Neveu, E. 2008. “Trajectoires de soixante-huitards ordinaires”. In Mai-Juin 68, edited by Damamme, D., Gobille, B., Matonti, F., and Pudal, B. Paris: Editions de l’Atelier, 306–318.Google Scholar

Neveu, E. 2014. “Memory Battles over Mai '68: Interpretative Struggles as Cultural Re-Play of Social Movements”. In Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research, edited by Baumgarten, B., Daphi, P., and Ullrich, P. London: Palgrave/Macmillan, 275–299.Google Scholar

Neveu, E. 2015. “French Literature and the Construction and Transformations of May '68’s Memory”. In From Multitudes to Crowds. Collective Action and the Media, edited by Torres, C. and Mateus, S. Bern: Peter Lang, 89–110.Google Scholar

Neveu, E. and Quéré, L. 1996. “Le temps de l’événement. Présentation”. Réseaux 14 (75): 7–21.Google Scholar

Nussio, E, 2012. “Emotional Legacies of War among Former Colombian Paramilitaries”. Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace and Psychology 18 (4): 369–383.Google Scholar

O’Donnel, G., Schmitter, P., and Whitehead, L. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

O’Hearn, D. 2017. “Movements Inside and Outside of Prison: The H-Block Protest”. In The Troubles: Northern Ireland and Theories of Social Movements, edited by Bosi, L. and DeFazio, G. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

O’Hearn, D. 2009. “Repression and Solidarity Cultures of Resistance: Irish Political Prisoners on Protest”. American Journal of Sociology 115 (2): 491–526.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, T. 2017. “‘Mother Ireland, Get off Our Backs’: Republican Feminist Resistance in the North of Ireland”. In The Troubles: Northern Ireland and Theories of Social Movements, edited by Bosi, L. and DeFazio, G. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Oberschall, A. 1973. Social Conflicts and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Offe, C. 1991. “Capitalism by Democratic Design?’ Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe”. Social Research 58 (4): 865–881.Google Scholar

Olivier-Téllez, G., Tamayo-Flores-Alatorre, S., and Voegtli, M. 2013. “La démobilisation étudiante au Mexique: le double visage de la répression (juillet-décembre 1968)”. European Journal of Turkish Studies [Online], 17, accessed March 13, 2013 http://ejts.revues.org/4819.Google Scholar

Olivier, G. 2007. Educación superior privada en México. Veinte años de expansión: 1982–2002. Mexico: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Colección Más Textos, No. 29.Google Scholar

Olson, M. 1974. The Logic of Collective Action. Public Good and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Opp, K.-D. and Roehl, W. 1990. “Repression, Micromobilization, and Political Protest”. Social Forces 69 (2): 521–547.Google Scholar

Orhan, M. 2015. Political Violence and Kurds in Turkey: Fragmentations, Mobilizations, Participations and Repertoires. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Osa, M. 1998. “Contention and Democracy: Labor Protest in Poland, 1989–1993”. Communist and Postcommunist Studies 31 (1): 29–42.Google Scholar

Ost, D. 1990. Solidarity and the Politics of Anti-Politics: Opposition and Reform in Poland since 1968. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Pacewicz, J. 2015. “Playing the Neoliberal Game: Why Community Leaders Left Party Politics to Partisan Activists”. American Journal of Sociology 121 (3): 826–881.Google Scholar

Pagis, J. 2009. “Repenser la formation de générations politiques sous l’angle du genre: Le cas de ‘Mai–Juin 68.’” CLIO Histoire Femmes et Sociétés 29 (May): 97–118.Google Scholar

Pagis, J. 2010. The politicization of religious commitments. Reassessing the determinants of participation in May ’68, Revue française de science politique/English, vol. 60 (1): 61–89.Google Scholar

Pagis, J. 2014. Mai 68. Un pavé dans leur histoire. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Pagis, J. 2018. May’68: Shaping Political Generations. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Parkinson, S. E. 2013. “Organizing Rebellion: Rethinking High-Risk Mobilization and Social Networks in War”. American Political Science Review 107 (3): 418–432.Google Scholar

Passerini, L. 1996. Autoritratto Di Gruppo. Milan: Giunti.Google Scholar

Passeron, J.-C. 1980. “Biographies, flux, itinéraires, trajectoires”. Revue française de sociologie 31 (1): 3–22.Google Scholar

Pellen, C. 2009. “Les manifestations paysannes polonaises de 1998–1999. Politisation, médiatisation et personnalisation d’une mobilisation contestataire”. Politix 86: 167–188.Google Scholar

Pellen, C. 2010. Sociologie d’un groupement politique illégitime. Le mouvement Samoobrona (Autodéfense) en Pologne (1991–2010). Ph D Political Science, Institut d'Etudes Politiques Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Percheron, A. 1974. L’univers politique des enfants. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Percheron, A. and Jennings, M. K. 1981. “Political Continuities in French Families: A New Perspective on an Old Controversy”. Comparative Politics 13: 421–436.Google Scholar

Persell, C. H. 1990. “Becoming a Member of Society through Socialization”. In Understanding, Society: An introduction to Sociology. 3rd. edn, edited by Persell, C. H. New York: Harper & Row Publishers Inc., 98–107.Google Scholar

Peschansky, D. 1992. “Les enjeux du témoignage. Effets pervers”. In La bouche de la Vérité ? La recherche historique et les sources orales, edited by Voldman, D. Paris: CNRS, Les Cahiers de l’IHTP, 21.Google Scholar

Piskorski, M. 2004. “Samoobrona Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej”. In Polskie partie i ugrupowanie parlamentarne, edited by Kowalczyk, K. and Sielski, J. Torun: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek: 197–226.Google Scholar

Piven, F. F. and Cloward, R. A. 1979. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

PKK Program. 1981. September, N.A.Google Scholar

Pollak, M. 1982. “La régulation technologique: le difficile mariage entre le droit et la technologie”. Revue française de science politique 2: 165–185.Google Scholar

Polletta, F. 1998a. ‘‘Contending Stories: Narrative in Social Movements.’’ Qualitative Sociology 21 (4): 419 –446.Google Scholar

Polletta, F. 1998b. “‘It Was like a Fever …’ Narrative and Identity in Social Protest”. Social Problems 45 (2): 137–59.Google Scholar

Polletta, F. 2009. “Storytelling in Social Movements”. In Culture, Social Movements, and Protest, edited by Johnston, H. Farnham: Ashgate: 33–53.Google Scholar

Polletta, F. and Jasper, J. 2001. “Collective Identity and Social Movements”. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 283–305.Google Scholar

Porhel, V. 2008. Ouvriers bretons: Conflits d’usines, conflits identitaires en Bretagne dans les années 19’68. Rennes: PUR.Google Scholar

Potel, J.-Y. 2006. Scènes de grèves en Pologne. Paris: Noir sur blanc.Google Scholar

Poussou-Plesse, M. 2009 “Le turning point sous le regard du point final. Retour sur un usage canonique de la notion de carrière en sociologie”. In Bifurcations : Les sciences sociales face aux ruptures et à l’événement, edited by Grossetti, M, Bessin, M, and Bidart, C. Paris: La Découverte: 254–270.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A. 1996. “II. La democracia como resultado contingente de conflictos”. In Constitucionalismo y democracia. Estudio introductorio de Alejandro Herrera, editey by Elster, J. and Slagstad, R. Mexico: Colegio Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Administración Pública A.C. and Fondo de Cultura Económica, 89–110.Google Scholar

Pudal, B. 1989. Prendre parti. Pour une sociologie historique du PCF. Paris: Presses de la FNSP.Google Scholar

Pushkarna, V. 1998a. “Terrorists’ Children”. The Week, 19 April.Google Scholar

Pushkarna, V. 1998b. “Interview: Jasmeet Kaur, Widow of a Terrorist”. The Week, 19 April.Google Scholar

Quintanilla, J. 2014. Y tú apareces por mi ventana. Doña Naty, lo que nos dejó. Cuernavaca: Edición independiente.Google Scholar

Ray, R. 1998. “Women’s Movements and Political Fields: A Comparison of Two Indian Cities”. Social Problems 45 (1): 21–36.Google Scholar

Ribeiro, P. F. 2009. “O PT, o Estado e a sociedade (1980–2005)”. In O Partido dos Trabalhadores e a Política Brasileira (1980–2006). Uma história revisitada, edited by Angelo de, V. A. and Villa, M. A. São Paolo: Edufscar, 183–217.Google Scholar

Ribeiro, P. F. 2010. Dos sindicatos ao governo. A organização nacional do PT de 1980 a 2005. São Paolo: Edufscar.Google Scholar

Rioux, J.-P. 2008. “L’évènement-mémoire. Quarante ans de commemorations”. Le Débat (149).Google Scholar

Roberts, B. 1995. The Making of Citizens. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Robnett, B. 1996. “Afro-American Women in the Civil Tights Movement, 1954–1965: Gender, Leadership and Micromobilization”. American Journal of Sociology 101 (6): 1661–1693.Google Scholar

Rocha, D. 2007. Le parti des travailleurs à l’épreuve du pouvoir. Le PT dans le district fédéral au Brésil (1980–2000). PhD dissertation. Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar

Rochford, E. B. 1985. Hare Krishma in America. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Rodriguês, L. M. 1997. “PT, a New Actor in Brazilian Politics”. In Political Culture, Social Movements and Democratic Transitions in South America in the Twentieth Century, edited by Devoto, F. J. and de Tella, T. Milan: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli, 293–316.Google Scholar

Rokkan, S. 2008. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Rolston, B. 2007. “Demobilization and Reintegration of Ex-Combatants: The Irish Case in International Perspective”. Social & Legal Studies 16 (2): 259–280.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, P. and Viveret, P. 1977. Pour une Nouvelle Culture Politique. Paris: Seuil-Intervention.Google Scholar

Ross, K. 2004. May’ '68 and Its Afterlives. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Roth, S. 2007. “Biographical Consequences of Social Movements”. In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by Ritzer, G. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 4451–4453.Google Scholar

Rupp, L. and Taylor, V. 1986, “The Women’s Movement since 1960: Structure, Strategies, and New Directions”. In American Choices: Social Dilemmas and Public Policy Since 1960, edited by Bremmer, R. H., Reichard, G. W., and Hopkins, R. J. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 75–104.Google Scholar

Rupp, L. and Taylor, V. 1987, Survival in the Doldrums. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ryder, C. 2000. Inside the Maze: The Inside Story of the Northern Ireland Prison Service. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Salles, J.-P. 2005. La Ligue Communiste Révolutionnaire (1968–1981) Instrument du grand soir ou lieu d’apprentissage ? Rennes: PUR.Google Scholar

Samuels, D. 2004. “From Socialism to Social Democracy ? Party Organization and the Transformation of the Worker’s Party in Brazil”. Comparative Political Studies 37 (9): 999–1024.Google Scholar

Sandhu, A. 2009. Jat Sikh Women: Social Transformation: Changing Status and Life Style. Delhi: Unistar Books.Google Scholar

Santos dos, A. M. 2001. “Sedimentação de lealdades partidárias no Brasil: tendências e descompassos”. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 16 (45): 69–83.Google Scholar

Sapiro, V. 1989. “The Women’s Movement and the Creation of Gender Consciousness.” In Political Socialization for Democracy, edited by Ichilov, O. New York: Teachers College Press, 266–280.Google Scholar

Saunders, C., Grasso, M., Olcese, C., Rainsford, E., and Rootes, C. 2012. “Explaining Differential Protest Participation: Novices, Returners, Repeaters, and Stalwarts”. Mobilization 17 (3): 263–280.Google Scholar

Sayari, S. 2010. “Political Violence and Terrorism in Turkey, 1976–80: A Retrospective Analysis”. Terrorism and Political Violence 22 (2): 198–215.Google Scholar

Schacter, D. L. 1996. Searching for Memory: The Brain, the Mind, and the Past. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Schalk, P. 1997. “Resistance and Martyrdom in the Process of State Formation of Tamililam”. In Martyrdom and Political Resistance: Essays from Asia and Europe, edited by Pettigrew, J. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Schedler, A. 2001. “Taking Uncertainty Seriously: The Blurred Boundaries of Democratic Transition and Consolidation”. Democratization 8 (4): 1–22.Google Scholar

Schwartz, M. 2010. “Interactions between Social Movements and US Political Parties”. Party Politics 16 (5): 587–607.Google Scholar

Schwartz, N. and Seymour, S. 1994. Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Scott, J. and Alwin, D. 1998. “Retrospective versus Prospective Measurement of Life Histories in Longitudinal Research.” In Methods of Life Course Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, edited by Elder, G. and Ziele, J. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 98–127.Google Scholar

Sears, D. and McConahay, J. B. 1973. The Politics of Violence: The New Urban Blacks and the Watts Riot. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar

Serret, E. 2001. El género y lo simbólico: La constitución imaginaria de la identidad femenina. Mexico: UAM Azcapotzalco.Google Scholar

Sewell, W. H. 1996. “Historical Events as Transformations of Structures: Inventing Revolution at the Bastille”. Theory and Society 25: 841–881.Google Scholar

Shahnazarian, N. 2016. “A Good Soldier and a Good Mother: New Conditions and New Roles in the Nagorno-Karabakh War”. The Journal of Power Institutions in Post-Soviet Societies 17 [https://pipss.revues.org/4241].Google Scholar

Sherkat, D. and Blocker, J. 1994. “The Political Development of Sixties’ Activists: Identifying the Influence of Class, Gender and Socialisation on Protest Participation”. Social Forces 72 (3): 821–842.Google Scholar

Sherkat, D. E. and Blocker, J. T. 1997. “Explaining the Political and Personal Consequences of Protest”. Social Forces 75: 1049–1076.Google Scholar

Shirlow, P. and McEvoy, K. 2008. Beyond the Wire: Former Prisoners and Conflict Transformation in Northern Ireland. London. Pluto.Google Scholar

Shirlow, P. Tonge, J., McAueley, J., and McGlym, C. 2010. Abandoning Historical Conflict? Former Political Prisoners and Reconciliation in Northern Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Sigel, R. (ed). 1989. Political Learning in Adulthood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Skilling, G. 1981. Charter 77 and Human Rights in Czechoslovakia. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Skockpol, T. 1988. “An ‘Uppity Generation’ and the Revitalization of Macroscopic Sociology: Reflections at Mid-Career by a Woman from the Sixties”. Theory and Society 17: 627–643.Google Scholar

Smaoui, S. and Wazif, M. 2013. “Étendard de lutte ou pavillon de complaisance ? S’engager sous la bannière du “mouvement du 20 février” à Casablanca”. In Devenir révolutionnaires. Au cœur des révoltes arabes, edited by Allal, A. and Pierret, T. Paris: Armand Colin: 55–85.Google Scholar

Snow, D. 2001. “Analyse de cadres et mouvements sociaux”. In Les Formes de l’action Collective. Mobilisations dans des Arénes Publiques, edited by Cefaï, D. and Trom, D. Paris: Editions de l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, 27–49.Google Scholar

Snow, D. A., Zurcher, L. A., and Ekland-Olson, S. 1980. “Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment”. American Sociological Review 45 (5): 787–801.Google Scholar

Soderstrom, J. 2013. “The Political Consequences of Reintegration Programmes in Current Peace-Building: A Framework for Analysis”. Conflict, Security and Development 13 (1): 87–116.Google Scholar

Sommier, I. 1994. “Mai '68: Sous les pavés d’une plage officielle”. Sociétés Contemporaines 20 (1): 63–82.Google Scholar

Sommier, I. 1998. La violence politique et son deuil. Rennes: PUR.Google Scholar

Sommier, I. 2008. “Les gauchismes”. In Mai-Juin 68, edited by Damamme, D., Gobille, B., Matonti, F., and Pudal, B. Paris: Ed. de l’Atelier. Paris: 306–318.Google Scholar

Sommier, I. 2010. La violence révolutionnaire. Paris: Presses de SciencesPo.Google Scholar

Soulet, M.-H. 2010. “Changer de vie, devenir autre: essai de formalisation des processus engages”. In Bifurcations. Les sciences sociales face aux ruptures et à l’événement, edited by Bessin, M., Bidart, C., and Grossetto, M. Paris: La Découverte: 273–288.Google Scholar

Spanou, C. 2000 (1991). Fonctionnaires et militants. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Steinhoff, P. and Zwerman, G. 2008. “Introduction to the Special Issue on Political Violence”. Qualitative Sociology 31 (3): 213–220.Google Scholar

Strauss, A. L. 2008 (1959). Mirrors and Masks: The Search for Identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Suk, J. 2003 (2009). Labyrintem revoluce. Akteri, zapletky a krizovatky jedne politicke krize (od listopadu 1989 do cervna 1990) [The Labyrinth of the Revolutioon. Actors, Storylines and Crossroads of a Political Crisis (from November 1989 until June 1990)]. Prague: Prostor.Google Scholar

Szawiel, T. 2004. “Kryzys demokracji a poparcie systemu politycznego w Polsce”. In Populizm a demokracja, edited by Markowski, R. Warsaw: ISP-PAN: 145–171.Google Scholar

Szczerbiak, A. 2004. “The Polish Centre-Right’s (Last ?) Best Hope: The Rise and Fall of Solidarity Electoral Action”. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20 (3): 55–79.Google Scholar